Shaftesbury (UK Parliament constituency)

Last updated

Shaftesbury
Former borough constituency
for the House of Commons
1295–1885
SeatsTwo until 1832; one 1832–1885
Replaced by North Dorset

Shaftesbury was a parliamentary constituency in Dorset. It returned two Members of Parliament to the House of Commons of England, Great Britain and the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1295 until 1832 and one member until the constituency was abolished in 1885.

Contents

History

Boundaries and franchise before 1832

Shaftesbury was one of the towns summoned to send representatives to the Model Parliament of 1295, and thereafter was continuously represented (except during the temporary upheavals of the Commonwealth) until the 19th century. The constituency was a parliamentary borough, which until 1832 consisted of parts of three parishes in the town of Shaftesbury, a market town in Dorset. In the 17th century the Mayor and Corporation attempted to restrict the right to vote to themselves, but after a decision in 1697 the vote was exercised by all inhabitant householders paying scot and lot. Shaftesbury being a prosperous town this included the vast majority of households, and in 1831 when the borough contained only 474 houses, 400 separate properties were rated for scot and lot and 359 people voted in that year's election. The franchise was therefore in practice, for the period, a very liberal one.

Political character in the 18th century

Like many boroughs, Shaftesbury generally recognised the local landowner as its "patron", with the right to nominate both its MPs, but also expected this influence to be cemented with generous bribery, making electoral control of the substantial electorate an expensive business. In the mid 18th century the joint patrons were Lord Ilchester and The Earl of Shaftesbury, who generally agreed to nominate one member each rather than bringing about a contested election which would allow the voters scope to demand bribes. Ilchester, who as Stephen Fox had sat as the borough's MP for a number of years before being raised to the peerage, described it as "troublesome, expensive and corrupt".

The patrons were free to recoup their expenditure by selling the seats to suitable candidates (at that period perfectly legal) rather than giving them to family or friends, but avoiding an expensive contest meant they could pocket the proceeds rather than seeing them (illegally) passing into the pockets of the voters. Namier quotes from the papers of Prime Minister Newcastle to show that Sir Thomas Clavering paid £2000 for his seat at Shaftesbury in 1754, [1] and that in 1761 Newcastle quoted the same sum as the likely price of a seat for Sir Gilbert Heathcote, but added that no other pocket borough would be any cheaper.

However, the agreement between the patrons to split the seats amicably merely caused the townsmen to encourage independent candidates to stand so as to ensure a contest, and from 1761 onwards there was generally at least one candidate competing against those backed by the patrons. There also developed the practice of extending bribes in the form of "loans", which would not be called in provided the voter voted as instructed.

The corrupt election of 1774

Over the years a number of election results were overturned because of corrupt or illegal practices by the victors, but that of 1774 was particularly notorious. At that election one candidate, Hans Winthrop Mortimer, stood independently of the established interests in the town and, having been easily defeated, petitioned to have the result overturned and produced copious evidence of corruption. Thomas Rumbold and Francis Sykes were both shown to have bribed at a rate of 20 guineas (£21) a man, the total spent amounting to several thousand pounds; worse, the magistrates of the town were implicated in distributing this largesse. The contemporary historian of abuses in the rotten boroughs, Thomas Oldfield, gave this account of the "very singular and very absurd contrivances" unsuccessfully used in the hope of preventing proof of involvement:

A person concealed under a ludicrous and fantastical disguise, and called by the name of Punch, was placed in a small apartment, and through a hole in the door delivered to the voters parcels, containing twenty guineas each: upon which they were conducted to another apartment in the same house, where they found another person called Punch's secretary, who required them to sign notes for the value received: these notes were made payable to an imaginary character, to whom was given the name of Glenbucket. Two of the witnesses swore that they had seen Punch through the hole in the door, and that they knew him to be Mr. Matthews, an alderman of the town...

