China Circle

Last updated

China Circle refers to the economic relationship between mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. [1] With the fast-growing economy and the development of foreign investment in China, China has become the centre of the Asian market in the 1980s. The production chain in Taiwan and Hong Kong soon merged in China and formed a new economic network named "the Circle of China". [2]

Contents

Roles of the electronic industry

Japan

Japanese companies' investment is favoured in the China circle by the low operational costs. [3] The investment was beneficial to the investor and the host. Most Japanese technological and electronics brands prioritized China for its products and technologies. The circle disclosed other opportunities in Hong Kong and Taiwan. It expanded due to the foreign corporations' development in these regions. [4] The China Circle was entrusted as it protects the right of its members. Japanese companies were powerful in technological implementation; their collaboration with China Circle has gained enormous attention to attract other regions to join China Circle. [3] Members within China Circle supported the union due to the benefit of electronics companies. China Circle was established when the circle members were economically disadvantaged. The countries understood the importance of having a union with clear economic goals. Japanese corporations in China meant that the region's technological status was to improve. These technological companies allowed the local people to interact with the corporations on different levels. [5] The interaction between these Japanese electronics and the locals impacted their attitude towards technology and enabled knowledge exchange with other countries.

The cultural likeliness between Japan and China Circle members allowed Japanese companies to settle easily in the region. Most societal values connected Japanese entrepreneurs with different stakeholders in the China Circle market. The China Circle had the strongest bargaining power due to their collectiveness. The cultural similarity with Japan was an additional factor that enables the region to entice foreign brands. The Japanese entrepreneurs found most aspects of the region culture the same as Japanese cultural artefacts and belief systems. [6] Therefore, Japanese brands did not struggle to ensure that their workers are culturally competent. Integrating the Chinese and Japanese workers allowed the Japanese brand to settle. In 2012, 144,000 Japanese companies were operating in China. [7] The numbers do not include Japanese brands in Taiwan. Japanese companies that first settled in the China Circle gradually enticed other foreign brands in the region. The Japanese companies impacted the Chinese economy. The foreign commercial entities remitted their taxes. The presence of thousands of Japanese companies working in China depicts the Chinese market's flexibility to accommodate the Japanese business community in the country. [7] The China Circle succeeded in making the right convenient. Similarly, the excellent rapport between different stakeholders the foreigners made China desirable. [8] Cultural uniformity in some aspects made Japanese entrepreneurs feel at home while in China. The China Circle compromised nearby nations that have some similarities. Therefore, some Japanese tech companies extended their operations to other circle's regions. The Chinese technological industry was also in the infancy states. As a result, the foreign tech companies were integral in improving Chinese technological advancements. [3] The culture, together with the goodwill from the people allowed Japanese brands to advance in the China Circle. The interaction with the circle enabled the entrepreneurs to consider other profitable regions within the China Circle.

USA

American electronic brands were successful in the international market. The achievements and favourable conditions in China allowed Americans to invest in these regions. Edge Electronic Group, Philips Electronics, and Electric Vehicles USA, Inc. are American electronic brands that accessed the Chinese market and the circle. American brands were powerful. The corporations became successful in China due to the favourable conditions in the region. American electronic brands in China remitted taxes to the government. [9] The taxes from electronic brands invested in either country within the China Circle benefitted the circle members. American electronic corporations in the region employed the locals. Reduced unemployment rates help most households in Taiwan, Hong Kong, China. The three countries in the China Circle shared close geographical locations. It is easy for the circle to request foreign electronic corporations to invest within the member countries. [10] Three countries benefited from the China Circle as it creates a rapport that enabled locals from circle members to migrate in search of employment. American and Japanese electronic brands improved cohesion among the circle members. As countries engaged one another when interacting with foreign investors, civilians within these nations were moving with the China Circle searching for jobs. [10]

American electronics companies operating in the China Circle understood the opportunity in the China Circle. The opportunities in the market were unexplored and American companies’ arrival was a strategic decision. The exhibition of interest to invest in the China Circle indicated that the companies were aiming at all China Circle members. [1] At that time, some electronics equipment was unavailable in the China Circle market. However, American electronics companies operating in the circle allowed the region's buyers to access other items that are unavailable in the domestic market. Similarly, American electronics organizations intensified pressure on the China Circle's markets. [11] The buyer had alternatives that were missing before. Therefore, American brands continued to grow as other domestic companies. The circle members also improved their products' quality to avoid being rendered irrelevant. The Chinese market environment was suitable for foreign brands. Similarly, domestic companies started manufacturing electronics. The partnership between the local and American electronics allowed domestic electronics companies in the China Circle to advance their production levels. [1]

