Study 329

Last updated

In October 2011 the United States Department of Justice filed a lawsuit under the False Claims Act accusing GSK of promoting drugs for unapproved uses, failing to report safety data, reporting false prices to Medicaid, and paying kickbacks to physicians in the form of gifts, trips and sham consultancy fees. The complaint included preparing the JAACAP article about study 329, exaggerating paroxetine's efficacy while downplaying the risks, and using the article to promote the drug for adolescent use, which was not approved by the FDA. [23]

GSK pleaded guilty in 2012 and paid a $3 billion settlement, including a criminal fine of $1 billion. The fine included an amount for "preparing, publishing and distributing a misleading medical journal article that misreported that a clinical trial of Paxil demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of depression in patients under age 18, when the study failed to demonstrate efficacy". [23] [lower-alpha 10]

Calls for retraction

Jon Jureidini Jon Jureidini, 22 May 2010 (2).jpg
Jon Jureidini

Child psychiatrist Jon Jureidini of the Women's and Children's Hospital in Adelaide and Ann Tonkin of the University of Adelaide asked JAACAP in 2003 to retract the study 329 paper. [1] [91] [lower-alpha 11]

In 2005 the philosopher Leemon McHenry complained to JAACAP's editor, Mina Dulcan, that Keller and some of the other researchers named as authors had worked for GSK but had not declared their conflict of interest and had violated the journal's policy regarding authorship. [43] Keller had acted as a consultant for several drug companies. The Boston Globe reported in 1999 that he had earned $500,000 the previous year from consultancy work, which, the newspaper said, he did not disclose to the journals that published his work or to the American Psychiatric Association. [93] Dulcan replied to McHenry that "unless there is a specific accusation of research fraud, it is not the role of scientific journals to police authorship." [94]

Jureidini and McHenry called again for the paper's retraction in 2009. Editor-in-chief Andrés Martin replied that there was no justification for retraction, and that the journal had "conformed to the best publication practices prevailing at the time". [43] In April 2013 Jureidini asked GSK's CEO Andrew Witty to request retraction. [2] [95]

RIAT re-analysis of study 329

In July 2013 Jureidini announced his intention to produce a new write-up of study 329 in accordance with the RIAT initiative (restoring invisible and abandoned trials). [96] [95] The RIAT researchers—Joanna Le Noury, John M. Nardo, David Healy, Jon Jureidini, Melissa Raven, Catalin Tufanaru, and Elia Abi-Jaoude—published their re-analysis in the BMJ in September 2015. They concluded that "[t]he efficacy of paroxetine and imipramine was not statistically or clinically significantly different from placebo for any prespecified primary or secondary efficacy outcome," and that there were "clinically significant increases in ... suicidal ideation and behaviour and other serious adverse events in the paroxetine group and cardiovascular problems in the imipramine group." [26]

Anti-depressants and suicidality in young people

In 2007 the FDA required that all anti-depressants include a boxed warning of an increased risk of suicidal thoughts and behaviour in young adults (18–24 years) during the first one to two months of treatment. [97] [lower-alpha 12] A 2012 Cochrane review on the use of SSRIs in children and adolescents concluded that there is evidence of an increased suicide risk in patients treated with antidepressants. It added: "However, given the risks of untreated depression in terms of completed suicide and impacts on functioning, if a decision to use medication is agreed, then fluoxetine might be the medication of first choice given guideline recommendations." [lower-alpha 13]

