Aineta aryballos | |
---|---|
Material | Ceramic |
Size | 6.35 centimetres (2.50 in) (height) [1] |
Writing | Ancient Greek (Corinthian alphabet) |
Created | Disputed; c. 625 – c. 570 BCE |
Discovered | c. 1852 Corinth, Greece |
Present location | British Museum, London |
Identification | 1865,1213.1 |
The Aineta aryballos is an Ancient Greek aryballos (a small, spherical flask), made between approximately 625 and 570 BCE in the city of Corinth in southern Greece. Approximately 6.35 centimetres (2.50 in) in both height and diameter, it was intended to contain perfumed oil or unguent, and is likely to have been owned by a high-class courtesan ( hetaira ) by the name of Aineta, who may be portrayed in a drawing on its handle. The vase's illegal sale to the British Museum in 1865 led to the prosecution of its seller, the Athenian professor and art dealer Athanasios Rhousopoulos, and exposed his widespread involvement in antiquities crime.
The vase is inscribed with a portrait, generally agreed to be that of a woman and probably that of Aineta, who is named in the inscription on the vase. Below the portrait are the names of nine men, generally taken to be Aineta's admirers or lovers. The Aineta aryballos is likely to have been found in a grave, probably that of Aineta herself. According to Rhousopoulos, it was discovered in Corinth around 1852. In 1877, Panagiotis Efstratiadis, the Ephor General of Antiquities in charge of the Greek Archaeological Service, had Rhousopoulos fined for selling the vase in contravention of Greek law. Yannis Galanakis has called the case "a milestone in the trafficking of Greek antiquities", in that it represented a relatively rare successful use of state power against the illegal trade in Ancient Greek artefacts. [2]
The Aineta aryballos is made from yellowish clay. [3] It is a small vase, with a spherical body and a disc-shaped neck, connected by a handle. [4] The entire aryballos is approximately 6.35 centimetres (2.50 in) in height [1] and diameter. Its base is flat, allowing it to stand on its own. The opening of the jar is approximately 8 millimetres (0.31 in) in diameter, within a mouth approximately 4.2–4.8 centimetres (1.7–1.9 in) in diameter. The handle is 3.0 centimetres (1.2 in) wide and 2.5 centimetres (0.98 in) tall, and tapers slightly towards the bottom. The vase itself was made on a potter's wheel in two pieces – the globular body and the disc-shaped neck – which were subsequently joined to each other and to the handle. [4]
The Athenian art dealer Athanasios Rhousopoulos, a professor at the University of Athens, [5] made the first scholarly publication of the aryballos in 1862, in which he described it as "rather rough, but diligently cleaned". [3] In his initial publication, Rhousopoulos said that it resembled a quince; [4] later, he would describe it as "the size of an apple". [6]
Aryballoi were typically used to store small amounts of perfumed oil or unguent. [7] Rhousopoulos believed that the vase may have been a gift from her lovers to a high-class courtesan ( hetaira ) named Aineta, or perhaps deposited as a grave good in her tomb. [a] In support of this latter hypothesis, Rhousopoulos suggested the vase's excellent state of preservation, as well as the lack of any post-manufacture inscriptions (such as the kalos inscription common on Attic vases) indicated that it had never been used. [8] Matthias Steinhart and Eckhard Wirbelauer wrote in 2000 that it is universally considered to have been a gift of some nature, [9] while Rudolf Wachter concurred in 2001 with Rhousopoulos's assessment that the vase was probably a "love-gift". [10]
The body and mouth of the vase are decorated with rosettes. Rhousopoulos considered the mouth, with its flower-like motif centred on the opening, as the finest part of the vase, writing "here we trace a fully Greek taste". However, he contrasted this with the decoration of the vase body, where, he judged, "we immediately find ourselves in unknown regions of Asia: magnificent, ... but strange and exotic". [11] [b]
The vase was made in the city of Corinth, in southern Greece. [13] On the basis of its decoration, Rhousopoulos dated the vase to the 30th Olympiad (660–656 BCE), which would have made the Aineta aryballos the oldest-known inscribed Corinthian vase, [14] and place it in the ceramic period known as Middle Protocorinthian II. [15] Its date has since been disputed: in his 1931 work on Corinthian pottery, Humfry Payne dated it to approximately 625 BCE on the basis of the letter-forms used in the inscription, an assessment endorsed by Lilian Hamilton Jeffery in 1961. [16] In 1979, Fritz Lorber argued that Payne's date was too early: he discussed the vase among those of the Early Corinthian period (620/615–595/590 BCE), [17] and wrote that the letter-forms show features, such as the serpentine form of the letter iota, characteristic of sixth-century inscriptions. [12] Darrell A. Amyx suggested in 1988 that it most likely dates to the Middle Corinthian period (595/590–570 BCE), a view upheld by Wachter. [18]
