Pan-Indianism

Last updated

Pan-Indianism is a philosophical and political approach promoting unity, and to some extent cultural homogenization, among different Indigenous groups in the Americas regardless of tribal distinctions and cultural differences. [1]

Contents

This approach to political organizing is primarily associated with Native Americans organizing for social justice and cultural revitalization in the Continental United States, but has spread to some other Indigenous communities as well, especially in Canada. Inuit and Métis people may consider themselves part of the broader, pan-Aboriginal community, or some variation thereof. [2] Some academics have also used the term pan-Amerindianism to distinguish from other peoples known as "Indians". [3] Some pan-Indian organizations seek to pool the resources of Native groups in order to protect the interests of indigenous peoples across the world. [4]

Early history

Tecumseh's Confederacy is considered to be an early example of Pan-Indianism. [5] As a confederation founded on the premise of indigenous unity against American expansionism, it united many of the tribes of the Great lakes region. At the meeting between Tecumseh and then governor of the Indiana territory, William Henry Harrison at Vincennes, Tecumseh called for collective ownership of land, arguing that the land belonged to everyone.

In 1912 members of the Creek, Choctaw, Cherokee, and Chickasaw tribes, united by their opposition to Allotment, formed the Four Mothers Society for collective political action. Also in 1912, the Alaskan Native Brotherhood and Sisterhood came together, centering on their shared interest of the protection of Native resources. [4] In 1934, Congress passed the Indian Reorganization Act, which reversed assimilation and allotment policies. [4] This act granted "legal sanction to tribal landholdings; returned unsold allotted lands to tribes; made provisions for the purchase of new lands; encouraged tribal constitutions, systems of justice, and business corporations; expanded educational opportunities through new facilities and loans ...; advocated the hiring of Indians by the Office of Indian Affairs ...; extended the Indian Trust Status; and granted Indians Religious Freedom." [4]

Key events

Before there were successful national and continental organizations, there were several regional bodies which united multiple nations (tribes or bands) within the context of post-settlement politics. The Grand General Indian Council of Ontario was organized with missionary assistance in the 1870s and persisted until 1938. Likewise, the Allied Tribes of British Columbia were created in 1916. [6]

In 1911, the first national Indian political organization in the US was created, the Society of American Indians. This organization pursued such things as better Indian educational programs and improved living conditions. [7] This was paralleled by the establishment of League of Indians of Canada in 1919, Canada's first Aboriginal organization that was national in scope. [8]

The Society of American Indians was the most influential of the early pan-Indian organizations. It played a critical role in advocating Indian citizenship, which was finally granted by the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924. [4]

Before World War II and throughout the 1940s and '50s, Native activism was less developed and for the most part nonviolent. Many leaders made a genuine effort to work with the American government. In 1922, as a symbolic gesture, Deskaheh, a Cayuga chief, traveled to the League of Nations in Geneva in hopes of obtaining recognition of his tribe's sovereignty but his request was denied. In 1939, the Tonowanda Band of the Seneca tribe issued a "Declaration of Independence" to the state of New York. It was ignored and natives who broke state law were arrested. In other cases, American Indian tribes struggled to maintain their sovereignty over tribal land that had been granted to them by treaties with the federal government. Unrelated Native American groups, and Americans in general, began to notice and sympathize with their aims.[ citation needed ]

For one week in June 1961, 420 American Indians from 67 tribes convened for the American Indian Chicago Conference held at the University of Chicago. [9] :13 After exchanging opinions that covered many aspects of Indian affairs, the Declaration of Indian Purpose was drafted. [10]

In 1989, the Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, also known as the International Labour Organization's (ILO) Convention No. 169, occurred. To date, this has been the only formally binding international convention that specifically applies to indigenous peoples. The conference recognized the goal of native groups to maintain their position as entities independent of national governments. [11]

Organizations

Alaska Native Brotherhood/Sisterhood

The Alaska Native Brotherhood and Sisterhood was founded in 1912 with a goal of protecting Native resources. [4]

