Archaeology of Angola

Last updated

Archaeological explorations in Angola have been carried out since the late 19th century. Much of the early research was funded and led by Portuguese colonial interests in Angola, fueled by the Scramble for Africa. The 1890 British Ultimatum on the expansion of the Portuguese Empire led to the latter's further emphasis on colonial development in central Africa, including Angola, and the exploration of its cultural resources to strengthen its colonial system. In the 20th century, archaeology in Angola focused largely on the Stone Age, driven by colonial interests in evolutionary anthropology, until Angolan independence in 1975. During that time, several research institutions and museums were opened, and fieldwork was largely tied to mission trips into the country to document the cultures of native Angolans. In recent decades, partnerships have formed between Angolan archaeologists and those from France and Portugal to continue research. Calls to repatriate artifacts back to Angola from overseas collections have also gained momentum in recent decades.

Contents

History of archaeology

19th century

Early ethnographic and linguistic map of central Africa, 1890 185 of 'Expedicao portugueza ao Muatianvua. Ethnographia e historia tradicional dos povos da Lunda ... Edicao illustrada por H. Casanova. (With plates and maps.)' (11204887944).jpg
Early ethnographic and linguistic map of central Africa, 1890

During the 19th century, Europeans exploring Africa began recording the presence of archaeological sites along their routes. The earliest such record was made by James Hingston Tuckey during his 1816 excavation along the River Congo. Tuckey recorded the presence of a rock shelter with petroglyphs at Pedra de Feitiço. [1]

The earliest organized archaeological explorations of Angola were spearheaded by colonial interests—particularly of the Portuguese, who had begun colonizing Angola in 1575—as the Scramble for Africa began. New governmental agencies, such as the Lisbon Geographic Society in 1875 and the Commissão de Cartographia in 1883, were formed to explore and map the interior regions of Angola and the rest of the Portuguese Empire by sending missions into previously-unexplored areas. [2] Explorers Hermenegildo Capelo and Roberto Ivens led expeditions in Angola in 1877 and again in 1884–1885, and their findings were some of the earliest compiled on central African archaeology and ethnography. [3] Ricardo Servero also collected artifacts during his ethnological visits to the region. His report on a few stone tools given to him by an acquaintance became the first published material on Angolan archaeological artifacts in 1890. [1]

Following the 1890 British Ultimatum, Portuguese interests turned to establishing its colonial foothold in its already-occupied territories, including Angola. [3]

1890–1974

As the 20th century progressed, Portuguese interests in the ethnographic history of central Africa grew. During this period, political interest in more effectively governing Angola joined with academic interests in the ethnology of its native peoples. Particular attention was paid to Angola, as its landscape yielded abundant natural resources that supported a profitable mining industry. During the excavations of these mines, hundreds of archaeological sites were uncovered. [4] [5] The Companhia de Diamantes de Angola (Diamang) had control of over 30,000 square kilometres (12,000 sq mi) in northeast Angola and subsequently funded archaeological research in its territory, later expanding to found museums and other research institutions. [5] The building of railroads also caused the discovery of more artifacts, the first of which were found by Fernando Mouta, headchief of the Serviço de Geologia e Minas de Angola (SGMA). Mouta published the first map of lithic assemblages in Angola in 1934. [6]

José Leite de Vasconcelos, the director of the National Museum of Archaeology, Lisbon, Portugal, published another article that included prehistoric Angolan stone tools in 1913. [1] The 1934 Congresso Nacional de Antropologia Colonial do Porto published by explorer Joaquim Santos Júnior documented his findings while on expedition with Alexandre de Serpa Pinto. [7]

The establishment of the Estado Novo brought with it an increased push to justify Portuguese colonial rule. Several new institutions, such as the Portuguese Academy of History, were established with this goal in mind; and others were restructured, as was the Commissão de Cartographia absorbed into the National Board for Geographical Missions and Colonial Research. [8] Diamang established a cultural heritage museum in 1942 at its headquarters in Dundo to house the many artifacts its operations had by then uncovered, as well as hosting modern pieces of heritage donated from the local area. The Dundo Museum supported further research endeavours in Angola and became one of the most prominent research institutions in sub-Saharan Africa. Several archaeologists, including Henri Breuil, John Desmond Clark, and Louis Leakey were drawn to the area to explore the Congo Basin's Stone Age history. [9] Clark published The Distribution of Prehistoric Culture in Angola in 1966, one of the most important works for Angolan Stone Age research. [10]

