Michael Graziano

Last updated

Michael Steven Anthony Graziano (born May 22, 1967 [1] ) is an American scientist and novelist who is currently a professor of Psychology and Neuroscience at Princeton University. [2] His scientific research focuses on the brain basis of awareness. He has proposed the "attention schema" theory, an explanation of how, and for what adaptive advantage, brains attribute the property of awareness to themselves. [3] [4] His previous work focused on how the cerebral cortex monitors the space around the body [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] and controls movement within that space. [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] Notably he has suggested that the classical map of the body in motor cortex, the homunculus, is not correct and is better described as a map of complex actions that make up the behavioral repertoire. [20] His publications on this topic have had a widespread impact among neuroscientists but have also generated controversy. [21] [22] [23] His novels [24] [25] rely partly on his background in psychology and are known for surrealism or magic realism. [26] [27] [28] Graziano also composes music including symphonies [29] and string quartets. [30]

Contents

Biography

Graziano was born in Bridgeport Connecticut in 1967 and spent his childhood in Buffalo, New York. He received his Bachelor of Arts degree from Princeton University in 1989 in Psychology. He attended graduate school in neuroscience at MIT from 1989 to 1991 and then returned to Princeton University to complete his doctoral degree in 1996, in Neuroscience and Psychology. He remained at Princeton University as a postdoctoral researcher and then as a professor of neuroscience and psychology.

Contributions in neuroscience

Graziano has made contributions in three areas of neuroscience: how neurons in the primate brain encode peripersonal space, how the motor cortex controls complex movement, and the possible neuronal basis of consciousness. These contributions are detailed in the following sections.

Peripersonal space

In the 1990s, Graziano with Charles Gross described the properties of a set of multisensory neurons in the monkey brain. Building on the work of Hyvarinen and colleagues [31] [32] and Rizzolatti and colleagues [33] [34] Graziano and Gross described a network of brain areas that appeared to encode the space immediately surrounding the body. [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]

Multimodal neurons in the monkey brain that encode the space near the body. Each neuron responds to touching a specific part of the body called the neuron's tactile receptive field. The same neuron responds to visual stimuli in the space near the tactile receptive field. Two examples are depicted. From Graziano MSA and Gross CG (1998) Spatial maps for the control of movement. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 8: 195 -201. Coding space near body.jpg
Multimodal neurons in the monkey brain that encode the space near the body. Each neuron responds to touching a specific part of the body called the neuron's tactile receptive field. The same neuron responds to visual stimuli in the space near the tactile receptive field. Two examples are depicted. From Graziano MSA and Gross CG (1998) Spatial maps for the control of movement. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 8: 195 -201.

Each multisensory neuron responded to a touch within a specific "tactile receptive field" on the body surface. Each neuron also responded to a visual stimulus near or approaching the tactile receptive field. The "visual receptive field" was therefore a region of nearby space affixed to the relevant body part. Some neurons responded to sound sources near the tactile receptive field. [7] Some neurons also responded mnemonically, becoming active when a part of the body moved through space and approached the remembered location of an object in the dark. [8] The activity of these multisensory neurons therefore signaled the presence of an object near or touching a part of the body, regardless of whether the object was felt, seen, heard, or remembered.

Electrical stimulation of these multisensory neurons almost always evoked a complex, coordinated movement that resembled a flinching, blocking, or protecting action. [16] [17] [18] [19] Chemical inhibition of these neurons produced a "nerves of steel" state in which defensive reactions were inhibited. [16] Chemical enhancement of these neurons produced a "super flincher" state in which any mild stimulus, such as an object gently moved toward the face, evoked a full-blown flinching reaction. [16]

In Graziano's interpretation, [35] these multisensory neurons form a specialized brain-wide network that encodes the space near the body, computes a margin of safety, and helps to coordinate movements in relation to nearby objects with an emphasis on withdrawal or blocking movements. A subtle level of activation might bias ongoing behavior to avoid collision, whereas a strong level of activation evidently causes an overt defensive action.

The neurons that encode peripersonal space may also provide a neuronal basis for the psychological phenomenon of personal space. [35] Personal space, described by Hall, [36] is the flexible bubble of space around each person that is protected from intrusion by other people.

