Lycurgus Cup

Last updated
Lycurgus Cup
Front of 4th century CE Roman Lycurgus Cup, British Museum (1958,1202.1).jpg
Appearance when back-lit
MaterialGlass, dichroic, later gilt-silver ornament mounted to rim and foot
SizeHeight: 15.9 cm (6.3 in)
Width: 13.2 cm (5.2 in)
Weight700 g (1.5 lb)
Created4th century CE
Period/cultureLate Roman
Present location British Museum, Room 41
Identification 1958,1202.1
When viewed in reflected light, as in this flash photograph, the cup's dichroic glass is green in colour, whereas when viewed in transmitted light, the glass appears red. Green Lycurgus Cup.jpg
When viewed in reflected light, as in this flash photograph, the cup's dichroic glass is green in colour, whereas when viewed in transmitted light, the glass appears red.

The Lycurgus Cup is a 4th-century Roman glass cage cup made of a dichroic glass, which shows a different colour depending on whether or not light is passing through it: red when lit from behind and green when lit from in front. [1] It is the only complete Roman glass object made from this type of glass, [2] and the one exhibiting the most impressive change in colour; [3] it has been described as "the most spectacular glass of the period, fittingly decorated, which we know to have existed". [4]

Contents

The cup is also a very rare example of a complete Roman cage-cup, or diatretum, where the glass has been painstakingly cut and ground back to leave only a decorative "cage" at the original surface-level. Many parts of the cage have been completely undercut. Most cage-cups have a cage with a geometric abstract design, but here there is a composition with figures, [5] showing the mythical King Lycurgus, who (depending on the version) tried to kill Ambrosia, a follower of the god Dionysus (Bacchus to the Romans). She was transformed into a vine that twined around the enraged king and restrained him, eventually killing him. Dionysus and two followers are shown taunting the king. The cup is the "only well-preserved figural example" of a cage cup. [6]

The dichroic effect is achieved by making the glass with tiny proportions of nanoparticles of gold and silver dispersed in colloidal form throughout the glass material. The process used remains unclear, and it is likely that it was not well understood or controlled by the makers, and was probably discovered by accidental "contamination" with minutely ground gold and silver dust. The glass-makers may not even have known that gold was involved, as the quantities involved are so tiny; they may have come from a small proportion of gold in any silver added (most Roman silver contains small proportions of gold), or from traces of gold or gold leaf left by accident in the workshop, as residue on tools, or from other work. The very few other surviving fragments of Roman dichroic glass vary considerably in their two colours. [7]

The glass

It is estimated that to a conventionally composed Roman glass flux 330 parts per million of silver and 40 of gold were added: "These particles were precipitated as colloids and form a silver-gold alloy. When viewed in reflected light the minute metallic particles are just coarse enough to reflect enough of the light without eliminating the transmission. In transmitted light the fine particles scatter the blue end of the spectrum more effectively than the red end, resulting in red transmission, and this is the colour observed. Since it is impossible that the Roman artisans managed to add these incredibly low levels of silver and gold to the volume of the glass used to make the vessel deliberately, the levels were probably added at higher levels to a larger volume of glass-melt, and increasingly diluted by adding more glass." [8] The particles are only about 70 nanometers across, [9] and embedded in the glass, so they cannot be seen by optical microscopy, and a transmission electron microscope is needed instead. [10] At this size they approach the size of the wavelengths of visible light, and a surface plasmon resonance effect takes place. [11]

The interior of the cup is mostly smooth, but behind the main figures the glass has been hollowed out, well beyond even the main outer surface, so that they are of similar thickness to the main outer surface, giving an even colour when light passes through. This is a feature unique among surviving cups; Harden suggests they were an "afterthought". [12] An area around the torso of Lycurgus is a rather different colour from the rest of the glass; perhaps an accident of manufacture, but one exploited by the glass-cutter "so that he could make Lycurgus's rage glow even more strongly". [13] After the very lengthy cutting stage the fine polished appearance was achieved by a process called "flame polishing" that risked the complete loss of the object. [14] A suggestion in 1995 that in fact this and other cage cups used a mixture of moulding and cutting has met with little acceptance. [15]

The Rubens Vase, an agate hardstone carving of c. A.D. 400 Byzantine - The "Rubens Vase" - Walters 42562.jpg
The Rubens Vase, an agate hardstone carving of c. A.D. 400

