Four Asian Tigers | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chinese name | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Traditional Chinese | 亞洲四小龍 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Simplified Chinese | 亚洲四小龙 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Literal meaning | Asia's Four Little Dragons | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Korean name | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hangul | 아시아의네마리용 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hanja | 亞細亞의네마리龍 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Literal meaning | Asia's four dragons | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Malay name | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Malay | Empat Harimau Asia | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tamil name | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tamil | நான்குஆசியப்புலிகள் |
The Four Asian Tigers (a.k.a. the Four Asian Dragons or Four Little Dragons in Chinese and Korean) are the developed Asian economies of Hong Kong,Singapore,South Korea,and Taiwan. [1] Between the early 1950s and 1990s,they underwent rapid industrialization and maintained exceptionally high growth rates of more than 7 percent a year.
By the early 21st century,these economies had developed into high-income economies,specializing in areas of competitive advantage. Hong Kong and Singapore have become leading international financial centres,whereas South Korea and Taiwan are leaders in manufacturing electronic components and devices. Large institutions have pushed to have them serve as role models for many developing countries,especially the Tiger Cub Economies of Southeast Asia. [2] [3] [4]
In 1993,a World Bank report The East Asian Miracle credited neoliberal policies with the economic boom,including the maintenance of export-oriented policies,low taxes and minimal welfare states. Institutional analyses found that some level of state intervention was involved. [5] Some analysts argued that industrial policy and state intervention had a much greater influence than the World Bank report suggested. [6] [7]
Prior to the 1997 Asian financial crisis,the growth of the Four Asian Tiger economies (commonly referred to as "the Asian Miracle") has been attributed to export oriented policies and strong development policies. Unique to these economies were the sustained rapid growth and high levels of equal income distribution. A World Bank report suggests two development policies among others as sources for the Asian miracle:factor accumulation and macroeconomic management. [9]
The Hong Kong economy was the first out of the four to undergo industrialization with the development of a textile industry in the 1950s. By the 1960s,manufacturing in the British colony had expanded and diversified to include clothing,electronics,and plastics for export orientation. [10] Following Singapore's independence from Malaysia,the Economic Development Board formulated and implemented national economic strategies to promote the country's manufacturing sector. [11] Industrial estates were set up and foreign investment was attracted to the country with tax incentives. Meanwhile,Taiwan and South Korea began to industrialize in the mid-1960s with heavy government involvement including initiatives and policies. Both countries pursued export-oriented industrialization as in Hong Kong and Singapore. [12] The four countries were inspired by Japan's evident success,and they collectively pursued the same goal by investing in the same categories:infrastructure and education. They also benefited from foreign trade advantages that set them apart from other countries,most significantly economic support from the United States;part of this is manifested in the proliferation of American electronic products in common households of the Four Tigers.[ citation needed ]
By the end of the 1960s,levels in physical and human capital in the four economies far exceeded other countries at similar levels of development. This subsequently led to a rapid growth in per capita income levels. While high investments were essential to their economic growth,the role of human capital was also important. Education in particular is cited as playing a major role in the Asian economic miracle. The levels of education enrollment in the Four Asian Tigers were higher than predicted given their level of income. By 1965,all four nations had achieved universal primary education. [9] South Korea in particular had achieved a secondary education enrollment rate of 88% by 1987. [9] There was also a notable decrease in the gap between male and female enrollments during the Asian miracle. Overall these advances in education allowed for high levels of literacy and cognitive skills.
The creation of stable macroeconomic environments was the foundation upon which the Asian miracle was built. Each of the Four Asian Tiger states managed,to various degrees of success,three variables in:budget deficits,external debt and exchange rates. Each Tiger nation's budget deficits were kept within the limits of their financial limits,as to not destabilize the macro-economy. South Korea in particular had deficits lower than the OECD average in the 1980s. External debt was non-existent for Hong Kong,Singapore and Taiwan,as they did not borrow from abroad. [9] Although South Korea was the exception to this –its debt to GNP ratio was quite high during the period 1980–1985,it was sustained by the country's high level of exports. Exchange rates in the Four Asian Tiger nations had been changed from long-term fixed rate regimes to fixed-but-adjustable rate regimes with the occasional steep devaluation of managed floating rate regimes. [9] This active exchange rate management allowed the Four Tiger economies to avoid exchange rate appreciation and maintain a stable real exchange rate.
