Pointing

Last updated
Children pointing at a Joshua Tree in Joshua Tree National Park Children pointing at a Joshua Tree.jpg
Children pointing at a Joshua Tree in Joshua Tree National Park

Pointing is a gesture specifying a direction from a person's body, usually indicating a location, person, event, thing or idea. It typically is formed by extending the arm, hand, and index finger, although it may be functionally similar to other hand gestures. Types of pointing may be subdivided according to the intention of the person, as well as by the linguistic function it serves.

Contents

Pointing typically develops within the first two years of life in humans, and plays an important role in language development and reading in children. It is central to the use of sign language, with a large number of signs being some variation on pointing. The nature of pointing may differ for children who have autism or who are deaf, and may also vary by gender. It is typically not observed in children who are blind from birth.

Pointing may vary substantially across cultures, with some having many distinct types of pointing, both with regard to the physical gestures employed and their interpretation. Pointing, especially at other people, may be considered inappropriate or rude in certain contexts and in many cultures. It is generally regarded as a species-specific human feature that does not normally occur in other primates in the wild. It has been observed in animals in captivity; however, there is disagreement on the nature of this non-human pointing.

Definition and types

A diver pointing to their eyes as a standard hand symbol that something should be looked at by another Diving signal look.jpg
A diver pointing to their eyes as a standard hand symbol that something should be looked at by another

The primary purpose of pointing is to indicate a direction, location, event or thing relative to a person. [2] [lower-alpha 1] [3] Pointing is typically defined as having either three or four essential elements:

  1. Extension of the index finger;
  2. Flexing the remaining fingers into the palm, possibly with the thumb to the side;
  3. Usually, but not always, the pronation of the palm to face downward, or to face the mid-line of the body; and
  4. Extension of the arm. [2] [4]

Gestures that do not meet these three or four criteria are usually classified as a "reach" or an “indicative gesture”, although there is no clear consensus on how to differentiate between the two. Additionally, there may be little or no behavioral or functional difference depending on whether a gesture is considered to be pointing, reaching, or otherwise indicative, and reaching may be considered a form of whole-hand pointing. [4] In one review, 11 separate definitions were identified for the related motions of reach, reaching out, reaching, indicating, and indicates. [4]

Imperative, declarative and interrogative pointing

Types of pointing are traditionally further divided by purpose, between imperative and declarative pointing. [5] Imperative pointing is pointing to make a request for an object, while declarative pointing is pointing to declare, to comment on an object. As Kovacs and colleagues phrases it, "'Give that to me' vs. 'I like that'". [6] This division is similar to that made by Harris and Butterworth between "giving" and "communicative" pointing. [7] :157–8 Determining the intention of pointing in infants is done by considering three factors:

  1. Whether the behavior is direct toward another,
  2. Whether it includes "visual-orientation behaviors" such as observing the recipient of the pointing in addition to the object pointed to, and
  3. Whether the gesture is repeated if it fails to achieve the intended effect on the recipient. [8]

Declarative pointing may further be divided into declarative expressive pointing, to express feelings about a thing, and declarative interrogative pointing, to seek information about a thing. [8] However, according to Kovacs and colleagues interrogative pointing is clearly different from declarative pointing, since its function is to gain new information about a referent to learn from a knowledgeable addressee. [6] Therefore, unlike declarative pointing, interrogative pointing implies an asymmetric epistemic relation between communicative partners.

Linguistic function

Chiffre "un" en Chine.JPG
"Number one"
Chiffre "huit" en Chine.JPG
"Number eight"

Types of communicative pointing may be divided by linguistic function into three main groups: [9] :43

  1. Objective pointing: pointing to an object within the visual field of both the pointer and the receiver, such as pointing to a chair which is physically present [lower-alpha 2]
  2. Syntactic or anaphoric pointing: pointing to linguistic entities or expressions previously identified, such as pointing to the chair which is not physically present [lower-alpha 3]
  3. Imaginative pointing: pointing to things that exist in the imagination, such as pointing to a fictional or remembered chair [lower-alpha 4]

Additionally, pointing in children who are deaf may be divided between diectic or "natural" pointing, which is shared with hearing children, and symbolic pointing used specifically in sign language, learned by observing and imitating others who sign. [11] :34

Development

Pointing is the first communicative gesture that develops in human infants. [12] It is not clear to what extent the behavior may first emerge as a form of meaningless ritualization, [lower-alpha 5] whether some infants may comprehend and visually follow the pointing of others without yet pointing themselves, or whether pointing begins as a form of meaningful imitation, where an infant learns they can produce the same effect in adults as adult produce in them, by mimicking the action of pointing, and drawing attention to an object. [11] :33–4

Pointing generally emerges within the first two years of life, weeks prior to a baby's first spoken word, and plays a central role in language acquisition. [2] [lower-alpha 6] [13] :352 The onset of pointing behavior is typically between seven and 15 months of age, with an average of between 11 months and one year. [13] :353 By eight months, parents reported that 33% of babies exhibited pointing behaviors, with pointing to nearby objects usually occurring by 11 months, and pointing to more distant object by 13 months. [2] By one year of age, more than half of children will exhibit pointing behavior. [4]

As early as 10 months of age, children have been shown to spend more time being attentive to novel objects when they are pointed to by others, when compared to objects that are merely presented to them. This time is increased if the object is also labelled verbally. Pointing by children is associated with a high rate of verbal response from adults, specifically labeling the object pointed to. [7] :129 This interaction allows the child to check for words labeling object they do not yet know, and, when combined with declarative verbal statements on the part of the child, may allow them verify the accuracy of words they have already learned. [14] :62

