This article needs additional citations for verification .(May 2019) |
The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES) [1] is a collaborative research project among national election studies around the world. Participating countries and polities include a common module of survey questions in their national post-election studies. The resulting data are collated together along with voting, demographic, district and macro variables into one dataset allowing comparative analysis of voting behavior from a multilevel perspective.
The CSES is published as a free, public dataset. [2] The project is administered by the CSES Secretariat, a joint effort between the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan and the GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences in Germany.
The CSES project was founded in 1994 with two major aims. The first was to promote international collaboration between national election studies. The second was to allow researchers to study variations in political institutions, especially electoral systems, and their effects on individual attitudes and behaviors, especially turnout and vote choice.
CSES datasets contain variables at three levels. The first is micro-level variables which are answered by respondents during post-election surveys in each included country. The second is district-level variables that contain election results from the electoral districts that survey respondents are situated in. The third is macro-level variables containing information about the country context and electoral system, as well as aggregate data such as economic indicators and democracy indices. This nested data structure, as depicted in Figure 1, allows for multilevel analysis.
A new thematic module is devised by the CSES Planning Committee [3] every five years. Between the final releases of the complete modules, CSES also disseminates advance releases of datasets periodically, which include partial data for modules that have not been fully released yet.
A complete table of all variables available across modules can be found on the CSES website.
CSES also has an Integrated Module Dataset (IMD) which brings together the existing Standalone CSES Modules (CSES Modules 1–5 inclusive) into one longitudinal and harmonized dataset. Variables that appear in at least three Standalone CSES Modules, up to and including CSES Module 5, are eligible for inclusion in IMD, with all polities participating in CSES included in the dataset.
CSES IMD includes over 395,000 individual-level observations across 230 elections in 59 polities, with voter evaluations of over 800 political parties. Highlights of the IMD file are party and coalition numerical codes synchronized across CSES Modules and the incorporation of data bridging variables allowing CSES data to be easily merged with other common datasets in the social sciences. CSES IMD launched in December 2018 and is being rolled out on a phased basis with the latest release, Phase 4 released in February 2024.
Module 1 | Module 2 | Module 3 | Module 4 | Module 5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Albania | 2005 | 2017 | |||
Argentina | 2015 | ||||
Australia | 1996 | 2004 | 2007 | 2013 | 2019 |
Austria | 2008 | 2013 | 2017 | ||
Belarus | 2001 | 2008 | |||
Belgium | 1999, 1999 [lower-alpha 1] | 2003 | 2019, 2019 [lower-alpha 1] | ||
Brazil | 2002 | 2006,2010 | 2014 | 2018 | |
Bulgaria | 2001 | 2014 | |||
Canada | 1997 | 2004 | 2008 | 2011, 2015 | 2019 |
Chile | 1999 | 2005 | 2009 | 2017 | |
Costa Rica | 2018 | ||||
Croatia | 2007 | ||||
Czech Republic | 1996 | 2002 | 2006,2010 | 2013 | 2017,2021 |
Denmark | 1998 | 2001 | 2007 | 2019 | |
El Salvador | 2019 | ||||
Estonia | 2011 | ||||
Finland | 2003 | 2007,2011 | 2015 | 2019 | |
France | 2002 | 2007 | 2012 | 2017 | |
Germany | 1998 | 2002, 2002 [lower-alpha 2] | 2005, 2009 | 2013 | 2017,2021 |
Great Britain | 1997 | 2005 | 2015 | 2017,2019 | |
Greece | 2009 | 2012, 2015 | 2015,2019 | ||
Hong Kong | 1998, 2000 | 2004 | 2008 | 2012 | 2016 |
Hungary | 1998 | 2002 | 2018 | ||
Iceland | 1999 | 2003 | 2007, 2009 | 2013 | 2016, 2017 |
India | 2019 | ||||
Ireland | 2002 | 2007 | 2011 | 2016 | |
Israel | 1996 | 2003 | 2006 | 2013 | 2020 |
Italy | 2006 | 2018 | |||
Japan | 1996 | 2004 | 2007 | 2013 | 2017 |
Kenya | 2013 | ||||
Kyrgyzstan | 2005 | ||||
Latvia | 2010 | 2011, 2014 | 2018 | ||
Lithuania | 1997 | 2016,2020 | |||
Mexico | 1997, 2000 | 2003 | 2006, 2009 | 2012,2015 | 2018 |
Montenegro | 2012 | 2016 | |||
Netherlands | 1998 | 2002 | 2006,2010 | 2017,2021 | |
New Zealand | 1996 | 2002 | 2008 | 2011,2014 | 2017,2020 |
Norway | 1997 | 2001 | 2005, 2009 | 2013 | 2017 |
Peru | 2000, 2001 | 2006 | 2011 | 2016 | 2021 |
Philippines | 2004 | 2010 | 2016 | ||
Poland | 1997 | 2001 | 2005, 2007 | 2011 | 2019 |
Portugal | 2002 [lower-alpha 3] | 2002, [lower-alpha 3] 2005 | 2009 | 2015 | 2019 |
Romania | 1996 | 2004 | 2009 | 2012, 2014 | 2016 |
