Healthcare in Austria

Last updated

Life expectancy development in Austria Life expectancy in Austria.svg
Life expectancy development in Austria
Austrian health care spending as a percentage of GDP for 1970 to 2015, compared with other nations Health care cost rise.svg
Austrian health care spending as a percentage of GDP for 1970 to 2015, compared with other nations

The nation of Austria has a two-tier health care system in which virtually all individuals receive publicly funded care, but they also have the option to purchase supplementary private health insurance. Care involving private insurance plans (sometimes referred to as "comfort class" care) can include more flexible visiting hours and private rooms and doctors. [1] Some individuals choose to completely pay for their care privately. [1]

Contents

Healthcare in Austria is universal for residents of Austria as well as those from other EU countries. [2] Students from an EU/EEA country or Switzerland with national health insurance in their home country can use the European Health Insurance Card. [3] Self-insured students have to pay an insurance fee of EUR 52.68 per month. [3]

Enrollment in the public health care system is generally automatic and is linked to employment, [4] however insurance is also guaranteed to co-insured persons (i.e. spouses and dependents [5] ), pensioners, students, the disabled, and those receiving unemployment benefits. [5] Enrollment is compulsory, and it is not possible to cross-shop the various social security institutions. [4] Employers register their employees with the correct institution and deduct the health insurance tax from employees' salaries. [6] Some people, such as the self-employed, are not automatically enrolled but are eligible to enroll in the public health insurance scheme. [4] The cost of public insurance is based on income and is not related to individual medical history or risk factors. [6]

All insured persons are issued an e-Card, which must be presented when visiting a doctor (however some doctors only treat privately insured patients). The e-Card allows for the digitization of health claims and replaces the earlier health insurance voucher. [7] Additionally the e-Card can be used for electronic signatures. [8] E-Cards issued after October 2019 will also contain a photo of the card owner to prevent fraud. [9]

Hospitals and clinics can be either state-run or privately run. [4] Austria has a relatively high density of hospitals and physicians; In 2011 there were 4.7 Physicians per 1000 people, which is slightly greater than the average for Europe. [4] In-patient care is emphasized within the Austrian healthcare system; Austria has the most acute care discharges per 100 inhabitants in Europe and the average hospital stay is 6.6 days compared with an EU average of 6. [4]

By 2008 the economic crisis caused a deep recession, and out-of-pocket payments for healthcare increased to become 28% of health expenditures. [10] By 2010, Austria's public spending has decreased overall, but it was 15.5%, compared to 13.9% fifteen years earlier. [11]

International comparisons

Austria's health care system was given 9th place by the World Health Organization (WHO) in their mid-2000s (decade) international ranking. [1] In 2015 the cost of healthcare was 11.2% of GDP -the fifth highest in Europe. [12]

The city of Vienna has been listed as 1st in quality of living (which includes a variety of social services) by the Mercer Consultants. [1]

In a sample of 13 developed countries Austria was 5th in its population weighted usage of medication in 14 classes in 2009 and fourth 2013. The drugs studied were selected on the basis that the conditions treated had high incidence, prevalence and/or mortality, caused significant long-term morbidity and incurred high levels of expenditure and significant developments in prevention or treatment had been made in the last 10 years. The study noted considerable difficulties in cross border comparison of medication use. [13]

It was placed 12th in Europe by the Euro health consumer index in 2015. The fact that abortion is not carried out in the public healthcare system reduced its rank. [14]

Waiting times

Despite government claims that no noteworthy waits exist (2007), medium or long waits are normal for at least some elective surgery. Hospital organizations in 2005 stated that mean hip and knee replacement wait times range from 1–12 months, but are generally 3–6 months. In Styria and Upper Austria mean hip replacement wait times were 108 days (about 3.5 months) and mean knee replacement 172 days (5.5 months), cor cataract surgery 142 days (4 months 20 days). For Upper Austria they were 10.3 weeks (72 days, 2 months 11 days) 21.3 weeks (149 days, almost 5 months) and 12 weeks (84 days, or 2 months 23 days). A survey by Statistik Austria found an average wait time of 102 days for eye lens surgery, 78 days (2.5 months) for hip joint surgery, 97 days (3 months 5–5 days) for knee joint surgery, 39 days (1 month 8- days) for coronary surgery, and 28 days (4 weeks) for cardiac surgery [15]

