Proto-Uto-Aztecan language

Last updated
Proto-Uto-Aztecan
PUA
Reconstruction of Uto-Aztecan languages
Region Aridoamerica
Era3,000 BCE
Lower-order reconstructions

Proto-Uto-Aztecan is the hypothetical common ancestor of the Uto-Aztecan languages. Authorities on the history of the language group have usually placed the Proto-Uto-Aztecan homeland in the border region between the United States and Mexico, namely the upland regions of Arizona and New Mexico and the adjacent areas of the Mexican states of Sonora and Chihuahua, roughly corresponding to the Sonoran Desert and the western part of the Chihuahuan Desert. It would have been spoken by Mesolithic foragers in Aridoamerica, about 5,000 years ago.

Contents

Homeland

Reconstructions of the botanical vocabulary offer clues to the ecological niche inhabited by the Proto-Uto-Aztecans. Fowler placed the center of Proto-Uto-Aztecan in Central Arizona with northern dialects extending into Nevada and the Mojave desert and southern dialects extending south through the Tepiman corridor into Mexico. [1] The homeland of the Numic languages has been placed in Southern California near Death Valley, and the homeland of the proposed Southern Uto-Aztecan group has been placed on the coast of Sonora. [2]

A contrary proposal suggests the homeland of Proto-Uto-Aztecan to have been much farther to the south; it was published in 2001 by Jane H. Hill, based on her reconstruction of maize-related vocabulary in Proto-Uto-Aztecan. By her theory, the assumed speakers of Proto-Uto-Aztecan were maize cultivators in Mesoamerica, who gradually moved north, bringing maize cultivation with them, during the period of roughly 4,500 to 3,000 years ago. The geographic diffusion of speakers corresponded to the breakup of linguistic unity. [3] [4] The hypothesis has been criticized on several grounds, and it is not generally accepted by Uto-Aztecanists. [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] Using computational phylogenetic methods, Wheeler & Whiteley (2014) [10] also suggest a southern homeland for Proto-Uto-Aztecan in or near the area occupied by historical Cora and some Nahua. Nahuatl forms the most basal clade in Wheeler & Whiteley's (2014) Uto-Aztecan phylogram. A survey of agriculture-related vocabulary by Merrill (2012) found that the agricultural vocabulary can be reconstructed for only Southern Uto-Aztecan. That supports a conclusion that the Proto-Uto-Aztecan speech community did not practice agriculture but adopted it only after entering Mesoamerica from the north. [11]

A more recent proposal from 2014, by David L. Shaul, presents evidence suggesting contact between Proto-Uto-Aztecan and languages of central California, such as Esselen and the Yokutsan languages. That leads Shaul to suggest that Proto-Uto-Aztecan was spoken in California's Central Valley area, and it formed part of an ancient Californian linguistic area. [12]

Phonology

Vowels

Proto-Uto-Aztecan is reconstructed as having an unusual vowel inventory: *i*a*u*o. Langacker (1970) demonstrated that the fifth vowel should be reconstructed as as opposed to *e, and there has been a long-running dispute over the proper reconstruction. [13] [14] [15]

Consonants

Bilabial Coronal Palatal Velar Labialized
velar
Glottal
Stop *p*t*k*kʷ
Affricate *ts
Fricative *s*h
Nasal *m*n
Rhotic *r
Semivowel *j*w

*n and may have actually been *l and *n.

Lexicon

The following are selected Proto-Uto-Aztecan reconstructions from Stubbs (2011). [16]

Abbreviations
glossProto-Uto-Aztecan
arrow*huc(a) > *huC
breast*piCti(C)
buzzard, turkey vulture *wiLhukuN
claw, nail*siCtuN / *suCtuN
cook, boil, bake, roast*kwasïC / *kwasaC
cricket*tukaw-capaLa
ear*nakka / *naNkapa (< *na(N)kasapa ?)
eye*pusi
give*makaC
hand, arm*man > *ma
head*mo’o; *ku / *ku’o
heart*suna > SUA *suLa
heavypïttï / *pïttiya / *pïttV’a
heel*tanapiCko / *tamukpi’-(ko)
horn, antler*awaC / *a’awaC
house, home*kanni (NUA) / *kaLi (SUA); *ki
husband*kuNa / *kumCa / *kuCma
liver*nïmaC / *nïmaN
lungs*somCo / *soNCa > *soŋo
moon*mïcaC (< *mancaL ?)
mother*yï’ï / *yïC / *yïk; *ya...
mouth*tï’na > *tï’ni; *tï’nV-pa > *tï’n-pa > *tïmpa
navel*sikuN / *sikʷuL
neck*kuta / *kuLa
no, not*ka / *kay
nose*yakaC / *ya’ka; *mupiC / *mukpiC
rabbit, cottontail *tapuC / *taput
rainbow*ko(C)-samaLo
road*poC / *po’ï / *powï
rock, stone*tïmï-ta > *tïN-(pV)
rot, pus, infection*piska / *pisVka
salt*omCa / *oNCa > oŋa
skunk*huppa; *po(C)ni
skyNUA *tukuN(-pa) > SUA *tVkpa
sleep*ïppïwi / *ïCpïCi / *pïwi; *koci
snow*kïpa; *nïpa
summer*taCcaC < *tattaC / *taCcaC
sun, day*ta-
tail*kwasi
tongue*Laŋu; *akoN
tooth*tamaC / *tamaN / *taman
urinate*si’i / *si’a
water*pa / *pa’wi
what*han-ta / *hiCta / *hin-ta
when*ha-na-’oko
who*haka / *haki
wind, blow*hïka / *hïkawa / *hïkwa
winter*tommo / *toCmo
wolf*cï’ï
one*sïma’ / *sïmï’; *sïnu
two*wakay / *wokay
three*pakay

