Fairchild AU-23 Peacemaker

Last updated
AU-23 Peacemaker
Fairchild AU-23A Peacemaker in flight.jpg
Fairchild AU-23A Peacemaker in flight
General information
TypeArmed gunship, counter-insurgency, utility transport
Manufacturer Fairchild Aircraft
Primary users United States Air Force
Number built35
History
First flight1971
Developed from
Pilatus PC-6 Porter

The Fairchild AU-23 Peacemaker is an armed fixed-wing counter-insurgency (COIN) and utility transport aircraft. It was a license-built derivative of the Pilatus PC-6 Porter, produced by the American conglomerate Fairchild Industries. [1]

Contents

The AU-23 originated in the Credible Chase program, which was started by the Aeronautical Systems Division in 1971 to seek a capable armed light utility aircraft for potential use in the then-ongoing Vietnam War. The PC-6 was selected along with the Helio AU-24 Stallion to undergo an evaluation, during which the type was flown by personnel of the United States Air Force (USAF), Royal Thai Air Force (RTAF) and Republic of Vietnam Air Force (RVNAF). Numerous live combat missions were flown in North Thailand as part of this evaluation. Work was halted on the initiative after it was concluded that extensive upgrades would be necessary to realistically enable the AU-23 to participate in frontline combat.

The existing 34 aircraft were temporarily stored before being ultimately sold to the Royal Thai Air Force (RTAF). Typically flown on border surveillance and COIN operations, the RTAF has continued to operate their AU-23s into the twenty-first century. [2] [3]

Design and development

In May 1971, the Aeronautical Systems Division at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, began work on a project to evaluate the potential use of armed, light utility, short-takeoff-and-landing aircraft for combat operations in Southeast Asia. This program, named Credible Chase, was designed to add mobility and firepower to the South Vietnamese Republic of Vietnam Air Force (RVNAF) in a relatively short time. [4] It was recognised that, in addition to suitable performance, the prospective aircraft ought to be relatively easy to maintain as well as to fly. [5]

Two commercial aircraft were selected for evaluation, the Fairchild Porter and the Helio AU-24 Stallion. [6] [7] Initial performance testing was conducted with leased aircraft at Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, and was successful enough to warrant a combat evaluation. The Porter, designated AU-23A, was fitted with a side-firing 20mm three-barreled M197 electric cannon, four wing pylons, and a center fuselage station for external ordnance. The 20 mm cannon was essentially a three-barrel version of the M61 Vulcan six-barrel 20 mm cannon. The aircraft could carry a variety of ordnance, including forward-firing gun pods, 500 and 250 lb (230 and 110 kg) bombs, napalm units, cluster bomb units, flares, rockets, smoke grenades, and leaflet dispensers.[ citation needed ] If required, the aircraft could be converted to a civil utility configuration within the space of one hour. [8]

Operational history

Fairchild AU-23A Peacemaker at Eglin AFB, Florida in 1972 Au23-4.jpg
Fairchild AU-23A Peacemaker at Eglin AFB, Florida in 1972

The combat evaluation, PAVE COIN, was performed in June and July 1971. The AU-23A was tested for eight possible missions - armed escort of helicopters, close air support, hamlet defense, STOL airlift and resupply, armed reconnaissance, border surveillance, forward air control, and counter-infiltration. USAF crews flew 73 missions (94 sorties) and RVNAF crews flew 68 missions (85 sorties). Several types of weapons were test dropped/fired, including 2.75-inch (70 mm) rockets (explosive and smoke), CBU-14 cluster bombs, MK 6 Mod 3 flares, and MK 81, -82, and -106 practice bombs. More than 8,000 rounds of 20 mm ammunition were fired, both high-explosive incendiary and target-practice tracer types. Several problems were discovered during the PAVE COIN program, the most serious was the extreme vulnerability of the aircraft to all but the lightest anti-aircraft fire (below 12.7 mm). Despite the problems, the USAF continued with the development program and ordered 15 AU-23As for further testing.[ citation needed ]

The 4400th Special Operations Squadron (Provisional) was created to complete the operational testing and evaluation of the Credible Chase aircraft. [4] The first AU-23A (72-1306) was delivered to the 4400th SOS on 2 January 1972, followed by two more aircraft (72-1304 and 72-1305) at the end of the month. Testing continued until 4 February, at which point all three aircraft were grounded after the discovery of cracks in the rudder assemblies. [4] The first three aircraft were returned to Fairchild for repair, and the delivery of new aircraft resumed in late April 1972. On 10 May 1972, an AU-23A (S/N 72-1309) crashed after an in-flight engine failure. The pilot was not hurt, but all AU-23As were temporarily grounded throughout the accident investigation, which was lifted on 22 May. The last AU-23A was delivered on June 7 and testing was completed on June 28.[ citation needed ]

The 4400th recommended the aircraft not be used in combat without a major upgrade program. Specific problems identified included a slow combat speed (135 knots (250 km/h)), a low working altitude, no capability for "zoom" escapes after delivering ordnance, and a complete lack of armor protection for the crew and vital aircraft systems. Accordingly, both aircraft were rejected for service. [9] On 30 June 1972, the 4400th SOS ferried the AU-23As to Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, Arizona, where they were placed into temporary storage. [4]

