Qianshanosuchus

Qianshanosuchus; Temporal range: Paleocene PreꞒ Ꞓ O S D C P T J K Pg N
Scientific classification
Domain:	Eukaryota
Kingdom:	Animalia
Phylum:	Chordata
Class:	Reptilia
Clade:	Archosauromorpha
Clade:	Archosauriformes
Order:	Crocodilia
Genus:	† Qianshanosuchus ; Boerman et al., 2022
Species:	†Q. youngi
Binomial name
	†Qianshanosuchus youngi; Boerman et al., 2022

Last updated August 15, 2024

Qianshanosuchus is a genus of basal crocodyloid from the Paleocene of the Qianshan Basin, China. The fossil material, which includes an incomplete skull and parts of the lower jaw, show various features usually associated with juvenile crocodiles alongside various unique traits that were used to erect a new genus. It is the first and only basal crocodyloid currently known from the Paleocene of China, which had previously only yielded alligatoroids and planocraniids. Its presence in this part of the world and its basal position to species of the genus Asiatosuchus supports the idea that crocodyloids dispersed from Asia into Europe. Qianshanosuchus only includes a single species, Qianshanosuchus youngi.^[1]

History and naming

Qianshanosuchus is known from only a single specimen, IBCAS QS15, an incomplete skull and an associated part of the mandible. Based on the small size of the holotype and several anatomical traits, it is thought to preserve a juvenile specimen. The material was collected near Xialou village in the Qianshan Basin of China by a joint expedition of Belgian and Chinese researchers. Preparation was handled by the Museum of Natural Sciences of Belgium and the fossils were curated by the Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences.^[1]

The genus name derives from the Qianshan Basin and the Greek suchus for "crocodile". The species is named after Yang Zhongjian, also known as Chung-Chien Young.^[1]

Description

The skull of Qianshanosuchus is small, measuring only 9.7 cm (3.8 in) from the tip of the snout to the back of the skull, one of several traits that indicate that the material belonged to a juvenile. The maxillary foramen, a hole in the skull for the fifth cranial nerve, is notably enlarged. The suture where the squamosal and parietal bones meet is situated on a ridge and an acute notch stretches over the parietal and supraoccipital, the later of which is largely exposed on the skull table. The dorsal edge of the orbits is raised and on the mandible the surangular features a prominent ridge on the lateral side of the bone.^[1]

Of five premaxillary teeth, only the last is preserved and shows a smooth surface with no visible ridges. While only this tooth is present in the premaxillae, based on the size of the alveoli the third and fourth were the largest in this part of the jaw. The maxillae preserve only six alveoli, but based on the size of them and the bad preservation of the rest of the bone, it is likely that in life the animal would have had between eight and sixteen maxillary teeth. The preserved teeth are thought to represent the first, second, third, fifth and possibly the ninth tooth of the maxilla. All of them are angled labially (outwards) and show slight lateral compression, which is typically seen in juvenile crocodilians but also found in adult planocranids.^[1]

Several other features of the skull are also indicative of the fact that the material that forms Qianshanosuchus belonged to a juvenile. This includes the relative size of the orbits compared to the full skull and similarly the size of the skull table compared to the total skull width. Overall, the orbits take up three quarters of the skulls width and one quarter of its length. The supratemporal fenestrae are shallow and widely spaced as seen in the juveniles of modern species, the skull lacks the pronounced ornamentation that is typical for adult crocodiles and various other characters related to the teeth, frontal bone and other elements likewise suggest that the specimen was not yet mature at the time of its death. In spite of these variable features however, those deemed diagnostic for Qianshanosuchus were determined to be unaffected by ontogeny in modern crocodilians. The only exception regards the upturned margins of the orbits, which remain unchanged in some species but disappear with age in others.^[1]

Phylogeny

To determine the relationship between Qianshanosuchus and other crocodylians, two different datasets had been used by Boerman and colleagues. The matrix of Shan et al. (2021) was chosen as the first dataset due to its extensive coverage of Asian crocodylians. The second matrix on the other hand, Rio and Mannion (2021), offers a series of additional advantages and disadvantages compared to Shan's dataset. Rio and Mannion included several additional characters with more reductive coding and more objective wording. However, unlike the former, this dataset did not include a large amount of basal crocodyloids or most orientalosuchines. The two matrices subsequently differ notably in how they recover the internal relationships of Crocodylia. Shan et al. recovers Tomistominae as an independent group more closely related to Crocodylidae than to the basal Gavialoidea, while the other dataset shows tomistomines and gavialines as forming a clade more derived than Alligatoridae.^[1]

