Microturbine

Last updated

A microturbine (MT) is a small gas turbine with similar cycles and components to a heavy gas turbine. The MT power-to-weight ratio is better than a heavy gas turbine because the reduction of turbine diameters causes an increase in shaft rotational speed. Heavy gas turbine generators are too large and too expensive for distributed power applications, so MTs are developed for small-scale power like electrical power generation alone or as combined cooling, heating, and power (CCHP) systems. [1] The MT are 25 to 500  kW (34 to 671  hp ) gas turbines evolved from piston engine turbochargers, aircraft auxiliary power units (APU) or small jet engines, the size of a refrigerator. [2] Early turbines of 30–70 kW (40–94 hp) grew to 200–250 kW (270–340 hp). [3]

Contents

Design

Cutaway of a recuperated microturbine GasTurbine.svg
Cutaway of a recuperated microturbine

They comprise a compressor, combustor, impeller/turbine and electric generator on a single shaft or two. They can have a recuperator capturing waste heat to improve the compressor efficiency, an intercooler and reheat. They rotate at over 40,000 RPM and a common single shaft microturbine rotate usually at 90,000 to 120,000 RPM. [2] They often have a single stage radial compressor and a single stage radial turbine. Recuperators are difficult to design and manufacture because they operate under high pressure and temperature differentials.

Advances in electronics allows unattended operation and electronic power switching technology eliminates the need for the generator to be synchronised with the power grid, allowing it to be integrated with the turbine shaft and to double as the starter motor. Gas turbines accept most commercial fuels, such as petrol, natural gas, propane, diesel fuel, and kerosene as well as renewable fuels such as E85, biodiesel and biogas. Starting on kerosene or diesel can require a more volatile product such as propane gas. Microturbines can use micro-combustion.

Full-size gas turbines often use ball bearings. The 1,000 °C (1,270 K; 1,830 °F) temperatures and high speeds of microturbines make oil lubrication and ball bearings impractical; they require air bearings or possibly magnetic bearings. [4] They may be designed with foil bearings and air-cooling operating without lubricating oil, coolants or other hazardous materials. [5]

To maximize part-load efficiency, multiple turbines can be started or stopped as needed in an integrated system. [3] Reciprocating engines can react quickly to power requirement changes while microturbines lose more efficiency at low power levels. They can have a higher power-to-weight ratio than piston engines, low emissions and few, or just one, moving part. Reciprocating engines can be more efficient, be cheaper overall and typically use simple journal bearings lubricated by motor oil.

Microturbines can be used for cogeneration and distributed generation as turbo alternators or turbogenerators, or to power hybrid electric vehicles. The majority of the waste heat is contained in the relatively high temperature exhaust making it simpler to capture, while reciprocating engines waste heat is split between its exhaust and cooling system. [6] Exhaust heat can be used for water heating, space heating, drying processes or absorption chillers, which create cold for air conditioning from heat energy instead of electric energy.

Efficiency

Microturbines have around 15% efficiencies without a recuperator, 20 to 30% with one and they can reach 85% combined thermal-electrical efficiency in cogeneration. [2] The recuperated Niigata Power Systems 300 kW (400 hp) RGT3R thermal efficiency reaches 32.5% while the 360 kW (480 hp) non recuperated RGT3C is at 16.3%. [7] Capstone Turbine claims a 33% LHV Electrical Efficiency for its 200 kW (270 hp) C200S. [8]

In 1988, the NEDO started the Ceramic Gas Turbine project within the Japanese New Sunshine Project: in 1999 the recuperated twin-shaft 311.6 kW (417.9 hp) Kawasaki Heavy Industries CGT302 achieved a 42.1% efficiency and a 1,350 °C (1,620 K; 2,460 °F) turbine inlet temperature. [9] [10] In October 2010, Capstone was awarded by the US Department of Energy the design of a two-stage intercooled microturbine derived from its current 200 kW (270 hp) and 65 kW (87 hp) engines for a 370 kW (500 hp) turbine targeting a 42% electrical efficiency. [11] Researchers from the Lappeenranta University of Technology designed a 500 kW (670 hp) intercooled and recuperated two-shaft microturbine aiming for a 45% efficiency. [12]

