Criminal justice system of France

Last updated

Criminal justice system of France
TypeCriminal,Justice system, French Law
PurposeJustice
Region served
France
Main organ
Cour de Cassation, The tribunal de police, The tribunal correctionnel, Cour d’Assises
Website www.legifrance.gouv.fr

The criminal justice system of France, or the French legal system, is derived from Roman law. It is not only a feudal system in the Middle Age, but also a representative of the civil law system. France is committed to the judicial system which was gradually established after the French Revolution in the late 18th century. [1] From beginning of the 19th century to nowadays, Napoleon codified a series of significant rules and established the common court system, administrative court system as well as independent judicial system which formed a unified modern judicial system.

Contents

History

From the late Middle Ages to the early Renaissance, the earliest commence of in modern French criminal law were marked by the Templar trial which took place in the early 1300s as well as the trial of Jeanne d' Arc over a hundred years later. [2] Although the former was an instant medieval legal trial, obviously, the medieval-nowadays evolution of modern law was reflected in the latter's proceedings. In addition, France was witnessing an evolution in its criminal justice system, which was responded with a string of jury trials from the French Revolution to the 20th century, with the overall inquisitorial commitments of the ecclesiastical courts of the 13th century. Under this criminal justice system, individuals are in fact deprived of their rights and can be put into uninformed investigation or even being subjected to cruel torture and interrogation. As a result, since the late 18th century, the criticism on this inquisitorial system has been increasingly growing fiercely intensified. After the French Revolution in 1789 the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen established principles that would become significant for later legal developments. [3] Eventually, 1808 witnessed the establishment of the Code of Criminal Procedure in the litigation mode of separated prosecution and trial. After the end of World War II, the judicial committee brought out the amended version of the Code of Criminal Procedure, thus bringing the procedure into judicature. [4]

Judicial organization

Cour de Cassation

The French Cour de Cassation works as the final court of appeal for civil and criminal cases. As a judicial court, it cannot hear those cases including protesting against the government. Such cases usually fall within the scope of the administrative court, and the State Council acts as the highest court of appeal. The court was founded in the Tribunal de cassation in 1790 during the Revolution in France, which was built to have a review court which was used to amend the jurisdiction of the lower-level local privileged court. [5] The court is made up of a judge, the Prosecutor's office and the Administrative Office of Courts. The judge of the Cour de Cassation is composed of the premier president, first presidents of the chambers, justice conseillers and assistant judge conseillers referendaries. [6] Judges are appointed by the president of the republic on the recommendations of the high judicial council. The chief justice works as the highest judicial officer and shall be responsible for the court's executive branch as well as the discipline of the judges.

Tribunal de police

The tribunal de police consists of a single judge but the court is constituted by a prosecutor and a recording officer. Generally, there are five categories that violate the rules. The tribunal de police hear class five contraventions separately from one to four contraventions, with the fine ranging from 250 francs to 10,000 francs. [7] In addition, after the trial of the tribunal de police, provided that the suspect refuses to accept the judgements of the court, the suspect can appeal to French Cour d' Appeal.

Tribunal correctionnel

The tribunal correctionnel performs the duty as a court which addresses ordinary criminal cases and usually hears the crimes which ranges from two months to five years in prison or more than the fine of 10,000 francs. [8] The tribunal correctionnel is set upi n the provincial capital of each province. Furthermore, those densely populated provinces are permitted to locate more than one tribunal correctionnel independently. The court usually comprises three judges and one recorder. Since 1973, the case of the accused's consent has been permitted to be heard by the judge alone.

Cour d' Assise

Cour d’ Assises, which shoulders the responsibility of handling major criminal cases, usually hears cases of five years or more imprisonment, hard labor or death penalty. [8] Cour d’Assise, which is located in the provincial capital of each province, whose name is based on the name of the province. The court exercises jurisdiction within the range of the province. In accordance to the French Criminal Procedure Law, the composition of Cour d’ Assise is made up of the court as well as the jury. The courts implement the judge on the basis of the Court of Appeal or the First Instance, which consists of three judges and nine jurors. [9] Cour d' Assise, the only court in France that has a jury for a criminal case, harbours the combined composition of professional judge and non-professional juror. It is worth mentioning that it represents one of the biggest differences between tribunal de police and tribunal correctionnel. Moreover, the judgement made by Cour d' Assise cannot be appealed.