The Commons Committee accepted the evidence before them, and not only declared Sykes and Rumbold not duly elected and Mortimer duly elected to one of the seats in their place, but ordered that Sykes, Rumbold, and a long list of other inhabitants of the town should be prosecuted by the Attorney General for bribery and perjury. A bill was also brought in to permanently deprive the guilty parties of their votes; however this was never passed, the prosecution never took place, and the Commons was eventually persuaded to reverse its condemnations of Sykes and Rumbold so that both were able to stand for the borough at the next general election. They did not escape penalty entirely, however, as Mortimer brought a civil suit for bribery against Sykes at Dorchester Assizes, and was awarded £11,000 in damages – which he used to buy houses in the town, increasing his own influence at future elections.

Bankruptcy and evictions

The combination of corruption at the election itself and the need to fight petitions against the result afterwards made Shaftesbury too expensive to be useful to Ilchester, and he sold most of his property in the town to Sykes, while the Earl of Shaftesbury, having failed to get his candidate elected in 1776, seems to have withdrawn from any active involvement. Meanwhile, Mortimer continued his acquisition of property in the town until he owned the majority of houses in the borough, but spent so much on this and on fighting elections that he ran through his substantial fortune and ended in a debtors' prison.

The majority interest in the borough then passed to the nabob Paul Benfield, who bought up Mortimer's properties cheaply when they were auctioned off to benefit his creditors. However, after twice being elected in expensive contests, Benfield too was bankrupted. Shaftesbury then passed through a number of hands until, on the eve of the Reform Act, the principal interest was that of Earl Grosvenor. His accession seems to have eliminated Shaftesbury's endemic bribery and converted it to a more secure pocket borough: when Edward Harbord was offered the seat in 1820 in token of Grosvenor's admiration for his stand over Peterloo, he described it as "a place where no questions are asked as to political principles, and no money required". However, Grosvenor opted for coercion rather than persuasion to enforce his will, and at the tumultuous election of 1830 threatened to evict any of his tenants who did not back his candidates. This won the day, although the anti-Grosvenor candidate promised to compensate any of his supporters who might be evicted, and the election ended in a riot. Grosvenor's agents then proceeded to issue notice to quit to the recalcitrant tenants, fuelling an even-more-vigorous (but still unsuccessful) opposition to his candidates at the 1831 election, even though both of his nominees were pro-Reform.

Effects of the Reform Act

In 1831, the population of the borough was 2,742, but the Reform Act of the following year extended the boundaries to include the whole of three town parishes and ten other adjoining parishes, covering an area several miles across and bringing the population up to 8,518. This was a bigger population than the revised borough of Poole, across the county, which kept both its MPs. Nevertheless, the Act provided that Shaftesbury lost one of its two MPs. The electorate of the new constituency was 634, and the reformed franchise being more restrictive than that which had previously operated, it was only the provision that preserved the rights of existing voters for life that prevented the new electorate from being as small as the old one. Indeed, as these voters died off or moved away the electorate fell still further, and only 461 men were registered to vote by 1865.

The constituency was unaltered in the boundary changes of 1868, but was too small to survive the next reform, and was abolished with effect from the 1885 general election. Shaftesbury itself and most of the borough were placed in the new Dorset North county constituency, though the parish of Donhead St Mary was in Wiltshire and was therefore incorporated into the Wilton constituency.