See also

Notes

  1. SmithKline Beecham (October 1998): "Study 329 (conducted in the US) showed trends in efficacy in favour of Seroxat/Paxil across all indices of depression. However, the study failed to demonstrate a statistically significant difference from placebo on the primary efficacy measures." [11]
    U.S. Food and Drug Administration to GlaxoSmithKline (21 October 2002): "We agree that ... the results from Studies 329, 377, and 701 failed to demonstrate the efficacy of Paxil in pediatric patients with MDD. Given the fact that negative trials are frequently seen, even for antidepressant drugs that we know are effective, we agree that it would not be useful to describe these negative trials in labeling." [12]
    UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency report (6 March 2008): "The first trial conducted by SKB, trial number 329, failed to show that Seroxat was effective in treating major depressive disorder in children. A second trial, number 377, was conducted and this also failed to show that Seroxat was effective. Both studies were completed towards the end of 1998. SKB made no amendment to the SPC on the basis of these data. An internal GSK management document (which subsequently came into the public domain) dated October 1998 says that 'it would be commercially unacceptable to include a statement that efficacy had not been demonstrated, as this would undermine the profile of paroxetine'. During 1999, 32,000 Seroxat prescriptions were issued to children in the UK." [13]
  2. 1 2 Wayne Kondro and Barbara Sibbald ( Canadian Medical Association Journal , 2004): "Study 329 was eventually published (J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2001;40[7]:762-72) in 2001. The authors concluded that paroxetine is 'generally well tolerated and effective for major depression in adolescents.' Among the 93 adolescents taking Seroxat, there were 5 serious cases of 'emotional lability' (e.g., suicidal ideation/gestures). Among the 95 patients taking the comparison treatment, imipramine (Tofranil), there was 1 such case, and among the 89 subjects receiving placebo there was also 1. According to the article, only 1 serious adverse event—headache in 1 patient—was considered by the treating investigator to be related to paroxetine treatment." [15]
  3. In August 2001, a month after publication, a member of GSK's Paxil Product Management team sent a memo to "all sales representatives selling Paxil" calling study 329 a "'cutting-edge,' landmark study", and stating that "Paxil demonstrates REMARKABLE Efficacy and Safety in the treatment of adolescent depression." [16]
  4. Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (6 March 2008): "The significance of the data provided in the GSK briefing document was that they represented robust evidence from controlled studies of a causal association between an SSRI and suicidal behaviour. It had previously been argued by some manufacturers that a causal link could not be drawn between suicidality and SSRIs because no link was evident from (adult) clinical trial data. On examination of the full clinical trial data in children submitted by GSK urgently on 27 May 2003 in response to requests from the Agency, it became clear that the evidence base for the safety concern of an increased risk of suicidal behaviour was derived from pooled analysis of all the trials (a meta-analysis). It was only when the trials were analysed together that the safety issue became apparent. These trials had been conducted over a number of years and some had been published in part, however the publications gave an incomplete and partial picture of the full data. Importantly, the trials conducted in a range of conditions in children and adolescents failed to demonstrate that Seroxat was effective in the treatment of depressive illness." [18]
  5. United States Department of Justice (2 July 2012): "The United States alleges that, among other things, GSK participated in preparing, publishing and distributing a misleading medical journal article that misreported that a clinical trial of Paxil demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of depression in patients under age 18, when the study failed to demonstrate efficacy." [23]
  6. Melanie Newman, BMJ, 2010: "Study 329's results showed that paroxetine was no more effective than the placebo according to measurements of eight outcomes specified by Martin Keller, professor of psychiatry at Brown University, when he first drew up the trial.
    "Two of these were primary outcomes: the change in total Hamilton Rating Scale (HAM-D) score, and the proportion of 'responders' at the end of the eight-week acute treatment phase (those with a ≥50% reduction in HAM-D or a HAM-D score ≤8). The drug also showed no significant effect for the initial six secondary outcome measures.
    "The drug only produced a positive result when four new secondary outcome measures, which were introduced following the initial data analysis, were used instead. Fifteen other new secondary outcome measures failed to throw up positive results." [25]
  7. Study 377 was conducted in 33 centres in Europe (Belgium, Netherlands, Italy, Spain, UK), Canada, South America (Argentina and Mexico), South Africa and the United Arab Emirates. [36]
  8. In 1993, for example, STI sent a proposal to GSK for a meeting between its psychiatrist advisory board and Paxil advisory board in the Ritz Carlton Hotel in Palm Beach, Florida. [39]
  9. NICK ALCOCK, pharmaceutical company analyst ("The Secrets of Seroxat", BBC Panorama, 13 October 2002): "In the United States, if a company such as GlaxoSmithKline can gain an additional licence for the treatment of children, it means that they get a six month extension to their overall patent."
    JOFRE: "And is that worth a lot of money?"
    ALCOCK: "For Paxil it's worth ... six month's worth of sales is around a billion dollars, so yes."
    JOFRE: "That billion dollar windfall now looks tantalisingly close, thanks to a recent study co-written by American child psychiatrist Neal Ryan. It was the biggest ever trial of Seroxat in children funded by Glaxo SmithKline. The depressed children who took Seroxat did better than those who took an older drug, or were just given sugar pills. That's the good news. The bad news is that ten of the ninety-three children on Seroxat suffered serious psychiatric problems within weeks of going on the drug. Most of them had to be hospitalised. There were five children out of ninety-three children on Seroxat who had suicidal thoughts and gestures. Another five out of that ninety-three had serious psychiatric side effects. Don't you think parents would be worried about that if their child was to be given this drug?"
    Dr ALASTAIR BENBOW, Head of European Clinical Psychiatry, GlaxoSmithKline: "I think what parents would be more worried about is the risk that their children have of committing suicide and other symptoms of severe depression if no treatment was available. I think parents would want treatments to be properly evaluated during clinical trials before their children are given any medicine."
    JOFRE: "But the evidence here suggest that their children might be at more risk of suicide if they go on Seroxat."
    BENBOW: "No, the evidence is not there, there is no statistical difference between the groups. The reality of the situation is that in this trial, Seroxat was generally well tolerated by this difficult to treat population." [51]
  10. Simon Neville (The Guardian, 3 July 2012): "GSK also published an article in a medical journal that mis-stated the drug's safety for children, despite the journal asking several times to change the wording.
    "Copies of the misleading article were given to sales representatives to pass on to doctors in the hope that it would secure more business. Tickets to sports matches were exchanged for discussions about Paxil, with one doctor writing: 'Dinner and a Yankee game with family. Talked about Paxil studies in children.'
    "Despite knowing that three trials had failed to prove its effectiveness on children, Glaxo published a report entitled 'Positioning Paxil in the adolescent depression market – getting a headstart'". [90]
  11. The Committee on Publication Ethics states that journal editors should consider retracting an article if, inter alia, "they have clear evidence that the findings are unreliable, either as a result of misconduct ... or honest error." [92]
  12. Food and Drug Administration (June 2014): "Paxil and other antidepressant medicines may increase suicidal thoughts or actions in some children, teenagers, or young adults within the first few months of treatment or when the dose is changed." [98]
  13. Sarah E. Hetrick, et al. (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 14 November 2012): "Caution is required in interpreting the results given the methodological limitations of the included trials in terms of internal and external validity. Further, the size and clinical meaningfulness of statistically significant results are uncertain. However, given the risks of untreated depression in terms of completed suicide and impacts on functioning, if a decision to use medication is agreed, then fluoxetine might be the medication of first choice given guideline recommendations. Clinicians need to keep in mind that there is evidence of an increased risk of suicide-related outcomes in those treated with antidepressant medications." [99]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Antidepressant</span> Class of medication used to treat depression and other conditions