Export policies have been the de facto reason for the rise of these Four Asian Tiger economies. The approach taken has been different among the four nations. Hong Kong,and Singapore introduced trade regimes that were neoliberal in nature and encouraged free trade,while South Korea and Taiwan adopted mixed regimes that accommodated their own export industries. In Hong Kong and Singapore,due to small domestic markets,domestic prices were linked to international prices. South Korea and Taiwan introduced export incentives for the traded-goods sector. The governments of Singapore,South Korea and Taiwan also worked to promote specific exporting industries,which were termed as an export push strategy. All these policies helped these four nations to achieve a growth averaging 7.5% each year for three decades and as such they achieved developed country status. [13]
Dani Rodrik,economist at the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University,has in a number of studies argued that state intervention was important in the East Asian growth miracle. [14] [6] He has argued "it is impossible to understand the East Asian growth miracle without appreciating the important role that government policy played in stimulating private investment". [6]
The Tiger economies experienced a setback in the 1997 Asian financial crisis. Hong Kong came under intense speculative attacks against its stock market and currency necessitating unprecedented market interventions by the state Hong Kong Monetary Authority. South Korea was hit the hardest as its foreign debt burdens swelled resulting in its currency falling between 35 and 50%. [15] By the beginning of 1997,the stock market in Hong Kong,Singapore,and South Korea also saw losses of at least 60% in dollar terms. Singapore and Taiwan were relatively unscathed. The Four Asian Tigers recovered from the 1997 crisis faster than other countries due to various economic advantages including their high savings rate (except South Korea) and their openness to trade. [15]
The export-oriented tiger economies,which benefited from American consumption,were hit hard by the financial crisis of 2007–08. By the fourth quarter of 2008,the GDP of all four nations fell by an average annualized rate of around 15%. [13] Exports also fell by a 50% annualized rate. [13] Weak domestic demand also affected the recovery of these economies. In 2008,retail sales fell 3% in Hong Kong,6% in Singapore and 11% in Taiwan. [13]
As the world recovered from the financial crisis,the Four Asian Tiger economies have also rebounded strongly. This is due in no small part to each country's government fiscal stimulus measures. These fiscal packages accounted for more than 4% of each country's GDP in 2009. [13] Another reason for the strong bounce back is the modest corporate and household debt in these four nations. [13]
A 2011 article published in Applied Economics Letters by financial economist Mete Feridun of University of Greenwich Business School and his international colleagues investigates the causal relationship between financial development and economic growth for Thailand,Indonesia,Malaysia,the Philippines,China,India and Singapore for the period between 1979 and 2009,using Johansen cointegration tests and vector error correction models. The results suggest that in the case of Indonesia,Singapore,the Philippines,China and India financial development leads to economic growth,whereas in the case of Thailand there exists a bidirectional causality between these variables. The results further suggest that in the case of Malaysia,financial development does not seem to cause economic growth. [16]
In 2018,the combined economy of the Four Asian Tigers constituted 3.46% of the world's economy with a total Gross domestic product (GDP) of 2,932 billion US dollars. The GDP in Hong Kong,Singapore,South Korea and Taiwan was worth 363.03 billion,361.1 billion,1,619.42 billion and 589.39 billion US dollars respectively in 2018,which represented 0.428%,0.426%,1.911% and 0.696% of the world economy. Together,their combined economy surpassed the United Kingdom's GDP of 3.34% of the world's economy some time in the mid-2010s. In 2021,each of the Four Asian Tigers' GDP Per capita (nominal) exceeds $30,000 according to IMF's estimate.
The four governments focused on investing heavily in their infrastructure as well as education to benefit their country through skilled workers and higher level jobs such as engineers and doctors. The policy was generally successful and helped develop the countries into more advanced and high-income industrialized developed countries. For example,all four countries have become global education centers with Singapore,Taiwan,South Korea and Hong Kong high school students scoring well on math and science exams such as the PISA exam [ citation needed ] and with Taiwanese students winning several medals in International Olympiads. [17]
In relation to higher-level education,there are many prestigious colleges as in most developed countries. In the 2023 QS University Rankings,the top 100 universities in the world include 5 universities from Hong Kong,6 universities from South Korea,2 from Singapore and 1 from Taiwan. Despite the small populations and the relatively short history of universities in the four countries,they together account for a quarter of the top 100 universities located outside of the United States or the United Kingdom. Notable schools include the National Taiwan University,Chinese University of Hong Kong,The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology,Seoul National University,National University of Singapore,Nanyang Technological University and University of Hong Kong. The cities of Hong Kong,Singapore and Seoul are prominent hubs in higher education.
