Water supply and sanitation in Uruguay

Last updated
Uruguay: Water and Sanitation
Flag of Uruguay.svg
Data
Water coverage (broad definition)100%
Sanitation coverage (broad definition)100%
Continuity of supply (%)100%
Average urban water use (liter/capita/day)183
Average urban water and sewer billUS$ 22/month (2007)
Share of household metering93%
Share of collected wastewater treatedn/a
Annual investment in water supply and sanitationn/a
Share of self-financing by utilitiesnil
Share of tax-financingn/a
Share of external financingn/a
Institutions
Decentralization to municipalitiesNo
National water and sanitation companyYes
Water and sanitation regulatorYes, multi-sector
Responsibility for policy settingMinistry of Housing, Land Management and Environment
Sector lawNo
Number of urban service providers1
Number of rural service providersn/a

Uruguay is the only country in Latin America that has achieved quasi-universal coverage of access to safe drinking water supply [1] and adequate sanitation. [2] Water service quality is considered good, with practically all localities in Uruguay receiving disinfected water on a continuous basis. 70% of wastewater collected by the national utility was treated. Given these achievements, the government's priority is to improve the efficiency of services and to expand access to sewerage, where appropriate, in areas where on-site sanitation is used.

Contents

The stability of the water supply in Uruguay was severely challenged by a three year drought culminating in a water crises in 2022-2023. [3] The La Niña driven cycle of drought, amplified by increased heatwaves caused by climate change meant that overuse of water by consumers stressed capacity of the system, leading to use of saltwater in drinking water. [3] [4]

Access

Water and sanitation coverage in Uruguay (2004)

Urban (93% of the population)Rural (7% of the population)Total
WaterBroad definition100%100%100%
House connections97%84%96%
SanitationBroad definition100%99%100%
Sewerage81%42%78%

Source: WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP/2006). Data for water and sanitation based on the WHO World Health Survey (2003).

Water use

Per capita water production is high at 411 liter/capita/day (90.4 Imperial gallons/c/d, 108.6 US gallons/c/d). Even after taking into account non-revenue water of 54%, at 183 liter/capita/day (40.3 Imperial gallons/c/d, 48.3 US gallons/c/d) it is still higher than in many European countries. However, water use is much lower than in neighboring Argentina, where metering is not widespread, while in Uruguay 96% of water connections were metered in 2004. [5]

History and recent developments

Source: CIA World Factbook Uruguay mapa.png
Source: CIA World Factbook

Like many other developing countries Uruguay sought private sector participation in water supply and sanitation to improve efficiency and service quality. This was done through two concessions for secondary cities in the department of Maldonado, home to many tourist resorts and the town Punta del Este. The first concession was granted in 1993 to Aguas de la Costa, a Uruguayan firm which later became majority-owned by Aguas de Barcelona, itself a subsidiary of the French firm Suez. The second concession was granted in 2000 to URAGUA, a subsidiary of Aguas de Bilboa of Spain.

To complement the policy of private sector participation, the government created in 2002 the utility regulatory agency URSEA covering the power and water sector.

Nevertheless, the private concessions remained contentious. Following a vigorous campaign against them and allegations of overcharging and poor service quality, Parliament passed a constitutional amendment in October 2004 prohibiting any form of private sector participation in the water sector. As a result, the concession of URAGUA was withdrawn in the same year. [6]

In 2005 the government passed law 17.930 with the objective of improving the effective participation of users and civil society in planning, management and control of activities in the sector. For that purpose the law established a water and sanitation directorate (DINASA) in the Ministry of Housing and Environment, as well as a Water and Sanitation Advisory Commission (COASAS).

Meanwhile, the Uruguayan and foreign owners of Aguas de la Costa refused to yield to demands for nationalization. In 2006 the government bought the shares held by Aguas de Barcelona. From then on the enterprise operated as a mixed public-private enterprise with a majority public shareholding. [7] In 2009 the company became 100% owned by the state. [8]

2022-2023 crises

This section is an excerpt from 2022-2023 Uruguay drought.[ edit ]
Canelon Grande Dam during the drought. Represa de Canelon Grande seca durante la sequia.jpg
Canelón Grande Dam during the drought.
Protests in May 2023 in Montevideo due to the situation of increased salinity in drinking water caused by low freshwater reserves. 2do dia de movilizaciones bajo la consigna "No es sequia, es saqueo". Montevideo, 2023.jpg
Protests in May 2023 in Montevideo due to the situation of increased salinity in drinking water caused by low freshwater reserves.