Antidepressants are a class of medications used to treat major depressive disorder, anxiety disorders, chronic pain, and addiction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paroxetine</span> SSRI antidepressant medication

Paroxetine, sold under the brand names Paxil and Seroxat among others, is an antidepressant of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) class. It is used to treat major depressive disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and premenstrual dysphoric disorder. It has also been used in the treatment of premature ejaculation and hot flashes due to menopause. It is taken orally.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sertraline</span> Antidepressant (SSRI class) medication

Sertraline, sold under the brand name Zoloft among others, is an antidepressant of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) class. The effectiveness of sertraline for depression is similar to that of other antidepressants, and the differences are mostly confined to side effects. Sertraline is better tolerated than the older tricyclic antidepressants. Sertraline is effective for panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), and obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD). Although approved for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), sertraline leads to only modest improvement in this condition. Sertraline also alleviates the symptoms of premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) and can be used in sub-therapeutic doses or intermittently for its treatment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">GSK plc</span> UK healthcare company

GSK plc is a British multinational pharmaceutical and biotechnology company with global headquarters in London. It was established in 2000 by a merger of Glaxo Wellcome and SmithKline Beecham, which was itself a merger of a number of pharmaceutical companies around the Smith, Kline & French firm.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rosiglitazone</span> Chemical compound