The role of Confucianism has been used to explain the success of the Four Asian Tigers. This conclusion is similar to the Protestant work ethic theory in the West promoted by German sociologist Max Weber in his book The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism . The culture of Confucianism is said to have been compatible with industrialization because it valued stability,hard work,discipline,and loyalty and respect towards authority figures. [18] There is a significant influence of Confucianism on the corporate and political institutions of the Asian Tigers. Prime Minister of Singapore Lee Kuan Yew advocated Asian values as an alternative to the influence of Western culture in Asia. [19] This theory was not without its critics. There was a lack of mainland Chinese economic success during the same time frame as the Four Tigers,and yet China was the birthplace of Confucianism. During the May Fourth Movement of 1919,Confucianism was blamed for China's inability to compete with Western powers. [18]
In 1996,the economist Joseph Stiglitz pointed out that,ironically,"not that long ago,the Confucian heritage,with its emphasis on traditional values,was cited as an explanation for why these countries had not grown." [20]
Parts of this article (those related to Territory and region data) need to be updated.(June 2024) |
Country or territory | Fitch | Moody's | S&P |
---|---|---|---|
Hong Kong | AA [21] | Aa2 [22] | AA+ [23] |
Singapore | AAA [24] | Aaa [25] | AAA |
South Korea | AA− [26] | Aa2 [27] | AA [28] |
Taiwan | AA [29] | Aa3 [30] | AA+ [31] |
Country or territory | Area (km2) | Population (2020) [32] | Population density (per km2) | Life expectancy at birth (2020) [33] | Median age (2020) | Birth rate (2015) | Death rate (2011) | Fertility rate (2020) | Net migration rate (2015–2020) | Population growth rate (2015) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hong Kong | 1,106 | 7,496,981 | 7,140 | 85.29 | 45 | 0.8% | 0.6% | 0.87 [34] | 0.40% | 0.82 |
Singapore | 728 | 5,850,342 | 8,358 | 84.07 | 42 | 0.9% | 0.45% | 1.10 [35] | 0.47% | 0.79 |
South Korea | 100,210 | 51,269,185 | 527 | 83.50 | 44 | 0.8% | 0.51% | 0.84 [36] | 0.02% | 0.09 |
Taiwan | 36,197 | 23,816,775 | 673 | 81.04 | 42 | 0.8% | 0.66% | 0.99 [37] | 0.13% | 0.18 |
Country or territory | GDP (millions of USD, 2021 estimates) | GDP per capita (USD, 2022 estimated) | Trade (billions of USD, 2016) | (billions of USD, 2017) | Industrial growth rate (%) (2017) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nominal | PPP | Nominal | PPP | Exports | Imports | |||
Hong Kong | 369,722 | 488,654 | 49,850 | 65,403 | 1,236 | 496.9 | 558.6 | 1.2 |
Singapore | 378,645 | 615,293 | 79,576 | 107,677 | 917 | 372.9 | 327.4 | -3.5 |
South Korea | 1,823,852 | 2,503,395 | 34,944 | 48,309 | 1,103 | 577.4 | 457.5 | -1.5 |
Taiwan | 785,589 | 1,443,411 | 36,051 | 61,371 | 604 | 344.6 | 272.6 | 1.2 |
Country or territory | Human Development Index (2021 data) | Income inequality by Gini coefficient | Median household income (2013), USD PPP [38] | Median per-capita income (2013), USD PPP [38] | Global Well Being Index (2010), % thriving [39] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hong Kong | 0.952 (4th) | 53.9 (2016) | 35,443 | 9,705 | 19% |
Singapore | 0.939 (12th) | 46.4 (2014) | 32,360 | 7,345 | 19% |
South Korea | 0.925 (19th) | 34.1 (2015) | 40,861 | 11,350 | 28% |
Taiwan | 0.926 (–) [a] | 33.6 (2014) | 32,762 | 6,882 | 22% |
Country or territory | Average Internet connection speed (2020) [45] | Smartphone usage (2016) | Use of renewable electricity |
---|---|---|---|
Hong Kong | 21.8 Mbit/s | 87% [46] | 0.3% |
Singapore | 47.5 Mbit/s | 100% [47] | 3.3% |
South Korea | 59.6 Mbit/s | 89% | 2.1% |
Taiwan | 28.9 Mbit/s | 78% [48] | 4.4% |
Country or territory | Democracy Index (2022) | Press Freedom Index (2023) [49] | Corruption Perceptions Index (2022) | Global Competitiveness Index (2019) [50] | Ease of doing business index (2020) | Property rights index (2015) | Bribe Payers Index (2011) | Current political status |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hong Kong | 5.28 | 44.86 | 76 | 83.1 | Very Easy (3rd) | 7.6 | 7.6 | Executive-led Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China |