The drought or water crises in Uruguay from 2022 to 2023 has been attributed to the La Niña phenomenon, [9] which was further exacerbated by the effects of climate change, including rising temperatures. [10] [11] The crises resulted in significant impacts on the local economy, and large portions of the population not having access to clean, drinkable water.

While the drought began in 2018, [12] the situation significantly deteriorated in early 2023, [13] affecting more than 60% of Uruguay's territory with extreme or severe drought conditions between October 2022 and February 2023. [14] Precipitation during this period was below average. [15] This prolonged drought led to agricultural losses exceeding $1 billion [16] and complications in the availability of drinking water. [17] By the end of January 2023, before the water crisis in the metropolitan area, the drought had already impacted 75,000 people across five departments in the country's interior. [18] [19]

To address this crisis, the national government declared a state of agricultural emergency in October 2022, extending until the end of April 2023. [20] [21] The drought resulted in reduced access to drinking water and financial losses for agricultural producers. [22] [23] [ citation needed ] Following a lack of reduction of water usage and a lack of projected rainfall, the national water management authority started using saltwater in municipal water supply for 60% of the population in May 2023. [24] [25] The water had twice the level of salinity recommend by WHO. [24] [25]

Responsibility for water supply and sanitation

The state-owned national utility, Administración de las Obras Sanitarias del Estado (OSE) provides water and sewer services to all of Uruguay with the exception of Montevideo, where the municipality provides sewerage and OSE provides water services only. OSE serves 330 localities with 2.8 million inhabitants with water services and 152 localities with 0.5 million inhabitants with sewer services. It had 4,362 employees in 2004.

To enhance sector performance, new institutions have been recently established, including the Regulatory Entity for Energy and Water (URSEA); the National Directorate of Water and Sanitation (DINASA) in the Ministry of Housing, Land Management and Environment, responsible for creating national sector policies on WSS; and the Advisory Commission on Water and Sanitation (COASAS).

The government of Uruguay intends to establish a comprehensive legal and regulatory framework for the water supply and sanitation sector through a new law. It also plans to develop a policy on appropriate sanitation standards and to further improve the efficiency of OSE by stimulating internal competition and reducing unaccounted for water. Concerning internal competition, OSE has introduced an internal benchmarking system comparing the utility's performance across 21 cities based on 9 service quality indicators.

Economic efficiency

Between 1999 and 2005 OSE successfully increased labor productivity from 5.6 employees/1000 connections to 4.5, decreased operating costs from US$0.98/m3 (US$0.75/cu yd) to US$0.71/m3 (US$0.54/cu yd); and increased operating margins from 35% to 42%. However, OSE's performance continues to present areas of inefficiency. Reducing unaccounted for water, which remains around 54%, will continue to require a concerted effort.

Financial aspects

Tariffs and affordability

Water and sewer tariffs charged by OSE differ depending on the category of users, with lower tariffs for residential users than for other users (commercial, industrial, official and public enterprises). Water and sewer tariffs in Uruguay have increased substantially since 1995. For example, a typical residential water bill (20 m3/month, 700 cu ft/month) for OSE consumers increased from the equivalent of 56 pesos/month (US$9.50) in 1995 to 207 pesos/month (US$18.20) in 2001, a 93% increase in US dollar terms in six years. Tariffs were further increased so that a typical residential bill reached 431 pesos/month in 2003. But due to the massive devaluation of 2001 the US dollar equivalent of the monthly bill decreased to US$15/month. [26] In 2007 a monthly residential water bill was estimated to be at least 568 pesos, equivalent to more than US$22/month. [27]

Given that the average monthly income of a household in the two lowest-income quintiles (a lower-middle income family) was about the equivalent of US$190 in 2003, water and sewer tariffs accounted for almost 8% of their income, an extraordinarily high percentage, which has probably further increased since then. [28]

Spending of OSE per capita from 1990 to 2005 in constant US dollars of 2006 Investment in WSS in Uruguay per capita 1990-2005.png
Spending of OSE per capita from 1990 to 2005 in constant US dollars of 2006

Investments and financing

The national water and sewer company Administración de las Obras Sanitarias del Estado (OSE), created in 1952, does not receive direct subsidies from the government. [30] OSE finances its investments from internal revenues and loans. However, OSE's financial health had been in decline during the 1990s and early 2000 due to high levels of operational inefficiency, thereby threatening OSE's ability to carry out future required investments. OSE's operating performance and financial health have since begun improving.

