Chinese irredentism

Last updated
Evolution of Chinese territories throughout Chinese history. Territories of Dynasties in China.gif
Evolution of Chinese territories throughout Chinese history.

Chinese irredentism involves irredentist claims to the territories of former Chinese dynasties made by the Republic of China (ROC) [lower-alpha 1] and subsequently the People's Republic of China (PRC).

Contents

Background

Under various dynasties in the past, China acquired and lost territories that overlap with Burma, India, Korea, Mongolia, Russia, and Vietnam today. Some were tributary states. [1]

Modern era

During the 20th century, the Republic of China claimed that numerous neighboring countries and regions used to be parts of China. [1] [2] According to Sun Yat-sen, the reasons for their loss were unequal treaties, forceful occupation and annexation, and foreign interference. Chiang Kai-shek and Mao Zedong were supportive of these claims. [3]

In 1925, the Kuomintang issued a map that showed large areas outside China as belonging to China, including: large portions of Soviet central Asia, a portion of Ladakh, Nepal, Sikkim, Bhutan, Assam, Indochina, the Sulu Archipelago, Taiwan, the Ryukyus, the Philippines, Korea, and Sakhalin. A similar map was produced in 1954 by the Chinese Communist Party. [4]

With the rise of Xi Jinping and increasing territorial conflicts, it is generally believed that China continues to adhere to irredentist claims. [5] [6] A 2023 map by PRC's Ministry of Natural Resources showed a ten-dash line in the South China Sea and depicted territories in dispute with India and Russia as Chinese. Although these claims were not new, a host of countries voiced their objections. [7] [8] [lower-alpha 2]

Name Chinese characters Pinyin year of the cessionNote
Nepal [1] 尼泊尔Níbó'ěr1816Lost to the British Empire
Outer Manchuria (Left bank of the Amur River and East of the Ussuri River) [2] 外东北Wài dōngběi1858

1860

Lost to the Russian Empire
Sakhalin [2] 库页岛

萨哈林岛

Kù yè dǎo

Sà hā lín dǎo

1860Lost to the Russian Empire and Empire of Japan
Ryukyu Islands [2] 琉球群岛Liúqiú qúndǎo1879Lost to the Empire of Japan
Annam [2] 安南Ānnán1885Lost to French Empire
Burma [2] 缅甸Miǎndiàn1886Lost to the British Empire
Sikkim [2] 哲孟雄 / 锡金Zhé mèng xióng / Xíjīn1889Lost to the British Empire
Taiwan and Penghu [1] 台湾 (Taiwan)/

澎湖县 (Penghu)

Táiwān (Taiwan)/

Pēnghú xiàn (Penghu)

1895Lost to the Empire of Japan
South Tibet [2] (part of modern-day Arunachal Pradesh)藏南 (South Tibet)/阿鲁纳恰尔邦 (Arunachal Pradesh)Zàng nán (South Tibet)/Ā lǔ nà qià ěr bāng (Arunachal Pradesh)1914Lost to the British Empire
Joseon [2] 朝鲜Cháoxiǎn1895Lost to the Empire of Japan
Pamir Mountains/Ladakh area [2] 帕米尔Pàmǐ'ěr1895Lost to the Russian Empire and the British Empire
Sulu Archipelago [1] 苏禄群岛Sū lù qúndǎoLost to the Spanish Empire and French Empire
Java [1] 爪哇岛Zhǎowā dǎoLost to the Dutch Empire and French Empire

Bhutan

On June 29, 2017, Bhutan protested to China against the construction of a road in the disputed territory of Doklam. [9] On the same day, the Bhutanese border was put on high alert and border security was tightened as a result of the growing tensions. [10] In 2020, China claimed that the Sakteng Wildlife Sanctuary was also part of the territory in dispute. [11]

East China Sea

The PRC has frequently deployed ships since the 2010s to contest Japanese claim over the Senkaku Islands. [12] [13] [14]

India

Map of Arunachal Pradesh, part of which is claimed by China as South Tibet. India Arunachal Pradesh locator map.svg
Map of Arunachal Pradesh, part of which is claimed by China as South Tibet.