Like the British Museum's other spectacular work in Roman glass, the cameo glass Portland Vase, the cup represents to some extent the extension of skills developed by cutters of engraved gems, or the larger hardstone carving of vessels in semi-precious stones, which were luxury arts with enormous prestige in ancient Rome. No carved gemstone vessels directly comparable to either work are known, but the general taste behind these extreme exhibitions of glass-making skill is one formed by objects in natural stones like the Coupe des Ptolémées or the Rubens Vase. [16] Indeed, it was not until the first full studies of the cup in 1950 that it was established for certain that the material was glass and not a gemstone, which had previously been in question. [17]

It seems likely that as many as three separate workshops or factories were involved in the production of the cup, perhaps not in the same part of the Empire. The glass may have been initially made in a large block of standard clear glass, perhaps in Egypt or Palestine, which both exported great quantities of glass for forming, and sometimes colouring, elsewhere. The thick "blank" dichroic vessel was probably made by one specialist workshop and passed to another consisting of specialist cutters. This would certainly have been a rare and highly expensive object, and the secrets of its manufacture, possibly not well understood even by its makers, seem only to have been used for about a century. [18]

There are various small losses, of which the face of the panther is the most significant, and the cup is cracked; the British Museum has never removed the metal rim for this reason. The base or foot of the cup is damaged, and the original form of the base uncertain. [19] The Metropolitan Museum of Art, in New York, has a fragment measuring 2+316 in × 3 in (56 mm × 76 mm) of a satyr from a dichroic cage cup that turns from olive green to "reddish amber". [20]

Modern recreations

Corning Glass Works has reproduced a blank of a material of similar chemical composition and internal structure, which displays under reflected and transmitted light the same "Lycurgus effect" of green to red colour change as the Lycurgus cup material does. [21] Cranberry glass or gold ruby glass is somewhat similar and far more common, manufactured with colloidal gold, but this only ever shows a red colour.

Recently, researchers from The Netherlands have been able to reproduce the green/red dichroic effect in a 3D printable nanocomposite material. [22] [23] This effect, like in the original Lycurgus cup is due to small amounts of silver and gold nanoparticles, of the proper size and shapes, embedded in the 3D printable material.

Iconography

The satyr with the rock, in the new 2014 display Brit Mus room 41 Lycurgus cup no lighting.JPG
The satyr with the rock, in the new 2014 display

The figure of Lycurgus, bound by the vine and naked apart from boots, [24] is flanked on the left by a crouching Ambrosia, at a considerably smaller scale. Behind her one of Dionysus's satyrs (shown with a normal human form) stands on one foot as he prepares to hurl a large rock at Lycurgus. In his other hand he holds a pedum or shepherd's crook. [25] To the right of Lycurgus comes first a figure of Pan, [26] then at his feet a rather canine-looking panther, the traditional companion of Dionysus, whose face is missing but was presumably snapping at the king, and then the god himself, taunting him with his right arm extended in an angry gesture. Dionysus carries a thyrsus, the special staff of the god and his followers, and his dress has an Eastern, perhaps Indian, flavour, reflecting what the Ancient Greeks generally believed (perhaps wrongly) about the origins of his cult. The calf section of one leg has been lost. A streamer hanging behind him from his thyrsus overlaps the raised foot of the satyr with the rock, completing the circle of the cup. [27]

It has been suggested that this not very common scene was a reference to the defeat in 324 by the Emperor Constantine I of his co-emperor Licinius, who was killed in 325 after a period under close guard. [28] Another suggestion is that the colour change from green to red was understood as evoking the ripening of red grapes, so that there was a particular suitability in depicting a scene with the god of wine. The cup may have been intended for use at Bacchic cult celebrations, [29] still very much a feature of Roman religious life around 300. A letter supposedly from the Emperor Hadrian (d. 138) to his brother-in-law Servianus, quoted in a biography in the Historia Augusta , records the gift of two dichroic cups, which the 4th-century author had seen: "I have sent you particoloured cups that change colour, presented to me by the priest of a temple. They are specially dedicated to you and my sister. I would like you to use them at banquets on feast days." [30]