The total expenditure of OSE between 1990 and 2005 was US$797 million, which is on annual average 0.24% of the Uruguayan GDP or US$15.3 per capita. The annual investment was highest at the end of the 1990s, reaching US$30.8 in 1996 and US$31.2 per capita in 1999. Since 2001, it fell back to only US$5.1 per capita in 2003. [31] The average annual investment per capita between 1997 and 2003 was higher than in other Latin American countries like Argentina, Peru, Colombia and Mexico. [32]

External support

World Bank

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Water supply and sanitation in Latin America</span>

Water supply and sanitation in Latin America is characterized by insufficient access and in many cases by poor service quality, with detrimental impacts on public health. Water and sanitation services are provided by a vast array of mostly local service providers under an often fragmented policy and regulatory framework. Financing of water and sanitation remains a serious challenge.

Water supply and sanitation in Mexico is characterized by achievements and challenges. Among the achievements is a significant increase in access to piped water supply in urban areas as well as in rural areas between 1990 and 2010. Additionally, a strong nationwide increase in access to improved sanitation was observed in the same period. Other achievements include the existence of a functioning national system to finance water and sanitation infrastructure with a National Water Commission as its apex institution; and the existence of a few well-performing utilities such as Aguas y Drenaje de Monterrey.

Drinking water supply and sanitation in Ecuador is characterized by a number of achievements and challenges. One key achievement is a significant increase in both access to an at least basic water source and at least basic sanitation. Significant increases in coverage in urban areas were achieved both by the public utility EMAAP-Q, serving the capital Quito, and the private concessionaire Interagua in the country's largest city Guayaquil. However, municipalities rely overwhelmingly upon central government investment, rather than recouping the costs at a local level. Another problem is intermittent water supply, which affects half of the urban areas. Also, only 8% of all collected wastewater is being treated. The level of non-revenue water is estimated at 65%, one of the highest in Latin America. Addressing these challenges is complicated by the atomization of the sector: A multitude of stakeholders – the Ministry of Housing, the Emergency Social Investment Fund, the Solidarity Fund, the State Bank, NGOs, municipalities and others – intervene in the sector. Despite the existence of an Interinstitutional Committee for Water and Sanitation there remains room to improve coordination.

Water supply and sanitation in Colombia have been improved in many ways over the past decades. Between 1990 and 2010, access to improved sanitation increased from 67% to 82%, but access to improved water sources increased only slightly from 89% to 94%. In particular, coverage in rural areas lags behind. Furthermore, despite improvements, the quality of water and sanitation services remains inadequate. For example, only 73% of those receiving public services receive water of potable quality and in 2006 only 25% of the wastewater generated in the country underwent any kind of treatment.

Access to drinking water and sanitation in El Salvador has been increased significantly. A 2015 conducted study by the University of North Carolina called El Salvador the country that has achieved the greatest progress in the world in terms of increased access to water supply and sanitation and the reduction of inequity in access between urban and rural areas. However, water resources are heavily polluted and the great majority of wastewater is discharged without any treatment into the environment. Institutionally a single public institution is both de facto in charge of setting sector policy and of being the main service provider. Attempts at reforming and modernizing the sector through new laws have not borne fruit over the past 20 years.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Water supply and sanitation in Chile</span> Municipal water infrastructure in Chile

Water supply and sanitation in Chile were once considered efficient and equitable but have recently struggled to reliably provide water throughout the country. Chile's water resources have been strained by the Chilean water crisis, which was partially caused by a continuing mega drought that began in 2010, along with an increased demand for agricultural and other commercial interests.

Drinking water supply and sanitation coverage in Honduras has increased significantly in the last decades. However, the sector is still characterized by poor service quality and poor efficiency in many places. Coverage gaps still remain, particularly in rural areas.

Drinking water and sanitation in Nicaragua are provided by a national public utility in urban areas and water committees in rural areas. Despite relatively high levels of investment, access to drinking water in urban areas has barely kept up with population growth, access to urban sanitation has actually declined and service quality remains poor. However, a substantial increase in access to water supply and sanitation has been reached in rural areas.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Water supply and sanitation in Argentina</span>

Drinking water supply and sanitation in Argentina is characterized by relatively low tariffs, mostly reasonable service quality, low levels of metering and high levels of consumption for those with access to services. At the same time, according to the WHO, 21% of the total population remains without access to house connections and 52% of the urban population do not have access to sewerage. The responsibility for operating and maintaining water and sanitation services rests with 19 provincial water and sewer companies, more than 100 municipalities and more than 950 cooperatives, the latter operating primarily in small towns. Among the largest water and sewer companies are Agua y Saneamientos Argentinos (AYSA) and Aguas Bonarenses S.A. (ABSA), both operating in Greater Buenos Aires, Aguas Provinciales de Santa Fe, and Aguas Cordobesas SA, all of them now publicly owned. In 2008 there were still a few private concessions, such as Aguas de Salta SA, which is majority-owned by Argentine investors, and Obras Sanitarias de Mendoza (OSM).