The United States strong global status quo and perfect diplomatic relationship with China Circle member states favoured American electronics companies. [12] The US was influential in international commercial engagements. Therefore, American companies willing to operate in the China Circle faced limited challenges in their efforts to access the China Circle. [13] Besides, the impeccable diplomatic rapport between the US and the China Circle member states allowed the circle leadership to accept American electronics brands to operate within the China Circle. The trade engagement between the China Circle member states and the US through the US electronics brands opened up the American market to the circle member states. [14] The US electronic companies were commercial entities that aimed profit maximization. Similarly, the China Circle intended to benefit from American electronics companies' presence in their region. [15] Therefore, the interaction between the circle and US electronics brands benefitted all the involved parties. The China Circle was championing for the commercial benefit of all its members. The American electronics companies exploited different places within the China Circle to ensure that their affiliate companies are spread across the circle. China benefitted more than the other circle member states due to their authority in the region. The China Circle entanglement with the US electronics companies played a crucial role in instilling the Chinese current technological advancement. [13] The domestic electronic companies borrowed a lot from the US electronic brands. The American electronics industry was more advanced than the Chinese electronics industry. Therefore, the foreign electronics companies' arrival in the China Circle member states was resourceful for the domestic companies. [9]

Economic growth model

The China circle's purpose is to improve the economic status of both the people and the country. The selected growth model displayed the circle's intent. It was engaging both internal and external players to protect the circle and members' interests. The China Circle realized that household is a crucial area to initiate economic growth. The circle improved per capita within the household in Hong Kong, Taiwan, and China. Focusing on the household allows the concerned parties to obtain crucial information about the family's economic statuses. [16] China knew that the low operational costs in the region thrilled most investors. The China circle selected an economic growth model that aimed at benefitting families. The foreign companies in China employed the locals. The authorities wanted to examine the impact of these industrial activities on the household. Families were receiving electronics from the company. [17] The model considered various activities at the household level. The household per capita income selected as the economic growth model considered the economic interests of individual circle members.

The China Circle enhances household per capita income. The economic growth model enables these countries to advance their economic status. The circle has united Taiwan, Hong Kong, and South Coast provinces of China into a powerful bloc. [1] The merger has a strong bargaining power when engaging foreigners in the economic initiative. These countries understood the value of having a single voice to articulate their economic desires. The circle was important for the members. China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong developed a strong trade relationship that allowed them to trade. [18] The China Circle enabled the member countries to experience economic growth as a region. The China Circle benefitted the circle members on different levels. The intertwined interests among Hong Kong, Taiwan, and China allowed the countries to engage each other in economic activities. The household per capita income selected as the economic growth model considered the economic interests of individual circle members.

Chinese Economic Area

The Chinese economic area covered Taiwan, Hong Kong, and China. The China Circle represented the Chinese economic area. The Chinese economic area shared the same geographical location and characteristics. [19] Similarly, the region had a similar economic desire expressed in the china circle. As a result, it is easy for the Chinese economic area to work in unity through their circle. The Chinese economic area was a collection of different countries. However, China was geographically located to facilitate its neighbours' economic activities. As a result, China played a crucial role in enabling its economic area to achieve the desired results. Before developing the China circle, China and Taiwan did not have a perfect diplomatic relationship. [20] The political and other differences tainted the diplomatic engagement between China and Taiwan. Still, the countries became part of the Chinese economic area. The region shared the same desire when developing the China Circle. As a result, China and Taiwan set aside their differences to enable the Chinese economic area to achieve its goals. The continuous engagement and introduction of various economic policies enabled Taiwan and China to cease their rivalry. [19] Chinese economic area was crucial for the China circle members who had similar economic concerns when uniting. The unity was crucial in boosting the circle member states bargaining power. China was a prominent nation in the circle. Still, the member states prioritized collective interests to avoid inner conflicts and power wrangles.