Members of Parliament

1295–1629

Year of reignYearLocationMP1MP2
Edward 1  from1272
251296WestminsterJohn CockaineHugh Gappe
261297YorkRoger le TeynturerWm. Langecock
281299LondonWalter Snowden/SendenJohn Vigorous
301301LondonWm. SesewoodThos. Sharewood
331304LondonLaurence Pynge jun.John de Wilton
341305LondonWm. AunkehillJohn de Wilton
351306CarlilseWalter SandenHamond le Lange
Edward 2  from1307
11307YorkRobert de Monte AltoRichard Normayne
51311LondonWalter SandenHamond le Lange
61312WestminsterWalter SandenThos. Steerman/Shareham
71313WestminsterJohn HatcheJohn le Read
81314WestminsterWalter Sanden/de SoudonJohn Figerous/Vigorous
151321YorkJohn le Mal/HullJohn le Ston
161322WestminsterRichard Kinemere/KymerJohn Cockayne/Cockaine
191325WestminsterRoge Luff junWm. Vigorous/Virugore
Edward 3  from1327
11327YorkRichard PalmerJohn de Hull
11327WestminsterThos. Berewyk
21328NorthRichard le PalmereRichard de Kynemere
41330WinchesterRichard de KynemourWm. Vigorous
61332WestminsterJohn AnketillJohn Bray
71333WestminsterRobt. AnctillWalter Sondon
91335WestminsterPeter MankerneysWalter Sondon
91335YorkJohn AnketillJohn le Draper
101336NottinghamJohn AnketillWm. Sondon
111337WestminsterJohn Sutton
111337WestminsterWm. AnketillThos. Platell & John Seled
121338WestminsterThos. PlatellWm. Anketill
141340WestminsterJohn SteermanThos. Platell
151341WestminsterJohn de Wyke
151341WestminsterRobt. AxtrllJohn Steerman
171343WestminsterWm. le MewThos. Platell
201346WestminsterThos. de TrentJohn de Wyke
211347WestminsterJohn de WykeJohn Steerman
221348WestminsterRoger de ManyngfordWm. Hackevill
221348WestminsterJohn de WykeWalter de Thornhull
241350WestminsterJohn LuffJohn Piggon
281354WestminsterJohn PiggonJohn Luff
291355WestminsterRobt. FoventJohn Sharnthorne
311357WestminsterWalter PerieEdwd. Barnabe
321358WestminsterJohn PiggonJohn Luff
331359WestminsterJohn WiltonLawrence Pynge
341360WestminsterEdmund. BarnabeThos. Aleron/Alton
341360WestminsterJohn PiggonEdmund. Barnabe
361362WestminsterWm. SmallberghJohn Moryn
371363WestminsterWalter HenleyAlan Caunsted
431369WestminsterWalter HenleyEdwd. Barnabe
451371WinchesterWalter Henley
471373WestminsterWm. AnketillJohn Luff
Richard 2  from1377
11377WestminsterWalter HauleThos. Bache
21378WestminsterWalter HauleThos. Bache
31379WestminsterWalter HauleghThos. Cammell
51381WestminsterWalter HauleghThos. Cammell
61382WestminsterWalter HauleghThos. Seaward
ParliamentFirst memberSecond member
1386 Edward Leante Richard Payn [2]
1388 (Feb) Thomas Cammell Thomas Seward [2]
1388 (Sep) Hugh Croxhale Roger Pyjon [2]
1390 (Jan) Thomas Cammell Robert Fovent [2]
1390 (Nov)
1391 Thomas Cammell John Whiting [2]
1393 Thomas Cammell Walter Biere [2]
1394 Thomas Cammell Robert Biere [2]
1395 John Whiting Walter Biere [2]
1397 (Jan) John Hordere Walter Biere [2]
1397 (Sep) Hugh Croxhale Walter Biere [2]
1399 Thomas Cammell Walter Biere [2]
1401
1402 Thomas Cammell Walter Biere [2]
1404 (Jan)
1404 (Oct)
1406 Robert Frye II John Scarburgh [2]
1407 John Bole John Bremle [2]
1410 John Bole Walter Biere [2]
1411
1413 (Feb)
1413 (May) John Bole Walter Biere [2]
1414 (Apr) Thomas Haselmere John Pyjon [2]
1414 (Nov) Thomas Hat Walter Biere [2]
1415
1416 (Mar)
1416 (Oct)
1417 Robert Frye Walter Biere [2]
1419 Robert Squibbe John Clerk [2]
1420 Robert Squibbe John Bole [2]
1421 (May) Robert Squibbe John Clerk [2]
1421 (Dec) Robert Squibbe John Hody [2]
1510–1523No names known [3]
1529 William More John Mathew [3]
1536 ?
1539 ?
1542 ?
1545 William More Robert Grove [3]
1547 John Arundell Henry Ashley [3]
1553 (Mar) ?
1553 (Nov) John Gapputh John Fuell [3]
1554 (Apr) John Denham [3]
Parliament of 1554 (Nov) John Plympton [3]
Parliament of 1555 Matthew Arundell John Foster [3]
Parliament of 1558 William Grove Hugh Hawker [3]
Parliament of 1559 Sir John Zouche Henry Coker [4]
Parliament of 1563–1567 Henry Iden William Jordyn [4]
Parliament of 1571 John Long Thomas Morgan [4]
Parliament of 1572–1581 Robert Grove Charles Vaughan [4]
Parliament of 1584–1585 Thomas Cavendish Bartholomew Kemp [4]
Parliament of 1586–1587 Francis Zouche Gregory Sprint [4]
Parliament of 1588–1589 Thomas Crompton Michael Hicks [4]
Parliament of 1593 Arthur Atye [4]
Parliament of 1597–1598 John Budden John Davies [4]
Parliament of 1601 Arthur Messenger John Budden
Parliament of 1604–1611 Robert Hopton
Addled Parliament (1614) Henry Croke Sir Miles Sandys sat for Cambridge University
In his place Sir Simeon Steward
Parliament of 1621–1622 William Beecher Expelled from the House
In his place Percy Herbert
Thomas Sheppard Expelled from the House
In his place Ralph Hopton
Happy Parliament (1624–1625) William Whitaker John Thoroughgood
Useless Parliament (1625)
Parliament of 1625–1626 William Whitaker Samuel Turner
Parliament of 1628–1629 John Thoroughgood Sir John Croke
No Parliament summoned 1629–1640