Other depictions of the story tend to either depict Lycurgus attacking Ambrosia, often with a double-headed axe, while her companions rush to her aid, or Lycurgus alone, entangled in the vine. The closest parallel to the scene on the cup is one of the apse mosaics in the triconch triclinium at the Villa del Casale, Piazza Armerina, which may also refer to Licinius. [31] There is also a mosaic at Antioch on the Orontes, and a group on a 2nd-century sarcophagus at the Villa Parisi in Frascati. [32] There is also a floor-mosaic from Vienne, now in the museum at Saint-Romain-en-Gal, with Lycurgus alone inside the vine. [33] The preceding scene of Lycurgus attacking Ambrosia, is on a floor-mosaic at Brading Roman Villa on the Isle of Wight. [34] Of this and similar mosaics, Martin Henig says: "In cases such as this, we are not concerned with simple, popular paganism but with recondite knowledge. This is the sort of esoteric religion which the Emperor Julian, Symmachus, Praetextatus, Macrobius and Proclus relished. The religious thought behind these floors is probably deeper and more complex than contemporary Christianity and many of the keys to understanding it have been lost." [35]

The cup was probably designed for drinking from at feasts, or more specifically Bacchic cult celebrations, [36] where the lack of a foot, also a feature found in other cage-cups, may mean it was passed around, as elaborate cups often were in medieval cultures. Alternatively other cage cups were almost certainly used, suspended, as oil lamps, where the dichroic effect of this cup would show to advantage.

History

A view showing parts in both colours, and the variation in the red Lycurgus Cup red BM MME1958.12-2.1.jpg
A view showing parts in both colours, and the variation in the red

The cup was "perhaps made in Alexandria" or Rome in about 290–325 AD, and measures 16.5  cm × 13.2 cm (6.5  in × 5.2 in). [37] From its excellent condition it is probable that, like several other luxury Roman objects, it has always been preserved above ground; most often such objects ended up in the relatively secure environment of a church treasury. Alternatively it might, like several other cage cups, have been recovered from a sarcophagus. The present gilt-bronze rim and foot were added in about 1800, [38] suggesting it was one of the many objects taken from church treasuries during the period of the French Revolution and French Revolutionary Wars. The foot continues the theme of the cup with open-work vine leaves, and the rim has leaf forms that lengthen and shorten to match the scenes in glass. In 1958 the foot was removed by British Museum conservators, and not rejoined to the cup until 1973. [39] There may well have been earlier mounts. [40]

The early history of the cup is unknown, and it is first mentioned in print in 1845, when a French writer said he had seen it "some years ago, in the hands of M. Dubois". [41] This is probably shortly before it was acquired by the Rothschild family. [42] Certainly Lionel de Rothschild owned it by 1857, when the touring Gustav Friedrich Waagen saw it in his collection and described it as "barbaric and debased". [43] In 1862 Lionel lent it to an exhibition at what is now the Victoria and Albert Museum, after which it virtually fell from scholarly view until 1950. In 1958, Victor, Lord Rothschild sold it to the British Museum for £20,000, £2,000 of which was donated by the Art Fund (then the NACF). [44]

The cup forms part of the museum's Department of Prehistory and Europe rather than the Greece and Rome Department, and was previously on display, lit from behind, in Room 50. In 2015 it was on display with the new display of the Rothschild donation of the Waddesdon Bequest in Room 2A, with a changing internal lighting source that shows the colour change very effectively, though only one side of the cup can be seen. By October 2015 it was back in the re-opened Room 41.

While Room 41, where it was then displayed, was closed for refurbishment, from November 2012 to August 2013 it was on display with other British Museum pieces at The Art Institute of Chicago's Jaharis Galleries of Greek, Roman and Byzantine Art, [45] where it was very effectively displayed in a free-standing case, lit from above with changing light so that the colour change was clearly visible. [46] [47] It is considered able to travel to important exhibitions and in 2008 was exhibited in "Reflecting Antiquity, Modern Glass Inspired by Ancient Rome" at the Corning Museum of Glass in Corning, New York, in 2003 at the Hayward Gallery in London in "'Saved! 100 Years of the National Art Collections Fund", and in 1987 in "Glass of the Caesars" in the British Museum, Cologne, Milan, and Rome. [48]

