Atlanticism

Last updated
Poster by the U.S. government promoting the Marshall Plan (1950) Marshall Plan poster.JPG
Poster by the U.S. government promoting the Marshall Plan (1950)

Atlanticism, also known as Transatlanticism, [1] is the ideology which advocates a close alliance between nations in Northern America (the United States and Canada) and in Europe on political, economic, and defense issues. The term derives from the North Atlantic Ocean, which is bordered by North America and Europe.

Contents

The term can be used in a more specific way to refer to support for North Atlantic military alliances against the Soviet Union, [2] or in a more expansive way to imply broader cooperation, perceived deeply shared values, a merging of diplomatic cultures, [3] as well as a sense of community and some degree of integration between North America and Europe. In practice, the philosophy of Atlanticism encourages active North American, particularly American, engagement in Europe and close cooperation between states on both sides of the ocean. Atlanticism manifested itself most strongly during the Second World War and in its aftermath, the Cold War, through the establishment of various Euro-Atlantic institutions, most importantly NATO and the Marshall Plan, with the purpose being to maintain or increase the security and prosperity of the participating countries during the Cold War and protect liberal democracy and the progressive values of an open society that unite them under multiculturalism.

Atlanticism varies in strength from region to region and from country to country based on a variety of historical and cultural factors. It is often considered to be particularly strong in Eastern Europe, Central Europe, Ireland and the United Kingdom (linked to the Special Relationship). Politically, it has tended to be associated most heavily and enthusiastically but not exclusively with classical liberals or the political right in Europe. Atlanticism often implies an affinity for U.S. political or social culture, or affinity for Europe in North America, as well as the historical bonds between the two continents.

There is some tension between Atlanticism and continentalism on both sides of the Atlantic, with some people emphasising increased regional cooperation or integration over trans-Atlantic cooperation. [4] The relationship between Atlanticism and North American or European integrations is complex, and they are not seen in direct opposition to one another by many commentators. [5] Internationalism is the foreign policy belief combining both Atlanticism and continentalism. [5]

History

Ronald Reagan speaking in Berlin, 1987 ("Tear down this wall!") with Helmut Kohl, Chancellor of Germany. Reagan was a committed Atlanticist. President Ronald Reagan making his Berlin Wall speech.jpg
Ronald Reagan speaking in Berlin, 1987 ("Tear down this wall!") with Helmut Kohl, Chancellor of Germany. Reagan was a committed Atlanticist.

Prior to the World Wars, western European countries were generally preoccupied with continental concerns and creating colonial empires in Africa and Asia, and not relations with North America. Likewise, the United States was busy with domestic issues and interventions in Latin America, but had little interest in European affairs, and Canada, despite gaining self-governing dominion status through Confederation in 1867, had yet to exercise full foreign policy independence as a part of the British Empire.

Following World War I, New York lawyer Paul D. Cravath was a noted leader in establishing Atlanticism in the United States. Cravath had become devoted to international affairs during the war, and was later a co-founder and director of the Council on Foreign Relations. [6] In the aftermath of World War I, while the US Senate was discussing whether or not to ratify the Treaty of Versailles (it ultimately did not), some Congressional Republicans expressed their support for a legally binding US alliance with Britain and France as an alternative to the League of Nations's and especially Article X's open-ended commitments; however, US President Woodrow Wilson never seriously explored their offer, instead preferring to focus on his (ultimately unsuccessful) fight to secure US entry into the League of Nations. [7]

Paul D. Cravath, early Atlanticist Movement leader. Paul Drennan Cravath - PPA2 (cropped).jpg
Paul D. Cravath, early Atlanticist Movement leader.

The experience of having American and Canadian troops fighting with British, French, and other Europeans in Europe during the World Wars fundamentally changed this situation. Though the U.S. (and to some extent Canada) adopted a more isolationist position between the wars, by the time of the Normandy landings the Allies were well integrated on all policies. The Atlantic Charter of 1941 declared by U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt and British Prime Minister Winston Churchill established the goals of the Allies for the post-war world, and was later adopted by all the Western allies. Following the Second World War, the Western European countries were anxious to convince the U.S. to remain engaged in European affairs to deter any possible aggression by the Soviet Union. This led to the 1949 North Atlantic Treaty which established the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, the main institutional consequence of Atlanticism, which binds all members to defend the others, and led to the long-term garrisoning of American and Canadian troops in Western Europe.