1640–1832

YearFirst memberFirst partySecond memberSecond party
April 1640 William Whitaker Parliamentarian Edward Hyde [5] Royalist
1640 Samuel Turner Royalist
November 1640
January 1644Turner disabled from sitting – seat vacant
1645 John Bingham
1646 George Starre
1647 John Fry
February 1651Fry expelled – seat vacant
1653Shaftesbury was unrepresented in the Barebones Parliament and the First and Second Parliaments of the Protectorate
January 1659 Henry Whitaker James Baker
May 1659 John Bingham One seat vacant
April 1660 Thomas Grove James Baker
1661 Henry Whitaker John Lowe
1667 John Bennett
1677 Thomas Bennett
1679 Sir Matthew Andrews
1685 Sir Henry Butler John Bowles
1689 Sir Matthew Andrews Edward Nicholas
1698 Henry Cornish
1699 Thomas Chafin
1701 Sir John Cropley
1710 Edward Seymour
1711 Henry Whitaker
January 1715 Samuel Rush [6]
May 1715 William Benson [7] Whig
1719 Sir Edward des Bouverie
1726 Stephen Fox
1734 Jacob Banks Philip Bennet [8]
1735 Stephen Fox
1738 Philip Bennet
1741 Peter Walter Charles Ewer
1742 George Pitt [9] Tory
June 1747 Cuthbert Ellison
December 1747 William Beckford
1754 [10] Hon. James Brudenell Sir Thomas Clavering Whig
1761 [10] Sir Gilbert Heathcote Whig Samuel Touchet Whig
1768 [10] William Chaffin Grove (Sir) Ralph Payne
1771 [10] Francis Sykes
1774 [10] Thomas Rumbold
1775 [10] Seat declared vacant pending by-election Hans Winthrop Mortimer [11] Independent
1776 [10] George Rous
1780 [10] Sir Thomas Rumbold [12] (Sir) Francis Sykes [13]
1781 [10] Hans Winthrop Mortimer Independent
1784 [10] Adam Drummond
1786 [10] John Drummond
1790 Charles Duncombe Tory [14] William Grant Tory [14]
1793 Paul Benfield
1796 Walter Boyd
1802 Edward Loveden Loveden Robert Hurst
1806 Captain Sir Home Riggs Popham
1807 Whig [14] Thomas Wallace Whig [14]
1812 Richard Bateman-Robson Whig [14] Hudson Gurney Whig [14]
1813 [15] Charles Wetherell Tory [14] Edward Kerrison Tory [14]
1818 John Bacon Sawrey Morritt Henry John Shepherd
1820 Edward Harbord Abraham Moore
1821 Ralph Leycester Whig [16]
1822 Lord Robert Grosvenor Whig
1826 Edward Davies Davenport Whig [17]
1830 Edward Penrhyn Whig [14] William Stratford Dugdale Tory [14]
1831 William Leader Maberly Whig [14]
1832 Representation reduced to one member