Infants may begin to point in situations where no one else is present, as a form of egocentric expression, termed "pointing-for-self". This is differentiated from "pointing-for-others" which is done while looking at a "recipient" of the pointing, and done as a communicative gesture. [13] :353–4 Kita specifies this variety of pointing in the context of being a deictic gesture, which is done for the benefit of an audience, as distinct from what are deemed "superficially similar behaviors". [2] Demonstrating this, as they mature infants will first point at an object, and then visually verify whether the recipient is being attentive to the object, and by 15 months of age, will first verify that they have the attention of the recipient, and only then point as a means of redirecting that attention. [7] :157

Children are more likely to point for adults who respond positively to the gesture. At 16 months they are less likely to point for adults who are shown to be unreliable, adults who have mislabeled objects the children already know the correct word for. [lower-alpha 7] At two years of age, children have been shown to be more likely to point for adults than for children their own age. [6]

Relationship with language

Pointing and labeling objects plays an important role in language acquisition, and children tend to be more attentive to objects pointed to by others, as well as to objects pointed to that are verbally labeled. Pointing (3454365347).jpg
Pointing and labeling objects plays an important role in language acquisition, and children tend to be more attentive to objects pointed to by others, as well as to objects pointed to that are verbally labeled.

A meta-analysis by Colonnesi and colleagues found a strong relationship between pointing and language, including between pointing at an early age and language ability in later life, and pointing at an early age as a predictor of two-word vocal combinations. They concluded that only a "few studies" had not found a strong correlation between pointing and the development of language. [13] :354 Research has also shown that the frequency of communicative pointing from ages 9 months to 12.5 months was positively correlated with vocabulary size for children at age two. [15] [lower-alpha 8] The relationship between language development and pointing tends to be stronger in studies which examined declarative pointing specifically or pointing generally, rather than imperative pointing. [13] :355,361

In school age children, finger-pointing-reading (reading while pointing to words or letters as they are spoken) can play an important role in reading development, by helping to emphasize the association between the spoken and printed word, and encouraging children to be attentive to the meaning of text. [16] :36–7

Deaf speakers of sign language

Pointing plays an important role in sign language, which as much as 25% of signs being a variation of pointing. [2] [lower-alpha 9] Children who are deaf have been shown to begin pointing at a similar age to non-deaf children, but this did not confer any advantage in the acquisition of pronouns in American Sign Language. [13] :353–4

Initial observations give some indication that deaf children acquiring the use of American Sign Language (ASL) may exhibit self-pointing behavior earlier than hearing children who are acquiring speech. [17] Pointing to a location begins being deictic for deaf children and hearing alike, but becomes lexicalized for more mature signers. There is a distinction between linguistic pointing in ASL and gestural pointing by deaf users, the latter being identical for deaf and hearing people. [18]

One small-scale study found that the errors in pointing behavior produced by autistic deaf children and autistic hearing children were similar. [19] Both deaf and hearing children use pointing abundantly while learning language, and initially for the same reason, although that starts to diverge as deaf children acquire signs. Pre-verbal hearing infants use pointing extensively, and use a combination of one word plus one gesture (mostly pointing) before they can produce a two-word sentence. Another study looked at deaf Japanese infants acquiring language from ages four months to two years, and found that the infants moved from duos (where a point plus an iconic sign referred to the same thing) to two-sign combinations where they referred to two different things. As they grew, the latter grew more frequent and led to the development of two-sign sentences in Japanese Sign Language. [20]

Those with autism

A woman along with a child with autism pointing at fish in an aquarium Opening a window to the autistic brain.jpg
A woman along with a child with autism pointing at fish in an aquarium

Children with autism show marked differences compared to others, and greater difficulty in their ability to interpret pointing as a form of communication, and a sign of "something interesting". This is similar to difficulties they may experience with other deictic communication, which depend on an interpretation of the relationship between speaker and listener or on particular spatial references. [7] :159 A lack of declarative or proto-declarative pointing and the inability to follow a point are important diagnostic criteria for children with autism, and have been incorporated into screening tools such as the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers. [11] :34 [21]

Other factors

Pointing is dependent on vision, and is not observed in children who are blind from birth. [2] A number of differences have been observed regarding the onset of pointing behavior and gender, and the tendency to point using the right or left hand, with girls being more likely to point up to 15 degrees into the left visual periphery using their right hand, and being ambidextrous further to the left, while boys are typically ambidextrous for 15 degrees to the left and right of center. [2]

Cultural variations

Iranian scholar Mohammad Khatami pointing during a speech given at the Mausoleum of Ruhollah Khomeini in 2003 Mohammad Khatami - November 19, 2003 - Laylat al-Qadr speech in Mausoleum of Ruhollah Khomeini.png
Iranian scholar Mohammad Khatami pointing during a speech given at the Mausoleum of Ruhollah Khomeini in 2003

The gestures used for pointing and their interpretation vary among different cultures. [22] [23] While studies have observed index finger pointing in infants across a range of cultures, because those studied are also ones where adults frequently use this type of pointing, further study is needed to determine whether these are examples of imitation of behaviors performed by observed adults, or whether it indicates pointing may be biologically determined. [2] [lower-alpha 10]

In much of the world, pointing with the index finger is considered rude or disrespectful, especially pointing to a person. [24] Pointing with the left hand is taboo in some cultures. [25] Pointing with an open hand is considered more polite or respectful in some contexts. [26] :51 In Nicaragua, pointing is frequently done with the lips in a "kiss shape" directed towards the object of attention.

