Judiciary of Uruguay

Last updated

The judiciary of Uruguay is a branch of the government of Uruguay that interprets and applies the laws of Uruguay, to ensure equal justice under law, and to provide a mechanism for dispute resolution. The legal system of Uruguay is a civil law system, with public law based on the 1967 Constitution, amended in 1989, 1994, 1997, and 2004. The Constitution declares Uruguay to be a democratic republic, [1] and separates the government into three equal branches, executive, legislative and judicial. [2] Private relationships are subject to the Uruguayan Civil Code, originally published in 1868. [3] The Constitution defines the judiciary as a hierarchical system courts, with the highest court being a five-member Supreme Court, who are appointed by the legislative branch of the government, for ten-year terms. [4] [5] The Supreme Court appoints the judges of most of the lower courts. [5] Below the Supreme Court, there are sixteen courts of appeal, each of which has three judges. Seven of the courts of appeal specialize in civil matters, four specialize in criminal matters, three cover labour law, and two focus on family matters. [6] At the lowest tier are justices of the peace and courts of first instance specialized in administrative, civil, criminal, customs, juvenile, and labour cases. [6] Although the hierarchy, all of them are functionally and structurally impartial, that is, the tribunal should not be interested in the object of the particular case, and the higher tribunal does not impose a behaviour nor precedent to the lower ones. [7] There are also separate courts for auditing, elections and the military. [4]

Contents

Elections in Uruguay are organized and supervised by a permanent and independent Electoral Court, which was established by an electoral law that was drafted in 1924, and was included in the 1932 constitution. [8] : 6  The court has nine members of which five are non-partisan members elected by the parliament, the General Assembly of Uruguay. [8] : 123  The other four members represent the major political parties in the General Assembly and are each selected by the legislators of their own parties. Below the Electoral Court are nineteen departmental electoral boards. [8] : 123 

The Judiciary of Uruguay is possibly the most independent in Latin America, [9] : 83  in part due to having its own budget. [10] However, between 1977 and 1985, the military government severely curtailed the independence of the judiciary, [9] : 85  [11] by placing the judiciary under a justice ministry. [12] Between 1905 and 1977, and from 1989 onwards, the selection of judges involved the legislature rather than the executive branch of government. [9] : 86  Since 1997, it has been possible for Supreme Court judges to be re-elected after a gap of five years but only up to the age of 70. [9] : 85 

Structure

The judiciary of Uruguay consists of the Supreme Court of Justice, the Courts of Appeals, the District Courts (or Lawyer Courts), the Departmental Peace Courts and the Sectional Peace Courts. It also includes Conciliation Courts, Mediation Centers, [13] and dependencies such as Public Defender Office and Forensic Technical Institute.

Supreme Court of Justice

This section is an excerpt from Supreme Court of Uruguay.[ edit ]
Palacio Piria, seat of the Supreme Court Suprema Corte de Justicia.JPG
Palacio Piria, seat of the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court of Uruguay (Spanish: Suprema Corte de Justicia de Uruguay) is the highest court of law and last resort in the Oriental Republic of Uruguay. It serves as the highest appeals court, and appoints and oversees all other judges. Established on 28 October 1907, it is housed in the Palacio Piria, a masterpiece of eclectic architecture from 1917. [14]

Article 235 of the Constitution establishes that the members of the Supreme Court of Justice must be at least 40 years old, be natural-born citizens (or be legal citizens with ten years exercise thereof and twenty-five years of residence in the country), and have been a lawyer for ten years, or as such to have been a member of the Judiciary, the Public or Fiscal Ministry for a period of eight years. [15] Article 236 establishes shall be appointed by the General Assembly by a two-thirds vote of its full membership. [16] Also, the term-length will be ten years and they may not be re-elected until after a period of five years following the previous term. Additionally, the position shall cease when they reach the age of seventy years. [16]

