Bourgeois revolution

Last updated

Bourgeois revolution is a term used in Marxist theory to refer to a social revolution that aims to destroy a feudal system or its vestiges, establish the rule of the bourgeoisie, and create a capitalist state. [1] [2] In colonised or subjugated countries, bourgeois revolutions often take the form of a war of national independence. The Dutch, English, American, and French revolutions are considered the archetypal bourgeois revolutions, [3] [4] in that they attempted to clear away the remnants of the medieval feudal system, so as to pave the way for the rise of capitalism. [1] The term is usually used in contrast to "proletarian revolution", and is also sometimes called a "bourgeois-democratic revolution". [5] [6]

Contents

Theories of bourgeois revolution

Starting in the late 18th century, the Bildungsburger
("educated bourgeoise") class defined itself more on the basis of education than material possessions and thus great emphasis was laid upon the education of children. Burgerkinder zur Biedermeierzeit (um 1820).jpg
Starting in the late 18th century, the Bildungsbürger ("educated bourgeoise") class defined itself more on the basis of education than material possessions and thus great emphasis was laid upon the education of children.

According to one version of the two-stage theory, bourgeois revolution was asserted to be a necessary step in the move toward socialism, as codified by Georgi Plekhanov. [7] [8] In this view, countries like the Russian Empire that had preserved their feudal structure would have to establish capitalism via a bourgeois revolution before being able to wage a proletarian revolution. [9] [10] At the time of the Russian Revolution, the Mensheviks asserted this theory, arguing that a revolution led by the bourgeoisie was necessary to modernise society, establish basic freedoms, and overcome feudalism, which would establish the conditions necessary for socialism. [9] This view is prominent in Marxist–Leninist analysis. [11] [12]

Political sociologist Barrington Moore Jr. identified the bourgeois revolution as one of three routes from pre-industrial society to the modern world, in which a capitalist mode of production is combined with liberal democracy. Moore identified the English, French, and American revolutions as examples of this route. [13]

Historian Neil Davidson believes that neither the establishment of democracy or the end of feudal relations are defining characteristics of bourgeois revolutions but instead supports Alex Callinicos' definition of bourgeois revolution as being those that establish "an independent center of capital accumulation". [6] [14] [15] Charles Post labels this analysis as consequentialism, where there is no requirement of the prior development of capitalism or bourgeois class agency for bourgeois revolutions, and that they are only defined by the effects of the revolutions to promote the development of capital accumulation. [16]

Other theories describe the evolution of the bourgeoisie as not needing a revolution. [17] The German bourgeoisie during the 1848 revolution did not strive to take command of the political effort and instead sided with the crown. [18] [19] Davidson attributes their behaviour to the late development of capitalist relations and uses this as the model for the evolution of the bourgeoisie. [20]

Left communists often view the revolutions leading to Communist states in the 20th century as "bourgeois revolutions". [21] [22]

Goals of the bourgeois revolution

According to the Marxist view, the tasks of the bourgeois revolution include:

Bourgeois revolutions in history

Bourgeois revolutions in the Middle Ages

Although with much less diffusion, some social movements of the European Late Middle Ages received the name of bourgeois revolution, in which the bourgeoisie begins to define itself in the nascent cities as a social class. Examples include the Ciompi Revolt in the Republic of Florence, Jacquerie revolts during the Hundred Years' War in France, [33] and Bourgeois revolts of Sahagún  [ es ] in Spain. [34] [35]

Bourgeois revolutions in the early modern period

The first wave of bourgeois revolutions are those that occurred within the early modern period and were typically marked by being driven from below by the petty bourgeoisie against absolutist governments. [6]

A Loyalist customs official tarred and feathered by the Sons of Liberty during the American Revolutionary War Philip Dawe (attributed), The Bostonians Paying the Excise-man, or Tarring and Feathering (1774) - 02.jpg
A Loyalist customs official tarred and feathered by the Sons of Liberty during the American Revolutionary War

Bourgeois revolutions in the late modern period

1911 battle at Ta-ping gate, Nanking, during the Chinese Revolution in a painting by T. Miyano An episode in the revolutionary war in China, 1911 - the battle at the Ta-ping gate at Nanking. Wellcome L0040002.jpg
1911 battle at Ta-ping gate, Nanking, during the Chinese Revolution in a painting by T. Miyano