The handle of the vase is inscribed with a drawing of the head of a woman, with a list of nine men's names on the vase body below it, [19] [c] separated from each other and the portrait by three dividing lines. [21] Similar female portraits are common on other Corinthian vases of the type. [22] All of the names, as well as the drawing, were inscribed at the time of the vase's manufacture. [8] The writing uses the Corinthian alphabet. [23]
Descending from the mouth of the woman's portrait is an inscription, Aineta emi (Αἰνέτα ἐμί): the word emi [d] means "I am", and Aineta is a name, meaning "the famous one" or "the praised one". [24] It is generally considered to be a woman's name, [e] probably of a hetaira, as it fits the common tendency for hetairai to have self-descriptive "speaking names". [26] Scholars debate whether Aineta is in the nominative or the genitive case: if the former, the inscription translates as "I am Aineta"; if the latter, it means "I am Aineta's". In support of the nominative reading, Wachter and Margherita Guarducci point out that the words are written descending from the portrait's mouth, as if representing the portrait's speech. [27] This is the earliest known example in Greek pottery of a speech-inscription; they became reasonably common in the sixth century BCE. [28]
In 1976, Carlo Gallavotti argued that the portrait was that of a man's head, that the name was that of Ainetas, a male dancer, and that the other names were members of his troupe, including a musician named Menneas. [29] This view has generally been rejected. [30] Payne had earlier dismissed the "Ainetas" hypothesis on the grounds that the name is otherwise unknown in Greek. [31] Aineta is sometimes considered to be a pseudonym or the name of a fictional hetaira, though Wachter considers it most likely to be real. [26] The name Meneas (or Menneas) comes first in the list and is written slightly larger and more boldly than the others, and so seems to have been given particular prominence. [10]
Rhousopoulos interpreted the female face as a drawing of the goddess Aphrodite. [8] Most subsequent assessments have considered it more likely to be a portrait of Aineta herself. [24] Katerina Volioti and Maria Papageorgiou have associated the portrait with similar depictions connected to the coming of age of upper-class women. [32] In a 1942 article, Majorie Milne considered that the presence of multiple male names showed a "co-operative spirit" between Aineta's admirers, and contrasted the vase with a pyxis showing three female names that she suggested were those of hetairai. [33] Wachter has described the list of names on the Aineta aryballos as good evidence for Corinthian prosopography and onomastics at the time of the vase's use. [10]
The vase was first mentioned in scholarship by Rhousopoulos, in an 1862 article in the journal of the German Archaeological Institute at Rome . [34] According to Rhousopoulos's publication, the vase had been discovered around 1852 in Corinth, and had "come into [his] possession" a few years later. [4]
Rhousopoulos was a part of the illegal trade in ancient artefacts excavated surreptitiously and without official permission. [35] In the early 1870s, he boasted to the Oxford professor George Rolleston that he was able to call upon "all the Athens grave-diggers [f] who dig for tombs throughout Attica". [38] Though his activities had not yet attracted official notice, [6] Nikolaos Papazarkadas has written that Rhousopoulos "was heavily involved in dubious transactions involving illegally-excavated antiquities". [35] The main law governing antiquities was the Archaeological Law of 22 May [ O.S. 10 May] 1834, [g] which Yannis Galanakis has characterised as "loosely interpreted and even more loosely enforced". [40] Under the 1834 law, private excavators – often referred to as "grave-robbers" [41] – required the permission of the Ephor General to excavate, but the Ephor General was obliged to grant that authorisation if the excavation took place on private land and had the landowner's consent. [42] Furthermore, antiquities discovered in such excavations were considered the joint property of the state and the private excavators, [43] and would be shared between the landowners and the excavators. [44] Such artefacts could be sold freely overseas, provided that their owners secured the judgement of a state committee of three experts that the object was "useless" to Greek museums. [45]