The peripersonal neurons may also play a central role in the body schema [37] an internally computed model of the body first proposed to exist by Head and Holmes in 1911. [38]

An action map in the motor cortex

In the 2000s Graziano's lab obtained evidence suggesting that the motor cortex might not contain a simple map of the body's muscles as in classical descriptions such as Penfield's description of a motor homunculus. [39] Instead, the motor cortex may contain a mapping of coordinated, behaviorally useful actions that make up a typical movement repertoire.

In their initial experiments, Graziano and colleagues used electrical microstimulation on the motor cortex of monkeys. [15] [19] Most previous protocols in the motor cortex used very brief stimulation, such as for a hundredth of a second. Graziano applied the stimulation for half a second each time, on a behaviorally relevant time scale, in order to match the typical duration of a monkey's reaching and grasping. The longer stimulation train in Graziano's experiments evoked complex movements that included many joints and that resembled movements from the animal's behavioral repertoire.

For example, stimulation of one site always caused the hand to close in a grip, the arm to bring the hand to the mouth, and the mouth to open. Stimulation of another site always caused the grip to open, the palm to face away from the body, and the arm to extend, as if the monkey were reaching to grasp an object. Other sites evoked other complex movements. The behavioral repertoire of the animal seemed to be rendered onto the cortical sheet.

This initial work became controversial because of the method of stimulation on a behavioral time scale. The method was not commonly used in the study of motor cortex [40] although it had been used in the study of other brain regions. [20] That controversy may have partially distracted from the other methods used to study the action map. [20] For example, computational models [12] show that when the complex movement repertoire of a monkey is arranged in a flattened map, with similar movements represented near each other, the map closely resembles the known arrangement of the monkey motor cortex.

In Graziano's proposal, many of the complexities of the motor cortex, such as its overlapping maps of the body and its multiple areas with somewhat different mixtures of properties, may be a result of representing the many parts of the movement repertoire each with its own specialized computational requirements. Graziano [20] suggests that the action-map view does not contradict the more traditional view of motor cortex as a set of fields with differing functions. Instead, the action map may help to explain why motor cortex is divided into functionally distinct fields and why the fields are arranged spatially as they are.

Other researchers have since found a similar, ethological organization to motor cortical regions in monkeys, prosimians, cats, and rats. [21] [22] [41] [42] [43] Notwithstanding, direct tests of the idea that the motor cortex contains a movement repertoire have not corroborated this hypothesis. [23] Varying the initial position of the forelimb does not change the muscle synergies evoked by microstimulation of a motor cortical point. Consequently, the evoked movements reach nearly the same final end point and posture, with variability. [23] However, the movement trajectories are quite different depending on the initial limb posture and the starting position of the paw. The evoked movement trajectory is most natural when the forelimb lays pendant ~ perpendicular to the ground (i.e., in equilibrium with the gravitational force). From other starting positions, the movements do not appear natural. The paths of the paw are curved with changes and reversals of direction and the passive influence of the gravitational force on the movements is obvious. These observations demonstrate that while the output of the cortical point evokes a seemingly coordinated limb movement from a rest position, it does not specify a particular movement direction or a controlled trajectory from other initial positions. Thus, in natural conditions a controlled movement must depend on the coordinated activation of a multitude of cortical points, terminating at a final locus of motor cortical activity, which holds the limb at a spatial location. [23]

Basis of consciousness in the brain

Since 2010 Graziano's lab has studied the brain basis of consciousness. Graziano [44] [45] proposed that specialized machinery in the brain computes the feature of awareness and attributes it to other people in a social context. The same machinery, in that hypothesis, also attributes the feature of awareness to oneself. Damage to that machinery disrupts one's own awareness.

The attention schema theory (AST) seeks to explain how an information-processing machine could act the way people do, insisting it has consciousness, describing consciousness in the ways that we do, and claiming that it has an inner magic that transcends mere information-processing, even though it does not. AST is currently being incorporated into artificial intelligence systems through the work of the international Astound project.

The proposed AST was partly motivated by two sets of previous findings.