All Indian Pueblo Council

The All Indian Pueblo Council, founded in 1922, successfully opposed the proposed Bursum Bill, which legislated rights for squatters on Native grounds along the Rio Grande. [4] The All Indian Pueblo Council declared that Pueblo Indians had been living in a "civilized condition" long before European Americans came over to America. They appealed to public morality by claiming to have pride in their past. The All Pueblo Council needed public support to help preserve lands, customs, and traditions; and to turn interest to the Pueblo tribes so they can gain assistance in court. [12]

American Indian Movement

Flag of the American Indian Movement Flag of the American Indian Movement.svg
Flag of the American Indian Movement

The American Indian Movement was created in 1968 in Minneapolis by Dennis Banks, George Mitchell, and Clyde Bellecourt (all Ojibwe), and Russell Means (Lakota). [4] AIM became well known for their involvement in the Wounded Knee incident in 1973, and the seizure of the Bureau of Indian Affairs in 1972. [4] Inspired by groups like The Black Panthers, AIM took a new, more radical, approach than had previous Native groups, using direct action at protests, [13] :19 and arguing for liberation instead of assimilation. They advocated for the abolition of the Office of Indian Affairs (which was promoting assimilation). They mobilized many people to become activists and quickly became the most visible of the pan-Indian organizations of the era. [4]

Assembly of First Nations

Founded in 1967, the Assembly of First Nations (AFN), formerly known as the National Indian Brotherhood, is a representative body of First Nations leaders in Canada. The aims of the organization are to protect the rights, treaty obligations, ceremonies, and claims of citizens of the First Nations in Canada. [14] It represents the majority of all First Nations governments or "band councils" in Canada, and has a leader knows as the National Chief.

Association on American Indian Affairs

The Association on American Indian Affairs, also known as AAIA, has a mission to improve Native American health, education, and economic and community development, while maintaining tradition, culture, and language. Protecting Native American sovereignty, natural resources, and constitutional, legal, and human rights is also included in their mission. [15]

Black Hills Treaty Council

The Black Hills Treaty Council was established in the South Dakota in 1911 on the Cheyenne River Sioux reservation to prepare a suit in the U.S. Court of Claims. [12]

Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission

The Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission, also known as CRITFC, was created in 1977 by four tribes the Nez Perce, Umatilla, Warm Springs, and Yakama, to "renew their authority in fisheries management." [16] Their mission also includes protecting treaty rights for fishing guaranteed by treaties with the federal government "through the exercise of the inherent sovereign powers of the tribes.". [16]

"For generations, traditional fishing authorities governed tribal communities on the Columbia River. One such authority was the old "Celilo Fish Committee." The authority exercised by the Celilo Fish Committee was derived from the sovereign powers of the people living and fishing in nearby tribal territories. The committee ordained fishing practices that were disciplined and designed to serve a high purpose: to ensure that the salmon resource was served first—even worshipped—so that it would flourish and always exist." [16]

Congress of Aboriginal Peoples

The Congress of Aboriginal Peoples] (CAP) founded in 1971 as the Native Council of Canada, is a Canadian aboriginal organization, that represents Aboriginal Peoples (First Nations and Métis) who live off Indian reserves, either in urban and rural areas across Canada. [17]

Each CAP affiliate has its own constitution and is separately funded under the federal Aboriginal Representative Organization Program (AROP). CAP's bylaws require affiliation be limited to one organization per province or territory. In effect, these affiliates are the corporate members of CAP, which does not, itself, have individual memberships. [17]

Indian Defense League of America

The Indian Defense League of America was founded in 1926 by Chief Clinton Rickard of the Tuscarora "to promote unrestricted travel across the international border between the United States and Canada." [4] Indigenous people consider unrestricted travel across the continental United States and across the border between the United States and Canada an inherent right given by the Jay Treaty of 1794 and reconfirmed by the Treaty of Ghent of 1814. [18] The Annual Border Crossing sponsored by the League begins at Niagara Falls. [19]

International Indian Treaty Council

The International Indian Treaty Council, also known as IITC, has an objective to seek, promote and build participation of Indigenous Peoples in the United Nations (UN) and its specialized agencies, as well as other international forums.

