Laurence Tribe

Last updated

Laurence Tribe
Larry Tribe in 2019.png
Tribe in 2019
Born
Laurence Henry Tribe

(1941-10-10) October 10, 1941 (age 83)
Shanghai, China
Awards American Philosophical Society’s Henry M. Phillips Prize in Jurisprudence (2013) [1]
Academic background
Education Harvard University (BA, JD)
Influences

The following is a list of cases Tribe has argued in the Supreme Court, as of the end of 2005:

CaseCitationYear
Richmond Newspapers v. Virginia 448 U.S. 555 1980
Heffron v. International Society for Krishna Consciousness 452 U.S. 640 1981
Crawford v. Board of Education 458 U.S. 527 1982
Larkin v. Grendel’s Den, Inc. 459 U.S. 116 1982
White v. Massachusetts Council 460 U.S. 204 1983
Pacific Gas & Electric v. California 461 U.S. 190 1983
Hawaii Housing Auth. v. Midkiff 467 U.S. 229 1984
Northeast Bancorp v. Fed. Reserve 472 U.S. 159 1985
National Gay Task Force v. Board of Education 470 U.S. 159 1985
Fisher v. City of Berkeley 475 U.S. 260 1986
Bowers v. Hardwick 478 U.S. 186 1986
Pennzoil v. Texaco 481 U.S. 1 1986
Schweiker v. Chilicky 487 U.S. 412 1988
Granfinanciera v. Nordberg 492 U.S. 33 1989
Sable Communications v. FCC 492 U.S. 115 1989
Adams Fruit v. Barrett 494 U.S. 638 1990
Rust v. Sullivan 500 U.S. 173 1991
Cipollone v. Liggett 505 U.S. 504 1992
TXO v. Alliance Resources 509 U.S. 443 1993
Honda Motor Co. v. Oberg 512 U.S. 415 1994
U.S. v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone 516 U.S. 415 1996
Timmons v. Twin Cities Area New Party 520 U.S. 351 1997
Vacco v. Quill 521 U.S. 793 1997
Amchem Products v. Windsor 521 U.S. 591 1997
Baker v. General Motors 522 U.S. 222 1998
AT&T v. Iowa Utilities Board 525 U.S. 366 1999
Ortiz v. Fibreboard 527 U.S. 815 1999
Bush v. Palm Beach County Canvassing Board 531 U.S. 70 2000
New York Times Co. v. Tasini 533 U.S. 438 2001
U.S. v. United Foods 533 U.S. 405 2001
FCC v. NextWave 537 U.S. 293 2002
State Farm v. Campbell 538 U.S. 408 2003
Nike v. Kasky 539 U.S. 654 2003
Johanns v. Livestock Marketing Association 544 U.S. 550 2005

Tribe has argued 26 cases in the U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals:[ citation needed ]

CaseCitationCircuitYear
Worldwide Church of God v. California 623 F.2d 613 [ permanent dead link ‍]9th1980
Grendel's Den v. Goodwin 662 F.2d 102 1st1981
Pacific Legal Foundation v. State Energy Resources 659 F.2d 903 [ permanent dead link ‍]9th1981
United States v. Sun Myung Moon 718 F.2d 12102nd1983
Romany v. Colegio de Abogados742 F.2d 321st1984
Westmoreland v. CBS752 F.2d 162nd1984
Colombrito v. Kelly 764 F.2d 122 2nd1985
Texaco v. Pennzoil 784 F.2d 1133 2nd1986
U.S. v. Bank of New England 821 F.2d 844 1st1987
U.S. v. Gallo 859 F.2d 1078 2nd1988
U.S. v. GAF Corporation884 F.2d 6702nd1989
U.S. v. Western Electric Company900 F.2d 283D.C.1999
Fineman v. Armstrong World Industries980 F.2d 171D.C.1992
U.S. v. Western Electric Company993 F.2d 1572D.C.1993
Lightning Lube v. Witco Corporation4 F.3d 11533rd1993
Hopkins v. Dow Corning Corporation33 F.3d 11169th1994
Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone v. U.S.42 F.3d 1814th1994
Georgine v. Amchem Products, Inc. 83 F.3d 610 3rd1996
BellSouth Corp. v. F.C.C. 144 F.3d 58 D.C.1998
SBC Communications v. F.C.C. 154 F.3d 226 5th1998
City of Dallas v. F.C.C. F.3d 341 5th1999
U.S. West v. Tristani "182 F.3d 1202" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on September 20, 2008. (90.5 KB)10th1999
U.S. West v. F.C.C. "182 F.3d 1224" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on September 20, 2008. (220 KB)10th1999
Southwest Voter Registration v. Shelley "344 F.3d 914" (PDF). (23.0 KB)9th2003
Pacific Gas and Elec. v. California "350 F.3d 932" (PDF). (144 KB)9th2003
General Electric v. E.P.A. "360 F.3d 188" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on November 27, 2007. (49.8 KB)D.C.2004

