Ingimundr (tenth century)

Last updated

Ingimundr's name as it appears on folio 58v of Oxford Jesus College MS 111 (the Red Book of Hergest): "Jgm[?]nd
". Ingimundr (Oxford Bodleian Library MS Jesus College 111, folio 58v).jpg
Ingimundr's name as it appears on folio 58v of Oxford Jesus College MS 111 (the Red Book of Hergest ): "Jgmỽnd".

Ingimundr, [2] also known as Hingamund, [3] Igmunt, [4] Ingimund, [5] was a tenth century Viking warlord. In 902, Irish sources record that the Vikings were driven from Dublin. It is almost certainly in the context of this exodus that Ingimundr appears on record. He is recorded to have led the abortive settlement of Norsemen on Anglesey, before being driven out from there as well. He appears to have then led his folk to the Wirral peninsula, where the English allowed him to settle his followers. Ingimundr's invasion of Anglesey may be the most notable Viking attack in Welsh history.

Contents

Exodus from Ireland, and conflict with the Welsh

The Viking Kingdom of Dublin was established in the mid-ninth century. This maritime realm weakened from infighting in the later part of the century, and following a devastating defeat to a united force from the kingdoms of Brega and Leinster, the Vikings were finally driven from Dublin in 902 [6] specifically, according to the Annals of Ulster, [7] and Chronicon Scotorum , by the Irish. [8] The pseudo-historical Fragmentary Annals of Ireland relates a colourful tale concerning Ingimundr that clearly relates to this expulsion. [9] According to this source, Ingimundr led an exodus of Vikings from Ireland to Anglesey, before they were driven from the island, after which they were settled by the English near Chester. [10]

The Annales Cambriae and Brut y Tywysogyon appear to corroborate the thrust of the aforesaid account of Ingimundr in Wales. [11] According to the former, Ingimundr came to Anglesey and held "Maes Osmeliaun", [12] whilst the Welsh vernacular chronicle reports that Ingimundr held "Maes Ros Meilon". [13] The site itself appears to have been located on the eastern edge of Anglesey, perhaps near Llanfaes if the aforesaid place names are any clue. [14] Another possibility is that Ingimundr was settled near Llanbedrgoch, [15] where evidence of farming, manufacturing, and trading has been excavated. [16] There is reason to suspect that this site formed an aristocratic power centre, and that it may have originated as an informal Viking trading centre just prior to Ingimundr's attempted colonisation. The centre itself could have provided an important staging post between the Welsh and other trading centres in the Irish Sea region. [17] [note 1]

According to the version of events presented in the Fragmentary Annals of Ireland, Ingimundr had been defeated by a son of Cadell ap Rhodri. [20] If correct, this son could have been one of the latter's sons, either Hywel Dda or Clydog. [21] According to the so-called "Nennian" recension of Historia Brittonum , however, Cadell's brother, Anarawd ap Rhodri (died 916), held the kingship of Anglesey in about 908, in addition to his kingship of Gwynedd on the Welsh mainland. [22] The Fragmentary Annals of Ireland, therefore, could well have replaced Anarawd's apparent connection in the ousting of Ingimundr from Anglesey, in favour his more famous nephew, Hywel Dda. [23]

The slaying of Anarawd's brother, Merfyn, about the year after Ingimundr's clash on Anglesey, as revealed by Brenhinedd y Saesson , [24] Brut y Tywysogyon, [25] and Annales Cambriae, [26] may be directly related to Ingimundr's activities along the Welsh coast. [27] Although the former two sources state that Merfyn was put to death by his own men, the latter source identifies his killers as Vikings, and it is possible that confusion concerning the Latin words gentibus and gentilibus are responsible for the discrepancy between the sources. [28]

Settlement in Mercia, and strife against the English

The northern tip of the Wirral peninsula looking west from a position over Liverpool. Liverpool Docks and the Wirral.jpg
The northern tip of the Wirral peninsula looking west from a position over Liverpool.