Cross-Strait ties

Taiwan political status compromised the relationship between the country and China. Taiwan and China were a crucial player in the China Circle. [21] China split into two in 1949 was another stumbling block between Taiwan and China. Since 1949, Taiwan and China have had limited contact, creating tension between these disputing countries. [22] Therefore, their misunderstanding was detrimental to the Chinese economic area before the China Circle formation. [23] China was experiencing a political crisis. The political instability threatened the country. Taiwan and China maintained limited contact. Fewer interactions created tension between these disputing countries. The idea to have the China circle came when Taiwan and China had a strained relationship. [24] It was hard at the beginning to enrol the circle. Therefore, Taiwan and China did not engage each other directly due to their hostilities initially. The circle ensured that nations' enmities did not compromise their performance. There were high chances that the circle could not achieve its goals due to nations' differences. However, despite the speculations the circle became crucial in helping the disputing countries attain their economic goals. [25] The interactions also benefitted the rivals' countries to achieve satisfaction beyond the economic prosperity. The China Circle's objective demanded collective input to benefit the entire region. [26] Therefore, having a cordial relationship was a requirement for the circle's states. The uniformity in the China Circle was beneficial in improving diplomatic relationships. The domestic companies also expanded their services to other circle member states to maximize their profits. [25]

Early Chinese dynasties violated cross-Strait relations' demands. The dynasties were required to exchange their cultures with Taiwan. [26] Unfortunately, Taiwan adhered to the condition whereas China dynasties retained their culture. As a result, Taiwan felt betrayed. The dissatisfaction compromised Taiwan-China ties. [27] Therefore, developing the China Circle was a vibrant idea birthed when Taiwan and China were still at loggerheads. The two countries were crucial for the merger. Therefore, carrying the enmity to the China Circle was avoided situation due to its repercussion. The entire merger and the innocent members were at risk. [28] Amending diplomatic differences for the China circle's prosperity was a beneficial decision for both two Taiwan and China and the circle. The circle members understood the merger value. As a result, the circle was determined to eliminate the rivalry between Taiwan and China. The commercial goal was a vital assignment requiring collective commitment.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Foreign relations of Hong Kong</span> Overview of the foreign relations of Hong Kong

Under the Basic Law, the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region is exclusively in charge of its internal affairs, whilst the central government of China is responsible for its foreign affairs and defence. As a separate customs territory, Hong Kong maintains and develops relations with foreign states and regions, and plays an active role in such international organisations as World Trade Organization (WTO) and the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) in its own right under the name of Hong Kong, China. Hong Kong participates in 16 projects of United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mainland China</span> Geopolitical area known as the Peoples Republic of China

"Mainland China", also referred to as "the Chinese mainland", is a geopolitical term defined as the territory under direct administration of the People's Republic of China (PRC) in the aftermath of the Chinese Civil War. In addition to the geographical mainland, the geopolitical sense of the term includes islands such as Hainan, Chongming, and Zhoushan. By convention, territories outside of mainland China include:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chinese unification</span> Potential union of mainland China and Taiwan

Chinese unification, also known as Cross-Strait unification or Chinese reunification, is the potential unification of territories currently controlled, or claimed, by the People's Republic of China and the Republic of China ("Taiwan") under one political entity, possibly the formation of a political union between the two republics. Together with full Taiwan independence, unification is one of the main proposals to address questions on the political status of Taiwan, which is a central focus of Cross-Strait relations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Four Asian Tigers</span> Economies of South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore and Hong Kong

The Four Asian Tigers are the developed Asian economies of Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan. Between the early 1950s and 1990s, they underwent rapid industrialization and maintained exceptionally high growth rates of more than 7 percent a year.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">China–United States relations</span> Bilateral relations

The relationship between the People's Republic of China (PRC) and the United States of America (USA) has been complex and at times contentious since the establishment of the PRC and the retreat of the government of the Republic of China to Taiwan in 1949. Since the normalization of relations in the 1970s, the US–China relationship has been marked by numerous perennial disputes including the political status of Taiwan, territorial disputes in the South China Sea, and more recently the treatment of Uyghurs in Xinjiang. They have significant economic ties and are significantly intertwined, yet they also have a global hegemonic great power rivalry. As of 2023, China and the United States are the world's second-largest and largest economies by nominal GDP, as well as the largest and second-largest economies by GDP (PPP) respectively. Collectively, they account for 44.2% of the global nominal GDP, and 34.7% of global PPP-adjusted GDP.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Japan–China Joint Communiqué</span> 1972 treaty between Japan and China

The Joint Communique of the Government of Japan and the Government of the People's Republic of China was signed on September 29, 1972, in Beijing. The communique established and normalized diplomatic relations between Japan and the People's Republic of China (PRC), resulted in the severing of official relations between Japan and the Republic of China (ROC) in Taiwan. The document produced nine articles in a joint statement, showing compromises on previously ambiguous principles enunciated by both sides. Of these, four points are particularly worthy of attention:

  1. the desire for a peace treaty between Japan and China;
  2. the statement that Japan "understands and respects [China's] stance" that Taiwan is part of the PRC;
  3. an Asia-Pacific anti-hegemony clause;
  4. Japan's reversal of relations with China and Taiwan.