Rosiglitazone is an antidiabetic drug in the thiazolidinedione class. It works as an insulin sensitizer, by binding to the PPAR in fat cells and making the cells more responsive to insulin. It is marketed by the pharmaceutical company GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) as a stand-alone drug or for use in combination with metformin or with glimepiride. First released in 1999, annual sales peaked at approximately $2.5-billion in 2006; however, following a meta-analysis in 2007 that linked the drug's use to an increased risk of heart attack, sales plummeted to just $9.5-million in 2012. The drug's patent expired in 2012.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Reboxetine</span> NRI antidepressant drug

Reboxetine, sold under the brand name Edronax among others, is a drug of the norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (NRI) class, marketed as an antidepressant by Pfizer for use in the treatment of major depression, although it has also been used off-label for panic disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It is approved for use in many countries worldwide, but has not been approved for use in the United States. Although its effectiveness as an antidepressant has been challenged in multiple published reports, its popularity has continued to increase.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eszopiclone</span> Hypnotic medication

Eszopiclone, sold under the brand name Lunesta among others, is a medication used in the treatment of insomnia. Evidence supports slight to moderate benefit up to six months. It is taken by mouth.

Martin Keller is an American psychiatrist. He is Professor Emeritus of Psychiatry and Human Behavior at Brown Medical School in Providence, Rhode Island.

Harold Samuel Koplewicz is a nationally known child and adolescent psychiatrist. He is the founder and president of the nonprofit Child Mind Institute and editor-in-chief of the Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">NS-2359</span> Chemical compound

NS-2359 (GSK-372475) is a serotonin-norepinephrine-dopamine reuptake inhibitor. It was under development by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) as an antidepressant, but was discontinued in 2009 when phase II clinical trials showed the drug was not effective and not well tolerated. The results did not support further effort by the company. NS-2359 was also in clinical trials for the treatment of ADHD, phase II having been completed in 2007. A phase I clinical trial exploring the effect of NS-2359 on cocaine-dependent individuals was completed in 2002.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Losmapimod</span> Chemical compound

Losmapimod (GW856553X) is an investigational drug being developed by Fulcrum Therapeutics for the treatment of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD); a phase III clinical trial is pending approval. Losmapimod selectively inhibits enzymes p38α/β mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), which are modulators of DUX4 expression and mediators of inflammation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor</span> Class of antidepressant medication

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are a class of drugs that are typically used as antidepressants in the treatment of major depressive disorder, anxiety disorders, and other psychological conditions.

The American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (AACAP) is a 501(c)(3) non-profit professional association in the United States dedicated to facilitating psychiatric care for children and adolescents. The Academy is headquartered in Washington, D.C. Various levels of membership are available to physicians specialized in child psychiatry or pediatrics, as well as medical students interested in the field, in the United States and abroad.

<i>Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry</i> Peer-reviewed scientific journal

The Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry is a peer-reviewed medical journal covering pediatric psychiatry. It is published by Elsevier and is the official journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. The editor-in-chief is Douglas Novins.

The relationship between antidepressant use and suicide risk is a subject of medical research and has faced varying levels of debate. This problem was thought to be serious enough to warrant intervention by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to label greater likelihood of suicide as a risk of using antidepressants. Some studies have shown that the use of certain antidepressants correlate with an increased risk of suicide in some patients relative to other antidepressants. However, these conclusions have faced considerable scrutiny and disagreement: A multinational European study indicated that antidepressants decrease risk of suicide at the population level, and other reviews of antidepressant use claim that there is not enough data to indicate antidepressant use increases risk of suicide.

David L. Dunner is a psychiatrist in Washington, United States, who has conducted pioneering research into mood disorders, anxiety disorders and their treatment. He has authored or co-authored more than 250 articles and more than 10 books.

Stan Kutcher is a Canadian Senator and Professor Emeritus of Psychiatry at Dalhousie University. He was appointed to the Senate of Canada on 12 December 2018.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sotrovimab</span> Monoclonal antibody

Sotrovimab, sold under the brand name Xevudy, is a human neutralizing monoclonal antibody with activity against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, known as SARS-CoV-2. It was developed by GlaxoSmithKline and Vir Biotechnology, Inc. Sotrovimab is designed to attach to the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2.

Outcome switching is the practice of changing the primary or secondary outcomes of a clinical trial after its initiation. An outcome is the goal of the clinical trial, such as survival after five years for cancer treatment. Outcome switching can lead to bias and undermine the reliability of the trial, for instance when outcomes are switched after researchers already have access to trial data. That way, researchers can cherry pick an outcome which is statistically significant.