Following Ingimundr's apparent expulsion from Anglesey, the Fragmentary Annals of Ireland claim that he and his followers settled in Mercian lands around Chester with the consent of Æðelflæd, co-ruler of Mercia (died 918). [29] Although the source itself is of questionable reliability, and there is no English source that corroborates such a grant [30] with this region being within a virtual "blind-spot" as regards its lack of coverage in coetaneous sources [31] some of Æðelflæd's continental contemporaries were certainly involved with strategically settling Vikings in estuarial regions. [32] Furthermore, there is an abundance of place name evidence on the Wirral peninsula, north-west of Chester, that attests to a significant Scandinavian colony in the region. [33] It is almost certain, therefore, that Ingimundr settled his followers on the Wirral between the Dee and Mersey estuaries [34] [note 2] , and struck a deal with Æthelflæd in which he was bound to safeguard the surrounding region from unwelcome Viking activity. [36] In fact, there is a remarkable lack of archaeological evidence of Viking activity in Cheshire, east of the Wirral, which may have bearing upon such an arrangement with the English. [37]

If the Fragmentary Annals of Ireland is to be believed, the Mercians' plans of making use of such settlement may have backfired as Ingimundr later turned against the English, and convinced other leading Vikings to aid him in what was an unsuccessful assault on Chester itself. Although this episode is clearly over-dramatised, [38] the B and C versions of the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle reveal that Æðelflæd restored the Roman defences of Chester in 907, [39] whilst the C version further records the construction of byrig (fortified settlements) at Eddisbury and Runcorn in 914 and 915 respectively. [40] Æðelflæd's restoration of Chester, therefore, may have been undertaken in the face of the threat posed by the significant influx of Scandinavian settlers in the region. Specifically, this restoration could have been undertaken before the apparent attack, [41] or possibly begun as a direct response to such an attack. [42] Æðelflæd's aforesaid restoration and construction projects of Eddisbury and Runcornas well as those of Thelwall (in 919), Manchester (in 919), and Cledemutha (perhaps Rhuddlan; in 921)need not have been initiated as a means to counter the threat of substantial Viking settlement, but could have been undertaken with the Welsh in mind. [43] Whatever the case, the remark by the Fragmentary Annals of Ireland, that Ingimundr convened with the Viking leadership before hostilities were commenced, could conceivably reflect deliberations carried out at the local þing (assembly site) located in Thingwall [44] (a place name derived from the Old Norse þing-vǫllr, "assembly-field"). [45]

At one point the tenth-century Armes Prydein makes reference to a great military alliance of peoples that included Gwyðyl Iwerðon, Mon, a Phrydyn ("Gaels of Ireland, Anglesey, and Pictland"). [46] If this remark represents Gaelic speakers, it could refer to Irish colonists on Anglesey who had arrived as a direct result of Ingimundr's abortive immigration from Ireland, or at least as a consequence of his settlement on the island. [47] The expulsion of the Vikings from Dublin in 902 appears to have resulted in Viking immigration in the Wirral and on Anglesey, but also on Mann, and along the coasts of Cumbria and northern Wales. Although this expansion cannot be solely attributed to the refugees from Dublin, it was their expulsion that appears to have precipitated this new wave of Viking colonisation in the Irish Sea region. [48] The Fragmentary Annals of Ireland asserts that some of Ingimundr's forces in England were Irishmen. In fact, there may well be truth behind this claim as the place name Irby , meaning "farm of the Irish", is found on the Wirral. [49]

Aftermath and Agmund

The Cuerdale Hoard of hack-silver was uncovered in Lancashire about 65 km (40 mi) from Chester, and dates from about the time of Ingimundr's floruit on the British mainland. London - British Museum - 2445.jpg
The Cuerdale Hoard of hack-silver was uncovered in Lancashire about 65 km (40 mi) from Chester, and dates from about the time of Ingimundr's floruit on the British mainland.