Courts of Appeals

The Courts of Appeals (Spanish : Tribunales de Apelaciones) are collective bodies made up of three members each one, called "Ministers". Their basic legal framework is found in the XV section of the Constitution about the Judiciary and the III section of the Law no. 15750 (Organic Law of the Judiciary and the Courts Organization). [17] They are not created by the Constitution itself but its existence is preempted by the article 241, which leaves their creation to a law. [13]

To be a Minister of a Court of Appeals the person should be at least of 35 years of age, to have active natural citizenship or active legal citizenship for at least seven years, and to be a lawyer with eight years of experience or to have been a judge or a prosecutor for six years. [18] The Supreme Court of Justice has the power to appoint, with the approval of the Senate or the Permanent Commission, the members of the Courts of Appeals by three out of five for candidates who are members of the Judiciary or the Office of the Attorney General, or four out of five for other candidates. [13]

The Constitution does not determine the number of Courts of Appeals, but each individual Court has been created by law. There are Courts of Appeals for Civil, Family, Labour and Criminal subject matters. Civil Courts of Appeals deal with civil, trade, finance, customs and administrative contentious issues. Family Courts of Appeals deal with family and minors. All Courts of Appeals have jurisdiction over the whole territory of the Republic, and they act as a second instance court, reviewing judicial decision of the lower tier courts (District Courts), being their rulings absolutely final, though their decisions are subject to the remedy of cassation before the Supreme Court of Justice. [17]

District Courts

The District Courts, or First Instance Lawyer Courts (Spanish : Juzgados Letrados de Primera Instancia), are first instance courts that can be grouped in two categories: District Courts of Montevideo and those of the Interior of the country (other than Montevideo). District Courts of Montevideo are of Civil, Criminal, Organized Crime Specialized Criminal, Labour, Contentious Administrative, Family, Specialized Family, Customs, Juvenile, Bankruptcy, and Criminal Surveillance subject matters, whose jurisdiction is within Montevideo Department. District Courts in the Interior, on the other hand, are organized according their territorial jurisdiction, for example District Court of First Instance of Bella Unión for the First Turn or the District Court of First Instance of Rivera for the Seventh Turn, but these have usually assigned jurisdiction under several subject matters. They are not created by the Constitution itself but its existence is preempted by the article 244. [19]

In order to be a judge of a District Court, of Montevideo or in the Interior, a person needs to be at least of 28 years of age, to have active natural citizenship or an active legal citizenship for at least four years, and to be a lawyer with four years of experience or to have been a judge of the peace or a prosecutor for two years. [20]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of Hong Kong</span> Law courts in the special administrative region of China

The Judiciary of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region is the judicial branch of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Under the Basic Law of Hong Kong, it exercises the judicial power of the Region and is independent of the executive and legislative branches of the Government. The courts in Hong Kong hear and adjudicate all prosecutions and civil disputes, including all public and private law matters.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Law of Brazil</span> Law system of Brazil

The law of Brazil is based on statutes and, partly and more recently, a mechanism called súmulas vinculantes. It derives mainly from the civil law systems of European countries, particularly Portugal, the Napoleonic Code and the Germanic law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme court</span> Highest court in a jurisdiction

In most legal jurisdictions, a supreme court, also known as a court of last resort, apex court, and highcourt of appeal, is the highest court within the hierarchy of courts. Broadly speaking, the decisions of a supreme court are not subject to further review by any other court. Supreme courts typically function primarily as appellate courts, hearing appeals from decisions of lower trial courts, or from intermediate-level appellate courts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of Pakistan</span> Hierarchical system with two classes of courts

The judiciary of Pakistan is a hierarchical system with two classes of courts: the superior judiciary and the subordinate judiciary. The superior judiciary is composed of the Supreme Court of Pakistan, the Federal Shariat Court and five High Courts, with the Supreme Court at the apex. There is a High Court for each of the four provinces as well as a High Court for the Islamabad Capital Territory. The Constitution of Pakistan entrusts the superior judiciary with the obligation to preserve, protect and defend the constitution. Neither the Supreme Court nor a High Court may exercise jurisdiction in relation to Tribal Areas, except otherwise provided for. The disputed regions of Azad Kashmir and Gilgit–Baltistan have separate court systems.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of Portugal</span> Overview of court system in Portugal