First, certain regions of the cortex are recruited during social perception as people construct models of other people's minds. [46] [47] [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] [53] These regions include, among other areas, the superior temporal sulcus (STS) and the temporoparietal junction (TPJ) bilaterally but with a strong emphasis on the right hemisphere.

Second, when these same regions of cortex are damaged, people suffer from a catastrophic disruption of their own awareness of events and objects around them. The clinical syndrome of hemispatial neglect, or loss of awareness of one side of space, is particularly profound after damage to the TPJ or STS in the right hemisphere. [54] [55]

The conjunction of these two previous findings led to the suggestion that awareness may be a computed feature constructed by an expert system in the brain, that at least partly overlaps the TPJ and STS. In that proposal, the feature of awareness can be attributed to other people in the context of social perception. It can also be attributed to oneself, in effect creating one's own awareness.

Why construct the feature of awareness and attribute it to other people? In order to understand and predict the behavior of other people, it is useful to monitor other people's attentional state. Attention is a data handling method by which some signals in the brain are enhanced at the expense of others. According to the AST, [45] when the brain computes that person X is aware of thing Y, it is in effect modeling the state in which person X is applying an attentional enhancement to signal Y. Awareness is an attention schema. In that theory, the same process can be applied to oneself. One's own awareness is a schematized model of one's own attention.

Books

Graziano writes literary novels under his own name and children's novels under the pseudonym B. B. Wurge. His stated reason for the pseudonym is to ensure that children do not accidentally read the wrong category of book. [56] His novels have been praised for their originality, vividness, and surreal imagination. [26] [27] [28] His book for children, The Last Notebook of Leonardo, won the 2011 Moonbeam Award.

His books include:

Literary Novels:

The Love Song of Monkey (2008)
Cretaceous Dawn (2008)
The Divine Farce (2009)
Death My Own Way (2012)

Children's Novels (written under the name B. B. Wurge):

Billy and the Birdfrogs (2008)
Squiggle (2009)
The Last Notebook of Leonardo (2010)

Books on Neuroscience:

The Intelligent Movement Machine (2008)
God, Soul, Mind, Brain (2010)
Consciousness and the Social Brain (2013)
The Spaces Between Us: A Story of Neuroscience, Evolution, and Human Nature (2018)
Rethinking Consciousness: A Scientific Theory of Subjective Experience (2019)

Books of music:

Three Modern Symphonies (2011)
Symphonies 4, 5, and 6 (2012)
Five String Quartets (2012)

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Parietal lobe</span> Part of the brain responsible for sensory input and some language processing

The parietal lobe is one of the four major lobes of the cerebral cortex in the brain of mammals. The parietal lobe is positioned above the temporal lobe and behind the frontal lobe and central sulcus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Claustrum</span> Structure in the brain

The claustrum is a thin sheet of neurons and supporting glial cells, that connects to the cerebral cortex and subcortical regions including the amygdala, hippocampus and thalamus of the brain. It is located between the insular cortex laterally and the putamen medially, encased by the extreme and external capsules respectively. Blood to the claustrum is supplied by the middle cerebral artery. It is considered to be the most densely connected structure in the brain, and thus hypothesized to allow for the integration of various cortical inputs such as vision, sound and touch, into one experience. Other hypotheses suggest that the claustrum plays a role in salience processing, to direct attention towards the most behaviorally relevant stimuli amongst the background noise. The claustrum is difficult to study given the limited number of individuals with claustral lesions and the poor resolution of neuroimaging.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Superior colliculus</span> Structure in the midbrain

In neuroanatomy, the superior colliculus is a structure lying on the roof of the mammalian midbrain. In non-mammalian vertebrates, the homologous structure is known as the optic tectum or optic lobe. The adjective form tectal is commonly used for both structures.

A mirror neuron is a neuron that fires both when an animal acts and when the animal observes the same action performed by another. Thus, the neuron "mirrors" the behavior of the other, as though the observer were itself acting. Mirror neurons are not always physiologically distinct from other types of neurons in the brain; their main differentiating factor is their response patterns. By this definition, such neurons have been directly observed in humans and primate species, and in birds.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Motor cortex</span> Region of the cerebral cortex

The motor cortex is the region of the cerebral cortex involved in the planning, control, and execution of voluntary movements. The motor cortex is an area of the frontal lobe located in the posterior precentral gyrus immediately anterior to the central sulcus.