Singapore | 6.22 | 47.88 | 85 | 84.8 | Very Easy (2nd) | 8.1 | 8.3 | Parliamentary Republic |
South Korea | 8.03 | 70.83 | 63 | 79.6 | Very Easy (5th) | 5.9 | 7.9 | Presidential Republic |
Taiwan | 8.99 | 75.54 | 68 | 80.2 | Very Easy (15th) | 6.9 | 7.5 | Semi-Presidential Republic |
Country or territory | UN | WTO | OECD | DAC | APEC | ADB | AIIB | SEACEN | G20 | EAS | ASEAN |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hong Kong | [51] | ||||||||||
Singapore | |||||||||||
South Korea | (APT) | ||||||||||
Taiwan | [b] |
The economy of Hong Kong is a highly developed free-market economy. It is characterised by low taxation, almost free port trade and a well-established international financial market. Its currency, called the Hong Kong dollar, is legally issued by three major international commercial banks, and is pegged to the US dollar. Interest rates are determined by the individual banks in Hong Kong to ensure that they are market driven. There is no officially recognised central banking system, although the Hong Kong Monetary Authority functions as a financial regulatory authority.
The economy of Macau is a highly developed market economy. Macau's economy has remained one of the most open in the world since its handover to China in 1999. Apparel exports and gambling-related tourism are mainstays of the economy. Since Macau has little arable land and few natural resources, it depends on mainland China for most of its food, fresh water, and energy imports. Japan and Hong Kong are the main suppliers of raw materials and capital goods. Although Macau was hit hard by the 1997–98 Asian financial crisis and the early 2000s recession, its economy grew approximately 13.1% annually on average between 2001 and 2006. Macau is a full Member of the World Trade Organization. Public security has greatly improved after handover to the People's Republic of China. With the tax revenue from the profitable gambling industry, the Macau government is able to introduce the social welfare program of 15 years of free education to all Macau citizens. In 2015, Macau's economy saw a sharp decrease due to the reduced spending by visitors from Mainland China since the Anti-corruption campaign under Xi Jinping.
The economy of Taiwan is a highly developed free-market economy. It is the 8th largest in Asia and 20th-largest in the world by purchasing power parity, allowing Taiwan to be included in the advanced economies group by the International Monetary Fund. Taiwan is notable for its rapid economic development from an agriculture-based society to an industrialised, high-income country. This economic growth has been described as the Taiwan Miracle. It is gauged in the high-income economies group by the World Bank. Taiwan is one of the most technologically advanced computer microchip and high-tech electronics industries makers in the world.
The economy of Vietnam is a developing mixed socialist-oriented market economy. It is the 33rd-largest economy in the world by nominal gross domestic product (GDP) and the 26th-largest economy in the world by purchasing power parity (PPP). It is a lower-middle income country with a low cost of living. Vietnam is a member of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations and the World Trade Organization.
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation is an inter-governmental forum for 21 member economies in the Pacific Rim that promotes free trade throughout the Asia-Pacific region. Following the success of ASEAN's series of post-ministerial conferences launched in the mid-1980s, APEC started in 1989, in response to the growing interdependence of Asia-Pacific economies and the advent of regional trade blocs in other parts of the world; it aimed to establish new markets for agricultural products and raw materials beyond Europe. Headquartered in Singapore, APEC is recognized as one of the highest-level multilateral blocs and oldest forums in the Asia-Pacific region, and exerts significant global influence.