Waiting times can be shortened by arranging to visit the same hospital doctor in a private hospital or clinic. Waits are also sometimes illegally shortened in return for legal or illegal additional payments. Hospital doctors also receive additional fees to treat privately insured patients even though they are only supposed to receive better amenities/accommodations. They may therefore treat private patients sooner. [16] Two Austrian health insurance companies advertised low wait times on their web sites. In a survey in Lower Austria, 8% of respondents said that they were offered shorter waiting times for additional private payments. [15] According to Statistics Austria, 2007, in Thomson & Mossialos, 2009, as cited in Health Systems in Transition (HiT) profile of Austria, 2013, social health insurance patients waited twice as long for cardiac catheterization, and 3-4 times as long for cataract and knee surgery. Compared to individuals with private supplementary insurance, those covered by statutory health insurance wait from three to four times as long for cataract operations and knee operations. For cardiac catheterization procedures, statutory insurance patients wait twice as long. Some states have created objective waiting list guidelines to counteract this. [11]

History

A hospital in Kittsee, photographed June 2006 Hospital, Kittsee, Austria.jpg
A hospital in Kittsee, photographed June 2006

Austria's health care system was developed alongside other social welfare programs by the Social Democratic Party of Austria in Vienna (during its classical 'Red Vienna' period) initially. [17]

Austria's health care began primarily in 1956 with the "Allgemeines Sozialversicherungsgesetz" better referred to as the General Social Insurance Law or ASVG, which mandated that healthcare is a right. [18] Individuals become eligible and are automatically registered for healthcare upon employment. [5] They get included into the insurance fund known, as Krankenkasse, which results in receiving an insurance card that covers healthcare but also pensions, and unemployment as well. The level of coverage rapidly grew since 1955-1956 ratification of the General Social Insurance Law, and by 1980, it included unrestricted hospital care, and preventive check-ups. [11]

In 2010 under the chancellorship of Werner Faymann, the Social Democratic Health Minister Alois Stöger began the process of reform as a response to rising healthcare costs and difficulties with capacity. The system is financed in part with public debt, which had become a significant challenge in the aftermath of the recession that hit Austria in 2009. Reforms in 2013 aimed to increase capacity, improve the quality of care and address fiscal concerns in concert with the Finance Ministry. [19] A key outcome of the reform with the introduction of a budget cap on healthcare expenditure. [19] The idea of structural reform was not entertained. Because of the federal structure of Austria, the legal structure of the social security programme is unusually complex with multiple entities at the state level under the umbrella of the national institution. Thus, making adjustments to the federal framework would present a constitutional issue. [19]

Structure

Austria's health programs are funded by the sickness insurance fund known as the Krankenkasse, which in 2013 took 11.0% of the GDP, which was above the average of the E.U average of 7.8% of GDP. [20] Austria's healthcare system is decentralized, and operates with a system similar to United States federalism. Each of the nine states and the federal government of Austria have legal limitation and roles in their healthcare system. Federal Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs is the federal aspect, its role is to develop the framework for the services that are offered, and handle the sickness insurance fund known as the Krankenkasse, which funds Austria's healthcare system. The role of the Provinces is to manage and provide the care as needed. [18] The provision of healthcare is ultimately carried out jointly by federal, provincial, and local actors. [4] Since Austria's health program covers a vast array of social insurance including but not limited to unemployment insurance, family benefits, accident insurance, the overall bureaucracy is vast. While the Krankenkasse is the primary fund, Austria social protection network actually implemented by 22 smaller funds, 19 of which are purely for sickness and all of which by public law are self-governed in order to insure decentralization. [5] The funds are also differentiated to allow for effective risk pooling, which is why membership is compulsory and citizens are generally unable to select which fund they will belong to. [4]

Electronic health records

Structure and basic components of the Austrian EHR (ELGA) 20120217 structure of the Austrian electronic health records (ELGA).jpg
Structure and basic components of the Austrian EHR (ELGA)

In December 2012 Austria introduced an Electronic Health Records Act (EHR-Act). [21] These provisions are the legal foundation for a national EHR system based upon a substantial public interest according to Art 8(4) of the Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC. [22]

The Austrian EHR-Act pursues an opt-out approach in order to harmonize the interests of public health and privacy in the best possible manner.

The 4th Part of the Austrian Health Telematics Act 2012 (HTA 2012) – these are the EHR provisions – are one of the most detailed data protection rules within Austrian legislation. Numerous safeguards according to Art 8(4) DPD guarantee a high level of data protection. For example:

See also

Related Research Articles

Health care reform is for the most part governmental policy that affects health care delivery in a given place. Health care reform typically attempts to:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Medicare (Canada)</span> Canadas publicly funded, single-payer health care system

Medicare is an unofficial designation used to refer to the publicly funded single-payer healthcare system of Canada. Canada's health care system consists of 13 provincial and territorial health insurance plans, which provide universal healthcare coverage to Canadian citizens, permanent residents, and depending on the province or territory, certain temporary residents. The systems are individually administered on a provincial or territorial basis, within guidelines set by the federal government. The formal terminology for the insurance system is provided by the Canada Health Act and the health insurance legislation of the individual provinces and territories.