Criminal law

France's criminal law is featured by its concept structure instead of its result.[ citation needed ] Distinguishing itself from some aspects of civil as well as public law, it is structured with rooted middle age in royal law but is now heavily influenced by international criminal and criminological trends, without being struck by sharp-cut influence by Roman law. The innovation of the penal code in 1994 made it possible to gain a modernized and systemised treatment to the corresponding issues. However, the revolution and Napoleonic history still exert a strongly far-reaching impact. The principle of legality requires that in France crimes should be defined by law. 13 supervision has been accepted as a legitimate source of supervision for violations[ clarify ], even if they lead to imprisonment. But laws and crimes must be the product of regulations. [10] In addition, courts have issued notices immediately which are opposed to the enactment of criminal offenses, even if they are merely supervisory offenses.

Types of infraction

French criminal law provides for three classes of infractions including crimes (major crimes; akin to serious felonies), délits (less serious felonies), and contraventions (petty offenses such as driving infractions). [11]

Criminal procedure

Criminal procedure in France is regarded as mainly inquisitorial. [6] And the operational process of French criminal justice is divided into three stages of pre-trial, trial and post-trial. The first procedure in the process of prosecuting a criminal for most crimes is an investigation by a pretrial judge. Different procedures are provided for the prosecution of each class of offense.

Before trial

Before trial, a preliminary investigation conducted by a pretrial judge is a routine part of the judicial process. It transfers the case to the highly competent court on the basis of a reasonable estimation of what the accused criminals may be convicted of in the future. The criminal procedure in France requires early intervention by the examining magistrate. [12] In most common law jurisdictions, any offense, except the most trivial, is tried by the same court

Cases can be initiated in two ways. If a petition is filed with a civil claim, the magistrate has the right to proceed with the investigation. If no claim for damages is provided against the complaint, it must be transferred to the local prosecutor. If the prosecutor determines to pursue the matter, the pretrial judge will be notified. [13] Besides, the jurisdiction of the investigation is based on the initial application. Once the investigation has begun, the magistrate is free to investigate any violations related to the application and may proceed to further inquiry any person who may be involved. [14]

Persons who are ordered to appear and offer evidence must do so. Any refusal to appear before the court is deemed as punishable by contempt of court. It is not necessary for the person being investigated to take an oath like other witnesses, on the premise of the person who has been investigated is capable of calling a lawyer for assistance. Witnesses other than the civil claimant cannot acquire the assistance of a lawyer unless they are advised to accept the investigation. In such cases, the trial judge must warn the witnesses in advance. [15] As for the criminal proceedings, they shall be conducted in writing or made into a written record immediately afterwards, instead of presenting to public and likewise they are not adversary in form except in the extremely limited circumstances. [16]

If the pretrial judge determines that the case should be prosecuted, the judge will make an order for transfer. [17] And the following parts will be several various methods for addressing criminal behaviours. If the offense is regarded as a petty offense, the case will be referred to the police court. If it is deemed as a misdemeanor, it will be transferred to the appropriate lower court for trial. If the case involves a felony, it must first be referred to the district court of appeal for prosecution rather than directly to the court. [18]

The trial court

The court for tribunal de police is composed of one judge and hears the same case as for misdemeanours. [19] Cases can be referred to such courts in several aspects. In the first place, when both the offender and the complainant appear voluntarily, it is possible that the case will be concluded in a quick manner. And the other is a complaint raised by the victim or the district attorney, which is the most common formula. After the court receives the complaint, it issues a direct summons order, which will be delivered to the defendant or the defendant's residence by the bailiff of the court. The defendant must be provided a time limit of not less than five days to appear in court.< [20] For misdemeanours and police offenses, the judge may conduct a final judgement in court.

The procedure of a felony is much more complicated than that of a misdemeanour. The felony court administers all cases referred to it by the district court of appeal, and hears merely such cases. The felony court is an institution peculiar to the French legal system. The jury as one of its constituent parts, holds a meeting quarterly, and the judgement of the felony court will not be appealed to the court of appeal. Once a final order for a trial is released, the defendant should be transferred to the prison where the felony court is located. Besides, any conviction must be upheld and supported by at least five members of the nine jurors. [21] If the results of vote agree with the conviction, the judge will immediately vote on the sentence. The method of conviction is carried out based on the secret ballot in which each person proposes a penalty which must be imposed by a majority vote. Moreover, the approach of consecutive votes must be taken and performed until a penalty is confirmed. From the third round of voting, the most severe penalty was removed one by one from the proposed candidates. [21]

