Battle of Wanat

Battle of Wanat
Part of the War in Afghanistan
U.S. Army soldiers guarding Vehicle Patrol Base Kahler the day before the battle.
Date July 13, 2008 Location Nuristan Province, Afghanistan 35°03′09″N70°54′27″E / 35.0525°N 70.9075°E / 35.0525; 70.9075 (Battle of Wanat) Result American Victory
Belligerents
United States Afghanistan	Taliban
Commanders and leaders
Cpt. Matthew Myer Lt. Jonathan Brostrom  †	Sheikh Dost Mohammad [1] [2] Maulavi Uthman Sadiq Munibullah
Units involved
U.S. Army 173rd Airborne Brigade Combat Team 2nd Battalion, 503rd Airborne Chosen Company 2nd Platoon Afghan National Army	No specific units
Strength
48 soldiers 24 soldiers Close air support [3]	200 [3] –500 [4] insurgents
Casualties and losses
9 killed 27 wounded [5] 4 wounded [6] [3]	U.S claim: [7] [8] [9] [10] 21–65 killed 45 wounded (Only 2 bodies were found)
class=notpageimage| Location within Afghanistan

The Battle of Wanat took place on July 13, 2008, when around 200 Taliban insurgents attacked American troops stationed near Quam, in the Waygal district of Afghanistan's far eastern Nuristan province. ^[11] The distant position was primarily defended by United States Army soldiers with 2nd Platoon, Chosen Company, 2nd Battalion, 503rd Infantry Regiment (Airborne), 173rd Airborne Brigade Combat Team.

The Taliban encircled the remote base and its observation post, attacking it from Quam and surrounding farmland. They destroyed much of the U.S. troops' heavy munitions, broke through their lines, and entered the main base before being finally repelled by artillery and aircraft. The United States claimed to have killed at least 21 Taliban fighters for nine of its own soldiers killed and 27 wounded, together with four Afghan National Army (ANA) soldiers wounded. ^[12]

One of several attacks on remote outposts, the Battle of Wanat has been described as among the bloodiest Taliban attacks of the war. ^[13] In contrast to previous assaults, from roadside bombings to haphazard ambushes, this attack was well-coordinated; fighters across different insurgent groups were able to precisely target key equipment, such as a wire-guided missile launcher, through a sustained and disciplined effort.

The battle became the focus of debate in the United States, generating "... a great deal of interest and scrutiny among military professionals and outside observers ..." mainly due to the relatively "... significant number of coalition casualties ..." ^[14] Several investigations were launched into events leading up to the battle. The initial investigation was completed in August 2008. In July 2009, Senator James Webb requested that the U.S. Army formally investigate the battle and previous investigation. Lieutenant General Richard F. Natonski conducted another investigation in late 2009 which led to orders of reprimand for the chain of command. In June 2010, the U.S. Army revoked the reprimands. They stated that no negligence was involved and said of the soldiers that "... by their valor and their skill, they successfully defended their positions and defeated a determined, skillful, and adaptable enemy."

Background

Waygal District in the Nuristan Province in Afghanistan

In 2008, NATO forces in southeastern Afghanistan deployed sub-company-sized patrols to the Pakistan border to disrupt supplies flowing to the Taliban from the Federally Administered Tribal Areas of Pakistan. ^[4] They established small patrol bases, which came under regular attack by Taliban forces. ^[15]

Rock Move OPLAN July 8–9, 2008. The result of the move was the establishment of a Coalition outpost at Wanat

Proposal for COP at Wanat

In June, a small contingent of 72 troops, 48 American and 24 Afghan, were operating in and around Wanat, a mountain Quam^{[ clarification needed ]} that was the center of the Waygal District government and about 5 miles (8.0 km) from the coalition military base Camp Blessing. ^{[8] [9] [16]} On July 4, a U.S. Army helicopter attacked vehicles they claimed were firing on them and killed 17 people. Both sides reported Forward Observation Base (FOB) Bella was under attack by indirect fire. Intelligence reports said that the FOB was going to be overrun from within the base as well. The helicopter attack was in response to the indirect fire received from a mortar tube that was being fired from the bed of a Toyota Hilux pick-up. The initial Taliban radio transmissions that were intercepted reported that the "... big gun [mortar tube] had been hit ..." and the Taliban commander had been killed. A few hours after the helicopter attacked, with the Chosen Company commander and the troops in contact confirming the targets, the Taliban radio reports changed to "... they killed the shop keeper [that had the same name as the Taliban commander], the big gun was not damaged."^{[ citation needed ]}