Health insurance or medical insurance is a type of insurance that covers the whole or a part of the risk of a person incurring medical expenses. As with other types of insurance, risk is shared among many individuals. By estimating the overall risk of health risk and health system expenses over the risk pool, an insurer can develop a routine finance structure, such as a monthly premium or payroll tax, to provide the money to pay for the health care benefits specified in the insurance agreement. The benefit is administered by a central organization, such as a government agency, private business, or not-for-profit entity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Healthcare in Canada</span>

Healthcare in Canada is delivered through the provincial and territorial systems of publicly funded health care, informally called Medicare. It is guided by the provisions of the Canada Health Act of 1984, and is universal. The 2002 Royal Commission, known as the Romanow Report, revealed that Canadians consider universal access to publicly funded health services as a "fundamental value that ensures national health care insurance for everyone wherever they live in the country".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Two-tier healthcare</span> Unequal access to higher quality healthcare

Two-tier healthcare is a situation in which a basic government-provided healthcare system provides basic care, and a secondary tier of care exists for those who can pay for additional, better quality or faster access. Most countries have both publicly and privately funded healthcare, but the degree to which it creates a quality differential depends on the way the two systems are managed, funded, and regulated.

Health care in Ireland is delivered through public and private healthcare. The public health care system is governed by the Health Act 2004, which established a new body to be responsible for providing health and personal social services to everyone living in Ireland – the Health Service Executive. The new national health service came into being officially on 1 January 2005; however the new structures are currently in the process of being established as the reform programme continues. In addition to the public-sector, there is also a large private healthcare market.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Healthcare in Switzerland</span>

Switzerland has universal health care, regulated by the Swiss Federal Law on Health Insurance. There are no free state-provided health services, but private health insurance is compulsory for all persons residing in Switzerland.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Healthcare in the United Kingdom</span>

Healthcare in the United Kingdom is a devolved matter, with England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales each having their own systems of publicly funded healthcare, funded by and accountable to separate governments and parliaments, together with smaller private sector and voluntary provision. As a result of each country having different policies and priorities, a variety of differences have developed between these systems since devolution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Health care in Australia</span>

Health care in Australia operates under a shared public-private model underpinned by the Medicare system, the national single-payer funding model. State and territory governments operate public health facilities where eligible patients receive care free of charge. Primary health services, such as GP clinics, are privately owned in most situations, but attract Medicare rebates. Australian citizens, permanent residents, and some visitors and visa holders are eligible for health services under the Medicare system. Individuals are encouraged through tax surcharges to purchase health insurance to cover services offered in the private sector, and further fund health care.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Healthcare in the Netherlands</span>

Healthcare in the Netherlands is differentiated along three dimensions (1) level (2) physical versus mental and (3) short term versus long term care.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Healthcare in Germany</span>

Germany has a universal multi-payer health care system paid for by a combination of statutory health insurance and private health insurance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Health care in Turkey</span>

Healthcare in Turkey consists of a mix of public and private health services. Turkey introduced universal health care in 2003. Known as Universal Health Insurance Genel Sağlık Sigortası, it is funded by a tax surcharge on employers, currently at 5%. Public-sector funding covers approximately 75.2% of health expenditures.

Healthcare in Finland consists of a highly decentralized three-level publicly funded healthcare system and a much smaller private sector. Although the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health has the highest decision-making authority, specific healthcare precincts are responsible for providing healthcare to their residents as of 2023.

The French health care system is one of universal health care largely financed by government national health insurance. In its 2000 assessment of world health care systems, the World Health Organization found that France provided the "best overall health care" in the world. In 2017, France spent 11.3% of GDP on health care, or US$5,370 per capita, a figure higher than the average spent by rich countries, though similar to Germany (10.6%) and Canada (10%), but much less than in the US. Approximately 77% of health expenditures are covered by government-funded agencies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Healthcare in Estonia</span>

Healthcare in Estonia is supervised by the Ministry of Social Affairs and funded by general taxation through the National Health Service.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Health care in Poland</span>

Health care in Poland is insurance based, delivered through a publicly funded health care system called the Narodowy Fundusz Zdrowia, which is free for all the citizens of Poland provided they fall into the "insured" category. According to Article 68 of the Polish Constitution everyone has a right to have access to health care. Citizens are granted equal access to the publicly funded healthcare system. In particular, the government is obliged to provide free health care to young children, pregnant women, disabled people, and the elderly. However, private health care use is very extensive in Poland. Patients who are uninsured have to pay the full cost of medical services. According to a study conducted by CBOS in 2016, out of 84% patients taking part in the survey, 40% declared use of both private and public health services, 37% use only public health care, and 7% use only private health services. 77% of all responders declared using private health care is caused by long waiting for public health care services.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Healthcare in Belgium</span>

Belgium has a universal healthcare system. Healthcare in Belgium is composed of three parts. Firstly, there is a primarily publicly funded healthcare and social security service run by the federal government, which organises and regulates healthcare; independent private/public practitioners, university/semi-private hospitals and care institutions. There are a few private hospitals. Secondly is the insurance coverage provided for patients. Finally, industry coverage; which covers the production and distribution of healthcare products for research and development. The primary aspect of this research is done in universities and hospitals.