Different cultures may point using a range of variations on index finger pointing. In Japan, pointing is done with the fingers together and the palm facing upwards. [27] [ page needed ] [28] [ page needed ] [29] [ page needed ] Those of Indian heritage may point using the chin, whole hand, or thumb. They may consider index finger pointing rude, but further distinguish a point using two fingers for use only at someone considered inferior. [30] :12 In those living near the Vaupés River, Dixon noted at least three distinct types of pointing:

pointing with the lips for "visible and near" ... pointing with the lips plus a backwards tilt of the head for "visible and not near" ... pointing with the index finger for "not visible" (if the direction in which the object lies is known) [25] :69

Alternatively, among Aboriginal Australian speakers of Arrernte, researchers identified six distinct types of pointing: index finger, open hand palm down, open hand palm vertical, "'horn-hand' pointing (with the thumb, the index finger and the pinkie extended)", pointing with a protruded lip, and pointing with the eye. [25] :69

When pointing to indicate a position in time, many, but not all cultures tend to point toward the front to indicate events in the future, and toward the back to indicate events in the past. One noted exception is that of speakers of Aymara, who instead tend to associate what is in the past, what is known, with what is in the front, what is seen, and vice versa. [25] :71

In non-human animals

There is considerable disagreement as to the nature of pointing behaviors in non-human animals. Miklósi and Soproni described pointing as a "species specific, human communicative gesture" not regularly used by any other species of primates living in the wild. [31] :82 Kita concluded similarly that "on the evidence to date only humans use the pointing gesture declarative to share attention with conspecifics." [2] Kovács and colleagues state "pointing as a referential communicative act seems to be unique to human behavior." [6] [lower-alpha 11]

However, the claims that pointing is a unique human gesture have not gone unchallenged. A study in 1998 by Veà and Sabater-Pi described examples of explicit declarative pointing in bonobos in what is now the Democratic Republic of the Congo through these observations: “Noises are heard coming from the vegetation. A young male swings from a branch and leaps into a tree... He emits sharp calls, which are answered by other individuals who are not visible. He points—with his right arm stretched out and his hand half closed except for his index and ring fingers—to the position of the two groups of camouflaged observers who are in the undergrowth.” [32] This was one of the only observations of pointing in the wild by primates for years, but recently other possible examples have been documented. [33] [ self-published source ] Researchers claimed to observe imperative pointing gestures produced by bonobos when attempting to initiate genital rubbing, [34] as well as by chimpanzees when reaching towards objects they desired, [35] although even these researchers admitted the rarity of chimpanzee pointing in the wild. [35] In the wild, both chimpanzees and bonobos have been shown to seemingly signal and gesture to direct each other’s attention, through acts like beckoning [36] and “directed scratching.” [37] Thus, while it is clear that other primates use gestures to direct attention, it is still uncertain as to whether this is done overtly as in humans through pointing. [33] [ self-published source ]

Although the question of whether primates point in the wild is still up for debate, pointing in captivity is widely established in primates. Leavens and Hopkins note that pointing behavior has been observed in captivity for a range of species. In some, such as apes, the majority of such behavior is spontaneous (meaning without explicit training to do so), but occurs only rarely in others, such as monkeys. [4] When present, this may be accompanied by visual monitoring of the person being interacted with, the audience of their gesture, rather than being attentive only to the object pointed at. [4] Moreover, it seems that non-human great apes also take the perspective of the communicative partner in order to produce clear, unambiguous points. [38] Studies have found that apes point with the dual goal of directing attention and requesting food, and additionally that they are sensitive to the looking behavior in response to their pointing gestures. [39] There remain questions as to whether this constitutes "true pointing", [14] :71 and whether non-humans have the social or cognitive abilities to understand the intentional communicative nature of pointing. [40] :124 These questions arise especially due to the nature of these primate pointing gestures. They are only produced for humans and not for other apes, and often use the full hand instead of the typical extended index finger that humans use. [41] However, this may be countered with observations in apes trained to use sign language, which do point with the index finger. [41] Recently, studies have also indicated that chimpanzees in captivity use pointing as a flexible signal, by raising their arms in order to point to objects that are further away. [42] [43] Thus, while apes certainly can point, it is difficult to ascertain whether they point naturally. However, this debate may result from the fact that there are procedural differences in how non-human primates are tested, making it more difficult to ascertain if non-human primates do point. [44] The experimenter must be safe, as a result of testing non-human primates, thus a barrier is introduced between the participant and experimenter. Dogs and infants do not have this precaution. However, Udell and colleagues [45] [46] tested dogs with and without a fence, using the object choice task in a similar manner to that of a barrier. The authors reported that the barrier produced a decrease of 31% in terms of success for canines. This has also been shown in pointing as well, where barriers that are present for dogs showed lower success rates than when absent, [47] highlighting that this debate may be partially the result of systematic procedural differences.