Related Research Articles

In historical linguistics, the homeland or Urheimat of a proto-language is the region in which it was spoken before splitting into different daughter languages. A proto-language is the reconstructed or historically-attested parent language of a group of languages that are genetically related.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hokan languages</span>

The Hokan language family is a hypothetical grouping of a dozen small language families spoken mainly in California, Arizona, and Baja California.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Uto-Aztecan languages</span> North American language family

Uto-Aztecan languages are a family of indigenous languages of the Americas, consisting of over thirty languages. Uto-Aztecan languages are found almost entirely in the Western United States and Mexico. The name of the language family reflects the common ancestry of the Ute language of Utah and the Nahuan languages of Mexico.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Merritt Ruhlen</span> American linguist (1944–2021)

Merritt Ruhlen was an American linguist who worked on the classification of languages and what this reveals about the origin and evolution of modern humans. Amongst other linguists, Ruhlen's work was recognized as standing outside the mainstream of comparative-historical linguistics. He was the principal advocate and defender of Joseph Greenberg's approach to language classification.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Yokuts language</span> Endangered language of California, US

Yokuts, formerly known as Mariposa, is an endangered language family spoken in the interior of Northern and Central California in and around the San Joaquin Valley by the Yokuts people. The speakers of Yokuts languages were severely affected by disease, missionaries, and the Gold Rush. While descendants of Yokuts speakers currently number in the thousands, all languages apart from Valley Yokuts are now extinct.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Numic languages</span> Uto-Aztecan language branch of US

Numic is the northernmost branch of the Uto-Aztecan language family. It includes seven languages spoken by Native American peoples traditionally living in the Great Basin, Colorado River basin, Snake River basin, and southern Great Plains. The word Numic comes from the cognate word in all Numic languages for “person”, which reconstructs to Proto-Numic as. For example, in the three Central Numic languages and the two Western Numic languages it is. In Kawaiisu it is and in Colorado River, and.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Plateau Penutian languages</span> Subgroup within the hypothetical Penutian language family

Plateau Penutian is a family of languages spoken in northern California, reaching through central-western Oregon to northern Washington and central-northern Idaho.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nahuan languages</span> Uto-Aztecan language family in North America

The Nahuan or Aztecan languages are those languages of the Uto-Aztecan language family that have undergone a sound change, known as Whorf's law, that changed an original *t to before *a. Subsequently, some Nahuan languages have changed this to or back to, but it can still be seen that the language went through a stage. The best known Nahuan language is Nahuatl. Nahuatl is spoken by about 1.7 million Nahua peoples.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mono language (California)</span> Native American language of California

Mono is a Native American language of the Numic group of Uto-Aztecan languages, the ancestral language of the Mono people. Mono consists of two dialects, Eastern and Western. The name "Monachi" is commonly used in reference to Western Mono and "Owens Valley Paiute" in reference to Eastern Mono. In 1925, Alfred Kroeber estimated that Mono had 3,000 to 4,000 speakers. As of 1994, only 37 elderly people spoke Mono as their first language. It is classified as critically endangered by UNESCO. It is spoken in the southern Sierra Nevada, the Mono Basin, and the Owens Valley of central-eastern California. Mono is most closely related to Northern Paiute; these two are classified as the Western group of the Numic branch of the Uto-Aztecan language family.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Northern Paiute language</span> Numic language spoken in western US

Northern Paiute, endonym Numu, also known as Paviotso, is a Western Numic language of the Uto-Aztecan family, which according to Marianne Mithun had around 500 fluent speakers in 1994. It is closely related to the Mono language.

Terrence Kaufman was an American linguist specializing in documentation of unwritten languages, lexicography, Mesoamerican historical linguistics and language contact phenomena. He was an emeritus professor of linguistics and anthropology at the University of Pittsburgh.