A gamma wave or gamma rhythm is a pattern of neural oscillation in humans with a frequency between 25 and 140 Hz, the 40 Hz point being of particular interest. Gamma rhythms are correlated with large-scale brain network activity and cognitive phenomena such as working memory, attention, and perceptual grouping, and can be increased in amplitude via meditation or neurostimulation. Altered gamma activity has been observed in many mood and cognitive disorders such as Alzheimer's disease, epilepsy, and schizophrenia.

A neuronal ensemble is a population of nervous system cells involved in a particular neural computation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Premotor cortex</span> Part of the human brain

The premotor cortex is an area of the motor cortex lying within the frontal lobe of the brain just anterior to the primary motor cortex. It occupies part of Brodmann's area 6. It has been studied mainly in primates, including monkeys and humans. The functions of the premotor cortex are diverse and not fully understood. It projects directly to the spinal cord and therefore may play a role in the direct control of behavior, with a relative emphasis on the trunk muscles of the body. It may also play a role in planning movement, in the spatial guidance of movement, in the sensory guidance of movement, in understanding the actions of others, and in using abstract rules to perform specific tasks. Different subregions of the premotor cortex have different properties and presumably emphasize different functions. Nerve signals generated in the premotor cortex cause much more complex patterns of movement than the discrete patterns generated in the primary motor cortex.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supplementary motor area</span> Midline region in front of the motor cortex of the brain

The supplementary motor area (SMA) is a part of the motor cortex of primates that contributes to the control of movement. It is located on the midline surface of the hemisphere just in front of the primary motor cortex leg representation. In monkeys the SMA contains a rough map of the body. In humans the body map is not apparent. Neurons in the SMA project directly to the spinal cord and may play a role in the direct control of movement. Possible functions attributed to the SMA include the postural stabilization of the body, the coordination of both sides of the body such as during bimanual action, the control of movements that are internally generated rather than triggered by sensory events, and the control of sequences of movements. All of these proposed functions remain hypotheses. The precise role or roles of the SMA is not yet known.

Premovement neuronal activity in neurophysiological literature refers to neuronal modulations that alter the rate at which neurons fire before a subject produces movement. Through experimentation with multiple animals, predominantly monkeys, it has been shown that several regions of the brain are particularly active and involved in initiation and preparation of movement. Two specific membrane potentials, the bereitschaftspotential, or the BP, and contingent negative variation, or the CNV, play a pivotal role in premovement neuronal activity. Both have been shown to be directly involved in planning and initiating movement. Multiple factors are involved with premovement neuronal activity including motor preparation, inhibition of motor response, programming of the target of movement, closed-looped and open-looped tasks, instructed delay periods, short-lead and long-lead changes, and mirror motor neurons.

In cognitive neuroscience, visual modularity is an organizational concept concerning how vision works. The way in which the primate visual system operates is currently under intense scientific scrutiny. One dominant thesis is that different properties of the visual world require different computational solutions which are implemented in anatomically/functionally distinct regions that operate independently – that is, in a modular fashion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Posterior parietal cortex</span> Part of the human brain

The posterior parietal cortex plays an important role in planned movements, spatial reasoning, and attention.

Body schema is an organism's internal model of its own body, including the position of its limbs. The neurologist Sir Henry Head originally defined it as a postural model of the body that actively organizes and modifies 'the impressions produced by incoming sensory impulses in such a way that the final sensation of body position, or of locality, rises into consciousness charged with a relation to something that has happened before'. As a postural model that keeps track of limb position, it plays an important role in control of action.