Although Ingimundr's settlement on the Wirral appears to be the only specifically documented migration in the wake of the events of 902, his adventure was almost certainly not unique. No doubt other middle-ranking Viking lords settled followers along in the Irish Sea region, in places such as Cumbria, Galloway, Lancashire, and Mann. [51] Although the expulsion of 902 may have led to a brief abatement of violent Viking activity in Ireland, within two decades there was a remarkable resurgence of such activity, and Dublin itself was retaken and restored in 917. [52]

It is possible that Ingimundr is identical to a certain "Agmund hold" who is accounted as one of the slain combatants of the Battle of Tettenhall by the C and D versions of the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, [53] and to the similarly named man who was the eponym of Amounderness. Against this identification is the fact Ingimundr appears to have borne a different personal name than these individuals. [54] In fact, these two Agmunds may well be identical, and their names appear to correspond to the Old Norse Agmundr rather than Ingimundr. [55] [note 3] As on the Wirral, there is an abundance of Scandinavian place names in Amounderness (an area which corresponds to today's administrative districts of Fylde, Wyre, Preston and part of Ribble Valley, Lancashire), and it was in the southern part of this district near Preston where the Cuerdale Hoard was originally deposited. The Scandinavian settlement of this region, like that of the Wirral, was a by-product of the 902 exodus from Ireland. [58]

Notes

  1. One particular archaeological find on Anglesey is that of the arm-rings uncovered at Red Wharf Bay. [18] These objects are likely contemporaneous with the Cuerdale Hoard, and therefore contemporaneous with Ingimundr's occupation of the island. In fact, it is possible that Ingimundr's actions on Anglesey resulted in the original deposit of this hoard, and it's non-recovery. [19]
  2. There is also genetic evidence of Scandinavian settlement on the peninsula. [35]
  3. Amounderness is first recorded in a somewhat dubious early tenth-century charter. [56] Early forms of the name indicate that it originated from the Old Norse *Agmundarnes ("Agmundr's headland"). [57] A variant form of the personal name Agmundr is Ǫgmundr. [56]