In contrast to the production of pointing, some non-human animal species can appropriately respond to pointing gestures, preferring an object or direction, which was previously indicated by the gesture. Cats, [48] elephants, [49] ferrets, [50] horses [51] and seals [52] can follow the pointing gesture of a human above chance, while dogs can rely on different types of human points [53] and their performance is comparable to that of 2-year-old toddlers in a similar task. [54] However, it seems, that the default function of pointing is different in dogs and humans, because pointing actions refer to particular locations or directions for dogs [55] in an imperative manner, while these gestures usually indicate specific objects in humans to ask for new information or to comment on an object. [6]

There is considerable debate as to whether apes are able to comprehend pointing gestures as well, and it has even been argued that dogs are better able to understand pointing than apes. Some hypothesize that pointing comprehension should be more prevalent in species with a stronger tendency to cooperate, which would explain negative results in apes due to the mainly competitive relationship present in most species of apes and monkeys. [31] However, wolves fare poorly in pointing comprehension tests as well, and are a highly cooperative species, countering this hypothesis. [31] More recent studies have refuted the claim that apes are poor at comprehending pointing, and provide evidence that the tests used to evaluate pointing comprehension are often inaccurate, especially in apes. [56] Thus there is conflicting evidence and debate as to whether apes fully comprehend pointing gestures.

See also

Notes

  1. "The prototypical pointing gesture is a communicative body movement that projects a vector from a body part. This vector indicates a certain direction, location or object." [2]
  2. "deixis ad oculos et aures", or "referent in the domain of common accessibility of speaker and hearer" [10] :226
  3. "to something which is to be looked for and found in places of speech" [10] :226
  4. "deixis at the phantasma" ... "situations of recollection and imagination similar to perception" [10] :226
  5. For example, if an infant receives positive interaction when pointing, they may begin to point as a means of gaining positive interaction itself, and not as a means of intentional communication. [11] :33
  6. "Pointing emerges out of its antecedent behaviors, such as undirected extension of the index finger, several weeks before the first spoken word." [2]
  7. For example, labeling a cat as a ball, citing Begus K, Southgate V. Infant pointing serves an interrogative function. Developmental Science. 2012;15:611–617. [6]
  8. This was true for both users of sign language and spoken word. [15]
  9. "...pointing is ubiquitous in our day-to-day interactions with others. ...Even when we talk about the referents that are distance in space and time, we often point to the seemingly empty space in front of us. ...'every four signs in signed discourse is a pointing sign'" [2]
  10. "Is infants' index-finger pointing a biologically programmed choice? ... A more conclusive answer to these questions requires a future study ... in a culture where adults do not use index-finger pointing at all or do so only rarely." [2]
  11. Referencing Tomasello M. Why We Collaborate? MIT Press; Cambridge: 2009. [6]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chimpanzee</span> Great ape native to the forest and savannah of tropical Africa

The chimpanzee, also known as simply the chimp, is a species of great ape native to the forests and savannahs of tropical Africa. It has four confirmed subspecies and a fifth proposed one. When its close relative the bonobo was more commonly known as the pygmy chimpanzee, this species was often called the common chimpanzee or the robust chimpanzee. The chimpanzee and the bonobo are the only species in the genus Pan. Evidence from fossils and DNA sequencing shows that Pan is a sister taxon to the human lineage and is humans' closest living relative. The chimpanzee is covered in coarse black hair, but has a bare face, fingers, toes, palms of the hands, and soles of the feet. It is larger and more robust than the bonobo, weighing 40–70 kg (88–154 lb) for males and 27–50 kg (60–110 lb) for females and standing 150 cm.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gesture</span> Form of non-verbal/non-vocal communication

A gesture is a form of non-verbal communication or non-vocal communication in which visible bodily actions communicate particular messages, either in place of, or in conjunction with, speech. Gestures include movement of the hands, face, or other parts of the body. Gestures differ from physical non-verbal communication that does not communicate specific messages, such as purely expressive displays, proxemics, or displays of joint attention. Gestures allow individuals to communicate a variety of feelings and thoughts, from contempt and hostility to approval and affection, often together with body language in addition to words when they speak. Gesticulation and speech work independently of each other, but join to provide emphasis and meaning.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Animal language</span> Complex animal communication

Animal languages are forms of non-human animal communication that show similarities to human language. Animals communicate through a variety of signs, such as sounds or movements. Signing among animals may be considered a form of language if the inventory of signs is large enough. The signs are relatively arbitrary, and the animals seem to produce them with a degree of volition. In experimental tests, animal communication may also be evidenced through the use of lexigrams by chimpanzees and bonobos.

In psychology, theory of mind refers to the capacity to understand other people by ascribing mental states to them. A theory of mind includes the knowledge that others' beliefs, desires, intentions, emotions, and thoughts may be different from one's own. Possessing a functional theory of mind is crucial for success in everyday human social interactions. People utilise a theory of mind when analyzing, judging, and inferring others' behaviors. The discovery and development of theory of mind primarily came from studies done with animals and infants. Factors including drug and alcohol consumption, language development, cognitive delays, age, and culture can affect a person's capacity to display theory of mind. Having a theory of mind is similar to but not identical with having the capacity for empathy or sympathy.

The origin of language, its relationship with human evolution, and its consequences have been subjects of study for centuries. Scholars wishing to study the origins of language must draw inferences from evidence such as the fossil record, archaeological evidence, contemporary language diversity, studies of language acquisition, and comparisons between human language and systems of communication existing among animals. Many argue that the origins of language probably relate closely to the origins of modern human behavior, but there is little agreement about the facts and implications of this connection.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Great ape language</span> Efforts to teach non-human primates to communicate with humans

Research into great ape language has involved teaching chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas and orangutans to communicate with humans and each other using sign language, physical tokens, lexigrams, and imitative human speech. Some primatologists argue that the use of these communication methods indicate primate "language" ability, though this depends on one's definition of language.