China maintains territorial disputes with India with regard to Aksai Chin and the McMahon Line. The Chinese government claims the Aksai Chin as part of Xinjiang and Tibet, while the government of India claims the territory as part of Ladakh. The 1914 Simla Convention, which the Chinese government does not recognize, negotiated the McMahon Line between India and Tibet. [15] Tensions between India and China have erupted several times, with the largest being the Sino-Indian War of 1962 in which China was victorious and gained control over Aksai Chin, and the 1967 conflict in which India won. [16] [17] The 2020 border clashes, which caused casualties for both sides, further strained Sino–Indian relations. [18]

China has reinforced its claim by publishing maps depicting South Tibet as Chinese territory. [19] China also pushed forward to reinforce its claim over Sikkim and Ladakh, and consolidating border control in Aksai Chin. [20] [21]

South China Sea

The Nine-dash line represents China's irredentist claims in the South China Sea. 9 dotted line.png
The Nine-dash line represents China's irredentist claims in the South China Sea.

Territorial claims of the People's Republic of China (PRC) and the Republic of China (ROC) in the South China Sea overlap with the claims of Vietnam, the Philippines, Brunei and Malaysia. [22] [23] In 2020, the PRC announced the establishment of Sansha City, which included the entirety of the Paracel Islands and Spratly Islands. [24]

Taiwan

The Republic of China (ROC) was established in mainland China in 1912 following the conclusion of the 1911 Revolution which led to the collapse of the Qing dynasty. The Chinese Civil War that broke out in 1927 was fought between the Kuomintang-led Nationalist government and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

Since the end of the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the de facto territories of the ROC are limited to the Taiwan Area which includes the island of Taiwan (ceded to the Empire of Japan in 1895 by the Qing dynasty of China; handover to the Republic of China in 1945) and several other islands. [25] [26] Meanwhile, the People's Republic of China (PRC), established in 1949 by the CCP, controls mainland China, Hong Kong and Macau. [25] Officially, both the ROC and the PRC claim de jure sovereignty over all of China (including Taiwan), and regard the other government as being in rebellion. [25] [27] [28]

Until 1971, the ROC was the representative of China at the United Nations (UN) and was a permanent member of the UN Security Council with veto power. [29] In 1971, the PRC replaced the ROC as the representative of China at the UN. [29]

Skepticism from Taiwanese toward the PRC has intensified as a result of growing Chinese nationalist threat to attack the island if an independent Taiwanese state was to be created. [30] Since the election of the independence-leaning Tsai Ing-wen, the PRC has conducted numerous military drills preparing for possible armed conflict with the ROC. [31] [32]

Tibet

Tibet came under the control of the Qing dynasty of China in 1720 [33] and remained under Qing suzerainty (or protectorate) until 1912. [34] The succeeding Republic of China claimed inheritance of all territories held by the Qing dynasty, including Tibet. [35] After the Xinhai Revolution in 1911, most of the area comprising the present-day Tibet Autonomous Region (TAR) became a de facto independent polity [36] [37] except for border regions such as Amdo and Eastern Kham. [38]

After defeating the Kuomintang in the Chinese Civil War, the People's Republic of China (PRC) gained control of Tibet through a series of events that involved negotiations with the Government of Tibet, a military conflict in the Chamdo area of western Kham in October 1950, and the Seventeen Point Agreement, which was ratified by the 14th Dalai Lama in October 1951 [39] but later repudiated. [40] [41] [42]

See also

Notes

  1. The Republic of China is based on the Chinese mainland before 1949, and on the island of Taiwan since 1949.
  2. Brunei, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, the Philippines, Taiwan, the United States, and Vietnam

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chinese unification</span> Potential union of mainland China and Taiwan

Chinese unification, also known as Cross-Strait unification or Chinese reunification, is the potential unification of territories currently controlled, or claimed, by the People's Republic of China and the Republic of China ("Taiwan") under one political entity, possibly the formation of a political union between the two republics. Together with full Taiwan independence, unification is one of the main proposals to address questions on the political status of Taiwan, which is a central focus of Cross-Strait relations.

The controversy surrounding the political status of Taiwan or the Taiwan issue is an ongoing dispute on the political status of Taiwan, currently controlled by the Republic of China (ROC). This dispute arose in the mid-twentieth century.