1832–1885

YearMemberParty
1832 John Sayer Poulter Whig [14] [18] [19]
1838 [20] George Mathew Conservative [14]
1841 Lord Howard of Effingham Whig [14] [21] [22]
1845 Richard Brinsley Sheridan Whig [23] [24] [25] [26]
1852 Hon. Henry Portman Whig [27]
1857 George Glyn Whig
1859 Liberal
1873 Vere Benett-Stanford Conservative
1880 Hon. Sidney Glyn Liberal
1885 Constituency abolished

Election results

Elections in the 1830s

General election 1830: Shaftesbury [14] [28]
PartyCandidateVotes%
Whig Edward Penrhyn 169 38.9
Tory William Stratford Dugdale 145 33.3
Radical Sir Francis Charles Knowles, 3rd Baronet12127.8
Turnout 270c.77.1
Registered electors c.350
Majority245.6
Whig hold
Majority245.5
Tory gain from Whig

Dugdale resigned, causing a by-election.

By-election, 19 April 1831: Shaftesbury [28]
PartyCandidateVotes%
Whig William Leader Maberly Unopposed
Whig gain from Tory
General election 1831: Shaftesbury [14] [28]
PartyCandidateVotes%±%
Whig Edward Penrhyn 171 28.7 +9.3
Whig William Leader Maberly 168 28.2 +8.8
Radical Sir Francis Charles Knowles, 3rd Baronet13322.45.4
Tory Dominick Trant12320.712.6
Majority257.5N/A
Turnout c.298c.85.0c.+7.9
Registered electors c.350
Whig hold Swing +7.8
Whig gain from Tory Swing +7.6
General election 1832: Shaftesbury [14] [29]
PartyCandidateVotes%±%
Whig John Sayer Poulter 318 60.2 +32.0
Whig Edward Penrhyn 21039.8+11.1
Majority10820.4+12.9
Turnout 52883.31.7
Registered electors 634
Whig hold Swing +10.5
General election 1835: Shaftesbury [14] [29]
PartyCandidateVotes%±%
Whig John Sayer Poulter 237 61.6 +1.4
Conservative William Best [30] 14838.4New
Majority8923.2+2.8
Turnout 38569.513.8
Registered electors 554
Whig hold Swing +1.4
General election 1837: Shaftesbury [14] [29]
PartyCandidateVotes%±%
Whig John Sayer Poulter 224 50.6 11.0
Conservative George Mathew 21949.4+11.0
Majority51.222.0
Turnout 44389.3+19.8
Registered electors 496
Whig hold Swing 11.0

Elections in the 1840s

General election 1841: Shaftesbury [29]
PartyCandidateVotes%±%
Whig Henry Howard 219 52.0 +1.4
Conservative George Mathew 20248.01.4
Majority174.0+2.8
Turnout 42184.74.6
Registered electors 497
Whig hold Swing +1.4

Howard succeeded to the peerage, becoming 2nd Earl of Effingham, causing a by-election.

By-election, 5 March 1845: Shaftesbury [29]
PartyCandidateVotes%±%
Whig Richard Brinsley Sheridan Unopposed
Whig hold
General election 1847: Shaftesbury [29]
PartyCandidateVotes%±%
Whig Richard Brinsley Sheridan 213 54.8 +2.8
Conservative Richard Bethell 17645.22.8
Majority379.6+5.6
Turnout 38980.44.3
Registered electors 484
Whig hold Swing +2.8