Five days before the battle, on July 8, a platoon from the Second Battalion, 503rd Infantry Regiment, 173rd Airborne Brigade Combat Team established Vehicle Patrol Base (VPB) Kahler and a separate observation post called OP Top Side near Wanat. 2nd Platoon, Chosen Company, departed from Camp Blessing after sunset in a ground assault convoy for the 90-minute-long drive to Wanat. The convoy contained five M1114 armored Humvees. There was one for each of the three rifle squads, a vehicle for platoon headquarters, and the last vehicle containing the TOW missile squad. The Humvees mounted heavy weapons, two with 50-cal machine guns, and two with MK-19 40mm automatic grenade launchers in protected cupolas to provide extra firepower and protection. ^[14] Their goal was to create a Combat Outpost (COP) to connect with and provide security for the local populace, coordinate $1.4 million in reconstruction projects, and disrupt Taliban activity. ^[17] The brigade was to be relieved by a newly arriving U.S. Army unit in two weeks. ^[18]

The patrol base was situated in an open field about 300 meters long by 100 meters wide surrounded on two sides by buildings which composed the Quam. On July 9, a six-man engineer squad arrived by Chinook helicopter. They brought a Bobcat loader and a shipping container with engineering equipment. The soldiers reinforced the base with existing terrain, sandbags, barbed wire, and used the Bobcat to fill a number of HESCO barriers (essentially wall-sized sandbags) around the three squad positions and to create a firing pit for the big 120-mm mortar. ^[14] However, the Bobcat broke down for one day, and could not lift high enough to place barriers to a 7-foot (2.1 m) height. The barriers were placed at just a 4-foot (1.2 m) level, which would make it vulnerable to direct fire from guns or rockets which the attackers would exploit. The troops dug many of the fortifications and trenches with hand shovels. ^[19] Still in preparation at the time of the attack, some areas were only protected by a barrier of concertina wire, but with no posts or stakes; the wire was simply stretched out on the ground. ^[3]

The Afghan company contracted to bring heavy construction equipment delayed its arrival until July 13. It was decided that soldier labor –with the aid of an engineer squad and a Bobcat front-end loader already at Bella –would be good enough to prepare an initial defense in the six days until heavier equipment arrived. The number of men at the base was judged adequate to defend against intelligence estimates that placed the insurgent forces in the local area at about 150 experienced fighters, though they did not know that attackers would be backed up by other guerrilla groups from neighboring regions as far away as Pakistan and Kashmir. While they thought it was possible the base might be attacked while the camp was being prepared, they thought it unlikely. Platoon Sergeant Dzwik later remarked "I was expecting harassing fire from any one of the high ground in every direction. I did not think the village itself would let the AAF [Anti-Afghan Force] turn their village into a battle zone. ^[20]

Soldiers at the base noticed warning signs, including groups of men watching the construction from the nearby village, which was set at a higher elevation than the outpost, and other groups of men moving through nearby mountains. At a dinner meeting in the village, a villager told the Americans that they should shoot any men seen in the mountains, and asked them if U.S. UAVs were keeping watch nearby. ^{[3] [21]} The day before the attack, militants began flowing water through an irrigation ditch feeding an unused field, creating background noise that masked the sounds of the advancing fighters.

Although the Americans believed that 100 or 200 attacked the base, a senior Afghan defense ministry official who did not reveal his name told Al Jazeera that he had information it was between 400 and 500 fighters. Tamim Nuristani, former governor of Nuristan, believed that numerous Taliban and Pakistani militant and terrorist groups banded together from surrounding regions including Kunar and the Bajaur tribal agency in neighboring Pakistan. According to U.S. intelligence, groups operating in the region included Taliban, al-Qaeda, Kashmir-based Lashkar-e-Taiba and Pakistan-based (as of 2013 still located in one of many strongholds in the Bajaur agency of FATA (Federally Administered Tribal Areas in Kunar and Nuristan of Afghanistan)) Hezb-i-Islami. According to the Long War Journal, Al Qaeda's senior leadership including Ayman al Zawahiri and Osama bin Laden were thought to shelter in the region (Bin Laden was actually in Pakistan at the time). ^[4] A NATO spokesman believed that the Taliban had moved into and expelled a nearby Khel (small village-tribe subdivision) for the attack. On the evening of July 12, Taliban soldiers moved into Wanat and ordered the villagers to leave. Undetected by ISAF and the ANA, they set up firing positions inside Kors and a mosque next to and overlooking the perimeter. ^[3]

Battle

A U.S. Army video recreation of the battle.