[20]

Inter-Tribal Environmental Council

The ITEC was set up in 1992 to protect the health of Native Americans, their natural resources and environment. To accomplish this ITEC provides technical support, training and environmental services in a variety of disciplines. Currently, there are over forty ITEC member tribes in Oklahoma, New Mexico, and Texas. [21]

The ITEC office has a full-time staff of twenty-two who organize and provide services to the individual ITEC member tribes. In addition, they assist individual tribes with other environmentally related issues and concerns as they arise.

Leonard Peltier Defense Committee

Political graffiti in Los Angeles demanding "Lets Free Leonard Peltier & All Political Prisoners". Leonard Peltier Graffiti.jpg
Political graffiti in Los Angeles demanding "Lets Free Leonard Peltier & All Political Prisoners".

The LPDC is a national and international support group working to free Leonard Peltier (Anishinabe and Dakota/Lakota), a man who is serving two life sentences at the Leavenworth Federal Penitentiary in Kansas. [22] He was convicted to prison for the deaths of two FBI agents in 1975. There is much controversy surrounding the circumstances of the deaths and of Peltier's conviction. Leonard's status is more well-known overseas, and is considered by some to be a "political prisoner" who was targeted by the FBI during the U.S. government's efforts to curb the activities of AIM and other organizations during the 1970s. [22]

A 'Free Leonard Peltier' sign in Detroit Michigan.(March 2009) FreeLeonardPeltierSign.jpg
A 'Free Leonard Peltier' sign in Detroit Michigan.(March 2009)

National Indigenous Congress

The National Indigenous Congress (Congreso Nacional Indígena, CNI) is an organization of communities, nations, towns, neighbourhoods and indigenous tribes of Mexico. In its own words, the CNI is "... a space of unity, reflection and organization of the indigenous peoples of Mexico, promoting the integral reconstitution of the original peoples and the construction of a society in which all cultures, all the colors, all the towns that we are Mexico". [23] Since its foundation, among several activities, five national congresses have been held.

Native American Journalists Association

The Native American Journalists Association, also known as NAJA, is committed to educate its members about culture and tradition. It works to ensure free press, speech and religion, and promote Native culture. [24]

Native American Rights Fund

The Native American Rights Fund, also known as NARF, is a non-profit organization that uses existing laws and treaties to ensure that state governments and the national government live up to their legal obligations. NARF also "provides legal representation and technical assistance to Indian tribes, organizations and individuals nationwide." [25] "NARF is governed by a volunteer board of directors composed of thirteen Native Americans from different tribes throughout the country with a variety of expertise in Indian matters. A staff of fifteen attorneys handles about fifty major cases at any given time, with most of the cases taking several years to resolve. Cases are accepted on the basis of their breadth and potential importance in setting precedents and establishing important principles of Indian law". [25]

In September 2001 tribal Leaders met in Washington, D.C., and established the Tribal Supreme Court Project in an effort to "strengthen tribal advocacy before the U.S. Supreme Court by developing new litigation strategies and coordinating tribal legal resources." [26] The ultimate goal is to improve the win–loss record of Indian tribes in Supreme Court cases. The Project is staffed by attorneys from Native American Rights Fund (NARF) and the National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) and consists of a Working Group of over 200 attorneys and academics from around the nation who specialize in Indian law and other areas of law that impact Indian cases, including property law, trust law and Supreme Court practice. In addition, an advisory board of tribal leaders assists the project by providing the necessary political and tribal perspective to the legal and academic expertise.

The Tribal Supreme Court does the following:

❖ In conjunction with the National Indian Law Library, monitors Indian law cases in the state and federal appellate courts that have the potential to reach the Supreme Court (NILL Indian Law Bulletins)

❖ Maintains an on-line depository of briefs and opinions in all Indian law cases filed with the U.S. Supreme Court and cases being monitored in the U.S. Court of Appeal and State Supreme Courts (Court Documents)

❖ Prepares an Update Memorandum of Cases which provides an overview of Indian law cases pending before the U.S. Supreme Court, cases being monitored and the current work being performed by the Project

❖ Offers assistance to tribal leaders and their attorneys to determine whether to file a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court in cases where they lost in the court below

