Hephthalite silver bowl

Last updated
Hephthalite silver bowl
SilverBowlNFPPakistan5-6thcenturyCE.JPG
The Hepthalite silver bowl in the British Museum.
Material Silver
Created460-479 CE
Discovered Swat region, Pakistan
35°07′N72°17′E / 35.12°N 72.29°E / 35.12; 72.29
Present location British Museum, London
Registration 1963, 1210.1
South Asia non political, with rivers.jpg
Red pog.svg
West Asia non political with water system.jpg
Red pog.svg
Pakistan relief location map.jpg
Red pog.svg
Gandhara locator map.jpg
Red pog.svg

The Hephthalite silver bowl is a bowl discovered in the Swat region of Gandhara, Pakistan, and now in the British Museum. [1] [2] It dates from 460 to 479 CE, and the images represent two different Huna tribes, suggesting a period of peaceful coexistence between the Kidarites and the Alchons.

Contents

Description

The bowl is dated to 460-479 CE, at the end of Kidarite rule and the beginning of Alchon ruler in northwestern India, although slightly earlier dates have also been suggested. [3] [4] [5]

The bowl represents a groups of four noble figures on horse, in the process of hunting animals. Despite its former attribution to the "Hephthalites", hence its long-standing name, the bowl is thought to represent two Kidarite noble hunters wearing their characteristic crowns, and two Alchons, with their characteristic skull deformation, one of the Alchons reappearing in portrait inside a medallion at the bottom of the bowl. This combination of two different Huna tribes in the same work of art suggests a period of peaceful coexistence between the Kidarites and the Alchons, who may have each been in control of their own territory, although the Alchons would eventually replace the Kidarites in Gandhara. [5] This understanding of the iconography of the Hephthalite silver bowl is the result of a general scholarly consensus. [6]

At one point, the Kidarites withdrew from Gandhara, and the Alchons took over their territory and their mints, from the time of Khingila. [3] By 520, Gandhara was definitely under Hephthalite (Alchon Huns) control, according to Chinese pilgrims. [7]

Inscription

The bowl contains an inscription in Brahmi script, next to the head of one of the Alchon hunters. Scholars have disagreed on the reading, but it has been suggested it could be the name of the Alchon ruler Khingila. [8] The comparison with the Brahmi lettering for his name on the later coinage of Khingila indeed may suggest that the name Khingila is intended in the vase inscription, even though the dot-by-dot engraving is rather clumsy and does not perfectly match standard typography. [8]

Hephthalite silver bowl inscription, Khingila on his later coinage, Khingila name in Middle Brahmi script.jpg

Views

Other examples

The Chilek bowl, with an Alchon Hun ruler in the central medallion. Hunnic silver vase, Chilek near Smarkand, second third of 5th century CE.jpg
The Chilek bowl, with an Alchon Hun ruler in the central medallion.

Other examples of very similar silver bowls have been found in the area of Samarkand, including the "Chilek bowl" ("Čilek bowl"), considered as the "best known specimen of Hephthalite art", which is similar in composition with the Hephthalite silver bowl, but represents "six dancers in Indian costume with Iranian ribbons and Hephthalite-short heads". It, too, is considered as an Alchon object, but possibly manufactured in India at the request of the Alchons. It is now in the Samarkand Museum. [9] [10] [11]

The man in the medallion at the bottom of the Chilek bowl has a clearly elongated skull, characteristic of the Alchons Huns. [12]

See also

Related Research Articles

The Hephthalites, sometimes called the White Huns, were a people who lived in Central Asia during the 5th to 8th centuries CE, part of the larger group of the Iranian Huns. They formed an empire, the Imperial Hephthalites, and were militarily important from 450 CE, when they defeated the Kidarites, to 560 CE, when combined forces from the First Turkic Khaganate and the Sasanian Empire defeated them. After 560 CE, they established "principalities" in the area of Tokharistan, under the suzerainty of the Western Turks and of the Sasanian Empire, before the Tokhara Yabghus took over in 625.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Xionites</span> 4th–6th-century Bactrian-speaking nomadic people of Central Asia

Xionites, Chionites, or Chionitae were a nomadic people in the Central Asian regions of Transoxiana and Bactria.