About 4:20 a.m. on July 13, Taliban forces opened fire on the base with machine guns, rocket-propelled grenades (RPGs), and mortars. Another 100 militants attacked the observation post from farmland to the east. ^[8]

The initial attack hit the forward operating base's mortar pit, knocking out the 120 mm mortar and detonating the stockpile of mortar ammunition. The insurgents next destroyed the Humvee-mounted TOW missile launcher inside the combat outpost with coordinated fire from unguided RPG rockets. In short order, the base's two heaviest weapons were knocked out, with the subsequent mortar explosion hurling anti-tank missiles into the command base's post. ^[22]

From the U.S. perspective, the most serious situation was the attack concentrated on a small team situated at the small observation post known as "TOPSIDE," nestled among rocks under a tree 50m to 70m outside the main base. The first round hit accurately, wounding or stunning every soldier present. Pfc. Tyler Stafford was blown out of his machine-gun position next to Spc. Matthew Phillips and others, who continued to throw grenades at attackers before Phillips was mortally wounded. Cpl. Jason Bogar, fired hundreds of rounds from his automatic weapon until it jammed, before attending to Stafford's wounds. After a rocket-propelled grenade wounded Sgt. Ryan M. Pitts, Bogar applied a tourniquet to his leg, before manning two other machine guns. Bogar then jumped from the outpost bunker to get close enough to kill insurgents who were firing down upon the men from the village hotel. Once outside the bunker, Bogar was shot through the chest and killed. The surviving soldiers then ran from the outpost to the main post, leaving Pitts behind. Alone, Pitts was able to hold-off the Taliban from overrunning the position until their comrades returned two hours later and they were evacuated to receive medical care. ^[23]

Four U.S. soldiers were killed within the first 20 minutes of the battle — another died later — and at least three others were wounded. Three times, teams of soldiers from the main base ran through Taliban fire to resupply the observation post and carry back the dead and wounded. ^{[3] [9] [24] [25]}

The U.S. troops responded with machine guns, grenades, and claymore mines. Artillery guns at Camp Blessing fired 96 155 mm artillery rounds. The Taliban briefly breached the wire of the observation post before being driven back. After almost half an hour of intense fighting at the observation post, only one soldier — Pitts — remained. He was seriously wounded and fought alone until reinforcements arrived. Some militants also managed to get past the main base's eastern barriers.^{[ citation needed ]} Two U.S. soldiers, platoon leader First Lieutenant Jonathan P. Brostrom, 24, of Hawaii and Corporal Jason Hovater, were killed trying to deliver ammunition to the observation post. ^[26] U.S. soldiers were at times flushed out of their fortifications by what they thought were grenades, but which were actually rocks thrown by the attackers. ^{[3] [9]} Brostrom, Hovater, and another soldier may have been killed by an insurgent who penetrated the wire perimeter. ^[22]

AH-64 Apache attack helicopters and a Predator unmanned aircraft drone armed with Hellfire missiles arrived over the base about 30 minutes after the battle began. During the battle, U.S. soldiers were resupplied by UH-60 Blackhawk helicopter with fire support from the AH-64 Apaches. Wounded troops were evacuated to nearby Camp Wright, where members of E Troop, 2/17th Cavalry, 101st Airborne Division would wait to rearm and refuel the UH-60s and AH-64s. ^[16] Later, a B-1B Lancer bomber, A-10, and F-15E Strike Eagle aircraft were called in. The militants withdrew about four hours later. ^[3] After the militants retreated, mop up operations followed, and the Taliban withdrew from the town. ^{[8] [27]}

Nine U.S. soldiers were killed in the attack, ^[28] mainly in the observation post. ^{[28] [29]} Between 21 and 65 militants were reported killed with another 20 to 40 wounded, but coalition forces found only two Taliban bodies after the battle. ^{[8] [9]} The attack was the highest death toll for U.S. troops in the country since Operation Red Wings three years earlier. ^[30]

Operational issues

Combat Outpost Kahler – July 13, 2008. Observation post is to the upper right of the main camp with buildings and mosque at and overlooking the edge of the northern perimeter

Civilian deaths caused by allied operations had increased sympathy among Waygal residents for the Taliban, who were allowed to move into the Quam. The residents may have been further dismayed by the failure of the Afghan president, Hamid Karzai, to address the concerns of a delegation of elders and maliks in Kabul two days previously. ^[31]

Coalition troops had noticed other warning signs. The day before the attack, the "Spin Giris" (Pashto for "White Beards" – influential tribal elders) of Wanat conducted a Jirga, an elder community council (experienced male members of the Quam have a right to attend), without the post's Officer-in-Charge. Additionally, the villagers began pouring waste water into an area of dead space near the post more frequently which may have concealed the movement of militants within the village. ^[3]