Pochutec is an extinct Uto-Aztecan language of the Nahuan branch which was spoken in and around the town of Pochutla on the Pacific coast of Oaxaca, Mexico. In 1917, it was documented in a monograph by Franz Boas, who considered the language nearly extinct. In the 1970s, another investigator found two speakers around Pochutla who still remembered a few of the words recorded by Boas.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Opata language</span> Extinct Uto-Aztecan languages of Mexico

Ópata is either of two closely related Uto-Aztecan languages, Teguima and Eudeve, spoken by the Opata people of northern central Sonora in Mexico and Southeast of Arizona in the United States. It was believed to be dead already in 1930, and Carl Sofus Lumholtz reported the Opata to have become "Mexicanized" and lost their language and customs already when traveling through Sonora in the 1890s.

Proto-Nahuan is a hypothetical daughter language of the Proto-Uto-Aztecan language. It is the common ancestor from which the modern Nahuan languages have developed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aztec–Tanoan languages</span> North American aboriginal language family

Aztec–Tanoan is a hypothetical and undemonstrated language family that proposes a genealogical relation between the Tanoan and the Uto-Aztecan families. This proposed classification has not been definitively demonstrated, largely because of slow progress in the reconstruction of the intermediate stages of the two language families involved, but is still considered promising by many linguists. The grouping was originally proposed by Edward Sapir in his 1921 classification, but it was not until 1937 that supporting evidence was published by Benjamin Lee Whorf and G. L. Trager. Their proposal included some 67 proposed cognates, but subsequent reviews have found most of them to be unconvincing. A small number of their proposed cognates do seem to have some merit and in his 1997 review of the hypothesis Lyle Campbell states that the proposal is not implausible but requires detailed study. A recent article by Jane H. Hill argues that the evidence cited for the genetic relation by Whorf and Trager is better understood as a result of language contact between the Uto-Aztecan and Tanoan proto-languages.

The Pueblo linguistic area is a Sprachbund consisting of the languages spoken in and near North American Pueblo locations. There are also many shared cultural practices in this area. For example, these cultures share many ceremonial vocabulary terms meant for prayer or song.

Macro-Mayan is a proposal linking the clearly established Mayan family with neighboring families that show similarities to Mayan. The term was apparently coined by McQuown (1942), but suggestions for historical relationships relevant to this hypothesis can be traced back to the Squier (1861), who offered comparisons between Mayan and Mixe-Zoquean languages, and Radin, who did the same for Mixe-Zoquean, Huave, and Mayan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nahuatl</span> Uto-Aztecan language of Mexico

Nahuatl, Aztec, or Mexicano is a language or, by some definitions, a group of languages of the Uto-Aztecan language family. Varieties of Nahuatl are spoken by about 1.7 million Nahuas, most of whom live mainly in Central Mexico and have smaller populations in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Linguistic areas of the Americas</span>

The indigenous languages of the Americas form various linguistic areas or Sprachbunds that share various common (areal) traits. The following list of linguistic areas is primarily based on Campbell.

Whorf's law is a sound law in Uto-Aztecan linguistics proposed by the linguist Benjamin Lee Whorf. It explains the origin in the Nahuan languages of the phoneme which is not found in any of the other languages of the Uto-Aztecan family. The existence of in Nahuatl had puzzled previous linguists and caused Edward Sapir to reconstruct a phoneme for Proto-Uto-Aztecan based only on evidence from Aztecan. In a 1937 paper published in the journal American Anthropologist, Whorf argued that phoneme was a result of some of the Nahuan or Aztecan languages having undergone a sound change changing the original */t/ to in the position before */a/. The sound law was labeled "Whorf's law" by Manaster Ramer and is still widely though not universally considered valid, although a more detailed understanding of the precise conditions under which it took place has been developed.

References

  1. Fowler 1983.
  2. Campbell 1997, p. 137.
  3. Hill 2001, .
  4. Hill 2010, .
  5. Kemp et al. 2010, .
  6. Merrill et al. 2010, .
  7. Brown 2010, .
  8. Campbell 2003.
  9. Campbell & Poser 2008, p. 346-350.
  10. Wheeler, W. C.; Whiteley, P. M. (2014). "Historical linguistics as a sequence optimization problem: the evolution and biogeography of Uto-Aztecan languages" (PDF). Cladistics. 31 (2): 113–125. doi:10.1111/cla.12078. PMID   34758582. S2CID   86030904.
  11. Merrill 2012.
  12. Shaul 2014.
  13. Langacker 1970, .
  14. Dakin 1996, .
  15. Campbell 1997, p. 136.
  16. Stubbs, Brian D. 2011. Uto-Aztecan: A comparative vocabulary. Flower Mound, Texas: Shumway Family History Services.

Sources