Quintus Marcius trilingual inscription

Last updated

Quintus Marcius trilingual inscription is a Latin-Greek-Punic trilingual inscription on a stone object found in Henchir-Alouin (near Uthina). [1]

Contents

The inscription is engraved on a stone lintel, or more probable, an altar, decorated in the top and the bottom with molding. [1] It was published as CIL VIII 24030. [2] It is currently in the Louvre. [3]

Inscription

The inscription reads: [4] [5]

(line 1 - Latin)Q. MARCI[us...]Quintus Marci[us...]Quintus Marci[us...]
(line 2 - Latin)PROTOMACVS [medicus...]Protomacus [medicus...]Protomacus [the Physician...]
(line 3 - Latin)FACTA. L(?). M. COS. M[...]facta L... M... Cos... M... [...]made ... [...]
(line 4 - Greek)ΚΟΥΙΝΚΤΟΣΜΑΡΚΙΟ[ς πρωτο...]Kouinktos Markio[s Prōto-...]Kouinktos Markio[s Proto-]
(line 5 - Greek)ΜΑΧΟΣΗΡΑΚΛΕΙΔΟ[υ ἰατρός...]-machos Herakleido[u iatros...]-machos Heracleide[s the doctor...]
(line 6 - Punic)
[המזבח? ז]𐤕?𐤉𐤕𐤍𐤒𐤉𐤍𐤈𐤀𐤌𐤏𐤓𐤒𐤉𐤐𐤓𐤈
[hmzbḥ? z]t ytn qynṭʾ mʿrqy prṭ-[This altar] gave Quintus Marcius Proto-]
(line 7 - Punic)
[מקא ה]𐤓𐤐𐤀𐤔𐤕𐤔𐤐𐤈𐤌𐤏𐤁𐤃𐤌𐤋𐤒𐤓𐤕𐤅𐤀𐤃𐤍𐤁<על>
[mqʾ h]rpʾ št špṭm ʿbdmlqrt wʾdnb<ʿl>[-makus the] doctor (in the) year of the Suffets Abdmelqart and Adonba<al>.

The length of the gap in first Latin line suggest it included the name of the father ("F(ilius) ..."). [6] The third line presents a difficulty: the abbreviations ("L(?). M. COS. M[...]") may mention a date, but can't be interpreted as the names of the Suffets Abdmelqart and Adonbaal; perhaps they were Duumviri of a neighboring colony. [6]

The Greek inscription presents the name of the dedicator, following a genitive and the restored "ἰατρός", corresponding with Latin "medicus". [6] However, the name Ἡρακλείδης corresponds with the Phoenician Abdmelqart; This fact makes a restoration like "ἄρχοντος" - which will make the Greek and Punic parts parallel - possible, although it doesn't explain the presence of only one Suffet, and hence it is simpler to see Herakleides as the father, following the tranditional Greek structure of such inscriptions. [7]

The beginning of the first line of the Punic inscription is reconstructed with uncertainty; Zayin and Taw in this version of the Punic/Neo-Punic script are similar, therefore the logical reconstructions are "[hmzbḥ z]t" ("th[is (female) altar") and "[hmzbḥ ʾ]z" ("th[is (male) altar"). [8] The last two letters of the second line, which end the name Adonbaal, seem to be missing. [9]

Dating

The lack of h in the Latin transcription of the name Protomacus help determine the date of the inscription: aspirations began to be noted in Latin around the time of Julius Caesar and Cicero, so although the transition was gradual, it is plausible to date the inscription to the middle of the first century BC. [10] The Phoenician script is between the Punic and the Neo-Punic phases, between the fall of Carthage and the beginning of the Christian era. [11] The Punic transcription of the foreign names does not preserve the suffix s (Quintus was pronounced "Quinte", and Marcius "Marqi"); the Latin K and Greek Κ are rendered by Punic Qoph, and the Latin T and Greek Τ are rendered by Punic Teth. [11]

Bilingual and even trilingual inscriptions for doctors are not rarity in Africa and elsewhere in the ancient world. [10] [12]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rabiria gens</span>

The gens Rabiria was a minor plebeian family at Ancient Rome. Although of senatorial rank, few members of this gens appear in history, and the only one known to have held any of the higher offices of the Roman state was Gaius Rabirius Postumus, who was praetor circa 48 or 47 BC.

Phoenician is an extinct Canaanite Semitic language originally spoken in the region surrounding the cities of Tyre and Sidon. Extensive Tyro-Sidonian trade and commercial dominance led to Phoenician becoming a lingua franca of the maritime Mediterranean during the Iron Age. The Phoenician alphabet spread to Greece during this period, where it became the source of all modern European scripts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Punic language</span> Extinct ancient Phoenician language

The Punic language, also called Phoenicio-Punic or Carthaginian, is an extinct variety of the Phoenician language, a Canaanite language of the Northwest Semitic branch of the Semitic languages. An offshoot of the Phoenician language of coastal West Asia, it was principally spoken on the Mediterranean coast of Northwest Africa, the Iberian peninsula and several Mediterranean islands, such as Malta, Sicily, and Sardinia by the Punic people, or western Phoenicians, throughout classical antiquity, from the 8th century BC to the 6th century AD.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tarquinia gens</span> Ancient Roman family

The gens Tarquinia was a plebeian family at ancient Rome, usually associated with Lucius Tarquinius Priscus and Lucius Tarquinius Superbus, the fifth and seventh Kings of Rome. Most of the Tarquinii who appear in history are connected in some way with this dynasty, but a few appear during the later Republic, and others from inscriptions, some dating as late as the fourth century AD.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Multilingual inscription</span> Inscription that includes the same text in two languages

In epigraphy, a multilingual inscription is an inscription that includes the same text in two or more languages. A bilingual is an inscription that includes the same text in two languages. Multilingual inscriptions are important for the decipherment of ancient writing systems, and for the study of ancient languages with small or repetitive corpora.