The judiciary of Portugal is a system of courts that together constitute one of the four organs of Sovereignty as defined by the Portuguese Constitution. The courts are independent from the other three Portuguese organs of Sovereignty.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of Spain</span> Highest court in Spain

The Supreme Court is the highest court in the Kingdom of Spain. Originally established pursuant to Title V of the Constitution of 1812 to replace —in all matters that affected justice— the System of Councils, and currently regulated by Title VI of the Constitution of 1978, it has original jurisdiction over cases against high-ranking officials of the Kingdom and over cases regarding illegalization of political parties. It also has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all cases. The Court has the power of judicial review, except for the judicial revision on constitutional matters, reserved to the Constitutional Court.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of Colombia</span>

The judiciary of Colombia is a branch of the State of Colombia that interprets and applies the laws of Colombia, to ensure equal justice under law, and to provide a mechanism for dispute resolution. The judiciary comprises a hierarchical system of courts presided over by judges, magistrates and other adjudicators.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of Chile</span>

The judiciary of the Republic of Chile includes one Supreme Court, one Constitutional Court, 16 Courts of Appeal, 84 Oral Criminal Tribunals and Guarantee Judges; 7 Military Tribunals; over 300 Local Police Courts; and many other specialized Tribunals and courts in matter of family, labor, customs, taxes, electoral affairs, etc.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of Spain</span>

The Judiciary of Spain consists of Courts and Tribunals, composed of judges and magistrates (Justices), who have the power to administer justice in the name of the King of Spain.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of Brazil</span> Public entities designated by the Brazilian constitution

The Judiciary of Brazil is the group of public entities designated by the Brazilian constitution to carry out the country's judicial functions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of Italy</span> Overview of Italian judiciary

The judiciary of Italy is a system of courts that interpret and apply the law in the Italian Republic. In Italy, judges are public officials and, since they exercise one of the sovereign powers of the State, only Italian citizens are eligible for judgeship. In order to become a judge, applicants must obtain a degree of higher education as well as pass written and oral examinations. However, most training and experience is gained through the judicial organization itself. The potential candidates then work their way up from the bottom through promotions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federal government of Brazil</span> Executive authority of Brazil

The Federal Government of Brazil is the national government of the Federative Republic of Brazil, a republic in South America divided into 26 states and a federal district. The Brazilian federal government is divided into three branches: the executive, which is headed by the President and the cabinet; the legislative, whose powers are vested by the Constitution in the National Congress; and the judiciary, whose powers are vested in nine organs, including the Supreme Federal Court and lower federal courts. The seat of the federal government is located in Brasília.

The Judiciary of Puerto Rico is defined under the Constitution of Puerto Rico and consists of the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, Court of Appeals, and the Court of First Instance consisting of the Superior Courts and the Municipal Courts.

The Judiciary of Sri Lanka are the civil and criminal courts responsible for the administration of justice in Sri Lanka. The Constitution of Sri Lanka defines courts as independent institutions within the traditional framework of checks and balances. They apply Sri Lankan Law which is an amalgam of English common law, Roman-Dutch civil law and Customary Law; and are established under the Judicature Act No 02 of 1978 of the Parliament of Sri Lanka.

The law of Cyprus is a legal system which applies within the Republic of Cyprus. Although Cypriot law is extensively codified, it is still heavily based on English common law in the sense that the fundamental principle of precedent applies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of Cyprus</span>

The Judiciary of Cyprus is the system of courts which interprets and applies the law in Cyprus. It is largely based on the English model. Judicial independence is safeguarded by the Constitution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of the Dominican Republic</span>

The Supreme Court of the Dominican Republic is the highest court existing in the Republic and is, therefore, the head of the judiciary in the country.