President Reagan and Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher at Camp David 1986.jpg
U.S. President Ronald Reagan (right) and British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher in 1986
Clinton Blair.jpg
U.S. President Bill Clinton (left) greets British Prime Minister Tony Blair in 1999

After the end of the Cold War, the relationship between the United States and Europe changed fundamentally, and made the sides less interested in each other. Without the threat of the Soviet Union dominating Europe, the continent became much less of a military priority for the U.S., and likewise, Europe no longer felt as much need for military protection from the U.S. As a result, the relationship lost much of its strategic importance. [8]

However, the new democracies of the former Warsaw Pact, and parts of the fragments of the fractured Yugoslavia, took a different view, eagerly embracing Atlanticism, as a bulwark against their continued fear of the Soviet Union's key now-separate great power fragment: Russia. [9] [10]

Atlanticism has undergone significant changes in the 21st century in light of terrorism and the Iraq War, the net effect being a renewed questioning of the idea itself and a new insight that the security of the respective countries may require alliance action outside the North Atlantic territory. After the September 11, 2001, attacks, NATO for the first time invoked Article 5, [11] which states that any attack on a member state will be considered an attack against the entire group of members. Planes of NATO's multi-national AWACS unit patrolled the U.S. skies [12] and European countries deployed personnel and equipment. [13] However, the Iraq War caused fissures within NATO and the sharp difference of opinion between the U.S.-led backers of the invasion and opponents strained the alliance. Some commentators, such as Robert Kagan and Ivo Daalder questioned whether Europe and the United States had diverged to such a degree that their alliance was no longer relevant. [14] [15] Later, in 2018, Kagan said that "we actually need the United States to be working actively to support and strengthen Europe". [16]

The importance of NATO was reaffirmed during Barack Obama's administration, [17] though some called him relatively non-Atlanticist compared to predecessors. [18] As part of the Obama Doctrine, Washington supported multilateralism with allies in Europe. [19] Obama also enforced sanctions on Russia with European (and Pacific) allies after Russia's first invasion of Ukraine in Crimea. [20] After his presidency, Obama also stressed the Atlantic alliance's importance during the Trump administration, indirectly opposing Trump in the matter. [17]

During the Trump years, tensions rose within NATO, as a result of democratic backsliding in Hungary and Turkey, and Trump's comments against NATO members and the alliance. [21] Robert Kagan echoed common criticisms that Trump undermined the alliance. [16] Despite this, NATO gained two new member countries (Montenegro and North Macedonia) during that time. [22] The importance of NATO in Europe increased due to the continuing threat of the Russian military and intelligence apparatus and the uncertainty of Russian actions in former Soviet Union countries, [18] [21] and various threats in the Middle East. [21] German-Russian economic relations became an issue in the Atlantic relationship due to Nord Stream 2, [23] among other disagreements such as trade disputes between the United States and the European Union. [24]

As the Biden administration began, top officials of the European Union expressed optimism about the Atlantic relationship. [25] Following the February 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, journalists noted that the Russian aggression led to a united political response from the European Union, [26] [27] making the defensive relevance of the Atlantic alliance more widely known, and increasing the popularity of NATO accession in countries like Sweden and Finland. [28] [29] [30] Finland joined NATO on 4 April 2023 and Sweden on 7 March 2024. [31] [32]

Ideology

Atlanticism is a belief in the necessity of cooperation between North America and Europe. The term can imply a belief that the bilateral relationship between Europe and the United States is important above all others, including intra-European cooperation, especially when it comes to security issues. [33] The term can also be used "as a shorthand for the transatlantic security architecture." [33]

Supranational integration of the North Atlantic area had emerged as a focus of thinking among intellectuals on both sides of the Atlantic already in the late 19th century. [34] Although it was not known as Atlanticism at the time (the term was coined in 1950), they developed an approach coupling soft and hard power which would to some extent integrate the two sides of the Atlantic. The idea of an attractive "nucleus" union was the greatest soft power element; the empirical fact of the hegemonic global strength such a union would hold was the hard power element. This approach was eventually implemented to a certain degree in the form of NATO, the G7 grouping and other Atlanticist institutions.