A 2009 U.S. Army report criticized the brigade commander, Colonel Chip Preysler, and the battalion commander, Lieutenant Colonel William Ostlund, citing the lack of supplies, equipment, and drinking water for troops stationed in Wanat. At the same time, the report praised the performance of its soldiers under fire. ^[32]

The same report criticized the actions of the involved commanding officers as being counterproductive to military goals, stating that "The highly kinetic approach favored by TF Rock ... rapidly and inevitably degraded the relationships between the U.S. Army and the Waigal population." ^[32]

This statement, portraying the operational approaches of the 173rd Airborne Brigade (TF Bayonet) and 2-503 PIR (TF Rock) in a negative light, is contradicted by David Kilcullen in his book, The Accidental Guerrilla. Kilcullen stated that in March 2008,

The fact that Kunar has bucked the general trend [downward trend in security across the country] seems largely to be the result of a consistent U.S. strategy of partnering with local communities to separate the insurgents from the people, bring tangible benefits of governance and development to the population, and help the population choose their own local Khan's (Protectors, usually military), through elections. ^[33]

Kilcullen also noted a statement by a previous U.S. commander in Kunar regarding LTC William Ostlund, the 2-503 commander: "Bill O. understood deeply that the effect of Coalition operations on the people was the key question." ^[34]

Aftermath

U.S. withdrawal

After the battle, Major General Jeffrey J. Schloesser, U.S. Army commander of coalition troops in Regional Command East, Afghanistan, decided to abandon the patrol base and sent additional U.S. troops to assist the base evacuation. ^[35] Three days after the engagement the United States and Afghan armies withdrew from Wanat. An ISAF statement said ISAF and Afghan security forces "... will continue to perform regular patrols near the village of Wanat." ^[36] The coalition forces continued to maintain a larger patrol base about four miles away from Wanat and concentrated on protecting the larger Pech River Valley. ^{[3] [37]}

The district police force for the area was disarmed by the Americans and the district chief and police chief were briefly detained and questioned. ^[38] Both were released within 24 hours, according to a spokesperson for the district chief. ^[3]

Speaking at a Pentagon news conference after the attack, U.S. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Navy Admiral Mike Mullen said the incident indicated that "... all involved with operations on the (Pakistan-Afghanistan, especially the porous Kunar, Kashmir, and Nuristan), border must do a better job of policing the region and eliminating the extremists' safe havens in Pakistan's federally administered tribal areas that are launching pads for attacks on coalition forces." ^[39] The Associated Press reported that the attack underscored a general gain in strength of Afghan insurgents. ^[40]

However, the 173rd Brigade Commander, Colonel Charles "Chip" Preysler, specifically rebutted that conclusion in an interview on July 20, 2008. He stated that previous media accounts of the engagement mischaracterized the level of development of the platoon's defences. He also said that the withdrawal of the platoon did not constitute "abandoning" the position because no permanent defensive infrastructure was developed or left behind. He further stated that the position was "... not overrun in any shape, manner, or form ...", adding that, "It was close combat to be sure – hand grenade range." ^[41]

U.S. Army investigation

View of Wanat COP looking east from mortar position with 2nd Squad position, the bazaar and OP Topside's later location in the background, July 9, 2008.

An investigation by the U.S. Army, completed on August 13 and released to the public the first week of November 2008, found that the Taliban fighters had been assisted by the Afghan local police (ALP), forces and a district leader. The evidence included large stocks of weapons and ammunition discovered in the police barracks in Wanat after the battle. The stocks were much more than could be used by the villages' 20-man police force and included dirty weapons which appeared to have been used recently. In response to the report, Schloesser concluded that the governor and local police chief "... had probably been acting under duress and had been cooperative with American troops." The governor was absolved of blame in the attack but it was unclear about what was done with the local police chief. ^[3]

The investigation also examined whether the Army had intelligence about a possible assault and whether the troops had access to it. ^[42] The report found that –despite reports earlier in July that 200 to 300 insurgents had been massing to attack another remote outpost in the vicinity, including numerous reports from local villagers that an attack was imminent, the commanders at Wanat had no reason to expect such a large frontal assault. The report, however, criticized the "... incredible amount of time ..." – 10 months – it took NATO military leaders to negotiate arrangements over the site of the outpost, giving the Taliban plenty of time to coordinate and plan an attack on the base. ^[3]