References

  1. 1 2 Jureidini, Jon; Tonkin, Ann (May 2003). "Paroxetine in major depression", Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 42(5), p. 514. doi : 10.1097/01.CHI.0000046825.95464.DA PMID   12707552
  2. 1 2 Jureidini, Jon. (26 April 2013). Letter to Andrew Witty, CEO, GlaxoSmithKline, courtesy of BMJ.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 Doshi, Peter (16 September 2015). "No correction, no retraction, no apology, no comment: paroxetine trial reanalysis raises questions about institutional responsibility", BMJ, 351. doi : 10.1136/bmj.h4629
  4. 1 2 Heck, Isabel (2 April 2014). "Controversial Paxil paper still under fire 13 years later", The Brown Daily Herald.
  5. "GSK's off-label marketing of Paxil", United States v. GlaxoSmithKline, United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, 26 October 2011, pp. 3–19.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 Keller, Martin B.; Ryan, Neal D.; Strober, Michael, et al. (July 2001). "Efficacy of paroxetine in the treatment of adolescent major depression: a randomized, controlled trial", Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40(7), pp. 762–772. doi:10.1097/00004583-200107000-00010 PMID   11437014
  7. 1 2 Feeley, Jeff; Fisk, Margaret Cronin (14 December 2009). "Glaxo Said to Have Paid $1 Billion in Paxil Suits (Update2)", Bloomberg.
  8. McGoey, Linsey; Jackson, Emily (February 2009). "Seroxat and the suppression of clinical trial data: regulatory failure and the uses of legal ambiguity", Journal of Medical Ethics, 35(2), pp. 107–112. doi:10.1136/jme.2008.025361 PMID   19181884 JSTOR   27720271
  9. 1 2 Godlee, Fiona (17 September 2015). "Study 329", BMJ, 351, 17 September 2015. doi : 10.1136/bmj.h4973
  10. Wilson, Clare (16 September 2015). "New look at antidepressant suicide risks from infamous trial", New Scientist.
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 "Seroxat/Paxil Adolescent Depression: Position piece on the phase III clinical studies", SmithKline Beecham, October 1998, courtesy of the Drug Industry Documents Archive, University of California, San Francisco; also available here, courtesy of the United States Department of Justice.
  12. Letter from FDA to GlaxoSmithKline, 21 October 2002, courtesy of the Drug Industry Documents Archive, University of California, San Francisco.
  13. "MHRA Investigation into GlaxoSmithKline/Seroxat", Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, 6 March 2008(a), (pp. 1–13), p. 2, para. 2.
  14. 1 2 3 Keller 2001, pp. 770–771.
  15. 1 2 3 4 5 Kondro, Wayne; Sibbald, Barbara (2 March 2004). "Drug company experts advised staff to withhold data about SSRI use in children", Canadian Medical Association Journal, 170(5), p. 783. doi:10.1503/cmaj.1040213 PMID   14993169
  16. 1 2 3 Hawkins, Zachary (18 August 2001). "To all sales representatives selling Paxil", Paxil Product Management, GlaxoSmithKline, courtesy of the Drug Industry Documents Archive, University of California, San Francisco.
  17. "MHRA Investigation into GlaxoSmithKline/Seroxat", Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, 6 March 2008(a).
  18. 1 2 MHRA, 6 March 2008(a), p. 5, para. 12.
  19. 1 2 "FDA statement regarding the anti-depressant Paxil for pediatric population", Food and Drug Administration, 19 June 2003, courtesy of the Drug Industry Documents Archive, University of California, San Francisco.
  20. "GSK investigation concludes", Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, press release, 6 March 2008(b).
    Letter from Kent Woods, MHRA, to Jean-Pierre Garnier, GSK, Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, 6 March 2008(c).
    "Transcription of a meeting at MHRA about Seroxat", Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, meeting with patient group, 29 April 2008.