Dog intelligence or dog cognition is the process in dogs of acquiring information and conceptual skills, and storing them in memory, retrieving, combining and comparing them, and using them in new situations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Index finger</span> Second finger of the human hand

The index finger is the second digit of a human hand. It is located between the thumb and the middle finger. It is usually the most dextrous and sensitive digit of the hand, though not the longest. It is shorter than the middle finger, and may be shorter or longer than the ring finger.

The Mind of an Ape is a 1983 book by David Premack and his wife Ann James Premack. The authors argue that it is possible to teach language to (non-human) great apes. They write: "We now know that someone who comprehends speech must know language, even if he or she cannot produce it."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Knuckle-walking</span> Form of quadrupedal walking using the knuckles

Knuckle-walking is a form of quadrupedal walking in which the forelimbs hold the fingers in a partially flexed posture that allows body weight to press down on the ground through the knuckles. Gorillas and chimpanzees use this style of locomotion, as do anteaters and platypuses.

Comparative cognition is the comparative study of the mechanisms and origins of cognition in various species, and is sometimes seen as more general than, or similar to, comparative psychology. From a biological point of view, work is being done on the brains of fruit flies that should yield techniques precise enough to allow an understanding of the workings of the human brain on a scale appreciative of individual groups of neurons rather than the more regional scale previously used. Similarly, gene activity in the human brain is better understood through examination of the brains of mice by the Seattle-based Allen Institute for Brain Science, yielding the freely available Allen Brain Atlas. This type of study is related to comparative cognition, but better classified as one of comparative genomics. Increasing emphasis in psychology and ethology on the biological aspects of perception and behavior is bridging the gap between genomics and behavioral analysis.

Gestures in language acquisition are a form of non-verbal communication involving movements of the hands, arms, and/or other parts of the body. Children can use gesture to communicate before they have the ability to use spoken words and phrases. In this way gestures can prepare children to learn a spoken language, creating a bridge from pre-verbal communication to speech. The onset of gesture has also been shown to predict and facilitate children's spoken language acquisition. Once children begin to use spoken words their gestures can be used in conjunction with these words to form phrases and eventually to express thoughts and complement vocalized ideas.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Joint attention</span> When two people focus on something at once

Joint attention or shared attention is the shared focus of two individuals on an object. It is achieved when one individual alerts another to an object by means of eye-gazing, pointing or other verbal or non-verbal indications. An individual gazes at another individual, points to an object and then returns their gaze to the individual. Scaife and Bruner were the first researchers to present a cross-sectional description of children's ability to follow eye gaze in 1975. They found that most eight- to ten-month-old children followed a line of regard, and that all 11- to 14-month-old children did so. This early research showed it was possible for an adult to bring certain objects in the environment to an infant's attention using eye gaze.

A talking animal or speaking animal is any non-human animal that can produce sounds or gestures resembling those of a human language. Several species or groups of animals have developed forms of communication which superficially resemble verbal language, however, these usually are not considered a language because they lack one or more of the defining characteristics, e.g. grammar, syntax, recursion, and displacement. Researchers have been successful in teaching some animals to make gestures similar to sign language, although whether this should be considered a language has been disputed.

Primate cognition is the study of the intellectual and behavioral skills of non-human primates, particularly in the fields of psychology, behavioral biology, primatology, and anthropology.

Manual babbling is a linguistic phenomenon that has been observed in deaf children and hearing children born to deaf parents who have been exposed to sign language. Manual babbles are characterized by repetitive movements that are confined to a limited area in front of the body similar to the sign-phonetic space used in sign languages. In their 1991 paper, Pettito and Marentette concluded that between 40% and 70% of deaf children's manual activity can be classified as manual babbling, whereas manual babbling accounts for less than 10% of hearing children’s manual activity. Manual Babbling appears in both deaf and hearing children learning American Sign Language from 6 to 14 months old.

Culture and social cognition is the relationship between human culture and human cognitive capabilities. Cultural cognitive evolution proposes that humans’ unique cognitive capacities are not solely due to biological inheritance, but are in fact due in large part to cultural transmission and evolution. Modern humans and great apes are separated evolutionarily by about six million years. Proponents of cultural evolution argue that this would not have been enough time for humans to develop the advanced cognitive capabilities required to create tools, language, and build societies through biological evolution. Biological evolution could not have individually produced each of these cognitive capabilities within that period of time. Instead, humans must have evolved the capacity to learn through cultural transmission. This provides a more plausible explanation that would fit within the given time frame. Instead of having to biologically account for each cognitive mechanism that distinguishes modern humans from previous relatives, one would only have to account for one significant biological adaptation for cultural learning. According to this view, the ability to learn through cultural transmission is what distinguishes humans from other primates. Cultural learning allows humans to build on existing knowledge and make collective advancements, also known as the “ratchet effect”. The ratchet effect simply refers to the way in which humans continuously add on to existing knowledge through modifications and improvements. This unique ability distinguishes humans from related primates, who do not seem to build collaborative knowledge over time. Instead, primates seem to build individual knowledge, in which the expertise of one animal is not built on by others, and does not progress across time.

Theory of mind in animals is an extension to non-human animals of the philosophical and psychological concept of theory of mind (ToM), sometimes known as mentalisation or mind-reading. It involves an inquiry into whether non-human animals have the ability to attribute mental states to themselves and others, including recognition that others have mental states that are different from their own. To investigate this issue experimentally, researchers place non-human animals in situations where their resulting behavior can be interpreted as supporting ToM or not.