Microstimulation is a technique that stimulates a small population of neurons by passing a small electrical current through a nearby microelectrode.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Neural correlates of consciousness</span> Neuronal events sufficient for a specific conscious percept

The neural correlates of consciousness (NCC) are the minimal set of neuronal events and mechanisms sufficient for the occurrence of the mental states to which they are related. Neuroscientists use empirical approaches to discover neural correlates of subjective phenomena; that is, neural changes which necessarily and regularly correlate with a specific experience. The set should be minimal because, under the materialist assumption that the brain is sufficient to give rise to any given conscious experience, the question is which of its components are necessary to produce it.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Electrical brain stimulation</span> Form of electrotherapy

Electrical brain stimulation (EBS), also referred to as focal brain stimulation (FBS), is a form of electrotherapy used as a technique in research and clinical neurobiology to stimulate a neuron or neural network in the brain through the direct or indirect excitation of its cell membrane by using an electric current. EBS is used for research or for therapeutic purposes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vittorio Gallese</span> Italian physiologist (born 1959)

Vittorio Gallese is professor of Psychobiology at the University of Parma, Italy, and was professor in Experimental Aesthetics at the University of London, UK (2016–2018). He is an expert in neurophysiology, cognitive neuroscience, social neuroscience, and philosophy of mind. Gallese is one of the discoverers of mirror neurons. His research attempts to elucidate the functional organization of brain mechanisms underlying social cognition, including action understanding, empathy, language, mindreading and aesthetic experience.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Primary motor cortex</span> Brain region

The primary motor cortex is a brain region that in humans is located in the dorsal portion of the frontal lobe. It is the primary region of the motor system and works in association with other motor areas including premotor cortex, the supplementary motor area, posterior parietal cortex, and several subcortical brain regions, to plan and execute voluntary movements. Primary motor cortex is defined anatomically as the region of cortex that contains large neurons known as Betz cells, which, along with other cortical neurons, send long axons down the spinal cord to synapse onto the interneuron circuitry of the spinal cord and also directly onto the alpha motor neurons in the spinal cord which connect to the muscles.

Social cognitive neuroscience is the scientific study of the biological processes underpinning social cognition. Specifically, it uses the tools of neuroscience to study "the mental mechanisms that create, frame, regulate, and respond to our experience of the social world". Social cognitive neuroscience uses the epistemological foundations of cognitive neuroscience, and is closely related to social neuroscience. Social cognitive neuroscience employs human neuroimaging, typically using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Human brain stimulation techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct-current stimulation are also used. In nonhuman animals, direct electrophysiological recordings and electrical stimulation of single cells and neuronal populations are utilized for investigating lower-level social cognitive processes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eberhard Fetz</span> American neuroscientist, academic and researcher

Eberhard Erich Fetz is an American neuroscientist, academic and researcher. He is a Professor of Physiology and Biophysics and DXARTS at the University of Washington.