Further actions

In July 2009, U.S. Senator James Webb asked the U.S. DoD Inspector General to formally examine the battle and the U.S. Army's investigation into the event. In his request, Webb cited an unreleased report from the Army's Combat Studies Institute by a contractor, Douglas Cubbison, that criticized how senior Army leaders in Afghanistan, especially Ostlund and Preysler, acted before the assault at Wanat. According to that report, soldiers at the Wanat base were critically short of basic necessities such as water and sandbags and had complained repeatedly, to no avail, that their base was in a precarious position. ^{[22] [43] [44]} Cubbison had written the report at the request of Lieutenant General William B. Caldwell IV, commander of the United States Army Combined Arms Center. ^[35] Cubbison wrote that a few days before the battle, on July 4, a U.S. Army helicopter mistakenly attacked and killed 17 civilians, including all of the doctors and nurses at a local clinic, infuriating local Afghans. ^[45] Platoon leader Brostrom and company commander Captain Matthew Myer told their commanders that they expected a retaliatory attack and asked for extra surveillance. Brostrom's father, retired Army Colonel David. P. Brostrom, alerted Webb's office to the Army historian's report and became a vocal critic of the chain of command. Said Brostrom, "After I read the report, I was sick to my stomach." ^{[21] [43]}

Letters of reprimand were issued to Colonel Charles Preysler, Lieutenant Colonel William Ostlund and Captain Myer for "... failing to properly prepare defenses ..." at Wanat, Pentagon officials said March 12. ^[46] That same month, Myer was awarded the Silver Star for his actions during the battle of Wanat. ^[46]

On September 30, 2009, U.S. Central Command commander General David H. Petraeus appointed U.S. Marine Corps Lieutenant General Richard F. Natonski to lead a new inquiry into the battle and which would look into related issues "... beyond the tactical level ..." ^{[22] [47] [48]} A later review was conducted by General Charles C. Campbell which "... focused on the totality of circumstances that included and affected actions at Wanat," including interviews of the officers involved, and reviews of previous investigations with the exception of the Fort Leavenworth Combat Studies Institute (CSI) narrative –stating that it had "... not undergone pre-publication vetting and academic review in accordance with standing CSI research protocols." ^{[49] [50]} Campbell concluded that the officers involved were not at fault:

[The officers] were neither negligent nor derelict in the performance of their duties, exercising a degree of care that a reasonably prudent person would have exercised under the same or similar circumstance. To criminalize command decisions in a theater of complex combat operations is a grave step indeed. It is also unnecessary, particularly in this case. It is possible for officers to err in judgment –and to thereby incur censure –without violating a criminal statute. This is particularly true where the errors are those of omission, where the standards come from multiple non-punitive doctrinal publications, where there is less than complete and certain knowledge of enemy capabilities and intent, and where commanders enjoy wide discretion in their exercise of their command prerogatives and responsibilities. ^[50]

In June 2010, General Campbell revoked the officers' reprimands, citing that they would have a "chilling effect" on ground operations. The Army said that the second look at the incident proved that the officers were "... neither negligent nor derelict ..." and "... by their valor and their skill, they successfully defended their positions and defeated a determined, skillful, and adaptable enemy who masses and attacks at times, ways and places of his choosing." ^[51] Secretary of the Army John McHugh was also humbled by their courage, stating "We remain grateful for and humbled by their extraordinary courage and valor." Gen. George W. Casey Jr., Army chief of staff further commended the performance of the soldiers:

In every review and study conducted to date, the courage, valor, and discipline of the soldiers who fought at Wanat have been universally praised. These soldiers were well-trained, well-led, and fought bravely to defeat a determined and intense enemy action to overrun their base in Wanat. They persevered in a fashion that deserves broad recognition of their bravery and tenacity. Our hearts go out to the families of the fallen soldiers.

Upset over Campbell's decision, family members of those killed in action wrote a letter to the Secretary of the Army asking that the findings of Natonski's investigation be upheld and the reprimands reinstated. In addition to the family members, the letter was signed by Senators Daniel Akaka, Jim Webb, Saxby Chambliss, Patty Murray, and Claire McCaskill. ^[52]

In November 2010, the U.S. Army's Combat Studies Institute published a historical account of the Battle of Wanat. ^[14] The official U.S. Army history of the battle, published in December 2010, places little blame on the senior officers involved, instead blaming the uncertain nature of war, mistakes by junior officers, lack of knowledge by Army officers on the Wanat region's complex political situation, and lack of intelligence that the attack forces would be drawn from the entire region, not just the local area. ^[53]