In the long debate between Atlanticism and its critics in the 20th century, the main argument was whether deep and formal Atlantic integration would serve to attract those still outside to seek to join, as Atlanticists argued, or alienate the rest of the world and drive them into opposite alliances. [34] The Atlanticist perspective that informed the scheme of relations between the United States and the Western European countries after the end of World War Two was informed by political expedience and a strong civilizational bond. [35] Realists, neutralists, and pacifists, nationalists and internationalists tended to believe it would do the latter, citing the Warsaw Pact as the proof of their views and treating it as the inevitable realpolitik counterpart of NATO. [34]

Broadly speaking, Atlanticism is particularly strong in the United Kingdom [33] (linked to the Special Relationship) and eastern and central Europe (i.e. the area between Germany and Russia). [36] There are numerous reasons for its strength in Eastern Europe: primarily the role of the United States in bringing political freedom there after the First World War (Wilson's Fourteen Points), the major role of the U.S. during the Cold War (culminating in the geopolitical defeat of the Soviet empire and its withdrawal from the region), its relative enthusiasm for bringing the countries of the region into Atlanticist institutions such as NATO, and a suspicion of the intentions of the major Western European powers. [36] Some commentators see countries such as Poland and the United Kingdom among those who generally hold strong Atlanticist views, while seeing countries such as Germany and France tending to promote continental views and a strong European Union.[ weasel words ] [4] [5] [37]

In the early 21st century, Atlanticism has tended to be slightly stronger on the political right in Europe (although many variations do exist from country to country), but on the political center-left in the United States. The partisan division should not be overstated, but it exists and has grown since the end of the Cold War. [38]

While trans-Atlantic trade and political ties have remained mostly strong throughout the Cold War and beyond, the larger trend has been continentalist economic integration with the European Economic Area and the North American Free Trade Agreement notably dividing the Atlantic region into two rival trade blocs. However, many political actors and commentators do not see the two processes as being necessarily opposed to one another, [39] in fact some commentators believe regional integration can reinforce Atlanticism. [2] Article 2 of the North Atlantic Treaty, added by Canada, also attempted to bind the nations together on economic and political fronts. [40] [41]

Institutions

The North Atlantic Council is the premier, governmental forum for discussion and decision-making in an Atlanticist context. Other organizations that can be considered Atlanticist in origin: [34]

The World Bank and International Monetary Fund are also considered Atlanticist. Under a tacit agreement, the former is led by an American and the latter European. [42]

Prominent Atlanticists

Well-known Atlanticists include former U.S. Presidents Franklin D. Roosevelt, Harry Truman, and Ronald Reagan; U.K. Prime Ministers Winston Churchill, Margaret Thatcher, Tony Blair, and Gordon Brown; [43] former U.S. Secretary of State Dean Acheson; former Assistant Secretary of War and perennial presidential advisor John J. McCloy; former U.S. National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski; [44] former NATO Secretaries-General Javier Solana [45] and Joseph Luns; [46] and Council on Foreign Relations co-founder Paul D. Cravath. [6]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">NATO</span> Intergovernmental military alliance

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization, also called the North Atlantic Alliance, is an intergovernmental military alliance of 32 member states—30 European and 2 North American. Established in the aftermath of World War II, the organization implements the North Atlantic Treaty, signed in Washington, D.C., on 4 April 1949. NATO is a collective security system: its independent member states agree to defend each other against attacks by third parties. During the Cold War, NATO operated as a check on the threat posed by the Soviet Union. The alliance remained in place after the dissolution of the Soviet Union and the Warsaw Pact, and has been involved in military operations in the Balkans, the Middle East, South Asia, and Africa. The organization's motto is animus in consulendo liber. The organization's strategic concepts include deterrence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council</span> Multilateral forum of NATO states

The Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council (EAPC) is a post–Cold War, North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) institution. The EAPC is a multilateral forum created to improve relations between NATO and non-NATO countries in Europe and Central Asia. States meet to cooperate and discuss political and security issues. It was formed on 29 May 1997 at a Ministers’ meeting held in Sintra, Portugal, as the successor to the North Atlantic Cooperation Council (NACC), which was created in 1991.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Partnership for Peace</span> Intergovernmental organization

The Partnership for Peace is a North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) program aimed at creating trust and cooperation between the member states of NATO and other states mostly in Europe, including post-Soviet states; 18 states are members. The program contains 6 areas of cooperation, which aims to build relationships with partners through military-to-military cooperation on training, exercises, disaster planning and response, science and environmental issues, professionalization, policy planning, and relations with civilian government. During policy negotiations in the 1990s, a primary controversy regarding PfP was its ability to be interpreted as a program that is a stepping stone for joining NATO with full Article 5 guarantees.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Special Relationship</span> Relationship between the UK and the US

The Special Relationship is a term that is often used to describe the political, social, diplomatic, cultural, economic, legal, environmental, religious, military and historic relations between the United Kingdom and the United States or its political leaders. The term first came into popular usage after it was used in a 1946 speech by former British Prime Minister Winston Churchill. Both nations have been close allies during many conflicts in the 20th and the 21st centuries, including World War I, World War II, the Korean War, the Cold War, the Gulf War and the war on terror.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Transatlantic relations</span>

Transatlantic relations refer to the historic, cultural, political, economic and social relations between countries on both side of the Atlantic Ocean. Sometimes it specifically means relationships between the Anglophone North American countries, and particular European countries or organizations, although other meanings are possible.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">NATO Parliamentary Assembly</span> Consultative interparliamentary organisation

The NATO Parliamentary Assembly serves as the consultative interparliamentary organisation for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). It consists of delegates from the parliaments of the 32 NATO member countries as well as from associate and partner countries. Its current President is Gerry Connolly from the United States, elected as Acting President in 2024 after former president Michał Szczerba was elected to European Parliament. Its current Secretary General is Ruxandra Popa, who has been in this position since January 2020.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Major non-NATO ally</span> Special designation of the United States

A major non-NATO ally (MNNA) is a designation given by the United States government to countries that have strategic working relationships with the U.S. Armed Forces while not being members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). While the status does not automatically constitute a mutual defense pact with the United States, it does confer a variety of military and financial advantages that are otherwise unobtainable by non-NATO countries. There are currently 20 major non-NATO allies across four continents: 11 in Asia, 4 in Africa, 3 in South America, and 2 in Oceania.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European Union–United States relations</span> Bilateral relations

Relations between the European Union and the United States began in 1953, when US diplomats visited the European Coal and Steel Community in addition to the national governments of its six founding countries. The two parties share a good relationship which is strengthened by NATO, cooperation on trade, and shared values.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Russia–United States relations</span> Bilateral relations

The United States and Russia maintain one of the most important, critical, and strategic foreign relations in the world. Both nations have shared interests in nuclear safety and security, nonproliferation, counterterrorism, and space exploration. Due to the Russian invasion of Ukraine, relations became very tense after the United States imposed sanctions against Russia. Russia placed the United States on a list of "unfriendly countries".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Turkey–United States relations</span> Bilateral relations

The Republic of Türkiye and the United States of America established diplomatic relations in 1927. Relations after World War II evolved from the Second Cairo Conference in December 1943 and Turkey's entrance into World War II on the side of the Allies in February 1945. Later that year, Turkey became a charter member of the United Nations. Since 1945, both countries advanced ties under liberal international order, put forward by the US, through a set of global, rule-based, structured relationships based on political, and economic liberalism. As a consequence relationships advanced under G20, OECD, Council of Europe, OSCE, WTO, the Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council, IMF, the World Bank and the Turkey in NATO.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Denmark–United States relations</span> Bilateral relations

Diplomatic relations between Denmark and the United States of America began in 1783. Both countries are members of the Arctic Council, OECD, OSCE, NATO and the United Nations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Netherlands–United States relations</span> Bilateral relations