Notes

  1. British Museum Highlights; Freestone, 270–273; see also this pdf with good images under both lights
  2. British Museum – The Lycurgus Cup
  3. Freestone, 271
  4. Harden, 248
  5. Corning Museum of Glass, Cage cups;Freestone, 270
  6. Williams, 342
  7. Freestone, 275; "Gold particles for imaging and Radiotherapy", 65–66
  8. Henderson, 63; see also Freestone, 272–273; originally published in Barber
  9. Barber
  10. Barber, 34; see also Henderson, 63
  11. Ashby, 30
  12. Harden, 248
  13. Williams, 342; Freestone, 274
  14. Harden, 248; Williams, 342, though Freeman, 274 reports "groups of regular fine parallel striations", and suggests the polishing was all done mechanically.
  15. By the glass historian Rosalinde Lierke (see also Hedwig glass). Roman glass in the Corning Museum of Glass, David Whitehouse, Corning Museum of Glass; Freestone, 273–274.
  16. Fleming, 92; see also Freestone, 273–274; for the Rubens Vase, see the Walters Art Museum page
  17. Freestone, 271
  18. Freestone, 275
  19. Harden, 245
  20. Metropolitan Museum of Art
  21. Freestone, 273, fig 6 a & 6b
  22. Kool, Lars; Bunschoten, Anton; Velders, Aldrik H.; Saggiomo, Vittorio (2019-02-12). "Gold nanoparticles embedded in a polymer as a 3D-printable dichroic nanocomposite material". Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology. 10 (1): 442–447. doi: 10.3762/bjnano.10.43 . ISSN   2190-4286. PMC   6404512 . PMID   30873314.
  23. Kool, Lars; Dekker, Floris; Bunschoten, Anton; Smales, Glen J.; Pauw, Brian R.; Velders, Aldrik H.; Saggiomo, Vittorio (2020-01-02). "Gold and silver dichroic nanocomposite in the quest for 3D printing the Lycurgus cup". Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology. 11 (1): 16–23. doi: 10.3762/bjnano.11.2 . ISSN   2190-4286. PMC   6964654 . PMID   31976193.
  24. Harden, 245, for all the iconography. Lycurgus is normally depicted naked, or very nearly so.
  25. photograph here in green and here in red Archived 2012-07-12 at archive.today
  26. Freestone, 271; British Museum image of Pan. The Pan figure is only illustrated at Harden, 247, out of the print sources seen.
  27. British Museum database image
  28. British Museum Highlights
  29. Freeman, 275
  30. Freestone, 275; the biography was of Julius Saturninus.
  31. Harden, 248, and those in next note
  32. Freestone, 271; More on the mosaics; see next note for a link to an image.
  33. PDF on classical precedents for Romanesque figures entwined with vines; fig. 7 is the Vienne mosaic, fig. 9 a partial view of the Piazza Armerini mosaic. Four other depictions of Lycurgus can be seen here.
  34. Brading mosaic
  35. Henig, 153
  36. Harden, 248
  37. Williams, 342; the British Museum Highlights has "4th century AD. Probably made in Rome". The dimensions are also from Williams and the Highlights; the Collection database has 15.88 cm (6.3 in) for the height, perhaps a difference arising from the remounting of the foot.
  38. Williams, 342, who says "gilt-bronze"; The BM database says "silver-gilt".
  39. British Museum database, where there are also photographs with the foot removed.
  40. Freestone, 271
  41. "il y a quelques années, entre les mains de M. Dubois", Harden, 247.
  42. Harden, 247
  43. Reist, Inge (ed.), "Le Gout Rothschild", in British Models of Art Collecting and the American Response: Reflections Across the Pond The Histories of Material Culture and Collecting, 1700–1950, p. 104, 2014, Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., ISBN   147243806X, 9781472438065, Google books
  44. Harden, 246; Art Fund website
  45. "Chicago Sun-Times". Archived from the original on 2013-05-14. Retrieved 2012-11-30.
  46. See videos on external links
  47. "55: Jaharis Galleries of Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Art". Ancient Art Podcast. January 25, 2013. Retrieved 15 June 2019.
  48. British Museum Database; Harden p. XI; see also Corning link above.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ambrosia</span> Mythical food of the Greek gods

In the ancient Greek myths, ambrosia is the food or drink of the Greek gods, and is often depicted as conferring longevity or immortality upon whoever consumed it. It was brought to the gods in Olympus by doves and served either by Hebe or by Ganymede at the heavenly feast.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Objet d'art</span> Small, nonfunctional work of art

In art history, the French term objet d’art describes an ornamental work of art, and the term objets d’art describes a range of works of art, usually small and three-dimensional, made of high-quality materials, and a finely-rendered finish that emphasises the aesthetics of the artefact. Artists create and produce objets d’art in the fields of the decorative arts and metalwork, porcelain and vitreous enamel; figurines, plaquettes, and engraved gems; ivory carvings and semi-precious hardstone carvings; tapestries, antiques, and antiquities; and books with fine bookbinding.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lycurgus of Thrace</span> Mythological king of the Edoni in Thrace

In Greek mythology, Lycurgus was the king of the Edoni in Thrace, son of Dryas, the "oak", and father of a son whose name was also Dryas.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Roman art</span> Art made in Ancient Rome and the territories it ruled

The art of Ancient Rome, and the territories of its Republic and later Empire, includes architecture, painting, sculpture and mosaic work. Luxury objects in metal-work, gem engraving, ivory carvings, and glass are sometimes considered to be minor forms of Roman art, although they were not considered as such at the time. Sculpture was perhaps considered as the highest form of art by Romans, but figure painting was also highly regarded. A very large body of sculpture has survived from about the 1st century BC onward, though very little from before, but very little painting remains, and probably nothing that a contemporary would have considered to be of the highest quality.