Citations

  1. Williams Ab Ithel (1860b) pp. 1819; Jesus College MS. 111 (n.d.); Oxford Jesus College MS. 111 (n.d.).
  2. Griffiths, D (2014); Downham (2013); Ó Cróinín (2013); Richards, JD (2013); Downham (2007); Etchingham (2007); Woolf (2007a); Insley (2005); Oram (2000).
  3. Griffiths, D (2014); Ó Cróinín (2013); Redknap (2008); Downham (2007); Woolf (2007a); Griffiths, DW (1991).
  4. Redknap (2008); Woolf (2007a).
  5. Griffiths, D (2014); Charles-Edwards (2013); Redknap (2008); Hadley (2006); Ó Corráin (2006); Forte; Oram; Pedersen (2005); Pretty (2005); Matthews (2003); Jesch (2000a); Jesch (2000b); Wainwright (2000); Moore (1996); Griffiths, DW (1991).
  6. Insley (2005).
  7. Charles-Edwards (2013) p. 500; The Annals of Ulster (2010) § 902.2; Griffiths, D (2009) p. 179; The Annals of Ulster (2008) § 902.2; Woolf (2007a) p. 131; Hadley (2006) p. 61; Ó Corráin (2001) pp. 2122; Jesch (2000b) p. 2; Griffiths, DW (1991) p. 28.
  8. Charles-Edwards (2013) p. 500; The Annals of Ulster (2012) § 902; Chronicon Scotorum (2010) § 902.
  9. Etchingham (2007) p. 153; Woolf (2007a) p. 131; Wainwright (1948) p. 151.
  10. Griffiths, D (2014) p. 34; Charles-Edwards (2013) p. 502; Downham (2013) p. 150; Ó Cróinín (2013) ch. 9; Fragmentary Annals of Ireland (2010) § 429; Griffiths, D (2009) p. 179; Fragmentary Annals of Ireland (2008) § 429; Redknap (2008) p. 402; Downham (2007) pp. 83, 206208, 256; Etchingham (2007) p. 153; Woolf (2007a) pp. 131132; Hadley (2006) pp. 6162; Matthews (2003) pp. 107108; Jesch (2000b) p. 2; Wainwright (1948).
  11. Griffiths, D (2014) p. 34; Richards, JD (2013) ch. 2; Griffiths, D (2009) p. 179; Woolf (2007a) p. 131; Hadley (2006) pp. 6162; Matthews (2003) p. 108; Jesch (2000b) p. 2; Wainwright (2000) p. 20; Wainwright (1948) pp. 151, 153.
  12. Griffiths, D (2014) p. 34; Charles-Edwards (2013) pp. 328 n. 95, 500, 502; Ó Cróinín (2013) ch. 9; Charles-Edwards (2011) p. 85 n. 10; Griffiths, D (2009) p. 179; Downham (2007) p. 206; Etchingham (2007) p. 153; Woolf (2007a) p. 131; Hadley (2006) p. 62; Jesch (2000b) p. 2; Wainwright (2000) pp. 20, 2324; Moore (1996) p. 28; Griffiths, DW (1991) p. 28; Wainwright (1948) pp. 151, 153; Williams Ab Ithel (1860a) p. 16.
  13. Griffiths, D (2009) p. 179; Downham (2007) pp. 83, 206; Etchingham (2007) p. 153; Hadley (2006) p. 62; Wainwright (2000) pp. 20, 2324; Griffiths, DW (1991) p. 28; Wainwright (1948) p. 151; Williams Ab Ithel (1860b) pp. 1819.
  14. Charles-Edwards (2011) pp. 85 n. 10, 328 n. 95; Pretty (2005) p. 12.
  15. Griffiths, D (2009) p. 179; Downham (2007) p. 83.
  16. Jesch (2000a) p. 15.
  17. Redknap (2008) pp. 406, 408; Richards, J (2005) pp. 8384.
  18. Redknap (2008) p. 405; Richards, J (2005) pp. 8283; Jesch (2000a) p. 15.
  19. Redknap (2008) p. 405; Jesch (2000a) p. 15.
  20. Charles-Edwards (2011) p. 502; Fragmentary Annals of Ireland (2010) § 429; Fragmentary Annals of Ireland (2008) § 429; Downham (2007) pp. 2728, 8384, 206208; Wainwright (1948).
  21. Charles-Edwards (2011) pp. 502, 503.
  22. Charles-Edwards (2011) pp. 476, 502; Woolf (2007b) pp. 102103; Dumville (1982) pp. 1617.
  23. Charles-Edwards (2011) p. 503.
  24. Redknap (2008) p. 402; Downham (2007) p. 209; Jones; Williams; Pughe (1870) p. 656.
  25. Downham (2007) p. 209; Williams Ab Ithel (1860b) pp. 1819.
  26. Redknap (2008) p. 402; Downham (2007) p. 209; Williams Ab Ithel (1860a) p. 16.
  27. Redknap (2008) p. 402; Maund (2000) p. 44.
  28. Downham (2007) p. 209.
  29. Griffiths, D (2014) p. 34; Richards, JD (2013) ch. 25; Charles-Edwards (2011) p. 502; Fragmentary Annals of Ireland (2010) § 429; Fragmentary Annals of Ireland (2008) § 429; Downham (2007) pp. 8384, 207208; Hadley (2006) pp. 6162; Matthews (2003) p. 108; Wainwright (1948).
  30. Downham (2007) pp. 84 n. 132, 208.
  31. Quanrud (2014) p. 83; Woolf (2007a) p. 132.
  32. Downham (2007) pp. 84 n. 132, 208; Matthews (2003) pp. 109112, 114.
  33. Richards, JD (2013) ch. 3; Downham (2007) p. 208; Hadley (2006) p. 62; Jesch (2000b) pp. 23.
  34. Griffiths, D (2014) p. 34.
  35. Bowden; Balaresque; King et al. (2008).
  36. Matthews (2003) pp. 112114.
  37. Matthews (2003) pp. 109, 115.
  38. Griffiths, D (2014) p. 34; Fragmentary Annals of Ireland (2010) § 429; Fragmentary Annals of Ireland (2008) § 429; Downham (2007) pp. 84, 208; Woolf (2007a) p. 132; Matthews (2003) p. 108; Jesch (2000b) p. 6; Wainwright (2000) p. 23; Wainwright (1948).
  39. Griffiths, D (2014) p. 34; Richards, JD (2013) ch. 4; Downham (2007) pp. 84, 208; Woolf (2007a) p. 132; O'Keeffe (2001) p. 75; Swanton (1998) p. 94; Thorpe (1861) p. 182.
  40. Charles-Edwards (2011) p. 502; O'Keeffe (2001) p. 75; Swanton (1998) pp. 9899; Thorpe (1861) p. 187.
  41. Downham (2007) p. 84; Woolf (2007a) p. 132.
  42. Charles-Edwards (2011) pp. 502503; Woolf (2007a) p. 132.
  43. Hadley (2006) p. 62.
  44. Jesch (2000b) p. 6.
  45. Baker; Brookes (2013) p. 205.
  46. Hudson (2014) p. 211; Charles-Edwards (2011) pp. 527528; Koch (2006); Skene (1868) p. 124.
  47. Charles-Edwards (2011) pp. 527528.
  48. Charles-Edwards (2011) p. 500; Ó Corráin (2006) p. 61.
  49. Charles-Edwards (2011) p. 528; Fragmentary Annals of Ireland (2010) § 429; Fragmentary Annals of Ireland (2008) § 429; Wainwright (1948).
  50. Downham (2013) p. 150; Charles-Edwards (2011) p. 502; Downham (2007) pp. 28, 7879, 83, 86; Bean (2000) p. 18.
  51. Griffiths, D (2014) p. 35.
  52. Downham (2007) pp. 3132, 8991; Forte; Oram; Pedersen (2005) p. 92; Insley (2005); Richards, J (2005) p. 78; Larsen (2001) pp. 131; Ó Corráin (2001) pp. 2122.
  53. Quanrud (2014) pp. 7274, 7980; Downham (2007) p. 84; O'Keeffe (2001) p. 73; Swanton (1998) p. 97; Thorpe (1861) pp. 184185.
  54. Downham (2007) p. 84.
  55. Quanrud (2014) p. 82; Downham (2007) p. 84.
  56. 1 2 Bandle; Andersson; Insley (2000).
  57. Bandle; Insley; Andersson (2005); Bandle; Andersson; Insley (2000).
  58. Forte; Oram; Pedersen (2005) pp. 9293; Oram (2000) pp. 12.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eochaid (son of Rhun)</span> King of Strathclyde; and/or King of the Picts