Juvenile justice

The period of Paternal Power

Until the 1789 revolution, the law conducted recognition about three age groups of children defined in Latin: infans (ages 0 to 7), proximus infanti (ages 7 to 10) and proximus pubertati (ages 10 to 14). [22] For each age group, judges acted the way they considered as appropriate, and were free to reach great extremes in both punishment and forgiveness. And it was common to perform deliberate imprisonment of children by parents until the end of the seventeenth century. In addition, although criminal sentences are in principle no harsher for adolescents than for adults, the penal code allows for the implementation of life imprisonment, deportation and even the death penalty for children under the age of 7. During the period of the governance of Napoleon, fathers had the right to require civil courts to imprison their children for up to one month. Additionally for older children, the magistrate of the court owns the power to determine the time limit of imprisonment, but the maximum term is one month. [23] According to the law in 1804, any father who was dissatisfied with the conduct of his child could petition the court of superior supervision to imprison the child. However, these laws also gradually began to restrict parents' right from implementing corporal punishment.

Juvenile criminal proceedings

The purpose of establishing Juvenile court aims at the particularity of juvenile crime. In 1945, the basic criminal policy against crimes committed by minors was formulated, and special juvenile judges and juvenile courts were established respectively. Cases of minor offenses against the first four grades of police offenses are still addressed before the police courts, while cases against the fifth grade of police offenses, misdemeanours and felonies are required to be tackled under the jurisdiction of the juvenile courts. The system includes several parts of juvenile judges, juvenile courts, appellate courts and juvenile felony courts. [24]

These courts are presided by one juvenile court judge with two assistants of two lay judges and one court clerk. By virtues of the referral of a juvenile judge or pretrial judge, the juvenile court hears felony cases committed by minors under the age of 16 and misdemeanours committed by minors under the age of 18. The juvenile court may order for adopting measures of protection, assistance, supervision and education for all minors, and take educational sanctions against those minors over 10 years of age. Furthermore, minors who are at the age of 13 to 16 can be sentenced. However minors can only afford half of the sentences prescribed by adults. And they cannot be remanded unless they have committed a serious crime.

In terms of the judicial structure, the juvenile felony court shares the same construction system as the common felony court, which is composed of 3 professional judges and 9 jurors. The juvenile felony court hears felonies committed by minors between the ages of 16 and 18. [25]

Works cited

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Court of Cassation (France)</span> Highest judicial court in France

The Court of Cassation is one of the four courts of last resort in France. It has jurisdiction over all civil and criminal matters triable in the judicial system; it is the supreme court of appeal in these cases. It has jurisdiction to review the law, as well as to certify questions of law, to determine miscarriages of justice. The Court is located in the Palace of Justice in the 1st arrondissement of Paris.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of France</span> Overview of Frances court system

In France, career judges are considered civil servants exercising one of the sovereign powers of the state, so French citizens are eligible for judgeship, but not citizens of the other EU countries. France's independent court system enjoys special statutory protection from the executive branch. Procedures for the appointment, promotion, and removal of judges vary depending on whether it is for the ordinary or administrative stream. Judicial appointments in the judicial stream must be approved by a special panel, the High Council of the Judiciary. Once appointed, career judges serve for life and cannot be removed without specific disciplinary proceedings conducted before the council with due process.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of Israel</span> Part of the article of the series of government of Israel

The judicial system of Israel consists of secular courts and religious courts. The law courts constitute a separate and independent unit of Israel's Ministry of Justice. The system is headed by the President of the Supreme Court and the Minister of Justice.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Law of France</span>

French law has a dual jurisdictional system comprising private law, also known as judicial law), and public law.

In France, a cour d'assises, or Court of Assizes or Assize Court, is a criminal trial court with original and appellate limited jurisdiction to hear cases involving defendants accused of felonies, meaning crimes as defined in French law. It is the only French court consisting in a jury trial.