Government-guaranteed health care for all citizens of a country, often called universal health care, is a broad concept that has been implemented in several ways. The common denominator for all such programs is some form of government action aimed at broadly extending access to health care and setting minimum standards. Most implement universal health care through legislation, regulation, and taxation. Legislation and regulation direct what care must be provided, to whom, and on what basis.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Healthcare in Liechtenstein</span>

The nation of Liechtenstein has a universal health care system with decentralized, free market elements through mandated health insurance coverage for every person residing in the country.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Healthcare in Egypt</span>

The Egyptian healthcare system is pluralistic, comprising a variety of healthcare providers from the public as well as the private sector. The government ensures basic universal health coverage, although private services are also available for those with the ability to pay. Due to social and economic pressures, Egypt's healthcare system is subject to many challenges. However, several recent efforts have been directed towards enhancing the system.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 Bondi, Susie (September 2009). "Austrian Health Care". Association of Americans Resident Overseas. Archived from the original on August 11, 2011. Retrieved April 2, 2011.
  2. ↑ The Austrian healthcare system Overview of how it works Accessed: 16 October 2011.
  3. 1 2 Austrian agency for international mobility and cooperation in education, science and research: National health insurance Archived 2014-12-29 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved: June 26, 2014.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 "The Austrian Healthcare System: Key Facts" (PDF). Bundesministerium für Gesundheit. Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 July 2019. Retrieved 5 May 2018.
  5. 1 2 3 4 "Entitled to healthcare" (PDF). European Commission. 2013.
  6. 1 2 "Health Insurance". Stadt Wien. Retrieved 5 May 2018.
  7. ↑ "Healthcare in Austria" . Retrieved 5 May 2018.
  8. ↑ "E-Card als Bürgerkarte". Digitales Österreich. Archived from the original on 2 April 2020. Retrieved 5 May 2018.
  9. ↑ "Pressegespräch - Jetzt kommt die e-cardmit Foto". Chipkarte.at. 2 October 2019. Archived from the original on 3 April 2020. Retrieved 11 October 2019.
  10. ↑ "Expenditure on health care". European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. 2011.
  11. 1 2 3 Hofmarcher, Maria M. (2013). Quentin, Wilm (ed.). "Austria: health system review" (PDF). Health Systems in Transition. 15 (7). Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organization: 75–134. PMID   24334772. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2020-04-13. Retrieved 2016-12-03.
  12. ↑ Ballas, Dimitris; Dorling, Danny; Hennig, Benjamin (2017). The Human Atlas of Europe. Bristol: Policy Press. p. 79. ISBN   9781447313540.
  13. ↑ Office of health Economics. "International Comparison of Medicines Usage: Quantitative Analysis" (PDF). Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry. Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 November 2015. Retrieved 2 July 2015.
  14. ↑ "Outcomes in EHCI 2015" (PDF). Health Consumer Powerhouse. 26 January 2016. Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 June 2017. Retrieved 27 January 2016.
  15. 1 2 Czypionka, Thomas; Kraus, Markus; Riedel, Monika; Röhrling, Gerald (2007). Waiting Times for Elective operations in Austria: a Question of Transparency (PDF) (Report). Vienna: Institute for Advanced Studies (IHS). pp. 1–3, 5–9, 11, 18.
  16. ↑ Stepan, Adolf; Sommersguter‐Reichmann, Margit (2005). "Monitoring political decision‐making and its impact in Austria". Health Economics. 14 (Suppl 1): S7–S23. doi:10.1002/hec.1026. PMID   16161199.
  17. ↑ Austria. European Observatory on Health Care Systems
  18. 1 2 "The Health care Systems of the Individual Member States" (PDF). European Parliament. 1998.
  19. 1 2 3 Hofmarcher, Maria (Oct 2014). "The Austrian health reform 2013 is promising but requires continuous political ambition". Health Policy. 118 (1): 8–13. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.09.001 . PMID   25239031.
  20. ↑ "Austria Health Care & Long-Term Care Systems" (PDF). European Commission. 2016.
  21. ↑ Electronic Health Records Act (EHR-Act)
  22. ↑ Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.