Decorations

Medal of Honor

Ryan M. Pitts was awarded the Medal of Honor on July 21, 2014, for actions on July 13, 2008, during the battle. ^[54] As part of the 173rd Airborne Brigade, Sergeant Pitts served as a Forward Observer. Along with Salvatore Giunta and Kyle J. White, Pitts is the third recipient of the Medal of Honor from 2nd Battalion, 503rd Infantry Regiment. Pitts was medically discharged in 2009. ^{[55] [54]}

See also

• Restrepo , a film made by reporters embedded into a similar observation post in the Korengal Valley. The Battle of Wanat is mentioned in the film when Battle Company hears the news of their sister company's losses.
• Battle of Nam Dong, a 1964 battle in the Vietnam War where communist forces failed to overrun a special forces camp. The battle was dramatized in the 1968 film The Green Berets .
• Battle for Hill 3234, a 1988 battle in the Soviet–Afghan War where Soviet paratroopers repelled Afghan insurgent forces. The battle was dramatized in the 2005 film The 9th Company .
• Battle of Kamdesh, a 2009 battle 20 miles from Wanat, the bloodiest battle for U.S. forces since the Battle of Wanat. An assault by 300 Taliban fighters resulted in eight Americans killed and 22 wounded, and prompt withdrawal from nearly destroyed base. The battle was dramatized in the 2019 film The Outpost .

