Nazareth Inscription

Last updated
The inscription, in a facsimile from its original publication in 1930. Nazareth Inscription.jpg
The inscription, in a facsimile from its original publication in 1930.

The Nazareth Inscription or Nazareth decree is a marble tablet inscribed in Greek with an edict from an unnamed Caesar ordering capital punishment for anyone caught disturbing graves or tombs. [1] It is dated on the basis of epigraphy to the first half of the 1st century AD. Its provenance is unknown, but a French collector acquired the stone from Nazareth. It is now in the collections of the Louvre. [2] [3]

Contents

The text is read by scholars in the context of Roman law pertaining to exhumation and reburial, mentioned also by Pliny. [4] [5] The inscription is of interest to some authors for its indirect relationship to Jesus of Nazareth, even though the text contains no reference to him. A 2020 study of the marble's isotopes showed that the tablet came from a quarry in the Greek island of Kos, casting much doubt on the theory that it has any relationship to Jesus, and it may instead have been inscribed as a reaction to the desecration of the grave of the Kos tyrant Nikias circa 20 BCE. [6]

Description and provenance

Map of the Decapolis (cities in black) and nearby areas including unmarked Samaria which is the northern part of the Roman province of Judea. The-Decapolis-map.svg
Map of the Decapolis (cities in black) and nearby areas including unmarked Samaria which is the northern part of the Roman province of Judea.

The marble tablet measures 24 by 15 inches, with the koine Greek inscription appearing in fourteen lines. It was acquired in 1878 by Wilhelm Fröhner (1834–1925), and sent from Nazareth to Paris. Fröhner entered the item in his manuscript inventory with the note "Dalle de marbre envoyé de Nazareth en 1878." Though indicating that the marble was sent from Nazareth, the note does not state that it was discovered there. Nazareth was a significant antiquities market in the 1870s, as was Jerusalem, [7] and may have been "nothing more than … a shipping center" for the item. [8] Since 1925 it has been in the Bibliothèque nationale, Paris, displayed in the Cabinet des Médailles.

The inscription, with a facsimile, was published in 1930 by Franz Cumont, [9] who had been alerted to it by Rostovtseff. [7]

Text

The Greek used in the inscription is relatively poor. [10] Clyde E. Billington provides the following English translation: [11] [12]

Edict of Caesar
It is my decision [concerning] graves and tombs—whoever has made them for the religious observances of parents, or children, or household members—that these remain undisturbed forever. But if anyone legally charges that another person has destroyed, or has in any manner extracted those who have been buried, or has moved with wicked intent those who have been buried to other places, committing a crime against them, or has moved sepulcher-sealing stones, against such a person, I order that a judicial tribunal be created, just as [is done] concerning the gods in human religious observances, even more so will it be obligatory to treat with honor those who have been entombed. You are absolutely not to allow anyone to move [those who have been entombed]. But if [someone does], I wish that [violator] to suffer capital punishment under the title of tomb-breaker.

Violatio sepulchri ('tomb violation') was a crime under Roman law, as noted by Cicero (d. 43 BC). The Nazareth Inscription prescribes the death penalty for the offense. [13] A tomb at which funeral rites had been duly performed became a locus religiosus , belonging to the divine rather than to the human realm. [14] [13] :144 Roman Imperial tombstones are often inscribed with a curse (defixio) against anyone who desecrates the grave. [13] :144

Analysis

Coin showing image of Nikias of Kos, Ruler of Kos from c. 50 BCE to c. 20 BCE. The Nazareth inscription is believed by researchers to be in response to disturbing his grave. Nikias of Kos.jpg
Coin showing image of Nikias of Kos, Ruler of Kos from c. 50 BCE to c. 20 BCE. The Nazareth inscription is believed by researchers to be in response to disturbing his grave.

Scholars have analysed the language and style of the Nazareth inscription and attempted to date it. It has been discussed in the context of tomb-robbery in antiquity.