Selected works

Books

Articles

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Impeachment</span> Process for charging a public official with legal offenses by the legislature(s)

Impeachment is a process by which a legislative body or other legally constituted tribunal initiates charges against a public official for misconduct. It may be understood as a unique process involving both political and legal elements.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution</span> 1868 amendment addressing citizenship rights and civil and political liberties

The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution was adopted on July 9, 1868, as one of the Reconstruction Amendments. Usually considered one of the most consequential amendments, it addresses citizenship rights and equal protection under the law and was proposed in response to issues related to formerly enslaved Americans following the American Civil War. The amendment was bitterly contested, particularly by the states of the defeated Confederacy, which were forced to ratify it in order to regain representation in Congress. The amendment, particularly its first section, is one of the most litigated parts of the Constitution, forming the basis for landmark Supreme Court decisions such as Brown v. Board of Education (1954) regarding racial segregation, Loving v. Virginia (1967) regarding interracial marriage, Roe v. Wade (1973) regarding abortion, Bush v. Gore (2000) regarding the 2000 presidential election, Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) regarding same-sex marriage, and Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard (2023) regarding race-based college admissions. The amendment limits the actions of all state and local officials, and also those acting on behalf of such officials.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of the United States</span> Highest court of jurisdiction in the US

The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is the highest court in the federal judiciary of the United States. It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all U.S. federal court cases, and over state court cases that turn on questions of U.S. constitutional or federal law. It also has original jurisdiction over a narrow range of cases, specifically "all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party." In 1803, the Court asserted itself the power of judicial review, the ability to invalidate a statute for violating a provision of the Constitution via the landmark case Marbury v Madison. It is also able to strike down presidential directives for violating either the Constitution or statutory law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federalist Society</span> American conservative legal organization

The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies (FedSoc) is an American conservative and libertarian legal organization that advocates for a textualist and originalist interpretation of the U.S. Constitution. Headquartered in Washington, D.C., it has chapters at more than 200 law schools and features student, lawyer, and faculty divisions; the lawyers division comprises more than 70,000 practicing attorneys in ninety cities. Through speaking events, lectures, and other activities, it provides a forum for legal experts of opposing conservative views to interact with members of the legal profession, the judiciary, and the legal academy. It is one of the most influential legal organizations in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stephen Breyer</span> US Supreme Court justice from 1994 to 2022

Stephen Gerald Breyer is an American lawyer and jurist who served as an associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court from 1994 until his retirement in 2022. He was nominated by President Bill Clinton, and replaced retiring justice Harry Blackmun. Breyer was generally associated with the liberal wing of the Court. He is now the Byrne Professor of Administrative Law and Process at Harvard Law School.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Noah Feldman</span> American academic, educator, political writer (born 1970)

Noah Raam Feldman is an American legal scholar and academic. He is the Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and chairman of the Harvard Society of Fellows. He is the author of 10 books, host of the podcast Deep Background, and a public affairs columnist for Bloomberg Opinion. He was formerly a contributing writer for The New York Times.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jonathan Turley</span> American attorney and commentator