References

1. "Taliban claim killing 20 US troops in Kunar". Pak Tribune . July 14, 2008. Archived from the original on July 27, 2008. Retrieved July 16, 2008.
2. Wanat Combat Action in Afghanistan 2008 page 19
3. Schmitt, Eric (November 3, 2008). "Afghan Officials Aided an Attack on U.S. Soldiers". The New York Times. p. 1. Archived from the original on January 3, 2018. Retrieved October 12, 2009.
4. "Joint al Qaeda and Taliban force behind Nuristan base attack". Long War Journal. July 14, 2008. Archived from the original on August 3, 2008. Retrieved July 18, 2008.
5. Martinez, Luis (July 15, 2008). "Taliban Flexing Muscle in Afghanistan". ABC News. Archived from the original on February 7, 2009. Retrieved October 12, 2009.
6. "Taliban fighters storm US base". Al Jazeera. Archived from the original on July 16, 2008. Retrieved July 16, 2008.
7. "Police, Locals Implicated In Attack". The Washington Post. Associated Press. November 5, 2008. p. 14. Archived from the original on November 10, 2012. Retrieved October 12, 2009.
8. Gall, Carlotta & Eric Schmitt (July 15, 2008). "Taliban Breached NATO Base In Deadly Clash". The New York Times . p. 6. Archived from the original on February 14, 2018. Retrieved October 12, 2009.
9. Harris, Kent & Joseph Giordono (November 9, 2008). "Report details attack on GIs in Afghanistan". Stars and Stripes. Archived from the original on February 5, 2009. Retrieved October 12, 2009.
10. Wanat Combat Action in Afghanistan, 2008, p. 97
11. Wanat Combat Action in Afghanistan 2008.
12. U.S. Army Combat Studies Institute (2010). "Wanat: Combat Action in Afghanistan, 2008" (PDF). U.S. Army Combined Arms Center. Combined Studies Institute Press. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 2, 2010. Retrieved November 20, 2010.; http://militarytimes.com/news/2009/09/army_wanat_investigation_093009/ Archived June 2, 2012, at the Wayback Machine
13. Tavernise, Sabrina; SANGAR RAHIMI (October 4, 2009). "Attacks on Remote Posts Highlight Afghan Risks". The New York Times. Archived from the original on January 3, 2018. Retrieved October 4, 2009.
14. Staff of the US Army Combat Studies Institute (2010). "Wanat: Combat Action in Afghanistan, 2008" (PDF). US Army Combined Arms Center. Combined Studies Institute Press. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 2, 2010. Retrieved November 20, 2010.
15. Martinez, Luis (July 14, 2008). "Even 500 Lbs Bombs Couldn't Stop Taliban". ABC News. Archived from the original on July 15, 2008. Retrieved July 16, 2008.
16. Wiltrout, Kate (July 19, 2008). "Soldier From Eastern Shore Recounts Deadly Battle In Afghanistan". Virginian-Pilot .
17. Jaffe, Greg (October 4, 2009). "Almost A Lost Cause". The Washington Post . p. 1.
18. Jaffe, Greg (October 5, 2009). "Not 'Just Another Casualty'". The Washington Post. p. 1.
19. "Study gives new details on deadly Wanat battle". Army Times. Retrieved March 10, 2011.
20. Staff of the US Army Combat Studies Institute (2010). "Wanat: Combat Action in Afghanistan, 2008" (PDF). US Army Combined Arms Center. Combined Studies Institute Press. p. 77. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 2, 2010. Retrieved November 20, 2010.
21. Bernton, Hal & Cheryl Phillips (July 31, 2009). "Army's Missteps Set Stage For Tragedy, Study Finds" ((Link in Military Times )). Seattle Times : 1. Archived from the original on July 31, 2012. Retrieved August 3, 2009.
22. Shanker, Thom (October 3, 2009). "U.S. Review Of Battle Disaster Sways Strategy On Afghanistan". The New York Times. p. 1.
23. Carroll, Chris, "Soldier in storied Battle of Wanat to be given Medal of Honor Archived June 25, 2014, at the Wayback Machine ", Stars and Stripes , June 23, 2014.
24. "Soldiers recount deadly attack on Afghanistan outpost". Stars and Stripes. July 19, 2008. Archived from the original on September 10, 2009. Retrieved October 12, 2009.
25. Harris, Kent (July 5, 2009). "NCO receives Silver Star for valor in '08 battle at Wanat". Military Times . Archived from the original on September 19, 2012. Retrieved October 12, 2009.
26. Blitzer, Wolf & Barbara Starr (August 19, 2008). "Soldier Discusses Deadly July 13 Attack By Taliban Forces". The Situation Room . CNN.
27. Wood, David (July 28, 2008). "Afghan air war grows in intensity". The Baltimore Sun . p. 1. Retrieved October 12, 2009.^{[ permanent dead link ]}
28. "DoD Identifies Army Casualties ..." Department of Defense. Archived from the original on July 26, 2008. Retrieved July 18, 2008.
29. "Hawaii soldier killed in Afghanistan ..." Star Bulletin. Archived from the original on July 20, 2008. Retrieved July 17, 2008.
30. "'Heroic' fighting repels Afghan militants". CNN. July 14, 2008. Archived from the original on July 17, 2008. Retrieved July 16, 2008.
31. "Dawn Raid". The Economist. July 17, 2008. Archived from the original on July 30, 2008. Retrieved July 31, 2008.
32. "Army Report Finds A Major COIN Failure". Foreign Policy. Slate Group. October 11, 2009. Archived from the original on July 26, 2009. Retrieved October 12, 2009.
33. Kilcullin, David (2009). The Accidental Guerilla. New York: Oxford University Press. pp.  70–71. ISBN   978-0-19-536834-5.
34. Kilcullin, David (2009). The Accidental Guerilla. New York: Oxford University Press. pp.  93–94. ISBN   978-0-19-536834-5. Statement by "LTC Colonel Chris Cavoli, battalion commander of 1–32 Infantry in the Kunar valley in 2005–2006." The italics in the quotes are from the source.
35. "Remote Afghan Outpost Reinforced After Attack That Killed 9 U.S. Troops". Associated Press. July 15, 2008.
36. International Security Assistance Force (July 16, 2008). "ISAF presence will be maintained in Wanat, PR# 2008-320, 2008-07-16". Archived from the original on August 1, 2008. Retrieved July 19, 2008.
37. Jaffe, Greg (October 6, 2009). "They Feel Like Outsiders And They Don't Want To Be". The Washington Post. p. 1.
38. "19 insurgents killed in Afghanistan". The Boston Globe. Associated Press. July 15, 2008. Archived from the original on February 6, 2009. Retrieved July 18, 2008.
39. "Pakistan Must Do More to Police Tribal Zone, Defense Leaders Say". American Forces Press Service. July 16, 2008. Archived from the original on July 22, 2008. Retrieved July 19, 2008.
40. NBC News. "U.S. troops quit remote Afghan base after attack". NBC News . Archived from the original on November 2, 2013. Retrieved July 16, 2008.
41. "Commander: Media reports on Afghanistan battle were exaggerated". Stars and Stripes. July 20, 2008. Archived from the original on October 16, 2009. Retrieved October 12, 2009. Colonel Preysler was a battalion commander during Operation Anaconda in March of 2002
42. Starr, Barbara; Jamie McIntyre (July 17, 2008). "Military looking at intelligence before deadly Afghan clash". CNN. Archived from the original on February 5, 2009. Retrieved October 12, 2009.
43. Jaffe, Greg (July 24, 2009). "Army Brass Conduct Before Afghan Attack Is Questioned". The Washington Post. p. 13.
44. O'Connor, Phillip (October 2, 2009). "Soldier's Dad Gets Wish For Inquiry". St. Louis Post-Dispatch .
45. "Afghan official: U.S. strike killed 17 civilians". CNN. July 5, 2005. Archived from the original on May 24, 2018. Retrieved May 24, 2018.
46. Luis Martinez (March 12, 2010). "Silver Star Winner Reprimanded for Afghan Battle". ABC News. Archived from the original on April 25, 2010. Retrieved June 6, 2010.
47. "New Review Ordered Of Fatal Clash In Afghanistan". The New York Times: 12. October 1, 2009.
48. Shanker, Thom (October 2, 2009). "Pentagon To Re-Examine 2008 Afghan Clash". The New York Times: 12.
49. U.S. Army (June 23, 2010). "Wanat Review" (News). Archived from the original on December 2, 2010. Retrieved September 6, 2013.
50. Campbell, Charles C. (May 13, 2010). "Army Action on the Re-Investigation into the Combat Action at Wanat Village, Wygal District, Nuristan Province, Afghanistan on 13 July 2008" (PDF) (Redacted Report). (Memorandum for the Honorable John M. McHugh, Secretary of the Army). Headquarters, U.S. Army Forces Command. pp. 2–3. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 16, 2011. Retrieved September 6, 2013.
51. Lardner, Richard (June 23, 2010). "Officers won't be punished over Afghan war". NBC News. Associated Press. Archived from the original on May 6, 2021. Retrieved September 6, 2013.
52. Cole, William, "Senators Want Explanation For Army's Reversal On Wanat", Honolulu Advertiser , July 23, 2010.
53. Greg Jaffe (December 29, 2010). "Army edits its history of the deadly battle of Wanat". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on April 24, 2011. Retrieved December 31, 2010.
54. "President Obama to Award the Medal of Honor". whitehouse.gov (Press release). June 23, 2014. Retrieved June 24, 2014– via National Archives.
55. "Army staff sergeant will receive Medal of Honor for valor at Wanat | Army Times". armytimes.com. June 23, 2014. Retrieved June 24, 2014.