❖ Offers assistance to attorneys representing Indian tribes to prepare their Brief in Opposition at the Petition Stage in cases where they won in the court below

❖ Coordinates an Amicus Brief writing network and helps to develop litigation strategies at both the Petition Stage and the Merits Stage to ensure that the briefs receive the maximum attention of the Justices

❖ When appropriate, prepares and submits Amicus Briefs on behalf of Indian tribes and Tribal Organizations

❖ Provides other brief writing assistance, including reviewing and editing of the principal briefs, and the performance of additional legal research

❖ Coordinates and conducts Moot Court and Roundtable opportunities for attorneys who are presenting Oral Arguments before the Court

❖ Conducts conference calls and fosters panel discussions among attorneys nationwide about pending Indian law cases and, when necessary, forms small working groups to formulate strategy on specific issues [26]

National Congress of American Indians

The NCAI was founded in 1944 at a gathering of over 100 Native Americans in Denver, Colorado (many of the participants were elected leaders of the tribes that were involved in the Indian Reorganization Acts of 1934). [27] The formation of the NCAI was encouraged by John Collier (reformer), who realized that the United States Congress and the people were becoming more focused on World War II and less attention was focused on Native American affairs. [27] The NCAI decided to dedicate themselves to lobbying for or against specific legislation and also to focusing on civil and voting rights.

National Indian Education Association

The National Indian Education Association, also known as NIEA, is a membership based organization "committed to increasing educational opportunities and resources for American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian students while protecting our cultural and linguistic traditions." [28]

NIEA came into being in 1970. It "is the largest and oldest Indian education organization in the nation and strives to keep Indian Country moving toward educational equity. Governed by a Board of Directors made up of twelve representatives, the NIEA has several committees that work to ensure native educators and students are represented in various educational institutions and forums throughout Indian Country and Washington, D.C." [28]

National Indian Youth Council

The NIYC was founded by Clyde Warrior (Ponca), and Melvin Thom, (Paiute). Their work resulted in an action program and a newspaper called ABC: Americans Before Columbus. What seems particularly interesting about the NIYC is the approaches that they took and still take today towards achieving their goals. For instance, they held "fish-ins" along the rivers in Washington in order to protest the treaty-given fishing rights that were being taken away from them. This was due to a nullified supreme court decision. These incidents are not unlike the number of sit-ins held by young African-Americans during the civil rights movement, in protest of equal rights not being granted to them. [4]

Society of American Indians

This organization was founded by the Yavapi Indian Carlos Montezuma. The SAI was at the forefront in the fight for Indian citizenship, which was eventually granted in 1924. Their efforts resulted in a number of fish-ins along rivers to support aboriginal fishing rights nullified by a state supreme court decision. This is very comparable to the sit-ins that were held during the civil rights movement when young African American students held sit-ins at lunch counters. When thinking of this comparison, it allows you to think of the immense efforts that American Indians have already put forth and are still putting forth to gain their civil rights. [4]

Early activism

The first major recorded action of American Indian activism happened in 1901. A Muskogee creek named Chitto Harjo led a rebellion (also known as the Crazy Snake Uprising) against Allotment in Indian Territory. He and his followers harassed non-natives as well as natives in favor of Allotment. Although this rebellion ended in the arrest of Harjo and his anti-allotment followers (including some Cherokee), the Four Mothers Society for collective political action was formed in 1912. This committee took a more formal approach by sending delegates to congress to argue their cause against Allotment. [29]

Creation of the Office of Economic Opportunity

The OEO was founded in 1964 as a result of Indian support of Point Four Program, similar to President Truman's Point IV program but adapted to LBJ's War on Poverty. OEO created a "symbiotic relationship" with NCAI and Indian Division, making an anti BIA. One goal of the OEO was to help Native Americans gain skills and experience that would enable them to move up the bureaucratic ladder, control the OEO programs, become the managers of the OEO programs, decide where the money made by the tribe will go, what programs to make, and get Native land back. [30] :127 Some OEO programs that benefit Native Americans are the Job Corps, Neighborhood Youth Corps, Operation Headstart, VISTA, Legal Services and the Community Action Programs. [31] The Community Action Programs give tribes "the opportunity to develop and administer their own economic and social programs." [31] The OEO also "channel[ed] federal funding directly to tribal governments". [30] Tribal governments submit plans for local projects to the Office of Economic Opportunity. Once the members of the tribe approved the plan, "the OEO contracted with the tribal government to operate the project", and provided the necessary, budgeted funds. [32]