The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) is a cabinet-level administrative agency under the Executive Yuan of the Republic of China (Taiwan). The MAC is responsible for the planning, development, and implementation of the Cross-Strait relations policy which targets mainland China, Hong Kong and Macau.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">C-pop</span> Chinese popular music genre

C-pop is an abbreviation for Chinese popular music, a loosely defined musical genre by artists originating from mainland China, Hong Kong and Taiwan. This also includes countries where Chinese languages are used by parts of the population, such as Singapore and Malaysia. C-pop is used as an umbrella term covering not only Chinese pop but also R&B, ballads, Chinese rock, Chinese hip hop and Chinese ambient music, although Chinese rock diverged during the early 1990s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of Asia</span>

The economy of Asia comprises about 4.7 billion people living in 50 different nations. Asia is the fastest growing economic region, as well as the largest continental economy by both GDP Nominal and PPP in the world. Moreover, Asia is the site of some of the world's longest modern economic booms.

In justifying opening up and the series of economic reforms that ensued in China, Deng Xiaoping referred to Karl Marx and his theories, which predicted that nations need to undergo urbanization and a stage of capitalism for a natural socialist transition. One of the most renowned reforms under Deng was establishing four "special economic zones" along the Southeastern coast of China, with Shenzhen, Shantou, and Zhuhai located in Guangdong province and Xiamen located in Fujian province. The four aforementioned special economic zones were all established from 1980 to 1981. As of 2024, there have been 3 additional special economic zones. In 1988, Hainan became the fifth "SEZ". In 1990, Pudong district in Shanghai became the sixth "SEZ". In 2009, Binhai district in Tianjin became the seventh "SEZ". Special economic zones (SEZs) in mainland China are granted more free market-oriented economic policies and flexible governmental measures by the government of China, compared to the planned economy elsewhere.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cross-Strait relations</span> Bilateral relations between China and Taiwan

Cross-Strait relations are the relations between China and Taiwan.

The Taiwan Miracle or Taiwan Economic Miracle refers to Taiwan's rapid economic development to a developed, high-income country during the latter half of the twentieth century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States foreign policy toward the People's Republic of China</span>

The United States foreign policy toward the People's Republic of China originated during the Cold War. At that time, the U.S. had a containment policy against communist states. The leaked Pentagon Papers indicated the efforts by the U.S. to contain China through military actions undertaken in the Vietnam War. The containment policy centered around an island chain strategy. President Richard Nixon's China rapprochement signaled a shift in focus to gain leverage in containing the Soviet Union. Formal diplomatic ties between the U.S. and China were established in 1979, and with normalized trade relations since 2000, the U.S. and China have been linked by closer economic ties and more cordial relations. In his first term as U.S. president, Barack Obama said, "We want China to succeed and prosper. It's good for the United States if China continues on the path of development that it's on".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">East Asia</span> Subregion of the Asian continent

East Asia is a region of Asia, which is defined in both geographical and ethno-cultural terms. The modern states of East Asia include China, Japan, Mongolia, North Korea, South Korea, and Taiwan. Hong Kong and Macau, two coastal cities located in the south of China, are autonomous regions under Chinese sovereignty. The economies of Japan, South Korea, China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Macau are some of the world's largest and most prosperous economies. East Asia borders Siberia and the Russian Far East to the north, Southeast Asia to the south, South Asia to the southwest, and Central Asia to the west. To the east is the Pacific Ocean and to the southeast is Micronesia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Russia–Taiwan relations</span> Bilateral relations

Russia–Taiwan relations or Taiwan–Russia relations are the bilateral foreign relations between Taiwan and Russia. Due to the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, relations became tense after Taiwan imposed sanctions against Russia. Russia placed Taiwan on a list of "unfriendly countries", along with South Korea, Japan, Singapore, the United States, European Union members, NATO members, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Norway, Switzerland, Micronesia and Ukraine.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">China–Ireland relations</span> Bilateral relations