As the material of Qianshanosuchus is thought to have belonged to a juvenile, both matrices were used multiple times under changed circumstances to account for any features that would change with age. Initial analysis took the datasets as they were while additional tests either removed any juvenile characters from Qianshanosuchus or included data for juvenile specimens of the American alligator and Nile crocodile. Using the matrix of Shan et al. consistently recovered Qianshanosuchus as a basal member of Crocodyloidea, less derived than the various species of Asiatosuchus . This outcome remained unchanged regardless of the inclusion of juvenile characters. Likewise, the results formed by the Rio and Mannion matrix showed little impact of the juvenile characters on the general placement of Qianshanosuchus. Unlike in the former tests, here the taxon was placed outside of Crocodyloidea and even Longirostres (a clade formed by crocodyloids and gavialoids). This dataset found it to consistently align itself with Asiatosuchus, although the exact relations of the formed clade varied slightly across the analysis.^[1]

Boerman and colleagues conclude that, although the precise topology of the different crocodilian clades differ between analysis and matrices, Qianshanosuchus consistently shows affinities with taxa typically considered to be basal crocodyloids. They argue that the different results stemming from the Rio and Mannion matrix may partially be caused by their relative recency and tentatively assign Qianshanosuchus to the Crocodyloidea. The two phylogenetic trees below show Qianshanosuchus' position as recovered with the matrix of Shan et al. (left) and Rio & Mannion (right) respectively without changes to the dataset to account for juvenile traits.^[1]

Biogeography

Qianshanosuchus represents the first basal crocodyloid known from the Paleocene of China, with the previously oldest member of this clade being Asiatosuchus grangeri from the middle Eocene, approximately 15 to 20 million years later. Phylogenetic analysis following the matrix of Shan et al. suggests that Qianshanosuchus would be immediately basal to Prodiplocynodon and Albertosuchus , two taxa from the late Cretaceous of North America. Following these results, this would require the Asian Qianshanosuchus to have diverged from its North American relatives at some point during the Maastrichtian, a hypothesis which could be corroborated by Jiangxisuchus from the Cretaceous of China. Previous analysis have placed it as a basal crocodyloid, however during the description of Qianshanosuchus it was recovered as an alligatoroid instead. Regardless, this dispersal may have occurred through the Bering land bridge, which would have been exposed during the Maastrichtian. Although alligatoroids were suggested to have also dispersed from North America to Europe prior to the Eocene, the lack of crocodyloids in Cretaceous Europe suggests that the ancestors of Qianshanosuchus likely did not arrive in China over this western route. Additionally, the recovered relationship to "Asiatosuchus" depressifrons and "Asiatosuchus" germanicus from France and Germany would lend support to the further dispersals of crocodyloids from Asia onwards to Europe, at least following the results using the Shan et al. matrix. It is also possible that crocodyloids dispersed into Europe more than once, as "Asiatosuchus" depressifrons was found to be more closely related to Asiatosuchus species from Asia and North America than to the other European species.^[1]

Related Research Articles

Kambara is an extinct genus of mekosuchine crocodylian that lived during the Eocene epoch in Australia. It is generally thought to have been a semi-aquatic generalist, living a lifestyle similar to many of today's crocodiles. Four species are currently recognised, the sympatric Kambara murgonensis and Kambara implexidens from sediments near Murgon, the poorly preserved Kambara molnari from the Rundle Formation and the youngest of the four, Kambara taraina, also from the Rundle Formation. Kambara were medium-sized crocodilians, with mature specimens generally reaching lengths from 3–4 m (9.8–13.1 ft).

Ceratosuchus is an extinct genus of alligatorine crocodylian from latest Paleocene rocks of Colorado's Piceance Basin and earliest Eocene rocks of Wyoming's Bighorn Basin in North America, a slice of time known as the Clarkforkian North American Land Mammal Age. Like its modern relatives, Ceratosuchus was a swamp-dwelling predator. It is named for the pair of flattened, triangular bony plates that extend from the back of its head.