Elections in the 1850s

General election 1852: Shaftesbury [29]
PartyCandidateVotes%±%
Whig Henry Portman Unopposed
Registered electors 509
Whig hold
General election 1857: Shaftesbury [29]
PartyCandidateVotes%±%
Whig George Glyn Unopposed
Registered electors 540
Whig hold
General election 1859: Shaftesbury [29]
PartyCandidateVotes%±%
Liberal George Glyn Unopposed
Registered electors 515
Liberal hold

Elections in the 1860s

General election 1865: Shaftesbury [29]
PartyCandidateVotes%±%
Liberal George Glyn Unopposed
Registered electors 461
Liberal hold
General election 1868: Shaftesbury [29]
PartyCandidateVotes%±%
Liberal George Glyn Unopposed
Registered electors 1,311
Liberal hold

Elections in the 1870s

Glyn succeeded to the peerage, becoming Lord Wolverton and causing a by-election.

By-election, 30 Aug 1873: Shaftesbury [29]
PartyCandidateVotes%±%
Conservative Vere Benett-Stanford 603 53.0 New
Liberal Henry Danby Seymour [31] 53447.0N/A
Majority696.0N/A
Turnout 1,13786.7N/A
Registered electors 1,311
Conservative gain from Liberal Swing N/A
General election 1874: Shaftesbury [29]
PartyCandidateVotes%±%
Conservative Vere Benett-Stanford 591 51.3 N/A
Liberal Henry Danby Seymour [31] 56248.7N/A
Majority292.6N/A
Turnout 1,15389.7N/A
Registered electors 1,286
Conservative gain from Liberal Swing N/A

Elections in the 1880s

General election 1880: Shaftesbury [29]
PartyCandidateVotes%±%
Liberal Sidney Glyn 652 51.3 +2.6
Conservative Vere Benett-Stanford 61848.72.6
Majority342.6N/A
Turnout 1,27091.5+1.8
Registered electors 1,388
Liberal gain from Conservative Swing +2.6