Jonathan Turley is an American attorney, legal scholar, writer, commentator, and legal analyst in broadcast and print journalism. A professor at George Washington University Law School, he has testified in United States congressional proceedings about constitutional and statutory issues. He has also testified in multiple impeachment hearings and removal trials in Congress, including the impeachment of President Bill Clinton and both the first and second impeachments of President Donald Trump. Turley is a First Amendment advocate and writes frequently on free speech restrictions in the private and public sectors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">J. Michael Luttig</span> American jurist (born 1954)

John Michael Luttig is an American lawyer and jurist who served as a U.S. circuit judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1991 to 2006. Luttig resigned his judgeship in 2006 to become the general counsel of Boeing, a position he held until 2019.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Roberts</span> Chief Justice of the United States since 2005

John Glover Roberts Jr. is an American jurist serving since 2005 as the 17th chief justice of the United States. He has been described as having a moderate conservative judicial philosophy, though he is primarily an institutionalist. Regarded as a swing vote in some cases, Roberts has presided over an ideological shift toward conservative jurisprudence on the high court, in which he has authored key opinions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mark Tushnet</span> American constitutional law scholar (born 1945)

Mark Victor Tushnet is an American legal scholar. He specializes in constitutional law and theory, including comparative constitutional law, and is currently the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Law at Harvard Law School. Tushnet is identified with the critical legal studies movement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alan Dershowitz</span> American lawyer and author (born 1938)

Alan Morton Dershowitz is an American lawyer and law professor known for his work in U.S. constitutional law and American criminal law. From 1964 to 2013, he taught at Harvard Law School, where he was appointed as the Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law in 1993. Dershowitz is a regular media contributor, political commentator, and legal analyst.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Neal Katyal</span> American lawyer and academic (born 1970)

Neal Kumar Katyal is an American lawyer and legal scholar. He is a partner at the Hogan Lovells law firm and is the Paul and Patricia Saunders Professor of National Security Law at Georgetown University Law Center.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Neil Gorsuch</span> US Supreme Court justice since 2017 (born 1967)

Neil McGill Gorsuch is an American jurist who serves as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. He was nominated by President Donald Trump on January 31, 2017, and has served since April 10, 2017.

Nixon v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 731 (1982), was a United States Supreme Court decision written by Justice Lewis Powell dealing with presidential immunity from civil liability for actions taken while in office. The Court found that a president "is entitled to absolute immunity from damages liability predicated on his official acts."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pamela S. Karlan</span> American legal scholar (born 1959)

Pamela Susan Karlan is an American legal scholar who was the principal deputy assistant attorney general in the Civil Rights Division of the United States Department of Justice from February 8, 2021, until July 1, 2022. She is a professor at Stanford Law School. A leading legal scholar on voting rights and constitutional law, she previously served as U.S. Deputy Assistant Attorney General for Voting Rights in the DOJ's Civil Rights Division from 2014 to 2015.

Michael J. Gerhardt is the Samuel Ashe Distinguished Professor of Constitutional Law at the University of North Carolina School of Law in Chapel Hill. He is also the director of the Center on Law and Government at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and is an expert on constitutional law, separation of powers, and the legislative process. He is a Scholar in Residence at the National Constitution Center and visiting scholar at the University of Pennsylvania Law School. On December 2, 2019, it was announced that Gerhardt would testify before the House Judiciary Committee regarding the constitutional grounds for presidential impeachment in the impeachment inquiry against Donald Trump.

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. Trump was a case brought before the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The plaintiffs, watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), hotel and restaurant owner Eric Goode, an association of restaurants known as ROC United, and an Embassy Row hotel event booker named Jill Phaneuf alleged that the defendant, President Donald Trump, was in violation of the Foreign Emoluments Clause, a constitutional provision that bars the president or any other federal official from taking gifts or payments from foreign governments. CREW filed its complaint on January 23, 2017, shortly after Trump was inaugurated as president. An amended complaint, adding the hotel and restaurant industry plaintiffs, was filed on April 18, 2017. A second amended complaint was filed on May 10, 2017. CREW was represented by several prominent lawyers and legal scholars in the case.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">William Baude</span> American legal scholar

William Patrick Baude is an American legal scholar who specializes in U.S. constitutional law. He currently serves as the Harry Kalven Jr. Professor of Law at the University of Chicago Law School and is the director of its Constitutional Law Institute. He is a scholar of constitutional law and originalism.