In the 1940s, efforts to understand the palaeontology and archaeology of sub-Saharan Africa began being consolidated. The 1947 Pan-African Congress on Prehistory, the first such annual convention, was attended by Mouta and other local archaeologists representing Angola's presence. This spurred increased attention on Angola's archaeological potential. [6] New museums and collections opened in Angola, including the Sá da Bandeira Mission and the Regional Museum of Huíla. [6] A bulletin, the Junta de Investigação do Ultramar, was founded in 1950 and published all material on Angolan anthropology and archaeology. [11] In 1959, the Scientific Research Institute of Angola (IICA) was founded to oversee all archaeological research efforts in Angola. [6]

However, contemporary studies followed a school of thought, solidified by Portuguese anthropologist António Mendes Correia, favouring physical anthropology over archaeology, as native populations were to be evaluated for work purposes. Thus, only about 25% of fieldwork on mission trips was dedicated to archaeology, the rest reserved for studying the physical attributes of Angolans. [11] Additionally, what archaeology was performed heavily focused on the Stone Age and evolutionary implications for Angola. Bruno Pastre Máximo wrote in 2020, "The major objective of these “scientific” incursions was to provide the Salazar with arguments which would justify the maintenance of the status quo and the empire, based essentially on the decadent concept of “inferior races” and on the contrast between “barbarian and civilized.” [12]

The Anthrobiological Mission of Angola, led by António de Almeida, took place between 1948 and 1955 with the intention of documenting the ethnology, languages, and history of Angola. Most of its archaeological excavations relied on maps that had been produced by the SGMA. Thousands of artifacts were excavated and taken back to Portugal. [6] In 1950, José Camarate França joined the mission and became one of the leading archaeologists in Angola until his death in 1963. [13]

Archaeological excavations in Angola stalled until 1966, following the death Camarate França and the busy schedules of other academics. [14] Miguel Fonseca Ramos, initially a student of geology, was chosen to lead new excavations in 1966 as part of the Mission of Archaeological Studies in Southwest Angola (MEASA). By the time the mission concluded in 1967, 103,000 artifacts had been excavated and 11 new sites identified. Under the direction of the IICA, the University of Luanda's School of Arts and Humanities began teaching anthropology and archaeology classes in 1970, led by Joaquim Santos Júnior. Most of the faculty were from institutions in Portugal. [15] The development of this department began to distance Angolan anthropology from its colonial purpose, as academics began taking a more scientific and critical approach to research. [16]

1975–2002

National Archaeological Museum in Benguela 2015 Museu Nacional de Arqueologia Benguela Angola 19669386368 (cropped).jpg
National Archaeological Museum in Benguela

The 1974 Carnation Revolution brought an end to Portuguese colonial rule in Angola, halting any ongoing archaeological research by the Portuguese academics as many fled the country. [17] While many institutions and museums were closed, others were integrated into the new government. [18] Ramos created the Center of Prehistory and Archaeology during this restructure in 1983. [19] The National Laboratory of Anthropology continued operations from Soyo, and the National Archaeological Museum opened in 1979 in Benguela. The museum's curator, L. Pais Pinto, led new excavations at previously-explored sites in the 1980s. As part of Martin Pickford and Brigitte Senut's larger Southern African archaeological project, further excavations were carried out by the Angola Paleontology Expedition in 1989 in partnership with the Collège de France. [20]

2002–present

The end of the Angolan Civil War allowed increased collaboration with international archaeologists and organizations, especially those from France and Portugal. New academic programs were introduced. Much of the new research is being done on rock art in the Ebo Valley. [21] As part of a project by the Polytechnic Institute of Tomar and the Geosciences Center of Coimbra University to document rock art in Angola, 14 new rock shelters were discovered in 2014. [22]

Repatriation

Figurine from the Bakongo culture in the British Museum AF1954,13.1 Figura (51601993442).jpg
Figurine from the Bakongo culture in the British Museum

Efforts to repatriate archaeological artifacts and human remains back to Angola from international institutions have gained traction in recent years. During colonial rule, Angolan cultural heritage objects and human remains were removed from the country and placed in museums, institutions, and private collections. [23] Thousands of archaeological artifacts were taken back to Portugal by Portuguese archaeologists for further study and display in museums. [24] In the 1920s, Amandus Johnson travelled across Angola and collected artifacts for the Penn Museum at the University of Pennsylvania, United States. [25]

Sindika Dokolo began purchasing artwork from the private collections of Hans Bogatzke. He then established the Sindika Dokolo Foundation, which had accrued over 5,000 pieces of artwork in by 2018. The foundation aims to repatriate works of art and artifacts back to the Chokwe people in Angola, many of which were looted from museums during the civil war. [23]