Prior to entering storage, one AU-23A had been briefly deployed to Thailand during the summer of 1971, during which it was flown by Royal Thai Air Force (RTAF) pilots against communist guerrillas active in the country's north, reportedly conducting 83 combat missions, during which the type garnered favourable opinion amongst Thai officials. [4] In May 1976, an initial order for 20 ex-USAF aircraft was placed by Thailand. [10] [11] Upon delivery, these were flown by both 202 Squadron and 531 Squadron. Over time, these aircraft have received various upgrades, included the replacement of analogue instrumentation with digital counterparts (improving their night flight capability), and the provision of FLIR Systems Star Safire III electro-optic/infrared sensors. [12] [4] Typically, Thai AU-23As were tasked with conducting border surveillance and counter-infiltration operations. [13] The RTAF has used the aircraft for several atypical mission types, including rainmaking and communicating with ground personnel (via loudspeakers) during natural disasters. [12]

The AU-23A was not the only aircraft operated in the COIN role by the RTAF, it also operated the North American Rockwell OV-10 Bronco. [14] During the 1990s, Thailand was reportedly looking at options, such as the Dassault/Dornier Alpha Jet, as a potential replacement for its AU-23A fleet. [15] In 2022, the type's 50th year of operations with the RTAF, 12 of the 33 aircraft originally supplied reportedly remained in the service's inventory, and eight were stated to be operational. Furthermore, it was stated that the AU-23A could continue to be operated for at least another 15 years. [12]

Operators

Royal Thai Air Force Fairchild AU-23 Peacemaker in 2013 Royal Thai Air Force Fairchild AU-23 Peacemaker in 2013.jpg
Royal Thai Air Force Fairchild AU-23 Peacemaker in 2013
Royal Thai Air Force Fairchild AU-23 Peacemaker (s/n 2077 / BJTh2-18/19) in 2018 B.JTh2-18-19 (42077) (28107184349).jpg
Royal Thai Air Force Fairchild AU-23 Peacemaker (s/n 2077 / BJTh2-18/19) in 2018
Flag of Thailand.svg  Thailand
Flag of the United States (23px).png  United States

Specifications

XM197 cannon on an AU-23A Fairchild AU-23A Peacemaker with XM197 20mm cannon.jpg
XM197 cannon on an AU-23A

Data fromAir Force Magazine [10]

General characteristics

Performance

Armament

Incidents

Royal Thai Air Force 501 Sqn AU-23A JTh2-20/19 coded 42079 (former FY 74-2079) crash-landed in Khlong Hoi Khong district on 5 March 2019. [19]

See also

Related development

Aircraft of comparable role, configuration, and era


References

Citations

  1. ↑ Gervasi 1981, p. 85.
  2. ↑ Production list, (s/n 2020, 2039, 2050 to 2062 and s/n 2073 to 2092, pc-6.com
  3. ↑ USA - Air Force (1948 - now) - Au-23, scramble.nl/military-database
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Taghvaee, Babak (15 April 2025). "Old Turbo Porters never die". Key Aero. Retrieved 29 October 2026.
  5. ↑ Mizokami, Kyle (5 November 2014). "The U.S. Air Force's Tiny Gunships Packed a Powerful Punch". War Is Boring . Retrieved 29 October 2026.
  6. ↑ "AAHS Journal". American Aviation Historical Society . Vol. 45. 2000. p. 174. Retrieved 29 October 2026.
  7. ↑ Davis 1982, pp. 63-64.
  8. ↑ The Fairchild Peacemaker Aircraft. Vol. 120. Congressional Record: Proceedings and Debates of the ... Congress. 1974. p. 39231. Retrieved 29 October 2026.
  9. ↑ "Naval History". United States Naval Institute. 2005. p. 51. Retrieved 29 October 2026.
  10. ↑ "Moody's Industrial News Reports". Moody's Investors Service. 1972. p. 2,435. Retrieved 29 October 2026.
  11. 1 2 3 Nanuam, Wassana (24 November 2022). "Air force still flying world's only Peacemaker fleet". Bangkok Post.
  12. ↑ Newman, Grant Trevor (4 March 2025). "Night Show at The Royal Thai Aviation Museum". Vintage Aviation News. Retrieved 29 October 2026.
  13. ↑ van Woezik, René (19 April 1995). "Shopping around". Flight International . Retrieved 29 October 2026.
  14. ↑ "Thailand finds aircraft bargains in Germany". Flight International . 21 July 1999. Retrieved 29 October 2026.
  15. ↑ Fairchild AU-23A Peacemaker Archived 18 May 2019 at the Wayback Machine , wings-aviation.ch
  16. ↑ Current status, 30 April 2024, pc-6.com.
  17. ↑ "Thai Military Aircraft Designations". designation-systems.net. Retrieved 18 March 2025.
  18. ↑ Wassana Nanuam (5 Mar 2019). "Old air force plane crashes". Bangkok Post.

Bibliography

Further reading