Market

Forecast international predicts a 51.4% market share for Capstone Turbine by unit production from 2008 to 2032, followed by Bladon Jets with 19.4%, MTT with 13.6%, FlexEnergy with 10.9% and Ansaldo Energia with 4.5%. [13]

Ultra micro

MIT started its millimeter size turbine engine project in the middle of the 1990s when Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Alan H. Epstein considered the possibility of creating a personal turbine which will be able to meet all the demands of a modern person's electrical needs, just as a large turbine can meet the electricity demands of a small city. Problems have occurred with heat dissipation and high-speed bearings in these new microturbines. Moreover, their expected efficiency is a very low 5-6%. According to Professor Epstein, current commercial Li-ion rechargeable batteries deliver about 120–150 Wh/kg (200–240 kJ/lb). MIT's millimeter size turbine will deliver 500–700 Wh/kg (820–1,140 kJ/lb) in the near term, rising to 1,200–1,500 Wh/kg (2,000–2,400 kJ/lb) in the longer term. [14]

A similar microturbine built by the Belgian Katholieke Universiteit Leuven has a rotor diameter of 20 mm and is expected to produce about 1,000 W (1.3 hp). [4]

Aircraft

Safran-backed French startup Turbotech is developing a 73 kW (98 shp) turboprop with a recuperator to improve efficiency from 10 to 30%, for a brake specific fuel consumption similar to a piston engine, but 30 kg (66 lb) lighter at 55 kg (121 lb) and without cooling drag. Direct operating costs, Turbotech says, should be reduced by 30% due to more diverse fuels and lower maintenance with a doubled time between overhaul at 4,000 h. Targeted for high-end ultralight two-seaters and unmanned aircraft, it will be slightly more expensive than a competing Rotax 912 but should be as competitive over its life cycle. For a VTOL two-seater, a 55 kW (74 hp) turbogenerator would weigh 85 kg (187 lb) with fuel for 2.5 h of endurance instead of 1 ton of batteries. A demonstrator ran in 2016-17 and ground-testing began in the second half of 2018 before flight testing in the second half of 2019 and first delivery in the first half of 2020.[ needs update ] The final assembly line was created in Toussus-le-Noble Airport near Paris, for a 1,000-engine annual output by 2025. [15] A 30% efficiency is equivalent to a 281 g/kWh fuel consumption with a 42.7 MJ/kg fuel. The 64 kg (141 lb) TP-R90 turboprop or TG-R90 turbogenerator can output 90 kW (120 hp) and burns 18–25 L (4.8–6.6 US gal) of jet fuel per hour in cruise. [16]

Czech PBS Velká Bíteš offers its 180 kW (240 hp) TP100 turboprop weighing 61.6 kg (136 lb) for ultralights and UAVs, consuming 515 g/kWh (5.05 oz/MJ). [17] This is equivalent to 16.4% of efficiency with a 42.7 MJ/kg fuel.

Miami-based UAV Turbines developed its 40 hp (30 kW) Monarch RP (previously UTP50R) recuperated turboprop for around 1,320 lb (600 kg)-gross weight aircraft, to be tested on a TigerShark UAV. [18] On 10 December 2019, the company unveiled its Monarch Hybrid Range Extender, a 33 shp (25 kW) hybrid-electric demonstrator based on its Monarch 5 turbine unveiled in September, weighting 27 kg (60 lb) for the engine and 54 kg (119 lb) for the whole system. [19]

Hybrid vehicles

When used in extended range electric vehicles the static efficiency drawback is less important, since the gas turbine can be run at or near maximum power, driving an alternator to produce electricity either for the wheel motors, or for the batteries, as appropriate to speed and battery state. The batteries act as a "buffer" (energy storage) in delivering the required amount of power to the wheel motors, rendering throttle response of the gas turbine irrelevant.