Red Power movement

A lingering sign of the 1969-71 Native American occupation of Alcatraz Island (2010 Photograph).. Alcatraz Island - panoramio (3).jpg
A lingering sign of the 1969–71 Native American occupation of Alcatraz Island (2010 Photograph)..

The Red Power movement is the activist movement that came to prominence in the 1960s. [9] :16 It was the Civil Rights Movement of the American Indian. One of the key events in the Red Power movement was the Occupation of Alcatraz. The occupation started on 20 November 1969 with 79 Indians disembarking on Alcatraz Island in the San Francisco Bay, and ended 19 months and 9 days later on 11 June 1971. The group placed demands, which consisted of the deed to Alcatraz and funding to establish a university and a cultural center. [33] These demands were rejected, but the event received considerable media attention.

Throughout the 1960s, the battle to regain fishing rights that had been previously guaranteed in treaties during the mid-nineteenth century but later restricted after WWII for conservation purposes, continued in the northwestern United States. [13] :185 A series of fish-ins occurred, as well as protests in Olympia, Washington. The National Indian Youth Council spearheaded the campaign. Marlon Brando joined the fish-in effort and was arrested along with Episcopal minister John Yaryan on 2 March 1964 during a NIYC fish-in on the Puyallup River. [13] :195 Over the course of the fish-in efforts, over 45 tribes came together to support and help. For this reason, Clyde Warrior, a leader of the NIYC, considered the fish-in protests to be "the beginning of a new era in the history of American Indians" and other members of the NIYC considered the protesting to be "the greatest Indian victory of modern day." [13] :199–200

In August 1970 and in June 1971, two separate occupations of Mount Rushmore occurred. These were efforts to reclaim the Black Hills and to insist that the Fort Laramie Treaty of 1868 be honored and recognized by the United States of America. [34]

In November 1972, the Trail of Broken Treaties Caravan occurred. [4] This involved the American Indian Movement, the National Indian Brotherhood (a Canadian organization), the Native American Rights Fund, the National Indian Youth Council, the National American Indian Council, the National Council on Indian Work, National Indian Leadership Training, and the American Indian Committee on Alcohol and Drug Abuse. The cross-country caravan eventually converged on Washington D.C. where the organizations demonstrated for six days. Eventually, a group took over the Bureau of Indian Affairs. Many public documents where destroyed during the takeover. [4]

A more violent demonstration began in February 1973, when members of the American Indian Movement and the Oglala Sioux occupied the site of the Wounded Knee Massacre of 1890 located in the Pine Ridge Reservation in South Dakota. This siege ended after 71 days with the surrender of the AIM group. Two Indians, Frank Clearwater and Buddy Lamont, were killed; one federal marshal was injured. [4]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tribal sovereignty in the United States</span> Type of political status of Native Americans

Tribal sovereignty in the United States is the concept of the inherent authority of Indigenous tribes to govern themselves within the borders of the United States.

<i>United States v. Washington</i> 1974 court case

United States v. Washington, 384 F. Supp. 312, aff'd, 520 F.2d 676, commonly known as the Boldt Decision, was a legal case in 1974 heard in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The case re-affirmed the rights of American Indian tribes in the state of Washington to co-manage and continue to harvest salmon and other fish under the terms of various treaties with the U.S. government. The tribes ceded their land to the United States but reserved the right to fish as they always had. This included their traditional locations off the designated reservations.