The first half of the topic of agency deals with the behavioral sense, or outward expressive evidence thereof. In behavioral psychology, agents are goal-directed entities that are able to monitor their environment to select and perform efficient means-ends actions that are available in a given situation to achieve an intended goal. Behavioral agency, therefore, implies the ability to perceive and to change the environment of the agent. Crucially, it also entails intentionality to represent the goal-state in the future, equifinal variability to be able to achieve the intended goal-state with different actions in different contexts, and rationality of actions in relation to their goal to produce the most efficient action available. Cognitive scientists and Behavioral psychologists have thoroughly investigated agency attribution in humans and non-human animals, since social cognitive mechanisms such as communication, social learning, imitation, or theory of mind presuppose the ability to identify agents and differentiate them from inanimate, non-agentive objects. This ability has also been assumed to have a major effect on inferential and predictive processes of the observers of agents, because agentive entities are expected to perform autonomous behavior based on their current and previous knowledge and intentions. On the other hand, inanimate objects are supposed to react to external physical forces.

Beatrix Tugendhut Gardner was an Austrian zoologist who became well known for the research that she conducted in the United States. She is most well known for her sign language studies with Washoe the chimpanzee, who was the first ape to learn sign language.

References

  1. "Minimum Course Content for Common Hand Signals for Scuba Diving" (PDF). Recreational Scuba Training Council, Inc. (RSTC) (Jacksonville, FL., USA). 1 December 2005. Retrieved 3 July 2016.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Kita S (Jun 20, 2003). Pointing: Where Language, Culture, and Cognition Meet. Psychology Press. ISBN   9780805840148 . Retrieved 16 January 2018.
  3. Colletta, Jean-Marc; Guidetti, Michèle (Jun 13, 2012). Gesture and Multimodal Development. John Benjamins Publishing. ISBN   9789027202581 . Retrieved 16 January 2018.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Leavens DA, Hopkins WD (December 1999). "The whole-hand point: the structure and function of pointing from a comparative perspective". Journal of Comparative Psychology. 113 (4): 417–25. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.113.4.417. PMC   2080771 . PMID   10608565.
  5. Bates, Elizabeth; Camaioni, Luigia; Volterra, Virginia (1975). "The acquisition of performatives prior to speech". Merrill-Palmer Quarterly. 21: 205–226 via JSTOR.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Kovács, Ágnes M.; Tauzin, Tibor; Téglás, Ernő; Gergely, György; Csibra, Gergely (November 1, 2014). "Pointing as Epistemic Request: 12-month-olds Point to Receive New Information". Infancy. 19 (6): 543–57. doi:10.1111/infa.12060. PMC   4641318 . PMID   26568703.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 Harris M, Butterworth G (Dec 6, 2012). Developmental Psychology: A Student's Handbook. Psychology Press. ISBN   9781841691923 . Retrieved 16 January 2018.
  8. 1 2 Cochet, Hélène; Vauclair, Jacques (2010). "Pointing gesture in young children: Hand preference and language development" (PDF). Gesture. 10 (2–3): 129–149. doi:10.1075/gest.10.2-3.02coc. S2CID   53062902 . Retrieved 18 January 2018.
  9. Weissenborn, Jürgen; Klein, Wolfgang (Jan 1, 1982). Here and There: Cross-linguistic Studies on Deixis and Demonstration. John Benjamins Publishing Company. ISBN   9789027225191 . Retrieved 18 January 2018.
  10. 1 2 3 Lenz, Friedrich (Apr 17, 2003). Deictic Conceptualisation of Space, Time and Person. John Benjamins Publishing Company. ISBN   9789027253545 . Retrieved 18 January 2018.
  11. 1 2 3 4 Tomasello, Michael (Jun 30, 2009). Constructing a Language. Harvard University Press. ISBN   9780674017641 . Retrieved 24 January 2018.
  12. "Pointing is infants' first communicative gesture". Science Daily . 24 February 2014. Retrieved 16 January 2018.
  13. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Colonnesi C, Geert JJ, Koster I, Noomb MJ (December 2010). "The relation between pointing and language development: A meta-analysis" (PDF). Developmental Review . 30 (4): 352–366. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2010.10.001.[ dead link ]
  14. 1 2 Bejarano, Teresa (2011). Becoming Human: From Pointing Gestures to Syntax. John Benjamins Publishing. ISBN   9789027252173 . Retrieved 16 January 2018.
  15. 1 2 Butterworth G (Jan 2, 2014). Principles of Developmental Psychology: An Introduction. Psychology Press. ISBN   9780863772801 . Retrieved 16 January 2018.
  16. Center, Yola (Oct 21, 2005). Beginning Reading: A Balanced Approach to Teaching Reading During the First Three Years at School. A&C Black. ISBN   9780826488756 . Retrieved 24 January 2018.