In France, the Tribunal d'instance is a judicial lower court of record of first instance for general civil suits and includes a criminal division, the Police Court, which hears cases of misdemeanors or summary offences (contraventions). Since it has original jurisdiction, the Court's rulings may be appealed to a French appellate court or Supreme Court. The court was formerly known as a Justice of the Peace Court until the judicial restructuring of 1958.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tribunal of first instance (Belgium)</span> Trial court in Belgium

The tribunals of first instance are the main trial courts in the judicial system of Belgium. The tribunals of first instance are courts of general jurisdiction; in the sense that they have original jurisdiction over all types of cases not explicitly attributed to other courts. They handle a wide range of civil cases, criminal cases, and cases under the scope of juvenile law and family law. They also hear appeals against the judgements of the police tribunals and justices of the peace. The judgements of the tribunals of first instance can be appealed to the courts of appeal in turn. There is a tribunal of first instance for each of the twelve judicial arrondissements ("districts") of Belgium, except for the arrondissement of Brussels. The arrondissement of Brussels has two tribunals of first instance, a Dutch-speaking one and a French-speaking one, due to the sensitive linguistical situation in the area. The territories of the current judicial arrondissements largely coincide with those of the provinces of Belgium. Most of the tribunals of first instance have multiple geographical divisions, with each having their own seat. As of 2020, the 13 tribunals of first instance have 27 seats in total. Further below, an overview is provided of all seats of the tribunals of first instance per arrondissement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Police tribunal (Belgium)</span> Belgian court for traffic and minor crimes

The police tribunal is the traffic court and trial court which tries minor contraventions in the judicial system of Belgium. It is the lowest Belgian court with criminal jurisdiction. There is a police tribunal for each judicial arrondissement ("district"), except for Brussels-Halle-Vilvoorde, where there are multiple police tribunals due to the area's sensitive linguistic situation. Most of them hear cases in multiple seats per arrondissement. As of 2018, there are 15 police tribunals in total, who hear cases in 38 seats. Further below, an overview is provided of all seats of the police tribunal per judicial arrondissement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Court of appeal (Belgium)</span> Appellate court in Belgium

The courts of appeal are the main appellate courts in the judicial system of Belgium, which hear appeals against judgements of the tribunals of first instance, the enterprise tribunals and the presidents of those tribunals in their judicial area. There are five courts of appeal for each of the five judicial areas, which are the largest geographical subdivisions of Belgium for judicial purposes. The division of the Belgian territory into the five judicial areas is laid down in article 156 of the Belgian Constitution. A judicial area covers multiple judicial arrondissements ("districts"), except for the judicial area of Mons. Each arrondissement has a tribunal of first instance. Further below, an overview is provided of the five courts of appeal and the judicial arrondissements their judicial area covers. It is important to note that the courts of appeal do not hear appeals against judgements of the labour tribunals; these are heard by the courts of labour.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of Niger</span> Judiciary body of Niger

The current judiciary of Niger was established with the creation of the Fourth Republic in 1999. The constitution of December 1992 was revised by national referendum on 12 May 1996 and, again, by referendum, revised to the current version on 18 July 1999. It is an inquisitorial system based on the Napoleonic Code, established in Niger during French colonial rule and the 1960 constitution of Niger. The Court of Appeals reviews questions of fact and law, while the Supreme Court reviews application of the law and constitutional questions. The High Court of Justice (HCJ) deals with cases involving senior government officials. The justice system also includes civil criminal courts, customary courts, traditional mediation, and a military court. The military court provides the same rights as civil criminal courts; however, customary courts do not. The military court cannot try civilians.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of Chile</span>

The judiciary of the Republic of Chile includes one Supreme Court, one Constitutional Court, 16 Courts of Appeal, 84 Oral Criminal Tribunals and Guarantee Judges; 7 Military Tribunals; over 300 Local Police Courts; and many other specialized Tribunals and courts in matter of family, labor, customs, taxes, electoral affairs, etc.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of Belgium</span> Court system overview

The judiciary of Belgium is similar to the French judiciary. Belgium evolved from a unitary to a federal state, but its judicial system has not been adapted to a federal system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Court of appeal (France)</span> French court

In France, a cour d’appel of the ordre judiciaire (judiciary) is a juridiction de droit commun du second degré, a. It examines judgements, for example from the correctional tribunal or a tribunal de grande instance. When one of the parties is not satisfied with the verdict, it can appeal. While communications from jurisdictions of first instance are termed "judgements", or judgments, a court of appeal renders an arrêt (verdict), which may either uphold or annul the initial judgment. A verdict of the court of appeal may be further appealed en cassation. If the appeal is admissible at the cour de cassation, that court does not re-judge the facts of the matter a third time, but may investigate and verify whether the rules of law were properly applied by the lower courts.