Federal pardons in the United States are granted only by the U.S. president, pursuant to their authority under the U.S. Constitution to grant "reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States". Pardons extend to all federal criminal offenses, except in cases of impeachment, and entail various forms of clemency, including commuting or postponing a sentence, remitting a fine or restitution, delaying the imposition of a punishment, and providing amnesty to an entire group or class of individuals.

Presidential immunity is the concept that a sitting president of the United States has both civil and criminal immunity for their official acts. Neither civil nor criminal immunity is explicitly granted in the Constitution or any federal statute.

References

  1. ↑ "Tribe to receive Henry M. Phillips Prize in Jurisprudence". Archived from the original on December 8, 2015. Retrieved May 21, 2020.
  2. 1 2 3 Schoenberg, Shira (November 14, 2007). "Law expert: Obama will preserve Constitution". Concord Monitor. Archived from the original on July 22, 2012.
  3. ↑ Bronner, Ethan (June 28, 2012). "A Re-Examination of Roberts's Legacy?". The New York Times . Archived from the original on July 1, 2012. Retrieved June 28, 2012.
  4. ↑ Davenport, Coral (April 6, 2015). "Laurence Tribe Fights Climate Case Against Star Pupil From Harvard, President Obama". The New York Times . Archived from the original on July 30, 2017. Retrieved February 19, 2017.
  5. ↑ Melber, Ari (March 28, 2016). "Harvard Law School's Laurence Tribe Talks Merrick Garland, Supreme Court Fight". NBCNews . Retrieved September 8, 2021.
  6. ↑ Pilkington, Ed (August 19, 2023). "'It baffles me': what drew a mild lawyer with a liberal past into Trump's election plot?". The Guardian . Retrieved December 3, 2024.
  7. 1 2 Kenneth Jost (May 1990). "Roe Revisited (ABA Review)". ABA Journal. American Bar Association. pp. 110–. Archived from the original on May 8, 2019. Retrieved October 2, 2015.
  8. ↑ Gregory, Vanessa (December 6, 2010) Indefensible Archived June 14, 2011, at the Wayback Machine , The American Prospect
  9. 1 2 Johnson, Carrie (February 26, 2010). "Prominent Harvard law professor joins Justice Department". The Washington Post . Archived from the original on February 27, 2012. Retrieved April 6, 2012. Tribe has served as lead counsel in 35 cases before the U.S. Supreme Court, testified before Congress dozens of times and wrote a major treatise on constitutional law.
  10. ↑ "APS Member History". search.amphilsoc.org. Retrieved April 21, 2021.
  11. ↑ Sullivan, Kathleen M (2007). Legal scholarship symposium: the scholarship of Laurence Tribe. University of Tulsa College Of Law. Retrieved April 10, 2015.
  12. 1 2 "Laurence Tribe on Background". Big Think. January 15, 2008. Archived from the original on June 21, 2015. Retrieved March 20, 2015.
  13. ↑ Bhayani, Paras D. (October 18, 2006). "A Humble Start on the Path to Stardom". The Harvard Crimson. Archived from the original on October 6, 2012. Retrieved April 15, 2012.
  14. 1 2 Carlton Sherwood, Inquisition: The Persecution and Prosecution of the Reverend Sun Myung Moon , Regnery Publishing, 1991, 0-89526-532-X, pages 384-386
  15. 1 2 Pazzanese, Christina (June 24, 2020). "Laurence Tribe Speaks on His Career in Constitutional Law". Harvard Gazette. Retrieved January 11, 2021.
  16. ↑ Benjamin Nugent (May 13, 2008). American Nerd: The Story of My People. Simon and Schuster. p. 104. ISBN   9781416565512. Archived from the original on June 11, 2016. Retrieved October 2, 2015.