China–Ireland relations are interstate relations of China and Ireland. Ireland and China first established their bilateral foreign relations after they signed the Communique on the Establishment of Diplomatic Relations on 22 June 1979. This milestone opened the gate for trades, businesses, politics, education, and tourism between the two countries; both nations have gained enormous growth of economic values. Both countries exchanged ambassadors in 1980. Ireland has an embassy in Beijing, a general consulate in Shanghai and an honorary consulate in Hong Kong; China has an embassy in Dublin. The first historical meeting for the two headers of China and Ireland governments took place in November 1996 when Premier Li Peng met with Taoiseach John Bruton at the World Food Summit. By 2019, this bilateral relationship has boomed to a high point, and a ceremony of their 40th anniversary of diplomatic relations was held in Dublin, Ireland in June 2019.

The East Asian model, pioneered by Japan, is a plan for economic growth whereby the government invests in certain sectors of the economy in order to stimulate the growth of specific industries in the private sector. It generally refers to the model of development pursued in East Asian economies such as Japan, South Korea, Hong Kong and Taiwan. It has also been used by some to describe the contemporary economic system in Mainland China after Deng Xiaoping's economic reforms during the late 1970s and the current economic system of Vietnam after its Đổi Mới policy was implemented in 1986. Generally, as a country becomes more developed, the most common employment industry transitions from agriculture to manufacturing, and then to services.

A de facto embassy is an office or organisation that serves de facto as an embassy in the absence of normal or official diplomatic relations among countries, usually to represent nations which lack full diplomatic recognition, regions or dependencies of countries, or territories over which sovereignty is disputed. In some cases, diplomatic immunity and extraterritoriality may be granted.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Otto C.C. Lin</span> Chinese chemist (born 1938)

Otto Lin was born Chui Chau Lin (林垂宙) in Shantou, Guangdong, China, in 1938. He came to Hong Kong as a refugee and went to Taiwan in 1953 where education at K-12 level was free. He attended National Taiwan University and received a BS in chemical engineering in 1960. After serving in ROTC, he was admitted to University of Illinois at Champaign-Urbana for post-graduate studies. Later he transferred to Columbia University in the City of New York, received the Ph.D. degree in 1967 in chemistry. His doctoral research was on the relationship of macromolecular conformation and hydrodynamic properties of DNA.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hong Kong–South Africa relations</span> Bilateral relations