Eochaid was a ninth-century Briton who may have ruled as King of Strathclyde and/or King of the Picts. He was a son of Rhun ab Arthgal, King of Strathclyde, and descended from a long line of British kings. Eochaid's mother is recorded to have been a daughter of Cináed mac Ailpín, King of the Picts. This maternal descent from the royal Alpínid dynasty may well account for the record of Eochaid reigning over the Pictish realm after the death of Cináed's son, Áed, in 878. According to various sources, Áed was slain by Giric, a man of uncertain ancestry, who is also accorded kingship after Áed's demise.

Echmarcach mac Ragnaill was a dominant figure in the eleventh-century Irish Sea region. At his height, he reigned as king over Dublin, the Isles, and perhaps the Rhinns of Galloway. The precise identity of Echmarcach's father, Ragnall, is uncertain. One possibility is that this man was one of two eleventh-century rulers of Waterford. Another possibility is that Echmarcach's father was an early eleventh-century ruler of the Isles. If any of these identifications are correct, Echmarcach may have been a member of the Uí Ímair kindred.

The Battle of Corbridge took place on the banks of the River Tyne near the village of Corbridge in Northumberland in the year 918.

Sitric Cáech or Sihtric Cáech or Sigtrygg Gále, was a Hiberno-Scandinavian Viking leader who ruled Dublin and then Viking Northumbria in the early 10th century. He was a grandson of Ímar and a member of the Uí Ímair. Sitric was most probably among those Vikings expelled from Dublin in 902, whereafter he may have ruled territory in the eastern Danelaw in England. In 917, he and his kinsman Ragnall ua Ímair sailed separate fleets to Ireland where they won several battles against local kings. Sitric successfully recaptured Dublin and established himself as king, while Ragnall returned to England to become King of Northumbria. In 919, Sitric won a victory at the Battle of Islandbridge over a coalition of local Irish kings who aimed to expel the Uí Ímair from Ireland. Six Irish kings were killed in the battle, including Niall Glúndub, overking of the Northern Uí Néill and High King of Ireland.