Wannaganosuchus is an extinct genus of small alligatorid crocodilian. It was found in Late Paleocene-age rocks of Billings County, North Dakota, United States.

Leidyosuchus is an extinct genus of alligatoroid from the Late Cretaceous of Alberta. It was named in 1907 by Lawrence Lambe, and the type species is L. canadensis. It is known from a number of specimens from the middle Campanian age Dinosaur Park Formation. It was a medium-sized alligatoroid, with a maximum skull length greater than 40 centimeters (16 in).

Eoalligator is an extinct genus of alligatoroid crocodilian from Paleocene deposits in China.

Argochampsa is an extinct genus of eusuchian crocodylomorph, usually regarded as a gavialoid crocodilian, related to modern gharials. It lived in the Paleocene of Morocco. Described by Hua and Jouve in 2004, the type species is A. krebsi, with the species named for Bernard Krebs. Argochampsa had a long narrow snout, and appears to have been marine in habits.

Necrosuchus is an extinct genus of caiman from modern day Argentina that lived during the Paleocene epoch. It inhabited the fluvio-lacustrine environment of the Patagonian Salamanca Formation.

Navajosuchus is an extinct genus of alligatorine crocodylian. Its fossils have been found in the Paleocene-age Nacimiento Formation of the San Juan Basin, New Mexico. It was named in 1942 by Charles C. Mook, and the original type species was N. novomexicanus. N. novomexicanus was based on AMNH 5186, a partial skull collected in 1913. Later research showed that Navajosuchus novomexicanus was the same as the earlier-named Allognathosuchus mooki. However, A. mooki does not belong to the genus Allognathosuchus, and so the name of the crocodilian becomes Navajosuchus mooki. Under whichever name is used, this animal would have been a generalized predator of the Nacimiento floodplains. It was the most common Nacimiento Formation crocodilian, found in both the Puercan and Torrejonian faunal assemblages.

Asiatosuchus is an extinct genus of crocodyloid crocodilians that lived in Eurasia during the Paleogene. Many Paleogene crocodilians from Europe and Asia have been attributed to Asiatosuchus since the genus was named in 1940. These species have a generalized crocodilian morphology typified by flat, triangular skulls. The feature that traditionally united these species under the genus Asiatosuchus is a broad connection or symphysis between the two halves of the lower jaw. Recent studies of the evolutionary relationships of early crocodilians along with closer examinations of the morphology of fossil specimens suggest that only the first named species of Asiatosuchus, A. grangeri from the Eocene of Mongolia, belongs in the genus. Most species are now regarded as nomina dubia or "dubious names", meaning that their type specimens lack the unique anatomical features necessary to justify their classification as distinct species. Other species such as "A." germanicus and "A." depressifrons are still considered valid species, but they do not form an evolutionary grouping with A. grangeri that would warrant them being placed together in the genus Asiatosuchus.

Listrognathosuchus is an extinct genus of alligatoroid crocodilian. Fossils date back to the middle Paleocene epoch. In 1997, the generic name replaced that of Leidyosuchus for the species L. multidentatus. "L." multidentalis was first described by Charles Mook in 1930 on the basis of the holotype AMNH 5179, consisting of a partial vertebral column, mandible, partial left ilium, and left tibia, found from a locality in Torrejon Arroyo, New Mexico.

Prodiplocynodon is an extinct genus of basal crocodyloid crocodylian. It is one of the only crocodyloids known from the Cretaceous and existed during the Maastrichtian stage. The only species of Prodiplocynodon is the type species P. langi from the Lance Formation of Wyoming, known only from a single holotype skull lacking the lower jaw.

<i>Arenysuchus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Arenysuchus is an extinct monospecific genus of allodaposuchid eusuchian crocodylomorph from Late Cretaceous deposits of north Spain. It is known from the holotype MPZ ELI-1, a partial skull from Elías site, and from the referred material MPZ2010/948, MPZ2010/949, MPZ2010/950 and MPZ2010/951, four teeth from Blasi 2 site. It was found by the researchers José Manuel Gasca and Ainara Badiola from the Tremp Formation, in Arén of Huesca, Spain. It was first named by Eduardo Puértolas, José I. Canudo and Penélope Cruzado-Caballero in 2011 and the type species is Arenysuchus gascabadiolorum.