There is, moreover, no need for a significant or variable-speed gearbox; turning an alternator at comparatively high speeds allows for a smaller and lighter alternator than would otherwise be the case. The superior power-to-weight ratio of the gas turbine and its fixed speed gearbox, allows for a much lighter prime mover than for the Toyota Prius (a 1.8 litre petrol engine) or the Chevrolet Volt (a 1.4 litre petrol engine). This in turn allows a heavier weight of batteries to be carried, which allows for a longer electric-only range. Alternatively, the vehicle can use heavier, cheaper lead acid batteries or safer lithium iron phosphate battery.

In extended-range electric vehicles, like those planned[ when? ] by Land-Rover/Range-Rover in conjunction with Bladon, or by Jaguar also in partnership with Bladon, the very poor throttling response (their high moment of rotational inertia) does not matter,[ citation needed ] because the gas turbine, which may be spinning at 100,000 rpm, is not directly, mechanically connected to the wheels. It was this poor throttling response that so bedeviled the 1950 Rover gas turbine-powered prototype motor car, which did not have the advantage of an intermediate electric drive train to provide sudden power spikes when demanded by the driver. [ further explanation needed ]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gas turbine</span> Type of internal and continuous combustion engine

A gas turbine or gas turbine engine, by its old name internal combustion turbine, is a type of continuous flow internal combustion engine. The main parts common to all gas turbine engines form the power-producing part and are, in the direction of flow:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aircraft engine</span> Engine designed for use in powered aircraft

An aircraft engine, often referred to as an aero engine, is the power component of an aircraft propulsion system. Aircraft using power components are referred to as powered flight. Most aircraft engines are either piston engines or gas turbines, although a few have been rocket powered and in recent years many small UAVs have used electric motors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Napier Nomad</span> British diesel aircraft engine

The Napier Nomad is a British diesel aircraft engine designed and built by Napier & Son in 1949. They combined a piston engine with a turbine to recover energy from the exhaust and thereby improve fuel economy. Two versions were tested, the complex Nomad I which used two propellers, each driven by the mechanically independent stages, and the Nomad II, using the turbo-compound principle, coupled the two parts to drive a single propeller. The Nomad II had the lowest specific fuel consumption figures seen up to that time. Despite this the Nomad project was cancelled in 1955 having spent £5.1 million on development, as most interest had passed to turboprop designs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bristol Theseus</span> 1940s British turboprop aircraft engine

The Theseus was the Bristol Aeroplane Company's first attempt at a gas-turbine engine design. A turboprop delivering just over 2,000 hp (1,500 kW) was chosen rather than compete with companies that were already developing turbojets. A heat exchanger to transfer waste heat from the exhaust to the compressor exit was necessary to meet a requirement for a fuel consumption comparable to a piston engine. However, the heat exchanger was abandoned after tests showed that it had a high pressure loss and only produced a fuel saving of 8%. Furthermore overall performance was reduced

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rolls-Royce Clyde</span> 1940s British turboprop aircraft engine

The Rolls-Royce RB.39 Clyde was Rolls-Royce's first purpose-designed turboprop engine and the first turboprop engine to pass its civil and military type-tests.

Capstone Green Energy, formerly Capstone Turbine Corporation, was incorporated in 1988 as a California based gas turbine manufacturer that specializes in microturbine power along with heating and cooling cogeneration systems. Key to the Capstone design is its use of air bearings, which provides maintenance and fluid-free operation for the lifetime of the turbine and reduces the system to a single moving part. This also eliminates the need for any cooling or other secondary systems. The Capstone microturbine is a versatile and dispatchable technology that is fuel flexible and scalable enough to fit a variety of applications.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Allison T56</span> American-built military turboprop (1954–)