Arthgal ap Dyfnwal was a ninth-century king of Alt Clut. He descended from a long line of rulers of the British Kingdom of Alt Clut. Either he or his father, Dyfnwal ap Rhydderch, King of Alt Clut, may have reigned when the Britons are recorded to have burned the Pictish ecclesiastical site of Dunblane in 849.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rhun ab Arthgal</span> King of Strathclyde

Rhun ab Arthgal was a ninth-century King of Strathclyde. He is the only known son of Arthgal ap Dyfnwal, King of Alt Clut. In 870, during the latter's reign, the fortress of Alt Clut was captured by Vikings, after which Arthgal and his family may have been amongst the mass of prisoners taken back to Ireland. Two years later Arthgal is recorded to have been slain at the behest of Causantín mac Cináeda, King of the Picts. The circumstances surrounding this regicide are unknown. The fact that Rhun seems to have been Causantín's brother-in-law could account for Causantín's interference in the kingship of Alt Clut.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Flann Sinna</span> High King of Ireland

Flann mac Máel Sechnaill, better known as Flann Sinna, was the son of Máel Sechnaill mac Máele Ruanaid of Clann Cholmáin, the leading branch of the Southern Uí Néill. He was King of Mide from 877 onwards and a High King of Ireland. His mother Land ingen Dúngaile was a sister of Cerball mac Dúnlainge, King of Osraige.

Cerball mac Dúnlainge was king of Ossory in south-east Ireland. The kingdom of Ossory (Osraige) occupied roughly the area of modern County Kilkenny and western County Laois and lay between the larger provincial kingdoms of Munster and Leinster.

Amlaíb Conung was a Viking leader in Ireland and Scotland in the mid-late ninth century. He was the son of the king of Lochlann, identified in the non-contemporary Fragmentary Annals of Ireland as Gofraid, and brother of Auisle and Ímar, the latter of whom founded the Uí Ímair dynasty, and whose descendants would go on to dominate the Irish Sea region for several centuries. Another Viking leader, Halfdan Ragnarsson, is considered by some scholars to be another brother. The Irish Annals title Amlaíb, Ímar and Auisle "kings of the foreigners". Modern scholars use the title "kings of Dublin" after the Viking settlement which formed the base of their power. The epithet "Conung" is derived from the Old Norse konungr and simply means "king". Some scholars consider Amlaíb to be identical to Olaf the White, a Viking sea-king who features in the Landnámabók and other Icelandic sagas.

Ragnall mac Bárid ua Ímair or Rægnald was a Viking leader who ruled Northumbria and the Isle of Man in the early 10th century. He was a grandson of Ímar and a member of the Uí Ímair. Ragnall was most probably among those Vikings expelled from Dublin in 902, whereafter he may have ruled territory in southern Scotland or the Isle of Man. In 917, he and his kinsman Sitric Cáech sailed separate fleets to Ireland where they won several battles against local kings. Sitric successfully recaptured Dublin and established himself as king, while Ragnall returned to England. He fought against Constantín mac Áeda, King of Scotland, in the Battle of Corbridge in 918, and although the battle was not decisive it did allow Ragnall to establish himself as king at York.

Gofraid ua Ímair or Guthfrith of Ivar was a Hiberno-Scandinavian and Viking leader who ruled Dublin and briefly Viking Northumbria in the early 10th century. He was a grandson of Ímar and a member of the Uí Ímair. Gofraid was most probably among those Vikings expelled from Dublin in 902, whereafter he helped his kinsman Ragnall conquer Northumbria. Another kinsman, Sitric Cáech, became ruler of Dublin around the same time. Ragnall died in 920, and so the following year Sitric left Dublin to rule in Northumbria, and Gofraid succeeded Sitric as ruler of Dublin. Sitric's early reign was marked by raids he conducted against the Gaelic (Native-Irish), including one at Armagh.