Francis de Zulueta dates the inscription, based on the style of lettering, to between 50 B.C. and A.D. 50, but most likely around the turn of the era. [15] As the text uses the plural form "gods", Zulueta concluded it most likely came from the Hellenized district of the Decapolis. Like Zulueta, J. Spencer Kennard, Jr. noted that the reference to "Caesar" indicated that "the inscription must have been derived from somewhere in Samaria or Decapolis; Galilee was ruled by a client-prince until the reign of Claudius". [8] :232

It was once of interest to historians of the New Testament. [7] :89 Some authors, citing the inscription's supposed Galilean origin, interpreted it as Imperial Rome's clear reaction to the empty tomb of Jesus [2] [7] :89 and specifically as an edict of Claudius, who reigned AD 41-54. [16] [17] If the inscription was originally set up in Galilee, it can date no earlier than 44, the year Roman rule was imposed there. [2]

However, the 2020 isotope study of the marble published in the Journal of Archaeological Science clarified the origin of the tablet and points to another interpretation. [18] The scientists took a sample from the back of the tablet, and used laser ablation to help determine the isotope ratio of the stone. [6] The enrichment of carbon 13 and depletion of Oxygen 18 allowed a confident identification of the source of the marble as the upper quarry in the island of Kos. The team proposed that the edict was issued by Augustus after the desecration of the tomb of the Kos tyrant Nikias. [19] [6]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Claudius</span> Roman emperor from AD 41 to 54

Tiberius Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus was a Roman emperor, ruling from AD 41 to 54. A member of the Julio-Claudian dynasty, Claudius was born to Drusus and Antonia Minor at Lugdunum in Roman Gaul, where his father was stationed as a military legate. He was the first Roman emperor to be born outside Italy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Julio-Claudian dynasty</span> Roman imperial dynasty

The Julio-Claudian dynasty comprised the first five Roman emperors: Augustus, Tiberius, Caligula, Claudius, and Nero.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nazareth</span> Largest city in the Northern District of Israel

Nazareth is the largest city in the Northern District of Israel. In 2022 its population was 78,007. Known as "the Arab capital of Israel", Nazareth serves as a cultural, political, religious, economic and commercial center for the Arab citizens of Israel. The inhabitants are predominantly Arab citizens of Israel, of whom 69% are Muslim and 30.9% Christian. The city also commands immense religious significance, deriving from its status as the hometown of Jesus, the central figure of Christianity and a prophet in Islam.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tacitus on Jesus</span> References by Roman historian and senator Tacitus to Christ

The Roman historian and senator Tacitus referred to Jesus, his execution by Pontius Pilate, and the existence of early Christians in Rome in his final work, Annals, book 15, chapter 44.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Epigraphy</span> Study of inscriptions or epigraphs as writing

Epigraphy is the study of inscriptions, or epigraphs, as writing; it is the science of identifying graphemes, clarifying their meanings, classifying their uses according to dates and cultural contexts, and drawing conclusions about the writing and the writers. Specifically excluded from epigraphy are the historical significance of an epigraph as a document and the artistic value of a literary composition. A person using the methods of epigraphy is called an epigrapher or epigraphist. For example, the Behistun inscription is an official document of the Achaemenid Empire engraved on native rock at a location in Iran. Epigraphists are responsible for reconstructing, translating, and dating the trilingual inscription and finding any relevant circumstances. It is the work of historians, however, to determine and interpret the events recorded by the inscription as document. Often, epigraphy and history are competences practised by the same person. Epigraphy is a primary tool of archaeology when dealing with literate cultures. The US Library of Congress classifies epigraphy as one of the auxiliary sciences of history. Epigraphy also helps identify a forgery: epigraphic evidence formed part of the discussion concerning the James Ossuary.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Epaphroditus (freedman of Nero)</span> 1st century Roman freedman and secretary to Emperor Nero

Tiberius Claudius Epaphroditus or Epaphroditos, was a freedman and secretary of the Roman Emperor Nero. He was later executed by Domitian for failing to prevent Nero's suicide.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Theophilus ben Ananus</span> High Priest of Israel 37-41 CE

Theophilus was the High Priest in the Second Temple in Jerusalem from 37 to 41 CE according to Josephus's Antiquities of the Jews. He was a member of one of the wealthiest and most influential Jewish families in Iudaea Province during the 1st century. A growing but still uncommon belief points to High Priest Theophilus as the person to whom the Gospel of Luke is addressed, but Theophilus is a common enough name that there are many other possibilities for the addressee of Luke's Gospel and the Acts of the Apostles. In its favor is the fact that in Luke Theophilus is called by the title Most Excellent (kratiste), indicating he held a political office like high priest, the ethnarch under the Romans. In Acts 1:1 he does not have this honorific indicating that he no longer held an office of the Roman government. This provides an unusual identifier that eliminates other candidates for whom such a change in office was not effected.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Herod Archelaus</span> Ethnarch of ancient Samaria, Judea, and Idumea