The second wave of bourgeois revolutions are those that occurred within the late modern period and were typically marked by being led from above by the haute bourgeoisie. [6]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Karl Marx</span> German-born philosopher (1818–1883)

Karl Marx was a German-born philosopher, political theorist, economist, historian, sociologist, journalist, and revolutionary socialist. His best-known works are the 1848 pamphlet The Communist Manifesto and his three-volume Das Kapital (1867–1894); the latter employs his critical approach of historical materialism in an analysis of capitalism, in the culmination of his intellectual endeavours. Marx's ideas and their subsequent development, collectively known as Marxism, have had enormous influence on modern intellectual, economic and political history.

<i>The Communist Manifesto</i> 1848 political publication by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels

The Communist Manifesto, originally the Manifesto of the Communist Party, is a political pamphlet written by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, commissioned by the Communist League and originally published in London in 1848. The text is the first and most systematic attempt by Marx and Engels to codify for wide consumption the historical materialist idea that "the history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles", in which social classes are defined by the relationship of people to the means of production. Published amid the Revolutions of 1848 in Europe, the Manifesto remains one of the world's most influential political documents.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Friedrich Engels</span> German philosopher (1820–1895)

Friedrich Engels was a German philosopher, political theorist, historian, journalist, and revolutionary socialist. He was also a businessman and Karl Marx's closest friend and collaborator, serving as a leading authority on Marxism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bourgeoisie</span> Social class

The bourgeoisie are a class of business owners and merchants which emerged in the Late Middle Ages, originally as a "middle class" between peasantry and aristocracy. They are traditionally contrasted with the proletariat by their wealth, political power, and education, as well as their access to and control of cultural, social, and financial capital.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">English Revolution</span> Term used by historians to describe various 17th-century episodes in English history

The English Revolution is a term that describes two separate events in English history. Prior to the 20th century, it was generally applied to the 1688 Glorious Revolution, when James II was deposed and a constitutional monarchy established under William III and Mary II.

Marxism is a political philosophy and method of socioeconomic analysis. It uses a dialectical materialist interpretation of historical development, better known as historical materialism, to analyse class relations, social conflict, and social transformation. Marxism originates with the works of 19th-century German philosophers Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Marxism has developed over time into various branches and schools of thought, and as a result, there is no single, definitive Marxist theory. Marxism has had a profound effect in shaping the modern world, with various left-wing and far-left political movements taking inspiration from it in varying local contexts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economic determinism</span> Theory that all societal relationships are based on economic relationships

Economic determinism is a socioeconomic theory that economic relationships are the foundation upon which all other societal and political arrangements in society are based. The theory stresses that societies are divided into competing economic classes whose relative political power is determined by the nature of the economic system.

Marxian class theory asserts that an individual's position within a class hierarchy is determined by their role in the production process, and argues that political and ideological consciousness is determined by class position. A class is those who share common economic interests, are conscious of those interests, and engage in collective action which advances those interests. Within Marxian class theory, the structure of the production process forms the basis of class construction.

Karl Marx's idea that the state can be divided into three subject areas: pre-capitalist states, states in the capitalist era and the state in post-capitalist society. Overlaying this is the fact that his own ideas about the state changed as he grew older, differing in his early pre-communist phase, the young Marx phase which predates the unsuccessful 1848 uprisings in Europe and in his later work.

Classical Marxism is the body of economic, philosophical, and sociological theories expounded by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in their works, as contrasted with orthodox Marxism, Marxism–Leninism, and autonomist Marxism which emerged after their deaths. The core concepts of classical Marxism include alienation, base and superstructure, class consciousness, class struggle, exploitation, historical materialism, ideology, revolution; and the forces, means, modes, and relations of production. Marx's political praxis, including his attempt to organize a professional revolutionary body in the First International, often served as an area of debate for subsequent theorists.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marxist literary criticism</span>

Marxist literary criticism is a theory of literary criticism based on the historical materialism developed by philosopher and economist Karl Marx. Marxist critics argue that even art and literature themselves form social institutions and have specific ideological functions, based on the background and ideology of their authors. The English literary critic and cultural theorist Terry Eagleton defines Marxist criticism this way: "Marxist criticism is not merely a 'sociology of literature', concerned with how novels get published and whether they mention the working class. Its aims to explain the literary work more fully; and this means a sensitive attention to its forms, styles and, meanings. But it also means grasping those forms styles and meanings as the product of a particular history." In Marxist criticism, class struggle and relations of production are the central instruments in analysis.