The Allison T56 is an American single-shaft, modular design military turboprop with a 14-stage axial flow compressor driven by a four-stage turbine. It was originally developed by the Allison Engine Company for the Lockheed C-130 Hercules transport entering production in 1954. It has been a Rolls-Royce product since 1995 when Allison was acquired by Rolls-Royce. The commercial version is designated 501-D. Over 18,000 engines have been produced since 1954, logging over 200 million flying hours.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rolls-Royce Tyne</span> 1950s British turboprop aircraft engine

The Rolls-Royce RB.109 Tyne is a twin-shaft turboprop engine developed in the mid to late 1950s by Rolls-Royce Limited to a requirement for the Vickers Vanguard airliner. It was first test flown during 1956 in the nose of a modified Avro Lincoln. Following company naming convention for gas turbine engines this turboprop design was named after the River Tyne.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Electric aircraft</span> Aircraft powered directly by electricity, with no other engine needed

An electric aircraft is an aircraft powered by electricity. Electric aircraft are seen as a way to reduce the environmental effects of aviation, providing zero emissions and quieter flights. Electricity may be supplied by a variety of methods, the most common being batteries. Most have electric motors driving propellers or turbines.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Allison Model 250</span> Turboshaft aircraft engine

The Allison Model 250, now known as the Rolls-Royce M250, is a highly successful turboshaft engine family, originally developed by the Allison Engine Company in the early 1960s. The Model 250 has been produced by Rolls-Royce since it acquired Allison in 1995.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">General Electric GE38</span> Gas turbine

The General Electric GE38 is a gas turbine developed by GE Aviation for turboprop and turboshaft applications. It powers the Sikorsky CH-53K King Stallion as the T408.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Avco-Lycoming AGT1500</span> Turbine engine

The Avco-Lycoming AGT1500 is a gas turbine engine. It is the main powerplant of the M1 Abrams series of tanks. The engine was originally designed and produced by the Lycoming Turbine Engine Division in the Stratford Army Engine Plant. In 1995, production was moved to the Anniston Army Depot in Anniston, Alabama, after the Stratford Army Engine Plant was shut down.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">General Electric T64</span> Turboshaft engine

The General Electric T64 is a free-turbine turboshaft engine that was originally developed for use on helicopters, but which was later used on fixed-wing aircraft as well. General Electric introduced the engine in 1964. The original engine design included technical innovations such as corrosion resistant and high-temperature coatings. The engine features a high overall pressure ratio, yielding a low specific fuel consumption for its time. Although the compressor is all-axial, like the earlier General Electric T58, the power turbine shaft is coaxial with the HP shaft and delivers power to the front of the engine, not rearwards. Fourteen compressor stages are required to deliver the required overall pressure ratio. Compressor handling is facilitated by 4 rows of variable stators. Unlike the T58, the power turbine has 2 stages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rolls-Royce RR500</span> Family of small gas turbine engines

The Rolls-Royce RR500 is a family of small gas turbine engines developed by Rolls-Royce Corporation. The RR500TP turboprop variant was intended for use in small aircraft. The RR500TS was the turboshaft variant designed for light helicopters. Development of the RR500 was abandoned in 2012.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">General Electric T31</span>

The General Electric T31 was the first turboprop engine designed and built in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Garrett TPF351</span> 1980s American turboprop engine

The Garrett TPF351 is a turboprop engine designed by Garrett Engine Division of AlliedSignal Aerospace Company. Initiated by Garrett in October 1987, the TPF351-20 engine was selected by Embraer to power the Embraer/FMA CBA 123 Vector, a high-speed commuter "pusher" aircraft. It was first tested on May 19, 1989 and then ground tested and flight tested on a Boeing 720 on July 9, 1990. The first prototype CBA 123 was tested on July 18, 1990, followed by a flight to the Farnborough Air Show in September of the same year. Both programs were cancelled in 1992, when the TPF351 was nine months from engine certification.

The Boeing T60 was a family of small turboshaft/turboprop engines produced by Boeing, based on Boeing's earlier Model 500 gas generator and Model 502 (T50) turboshaft engines.