Diplomatic relations between the Netherlands and the United States started in 1776 with the first salute at St. Eustatius's Fort Oranje and continues to this day as one of the oldest continual bilateral alliances in the western world. Today they are described as "excellent" by the United States Department of State and "close" by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands. Founding members of the North Atlantic Alliance and allies since John Adams's visit to the Netherlands in 1782, it is considered one of the strongest military and economic alliances in contemporary history.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Enlargement of NATO</span> Collective geopolitical action by NATO states

NATO is a military alliance of thirty-two European and North American countries that constitutes a system of collective defense. The process of joining the alliance is governed by Article 10 of the North Atlantic Treaty, which allows for the invitation of "other European States" only and by subsequent agreements. Countries wishing to join must meet certain requirements and complete a multi-step process involving political dialogue and military integration. The accession process is overseen by the North Atlantic Council, NATO's governing body. NATO was formed in 1949 with twelve founding members and has added new members ten times. The first additions were Greece and Turkey in 1952. In May 1955, West Germany joined NATO, which was one of the conditions agreed to as part of the end of the country's occupation by France, the United Kingdom, and the United States, prompting the Soviet Union to form its own collective security alliance later that month. Following the end of the Franco regime, newly democratic Spain chose to join NATO in 1982.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Russia–NATO relations</span> Bilateral relations

Relations between the NATO military alliance and the Russian Federation were established in 1991 within the framework of the North Atlantic Cooperation Council. In 1994, Russia joined the Partnership for Peace program, and on 27 May 1997, the NATO–Russia Founding Act (NRFA) was signed at the 1997 Paris NATO Summit in France, enabling the creation of the NATO–Russia Permanent Joint Council (NRPJC). Through the early part of 2010s NATO and Russia signed several additional agreements on cooperation. The NRPJC was replaced in 2002 by the NATO-Russia Council (NRC), which was established in an effort to partner on security issues and joint projects together.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Albania–NATO relations</span> Bilateral relations

The accession of Albania to NATO took place in 2009. Albania's relationship with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) began in 1992 when it joined the North Atlantic Cooperation Council. In 1994, it entered NATO's Partnership for Peace, which began Albania's process of accession into the alliance. In 1999, the country received a Membership Action Plan (MAP). The country received an invitation to join at the 2008 Bucharest Summit and became a full member on April 1, 2009.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Canada–Europe relations</span> Bilateral relations

Canada has many diplomatic, economic, and cultural ties to the peoples and states of the European continent.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Foreign relations of NATO</span> Overview of multilateral relations

NATO maintains foreign relations with many non-member countries across the globe. NATO runs a number of programs which provide a framework for the partnerships between itself and these non-member nations, typically based on that country's location. These include the Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council and the Partnership for Peace.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">A. Wess Mitchell</span> American foreign policy expert and diplomat (born 1977)

Aaron Wess Mitchell is an American foreign policy expert and former diplomat who was the Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs from October 2017 until February 2019. Prior to assuming the role at State Department, he was president and CEO of the Center for European Policy Analysis. On July 19, 2017, President Donald Trump nominated Mitchell as Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of the Common Security and Defence Policy</span> Aspect in of history

This article outlines the history of the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) of the European Union (EU), a part of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European Union–NATO relations</span> Bilateral relations

The European Union (EU) and the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) are two main treaty-based Western organisations for cooperation between member states, both headquartered in Brussels, Belgium. Their natures are different and they operate in different spheres: NATO is a purely intergovernmental organisation functioning as a military alliance, which serves to implement article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty on collective territorial defence. The EU on the other hand is a partly supranational and partly intergovernmental sui generis entity akin to a confederation that entails wider economic and political integration. Unlike NATO, the EU pursues a foreign policy in its own right—based on consensus, and member states have equipped it with tools in the field of defence and crisis management; the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) structure.