<i>Thiasus</i> Ecstatic retinue of the Greek deity Dionysus

In Greek mythology and religion, the thiasus was the ecstatic retinue of Dionysus, often pictured as inebriated revelers. Many of the myths of Dionysus are connected with his arrival in the form of a procession. The grandest such version was his triumphant return from "India", which influenced symbolic conceptions of the Roman triumph and was narrated in rapturous detail in Nonnus' Dionysiaca. In this procession, Dionysus rides a chariot, often drawn by big cats such as tigers, leopards, or lions, or alternatively elephants or centaurs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Romano-Germanic Museum</span> Archaeological museum in Cologne, Germany

The Roman-Germanic Museum is an archaeological museum in Cologne, Germany. It has a large collection of Roman artifacts from the Roman settlement of Colonia Claudia Ara Agrippinensium, on which modern Cologne is built. The museum protects the original site of a Roman town villa, from which a large Dionysus mosaic remains in its original place in the basement, and the related Roman Road just outside. In this respect the museum is an archaeological site.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cranberry glass</span> Red-colored glass made by adding gold to molten glass

Cranberry glass or 'Gold Ruby' glass is a red glass made by adding gold salts or colloidal gold to molten glass. Tin, in the form of stannous chloride, is sometimes added in tiny amounts as a reducing agent. The glass is used primarily in expensive decorations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dichroic glass</span> Glass which displays different colors under different lighting conditions

Dichroic glass is glass which can display multiple different colors depending on lighting conditions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anglo-Saxon glass</span>

Anglo-Saxon glass has been found across England during archaeological excavations of both settlement and cemetery sites. Glass in the Anglo-Saxon period was used in the manufacture of a range of objects including vessels, beads, windows and was even used in jewellery. In the 5th century AD with the Roman departure from Britain, there were also considerable changes in the usage of glass. Excavation of Romano-British sites have revealed plentiful amounts of glass but, in contrast, the amount recovered from 5th century and later Anglo-Saxon sites is minuscule.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cage cup</span> Luxury Late Roman glass vessel type

A cage cup, also vas diatretum, plural diatreta, or "reticulated cup" is a type of luxury late Roman glass vessel, found from roughly the 4th century, and "the pinnacle of Roman achievements in glass-making". Diatreta consist of an inner beaker and an outer cage or shell of decoration that stands out from the body of the cup, to which it is attached by short stems or shanks. About fifty cups or, more often, fragments have survived, and there are only a few in near-complete condition. Most have a cage with circular geometrical patterns, often with an "inscription", or phrase in letters above the reticulated area as well. Some have a flange, or zone of projecting open-cut moulding, above the lower patterns and below the lettering.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Roman glass</span> Ancient glass covered by a patina responsible of their iridescent hues of blue, green, and orange

Roman glass objects have been recovered across the Roman Empire in domestic, industrial and funerary contexts. Glass was used primarily for the production of vessels, although mosaic tiles and window glass were also produced. Roman glass production developed from Hellenistic technical traditions, initially concentrating on the production of intensely coloured cast glass vessels. However, during the 1st century AD the industry underwent rapid technical growth that saw the introduction of glass blowing and the dominance of colourless or 'aqua' glasses. Production of raw glass was undertaken in geographically separate locations to the working of glass into finished vessels, and by the end of the 1st century AD large scale manufacturing resulted in the establishment of glass as a commonly available material in the Roman world, and one which also had technically very difficult specialized types of luxury glass, which must have been very expensive.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hellenistic glass</span> Glass produced during the Hellenistic period

Hellenistic glass was glass produced during the Hellenistic period in the Mediterranean, Europe, western Asia and northern Africa. Glassmaking at this time was based on the technological traditions of the Classical antiquity and the Late Bronze Age, but was marked by transition from limited production of luxury objects made for the social elite to mass production of affordable glass vessels used by the broader public to satisfy everyday needs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Medieval stained glass</span> Coloured and painted glass of medieval Europe