Indigenous land rights are the rights of Indigenous peoples to land and natural resources therein, either individually or collectively, mostly in colonised countries. Land and resource-related rights are of fundamental importance to Indigenous peoples for a range of reasons, including: the religious significance of the land, self-determination, identity, and economic factors. Land is a major economic asset, and in some Indigenous societies, using natural resources of land and sea form the basis of their household economy, so the demand for ownership derives from the need to ensure their access to these resources. Land can also be an important instrument of inheritance or a symbol of social status. In many Indigenous societies, such as among the many Aboriginal Australian peoples, the land is an essential part of their spirituality and belief systems.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tribe (Native American)</span> Formal Native American tribe recognized by the American federal government

In the United States, an American Indian tribe, Native American tribe, Alaska Native village, Indigenous tribe or Tribal nation may be any extant or historical tribe, clan, band, nation, or community of Native Americans in the United States. Modern forms of these entities are often associated with land or territory of an Indian reservation. "Federally recognized Indian tribe" is a legal term in United States law with a specific meaning.

In Canada, an Indian band or band, sometimes referred to as a First Nation band or simply a First Nation, is the basic unit of government for those peoples subject to the Indian Act. Bands are typically small groups of people: the largest in the country, the Six Nations of the Grand River First Nation had 22,294 members in September 2005, and many have a membership below 100 people. Each First Nation is typically represented by a band council chaired by an elected chief, and sometimes also a hereditary chief. As of 2013, there were 614 bands in Canada. Membership in a band is controlled in one of two ways: for most bands, membership is obtained by becoming listed on the Indian Register maintained by the government. As of 2013, there were 253 First Nations which had their own membership criteria, so that not all status Indians are members of a band.

The Trail of Broken Treaties was a 1972 cross-country caravan of American Indian and First Nations organizations that started on the West Coast of the United States and ended at the Department of Interior headquarters building at the US capital of Washington, D.C. Participants called for the restoration of tribes’ treaty-making authority, the abolition of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, and federal investment in jobs, housing, and education.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Red Power movement</span> Native American youth movement

The Red Power movement was a social movement led by Native American youth to demand self-determination for Native Americans in the United States. Organizations that were part of the Red Power Movement include the American Indian Movement (AIM) and the National Indian Youth Council (NIYC). This movement sought the rights for Native Americans to make policies and programs for themselves while maintaining and controlling their own land and resources. The Red Power movement took a confrontational and civil disobedience approach to inciting change in United States to Native American affairs compared to using negotiations and settlements, which national Native American groups such as National Congress of American Indians had before. Red Power centered around mass action, militant action, and unified action.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Discovery doctrine</span> Concept of public international law

The discovery doctrine, or doctrine of discovery, is a disputed interpretation of international law during the Age of Discovery, introduced into United States municipal law by the US Supreme Court Justice John Marshall in Johnson v. McIntosh (1823). In Marshall's formulation of the doctrine, discovery of territory previously unknown to Europeans gave the discovering nation title to that territory against all other European nations, and this title could be perfected by possession. A number of legal scholars have criticized Marshall's interpretation of the relevant international law. In recent decades, advocates for Indigenous rights have campaigned against the doctrine. In 2023, the Vatican formally repudiated the doctrine.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Canadian Aboriginal law</span> Canadian law regarding indigenous people

Canadian Aboriginal law is the body of law of Canada that concerns a variety of issues related to Indigenous peoples in Canada. Canadian Aboriginal Law is different from Canadian Indigenous law: In Canada, Indigenous Law refers to the legal traditions, customs, and practices of Indigenous peoples and groups. Aboriginal peoples as a collective noun is a specific term of art used in legal documents, including the Constitution Act, 1982, and includes First Nations, Inuit and Métis people. Canadian Aboriginal law provides certain constitutionally recognized rights to land and traditional practices. Canadian Aboriginal Law enforces and interprets certain treaties between the Crown and Indigenous people, and manages much of their interaction. A major area of Aboriginal law involves the duty to consult and accommodate.

In Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States the term treaty rights specifically refers to rights for indigenous peoples enumerated in treaties with settler societies that arose from European colonization.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Congress of American Indians</span> Non-governmental organization

The National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) is an American Indian and Alaska Native rights organization. It was founded in 1944 to represent the tribes and resist federal government pressure for termination of tribal rights and assimilation of their people. These were in contradiction of their treaty rights and status as sovereign entities. The organization continues to be an association of federally recognized and state-recognized Indian tribes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Native American civil rights</span> Legal, social, or ethical principles pertaining to Native Americans

Native American civil rights are the civil rights of Native Americans in the United States. Native Americans are citizens of their respective Native nations as well as of the United States, and those nations are characterized under United States law as "domestic dependent nations", a special relationship that creates a tension between rights retained via tribal sovereignty and rights that individual Natives have as U.S. citizens. This status creates tension today, but was far more extreme before Native people were uniformly granted U.S. citizenship in 1924. Assorted laws and policies of the United States government, some tracing to the pre-Revolutionary colonial period, denied basic human rights—particularly in the areas of cultural expression and travel—to indigenous people.

Native American self-determination refers to the social movements, legislation and beliefs by which the Native American tribes in the United States exercise self-governance and decision-making on issues that affect their own people.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Indian Youth Council</span>

The National Indian Youth Council (NIYC) is the second oldest American Indian organization in the United States with a membership of more than 15,000. It was the first independent native student organization, and one of the first native organizations to use direct action protests as a means to pursue its goals. During the 1960s, NIYC acted primarily as a civil rights organization. It was very active in the movement to preserve tribal fishing rights in the Northwest.

The following is an alphabetical list of topics related to Indigenous peoples in Canada, comprising the First Nations, Inuit and Métis peoples.

The Native American Rights Fund (NARF) is a non-profit organization, based in Boulder, Colorado, that uses existing laws and treaties to ensure that U.S. state governments and the U.S. federal government live up to their legal obligations. NARF also "provides legal representation and technical assistance to Indian tribes, organizations and individuals nationwide."

The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to United States federal Indian law and policy:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Council of American Indians</span>

The National Council of American Indians(NCAI) was established in February 1926. The beginnings of inquiry about this council began with Zitkála-Šá (also known as Gertrude Bonnin) and Theodora Cunningham on March 1, 1926. This organization's purpose was to advocate for Native American rights and representation before the United States government. The National Council of American Indians focused on the Legislative Branch and their Congressional bills. The council's initial concerns included the H.R. 7826; a bill that would give Congress the power to jail any Indian for six months without trial or any court review. In addition to this, this bill would enforce a $100.00 fine every time a rule was broken within the time served in prison, as outlined by the regulations. Zitkála-Šá, along with her husband Raymond Bonnin, founded the National Council of American Indians. They both were Yankton Sioux Indigenous people. Zitkála-Šá and Raymond Bonnin's contributions to the National Council of American Indians started with its establishment as well as its leadership.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of Native Americans in Washington, D.C.</span>

The local history of Native Americans in Washington, D.C., dates back at least 4,000 years.