Bolivia's drinking water and sanitation coverage has greatly improved since 1990 due to a considerable increase in sectoral investment. However, the country continues to suffer from what happens to be the continent's lowest coverage levels and from low quality of services. Political and institutional instability have contributed to the weakening of the sector's institutions at the national and local levels. Two concessions to foreign private companies in two of the three largest cities—Cochabamba and La Paz/El Alto—were prematurely ended in 2000 and 2006 respectively. The country's second largest city, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, relatively successfully manages its own water and sanitation system by way of cooperatives. The government of Evo Morales intends to strengthen citizen participation within the sector. Increasing coverage requires a substantial increase of investment financing.

Water supply and sanitation in Venezuela is currently limited and many poor people remain without access to piped water. Service quality for those with access is mixed, with water often being supplied only on an intermittent basis and most wastewater not being treated. Non-revenue water is estimated to be high at 62%, compared to the regional average of 40%. The sector remains centralized despite a decentralization process initiated in the 1990s that has now been stalled. Within the executive, sector policies are determined by the Ministry of Environment. The national water company HIDROVEN serves about 80% of the population.

The water and sanitation sector in Peru has made important advances in the last two decades, including the increase of water coverage from 30% to 85% between 1980 and 2010. Sanitation coverage has also increased from 9% to 37% from 1985 to 2010 in rural areas. Advances have also been achieved concerning the disinfection of drinking water and in sewage treatment. Nevertheless, many challenges remain, such as:

Costa Rica has made significant progress in the past decade in expanding access to water supply and sanitation, but the sector faces key challenges in low sanitation connections, poor service quality, and low cost recovery.

The Dominican Republic has achieved impressive increases in access to water supply and sanitation over the past two decades. However, the quality of water supply and sanitation services remains poor, despite the country's high economic growth during the 1990s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Obras Sanitarias del Estado</span>

The National Administration of State Sanitary Works (OSE) is the state-owned Uruguayan Water Utilities company.

The drinking water supply and sanitation sector in Guatemala is characterized by low and inconsistent service coverage, especially in rural areas; unclear allocation of management responsibilities; and little or no regulation and monitoring of service provision.

Water supply and sanitation in Cuba is characterized by a high level of access. A state-owned enterprise is in charge of providing services throughout the country within the country's socialist, centrally planned Cuban economic system. As a surprising exception in a Socialist country, a mixed public-private company with partial foreign ownership provides services in parts of Havana.

Water supply and sanitation in Spain is characterized by universal access and good service quality, while tariffs are among the lowest in the EU. Almost half of the population is served by private or mixed private-public water companies, which operate under concession contracts with municipalities. The largest of the private water companies, with a market share of about 50% of the private concessions, is Aguas de Barcelona (Agbar). However, the large cities are all served by public companies except Barcelona and Valencia. The largest public company is Canal de Isabel II, which serves the metropolitan area of Madrid.

The debate about water supply and sanitation in Mendoza has been dominated by the controversial private concession for the provincial water company OSM granted in 1998 to a consortium led by Enron. While the concession improved water and sanitation services, it failed to meet all its specified targets. After the collapse of Enron the concession was overtaken by Argentine investors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Water supply and sanitation in Morocco</span>

Water supply and sanitation in Morocco is provided by a wide array of utilities. They range from private companies in the largest city, Casablanca, the capital, Rabat, Tangier, and Tetouan, to public municipal utilities in 13 other cities, as well as a national electricity and water company (ONEE). The latter is in charge of bulk water supply to the aforementioned utilities, water distribution in about 500 small towns, as well as sewerage and wastewater treatment in 60 of these towns.