Medieval stained glass is the coloured and painted glass of medieval Europe from the 10th century to the 16th century. For much of this period stained glass windows were the major pictorial art form, particularly in northern France, Germany and England, where windows tended to be larger than in southern Europe. In some countries, such as Sweden and England, only a small number of original stained windows has survived to this day.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stephen Knapp</span>

Stephen Knapp was an American artist best known for his use of the medium of lightpainting. A native of Worcester, Massachusetts, he gained an international reputation for large-scale works of art held in museums, public, corporate, and private collections, which are executed in media as diverse as light, kiln-formed glass, metal, stone, mosaic, and ceramic.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Roman mosaic</span> Style of mosaic from the Roman period

A Roman mosaic is a mosaic made during the Roman period, throughout the Roman Republic and later Empire. Mosaics were used in a variety of private and public buildings, on both floors and walls, though they competed with cheaper frescos for the latter. They were highly influenced by earlier and contemporary Hellenistic Greek mosaics, and often included famous figures from history and mythology, such as Alexander the Great in the Alexander Mosaic.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Waddesdon Bequest</span> Collection of Renaissance art in the British Museum

In 1898 Baron Ferdinand de Rothschild bequeathed to the British Museum as the Waddesdon Bequest the contents from his New Smoking Room at Waddesdon Manor. This consisted of a wide-ranging collection of almost 300 objets d'art et de vertu, which included exquisite examples of jewellery, plate, enamel, carvings, glass and maiolica. One of the earlier objects is the outstanding Holy Thorn Reliquary, probably created in the 1390s in Paris for John, Duke of Berry. The collection is in the tradition of a schatzkammer, or treasure house, such as those formed by the Renaissance princes of Europe; indeed, the majority of the objects are from late Renaissance Europe, although there are several important medieval pieces, and outliers from classical antiquity and medieval Syria.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gold glass</span> Type of glass with gold leaf between layers of glass

Gold glass or gold sandwich glass is a luxury form of glass where a decorative design in gold leaf is fused between two layers of glass. First found in Hellenistic Greece, it is especially characteristic of the Roman glass of the Late Empire in the 3rd and 4th century AD, where the gold decorated roundels of cups and other vessels were often cut out of the piece they had originally decorated and cemented to the walls of the catacombs of Rome as grave markers for the small recesses where bodies were buried. About 500 pieces of gold glass used in this way have been recovered. Complete vessels are far rarer. Many show religious imagery from Christianity, traditional Greco-Roman religion and its various cultic developments, and in a few examples Judaism. Others show portraits of their owners, and the finest are "among the most vivid portraits to survive from Early Christian times. They stare out at us with an extraordinary stern and melancholy intensity". From the 1st century AD the technique was also used for the gold colour in mosaics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Barber Cup and Crawford Cup</span>

The Barber Cup and Crawford Cup are two non-matching carved fluorite cups from about 50–100 AD. They were discovered during World War I by an Austro-Croatian officer who excavated a Roman tomb near the current Turkish–Syrian border. Both cups are now in the collection of the British Museum, which acquired the Crawford Cup in 1971 and the Barber Cup in 2004. The two cups are the only two vessels carved from fluorite that are known to have survived intact from the Roman period.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Boscoreale Treasure</span>

The Boscoreale Treasure is a large collection of exquisite silver and gold Roman objects discovered in the ruins of the ancient Villa della Pisanella at Boscoreale, near Pompeii, southern Italy. Consisting of over a hundred pieces of silverware, as well as gold coins and jewellery, it is now mostly kept at the Louvre Museum in Paris, although parts of the treasure can also be found at the British Museum.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Byzantine glass</span>

Byzantine glass objects highly resembled their earlier Hellenistic counterparts during the fourth and early fifth centuries CE in both form and function. Over the course of the fifth century CE, Byzantine glass blowers, based mostly in the area of Syria and Palestine, developed a distinct Byzantine style. While glass vessels continued to serve as the primary vehicles for pouring and drinking liquid, glassware for lighting, currency and commodity weights, window panes, and glass tesserae for mosaics and enamels also surged in popularity. Following the Arab conquests of the seventh century CE, large quantities of glass were imported from the Levant, which continued to produce raw and manufactured glass. Scholars once believed that glassware was an expensive luxury good reserved for the upper strata of society, however, recent archaeological excavations have unearthed a considerable quantity of unadorned glassware intended for lower-class residents.

References

Further reading