<i>The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte</i> 1852 essay by Karl Marx on the French coup of 1851

The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Napoleon is an essay written by Karl Marx between December 1851 and March 1852, and originally published in 1852 in Die Revolution, a German monthly magazine published in New York City by Marxist Joseph Weydemeyer. Later English editions, such as the 1869 Hamburg edition with a preface by Marx, were entitled The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. The essay serves as a major historiographic application of Marx's theory of historical materialism.

Revolutionary socialism is a political philosophy, doctrine, and tradition within socialism that stresses the idea that a social revolution is necessary to bring about structural changes in society. More specifically, it is the view that revolution is a necessary precondition for transitioning from a capitalist to a socialist mode of production. Revolution is not necessarily defined as a violent insurrection; it is defined as a seizure of political power by mass movements of the working class so that the state is directly controlled or abolished by the working class as opposed to the capitalist class and its interests.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mahir Çayan</span>

Mahir Çayan was a Turkish communist revolutionary and the leader of People's Liberation Party-Front of Turkey. He was a Marxist–Leninist revolutionary leader. On 30 March 1972, he was killed in an ambush by Turkish Military Forces with nine of the other members of THKP-C and THKO in Kızıldere village.

In Marxist philosophy, the dictatorship of the proletariat is a condition in which the proletariat, or working class, holds control over state power. The dictatorship of the proletariat is the transitional phase from a capitalist to a communist economy, whereby the post-revolutionary state seizes the means of production, mandates the implementation of direct elections on behalf of and within the confines of the ruling proletarian state party, and institutes elected delegates into representative workers' councils that nationalise ownership of the means of production from private to collective ownership. During this phase, the administrative organizational structure of the party is to be largely determined by the need for it to govern firmly and wield state power to prevent counterrevolution, and to facilitate the transition to a lasting communist society.

The proletariat is the social class of wage-earners, those members of a society whose only possession of significant economic value is their labour power. A member of such a class is a proletarian or a proletaire. Marxist philosophy regards the proletariat under conditions of capitalism as an exploited class⁠—forced to accept meager wages in return for operating the means of production, which belong to the class of business owners, the bourgeoisie.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Utopian socialism</span> Political theory concerned with imagined socialist societies

Utopian socialism is the term often used to describe the first current of modern socialism and socialist thought as exemplified by the work of Henri de Saint-Simon, Charles Fourier, Étienne Cabet, and Robert Owen. Utopian socialism is often described as the presentation of visions and outlines for imaginary or futuristic ideal societies, with positive ideals being the main reason for moving society in such a direction. Later socialists and critics of utopian socialism viewed utopian socialism as not being grounded in actual material conditions of existing society. These visions of ideal societies competed with revolutionary and social democratic movements.

Permanent revolution is the strategy of a revolutionary class pursuing its own interests independently and without compromise or alliance with opposing sections of society. As a term within Marxist theory, it was first coined by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels as early as 1850, but since then different theorists - most notably Leon Trotsky (1879-1940) - have used the phrase to refer to different concepts.

Historical materialism is Karl Marx's theory of history. Marx located historical change in the rise of class societies and the way humans labor together to make their livelihoods.

A proletarian revolution or proletariat revolution is a social revolution in which the working class attempts to overthrow the bourgeoisie and change the previous political system. Proletarian revolutions are generally advocated by socialists, communists and anarchists.