Herod Archelaus was the ethnarch of Samaria, Judea, and Idumea, including the cities Caesarea and Jaffa, for nine years. He was the son of Herod the Great and Malthace the Samaritan, brother of Herod Antipas, and half-brother of Herod II. Archelaus came to power after the death of his father Herod the Great in 4 BC, and ruled over one-half of the territorial dominion of his father. Archelaus was removed by the Roman emperor Augustus when Judaea province was formed under direct Roman rule, at the time of the Census of Quirinius.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stolen body hypothesis</span> Theory to explain the empty tomb of Jesus

The stolen body hypothesis posits that the body of Jesus Christ was stolen from his burial place. It theorises that his tomb was found empty not because he was resurrected, but because the body had been hidden somewhere else by the apostles or unknown persons. Both the stolen body hypothesis and the debate over it presume the basic historicity of the gospel accounts of the tomb discovery. The stolen body hypothesis finds the idea that the body was not in the tomb plausible – such a claim could be checked if early Christians made it – but considers it more likely that early Christians had been misled into believing the resurrection by the theft of Jesus's body.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Decimus Valerius Asiaticus</span> Roman consul in 35 and 46 AD

Decimus Valerius Asiaticus was a prominent Roman Senator of provincial origin. Asiaticus was twice consul: first in 35 as suffect consul with Aulus Gabinius Secundus as his colleague; second in 46 as ordinary consul with Marcus Junius Silanus as his colleague. He was the first man from Gaul to be admitted into the Roman Senate, as well as the first man from Gaul to attain the consulship.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Livia Medullina</span> Fiancee of Roman emperor Claudius (c. 6 BC - c. AD 10)

FuriaLivia Medullina Camilla was the second fiancee of the future Emperor Claudius.

Lucius Arruntius Camillus Scribonianus was a Roman senator, who was active during the reign of Tiberius. He was consul in AD 32. Ten years later, he revolted against the emperor Claudius, but was swiftly defeated.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Suetonius on Christians</span> Mentions of Christians by the historian Suetonius

The Roman historian Suetonius mentions early Christians and may refer to Jesus Christ in his work Lives of the Twelve Caesars. One passage in the biography of the Emperor Claudius Divus Claudius 25, refers to agitations in the Roman Jewish community and the expulsion of Jews from Rome by Claudius during his reign, which may be the expulsion mentioned in the Acts of the Apostles. In this context "Chresto" is mentioned. Some scholars see this as a likely reference to Jesus, while others see it as referring to another person living in Rome, of whom we have no information.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aizanoi</span> Ancient Greek city in western Anatolia

Aizanoi, Latinized as Aezani, was a Phrygian city in western Anatolia. It was located at the site of the modern village of Çavdarhisar, near Kütahya, on both sides of the Penkalas river, c. 1,000 m (3,300 ft) above sea level. The city was an important political and economic centre in Roman times; surviving remains from the period include a well-preserved Temple of Zeus, a combined theatre-stadium complex, and a round building, probably a macellum, inscribed with a copy of the Price Edict of Diocletian. The city fell into decline in Late Antiquity. In 2012 the site was submitted for inclusion on the UNESCO World Heritage List.

The gens Sedatia, occasionally written Sedata, was a plebeian family at ancient Rome, which flourished from the first to the third century. The only member of this gens known to have held a seat in the Roman senate was Marcus Sedatius Severianus, consul suffectus in AD 153.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Priene calendar inscription</span> 9 BC stone inscription about Augustus Caesar

The Priene calendar inscription is an inscription in stone recovered at Priene that records an edict by Paullus Fabius Maximus, proconsul of the Roman province of Asia and a decree of the conventus of the province accepting the edict from 9 BC. The documents align the provincial calendar with the Roman calendar, honouring Augustus by making the provincial year began on his birthday. It refers to Augustus' birth using the term "gospel." It is known as the Priene text because it was found on two stones in the marketplace of the ancient town of Priene. Other copies are known from Apamea and Eumeneia.

The gens Salvidiena was a plebeian family at ancient Rome. Members of this gens are first mentioned toward the end of the Republic, and from then to the end of the second century they regularly filled the highest offices of the Roman state.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nicias of Kos</span> 1st-century BC tyrant of Kos

Nicias, also known as Curtias Nicias, was a ruler of the island of Kos under Roman rule, during the Second Triumvirate and the early reign of Augustus. He is known from coinage, inscriptions, and anecdotes in ancient literary sources. Ancient sources call him a tyrant. The desecration of his tomb may have prompted the Nazareth Inscription.

The gens Traula, also found as Traulia or Traullia, was an obscure plebeian family of equestrian rank at ancient Rome. Only one member of this gens seems to be mentioned by Roman writers: Sextus Traulus Montanus, whom Claudius put to death in AD 48. A few others are known from inscriptions.