  17. Slobin, Dan Isaac (5 July 2017) [1st pub. 1985 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates]. The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition: Volume 1: the Data. Taylor & Francis. p. 980. ISBN   978-1-317-76885-2. OCLC   994006126 . Retrieved 17 January 2018.
  18. Marschark, Marc (1997). Psychological Development of Deaf Children. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 84–85. ISBN   978-0-19-511575-8. OCLC   948981235 . Retrieved 17 January 2018.
  19. Quinto-Pozos, David (29 January 2014). Multilingual Aspects of Signed Language Communication and Disorder. Communication disorders across languages. Bristol, U.K.: Multilingual Matters. p. 101. ISBN   978-1-78309-130-0. OCLC   862092449 . Retrieved 17 January 2018.
  20. Torigoe, Takashi (31 August 2006). "19. Japanese Sign Language". In Nakayama, Mineharu; Mazuka, Reiko; Shirai, Yasuhiro (eds.). The Handbook of East Asian Psycholinguistics: Volume 2, Japanese. Vol. 2. Cambridge University Press. pp. 142–143. ISBN   978-1-139-45597-8 . Retrieved 17 January 2018.
  21. Volkmar FR, Paul R, Rogers SJ, Pelphrey KA (2014). Handbook of Autism and Pervasive Developmental Disorders, Assessment, Interventions, and Policy. John Wiley & Sons. p. 301. ISBN   978-1-118-28220-5 . Retrieved 24 January 2018.
  22. David Wilkins, "Why Pointing With the Index Finger is Not a Universal (in Sociocultural and Semiotic Terms)", Chapter 8 in: Kita S (Jun 20, 2003). Pointing: Where Language, Culture, and Cognition Meet. Psychology Press. ISBN   9780805840148 . Retrieved 16 January 2018.
  23. Cooperrider, Kensy; Núñez, Rafael; Slotta, James (January 2014). "The protean pointing gesture: Variation in a building block of human communication". Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society: 355–360. doi:10.15781/T2NV99S9C . Retrieved 22 January 2018.
  24. Oxford English Dictionary , 3rd edition, March 2017, s.v. finger-point
  25. 1 2 3 4 Senft, Gunter (Jan 21, 2014). Understanding Pragmatics. Routledge. ISBN   9780415840569 . Retrieved 23 January 2018.
  26. Culpeper, Jonathan; Haugh, Michael; Kádár, Dániel Z. (May 11, 2017). The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness. Springer Publishing. ISBN   9781137375070 . Retrieved 22 January 2018.
  27. Fontes, Lisa Aronson (Aug 22, 2012). Interviewing Clients across Cultures: A Practitioner's Guide. Guilford Press. p. 84. ISBN   978-1606237298 . Retrieved 22 January 2018.
  28. Samovar, Larry A.; Porter, Richard E.; McDaniel, Edwin R.; Roy, Carolyn Sexton (Jan 1, 2016). Communication Between Cultures. Cengage Learning. ISBN   9781285444628 . Retrieved 23 January 2018.
  29. Janach, Sabine (Sep 2, 2001). Cultural Differences: A Barrier to Overcome the Singaporean Culture and its Characteristics. diplom.de. ISBN   9783838644578 . Retrieved 23 January 2018.
  30. Clements, Rhonda L.; Rady, Amy Meltzer (2012). Urban Physical Education: Instructional Practices and Cultural Activities. Human Kinetics. ISBN   9780736098397 . Retrieved 23 January 2018.
  31. 1 2 3 Miklósi Á, Soproni K (April 2006). "A comparative analysis of animals' understanding of the human pointing gesture". Animal Cognition. 9 (2): 81–93. doi:10.1007/s10071-005-0008-1. PMID   16235075. S2CID   6394972. ProQuest   807620916.
  32. Veà, Joaquim; Sabater-Pi, Jordi (1998). "Spontaneous Pointing Behaviour in the Wild Pygmy Chimpanzee (Pan paniscus)". Folia Primatologica. 69 (5): 289–290. doi:10.1159/000021640. ISSN   0015-5713. PMID   9751833. S2CID   3824325.
  33. 1 2 Cooperrider, Kensy (2020-04-03), Fifteen ways of looking at a pointing gesture, doi:10.31234/osf.io/2vxft, S2CID   241511017
  34. Douglas, Pamela Heidi; Moscovice, Liza R. (November 2015). "Pointing and pantomime in wild apes? Female bonobos use referential and iconic gestures to request genito-genital rubbing". Scientific Reports. 5 (1): 13999. doi:10.1038/srep13999. ISSN   2045-2322. PMC   4642555 . PMID   26358661.
  35. 1 2 Hobaiter, Catherine; Leavens, David A.; Byrne, Richard W. (2014). "Deictic gesturing in wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)? Some possible cases". Journal of Comparative Psychology. 128 (1): 82–87. doi:10.1037/a0033757. ISSN   1939-2087. PMID   24040760.
  36. Genty, Emilie; Zuberbühler, Klaus (July 2014). "Spatial Reference in a Bonobo Gesture". Current Biology. 24 (14): 1601–1605. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.05.065 . PMID   24998531. S2CID   8209324.
  37. Pika, Simone; Mitani, John (March 2006). "Referential gestural communication in wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)". Current Biology. 16 (6): R191–R192. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.02.037 . PMID   16546066. S2CID   2273018.
  38. Tauzin, Tibor; Bohn, Manuel; Gergely, György; Call, Josep (2020-01-23). "Context-sensitive adjustment of pointing in great apes". Scientific Reports. 10 (1): 1048. Bibcode:2020NatSR..10.1048T. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-56183-7. ISSN   2045-2322. PMC   6978377 . PMID   31974479.
  39. Halina, Marta; Liebal, Katja; Tomasello, Michael (2018-04-25). Bard, Kim A. (ed.). "The goal of ape pointing". PLOS ONE. 13 (4): e0195182. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195182 . ISSN   1932-6203. PMC   5918613 . PMID   29694358.