Russia | 1999, [lower-alpha 4] 2000 [lower-alpha 4] | 2004 | |||
Serbia | 2012 | ||||
Slovakia | 2010 | 2016 | 2020 | ||
Slovenia | 1996 | 2004 | 2008 | 2011 | |
South Africa | 2009 | 2014 | |||
South Korea | 2000 | 2004 | 2008 | 2012 | 2016 |
Spain | 1996, 2000 | 2004 | 2008 | ||
Sweden | 1998 | 2002 | 2006 | 2014 | 2018 |
Switzerland | 1999 | 2003 | 2007 | 2011 | 2019 |
Taiwan | 1996 | 2001, 2004 | 2008 | 2012 | 2016, 2020 |
Thailand | 2001 | 2007 | 2011 | 2019 | |
Tunisia | 2019 | ||||
Turkey | 2011 | 2015 | 2018 | ||
Ukraine | 1998 | ||||
United States of America | 1996 | 2004 | 2008 | 2012 | 2016,2020 |
Uruguay | 2009 | 2019 |
A frequently updated election study table across all modules can be found on the CSES website.
CSES data [2] are available publicly and are free of charge. Data releases are non-proprietary – in other words the data are made available to the public without preferential or advance access to anyone. Data is available in multiple formats including for common statistical packages like STATA, SPSS, SAS and R. The data can be downloaded from the CSES website as well as via the GESIS data catalogue. The GESIS online analysis tool ZACAT can furthermore be used to browse and explore the dataset.
In conjunction with national election study collaborators, the CSES Secretariat [7] administers the CSES project. It consists of staff from the GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences in Germany and the University of Michigan, Ann-Arbor in the United States. The Secretariat is responsible for compiling the final CSES dataset by harmonizing the single country studies into a cross-national dataset. It is also responsible for collecting the district and macro data, for data documentation, and for ensuring data quality. The Secretariat, furthermore, maintains the CSES website, promotes the project, provides support to the user community, and organizes conferences and project meetings.
The CSES research agenda, study design, and questionnaires are developed by an international committee of leading scholars in political science, sociology, and survey methodology. This committee is known as the CSES Planning Committee. [3] At the beginning of each new module, a new Planning Committee is established. Nominations for the Planning Committee come from the user community, with membership of the Committee then being approved by the CSES Plenary Meeting. The Plenary Meeting is made up of national collaborators from each national election study involved in the CSES. Ideas for new modules can be submitted by anyone. More information on the current planning committee, its members, and subcommittee reports, as well as on past Planning Committees can be found on the CSES website. A list of country collaborators who participate in CSES can also be found on the CSES website.
The work of the CSES Secretariat [7] is funded by the American National Science Foundation, the GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences and the University of Michigan’s Center for Political Studies along with in-kind support from participating election studies, additional organizations that sponsor planning meetings and conferences, and the many organizations that fund election studies by CSES collaborators.
Each year, the CSES awards the GESIS Klingemann Prize [8] for the best CSES scholarship (paper, book, dissertation, or other scholarly work, broadly defined). The award is sponsored by the GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences and is named in honor of Professor Dr. Hans-Dieter Klingemann [ de ], co-founder of the CSES, an internationally renowned political scientist who made significant contributions to cross-national electoral research. Nominated works must make extensive use of CSES and have a publication date in the calendar year prior to the award, either in print or online.
A political party is an organization that coordinates candidates to compete in a particular country's elections. It is common for the members of a party to hold similar ideas about politics, and parties may promote specific ideological or policy goals.
Philip Ernest Converse was an American political scientist. He was a professor in political science and sociology at the University of Michigan who conducted research on public opinion, survey research, and quantitative social science.
Political polarization is the divergence of political attitudes away from the center, towards ideological extremes.
Comparative politics is a field in political science characterized either by the use of the comparative method or other empirical methods to explore politics both within and between countries. Substantively, this can include questions relating to political institutions, political behavior, conflict, and the causes and consequences of economic development. When applied to specific fields of study, comparative politics may be referred to by other names, such as comparative government.