References

  1. ↑ As stated in the catalog of the National Library of Israel.
  2. ↑ Princeton University, Department of Psychology, Faculty Information Archived 2010-04-29 at the Wayback Machine
  3. ↑ Graziano, Michael S. A. (2013). Consciousness and the Social Brain. Oxford University Press. ISBN   978-0-19-992864-4.
  4. ↑ Graziano, MSA; Kastner, S (2011). "Human consciousness and its relationship to social neuroscience: A novel hypothesis". Cognitive Neuroscience. 2 (2): 98–113. doi:10.1080/17588928.2011.565121. PMC   3223025 . PMID   22121395.
  5. ↑ Aflalo, TN; Graziano, MSA (2008). "Four dimensional spatial reasoning in humans". Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 34 (5): 1066–1077. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.505.5736 . doi:10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1066. PMID   18823195.
  6. ↑ Graziano, MSA; Cooke, DF; Taylor, CSR (2000). "Coding the location of the arm by sight". Science. 290 (5497): 1782–1786. Bibcode:2000Sci...290.1782G. doi:10.1126/science.290.5497.1782. PMID   11099420. S2CID   13104435.
  7. 1 2 3 Graziano, MSA; Reiss, LAJ; Gross, CG (1999). "A neuronal representation of the location of nearby sounds". Nature. 397 (6718): 428–430. Bibcode:1999Natur.397..428G. doi:10.1038/17115. PMID   9989407. S2CID   4415358.
  8. 1 2 3 Graziano, MSA; Hu, XT; Gross, CG (1997). "Coding the locations of objects in the dark". Science. 277 (5323): 239–241. doi:10.1126/science.277.5323.239. PMID   9211852. S2CID   13648729.
  9. 1 2 Graziano, MSA; Hu, XT; Gross, CG (1997). "Visuo-spatial properties of ventral premotor cortex". Journal of Neurophysiology. 77 (5): 2268–2292. doi:10.1152/jn.1997.77.5.2268. PMID   9163357. S2CID   1730131.
  10. 1 2 Graziano, MSA; Yap, GS; Gross, CG (1994). "Coding of visual space by pre-motor neurons". Science. 266 (5187): 1054–1057. Bibcode:1994Sci...266.1054G. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.211.7236 . doi:10.1126/science.7973661. PMID   7973661.
  11. 1 2 Graziano, MSA; Gross, CG (1993). "A bimodal map of space: somatosensory receptive fields in the macaque putamen with corresponding visual receptive fields". Experimental Brain Research. 97 (1): 96–109. doi:10.1007/BF00228820. PMID   8131835. S2CID   9387557.
  12. 1 2 Graziano, MSA; Aflalo, TN (2007). "Mapping behavioral repertoire onto the cortex". Neuron. 56 (2): 239–251. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.09.013 . PMID   17964243.
  13. ↑ Aflalo, TN; Graziano, MSA (2007). "Relationship between unconstrained arm movement and single neuron firing in the macaque motor cortex". Journal of Neuroscience. 27 (11): 2760–2780. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3147-06.2007. PMC   6672576 . PMID   17360898.
  14. ↑ Graziano, MSA (2006). "The organization of behavioral repertoire in motor cortex". Annual Review of Neuroscience. 29 (1): 105–134. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.112924. PMID   16776581. S2CID   7510738.
  15. 1 2 Graziano, MSA; Aflalo, TN; Cooke, DF (2005). "Arm movements evoked by electrical stimulation in the motor cortex of monkeys". Journal of Neurophysiology. 94 (6): 4209–4223. doi:10.1152/jn.01303.2004. PMID   16120657. S2CID   9521256.
  16. 1 2 3 4 Cooke, DF; Graziano, MSA (2004). "Super-flinchers and nerves of steel: Defensive movements altered by chemical manipulation of a cortical motor area". Neuron. 43 (4): 585–593. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.07.029 . PMID   15312656.
  17. 1 2 Cooke, DF; Graziano, MSA (2004). "Sensorimotor integration in the precentral gyrus: Polysensory neurons and defensive movements". Journal of Neurophysiology. 91 (4): 1648–1660. doi:10.1152/jn.00955.2003. PMID   14586035. S2CID   13627099.
  18. 1 2 Cooke, DF; Taylor, CSR; Moore, T; Graziano, MSA (2003). "Complex movements evoked by microstimulation of Area VIP". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 100 (10): 6163–6168. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1031751100 . PMC   156343 . PMID   12719522.
  19. 1 2 3 Graziano, MSA; Taylor, CSR; Moore, T (2002). "Complex movements evoked by microstimulation of precentral cortex". Neuron. 34 (5): 841–851. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00698-0 . PMID   12062029.