Notes

  1. Page 429, Lewis Namier, The Structure of Politics at the Accession of George III (2nd edition – London: St Martin's Press, 1957)
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 "History of Parliament". History of Parliament Trust. Retrieved 26 November 2011.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 "History of Parliament". History of Parliament Trust. Retrieved 26 November 2011.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 "History of Parliament". History of Parliament Trust. Retrieved 26 November 2011.
  5. Hyde was also elected for Wootton Bassett, which he chose to represent, and never sat for Shafesbury
  6. On petition, the election of 1715, at which Rush and Nicholas had been elected, was declared void. One of their opponent's, Benson, was declared duly elected in their place but the other, Henry Andrews, was found not to be eligible. A by-election was therefore held for the second seat, at which Nicholas was once more elected.
  7. In 1718, Benson was appointed Surveyor-General of His Majesty's Works, an office that required him to vacate his seat and stand for re-election. He won the by-election but, on petition, the result was overturned and des Bouverie declared elected instead.
  8. On petition, Bennet was declared not to have been duly elected, and his opponent Fox was seated in his place
  9. Pitt was re-elected in 1747, but had also been elected for Dorset, which he chose to represent, and did not sit again for Shaftesbury
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 J A Cannon (1964). "Shaftesbury". In Namier, Sir Lewis; Brooke, John (eds.). The House of Commons 1754-1790. The History of Parliament Trust . Retrieved 6 November 2022.
  11. At the election of 1774, Sykes and Rumbold were initially declared elected, but on petition the result was overturned and their only opponent, Mortimer, was declared elected; the Commons also ordered the prosecution of Sykes and Rumbold for bribery. The second seat was declared vacant and a by-election held.
  12. Rumbold was initially declared elected, but on petition the result was overturned and his opponent, Mortimer, was seated in his place.
  13. Created a baronet, June 1781
  14. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Stooks Smith, Henry. (1973) [1844-1850]. Craig, F. W. S. (ed.). The Parliaments of England (2nd ed.). Chichester: Parliamentary Research Services. pp.  91–92. ISBN   0-900178-13-2.
  15. Bateman-Robson and Gurney were initially returned as elected in the election of 1812, but on petition (Journals of the House of Commons, Volume 68 p 12 1812–1813) their opponents, Wetherell and Kerrison, were declared elected
  16. Farrell, Stephen. "LEYCESTER, Ralph (1763–1835), of Toft Hall, Cheshire and 65 Portland Place, Mdx". The History of Parliament. Retrieved 25 April 2020.
  17. Farrell, Stephen. "DAVENPORT, Edward Davies (1778–1847), of Calveley, Cheshire". The History of Parliament. Retrieved 25 April 2020.
  18. Churton, Edward (1838). The Assembled Commons or Parliamentary Biographer: 1838. p. 186.
  19. Mosse, Richard Bartholomew (1838). The Parliamentary Guide: a concise history of the Members of both Houses, etc. p. 207.
  20. At the election of 1837, Poulter was initially declared re-elected, but on petition his election was declared void and after scrutiny of the votes his opponent, Mathew, was declared duly elected
  21. "Shaftesbury" . Dublin Evening Post. 29 June 1841. p. 3 via British Newspaper Archive.
  22. "Devonshire" . Dorset County Chronicle. 3 June 1841. pp. 3–4 via British Newspaper Archive.
  23. "London Electoral History — Steps Towards Democracy: 6.2 History of Elections in Westminster, 1749–1852" (PDF). London Electoral History 1700-1850. Newcastle University. p. 11. Retrieved 6 May 2018.
  24. Roberts, Andrew. "Biographies of Honorary (Unpaid) Lunacy Commissioners 1828-1912". THE LUNACY COMMISSION, A STUDY OF ITS ORIGIN, EMERGENCE AND CHARACTER. Middlesex University. Retrieved 6 May 2018.
  25. The Illustrated London News, Volume 6. Illustrated London News & Sketch Limited. 1845. p. 151 via Google Books.
  26. "House of Commons, Friday" . Nottingham Review and General Advertiser for the Midland Counties. 14 March 1845. p. 2 via British Newspaper Archive.
  27. "Dorset Chronicle" . 19 March 1857. p. 9 via British Newspaper Archive.
  28. 1 2 3 Farrell, Stephen. "Shaftesbury". The History of Parliament. Retrieved 25 April 2020.
  29. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Craig, F. W. S., ed. (1977). British Parliamentary Election Results 1832-1885 (e-book) (1st ed.). London: Macmillan Press. p. 272. ISBN   978-1-349-02349-3.
  30. "Page 2" . The Sun. 10 January 1835 via British Newspaper Archive.
  31. 1 2 "An Alleged Election Libel" . Edinburgh Evening News . 16 February 1874. p. 3 via British Newspaper Archive.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bridgwater (UK Parliament constituency)</span> Parliamentary constituency in the United Kingdom, 1885–2010 and 2024 onwards

Bridgwater is a parliamentary constituency represented in the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It elects one Member of Parliament (MP) by the first past the post system of election.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Taunton (UK Parliament constituency)</span> Parliamentary constituency in the United Kingdom, 1885–2010

Taunton was a constituency represented in the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom and its predecessors from 1295 to 2010, taking its name from the town of Taunton in Somerset. Until 1918, it was a parliamentary borough, electing two Member of Parliaments (MPs) between 1295 and 1885 and one from 1885 to 1918; the name was then transferred to a county constituency, electing one MP.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thomas Rumbold</span> British politician

Sir Thomas Rumbold, 1st Baronet was a British administrator in India and politician who sat in the House of Commons between 1770 and 1790. He served as Governor of Madras from 1777 to 1780. He became infamous for his corruption and, for in effect stealing, the ring of the Nawab of Arcot. He brought home from India 1.5 million pagodas or about £600,000 and was a classic example of a nabob. Attempts were made to investigate the misdemeanour by Henry Dundas but the case did not make much headway.

Bewdley was the name of a constituency of the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1605 until 1950. Until 1885 it was a parliamentary borough in Worcestershire, represented by one Member of Parliament; the name was then transferred to a county constituency from 1885 until 1950. Its MPs included the former Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin, who represented the seat from 1908 to 1937, and afterwards took the name of the constituency as part of his title when he was raised to the peerage.