  17. ↑ "2002 Dedication - Laurence H. Tribe". New York University School of Law. Archived from the original on October 2, 2015. Retrieved October 1, 2015.
  18. ↑ Blumenkranz, Carla (September 22, 2008). "Radical Speak Performance Artist Mark Tribe Breathes New Life Into Old Politics". New York. 41. New York Magazine Company: 66.
  19. ↑ "Columbia Announces 2013 Honorary Degree Recipients". Columbia University. April 8, 2013. Archived from the original on March 10, 2015.
  20. ↑ "How Barack Obama Amazed His Harvard Law Professor". The Fiscal Times. Retrieved January 13, 2021.
  21. 1 2 3 "Opinion | Laurence Tribe says Trump should be impeached again — even if a Senate conviction is unlikely". Washington Post. Retrieved January 12, 2021.
  22. ↑ Laurence Tribe discusses John Roberts' Supreme Court on YouTube
  23. ↑ Levenson, Michael (October 1, 2019). "Adam Schiff, who steered clear of Harvard Law drama, now at the center of impeachment inquiry". Boston Globe. Archived from the original on December 31, 2019.
  24. ↑ "Laurence Tribe speaks on his career in constitutional law". Harvard Gazette. June 24, 2020. Retrieved January 13, 2021.
  25. ↑ Levy, Richard E. (2006). The Power to Legislate. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 192. ISBN   9780313086328. Archived from the original on May 8, 2019. Retrieved January 2, 2017.
  26. ↑ Epps, Garrett (March 15, 2001). To An Unknown God: Religious Freedom On Trial . St. Martin's Press. pp.  79–. ISBN   9780312262396 . Retrieved October 2, 2015.
  27. ↑ Goldstein, Tom; Lieberman, Jethro K. (December 14, 2002). The Lawyer's Guide to Writing Well: Second Edition. University of California Press. pp. 81–. ISBN   9780520929074. Archived from the original on May 8, 2019. Retrieved October 2, 2015.
  28. 1 2 Blount, Jackie M. (2005). Fit to Teach: Same-Sex Desire, Gender, and School Work in the Twentieth Century. SUNY Press. pp. 160–. ISBN   9780791462676. Archived from the original on May 8, 2019. Retrieved October 2, 2015.
  29. 1 2 3 Bronner, Ethan (2007). Battle for Justice: How the Bork Nomination Shook America. Union Square Press. pp. 266–. ISBN   9781402752278. Archived from the original on May 9, 2019. Retrieved October 2, 2015.
  30. ↑ "Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc". Oyez. Archived from the original on August 18, 2018. Retrieved June 12, 2019.
  31. 1 2 3 Toobin, Jeffrey (October 1, 2002). Too Close to Call: The Thirty-Six-Day Battle to Decide the 2000 Election. Random House. pp. 100–. ISBN   9780375761072. Archived from the original on May 8, 2019. Retrieved October 3, 2015.
  32. 1 2 3 Tim Wu (May 6, 2015). "Did Laurence Tribe Sell Out?". The New Yorker . Archived from the original on September 30, 2015. Retrieved October 3, 2015.
  33. ↑ Mayberry, Jodine (February 26, 2009). "GE Loses Last Issue in Lengthy Court Case on Superfund Liability". Findlaw.com. Archived from the original on May 28, 2009. Retrieved April 21, 2015.
  34. ↑ Davenport, Coral (March 19, 2015). "McConnell urges states to help thwart Obama's war on coal". The New York Times. Archived from the original on February 23, 2017. Retrieved February 19, 2017.
  35. ↑ Freeman, Jody; Lazarus, Richard J. (March 18, 2015). "Is the President's Climate Plan Unconstitutional?". Harvard Law Today. Archived from the original on April 2, 2015. Retrieved March 23, 2015.
  36. ↑ "Larry Tribe and Mitch McConnell's Flagrant Constitutional Error". Politico Magazine. March 25, 2015. Archived from the original on April 18, 2015. Retrieved April 23, 2015.