Sites

John Desmond Clark divided Angola's Stone Age sites into three geographic regions, which all meet at a central point near Huambo: the Southwest, containing the highlands and plateaus, as well as most of the Angola's Atlantic Coast; the Congo in the north, from the Congo Basin south to the Cuanza River; and Zambezi in the southeast, comprising the Zambezi, Cuando, and Cubango River watershed regions. [26] [27] During the early years of mining operations, the northeastern corner of the Congo region was well-explored by Diamang-associated archaeologists. [26]

However, the Southwest region has yielded the most known archaeological sites and is the area where research, particularly of the Stone Age, has been most concentrated. [10] The Humpata Plateau alone has yielded multiple sites in its many caverns and rifts. Sites such as Leba Cave have yielded stone tools from the entirety of the Stone Age, as well as faunal remains and hominin fossils. [28] [29] The coastal area itself contains multiple sites dating back to the Miocene and Pleistocene and has yielded evidence that Acheuleans may have been scavenging beached whales up to 600,000 years Before Present (BP). [30]

There is a distinct lack of Iron Age and post-European contact archaeology in Angola, as interest was historically concentrated on older sites. Angola's first UNESCO World Heritage Site, M'banza-Kongo, was recognized in 2017. [19]

Notable sites

M'banza-Kongo, 1766 La citta di Bansa, detta altrimenti S. Salvatore, capitale del regno del Congo, nell'Africa, 1766 - BEIC IE8959542.jpg
M'banza-Kongo, 1766

Notable archaeologists

See also

Related Research Articles

Ur was an important Sumerian city-state in ancient Mesopotamia, located at the site of modern Tell el-Muqayyar in Dhi Qar Governorate, southern Iraq. Although Ur was once a coastal city near the mouth of the Euphrates on the Persian Gulf, the coastline has shifted and the city is now well inland, on the south bank of the Euphrates, 16 km (10 mi) from Nasiriyah in modern-day Iraq. The city dates from the Ubaid period c. 3800 BC, and is recorded in written history as a city-state from the 26th century BC, its first recorded king being King Tuttues.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Great Zimbabwe</span> Ruins of a medieval city in southeast Zimbabwe

Great Zimbabwe is a city in the south-eastern hills of the modern country of Zimbabwe, near Lake Mutirikwe and the town of Masvingo. It is thought to have been the capital of a kingdom during the Late Iron Age. Construction on the city began in the 11th century and continued until it was abandoned in the 15th century. The edifices were erected by ancestors of the Shona people, currently located in Zimbabwe and nearby countries. The stone city spans an area of 7.22 square kilometres (2.79 sq mi) and could have housed up to 18,000 people at its peak, giving it a population density of approximately 2,500 inhabitants per square kilometre (6,500/sq mi). It is recognised as a World Heritage Site by UNESCO.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Penn Museum</span> Archaeological museum

Penn Museum, formerly known as The University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, is an archaeology and anthropology museum at the University of Pennsylvania. It is located on Penn's campus in the University City neighborhood of Philadelphia, at the intersection of 33rd and South Streets. It also is close enough for Drexel University students to walk or take SEPTA transportation services. Housing over 1.3 million artifacts, the museum features one of the most comprehensive collections of Middle and Near-Eastern art in the world.

Ivor Noël Hume, OBE was a British-born archaeologist who did research in the United States. A former director of Colonial Williamsburg’s archaeological research program and the author of more than 20 books, he was heralded by his peers as the "father of historical archaeology".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eduardo Matos Moctezuma</span> Mexican archaeologist (born 1940)

Eduardo Matos Moctezuma is a Mexican archaeologist. From 1978 to 1982 he directed excavations at the Templo Mayor, the remains of a major Aztec pyramid in central Mexico City.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Max Uhle</span> German archaeologist

Friedrich Max Uhle was a German archaeologist, whose work in Peru, Chile, Ecuador and Bolivia at the turn of the Twentieth Century had a significant impact on the practice of archaeology of South America.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gertrude Caton Thompson</span> British archaeologist (1888–1985)

Gertrude Caton Thompson, was an English archaeologist at a time when participation by women in the discipline was uncommon. Much of her archaeological work was conducted in Egypt. However, she also worked on expeditions in Zimbabwe, Malta, and South Arabia. Her notable contributions to the field of archaeology include creating a technique for excavating archaeological sites and information on Paleolithic to Predynastic civilizations in Zimbabwe and Egypt. Caton Thompson held many official positions in organizations such as the Prehistoric Society and the Royal Anthropological Institute.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology</span> Museum in Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.

The Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology is a museum affiliated with Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States. Founded in 1866, the Peabody Museum is one of the oldest and largest museums focusing on anthropological material, with particular focus on the ethnography and archaeology of the Americas. The museum is caretaker to over 1.2 million objects, some 900 feet (270 m) of documents, 2,000 maps and site plans, and about 500,000 photographs. The museum is located at Divinity Avenue on the Harvard University campus. The museum is one of the four Harvard Museums of Science and Culture open to the public.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Archaeology</span> Study of human activity via material culture

Archaeology or archeology is the study of human activity through the recovery and analysis of material culture. The archaeological record consists of artifacts, architecture, biofacts or ecofacts, sites, and cultural landscapes. Archaeology can be considered both a social science and a branch of the humanities. It is usually considered an independent academic discipline, but may also be classified as part of anthropology, history or geography.

In the 1920s in Angola mining became the primary source of revenue for the colonial government.

Joe Ben Wheat (1916–1997) was an American archaeologist, curator, teacher, and author known for his expertise on woven textiles produced by the Navajo and other Native American tribes in Arizona, New Mexico, and Colorado. His research also focused on Mogollon, Anasazi, Great Plains Paleo-Indian, and African Paleolithic archaeology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Qal'at al-Bahrain</span> Archaeological site in Bahrain

The Qal'at al-Bahrain, also known as the Bahrain Fort or Portuguese Fort, is an archaeological site located in Bahrain. Archaeological excavations carried out since 1954 have unearthed antiquities from an artificial mound of 12 m (39 ft) height containing seven stratified layers, created by various occupants from 2300 BC up to the 18th century, including Kassites, Greeks, Portuguese and Persians. It was once the capital of the Dilmun civilization and was inscribed as a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 2005.

Benjamin Irving Rouse was an American archaeologist on the faculty of Yale University best known for his work in the Greater and Lesser Antilles of the Caribbean, especially in Haiti. He also conducted fieldwork in Florida and Venezuela. He made major contributions to the development of archaeological theory, with a special emphasis on taxonomy and classification of archaeological materials and studies of human migration.

Hannah Marie Wormington was an American archaeologist known for her writings and fieldwork on southwestern and Paleo-Indians archaeology over a long career that lasted almost sixty years.

The Anzick site (24PA506), located adjacent to Flathead Creek, a tributary of the Shields River in Wilsall, Park County, Montana, United States, is the only known Clovis burial site in the New World. The term "Clovis" is used by archaeologists to define one of the New World's earliest hunter-gatherer cultures and is named after the site near Clovis, New Mexico, where human artifacts were found associated with the procurement and processing of mammoth and other large and small fauna.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Songo Mnara</span> World Heritage Site in Tanzania

Songo Mnara is a historic Swahiili settlement in located on Songo Mnara Island in Pande Mikoma, Kilwa District in Lindi Region of Tanzania. The island is home to a Medieval Swahili stone town. The stone town was occupied from the 14th to 16th centuries. Songo Mnara has been recognized as a UNESCO World Heritage Site, along with nearby stone town Kilwa Kisiwani. In total, archaeologists have found six mosques, four cemeteries, and two dozen house blocks along with three enclosed open spaces on the island. Songo Mnara was constructed from rough-coral and mortar. This stonetown was built as one of many trade towns on the Indian Ocean. The site is a registered National Historic Site.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Archaeology of Igbo-Ukwu</span> Archaeology done in the town of Igbo-Ukwu, Southeastern Nigeria

The archaeology of Igbo-Ukwu is the study of an archaeological site located in a town of the same name: Igbo-Ukwu, an Igbo town in Anambra State in southeastern Nigeria. As a result of these findings, three excavation areas at Igbo-Ukwu were opened in 1959 and 1964 by Charles Thurstan Shaw: Igbo Richard, Igbo Isaiah, and Igbo Jonah. Excavations revealed more than 700 high quality artifacts of copper, bronze and iron, as well as about 165,000 glass, carnelian and stone beads, pottery, textiles and ivory beads, cups, and horns. The bronzes include numerous ritual vessels, pendants, crowns, breastplates, staff ornaments, swords, and fly-whisk handles.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ruwayda</span> Archaeological site in Qatar

Ruwayda is a ruined town in northern Qatar. Extending over a length of 2.5 km along the coastline, it constitutes one of Qatar's largest archaeological sites as well as containing its largest fort. The town was likely inhabited from the 1500s to the late 1700s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dolmen de Soto</span> Neolithic subterranean structure in Trigueros, Andalucía, Spain

The Dolmen de Soto is a Neolithic subterranean structure in Trigueros, Andalucía, Spain. It is estimated it was built between 4,500 and 5,000 years ago and is one of about 200 neolithic ritual-burial sites in the province of Huelva.