The term One China may refer, in alphabetical order, to one of the following:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aksai Chin</span> Region in Xinjiang, Tibet, and Kashmir administered by China

Aksai Chin is an arid region divided between India and China, mostly controlled by China as part of Hotan County, Hotan Prefecture, Xinjiang and partly in Rutog County, Ngari Prefecture, Tibet and constituting the easternmost portion of the larger Kashmir region that has been the subject of a dispute between India and China since 1959. It is claimed by India as part of its Leh District, Ladakh Union Territory.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">South China Sea Islands</span> Islands in the South China Sea

The South China Sea Islands consist of over 250 islands, atolls, cays, shoals, reefs and seamounts in the South China Sea. The islands are mostly low and small and have few inhabitants. The islands and surrounding seas are subject to overlapping territorial claims by the countries bordering the South China Sea.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">China–India relations</span> Bilateral relations

China and India have historically maintained peaceful relations for thousands of years of recorded history, but the harmony of their relationship has varied in modern times, after the Chinese Communist Party's victory in the Chinese Civil War in 1949, and especially post the Annexation of Tibet by the People's Republic of China. The two nations have sought economic cooperation with each other, while frequent border disputes and economic nationalism in both countries are major points of contention.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chinese expansionism</span> Aspect of Chinese history

Chinese expansionism is an expansionism that has been identified with different phases of territorial expansion in Chinese history.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Two Chinas</span> Geopolitical concept

The term "Two Chinas" refers to the geopolitical situation where two political entities exist under the name "China".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sino-Indian border dispute</span> Border dispute between China and India

The Sino–Indian border dispute is an ongoing territorial dispute over the sovereignty of two relatively large, and several smaller, separated pieces of territory between China and India. The first of the territories, Aksai Chin, is administered by China and claimed by India; it is mostly uninhabited high-altitude wasteland but with some significant pasture lands at the margins. It lies at the intersection of Kashmir, Tibet and Xinjiang, and is crossed by China's Xinjiang-Tibet Highway; the other disputed territory is south of the McMahon Line, in the area formerly known as the North-East Frontier Agency and now a state called Arunachal Pradesh. It is administered by India and claimed by China. The McMahon Line was signed between British India and Tibet to form part of the 1914 Simla Convention, but the latter was never ratified by China. China disowns the McMahon Line agreement, stating that Tibet was not independent when it signed the Simla Convention.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bhutan–China relations</span> Bilateral relations

The Kingdom of Bhutan and the People's Republic of China do not maintain official diplomatic relations, and relations are historically tense. The PRC shares a contiguous border of 470 kilometers with Bhutan, and its territorial disputes with Bhutan have been a source of potential conflict. Since 1984, the two governments have conducted regular talks on border and security issues to reduce tensions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">India–Taiwan relations</span> Bilateral relations

The bilateral relations between India and Taiwan have improved since the 1990s, despite both nations not maintaining official diplomatic relations. India recognises only the People's Republic of China and not the Republic of China's claims of being the legitimate government of Mainland China, Hong Kong, and Macau - a conflict that emerged after the Chinese Civil War (1945–49). However, India's economic and commercial links as well as people-to-people contacts with Taiwan have expanded in recent years.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Territorial changes of the People's Republic of China</span>

The territory of the People's Republic of China (PRC) has frequently been revised since its formation on 1 October 1949.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Disputed territories of India</span>

There are several disputed territories of India. A territorial dispute is a disagreement over the possession or control of land between two or more states or over the possession or control of land by a new state and occupying power after it has conquered the land from a former state no longer currently recognized by the new state.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nine-dash line</span> Contested Chinese map of South China Sea

The nine-dash line, also referred to as the eleven-dash line by Taiwan, is a set of line segments on various maps that accompanied the claims of the People's Republic of China and the Republic of China in the South China Sea. The contested area includes the Paracel Islands, the Spratly Islands, the Pratas Island and the Vereker Banks, the Macclesfield Bank, and the Scarborough Shoal. Certain places have undergone land reclamation by the PRC, ROC, and Vietnam. The People's Daily of the PRC uses the term Duànxùxiàn (断续线) or Nánhǎi Duànxùxiàn, while the ROC government uses the term Shíyīduàn xiàn.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tibet Area (administrative division)</span> Former province-level administrative division of China

The Tibet Area is a province-level administrative division of China since 1950. It was created after the invasion of Tibet by the Republic of China (1912–1949), and nominally includes the Ü-Tsang and Ngari areas, but not the Amdo and Kham areas. The territories were merely claimed by the ROC, but actually controlled by an independent Tibet with a government headed by the Dalai Lama in Lhasa. The ROC was defeated during the Chinese Civil War; it retreated to Taiwan and lost control of mainland China to the People's Republic of China (PRC) in 1949; afterwards, the ROC continued to claim Tibet.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bhutan–China border</span> International border