Auisle or Óisle was a Viking leader in Ireland and Scotland in the mid-late ninth century. He was the son of the king of Lochlann, identified in the non-contemporary Fragmentary Annals of Ireland as Gofraid, and brother of Amlaíb Conung and Ímar, the latter of whom founded the Uí Ímair dynasty, and whose descendants would go on to dominate the Irish Sea region for several centuries. Another Viking leader, Halfdan Ragnarsson, is sometimes considered a brother. The Irish Annals title Auisle, Ímar and Amlaíb "kings of the foreigners". Modern scholars use the title "kings of Dublin" after the Viking settlement which formed the base of their power.

Maccus mac Arailt, or Maccus Haraldsson, was a tenth-century King of the Isles. Although his parentage is uncertain, surviving evidence suggests that he was the son of Harald Sigtryggson, also known as Aralt mac Sitriuc, the Hiberno-Norse King of Limerick. Maccus' family is known as the Meic Arailt kindred. He and his brother, Gofraid, are first recorded in the 970s. It was during this decade and the next that they conducted military operations against the Welsh of Anglesey, apparently taking advantage of dynastic strife within the Kingdom of Gwynedd.

Ímar, synonymous with Ivar the Boneless, was a powerful Viking leader in Ireland and Scotland in the mid-late ninth century. He was the progenitor of the Uí Ímair dynasty, who would go on to dominate the Irish Sea region for several centuries. He was the son of the king of Lochlann, identified in the non-contemporary Fragmentary Annals of Ireland as Gofraid. The Fragmentary Annals name Auisle and Amlaíb Conung as his brothers. Another Viking leader, Halfdan Ragnarsson, is considered by some scholars to be another brother. The Irish Annals title Amlaíb, Ímar and Auisle "kings of the foreigners". Modern scholars use the title "Kings of Dublin" after the Viking settlement which formed the base of their power. Some scholars consider Ímar to be identical to Ivar the Boneless, a Viking commander of the Great Heathen Army named in contemporary English sources who also appears in the Icelandic sagas as the eldest son of the legendary Viking Ragnar Lodbrok by third wife Aslaug.

Ragnall mac Gofraid was King of the Isles and likely a member of the Uí Ímair kindred. He was a son of Gofraid mac Arailt, King of the Isles. Ragnall and Gofraid flourished at a time when the Kingdom of the Isles seems to have suffered from Orcadian encroachment at the hands of Sigurðr Hlǫðvisson, Earl of Orkney. Gofraid died in 989. Although Ragnall is accorded the kingship upon his own death in 1004 or 1005, the succession after his father's death is uncertain.

Gofraid, King of Lochlann was a key figure in the emergence of Norse influence in Scotland and one of the early Kings of the Isles and of that dominated the Irish Sea and environs in the Early Middle Ages. Very little is known of him, including his origins and the nature of his kingdom, although his descendants are well attested in the Irish annals. Speculative connections between these historical figures and characters from the Norse sagas have also been made.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ímar mac Arailt</span> King of Dublin

Ímar mac Arailt was an eleventh-century ruler of the Kingdom of Dublin and perhaps the Kingdom of the Isles. He was the son of a man named Aralt, and appears to have been a grandson of Amlaíb Cuarán, King of Northumbria and Dublin. Such a relationship would have meant that Ímar was a member of the Uí Ímair, and that he was a nephew of Amlaíb Cuarán's son, Sitriuc mac Amlaíb, King of Dublin, a man driven from Dublin by Echmarcach mac Ragnaill in 1036.

Bárid mac Ímar ; Old Norse: Bárðr or Bárǫðr ; d. 881) was a ninth-century King of Dublin. He was a son of Ivar (Ímar) Ragnarsson and a member of the Uí Ímair.

Ímar mac Bárid ; also known as Ivar II, was a Norse-Gaelic King of Dublin. He was a grandson of Ivar Gudrødsson and a member of the powerful Uí Ímair.

Tomrair was a ninth-century Viking active in Ireland. He is one of the first Vikings recorded by Irish sources. Tomrair is reported to have been killed at the Battle of Sciath Nechtain, a conflict in which twelve hundred Vikings were slain, battling the combined forces of Ólchobar mac Cináeda, King of Munster and Lorcán mac Cellaig, King of Leinster, in 848.

References

Primary sources

Secondary sources