The Kidarites, or Kidara Huns, were a dynasty that ruled Bactria and adjoining parts of Central Asia and South Asia in the 4th and 5th centuries. The Kidarites belonged to a complex of peoples known collectively in India as the Huna, and in Europe as the Chionites, and may even be considered as identical to the Chionites. The 5th century Byzantine historian Priscus called them Kidarite Huns, or "Huns who are Kidarites". The Huna/Xionite tribes are often linked, albeit controversially, to the Huns who invaded Eastern Europe during a similar period. They are entirely different from the Hephthalites, who replaced them about a century later.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kushano-Sasanian Kingdom</span> Branch of Sasanian Persians ruling Bactria (c. 230–365)

The Kushano-Sasanian Kingdom was a polity established by the Sasanian Empire in Bactria during the 3rd and 4th centuries. The Sasanian Empire captured the provinces of Sogdia, Bactria and Gandhara from the declining Kushan Empire following a series of wars in 225 CE. The local Sasanian governors then went on to take the title of Kushanshah or "King of the Kushans", and to mint coins. They are sometimes considered as forming a "sub-kingdom" inside the Sasanian Empire.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Khingila I</span> Founding king of the Alchon Huns (c. 430–490)

Khingila I was the founding king of the Hunnic Alkhan dynasty. He was a contemporary of Khushnavaz.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Toramana</span> Ruler of the Alchon Huns

Toramana also called Toramana Shahi Jauvla was a king of the Alchon Huns who ruled in northern India in the late 5th and the early 6th century CE. Toramana consolidated the Alchon power in Punjab, and conquered northern and central India including Eran in Madhya Pradesh. Toramana used the title "Great King of Kings", equivalent to "Emperor", in his inscriptions, such as the Eran boar inscription.

Hunas or Huna was the name given by the ancient Indians to a group of Central Asian tribes who, via the Khyber Pass, entered the Indian subcontinent at the end of the 5th or early 6th century. The Hunas occupied areas as far south as Eran and Kausambi, greatly weakening the Gupta Empire. The Hunas were ultimately defeated by a coalition of Indian princes that included an Indian king Yasodharman and the Gupta emperor, Narasimhagupta. They defeated a Huna army and their ruler Mihirakula in 528 CE and drove them out of India. The Guptas are thought to have played only a minor role in this campaign.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Central Asian art</span> History of visual art in Asias central region

Central Asian art is visual art created in Central Asia, in areas corresponding to modern Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, Afghanistan, and parts of modern Mongolia, China and Russia. The art of ancient and medieval Central Asia reflects the rich history of this vast area, home to a huge variety of peoples, religions and ways of life. The artistic remains of the region show a remarkable combinations of influences that exemplify the multicultural nature of Central Asian society. The Silk Road transmission of art, Scythian art, Greco-Buddhist art, Serindian art and more recently Persianate culture, are all part of this complicated history.

The Nezak Huns, also Nezak Shahs, was a significant principality in the south of the Hindu Kush region of South Asia from circa 484 to 665 CE. Despite being traditionally identified as the last of the Hunnic states, their ethnicity remains disputed and speculative. The dynasty is primarily evidenced by coinage inscribing a characteristic water-buffalo-head crown and an eponymous legend.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alchon Huns</span> 370–670 CE nomadic people who invaded India

The Alchon Huns, also known as the Alkhan, Alchono, Alxon, Alkhon, Alakhana, and Walxon, were a nomadic people who established states in Central Asia and South Asia during the 4th and 6th centuries CE. They were first mentioned as being located in Paropamisus, and later expanded south-east, into the Punjab and Central India, as far as Eran and Kausambi. The Alchon invasion of the Indian subcontinent eradicated the Kidarite Huns who had preceded them by about a century, and contributed to the fall of the Gupta Empire, in a sense bringing an end to Classical India.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kidara I</span> Kidarites

Kidara I fl. 350-390 CE) was the first major ruler of the Kidarite Kingdom, which replaced the Indo-Sasanians in northwestern India, in the areas of Kushanshahr, Gandhara, Kashmir and Punjab.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mehama</span> Ruler of the Alchon Huns

Mehama, ruled c.461-493, was a king of Alchon Huns dynasty. He is little known, but the Talagan copper scroll mentions him as an active ruler making a donation to a Buddhist stupa in 492/93. At that time, it is considered that the Alchon Huns were firmly in charge of the Buddhist region around Taxila, but had not yet started to conquer the Indian mainland.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Iranian Huns</span> Term roughly equivalent to Huna people

The term Iranian Huns is sometimes used for a group of different tribes that lived in Central Asia, in the historical regions of Transoxiana, Bactria, Tokharistan, Kabul Valley, and Gandhara, overlapping with the modern-day Afghanistan, Tajikistan, Uzebekistan, Eastern Iran, Pakistan, and Northwest India, between the fourth and seventh centuries. They also threatened the Northeast borders of Sasanian Iran and forced the Shahs to lead many ill-documented campaigns against them.