Weymouth and Melcombe Regis was a parliamentary borough in Dorset represented in the English House of Commons, later in that of Great Britain, and finally in the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It was formed by the Union of Weymouth and Melcombe Regis Act 1571 which amalgamated the existing boroughs of Weymouth and Melcombe Regis. Until 1832, the combined borough continued to elect the four Members of Parliament (MPs) to which its constituent parts had previously been entitled; the Great Reform Act reduced its representation to two Members, and the constituency was abolished altogether in 1885, becoming part of the new South Dorset constituency.

Dorchester was a parliamentary constituency centred on the town of Dorchester in Dorset. It returned two Members of Parliament to the House of Commons of England, Great Britain and House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1295 to 1868, when its representation was reduced to one member.

Helston, sometimes known as Helleston, was a parliamentary borough centred on the small town of Helston in Cornwall.

Radnor or New Radnor was a constituency in Wales between 1542 and 1885; it elected one Member of Parliament (MP) to the House of Commons of the Parliaments of England (1542–1707), Great Britain (1707–1800) and the United Kingdom (1801–1885), by the first past the post electoral system. In the Redistribution of Seats Act 1885, the division was merged into Radnorshire.

Sudbury was a parliamentary constituency which was represented in the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom.

Cricklade was a parliamentary constituency named after the town of Cricklade in Wiltshire.

New Shoreham, sometimes simply called Shoreham, was a parliamentary borough centred on the town of Shoreham-by-Sea in what is now West Sussex. It returned two Members of Parliament (MPs) to the House of Commons of England from 1295 to 1707, then to the House of Commons of Great Britain until 1800, and finally to the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1801 until it was abolished by the Redistribution of Seats Act 1885, with effect from the 1885 general election.

Ilchester was a constituency of the House of Commons of the Parliament of England, then of the Parliament of Great Britain from 1707 to 1800 and of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1801 to 1832. It was represented by two Members of Parliament until 1832. It was one of the most notoriously corrupt rotten boroughs.

Boston was a parliamentary borough in Lincolnshire, which elected two Members of Parliament (MPs) to the House of Commons from 1547 until 1885, and then one member from 1885 until 1918, when the constituency was abolished.

Bramber was a parliamentary borough in Sussex, one of the most notorious of all the rotten boroughs. It elected two Members of Parliament (MPs) to the House of Commons in 1295, and again from 1472 until 1832, when the constituency was abolished by the Great Reform Act.

Corfe Castle was a parliamentary borough in Dorset, which elected two Members of Parliament (MPs) to the House of Commons from 1572 until 1832, when it was abolished by the Great Reform Act.

Steyning was a parliamentary borough in Sussex, England, which elected two Members of Parliament (MPs) to the House of Commons sporadically from 1298 and continuously from 1467 until 1832. It was a notorious rotten borough, and was abolished by the Great Reform Act.

Whitchurch was a parliamentary borough in the English County of Hampshire, which elected two Members of Parliament (MPs) to the Unreformed House of Commons from 1586 until 1832, when the borough was abolished by the Great Reform Act.

Stockbridge was a parliamentary borough in Hampshire, which elected two Members of Parliament (MPs) to the House of Commons from 1563 until 1832, when the borough was abolished by the Great Reform Act. It was one of the more egregiously rotten boroughs, and the first to have its status threatened for its corruption by a parliamentary bill to disfranchise it, though the proposal was defeated.

Hindon was a parliamentary borough consisting of the village of Hindon in Wiltshire, which elected two Members of Parliament (MPs) to the House of Commons from 1448 until 1832, when the borough was abolished by the Great Reform Act. It was one of the most notoriously corrupt of the rotten boroughs, and bills to disfranchise Hindon were debated in Parliament on two occasions before its eventual abolition.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hans Winthrop Mortimer</span>

Hans Winthrop Mortimer (1734–1807) was a British property speculator and politician who sat in the House of Commons between 1775 and 1790.

References