The Dundo Museum, officially the Dundo Regional Museum and formerly called the Dungo Ethnographic Museum, is a national ethnographic and natural history museum in Dundo, Lunda Norte Province, Angola. It was founded in 1936 by the Diamang company, making it the country's first museum. It is considered one of the country's most important museums and one of the most important cultural museums in Africa. It focuses primarily on preserving artifacts related to the heritage and culture of eastern Angolan groups, particularly the Chokwe people, and also has natural history and archaeological collections. Several objects were looted during the Angolan Civil War and repatriation efforts are ongoing. On 18 April 2016, it was named a regional cultural reference monument.

References

Citations

  1. 1 2 3 de Matos et al. 2021, p. 320.
  2. ↑ de Matos et al. 2021, p. 321; de Matos 2015, p. 33.
  3. 1 2 de Matos et al. 2021, p. 322.
  4. ↑ de Matos et al. 2021, pp. 322–323.
  5. 1 2 Pastre Máximo 2020, p. 525.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 de Matos et al. 2021, p. 324.
  7. ↑ Pastre Máximo 2020, p. 524.
  8. ↑ de Matos et al. 2021, p. 322; de Matos 2015, p. 33.
  9. ↑ de Matos et al. 2021, p. 323.
  10. 1 2 de Matos et al. 2021, p. 329.
  11. 1 2 Pastre Máximo 2020, p. 526.
  12. ↑ Pastre Máximo 2020, p. 527.
  13. 1 2 de Matos 2015, pp. 34–35.
  14. ↑ de Matos et al. 2021, p. 325.
  15. ↑ de Matos et al. 2021, pp. 325–327.
  16. ↑ Pastre Máximo 2020, pp. 527–528.
  17. ↑ de Matos et al. 2021, p. 327.
  18. ↑ de Matos et al. 2021, p. 334.
  19. 1 2 de Matos et al. 2021, p. 336.
  20. ↑ de Matos et al. 2021, pp. 334–335.
  21. ↑ Oosterbeek 2013.
  22. ↑ de Matos et al. 2021, pp. 335–336.
  23. 1 2 Scher, Robin (26 June 2018). "Back to Where They Once Belonged: Proponents of Repatriation of African Artworks Take Issue with the Past—and Present and Future". ARTnews . Retrieved 25 June 2024.
  24. ↑ de Matos et al. 2021.
  25. ↑ Scott, Monique (2024). "Excavating Whiteness in the African Archive: The Story of Amandus Johnson's 1920s Expedition to Angola for the Penn Museum". Museum Anthropology. 47 (1): 23–31. doi:10.1111/muan.12285 . Retrieved 26 June 2024– via Wiley Online Library.
  26. 1 2 Rudner 1976, p. 99.
  27. ↑ Oosterbeek 2013, p. 18.
  28. ↑ de Matos 2015, p. 34.
  29. ↑ de Matos et al. 2023, p. 3.
  30. 1 2 de Matos et al. 2023, p. 2.
  31. ↑ Gutierrez, Manuel; Benjamin, Maria Helena, eds. (2019). Recherches archéologiques à Baia Farta (Benguela-Angola)/Pesquisas arqueológicas na Baia Farta (Benguela-Angola)[Archaeological research in Baia Farta (Benguela-Angola)] (in French and Portuguese). Nanterre, Paris: L'Harmattan. ISBN   978-2-343-17441-9.
  32. ↑ Piquete, Valter; Pereira, Telmo; Cunha Ribeiro, João Pedro P.G.; de Matos, Daniela (2023). "Early or Middle Stone Age? The lithic assemblage of Capangombe – Santo António, Namibe Province (Angola) / Âge de la Pierre ancien ou moyen ? L'ensemble lithique de Capangombe – Santo António, Province de Namibe (Angola)". L'Anthropologie. 127 (5). doi:10.1016/j.anthro.2023.103214 . Retrieved 26 June 2024.
  33. ↑ Gutierrez, Manuel (2009). "Rock Art and Religion: The Site of Pedra do Feitiço, Angola". The South African Archaeological Bulletin. 64 (189): 51–60. JSTOR   40588135 . Retrieved 25 June 2024– via JSTOR.
  34. ↑ Rudner 1976, p. 103.
  35. ↑ Rudner 1976, pp. 103–104.

Bibliography

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.