References

  1. ↑ Joint Monitoring Program for Water Supply and Sanitation (JMP) Uruguay Water Supply
  2. ↑ Joint Monitoring Program for Water Supply and Sanitation (JMP) Uruguay Sanitation)
  3. 1 2 Simon, Maite Fernández (2023-05-30). "Uruguay, hot and dry, adds salt water to public drinking supply". Washington Post. ISSN   0190-8286 . Retrieved 2023-06-05.
  4. ↑ Atalayar (2023-02-23). "Climate change is not responsible for drought in Argentina, Uruguay and Chile, but it does exacerbate water scarcity". Atalayar. Retrieved 2023-06-05.
  5. ↑ OSE:Benchmarking
  6. ↑ Radio Mundo Real (broken link)
  7. ↑ (in Spanish) Amigos de la Tierra Uruguay: Suez se retira de Uruguay; el gobierno sigue jugando al filo de la Constitución, 17 February 2006
  8. ↑ (in Spanish) OSE Noticias: Cumplimento de Reforma Constitucional - OSE toma el control del cien por cien de los servicios de agua potable, 3 November 2009
  9. ↑ "La Niña: el fenómeno detrás del déficit hídrico de Uruguay y la región". EL PAIS. 2023-02-14. Retrieved 2023-02-16.
  10. ↑ "La crisis climática impulsa las altas temperaturas, pero no la sequía en Argentina y Uruguay". Infobae (in Spanish). 2023-02-16. Retrieved 2023-02-16.
  11. ↑ Camila Méndez (2023-02-21). "Sequía en Uruguay y Argentina no fue causada por el cambio climático, aunque las altas temperaturas sí empeoraron los impactos". la diaria (in Spanish). Retrieved 2023-02-28.
  12. ↑ "Uruguay: Droughts - January 2023, DREF Application (MDRUY004) - Uruguay | ReliefWeb". reliefweb.int. Retrieved 2023-02-16.
  13. ↑ "Uruguay: Drought - Jan 2023 | ReliefWeb". reliefweb.int. Retrieved 2023-02-13.
  14. ↑ "Agricultural emergency, triggered by drought, extended for another 90 days in Uruguay". MercoPress. Retrieved 2023-02-13.
  15. ↑ authors, TW The Watchers- (2023-02-03). "Uruguay's agricultural emergency persists as drought conditions intensify in 2023". The Watchers. Retrieved 2023-02-13.
  16. ↑ "Drought causes over $1bn production losses in Uruguay - Agriculture News Network". 2023-02-03. Retrieved 2023-06-28.
  17. ↑ "Drought in Uruguay complicates drinking water supply - Prensa Latina". 2023-02-10. Retrieved 2023-02-13.
  18. ↑ "Uruguay: Drought - Jan 2023 | ReliefWeb". reliefweb.int. Retrieved 2023-02-13.
  19. ↑ authors, TW The Watchers- (2023-02-03). "Uruguay's agricultural emergency persists as drought conditions intensify in 2023". The Watchers. Retrieved 2023-02-13.
  20. ↑ "Uruguay: Drought - Jan 2023 | ReliefWeb". reliefweb.int. Retrieved 2023-02-13.
  21. ↑ "Agricultural emergency, triggered by drought, extended for another 90 days in Uruguay". MercoPress. Retrieved 2023-02-13.
  22. ↑ authors, TW The Watchers- (2023-02-03). "Uruguay's agricultural emergency persists as drought conditions intensify in 2023". The Watchers. Retrieved 2023-02-13.
  23. ↑ "Drought in Uruguay complicates drinking water supply - Prensa Latina". 2023-02-10. Retrieved 2023-02-13.
  24. 1 2 "Salt Water Comes Out Of The Taps In Uruguay". nationworldnews.com. 2023-05-17. Retrieved 2023-07-03.
  25. 1 2 Millward, David (2023-05-30). "Uruguay's tap water becomes too difficult to swallow". The Telegraph. ISSN   0307-1235 . Retrieved 2023-07-03.
  26. ↑ Peso water bills are from (in Spanish) Asociación de Entes Reguladores de Agua Potable y Saneamiento de las Américas (ADERASA): Las tarifas de agua potable y alcantarillado en América Latina, p. 66; historic exchange rates to calculate US dollar tariff equivalents are from www.oanda.org
  27. ↑ Calculated based on OSE tariffs assuming the smallest connection (11mm, 0.43 in) and a unit tariff of 13.07 peso/m3, which applies for consumption below 20 m3/month (700 cu ft/month), according to (in Spanish) URSEA: OSE 2004 tariffs
  28. ↑ income from (in Spanish) Asociación de Entes Reguladores de Agua Potable y Saneamiento de las Américas (ADERASA) Las tarifas de agua potable y alcantarillado en América Latina, p. 70
  29. ↑ Source: Obras Sanitarias del Estado; Data on population and deflators: World Bank World Development Indicators database
  30. ↑ (in Spanish) Organización Mundial de Salud (OMS): Evaluación de los Servicios de Agua Potable y Saneamiento 2000 en las América, Chapter 3.2
  31. ↑ All figures in constant 2006 US dollars
  32. ↑ See: Investment in water supply and sanitation in Latin America .


This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.