References

  1. ↑ Klinke, Ian (May 1, 2018). "Geopolitics and the political right: lessons from Germany". International Affairs. 94 (3): 495–514. doi:10.1093/ia/iiy024.
  2. 1 2 Croci, Osvaldo (December 2008). "Not a Zero-Sum Game: Atlanticism and Europeanism in Italian Foreign Policy". The International Spectator: Italian Journal of International Affairs. 43 (4): 137–155. doi:10.1080/03932720802486498. S2CID   155056439.
  3. ↑ Weisbrode, Kenneth. The Atlanticists.'' Nortia Press, 2017.
  4. 1 2 Mouritzen, Hans (16 May 2007). "Denmark's Super Atlanticism". Nordic International Studies Association. Retrieved 24 June 2015.[ permanent dead link ]
  5. 1 2 3 Kořan, Michal, ed. (2010). Czech Foreign Policy in 2007-2009: Analysis. Ústav mezinárodních vztahů, v. v. i. p. 373. ISBN   978-8086506906 . Retrieved 24 June 2015.
  6. 1 2 "Paul D. Cravath, the First World War, and the Anglophile Internationalist Tradition", by Priscilla Roberts, Australian Journal of Politics and History, 2005 51(2), pages 194-215. ISSN   0004-9522. Retrieved December 1, 2021.
  7. ↑ Ambrosius, Lloyd E. (1972). "Wilson, the Republicans, and French Security after World War I". The Journal of American History. 59 (2): 341–352. doi:10.2307/1890194. JSTOR   1890194.
  8. ↑ Daalder, Ivo (2003). "The End of Atlanticism" (PDF). Survival. 45 (2): 147–166. doi:10.1080/00396330312331343536. S2CID   154201721. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 October 2013. Retrieved 9 July 2013.
  9. ↑ Asmus, Ronald D. and Alexandr Vondra: "The Origins of Atlanticism in Central and Eastern Europe," July, 2005 Cambridge Review of International Affairs Volume 18, Number 2, Centre of International Studies, ISSN 0955-7571 print / ISSN 1474-449X, retrieved June 8, 2020 from Pittsburg State University.
  10. ↑ Schmitz-Robinson, Elizabeth: "Kindred Spirit or Opportunistic Ally? Polish Atlanticism in the 21st Century,", Claremont-UC Undergraduate Research Conference on the European Union (2009) : Vol. 2009, Article 12. DOI: 10.5642/urceu.200901.
  11. ↑ North Atlantic Council. "Statement by the North Atlantic Council," 2001-10-12. Retrieved on 2007-10-13
  12. ↑ Schmitt, Eric. "NATO Planes to End Patrol of U.S. Skies," New York Times, 2002-05-02. Retrieved on 2007-10-13.
  13. ↑ NATO, "Statement to the Press, by NATO Secretary General, Lord Robertson," 2001-10-04. Retrieved on 2007-10-13
  14. ↑ Kagan, Robert (2003). Of Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
  15. ↑ Daalder, Ivo H.: "The End of Atlanticism," June 1, 2003, Brookings Institution, retrieved June 8, 2020
  16. 1 2 Reinert, Ted (2018-07-20). ""To destroy the liberal world order": Trump, Putin, and the imperiled trans-Atlantic alliance". Brookings. Retrieved 2021-03-06.
  17. 1 2 Horsley, Scott (25 May 2017). "As Trump Slams NATO Allies, Obama Defends 'International Order'". NPR.org. Retrieved 2021-02-09.
  18. 1 2 "NATO's 'Obama problem'". POLITICO. 2015-12-10. Retrieved 2021-02-09.
  19. ↑ Good, Chris (2009-12-10). "The Obama Doctrine: Multilateralism With Teeth". The Atlantic. Retrieved 2021-02-09.
  20. ↑ "Obama urges Russia to show 'respect'". BBC News. Retrieved 2021-02-09.
  21. 1 2 3 Kirchick, Norman Eisen and James (2018-07-14). "Yes, Russia is a threat to NATO. So are the alliance's anti-democratic members". Brookings. Retrieved 2021-02-09.
  22. ↑ Emmott, Robin (2019-02-06). "Macedonia signs accord to join NATO despite Russian misgivings". Reuters. Retrieved 2021-02-09.
  23. ↑ Ellyatt, Holly (2020-06-29). "America's relationship with Germany may never be the same again, Berlin warns". CNBC. Retrieved 2021-02-09.