  21. Jackson, Emily (2012). Law and the Regulation of Medicines, London: Bloomsbury Publishing, p. 109.
  22. Harris, Gardiner (27 August 2004). "Maker of Paxil to Release All Trial Results", The New York Times.
  23. 1 2 3 "GlaxoSmithKline to Plead Guilty and Pay $3 Billion to Resolve Fraud Allegations and Failure to Report Safety Data", United States Department of Justice, 2 July 2012.
    "GSK's off-label marketing of Paxil", United States v. GlaxoSmithKline], United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, 26 October 2011, pp. 3–19.
    United States v. GlaxoSmithKline, United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, 26 October 2011 (for paroxetine, pp. 3–19).
    Thomas, Katie; Schmidt, Michael S. (2 July 2012). "Glaxo Agrees to Pay $3 Billion in Fraud Settlement", The New York Times.
  24. "Seroxat: Statement from GlaxoSmithKline", 29 January 2007, courtesy of BBC News.
  25. 1 2 Newman, Melanie (11 December 2010). "The Rules of Retraction", BMJ, 341(7785), pp. 1246–1248. doi:10.1136/bmj.c6985 PMID   21138994 JSTOR   20800711 , p. 1246.
  26. 1 2 Le Noury, Joanna, et al. (16 September 2015). "Restoring Study 329: efficacy and harms of paroxetine and imipramine in treatment of major depression in adolescence", BMJ, 351. doi : 10.1136/bmj.h4320 PMID   26376805 PMC   4572084
  27. Henry, David; Fitzpatrick, Tiffany (16 September 2015)). "Liberating the data from clinical trials", BMJ, 351. doi : 10.1136/bmj.h4601
  28. Boseley, Sarah (16 September 2015). "Seroxat study under-reported harmful effects on young people, say scientists", The Guardian.
  29. 1 2 The People of the State of New York against GlaxoSmithKline, 2 June 2004, p. 2, para. 3.
  30. For university or hospital psychiatric departments, "Paroxetine (Seroxat) – Variation assessment report", MHRA, 4 June 2003, p. 6.
  31. Keller 2001, p. 763.
  32. Keller 2001, p. 764.
  33. 1 2 3 4 Jureidini, Jon N.; McHenry, Leemon B.; Mansfield, Peter R. (2008). "Clinical trials and drug promotion: Selective reporting of study 329", International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine, 20(1–2) (pp. 73–81), p. 74. doi:10.3233/JRS-2008-0426
  34. "Study drug: BRL29060/Paroxetine (Paxil)" Archived 12 July 2018 at the Wayback Machine , SmithKline Beecham, 20 August 1993, amended 24 March 1994.
  35. 1 2 3 Keller 2001, p. 769.
  36. "Paroxetine (Seroxat) – Variation assessment report", MHRA, 4 June 2003, p. 8.
  37. Jackie Westaway, SmithKline Beecham (14 October 1998) Memo, courtesy of the United States Department of Justice.
  38. 1 2 3 Laden, Sally K.; Romankiewicz, John A. (3 April 1998). "Adolescent Depression Study 329: Proposal for a Journal Article", Scientific Therapeutics Information, Inc.
  39. Romankiewicz, John A. (1 October 1993). "Paxil Advisory Board Meeting", Scientific Therapeutics Information.
  40. Deposition of Sally K. Laden, United States District Court, Northern District of California, 15 March 2007.
  41. Laden, Sally K. (18 December 1998). Sally Laden, STI, to Jim McCafferty, SmithKline Beecham, courtesy of the Drug Industry Documents Archive, University of California, San Francisco.
  42. Pretre, Caroline (6 February 2001). Caroline Pretre (STI) to Martin Keller, courtesy of the Drug Industry Documents Archive, University of California, San Francisco; Jureidini, McHenry, and Mansfield 2008.
  43. 1 2 3 Newman 2010, p. 1247.
  44. Laden, Sally K. (7 December 1998). Sally Laden, STI, to Jim McCafferty, SmithKline Beecham, courtesy of the Drug Industry Documents Archive, University of California, San Francisco.
  45. 1 2 3 Jureidini et al. 2008, p. 77.
  46. McCafferty, James P. (21 July 1999). James McCafferty, SmithKline Beecham, to Sally Laden, STI, courtesy of the Drug Industry Documents Archive, University of California, San Francisco.