The Bhutan–China border is the international boundary between Bhutan and Tibet, China, running for 477 km (296 mi) through the Himalayas between the two tripoints with India.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Retreat of the government of Republic of China to Taiwan</span> Kuomintangs 1949 exodus to Taiwan

The retreat of the government of Republic of China to Taiwan, also known as the Kuomintang's retreat to Taiwan or the Great Retreat in Taiwan, refers to the exodus of the remnants of the then-internationally-recognized Kuomintang-ruled government of the Republic of China (ROC) to the island of Taiwan (Formosa) on December 7, 1949, after losing the Chinese Civil War in the Chinese mainland. The Kuomintang, its officers, and approximately 2 million ROC troops took part in the retreat, in addition to many civilians and refugees, fleeing the advance of the People's Liberation Army of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The CCP, who now effectively controlled most of Mainland China, spent the subsequent years purging any remnant Nationalist agents and bandits in western and southern China, solidifying the rule of the newly established People's Republic of China.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Territorial disputes of the People's Republic of China</span>

This article is about territorial disputes of the People's Republic of China (PRC). A territorial dispute is a disagreement over the possession or control of land between two or more political entities. Many of these territorial disputes are almost identical to those that the Republic of China (ROC) based in Taipei, also known as Taiwan, has with other countries. Therefore, many of the subsequent resolved disputes made by the PRC after 1949 with other governments may not be recognized by the ROC.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Tseng, Hui-Yi (2017). Revolution, State Succession, International Treaties and the Diaoyu/Diaoyutai Islands. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. p. 66. ISBN   9781443893688.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Kim, Samuel S. (1979). China, the United Nations, and World Order. Princeton University Press. p.  43. ISBN   9780691100760.
  3. Tzou, Byron N. (1990). China and International Law: The Boundary Disputes. Praeger. p. 77. ISBN   9780275934620.
  4. Cleland, John R. D. (1967). "Chinese Rimland Strategy". Military Review . XLVII (1): 4. Archived from the original on 2023-07-15. Retrieved 2023-07-15.
  5. "Irredentism and Chinese Foreign Policy with regard to East and South China Sea". www.ipsa.org. Archived from the original on 24 March 2021. Retrieved 6 September 2020.
  6. "Assertive China: Irredentism or Expansionism?". IISS.
  7. Lavery, Charles (2023-08-30). "China's new map claims swathes of neighboring territory". Newsweek. Archived from the original on 2023-09-05. Retrieved 2023-09-05.
  8. Bal Krishna Sah (2023-09-01). "China 2023 map leaves out new map of Nepal". The Himalayan Times. Archived from the original on 2023-09-05. Retrieved 2023-09-05.
  9. "Bhutan protests against China's road construction". The Straits Times. Jun 30, 2017. Archived from the original on 2017-07-29. Retrieved 2017-06-30.
  10. "Bhutan issues scathing statement against China, claims Beijing violated border agreements of 1988, 1998". Firstpost. Jun 30, 2017. Archived from the original on 2017-07-02. Retrieved 2017-06-30.
  11. "No Sanctuary: China's New Territorial Dispute with Bhutan". Foreign Policy Research Institute. July 29, 2020. Archived from the original on December 2, 2022. Retrieved August 23, 2020.
  12. "Japan's Effective Control of the Senkaku Islands | Research". Review of Island Studies. Archived from the original on 2021-09-28. Retrieved 2020-08-23.
  13. "Japan reports a record number of Chinese ships near contested Senkaku Islands". Stars and Stripes. Archived from the original on 2020-09-16. Retrieved 2020-08-23.
  14. Brad Lendon and Yoko Wakatsuki (6 July 2020). "Japan says Chinese ships spend record time violating its territorial waters". CNN. Archived from the original on 1 September 2020. Retrieved 27 August 2020.
  15. guruswamy, mohan. "China and Arunachal Pradesh: Time to Understand the History". The Citizen. Archived from the original on 2020-08-18. Retrieved 2020-08-23.
  16. "Sino Indian war of 1962 - Manifest IAS". 2 June 2020. Archived from the original on 24 September 2020. Retrieved 23 August 2020.