"Crocodylus" affinis is an extinct species of crocodyloid from the Eocene of Wyoming. Fossils were first described from the Bridger Formation by American paleontologist Othniel Charles Marsh in 1871. Marsh described the species, along with every other species of crocodyloid in the Bridger Formation, under the genus Crocodylus. The known specimen of "Crocodylus" affinis is a skull found at Grizzly Buttes, Wyoming, measuring 13 inches in length on the upper surface. Recent phylogenetic studies of crocodyloids show that "C." affinis is not a species of Crocodylus, but a genus has not yet been erected to include the species. Other Bridger species such as Crocodylus clavis and Brachyuranochampsa zangerli have been synonymized with "C." affinis.

"Crocodylus" megarhinus is an extinct species of crocodile from the Eocene of Egypt. A partial skull was found by British paleontologist Charles William Andrews in the Fayum Depression. Andrews named Crocodylus megarhinus in 1905 on the basis of the holotype skull. A complete skull was also uncovered from Egypt in 1907 but was not recognized as "C." megarhinus until 1927.

Astorgosuchus is an extinct monospecific genus of crocodilian, closely related to true crocodiles, that lived in Pakistan during the late Oligocene period. This crocodile may have reached lengths of up to 7–8 m (23–26 ft) and is known to have preyed on many of the large mammals found in its environment. Bite marks of a large crocodile have been found on the bones of juvenile Paraceratherium, however if these were left by Astorgosuchus cannot be said with certainty. The genus contains a single species, Astorgosuchus bugtiensis, which was originally named as a species of Crocodylus in 1908 and was moved to its own genus in 2019.

Protoalligator is an extinct genus of alligatoroid crocodilian found in the Anhui province of China and lived during the Paleocene.

Orientalosuchina is an extinct clade of alligatoroid crocodylians from South and East Asia that lived during the Paleocene and Eocene.

Jiangxisuchus is an extinct genus of crocodylian that lived during the Late Cretaceous in what is now China. It was described in 2019, and was proposed to be a basal member of Crocodyloidea. However, another concurrent 2019 study recovered Jiangxisuchus instead as a basal member of Alligatoroidea, within the newly named clade Orientalosuchina.

Ultrastenos is an extinct genus of Australian mekosuchine crocodilian that lived during the Late Oligocene in northwestern Queensland, Australia. Following its discovery, it was speculated that Ultrastenos was a slender-snouted animal similar to modern gharials or freshwater crocodiles due to the seemingly abruptly narrowing mandible. However, a later study found that this was a missinterpretation of the fossil specimen and that Ultrastenos instead had a more generalized lower jaw. The same publication also provided evidence that the fossils of Ultrastenos belonged to the same animal previously named "Baru" huberi, adding further evidence to the idea that the animal was short snouted, contrary to the initial hypothesis. Given that "Baru" huberi was named first, the type species of Ultrastenos changed from U. willisi to U. huberi in accordance with the rules of the ICZN. Ultrastenos was a small mekosuchine, measuring upwards of 1.5 m long.

Eurycephalosuchus is an extinct genus of orientalosuchine alligatoroid from the Late Cretaceous Jiangxi Province of China. Known from a well preserved skull and mandible alongside various postcranial remains, Eurycephalosuchus possessed a short and broad skull with a very short skulltable. Eurycephalosuchus lived with at least one other crocodilian, an indetermined member of the clade Brevirostres. The genus is monotypic, containing only the species Eurycephalosuchus gannanensis.

References

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Boerman SA, Perrichon G, Yang J, Li CS, Martin JE, Speijer RP, Smith T (2022). "A juvenile skull from the early Palaeocene of China extends the appearance of crocodyloids in Asia back by 15–20 million years". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. doi:10.1093/zoolinnean/zlac067.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

[B22-1] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Boerman SA, Perrichon G, Yang J, Li CS, Martin JE, Speijer RP, Smith T (2022). "A juvenile skull from the early Palaeocene of China extends the appearance of crocodyloids in Asia back by 15–20 million years". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. doi:10.1093/zoolinnean/zlac067.

[1]