  47. Newman 2010, p. 1247.
    Laden, Sally K. (24 August 2000). Sally Laden–Michael Strober–Boris Birmaher correspondence, courtesy of the Drug Industry Documents Archive, University of California, San Francisco.
  48. Laden, Sally K. (11 January 2001). Sally Laden to the Paxil Team, courtesy of the Drug Industry Documents Archive, University of California, San Francisco.
  49. MHRA, 6 March 2008(a), p. 2, para. 3.
  50. Bass, Alison (2008). Side Effects , Chapel Hill: Algonquin Books, p. 171.
    Laden, Sally (7 August 2001). Sally Laden to Jim McCafferty, courtesy of the Drug Industry Documents Archive, University of California, San Francisco.
    Laden, Sally (25 April 2001). Sally Laden to the Paxil Marketing Team, courtesy of the Drug Industry Documents Archive, University of California, San Francisco.
    Laden, Sally (27 April 2001). SmithKline Beecham to Sally Laden, courtesy of the Drug Industry Documents Archive, University of California, San Francisco.
  51. 1 2 3 "The Secrets of Seroxat", BBC Panorama, 13 October 2002 (transcript).
  52. 1 2 3 "Emails from the edge", BBC Panorama, 11 May 2003 (transcript).
  53. 1 2 "Taken on Trust", BBC Panorama, 3 October 2004 (transcript).
  54. 1 2 3 "Secrets of the drugs trials", BBC Panorama, 29 January 2007 (transcript).
    "Company hid suicide link", BBC News, 29 January 2007.
    "Seroxat: Statement from GlaxoSmithKline", BBC Panorama, 29 January 2007.
  55. Hilts, Philip J. (8 June 2001). "Jury Awards $6.4 Million In Killings Tied to Drug", The New York Times.
  56. Boseley, Sarah (9 August 2001). "'Four people dead is four too many'", The Guardian.
  57. MHRA, 6 March 2008(a), p. 2, para. 2.
  58. 1 2 3 MHRA, 6 March 2008(a), p. 4, para. 11.
  59. MHRA, 6 March 2008(a), p. 3, para. 7.
  60. "Seroxat: Emails from the edge", BBC News, undated.
  61. MHRA, 6 March 2008(a), p. 4, para. 8.
  62. "Paroxetine (Seroxat)—Variation Assessment Report—Proposal to contraindicate in adolescents and children under 18 years with major depressive disorder", Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, 4 June 2003, pp. 1–18 (hereinafter MHRA, 4 June 2003), p. 5.
  63. GlaxoSmithKline (20 May 2003). "Paroxetine, BRL–029060: Critical evaluation of paroxetine hydrochloride for the treatment of Paediatric Obsessive Compulsive Disorder and Social Anxiety Disorder in children and adolescents", in MHRA, 22 May 2003, Annex 1, pp. 1–79 (hereinafter GSK briefing paper)
  64. GSK briefing paper, 20 May 2003, p. 9, table 1.
  65. 1 2 MHRA, 22 May 2003. For twice that of placebo, section 5.2.5, p. 27. For the rest, section 5.4, p. 32.
  66. MHRA, 22 May 2003, section 5.2.5.3, p. 29.
  67. Joffre, Shelley (3 October 2004). "Taken on Trust", BBC Panorama.
  68. Carrey, Normand; Pharm, Adil Virani (November 2003). "Suicidal Ideation Reports From Pediatric Trials for Paroxetine and Venlafaxine", The Canadian Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Review, 12(4), pp. 101–102. PMID   19030150 PMC   2533826
  69. MHRA, 4 June 2003, p. 16.
  70. Duff, Gordon (10 June 2010). "Safety of Seroxat (paroxetine) in children and adolescents under 18 years—contradindication in the treatment of depressive illness", Committee on Safety of Medicines, Scottish Executive.
  71. MHRA, 6 March 2008(a), pp. 5–6, para. 16–17.
  72. McGoey and Jackson 2009, p. 108.
  73. 1 2 Jackson 2012, p. 109.
  74. MHRA, 6 March 2008(a), p. 7, para. 21.
  75. MHRA, 6 March 2008(a), p. 8, para. 28; p. 9, para 35.
  76. MHRA, 6 March 2008(a), p. 9, para. 36.
  77. MHRA, 6 March 2008(a), p. 9, para. 38.
  78. McGoey and Jackson 2009, p. 107.
  79. Bass, Alison; Howe, Peter J. (29 March 1996). "Probe of Brown mental health contract handed over to AG"], The Boston Globe.