In 1865, Panagiotis Efstratiadis, the Ephor General in charge of the Greek Archaeological Service, [h] wrote in his diary of the size and richness of Rhousopoulos's antiquities collection, marking the first time that Rhousopoulos's activities had come to official attention. [6] Rhousopoulos sold the aryballos to the British Museum for 1,000 drachmae in 1865, [2] [i] via Charles Merlin, a British banker and diplomat resident in Athens who often acted as an intermediary for antiquities purchases. Charles Newton, the museum's Keeper of Greek and Roman Antiquities, had previously selected the object for purchase, and subsequently received it from Merlin. [48] Rhousopoulos made the sale without securing the required permission from the state committee, but defended himself in the newspaper Elpis on 16 February [ O.S. 4 February] 1867, arguing that the aryballos was "of no artistic value, the size of an apple, only valued for 25 drachmae". [6] [i] Efstratiadis, meanwhile, denounced Rhousopoulos as a "university professor; antiquities looter". [49]
Efstratiadis's ability to respond to Rhousopoulos's breach of the law was limited: the state had few financial, human or legal resources to address the illegal excavation and trade of antiquities, and his superiors in government had little political will to do so. [50] He also needed to maintain good relations with Athens's art dealers, who undertook more excavations in this period than either the Greek Archaeological Service or the closely aligned Archaeological Society of Athens, and usually offered to sell the artefacts they uncovered to the state. [51] Furthermore, Rhousopoulos was periodically a member of the appraising committee of three, and often acted as a consultant to it, further limiting Efstratiadis's ability to use the state's archaeological apparatus against him. [6]
Rhousopoulos was, however, fined 1,000 drachmae (the same as the price for which he had sold the aryballos) later in 1867 for exporting antiquities without the Ephor General's permission. His actions were condemned by the Minister for Education and Religious Affairs, who oversaw the Archaeological Service, [52] and by the Archaeological Society of Athens, which expelled him at some point in the 1870s. [53] Rhousopoulos subsequently endeavoured to keep his antiquities dealing outside the knowledge and scrutiny of the state. [52] Galanakis has called the case over the aryballos "a milestone in the trafficking of Greek antiquities", in that it represented a rare successful prosecution for the unauthorised export of an ancient artefact under the 1834 law. [2]
Pottery, due to its relative durability, comprises a large part of the archaeological record of ancient Greece, and since there is so much of it, it has exerted a disproportionately large influence on our understanding of Greek society. The shards of pots discarded or buried in the 1st millennium BC are still the best guide available to understand the customary life and mind of the ancient Greeks. There were several vessels produced locally for everyday and kitchen use, yet finer pottery from regions such as Attica was imported by other civilizations throughout the Mediterranean, such as the Etruscans in Italy. There were a multitude of specific regional varieties, such as the South Italian ancient Greek pottery.
Black-figure pottery painting, also known as the black-figure style or black-figure ceramic, is one of the styles of painting on antique Greek vases. It was especially common between the 7th and 5th centuries BCE, although there are specimens dating in the 2nd century BCE. Stylistically it can be distinguished from the preceding orientalizing period and the subsequent red-figure pottery style.
Kyriakos S. Pittakis was a Greek archaeologist. He was the first Greek to serve as Ephor General of Antiquities, the head of the Greek Archaeological Service, in which capacity he carried out the conservation and restoration of several monuments on the Acropolis of Athens. He has been described as a "dominant figure in Greek archaeology for 27 years", and as "one of the most important epigraphers of the nineteenth century".
An aryballos was a small spherical or globular flask with a narrow neck used in Ancient Greece. It was used to contain perfume or oil, and is often depicted in vase paintings being used by athletes during bathing. In these depictions, the vessel is at times attached by a strap to the athlete's wrist, or hung by a strap from a peg on the wall.
Christos Tsountas was a Greek classical archaeologist. He is considered a pioneer of Greek archaeology and has been called "the first and most eminent Greek prehistorian".
The Protogeometric style is a style of Ancient Greek pottery led by Athens and produced, in Attica and Central Greece, between roughly 1025 and 900 BCE, during the Greek Dark Ages. It was succeeded by the Early Geometric period.
Darrell Arlynn Amyx was an American classical archaeologist. His principal field of study was the archaic pottery of Corinth. Complementing the pioneering work of John Beazley and Humfry Payne, Amyx applied stylistic analysis to the work of previously unnamed and unstudied Corinthian painters, discerning many otherwise forgotten "hands".