  20. 1 2 3 4 Graziano, M. S. A. (2008). The Intelligent Movement Machine. Oxford University Press. ISBN   978-0195326703.[ page needed ]
  21. 1 2 Ethier, C; Brizzi, L; Darling, WG; Capaday, C (2006). "Linear summation of cat motor cortex outputs". Journal of Neuroscience. 26 (20): 5574–5581. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5332-05.2006. PMC   6675291 . PMID   16707808.
  22. 1 2 Ramanathan, D; Conner, JM; Tuszynski, MH (2006). "A form of motor cortical plasticity that correlates with recovery of function after brain injury". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 103 (30): 11370–11375. Bibcode:2006PNAS..10311370R. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601065103 . PMC   1544093 . PMID   16837575.
  23. 1 2 3 4 Capaday, Charles (2022-08-11). "Motor cortex outputs evoked by long-duration microstimulation encode synergistic muscle activation patterns not controlled movement trajectories". Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience. 16. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2022.851485 . ISSN   1662-5188. PMC   9434634 . PMID   36062251.
  24. ↑ Graziano, M. S. A. (2008). The Love Song of Monkey. Leapfrog Press. ISBN   9780981514802.
  25. ↑ Graziano, M. S. A. (2009). The Divine Farce. Leapfrog Press. ISBN   978-1935248040.
  26. 1 2 Archived 2012-03-02 at the Wayback Machine Geekscribe.com, book review from Oct. 18, 2009.
  27. 1 2 "book review from Sept. 14, 2009". Publishers Weekly . Archived from the original on October 29, 2013.
  28. 1 2 "book review from Dec. 3, 2009". Barnstable Patriot. 2009-12-03. Archived from the original on 2015-10-16. Retrieved 2010-01-04.
  29. ↑ Graziano, MSA (2011). Three modern symphonies and five character sketches in full score. Teaticket, Massachusetts: Quercus Press. ISBN   978-0982747018.
  30. ↑ "Sensory Motor Lab".
  31. ↑ Hyvarinen, J. (1981). "Regional distribution of functions in parietal association area 7 of the monkey". Brain Research. 206 (2): 287–303. doi:10.1016/0006-8993(81)90533-3. PMID   7214136. S2CID   53178684.
  32. ↑ Hyvarinen, J; Poranen, A (1974). "Function of the parietal associative area 7 as revealed from cellular discharges in alert monkeys". Brain. 97 (4): 673–692. doi: 10.1093/brain/97.1.673 . PMID   4434188.
  33. ↑ Rizzolatti, G; Scandolara, C; Matelli, M; Gentilucci, M. (1981). "Afferent properties of periarcuate neurons in macaque monkeys. II. Visual responses". Behavioural Brain Research. 2 (2): 147–163. doi:10.1016/0166-4328(81)90053-X. PMID   7248055. S2CID   4028658.
  34. ↑ Fogassi, L; Gallese, V.; di Pellegrino, G; Fadiga, L; Gentilucci, M; Luppino, M; Pedotti, A; Rizzolatti, G (1992). "Space coding by premotor cortex". Experimental Brain Research. 89 (3): 686–690. doi:10.1007/bf00229894. PMID   1644132. S2CID   38313581.
  35. 1 2 Graziano, MSA; Cooke, DF (2006). "Parieto-frontal interactions, personal space, and defensive behavior". Neuropsychologia. 44 (6): 845–859. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.09.009. PMID   16277998. S2CID   11368801.
  36. ↑ Hall, ET (1966). The Hidden Dimension. Garden City, New York: Anchor Books. ISBN   978-0385084765.[ page needed ]
  37. ↑ Graziano, MSA; Botvinick, MM (2002). "How the brain represents the body: insights from neurophysiology and psychology".{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help) In: Prinz, W; Hommel, B, eds. (2002). Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action. Attention and Performance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. pp. 136–157. ISBN   978-0198510697.
  38. ↑ Head, H; Holmes, G (1911). "Sensory disturbances from cerebral lesions". Brain. 34 (2–3): 102–254. doi:10.1093/brain/34.2-3.102.
  39. ↑ Penfield, W; Boldrey, E (1937). "Somatic motor and sensory representation in the cerebral cortex of man as studied by electrical stimulation". Brain. 60 (4): 389–443. doi:10.1093/brain/60.4.389.
  40. ↑ Strick, PL (2002). "Stimulating Research on Motor Cortex". Nature Neuroscience. 5 (8): 714–715. doi:10.1038/nn0802-714. PMID   12149622. S2CID   6146202.