References

  1. 1 2 "Bourgeois Revolution". TheFreeDictionary.com. Archived from the original on 21 September 2022. Retrieved 6 November 2018.
  2. Johnson, Walker & Gray (2014) , p. 118; Calvert (1990) , pp. 9–10; Hobsbawm (1989) , pp. 11–12
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 Eisenstein (2010) , p. 64, quoted in Davidson, Neil (2012). "From Society to Politics; From Event to Process". How Revolutionary Were the Bourgeois Revolutions?. Chicago, Illinois: Haymarket Books. pp. 381–382. ISBN   978-1-60846-067-0.
  4. 1 2 Callinicos 1989, pp. 113–171.
  5. Wilczynski, Jozef, ed. (1981). "Bourgeois Revolution". An Encyclopedic Dictionary of Marxism, Socialism and Communism. London: Macmillan Press. p. 48. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-05806-8. ISBN   978-1-349-05806-8.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Davidson, Neil (May 2012). "Bourgeois Revolution and the US Civil War". International Socialist Review. No. 83. Center For Economic Research and Social Change. Archived from the original on 27 December 2021.
  7. Post 2019, pp. 157–158.
  8. Plekhanov, Georgi (1949) [1895]. The Bourgeois Revolution: The Political Birth of Capitalism. Archived from the original on 1 September 2018 via Marxists Internet Archive.
  9. 1 2 "Stagism". Encyclopedia of Marxism. Archived from the original on 1 December 2017. Retrieved 6 November 2018 via Marxists Internet Archive.
  10. Lane, David (22 April 2020). "Revisiting Lenin's theory of socialist revolution on the 150th anniversary of his birth". European Politics and Policy. London School of Economics. Archived from the original on 3 May 2020.
  11. Caputo, Renato. "Grandezza e limiti della rivoluzione borghese in Marx" [Magnitude and limits of the bourgeois revolution in Marx]. La Città Futura (in Italian). Archived from the original on 6 March 2023. Retrieved 6 March 2023.
  12. Cervelli, Innocenzo (1976). "Sul concetto di rivoluzione borghese" [On the concept of bourgeois revolution]. Studi Storici (in Italian). 17 (1): 147–155. JSTOR   20564411 . Retrieved 6 March 2023.
  13. Calvert 1990, pp. 53–55.
  14. Gluckstein, Donny (7 October 2013). "Comment on bourgeois revolutions". International Socialism (140). Archived from the original on 18 May 2017.
  15. Post 2019, pp. 160–161, 166–167.
  16. Post 2019, pp. 160–161.
  17. Blackbourn, David. Economy and Society: A Silent Bourgeois Revolution. pp. 176–205. Archived from the original on 21 February 2023. in Blackbourn & Eley (1984)
  18. Hallas (1988) , pp. 17–20; Klíma (1986) , pp. 93–94; Calvert (1990) , pp. 53–55
  19. Blackbourn, David. Economy and Society: The shadow side. pp. 206–237. Archived from the original on 21 February 2023. in Blackbourn & Eley (1984)
  20. Davidson, Neil (2012). "Marx and Engels (2) 1847–52". How Revolutionary Were the Bourgeois Revolutions?. Chicago, Illinois: Haymarket Books. p. 144. ISBN   978-1-60846-067-0. In a world where most states have not yet experienced bourgeois revolutions, where most are even more economically underdeveloped than Germany, they too will give rise to "belated" bourgeoisies, the implication being that it is Germany rather than France that represents the likely pattern of bourgeois development.
  21. 1 2 "China: The bourgeois Revolution has been accomplished, the proletarian Revolution remains to be made". Communist Program (3). May 1977. Archived from the original on 10 October 2023 via International Library of the Communist Left.
  22. Post 2019, pp. 164–165.
  23. Marx & Engels 1956, 8, p. 197.
  24. Marx & Engels 1956, 16, p. 157.
  25. Marx & Engels 1956, 37, p. 463.
  26. Marx & Engels 1956, 8, p. 196.
  27. Marx & Engels 1956, 22, pp. 235–236.
  28. Elsenhans, Hartmut (2012). "Democratic revolution, bourgeois revolution, Arab revolution: The political economy of a possible success". NAQD. 29 (1): 51–60. doi:10.3917/naqd.029.0051. Archived from the original on 13 April 2023.
  29. Marx & Engels 1956, 17, p. 337.
  30. 1 2 Marx & Engels 1956, 17, p. 592.
  31. Heller 2006, Introduction pp. 2–4.
  32. Marx & Engels 1956, 23, pp. 741–761.