The judiciary of the Philippines consists of the Supreme Court, which is established in the Constitution, and three levels of lower courts, which are established through law by the Congress of the Philippines. The Supreme Court has expansive powers, able to overrule political and administrative decisions, and with the ability to craft rules and law without precedent. It further determines the rules of procedure for lower courts, and its members sit on electoral tribunals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mariana Mota</span> Uruguayan judge

Mariana Mota is a Uruguayan judge. She served as a judge on the Criminal Court of First Instance in the 7th district of the city of Montevideo, where she was investigating more than 50 complaints of human rights violations linked to the civil-military dictatorship. In 2010 she condemned former president and dictator Juan María Bordaberry for crimes of attack against the Constitution, forced disappearance of persons, and political murder. She was transferred to a civil court in 2013 by order of the Supreme Court of Justice, which caused a controversy regarding the possible reasons for this transfer, and generated various demonstrations of rejection by human rights organizations. She was appointed to the board of directors of the National Institute of Human Rights on 1 August 2017.

The Judiciary of Mexico officially the Judicial Power of the Federation is one of the three branches of government in Mexico, and the sole federal judiciary power. It is composed of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation, which serves as its highest court, the Federal Judiciary Council, the Federal Electoral Tribunal, regional courts, circuit and appellate collegiate courts, and district courts.

References

  1. ↑ "Constitution of the Republic". Parliament of Uruguay (in Spanish). §4. Archived from the original on 16 December 2013. Retrieved 17 December 2013.
  2. ↑ "Constitution of the Republic". Parliament of Uruguay (in Spanish). §§5, 9 and 15. Archived from the original on 16 December 2013. Retrieved 17 December 2013.
  3. ↑ "Código Civil" (in Spanish). Parliament of Uruguay. Archived from the original on 13 December 2013. Retrieved 17 December 2013.
  4. 1 2 "Constitution of the Republic". Parliament of Uruguay (in Spanish). §15. Archived from the original on 16 December 2013. Retrieved 17 December 2013.
  5. 1 2 Leslie Jermyn and Winnie Wong (2010). Uruguay. Marshall Cavendish. p. 36. ISBN   9780761444824 . Retrieved 17 December 2013.
  6. 1 2 "Juzgados y tribunales" (in Spanish). Judiciary of Uruguay. Retrieved 17 December 2013.
  7. ↑ Abal, Alejandro (January 2008). Derecho Procesal (in Spanish). Vol. I. Montevideo: Fundación de Cultura Universitaria. pp. 29–30.
  8. 1 2 3 Chad Vickery, ed. (2011). Guidelines for Understanding, Adjudicating, and Resolving Disputes in Elections. International Foundation for Electoral Systems. ISBN   9781931459624 . Retrieved 17 December 2013.
  9. 1 2 3 4 Juan Carlos Calleros-Alarcón (2009). The Unfinished Transition to Democracy in Latin America. Routledge. ISBN   978-0203888360 . Retrieved 17 December 2013.
  10. ↑ Eduardo Lora, ed. (2007). The State of State Reform in Latin America. Inter-American Development Bank and Stanford University Press. p. 104. ISBN   978-0821365755.
  11. ↑ Edy Kaufmann (1979). Uruguay in Transition: From Civilian to Military Rule. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction, Inc. p. 118. ISBN   9781412840842 . Retrieved 17 December 2013.
  12. ↑ "La República Independiente" (in Spanish). Judiciary of Uruguay. Retrieved 17 December 2013.
  13. 1 2 3 Abal Oliú 2008, pp. 263–268
  14. ↑ Palacio Piria Archived 1 April 2009 at the Wayback Machine
  15. ↑ "SECCION XV – DEL PODER JUDICIAL – CAPITULO II, Artículo 235".
  16. 1 2 "Uruguay's Constitution of 1966, Reinstated in 1985, with Amendments through 2004" (PDF).
  17. 1 2 Tarigo 2010, pp. 188–192
  18. ↑ Abal Oliú 2008, pp. 259–263
  19. ↑ Abal Oliú 2008 , pp. 227–230
  20. ↑ Abal Oliú 2008 , pp. 236

Bibliography

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.