  41. ↑ Stepniewska, I; Fang, PC; Kaas, JH (2005). "Microstimulation reveals specialized subregions for different complex movements in posterior parietal cortex of prosimian galagos". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 102 (13): 4878–4883. Bibcode:2005PNAS..102.4878S. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501048102 . PMC   555725 . PMID   15772167.
  42. ↑ Gharbawie, OA; Stepniewska, I; Qi, H; Kaas, JH (2011). "Multiple parietal-frontal pathways mediate grasping in macaque monkeys". Journal of Neuroscience. 31 (32): 11660–11677. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1777-11.2011. PMC   3166522 . PMID   21832196.
  43. ↑ Haiss, F; Schwartz, C (2005). "Spatial segregation of different modes of movement control in the whisker representation of rat primary motor cortex". Journal of Neuroscience. 25 (6): 1579–1587. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3760-04.2005. PMC   6726007 . PMID   15703412.
  44. ↑ Graziano, MSA (2010). God, Soul, Mind, Brain: A Neuroscientist's Reflections on the Spirit World. Teaticket MA: Leapfrog Press. ISBN   9781935248118.[ page needed ]
  45. 1 2 Graziano, MSA; Kastner, S (2011). "Human consciousness and its relationship to social neuroscience: A novel hypothesis". Cog Neurosci. 2 (2): 98–113. doi:10.1080/17588928.2011.565121. PMC   3223025 . PMID   22121395.
  46. ↑ Brunet, E; Sarfati, Y; Hardy-Baylé, MC; Decety, J (2000). "A PET investigation of the attribution of intentions with a nonverbal task". NeuroImage. 11 (2): 157–166. doi:10.1006/nimg.1999.0525. PMID   10679187. S2CID   11846982.
  47. ↑ Ciaramidaro, A; Adenzato, M; Enrici, I; Erk, S; Pia, L; Bara, BG; Walter, H (2007). "The intentional network: how the brain reads varieties of intentions". Neuropsychologia. 45 (13): 3105–3113. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.05.011. PMID   17669444. S2CID   16379004.
  48. ↑ Fletcher, PC; Happé, F; Frith, U; Baker, SC; Dolan, RJ; Frackowiak, RS; Frith, CD (1995). "Other minds in the brain: a functional imaging study of "theory of mind" in story comprehension". Cognition. 57 (2): 109–128. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(95)00692-R. hdl: 21.11116/0000-0001-A1FA-F . PMID   8556839. S2CID   16321133.
  49. ↑ Gallagher, HL; Happé, F; Brunswick, N; Fletcher, PC; Frith, U; Frith, CD (2000). "Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: an fMRI study of 'theory of mind' in verbal and nonverbal tasks". Neuropsychologia. 38 (1): 11–21. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00053-6. PMID   10617288. S2CID   8933444.
  50. ↑ Goel, V; Grafman, J; Sadato, N; Hallett, M (1995). "Modeling other minds". NeuroReport. 6 (13): 1741–1746. doi:10.1097/00001756-199509000-00009. PMID   8541472. S2CID   8560791.
  51. ↑ Saxe, R; Kanwisher, N (2003). "People thinking about thinking people: fMRI investigations of theory of mind". NeuroImage. 19 (4): 1835–1842. doi:10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00230-1. PMID   12948738. S2CID   206118958.
  52. ↑ Saxe, R; Wexler, A (2005). "Making sense of another mind: the role of the right temporo-parietal junction". Neuropsychologia. 43 (10): 1391–1399. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.02.013. PMID   15936784. S2CID   2714027.
  53. ↑ Vogeley, K; Bussfeld, P; Newen, A; Herrmann, S; Happé, F; Falkai, P; Maier, W; Shah, NJ; et al. (2001). "Mind reading: neural mechanisms of theory of mind and self-perspective". NeuroImage. 14 (1 Pt 1): 170–81. doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0789. PMID   11525326. S2CID   7053366.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  54. ↑ Karnath, HO; Ferber, S; Himmelbach, M (2001). "Spatial awareness is a function of the temporal not the posterior parietal lobe". Nature. 411 (6840): 950–953. Bibcode:2001Natur.411..950K. doi:10.1038/35082075. PMID   11418859. S2CID   4312553.
  55. ↑ Vallar, G; Perani, D (1986). "The anatomy of unilateral neglect after right-hemisphere stroke lesions. A clinical/CT-scan correlation study in man". Neuropsychologia. 24 (5): 609–622. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(86)90001-1. PMID   3785649. S2CID   40805768.
  56. ↑ "Book Review". Princeton Packet. November 25, 2008.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.