Brake-specific fuel consumption (BSFC) is a measure of the fuel efficiency of any prime mover that burns fuel and produces rotational, or shaft power. It is typically used for comparing the efficiency of internal combustion engines with a shaft output.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Klimov TV2-117</span> 1960s Soviet turboshaft aircraft engine

The Klimov TV2-117 is a Soviet gas-turbine turboshaft engine intended for helicopter use. Designed in the early 1960s by the Isotov Design Bureau the engine became the first purpose built gas turbine engine for helicopter use by the Soviet Union with previous helicopter turbines being adapted aeroplane powerplants. It was later produced by Klimov, production ending in 1997.

The Allison T78 was a turboprop engine that first ran in March 1965. It used a regenerator that recovered and reused exhaust heat to reduce fuel consumption.

References

  1. ↑ Pouyan Asgharian, Reza Noroozian (2017). "Microturbine Generation Power Systems". Distributed Generation Systems Design, Operation and Grid Integration . Elsevier. pp. 149–219. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-804208-3.00004-2. ISBN   9780128042083.
  2. 1 2 3 Barney L. Capehart (Dec 22, 2016). "Microturbines". Whole Building Design Guide . National Institute of Building Sciences.
  3. 1 2 Stephen Gillette (Nov 1, 2010). "Microturbine Technology Matures". POWER magazine. Access Intelligence, LLC.
  4. 1 2 Jan Peirs (2008). "Ultra micro gas turbine generator". Department of Mechanical Engineering. KU Leuven. Archived from the original on 2005-12-20. Retrieved 2018-04-24.
  5. ↑ Asgharian, Pouyan; Noroozian, Reza (2016-05-10). "Modeling and simulation of microturbine generation system for simultaneous grid-connected/Islanding operation". 2016 24th Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE). pp. 1528–1533. doi:10.1109/IranianCEE.2016.7585764. ISBN   978-1-4673-8789-7. S2CID   44199656.
  6. ↑ "Prime Movers". The Irish Combined Heat & Power Association. Archived from the original on 2011-06-26.
  7. ↑ Ryousuke Shibata; et al. (November 2–7, 2003). The Development of 300kW Class High Efficiency Micro Gas Turbine "RGT3R". International Gas Turbine Congress Tokyo. Niigata Power Systems.
  8. ↑ "C200S". Capstone Turbine Corporation. Archived from the original on 2017-07-04. Retrieved 2020-04-22.
  9. ↑ I. Takehara; et al. (Jun 19, 2002). "Summary of CGT302 Ceramic Gas Turbine Research and Development Program". Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power. 124 (3): 627–635. doi:10.1115/1.1451704.
  10. ↑ "Kawasaki Microturbines". Forecast International. June 2004.
  11. ↑ Capstone Turbine Corporation (Oct 14, 2015). "Final Technical Report". High Efficiency 370kW Microturbine. doi: 10.2172/1224801 . OSTI   1224801.
  12. ↑ Matti Malkamäki; et al. (March 2015). "A HIGH EFFICIENCY MICROTURBINE CONCEPT". 11th European Conference on Turbomachinery Fluid Dynamics and Thermodynamics.
  13. ↑ Carter Palmer (August 7, 2018). "Microturbines: Back to Normalcy?". Forecast International. Archived from the original on August 7, 2018. Retrieved August 7, 2018.
  14. ↑ Genuth, Iddo (2007-02-07). "Engine on a Chip". The Future of Things. Retrieved 2016-06-21.
  15. ↑ Graham Warwick (Apr 23, 2018). "The Week In Technology, April 23-27, 2018". Aviation Week & Space Technology.
  16. ↑ "solutions : turboprop & turbogenerator". Turbotech.
  17. ↑ "TP100 Turboprop Engine". PBS Velká Bíteš.
  18. ↑ Graham Warwick (May 6, 2019). "The Week In Technology, May 6-10, 2019". Aviation Week & Space Technology.
  19. ↑ Garrett Reim (10 December 2019). "UAV Turbines unveils hybrid-electric 'microturbine' for drones". FlightGlobal.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.