Hong Kong–South Africa relations refers to the current and historical relationship between Hong Kong, a Special Administrative Region (SAR) of the People's Republic of China, and the Republic of South Africa.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 Naughton, Barry (1997). "The China Circle". Brookings. Archived from the original on 2021-05-19. Retrieved 2021-05-19.
  2. ↑ Naughton, Barry (2007). "The Chinese Economy" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-05-26.
  3. 1 2 3 Ernst, Dieter (1997). "Partners for the China Circle? The Asian Production Networks of Japanese Electronics Firms". doi:10.2139/ssrn.43300. S2CID   110266102. SSRN   43300.
  4. ↑ Clough, R.D (2019). Taiwan-PRC relations. Routledge. pp. 215–234.
  5. ↑ Helleiner, E; Wang, H (2018). "Beyond the tributary tradition of Chinese IPE: the indigenous roots of early Chinese economic nationalism". The Chinese Journal of International Politics. 11 (4): 451–483. doi: 10.1093/cjip/poy016 .
  6. ↑ Lin, S.S (2021). Analyzing the relationship between identity and democratization in Taiwan and Hong Kong in the shadow of China. In Democratization, National Identity and Foreign Policy in Asia. Routledge. pp. 119–138.
  7. 1 2 Song, L; Zhou, Y; Hurst, L (2019). The Chinese Economic Transformation. ANU Press. pp. 332–336.
  8. ↑ Wong, S; Lee, K; Clarke, H (2019). "Immigrant influx and generational politics: A comparative case study of Hong Kong and Taiwan". Electoral Studies. 58: 84–93. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2018.12.008. hdl: 10397/95245 . ISSN   0261-3794. S2CID   158462112.
  9. 1 2 Bennett, David; Kirit Vaidya; Hongyu Zhao; Xingming Wang; Huyu Ping (1996). "China's Electronics Industry and the Globalised Technology Market". doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.4730.6089.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  10. 1 2 Rawski, Thomas G; Li, Lillian M (1992). "Chinese History in Economic Perspective". publishing.cdlib.org. Archived from the original on 2012-09-09. Retrieved 2021-05-19.
  11. ↑ Fong, B.C.H; Wu, JM; Nathan, AJ (2020). Fong, Brian C. H; Wu, Jieh-min; Nathan, Andrew J (eds.). China's Influence and the Center-periphery Tug of War in Hong Kong, Taiwan and Indo-Pacific (1st ed.). Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003088431. ISBN   9781003088431. S2CID   228919100.
  12. ↑ Maizland, L (2021). "Why China-Taiwan Relations Are So Tense". Council on Foreign Relations. Archived from the original on 2021-05-10. Retrieved 2021-05-19.
  13. 1 2 Yan, Y (2019). The Three-Circle Theory and China's Periods of Strategic Opportunity. Springer, Singapore. pp. 65–88.
  14. ↑ Wong, Wai Kwok Benson (2019-04-08). "The ties that bind: mutuality of political destiny between Hong Kong and Taiwan". Asian Education and Development Studies. 8 (2): 137–148. doi:10.1108/AEDS-07-2018-0117. ISSN   2046-3162. S2CID   159225966.
  15. ↑ Li, Yitan; Zhang, Enyu (2017-03-01). "Changing Taiwanese Identity and Cross-Strait Relations: a Post 2016 Taiwan Presidential Election Analysis". Journal of Chinese Political Science. 22 (1): 17–35. doi:10.1007/s11366-016-9452-9. ISSN   1874-6357. S2CID   151317832.
  16. ↑ Shrestha, Prakash Kumar (2013). "Economic development in South and East Asia: empirical examination of East Asian Development Model". Asia-Pacific Development Journal. 20 (2): 1–28. doi:10.18356/33b97c0a-en.
  17. ↑ Liu, Shucheng (2017). Chinese Economic Growth and Fluctuations. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315708430. ISBN   978-1-315-70843-0.
  18. ↑ Wu, L (2020). The Development of Economic History in the People's Republic of China. Springer, Singapore. pp. 595–622.
  19. 1 2 Randal, Jones; King, Robert E; Klein, Michael (1993). "Economic Integration Between Hong Kong. Taiwan And The Coastal Provinces Of CHINA" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2012-12-07.
  20. ↑ Cabestan, Jean-Pierre (2017). "Beijing's Policy Towards President Tsai Ying-wen and the Future of Cross-Strait Relations". The Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations.
  21. ↑ Affairs, Ministry of Foreign (2021-05-19). Ministry of Foreign Affairs http://www.taiwan.gov.tw/content_3.php . Retrieved 2021-05-19.{{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  22. ↑ T, H (2015). "Unbridgeable divide? The China-Taiwan schism since 1949". Hindustan Times. Archived from the original on 2015-11-07. Retrieved 2021-05-19.
  23. ↑ Tsai, Tung-chieh; Liu, Tony Tai-ting (2017-04-01). "Cross-Strait Relations and Regional Integration: A Review of the Ma Ying-jeou Era (2008–2016)". Journal of Current Chinese Affairs. 46 (1): 11–35. doi: 10.1177/186810261704600102 . ISSN   1868-1026. S2CID   54636676.
  24. ↑ Chiang, Min-Hua; Gerbier, Bernard (2013). "Cross-Strait Economic Relations: Recent Development and Implications for Taiwan". Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs. 13.
  25. 1 2 Clark, Cal (2007), Horowitz, Shale; Heo, Uk; Tan, Alexander C. (eds.), "Economic Integration between China and Taiwan: No Spillover into the Identity and Security Realms", Identity and Change in East Asian Conflicts: The Cases of China, Taiwan, and the Koreas, New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, pp. 71–90, doi:10.1057/9780230603134_4, ISBN   978-0-230-60313-4 , retrieved 2021-05-19
  26. 1 2 Schreer, Benjamin (2017). "The Double-Edged Sword of Coercion: Cross-Strait Relations After the 2016 Taiwan Elections". Asian Politics & Policy (in Korean). 9 (1): 50–65. doi:10.1111/aspp.12290. ISSN   1943-0787.
  27. ↑ Krumbein, Frédéric (2020-09-01). "The human rights gap in the Taiwan Strait: how China pushes Taiwan towards the US". The Pacific Review. 35 (3): 383–414. doi:10.1080/09512748.2020.1812699. ISSN   0951-2748. S2CID   225334021.
  28. ↑ Jiang, Yi-huah (2017-10-03). "Taiwan's National Identity and Cross-Strait Relations". University of California Press: 19–41. doi: 10.1525/luminos.38.b . ISBN   9780520295988.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.