Further reading

• Combat Studies Institute (U.S.) and U.S. Army Combined Arms Center. Wanat: Combat Action in Afghanistan, 2008. Fort Leavenworth, KS: Combat Studies Institute Press, United States Army Combined Arms Center, 2010. ISBN   098419018X, OCLC   793852339
• Inspector General, Dept. of Defense. Reinvestigation of Combat Action at Wanat Village, Afghanistan. Arlington, Va: Inspector General, Dept. of Defense, 2010. OCLC   785896348
• Johnson, Robert (2011): Outnumbered, Outgunned, Undeterred: Twenty Battles Against All Odds. New York: Thames & Hudson, ISBN   0500251878, OCLC   756058735
• Steeb, Randall (2011): Perspectives on the Battle of Wanat: Challenges Facing Small Unit Operations in Afghanistan. Santa Monica, CA: Rand. ISBN   0833053221, OCLC   755905563

External links

• "Chosen Few: A True life Documentary film series based on The Battle of Wanat". www.TheBattleofWanat.com. April 2012.
• Mark Bowden (December 2011). "Echoes from a Distant Battlefield". Vanity Fair. Retrieved November 28, 2011.
• Staff of the US Army Combat Studies Institute (2010). "Wanat: Combat Action in Afghanistan, 2008" (PDF). US Army Combined Arms Center. Combined Studies Institute Press. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 2, 2010. Retrieved November 20, 2010.
• Rondeaux, Candace (July 14, 2008). "Nine U.S. Soldiers Killed in Firefight". The Washington Post. Retrieved July 17, 2008.
• United States Army (June 23, 2010). "Wanat Review". Archived from the original on December 2, 2010. Retrieved July 1, 2010.
• United States Army (May 13, 2010). "GEN Campbell Wanat Report Redacted" (PDF). Retrieved July 1, 2010.
• "AR 15-6 Investigation Findings and Recommendations – Vehicle Patrol Base (VPB) Wanat Complex Attack and Casualties, 13 July 2008" (PDF). United States Army. August 13, 2008. Retrieved March 25, 2010. (Part 1)
• "AR 15-6 Investigation Findings and Recommendations – Vehicle Patrol Base (VPB) Wanat Complex Attack and Casualties, 13 July 2008" (PDF). United States Army. August 13, 2008. Retrieved March 25, 2010. (Part 2)
• Zhang, Yunlong (July 14, 2008). "Nine NATO-led soldiers die in intensified Afghan battles". Xinhua. Archived from the original on August 1, 2008. Retrieved July 17, 2008.