The gens Tuticana, sometimes written Tuticania, was an obscure plebeian family at ancient Rome. Only a few members of this gens are mentioned in history, but a number are known from inscriptions.

References

  1. Gager, John G. (1992). Curse tablets and binding spells from the ancient world. New York u.a.: Oxford Univ. Press. p. 179. ISBN   9780195062267.
  2. 1 2 3 Smallwood, E. Mary (1976). The Jews under Roman Rule: From Pompey to Diocletian: A Study in Political Relations. Leiden: Brill. p. 213.
  3. Millard, Alan (2000). Reading and writing in the time of Jesus. New York, NY: New York Univ. Press. p. 110. ISBN   9780814756379.
  4. Pliny, Epistles 10.68f.
  5. Phillips, C. Robert (2007), "Approaching Roman Religion: The Case for Wissenschaftsgeschichte", in Rüpke, Jörg (ed.), A companion to Roman religion ([Nachdr.]. ed.), Malden, Mass.: Blackwell, p. 14, ISBN   9781405129435
  6. 1 2 3 4 Gibbons, Ann (February 28, 2020). "Tablet thought to have guarded tombs after Jesus's death may not be what it seems". Science Magazine. Archived from the original on February 29, 2020. Retrieved February 29, 2020.
  7. 1 2 3 4 Metzger, Bruce M. (1980), "The Nazareth inscription once again", New Testament studies : philological, versional, and patristic, New Testament tools and studies, vol. 10, Leiden: Brill, pp. 75–94, ISBN   9004061630 Metzger gives a summary of discussion among New Testament scholars and ancient historians alike.
  8. 1 2 Kennard, J. Spencer (December 1955). "The Burial of Jesus". Journal of Biblical Literature. 74 (4): 227–238. doi:10.2307/3261668. JSTOR   3261668. noting the coincidental connection with the burial of Jesus made by Baldensperger, Cumont and Momigliano.
  9. Franz Cumont, "Un réscrit impérial sur la violation de sépulture" in Revue Historique163 1930:341-66.
  10. Elwell, Philip W.; Comfort, Walter A., eds. (2008). Tyndale Bible dictionary. Carol Stream, Ill.: Tyndale House Publishers. p. 939. ISBN   978-1-4143-1945-2.
  11. Billington, Clyde E. "The Nazareth Inscription: Proof of the Resurrection of Christ?". Artifax (Spring 2005).
  12. "SEG 8:13 - PHI Greek Inscriptions". epigraphy.packhum.org. Archived from the original on 2017-02-23. Retrieved 2017-02-23.
  13. 1 2 3 Kyle, Donald G. (1998). Spectacles of death in Ancient Rome. London: Routledge. pp. 143–144. ISBN   9780415096782. citing Cicero, De Legibus 3 and Digest 47.12, with additional citations of modern scholarship.
  14. Gaius, Inst. II.3, 6, 9; Clust. 3.44.2
  15. De Zulueta, F. (1932). "Violation of Sepulture in Palestine at the Beginning of the Christian Era". Journal of Roman Studies. 22 (2): 184–197. doi:10.2307/296822. JSTOR   296822. S2CID   164019744.
  16. Cadbury, Henry J. (1955). The book of Acts in history (2004 ed.). Eugene, Or.: Harper. p. 117. ISBN   978-1592449156.
  17. Green, Michael (1967). Man alive!. Downers Grove, Ill.: Inter-Varsity Press. p. 36. ISBN   9780877845379. "It is an imperial edict, belonging either to the reign of Tiberius (A.D. 14-37) or of Claudius (A.D. 41-54). And it is an invective, backed with heavy sanctions, against meddling around with tombs and graves! It looks very much as if the news of the empty tomb had got back to Rome in a garbled form. (Pontius Pilate would have had to report: and he would obviously have said that the tomb had been rifled). This edict, it seems, is the imperial reaction."
  18. Harper, Kyle; McCormick, Michael; Hamilton, Matthew; Chantal, Peiffert; Raymond, Michels; Engel, Michael (April 2020). "Establishing the provenance of the Nazareth Inscription: Using stable isotopes to resolve a historic controversy and trace ancient marble production" (PDF). Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports. 30: 102228. doi:10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102228. S2CID   212890727.
  19. Bower, Bruce (2020-03-20). "The Nazareth Inscription's origins may refute ties to Jesus' resurrection". Science News. Archived from the original on 2020-03-20. Retrieved 2020-03-21.