  33. Mollat, Michel [in French]; Wolff, Philippe [in French] (1970). Ongles bleus, jacques et ciompi - les révolutions populaires en Europe aux XIVe et XVe siècles[Ongles bleus, Jacquerie and Ciompi - popular revolutions in Europe in the 14th and 15th centuries] (in French). Calmann-Lévy.
  34. Pastor de Togneri, Reyna [in Spanish] (1973). Conflictos sociales y estancamiento económico en la España medieval[Social conflicts and economic stagnation in medieval Spain] (in Spanish). Editorial Ariel.
  35. Martín, José Luis. Historia de España[History of Spain (A society at war)]. Historia 16 (in Spanish). Vol. 4 - Una sociedad en guerra.
  36. Bak, Janos (2022) [1976]. "'The Peasant War in Germany' by Friedrich Engels – 125 years later". In Bak, Janos (ed.). The German Peasant War of 1525. Routledge. pp. 93–99. doi:10.4324/9781003190950. ISBN   978-1-00-319095-0. S2CID   241881702.
  37. Hallas 1988, pp. 17–20.
  38. Heller (2006) , Preface p. ix; Callinicos (1989) , pp. 113–171; Sewell (1994) , Introduction pp. 22–23
  39. Faulkner, Neil (24 October 2011). "A Marxist History of the World part 49: The French Revolution – Themidor, Directory and Napoleon". Counterfire . Archived from the original on 21 December 2023.
  40. Lutsky, Vladimir (1969). "VII The Conquest of the East Sudan by Mohammed Ali. The Expedition to Morea". Modern History of the Arab Countries via Marxists Internet Archive.
  41. Modern World History Writing Group 1973a, p. 172.
  42. Modern World History Writing Group 1973a, p. 233.
  43. 1 2 Klíma 1986, pp. 74–75.
  44. Modern World History Writing Group (1973a) , p. 255; Callinicos (1989) , pp. 113–171; Hallas (1988) , pp. 17–20; Klíma (1986) , pp. 74–75
  45. 1 2 Modern World History Writing Group 1973a.
  46. Klíma 1986, p. 77.
  47. 1 2 3 Post 2019, pp. 165–166.
  48. Faulkner, Neil (8 January 2012). "A Marxist History of the World part 57: The American Civil War". Counterfire . Archived from the original on 21 December 2023.
  49. Faulkner, Neil (18 January 2012). "A Marxist History of the World part 58: The Meiji Restoration". Counterfire . Archived from the original on 21 December 2023.
  50. Modern World History Writing Group 1973b, p. 150.
  51. Modern World History Writing Group 1973b, p. 130.
  52. Modern World History Writing Group 1973b, p. 152.
  53. Modern World History Writing Group 1973b, p. 160.
  54. Zhang, Yuchun; Ma, Zhenwen (1976). 简明中国近代史[A Concise Modern History of China] (in Chinese). Liaoning People's Publishing House. p. 301.
  55. Modern World History Writing Group 1973b, p. 224.
  56. Commission of the Central Committee of the CPSU (b), ed. (1938). "Istoriya Vsesoyuznoy kommunisticheskoy partii (bol'shevikov). Kratkiy kurs" История Всесоюзной коммунистической партии (большевиков). Краткий курс [History of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks). Short course] (in Russian). Archived from the original on 12 April 2023.
  57. Genkina, Esfir Borisovna [in Russian] (1927). Pokrovsky, Mikhail Nikolaevich [in Russian] (ed.). Fevral'skiy perevorot // Ocherki po istorii Oktyabr'skoy revolyutsiiФевральский переворот // Очерки по истории Октябрьской революции[The February coup // Essays on the history of the October Revolution] (in Russian). Vol. 2.
  58. Post 2019, pp. 160–163.
  59. Hoxha, Enver (1984). Reflections on the Middle East (PDF). pp. 254, 265–266 via Marxists Internet Archive. (254) From information we receive and the reports of news agencies which I read regularly, it is clear that regardless of the Islamic slogans which are used to show that the religious spirit is allegedly predominant in it, the Iranian revolution is an anti-feudal and anti-imperialist popular revolution. ... (265–266) The control of the situation has not slipped out of Khomeini's hands, but with the overthrow of the monarchy of the Pahlavis, with the liquidation of this mediaeval monarchy, the evolution in Iran has brought to the fore elements more organized, more radical, more progressive than Khomeini, elements who are operating for a democratic, bourgeois Iran with considerable rights. But we shall see to what extent they will achieve this aim.

Bibliography