An independent voter, often also called an unaffiliated voter or non-affiliated voter in the United States, is a voter who does not align themselves with a political party. An independent is variously defined as a voter who votes for candidates on issues rather than on the basis of a political ideology or partisanship; a voter who does not have long-standing loyalty to, or identification with, a political party; a voter who does not usually vote for the same political party from election to election; or a voter who self-describes as an independent.
Freedom in the World is a yearly survey and report by the U.S.-based non-governmental organization Freedom House that measures the degree of civil liberties and political rights in every nation and significant related and disputed territories around the world.
The International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) is a collaboration between different nations conducting surveys covering topics which are useful for social science research. The ISSP researchers develop questions which are meaningful and relevant to all countries which can be expressed in an equal manner in different languages. The results of the surveys provide a cross-national and cross-cultural perspective to individual national studies. By 2021, 58 countries have already taken part in the ISSP.
The German General Social Survey (ALLBUS/GGSS - Die Allgemeine Bevölkerungsumfrage der Sozialwissenschaften) is a national data generation program in Germany, which is similar to the American General Social Survey (GSS). Its mission is to collect and disseminate high quality statistical surveys on attitudes, behavior, and social structure in Germany.
Richard Rose is a political scientist, author, and academic whose comparative studies in social science have significantly influenced political science and public policy in both practice and theory. He is a Professor and Director of the Centre for the Study of Public Policy at the University of Strathclyde (UOS) in Scotland, and is a Visiting Fellow at the Robert Schuman Centre of the European University Institute and the WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
The Swiss Centre of Expertise in the Social Sciences (FORS) is a national research infrastructure, created in 2008. FORS is financed by the Swiss State Secretariat for Education and Research, the Swiss National Science Foundation, and the University of Lausanne. Its purpose is to provide services to the social science research community, to conduct research, and to publish and disseminate research findings.
The University of Michigan Institute for Social Research (ISR) is the largest academic social research and survey organization in the world, established in 1949. ISR includes more than 300 scientists from a variety of academic disciplines – including political science, psychology, sociology, economics, demography, history, anthropology, and statistics. The institute is a unit that houses five separate but interdependent centers which conduct research and maintain data archives. In 2021, Kathleen Cagney became the first woman in its history to be named Director of the institute.
Research strategies in the field of election campaign communication research are the decisions made concerning the objective, the scope, the sampling and the methodology used within a study of election campaign communication.
The GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences is the largest German infrastructure institute for the social sciences. It is headquartered in Mannheim, with a location in Cologne. With basic research-based services and consulting covering all levels of the scientific process, GESIS supports researchers in the social sciences. As of 2017, the president of GESIS is Christof Wolf.
Democracy-Dictatorship (DD), index of democracy and dictatorship or simply the DD index or the DD datasets was the binary measure of democracy and dictatorship first proposed by Adam Przeworski et al. (2010), and further developed and maintained by Cheibub, Gandhi, and Vreeland (2009). Note that the most recent dataset was updated 2008.
David M. Farrell is a political scientist. He was appointed to the Chair of Politics at University College Dublin in 2009, having returned to Ireland after two decades working at the University of Manchester, where from 2006-09 he was Head of the School of Social Sciences. A specialist in the study of electoral systems, elections and parties, he has published 15 books and over 90 articles and book chapters. His most recent books include: Political Parties and Democratic Linkage (2011), which was awarded the GESIS Klingemann Prize for the Best Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES) Scholarship, and Electoral Systems. He is the founding co-editor of Party Politics, the President of the Political Studies Association of Ireland and the Speaker of the Council of the European Consortium for Political Research. In 2013 he was elected a Member of the Royal Irish Academy. In March 2019 he and Dr Jane Suiter were awarded the Brown Democracy Medal for the Irish Citizens' Assembly Project.
The V-Dem Institute, founded by Staffan I. Lindberg in 2014, studies the qualities of government. The headquarters of the project is based at the department of political science, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Political polarization is a prominent component of politics in the United States. Scholars distinguish between ideological polarization and affective polarization, both of which are apparent in the United States. In the last few decades, the U.S. has experienced a greater surge in ideological polarization and affective polarization than comparable democracies.
Daniele Caramani is a comparative political scientist.
The Democracy Indices by V-Dem are democracy indices published by the V-Dem Institute that describe qualities of different democracies. This dataset is published on an annual basis and is publicly available and free. In particular, the V-Dem dataset is popular among political scientists and describes the characteristics of political regimes worldwide. In total, datasets released by the V-Dem Institute include information on hundreds of indicator variables describing all aspects of government, especially on the quality of democracy, inclusivity, and other economic indicators. An R package automatically bundles new data.