  17. "Remembering the war we forgot: 51 years ago, how India gave China a bloody nose". October 1, 2018. Archived from the original on August 18, 2020. Retrieved September 6, 2020.
  18. Lee, Marcelo Duhalde, Dennis Wong, Kaliz. "Why did an India-China border clash turn into a deadly scuffle?". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 2020-07-03. Retrieved 2020-08-27.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  19. "China includes parts of Arunachal Pradesh in its newly updated map". April 21, 2020. Archived from the original on October 6, 2020. Retrieved August 23, 2020.
  20. "Indian and Chinese troops clash in disputed Himalayan border region". the Guardian. Agence France-Presse. August 16, 2017. Archived from the original on August 21, 2020. Retrieved August 23, 2020.
  21. Shafiq, Nadeem (December 31, 2011). "India versus China: A review of the Aksai Chin border dispute". Journal of Political Studies via go.gale.com.
  22. Gao, Zhiguo; Jia, Bing Bing (January 23, 2013). "The Nine-Dash Line in the South China Sea: History, Status, and Implications". American Journal of International Law. 107 (1): 98–123. doi:10.5305/amerjintelaw.107.1.0098. S2CID   140885993. Archived from the original on July 18, 2020. Retrieved August 23, 2020 via Cambridge Core.
  23. "US rejects China's 'nine-dash line' in South China Sea". Nikkei Asian Review. Archived from the original on 2020-08-23. Retrieved 2020-08-23.
  24. "Sansha and the Expansion of China's South China Sea Administration". Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative. May 12, 2020. Archived from the original on August 6, 2020. Retrieved August 23, 2020.
  25. 1 2 3 Sarmento, Clara (2009). Eastwards / Westwards: Which Direction for Gender Studies in the 21st Century?. Cambridge Scholars. p. 127. ISBN   9781443808682. Archived from the original on 2022-05-31. Retrieved 2021-05-14.
  26. Henckaerts, Jean-Marie (1996). The International Status of Taiwan in the New World Order: Legal And Political Considerations. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. p. 117. ISBN   9789041109293.
  27. Hudson, Christopher (2014). The China Handbook. Routledge. p. 59. ISBN   9781134269662. Archived from the original on 2023-04-10. Retrieved 2021-05-14.
  28. Rigger, Shelley (2002). Politics in Taiwan: Voting for Reform. Routledge. p. 60. ISBN   9781134692972. Archived from the original on 2023-04-10. Retrieved 2021-05-14.
  29. 1 2 Froehlich, Annette; Seffinga, Vincent (2019). The United Nations and Space Security: Conflicting Mandates between UNCOPUOS and the CD. Springer. p. 40. ISBN   9783030060251. Archived from the original on 2024-03-18. Retrieved 2021-05-14.
  30. "The Real Reasons Behind Chinese Expansionism". July 25, 2017. Archived from the original on August 7, 2020. Retrieved August 23, 2020.
  31. "Chinese expansionism is a problem for democracy: Taiwanese foreign minister". www.efe.com. Archived from the original on 2021-07-16. Retrieved 2020-08-23.
  32. "Taiwan, next target of China's hegemonic expansion". August 6, 2020. Archived from the original on September 19, 2020. Retrieved August 23, 2020.
  33. Lin (2011). Tibet and Nationalist China's Frontier. pp. 7–8.
  34. Lin (2011), p. 9.
  35. Tanner, Harold (2009). China: A History. Hackett. p. 419. ISBN   978-0872209152.
  36. Shakya 1999 p.4
  37. Goldstein (1989). A History of Modern Tibet, Vol. 1. p.  815. Tibet unquestionably controlled its own internal and external affairs during the period from 1913 to 1951 and repeatedly attempted to secure recognition and validation of its de facto autonomy/independence.
  38. Shakya 1999 p.6,27. Feigon 1996 p.28
  39. A. Tom Grunfeld (30 July 1996). The Making of Modern Tibet. M.E. Sharpe. pp. 107–. ISBN   978-0-7656-3455-9.
  40. "The Dalai Lama's Press Statements - Statement issued at Tezpur" (PDF). 18 April 1959. Archived (PDF) from the original on 29 October 2022.
  41. Anne-Marie Blondeau; Katia Buffetrille (2008). Authenticating Tibet: Answers to China's 100 Questions. University of California Press. p. 61. ISBN   978-0-520-24464-1. Archived from the original on 23 June 2016. Retrieved 15 November 2015. It was evident that the Chinese were not prepared to accept any compromises and that the Tibetans were compelled, under the threat of immediate armed invasion, to sign the Chinese proposal.
  42. Tsepon Wangchuk Deden Shakabpa (October 2009). One Hundred Thousand Moons: An Advanced Political History of Tibet. BRILL. pp. 953, 955. ISBN   978-90-04-17732-1.