The category of newly industrialized country (NIC), newly industrialized economy (NIE) or middle income country is a socioeconomic classification applied to several countries around the world by political scientists and economists. They represent a subset of developing countries whose economic growth is much higher than that of other developing countries; and where the social consequences of industrialization, such as urbanization, are reorganizing society.
The 1997 Asian financial crisis was a period of financial crisis that gripped much of East and Southeast Asia during the late 1990s. The crisis began in Thailand in July 1997 before spreading to several other countries with a ripple effect, raising fears of a worldwide economic meltdown due to financial contagion. However, the recovery in 1998–1999 was rapid, and worries of a meltdown quickly subsided.
The economy of Asia comprises about 4.7 billion people living in 50 different nations. Asia is the fastest growing economic region, as well as the largest continental economy by both GDP Nominal and PPP in the world. Moreover, Asia is the site of some of the world's longest modern economic booms.
A tiger economy is the economy of a country which undergoes rapid economic growth, usually accompanied by an increase in the standard of living. The term was originally used for the Four Asian Tigers as tigers are important in Asian symbolism, which also inspired the Tiger Cub Economies. The Asian Tigers also inspired other economies later on; the Anatolian Tigers in the 1980s, the Gulf Tiger (Dubai) in the 1990s, the Celtic Tiger in 1995–2000, the Baltic tigers in 2000–2007, and the Tatra Tiger (Slovakia) in 2002–2007.
Economic miracle is an informal economic term for a period of dramatic economic development that is entirely unexpected or unexpectedly strong. Economic miracles have occurred in the recent histories of a number of countries, often those undergoing an economic boom or described as a tiger economy.
Developmental state, or hard state, is a term used by international political economy scholars to refer to the phenomenon of state-led macroeconomic planning in East Asia in the late 20th century. In this model of capitalism, the state has more independent, or autonomous, political power, as well as more control over the economy. A developmental state is characterized by having strong state intervention, as well as extensive regulation and planning. The term has subsequently been used to describe countries outside East Asia that satisfy the criteria of a developmental state. The developmental state is sometimes contrasted with a predatory state or weak state.
The Taiwan Miracle or Taiwan Economic Miracle refers to Taiwan's rapid economic development to a developed, high-income country during the latter half of the twentieth century.
The Tiger Cub Economies collectively refer to the economies of the developing countries of Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam, the five dominant countries in Southeast Asia.
The economy of East Asia comprises 1.6 billion people living in six different countries and regions. The region includes several of the world's largest and most prosperous economies: Taiwan, Japan, South Korea, China, Hong Kong, and Macau. It is home to some of the most economically dynamic places in the world, being the site of some of the world's most extended modern economic booms, including the Taiwan miracle (1950–present) in Taiwan, Miracle on the Han River (1974–present) in South Korea, Japanese economic miracle (1950–1990) and the Chinese economic miracle (1983–2010) in China.
While beginning in the United States, the Great Recession spread to Asia rapidly and has affected much of the region.
The East Asian model, pioneered by Japan, is a plan for economic growth whereby the government invests in certain sectors of the economy in order to stimulate the growth of specific industries in the private sector. It generally refers to the model of development pursued in East Asian economies such as Japan, South Korea, Hong Kong and Taiwan. It has also been used by some to describe the contemporary economic system in Mainland China after Deng Xiaoping's economic reforms during the late 1970s and the current economic system of Vietnam after its Đổi Mới policy was implemented in 1986. Generally, as a country becomes more developed, the most common employment industry transitions from agriculture to manufacturing, and then to services.
Manufacturing in Hong Kong consists of mainly light and labour-intensive industries. Manufacturing started in the 19th century after the Taiping Rebellion and continues today, although it has largely been replaced by service industries, particularly those involving finance and real estate.
In development economics, the middle income trap is a situation where a country has developed until GDP per capita has reached a middle level of income, but the country does not develop further and it does not attain high income country status. The term was introduced by the World Bank in 2007 who defined it as the "middle-income range" countries with gross national product per capita that has remained between $1,000 to $12,000 at constant (2011) prices.
Since its formation in 1963, Malaysia's economic performance has been one of Asia's best. Real gross domestic product (GDP) grew by an average of 6.5% per year from 1957 to 2005. Performance peaked in the early 1980s through the mid-1990s, as the economy experienced sustained rapid growth averaging almost 8% annually. Malaysia's economy was greatly impacted by the 1997 Asian financial crisis, but recovered.