  37. ↑ Ortutay, Barbara (May 3, 2021). "A decision on suspended Trump Facebook account this week". Associated Press . Retrieved May 22, 2022.
  38. ↑ "'Personhood' Redefined: Animal Rights Strategy Gets at the Essence of Being Human", Association of American Medical Colleges. Retrieved April 10, 2011.
  39. ↑ Egelko, Bob (October 20, 2008). "Next president will shape Supreme Court". San Francisco Chronicle . Archived from the original on May 8, 2009. Retrieved July 16, 2020.
  40. ↑ "Tribe named Senior Counselor for Access to Justice". Harvard Law School. February 26, 2010. Archived from the original on June 4, 2011. Retrieved February 26, 2010.
  41. ↑ "Laurence Tribe to return to Harvard Law School in January". Harvard Law School. November 18, 2010. Archived from the original on April 15, 2012. Retrieved April 15, 2012.
  42. ↑ Cheney, Kyle (December 5, 2016). "Lessig, lawyers to offer support to anti-Trump electors". Politico . Archived from the original on December 20, 2016. Retrieved December 15, 2016.
  43. 1 2 Laurence H. Tribe (May 13, 2017). "Trump must be impeached. Here's why". The Washington Post . Archived from the original on May 14, 2017. Retrieved May 15, 2017.
  44. ↑ Boot, Max (April 25, 2018). "The political center is fighting back". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on May 8, 2019.
  45. ↑ Bottum, Joseph (October 4, 2004). "The Big Mahatma". The Weekly Standard . Archived from the original on May 26, 2010. Retrieved May 11, 2010.
  46. ↑ Rimer, Sara (November 24, 2004). "When Plagiarism's Shadow Falls on Admired Scholars". The New York Times. Archived from the original on October 7, 2013. Retrieved May 11, 2010.
  47. ↑ Pope, Justin (April 14, 2005). "Harvard Reprimands Law Professor Over Book". Associated Press. Archived from the original on April 20, 2005. Retrieved May 11, 2010.
  48. 1 2 3 "2 Professors Walk Into a Dumpster Fire ..." The Chronicle of Higher Education. June 20, 2017. Archived from the original on December 7, 2017. Retrieved December 7, 2017.
  49. 1 2 "Why Is A Top Harvard Law Professor Sharing Anti-Trump Conspiracy Theories?". BuzzFeed. Archived from the original on December 5, 2017. Retrieved December 7, 2017.
  50. 1 2 Coppins, McKay. "How the Left Lost Its Mind". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on December 23, 2017. Retrieved December 7, 2017.
  51. ↑ Haberman, Maggie; Savage, Charlie; Broadwater, Luke (August 8, 2023). "Previously Secret Memo Laid Out Strategy for Trump to Overturn Biden's Win - The House Jan. 6 committee's investigation did not uncover the memo, whose existence first came to light in last week's indictment". The New York Times . Archived from the original on August 9, 2023. Retrieved August 10, 2023.
  52. ↑ Luttig, J. Michael; Tribe, Laurence H. (August 19, 2023). "The Constitution Prohibits Trump From Ever Being President Again - The only question is whether American citizens today can uphold that commitment". The Atlantic . Archived from the original on August 20, 2023. Retrieved August 20, 2023.
  53. ↑ Beauchamp, Zack (August 11, 2023). "The constitutional case that Donald Trump is already banned from being president". Vox. Retrieved August 11, 2023.
  54. ↑ "Conservative Case Emerges to Disqualify Trump for Role on Jan. 6". August 10, 2023. Retrieved August 11, 2023.
  55. ↑ Nichols, John (August 4, 2023). "The Biggest Threat to Donald Trump Could Be the Constitution Itself". ISSN   0027-8378 . Retrieved August 11, 2023.

Bibliography

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.