  80. Bass 2008, p. vii.
  81. Bass, Alison (4 October 1999). "Drug companies enrich Brown professor" Archived 8 August 2017 at the Wayback Machine , The Boston Globe.
  82. Leddy, Chuck (5 July 2008). "The unhealthy ties that bind FDA to drug firms", The Boston Globe.
  83. Apter, Alan, et al. (22 March 2006). "Evaluation of Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors in Children and Adolescents Taking Paroxetine," Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology, 16(1–2), pp. 77–90. doi:10.1089/cap.2006.16.77 PMID   16553530 ;
  84. The People of the State of New York against GlaxoSmithKline, 2 June 2004, courtesy of FindLaw.
  85. Kagle, Abigail (undated). "Driven to Settle: Eliot Spitzer v. GlaxoSmithKline and Undisclosed Clinical Trials Data Regarding Paxil", University of Columbia Law School, p. 4.
  86. Kagle, p. 6.
  87. Kagle, pp. 7–8; Jackson 2012, p. 109; Gardiner Harris, "Maker of Paxil to Release All Trial Results", The New York Times, 27 August 2004.
  88. Goldacre, Ben (2013). Bad Pharma , London: Fourth Estate, first published 2012, p. 387.
  89. Kmietowicz, Zosia (7 February 2013). "GSK backs campaign for disclosure of trial data", BMJ, 346. doi:10.1136/bmj.f819 PMID   23393115
  90. Simon Neville, "GlaxoSmithKline fined $3bn after bribing doctors to increase drugs sales", The Guardian, 3 July 2012.
  91. Also see Letter from Jon Jureidini to Mina K. Dulcan, 26 December 2002, courtesy of Healthy Skepticism.
  92. Elizabeth Wager, et al., "Retraction guidelines", Committee on Publication Ethics, September 2009.
  93. Alison Bass, "Drug companies enrich Brown professor", The Boston Globe, 4 October 1999.
  94. McHenry, Leemon, Jureidini, Jon. (2008). "Industry-Sponsored Ghostwriting in Clinical Trial Reporting: A Case Study" Accountability in Research , 15, p. 160.
  95. 1 2 Peter Doshi, "Putting GlaxoSmithKline to the test over paroxetine," BMJ, 12 November 2013. doi : 10.1136/bmj.f6754 PMID   24222673
  96. Jureidini, Jon N. (13 June 2013). "Restoring invisible and abandoned trials: a call for people to publish the findings" (letter), BMJ, 13(346). doi : 10.1136/bmj.f2865
    Jon Jureidini–GSK correspondence, BMJ, 347, 12 November 2013.
    For RIAT, see Loder, Elizabeth, et al. (13 June 2013). "Restoring the integrity of the clinical trial evidence base", BMJ, 346. doi : 10.1136/bmj.f3601
  97. "Antidepressant Use in Children, Adolescents, and Adults", Food and Drug Administration, 2 May 2007, courtesy of the Drug Industry Documents Archive, University of California, San Francisco.
  98. "Medication guide Paxil", FDA, June 2014, courtesy of the Drug Industry Documents Archive, University of California, San Francisco.
  99. Hetrick, Sarah E.; McKenzie, Joanne E.; Cox, Georgina R., et al. (14 November 2012). "Newer generation antidepressants for depressive disorders in children and adolescents", Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004851.pub3 PMID   23152227

Further reading

Letters

Study 329
Paxil, June 2003.jpg
Paroxetine, sold as Paxil and Seroxat
Study typeEight-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized clinical trial comparing paroxetine with imipramine in adolescents with major depressive disorder
Dates1994–1998
Locations10 centres in the United States, two in Canada
Lead researcher Martin Keller, then professor of psychiatry, Brown University
FundingSmithKline Beecham, now GlaxoSmithKline (GSK)
Protocol "Study drug: BRL29060/Paroxetine (Paxil)", SmithKline Beecham, 20 August 1993, amended 24 March 1994.
PublishedJuly 2001
Disputed articleMartin B. Keller, et al. (July 2001). "Efficacy of paroxetine in the treatment of adolescent major depression: a randomized, controlled trial", Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40(7), pp. 762–772. PMID   11437014