The origin of the Huns and their relationship to other peoples identified in ancient sources as Iranian Huns such as the Xionites, the Alchon Huns, the Kidarites, the Hephthalites, the Nezaks, and the Huna, has been the subject of long-term scholarly controversy. Ancient Greek and Roman sources do not provide any information on where the European Huns came from, besides that they suddenly appeared in 370 CE. However, there are some possible mentions of the Huns or tribes related to them that pre-date 370. Chinese sources, meanwhile, indicate several different, sometimes contradictory origins for the various "Iranian Hun" groups. In 1757, Joseph de Guignes first proposed that the Huns and the Iranian Huns were identical to the Xiongnu. The thesis was then popularized by Edward Gibbon. Since that time scholars have debated the proposal on its linguistic, historical, and archaeological merits. In the mid-twentieth century, the connection was attacked by the Sinologist Otto J. Maenchen-Helfen and largely fell out of favor. Some recent scholarship has argued in favor of some form of link, and the theory returned to the mainstream, but there is no consensus on the issue. It also remains disputed whether the various “Iranian Huns” belonged to a single or multiple ethnic groups.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">State Museum of History of Culture of Uzbekistan</span>

The State Museum of Culture History of Uzbekistan is a museum of history and culture in Samarkand.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Seal of Khingila</span> Historical seal from the region of Bactria

The Seal of Khingila is an historical seal from the region of Bactria, on southern Central Asia. The seal was published recently by Pierfrancesco Callieri and Nicholas Sims-Williams. It is now in the private collection of Mr. A. Saeedi (London). Kurbanov considers it as a significant Hephthalite seal. It has also been considered as intermediate between the Kidarites and the Hephthalites.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tobazini</span>

Tobazini, Gobazini or Goboziko was a ruler of southern Central Asia. He is only known from his coinage, found in Bactria and Northern Afghanistan. The legends on his coins are in Bactrian, but they are often difficult to read: a typical legend reads t/gobazini/o šauo "King Tobazini". Tobazini is often considered one of the last rulers of the Kidarites, circa 450 CE.

<i>Chilek silver bowl</i>

The Chilek silver bowl is a silver bowl found in the area of Samarkand, and considered as the "best known specimen of Hephthalite art". More specifically, the bowl seems to belong to the Alchon Huns, south of the Hindu-Kush, during the last third of the 5th century CE. The Alchons have long been considered as a part or a sub-division of the Hephthalites, or as their eastern branch, but now tend to be considered as a separate entity.

The rise of the Great Kushans in Bactria and Northwestern India during the first century CE significantly altered the geopolitical landscape, impacting trade routes, international relations, and regional power dynamics. Acting as intermediaries in trade, they controlled key sections of the Silk Road, redirecting commerce between China, India, and the East away from Parthian territory, challenging Parthian economic dominance.

The Hunnic invasion of the Gupta Empire was a pivotal event in ancient Indian history, facilitated by the administrative structure of the Gupta Empire, notably its feudal system. This structure allowed the Huna king to garner support from local chiefs, aiding in their invasion. The inscriptions discovered in Eran shed light on this dynamic.

References

  1. British Museum notice
  2. Harper, Prudence Oliver; N.Y.), Metropolitan Museum of Art (New York; Meyers, Pieter. Silver Vessels of the Sasanian Period: Royal imagery. Metropolitan Museum of Art. pp. 129–131. ISBN   978-0-87099-248-3.
  3. 1 2 ALRAM, MICHAEL (2014). "From the Sasanians to the Huns New Numismatic Evidence from the Hindu Kush". The Numismatic Chronicle. 174: 274–275. ISSN   0078-2696.
  4. Sims, Vice-President Eleanor G.; Sims, Eleanor; Marshak, Boris Ilʹich; Grube, Ernst J.; I, Boris Marshak. Peerless Images: Persian Painting and Its Sources. Yale University Press. pp. 13–14. ISBN   978-0-300-09038-3.
  5. 1 2 Bakker, Hans T. The Alkhan: A Hunnic People in South Asia. Barkhuis. p. 26. ISBN   978-94-93194-00-7.
  6. "There exists to date a general consensus regarding the iconographic interpretation of the bowl from Swat" in Bakker, Hans T. The Alkhan: A Hunnic People in South Asia. Barkhuis. p. 26. ISBN   978-94-93194-00-7.
  7. The Huns, Hyun Jin Kim, Routledge, 2015 p.50 sq
  8. 1 2 Bakker, Hans T. The Alkhan: A Hunnic People in South Asia. Barkhuis. pp. 43–47. ISBN   978-94-93194-00-7.
  9. Brentjes, B. (1971). "The Hoard of Hephthalite Silver Vessels Found near Samarkand". East and West. 21 (1/2): 77–78. ISSN   0012-8376.
  10. Kurbanov, Aydogdy (2014). "The hephthalites: iconographical materials" (PDF). Tyragetia. VIII [XXIII]: 328.
  11. GRAY, BASIL (1991). "Post-Sasanian Metalwork". Bulletin of the Asia Institute. 5: 61. ISSN   0890-4464.
  12. Bakker, Hans T. The Alkhan: A Hunnic People in South Asia. Barkhuis. p. 24. ISBN   978-94-93194-00-7.
  13. Ancient Iranian metal art (PDF). Arthur M. Sackler Gallery. pp. 165–168.