A police tribunal is a criminal jurisdiction which judges all classes of contraventions committed by adults. More serious offenses (infractions) are judged by a tribunal correctionnel, correctional tribunal, when they are délits or misdemeanors, or by a cour d'assises.

<i>Tribunal correctionnel</i> French court of first instance for penal matters

In France, the tribunal correctionnel is the court of first instance that governs in penal matters over offenses classified as misdemeanors and committed by an adult. In 2013, French correctional tribunals rendered 576,859 judgments on action publique, pronounced 501,171 verdicts and homologué 67,983 compositions pénales.

In France the jurisdictions of the ordre judiciaire, of the French court system are empowered to try either litigation between persons or criminal law cases. They may intervene:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judicial system of Ivory Coast</span>

The judicial system of Ivory Coast was greatly influenced by its time as a French colony. The system has two levels. The lower courts include courts of appeals, courts of first instance, courts of assize, and the justice of the peace courts. The upper level includes the Supreme Court, the High Court of Justice, and the State Security Court. The remainder of the professional judiciary exists in the Central Administration of the Ministry of Justice. All members of the professional judiciary must hold a bachelor of law degree and can not hold an elected office while a member.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">French criminal law</span>

Criminal law in France is one of the branches of the juridical system of the French Republic. The field of criminal law is defined as a sector of French law, and is a combination of public and private law, insofar as it punishes private behavior on behalf of society as a whole. Its function is to define, categorize, prevent, and punish criminal offenses committed by a person, whether a natural person or a juridical person. In this sense it is of a punitive nature, as opposed to civil law in France, which settles disputes between individuals, or administrative law which deals with issues between individuals and government.

This glossary of French criminal law is a list of explanations or translations of contemporary and historical concepts of criminal law in France.

In French law, the investigation phase in a criminal proceeding is the procedure during which an investigating judge gathers evidence on the commission of an offense and decides whether to refer the persons charged to the trial court.

References

  1. ↑ Simon Schama – Citizens: A Chronicle of the French Revolution . Penguin, [1989] 2004. p. 442
  2. ↑ Hsieh, Julia (11 September 2012). "The History of French Criminal Law".
  3. ↑ Walters, Jonah (14 July 2015). "A Guide to the French Revolution".
  4. ↑ Wheatcroft, Andrew (1999). The Road to War (2nd ed.). London: Penguin Books. ISBN   978-0-14-028530-7. pp. 328–30
  5. ↑ Judicial Organization in France, 33 Can. L. Times 565 (1913)
  6. 1 2 Ministry of Justice (2012), The French legal system. Ministère de la Justice. Retrieved from http://www.justice.gouv.fr/art_pix/french_legal_system.pdf
  7. ↑ "Police Court Justice in France: Investigations and Hearing in Ten Cases in the Tribunal de Police"
  8. 1 2 Donovan, J. (2010). Studies in Legal History: Juries and the Transformation of Criminal Justice in France in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. University of North Carolina Press.
  9. ↑ Perroud, J. “THE ORGANIZATION OF THE COURTS AND THE JUDICIAL BENCH IN FRANCE.” Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law11.1 (1929): 1–18. Web.
  10. ↑ Bell, J. (2008). Criminal Law. Principles of French Law, 201-240. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199541393.003.0008
  11. ↑ Jean 2010, p. 7.
  12. ↑ CPP, art. 79.
  13. ↑ CPP, art. 80.
  14. ↑ CPP, art. 86.
  15. ↑ Kock, G. (1960). Criminal Proceedings in France. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 9(2), 253-262. doi: 10.2307/837194
  16. ↑ CPP, art. 104,105.
  17. ↑ CPP, art. 178.
  18. ↑ CPP, art. 213.
  19. ↑ CPP, art. 544.
  20. ↑ CPP, art. 178,180.
  21. 1 2 CPP, art. 362.
  22. ↑ Blatier, C. “Juvenile Justice in France. The Evolution of Sentencing for Children and Minor Delinquents.” British Journal of Criminology 39.2 (1999): 240–252. Web.
  23. ↑ Catta, E (1988), A quoi tu juges? Paris: Flammarion.
  24. ↑ CODE PENAL [C. PEN.] art. 45-174 (1945) (Fr.).
  25. ↑ "Ordonnance n° 45-174 du 2 février 1945 relative à l'enfance délinquante. - Legifrance". www.legifrance.gouv.fr.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.