The gens Afrania was a plebeian family at Rome, which is first mentioned in the second century BC. The first member of this gens to achieve prominence was Gaius Afranius Stellio, who became praetor in 185 BC.

The gens Tineia was a Roman family of imperial times. Members of this gens first appear in history in the time of Hadrian; the first to obtain the consulship was Quintus Tineius Rufus in AD 127.

The gens Maevia, occasionally written Mevia, was a minor plebeian family at ancient Rome. Members of this gens are known from the later Republic, although the family may possibly have been much older, and well into Imperial times. None of the Maevii ever obtained the higher offices of the Roman state. Their nomen is frequently confounded with the similar Maenius.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nasidia gens</span> Plebeian family at Rome

The gens Nasidia was an obscure plebeian family at Rome. The gens is best known from Quintus Nasidius, one of the admirals of Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus during the Civil War. Although none of the Nasidii are known to have held any of the higher offices of the Roman state, a number are known from inscriptions. A coin of this gens depicts the head of Pompeius and a trident on the obverse, and on the reverse a ship, with the inscription Q. Nasidius.

The gens Nautia was an old patrician family at ancient Rome. The first of the gens to obtain the consulship was Spurius Nautius Rutilus in 488 BC, and from then until the Samnite Wars the Nautii regularly filled the highest offices of the Roman Republic. After that time, the Nautii all but disappear from the record, appearing only in a handful of inscriptions, mostly from Rome and Latium. A few Nautii occur in imperial times, including a number who appear to have been freedmen, and in the provinces.

The gens Orbicia was an obscure plebeian family of ancient Rome. None of its members are known to have held any magistracies, but several are known from inscriptions. The name may be best remembered from Orbicius, perhaps a Byzantine military strategist of uncertain date, credited with the authorship of a short treatise on the Byzantine army.

The gens Orfia was a minor plebeian family at Rome. Few members of this gens are mentioned by ancient writers, but others are known from inscriptions. The best-known may be Marcus Orfius, a military tribune who served under the command of Caesar.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Persia gens</span> Families from Ancient Rome who shared the Persius nomen

The gens Persia was a minor plebeian family at ancient Rome. Members of this gens are first mentioned during the Second Punic War, but they only occasionally occur in history. The most illustrious of the family was the satirist Aulus Persius Flaccus, who lived during the middle part of the first century.

The gens Pleminia was a minor plebeian family at ancient Rome. The only member of this gens mentioned in history is Quintus Pleminius, infamous for his outrageous conduct at Locri during the Second Punic War. Other Pleminii are known from inscriptions.

The gens Praeconia, occasionally written Preconia, was an obscure plebeian family at ancient Rome. No members of this gens are mentioned in history, but a few are known from inscriptions.

The gens Satriena was an obscure plebeian family at ancient Rome. No members of this gens obtained any of the higher offices of the Roman state, but a number are known from coins and inscriptions.

The gens Silicia, possibly the same as Selicia, was an obscure plebeian family at ancient Rome. Hardly any members of this gens are mentioned in history, but a number are known from inscriptions, many of them from Roman Africa.

The gens Spurinnia was a minor plebeian family of Etruscan descent at ancient Rome. No members of this gens are mentioned in ancient writers, but several are known from inscriptions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pauli Gerrei trilingual inscription</span> Stele with Greek-Latin-Phoenician inscription

The Pauli Gerrei trilingual inscription is a trilingual Greek-Latin-Phoenician inscription on the base of a bronze column found in San Nicolò Gerrei in Sardinia in 1861. The stele was discovered by a notary named Michele Cappai, on the right side of the Strada statale 387 del Gerrei that descends towards Ballao.

The gens Turia, occasionally written Turria, was a minor plebeian family at ancient Rome. Several members of this gens are mentioned by Roman writers, although none of them ever obtained the consulship. Lucius Turius, who stood for the consulship in the late Republic, was praetor in 75 BC.

References

  1. 1 2 Berger & Cagnat 1899, pp. 48–49.
  2. ↑ Mezhoud, Lilia (2018). "Discussion autour d'un fragment de texte". Academia.edu (in French).
  3. ↑ "autel (AO 3240)". Louvre Collections.
  4. ↑ Berger & Cagnat 1899, pp. 49–53.
  5. ↑ "Archaeological Discussions". American Journal of Archaeology. 3 (4/5): 596. 1899. doi:10.2307/496763. ISSN   0002-9114.
  6. 1 2 3 Berger & Cagnat 1899, p. 51.
  7. ↑ Berger & Cagnat 1899, pp. 51–52.
  8. ↑ Berger & Cagnat 1899, p. 49.
  9. ↑ Berger & Cagnat 1899, p. 50.
  10. 1 2 Berger & Cagnat 1899, p. 52.
  11. 1 2 Berger & Cagnat 1899, p. 53.
  12. ↑ cf. CIL I 1256; VIII 15, 16, 21105.

Bibliography

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.