Gryton was a Boeotian potter who worked in the first half of the 6th century BC. He is only known by his signature on the sole of a plastic aryballos in the shape of a sandal-clad foot, which is housed in the Museum of Fine Arts in Boston. A catalogue of his works was published by Raubitschek along with works of ancient Boeotian potters. These included the Ring Aryballos, which is part of a collection of Berlin's Staatliche Museen.
The Chigi vase is a Proto-Corinthian olpe, or pitcher, that is the name vase of the Chigi Painter. It was found in an Etruscan tomb at Monte Aguzzo, near Veio, on Prince Mario Chigi’s estate in 1881. The vase has been variously assigned to the middle and late Proto-Corinthian periods and given a date of c. 650–640 BC; it is now in the National Etruscan Museum, Villa Giulia, Rome.
Boeotian vase painting was a regional style of ancient Greek vase painting. Since the Geometric period, and up to the 4th century BC, the region of Boeotia produced vases with ornamental and figural painted decoration, usually of lesser quality than the vase paintings from other areas.
Ludwig Ross was a German classical archaeologist. He is chiefly remembered for the rediscovery and reconstruction of the Temple of Athena Nike in 1835–1836, and for his other excavation and conservation work on the Acropolis of Athens. He was also an important figure in the early years of archaeology in the independent Kingdom of Greece, serving as Ephor General of Antiquities between 1834 and 1836.
The Greek Archaeological Service is a state service, under the auspices of the Greek Ministry of Culture, responsible for the oversight of all archaeological excavations, museums and the country's archaeological heritage in general.
Ancient Greek art stands out among that of other ancient cultures for its development of naturalistic but idealized depictions of the human body, in which largely nude male figures were generally the focus of innovation. The rate of stylistic development between about 750 and 300 BC was remarkable by ancient standards, and in surviving works is best seen in sculpture. There were important innovations in painting, which have to be essentially reconstructed due to the lack of original survivals of quality, other than the distinct field of painted pottery.
The Euphiletos Painter Panathenaic Amphora is a black-figure terracotta amphora from the Archaic Period depicting a running race, now in the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York. It was painted by the Euphiletos Painter as a victory prize for the Panathenaic Games in Athens in 530 BC.
The Grave Stele of Dexileos is the stele of the tomb of an Athenian cavalryman named Dexileos who died in the Corinthian War against Sparta in 394 BC. The stele is attributed to "The Dexileos Sculptor". Its creation can be dated to 394 BC, based on the inscription on its bottom, which provides the dates of birth and death of Dexileos. The stele is made out of an expensive variety of Pentelic marble and is 1.86 metres tall. It includes a high relief sculpture depicting a battle scene with an inscription below it. The stele was discovered in 1863 in the family plot of Dexileos at the Dipylon cemetery in the Kerameikos cemetery of Athens. It was found in situ, but moved during World War II, and is now on display in the Kerameikos Museum in Athens.
Panagiotis Kavvadias or Cawadias was a Greek archaeologist. He was responsible for the excavation of ancient sites in Greece, including Epidaurus in Argolis and the Acropolis of Athens, as well as archaeological discoveries on his native island of Kephallonia. As Ephor General from 1885 until 1909, Kavvadias oversaw the expansion of the Archaeological Service and the introduction of Law 2646 of 1899, which increased the state's powers to address the illegal excavation and smuggling of antiquities.
Panagiotis Antoniou Stamatakis was a Greek archaeologist. He is noted particularly for his role in supervising the excavations of Heinrich Schliemann at Mycenae in 1876, and his role in recording and preserving the archaeological remains at the site.
Panagiotis Efstratiadis or Eustratiades was a Greek archaeologist. He served as Ephor General of Antiquities, the head of the Greek Archaeological Service, between 1864 and 1884, succeeding Kyriakos Pittakis.
Athanasios Sergiou Rhousopoulos was a Greek archaeologist, antiquities dealer and university professor. He has been described as "the most important Greek collector and dealer between the 1860s and 1890s", and as "a key figure in the early days of archaeology in Greece."
Charles Louis William Merlin was a British banker, diplomat and antiquities trader. He is known for his role in procuring objects, particularly Graeco-Roman antiquities, for the British Museum.