  40. Liebal, Katja; Müller, Cornelia; Pika, Simone (2007). Gestural Communication in Nonhuman and Human Primates. John Benjamins Publishing. ISBN   9789027222404 . Retrieved 24 January 2018.
  41. 1 2 Leavens, David (2012). Joint attention: Twelve myths. pp. 43–72. ISBN   9780262016827.
  42. Gonseth, Chloe; Kawakami, Fumito; Ichino, Etsuko; Tomonaga, Masaki (November 2017). "The higher the farther: distance-specific referential gestures in chimpanzees ( Pan troglodytes )". Biology Letters. 13 (11): 20170398. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2017.0398. ISSN   1744-9561. PMC   5719372 . PMID   29142043.
  43. Roberts, Anna Ilona; Vick, Sarah-Jane; Roberts, Sam George Bradley; Menzel, Charles R. (May 2014). "Chimpanzees modify intentional gestures to coordinate a search for hidden food". Nature Communications. 5 (1): 3088. doi:10.1038/ncomms4088. ISSN   2041-1723. PMC   4350813 . PMID   24430433.
  44. Clark, Hannah; Elsherif, Mahmoud M.; Leavens, David A. (October 2019). "Ontogeny vs. phylogeny in primate/canid comparisons: A meta-analysis of the object choice task". Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 105: 178–189. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.001. PMID   31170434. S2CID   173992048.
  45. Udell, Monique A.R.; Dorey, Nicole R.; Wynne, Clive D.L. (December 2008). "Wolves outperform dogs in following human social cues". Animal Behaviour. 76 (6): 1767–1773. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.07.028. S2CID   11226439.
  46. Udell, Monique A. R.; Giglio, Robson F.; Wynne, Clive D. L. (2008). "Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) use human gestures but not nonhuman tokens to find hidden food". Journal of Comparative Psychology. 122 (1): 84–93. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.122.1.84. ISSN   1939-2087. PMID   18298285.
  47. Kirchhofer, Katharina C.; Zimmermann, Felizitas; Kaminski, Juliane; Tomasello, Michael (2012-02-08). "Dogs (Canis familiaris), but Not Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), Understand Imperative Pointing". PLOS ONE. 7 (2): e30913. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030913 . ISSN   1932-6203. PMC   3275610 . PMID   22347411.
  48. Miklósi, Áam; Pongrácz, Péter; Lakatos, Gabriella; Topál, József; Csányi, Vilmos (2005). "A Comparative Study of the Use of Visual Communicative Signals in Interactions Between Dogs (Canis familiaris) and Humans and Cats (Felis catus) and Humans". Journal of Comparative Psychology. 119 (2): 179–186. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.119.2.179. ISSN   1939-2087. PMID   15982161.
  49. Smet, Anna F.; Byrne, Richard W. (2013). "African Elephants Can Use Human Pointing Cues to Find Hidden Food". Current Biology. 23 (20): 2033–2037. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.08.037 . hdl: 10023/5074 . ISSN   0960-9822. PMID   24120635.
  50. Hernádi, Anna; Kis, Anna; Turcsán, Borbála; Topál, József (2012). "Man's Underground Best Friend: Domestic Ferrets, Unlike the Wild Forms, Show Evidence of Dog-Like Social-Cognitive Skills". PLOS ONE. 7 (8): e43267. Bibcode:2012PLoSO...743267H. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043267 . ISSN   1932-6203. PMC   3419687 . PMID   22905244.
  51. Proops, Leanne; Walton, Meggen; McComb, Karen (2010). "The use of human-given cues by domestic horses, Equus caballus, during an object choice task". Animal Behaviour. 79 (6): 1205–1209. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.02.015. ISSN   0003-3472. S2CID   52235607.
  52. Scheumann, Marina; Call, Josep (2004-04-01). "The use of experimenter-given cues by South African fur seals (Arctocephalus pusillus)". Animal Cognition. 7 (4): 224–230. doi:10.1007/s10071-004-0216-0. ISSN   1435-9448. PMID   15057598. S2CID   24106660.
  53. Soproni, Krisztina; Miklósi, Ádám; Topál, József; Csányi, Vilmos (2002). "Dogs' ( Canis familaris ) responsiveness to human pointing gestures". Journal of Comparative Psychology. 116 (1): 27–34. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.116.1.27. ISSN   1939-2087. PMID   11926681.
  54. Lakatos, Gabriella; Soproni, Krisztina; Dóka, Antal; Miklósi, Ádám (2009-04-03). "A comparative approach to dogs' (Canis familiaris) and human infants' comprehension of various forms of pointing gestures". Animal Cognition. 12 (4): 621–631. doi:10.1007/s10071-009-0221-4. ISSN   1435-9448. PMID   19343382. S2CID   18078591.
  55. Tauzin, Tibor; Csík, Andor; Kis, Anna; Topál, József (2015). "What or where? The meaning of referential human pointing for dogs (Canis familiaris)" (PDF). Journal of Comparative Psychology. 129 (4): 334–338. doi:10.1037/a0039462. ISSN   1939-2087. PMID   26147704.
  56. Hopkins, William D.; Russell, Jamie; McIntyre, Joe; Leavens, David A. (2013-11-20). Addessi, Elsa (ed.). "Are Chimpanzees Really So Poor at Understanding Imperative Pointing? Some New Data and an Alternative View of Canine and Ape Social Cognition". PLOS ONE. 8 (11): e79338. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079338 . ISSN   1932-6203. PMC   3835830 . PMID   24278128.