  24. ↑ "EU keeps its shield up in the US trade war". POLITICO. 2020-11-10. Retrieved 2021-02-09.
  25. ↑ "EU sighs with relief as Biden readies to enter White House". AP NEWS. 2021-01-20. Retrieved 2021-02-09.
  26. ↑ Langfitt, Frank (2022-03-24). "Russia's invasion of Ukraine transforms Europe's political and military landscape". NPR. Retrieved 2022-05-14.
  27. ↑ Lopez, German (2022-03-13). "Europe Awakens". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2022-05-14.
  28. ↑ "Ukraine conflict: What is Nato and how could Finland and Sweden join?". BBC News. 2022-05-12. Retrieved 2022-05-14.
  29. ↑ "NATO Expansion Could Finally Shore Up Alliance's Weakest Flank". Bloomberg.com. 2022-05-14. Retrieved 2022-05-14.
  30. ↑ "Timeline of NATO expansion since 1949". AP NEWS. 2022-05-10. Retrieved 2022-05-14.
  31. ↑ Kauranen, Anne; Gray, Andrew (2023-04-04). "Finland joins NATO in historic shift, Russia threatens 'counter-measures'". Reuters. Retrieved 2023-04-12.
  32. ↑ Matthew, Lee; Cook, Lorne (2024-03-07). "Sweden officially joins NATO, ending decades of post-World War II neutrality". The Assosciated Press. Retrieved 2023-03-14.
  33. 1 2 3 Dunne, Tim (2004). "'When the shooting starts': Atlanticism in British security strategy". International Affairs. 80 (5): 895. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2004.00424.x.
  34. 1 2 3 4 Straus, Ira (June 2005). "Atlanticism as the core 20th century U.S. strategy for internationalism" (PDF). Streit Council. Annual Meeting of the Society of Historians of American Foreign Relations. Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 October 2013. Retrieved 10 July 2013.
  35. ↑ Lewkowicz, Nicolas (2018). The United States, the Soviet Union and the Geopolitical Implications of the Origins of the Cold War. New York: Anthem Press. p. 63. ISBN   9781783087990.
  36. 1 2 Asmus, Ronald; Alexandr Vondra (July 2005). "The Origins of Atlanticism in Central and Eastern Europe". Cambridge Review of International Affairs. 18 (2): 203–216. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.393.1224 . doi:10.1080/09557570500164439. S2CID   154888987.
  37. ↑ "The new kids on the block," The Economist, 2007-01-04. Retrieved 2007-10-14. Quote: "Romania, under its president, Traian Basescu, is a bastion of Atlanticism in the Balkan and Black Sea regions."
  38. ↑ Asmus, Ronald; Phillip Everts; Pierangelo Isernia (2004). "Across the Atlantic and Political Aisle: The Double Divide in U.S. - European Relations" (PDF). German Marshall Fund. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-07-03. Retrieved 17 July 2013.
  39. ↑ "The Atlanticist delusion". The Economist. 18 May 2013. Retrieved 9 July 2013.
  40. ↑ NATO. "Canada and NATO - 1949". NATO. Retrieved 2023-07-08.
  41. ↑ NATO. "The North Atlantic Treaty". NATO. Retrieved 2023-07-08.
  42. ↑ Keating, Joshua E. "Why Is the IMF Chief Always a European?". Foreign Policy. Retrieved 2021-12-29.
  43. ↑ Settle, Michael (30 July 2007). "'Atlanticist' Brown vows to strengthen special bond with US". Herald Scotland. Retrieved 10 July 2013.
  44. ↑ "Zbigniew Brzezinski". Atlantic Council. Archived from the original on 13 May 2013. Retrieved 10 July 2013.
  45. ↑ Gros-Verheyde, Nicolas (19 March 2009). "A diplomat, Socialist, Atlanticist and European". Europolitics. Archived from the original on 10 July 2013. Retrieved 10 July 2013.
  46. ↑ Schoenmaker, Ben (2004-01-01). "C. Kristel, Met alle geweld. Botsingen en tegenstellingen in burgerlijk Nederland". BMGN - Low Countries Historical Review. 119 (3): 382–383. doi: 10.18352/bmgn-lchr.6087 . ISSN   2211-2898.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.