References

  1. Robbins, Dorothy M (30 July 1997). "A Short History of Pan-Indianism". Native American Information Service. Retrieved 14 September 2009.
  2. Robbins, Dorothy M. "ABORIGINAL IDENTITY IN THE CANADIAN CONTEXT" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 February 2016. Retrieved 2 April 2013. National loyalties and identities characterize the modern nation-state but in Aboriginal communities, identities are often not region-wide and are not ethnic in the sense of "pan-Indian" identities.... To be sure, initially these individuals were not acting in consort with one another, evidencing some grand plan to transform the cultural landscape of Canada or to create a pan-Canadian Aboriginal identity
  3. Achankeng, Fonkem (2015). Nationalism and Intra-State Conflicts in the Postcolonial World. p. 434.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Waldman, Carl (2009). "Atlas of The North American Indian" (Third ed.), pp 262, 264, 241. Checkmark Books., New York ISBN   978-0-8160-6859-3
  5. Sugden, John (1986). "Early Pan-Indianism; Tecumseh's Tour of the Indian Country, 1811-1812". American Indian Quarterly. 10 (4). Retrieved 19 August 2023.
  6. "Indigenous Political Organization and Activism in Canada". The Canadian Encyclopedia . Retrieved 21 August 2019.
  7. Cowger, Thomas W. (2007). "PAN-INDIAN MOVEMENTS". Oklahoma Historical Society's Encyclopedia of Oklahoma History and Culture. Archived from the original on 25 May 2010. Retrieved 14 September 2009.
  8. Government of Canada, Library and Archives Canada (16 February 2005). "The EvidenceWeb". collectionscanada.gc.ca.
  9. 1 2 Johnson, Troy R.; Alvin M. Josephy; Joane Nagel (1999). Red power: the American Indians' fight for freedom. U.S.: University of Nebraska Press. ISBN   0-8032-7611-7.
  10. "Native American Voices: Declaration of Indian Purpose". Digital History . 16 September 2009. Archived from the original on 13 February 2009. Retrieved 16 September 2009.
  11. "C169 Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, 1989" Archived 31 October 2011 at Archive-It International Labour Organization , 2006. Retrieved on 2009-10-03.
  12. 1 2 Hoxie, Frederick E (2001). "Talking Back to Civilization", p.24. Bedford/St. Martin's, Boston, MA. ISBN   978-0-312-10385-9
  13. 1 2 3 4 Shreve, Bradley Glenn. "Red Power Rising: The National Indian Youth Council and the Origins of Intertribal Activism." Diss. U of Mexico, 2007.
  14. "Consolidated Statement of Revenue and Expenses" (PDF). AFN Executive Committee Reports. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 November 2009. Retrieved 2 April 2013.
  15. Trope, Jack F and Lisa Wyzlic. "AAIA: About Us" Archived 26 October 2009 at the Wayback Machine , 1999–2009. Retrieved on 11 October 2009.
  16. 1 2 3 "CRITFC" Archived 7 October 2009 at the Wayback Machine , 2009. Retrieved 11 October 2009.
  17. 1 2 "Congress of Aboriginal Peoples Affiliates". Archived from the original on 25 October 2009. Retrieved 20 November 2009.
  18. Hill, Beverly. "Indian Defense League of America". Retrieved on 29 September 2009.
  19. Hoxie, Frederick E. (1996). "Encyclopedia of North American Indians", p. 220. Houghton Mifflin Company, New York ISBN   0-395-66921-9
  20. "International Indian Treaty Council", 2009. Retrieved 11 October 2009.
  21. "Inter-tribal Environmental Council". 2007. Archived from the original on 2 December 2009. Retrieved 14 September 2009.
  22. 1 2 Utter, Jack (2001). American Indians: History to Today's Questions (Second ed.), p.332-333. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman. ISBN   0-8061-3313-9.
  23. "ezx.nl". enlacezapatista.ezx.nl. Retrieved 8 July 2018.
  24. Native American Journalists Association. "Native American Journalists Association", 2008. Retrieved 11 October 2009.
  25. 1 2 "Native American Rights Fund", Retrieved on 11 October 2009.
  26. 1 2 "Tribal Supreme Court Project Home" Archived 11 November 2009 at the Wayback Machine , Retrieved 11 October 2009.
  27. 1 2 Olson, James S.; Raymond Wilson (1984). Native Americans in the Twentieth Century. Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University Press. p.  157. ISBN   0-8425-2141-0.
  28. 1 2 National Indian Education Association. "NIEA Profile" Archived 5 October 2009 at the Wayback Machine , 2009. Retrieved 11 October 2009.
  29. McIntosh Kenneth W. "CRAZY SNAKE UPRISING", Oklahoma Historical Society's Encyclopedia of Oklahoma History and Culture, Retrieved 18 October 2009.
  30. 1 2 Cobb, Daniel M. (2008). "Native Activism in Cold War America", p.127. University Press of Kansas., Kansas. ISBN   978-0-7006-1597-1
  31. 1 2 Cohen, Felix S. "Handbook of Federal Indian Law", p.190.
  32. McNickle, D'Arcy and Iverson, Peter. "Native American tribalism: Indian survivals and renewals" p.119. Oxford University Press., New York, New York. ISBN   0-19-508422-5.
  33. "Alcatraz is Not an Island: The Occupation, 1969–1971" "PBS", 2002. Retrieved on 2009-09-16.
  34. Pacio, Adam G. (2008). "AIM Occupation of Mount Rushmore". Mount Rushmore Revisited. Archived from the original on 5 July 2009. Retrieved 16 September 2009.