Submarine-launched ballistic missile

Last updated

A UGM-96 Trident I clears the water after launch from a US Navy submarine in 1984. Trident missile launch.jpg
A UGM-96 Trident I clears the water after launch from a US Navy submarine in 1984.

A submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM) is a ballistic missile capable of being launched from submarines. Modern variants usually deliver multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRVs), each of which carries a nuclear warhead and allows a single launched missile to strike several targets. Submarine-launched ballistic missiles operate in a different way from submarine-launched cruise missiles.

Contents

Modern submarine-launched ballistic missiles are closely related to intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), with ranges of over 5,500 kilometres (3,000 nmi), and in many cases SLBMs and ICBMs may be part of the same family of weapons.

History

Origins

The first practical design of a submarine-based launch platform was developed by the Germans near the end of World War II involving a launch tube which contained a V-2 ballistic missile variant and was towed behind a submarine, known by the code-name Prüfstand XII. The war ended before it could be tested, but the engineers who had worked on it were taken to work for the United States (Operation Paperclip) and for the Soviet Union on their SLBM programs. These and other early SLBM systems required vessels to be surfaced when they fired missiles, but launch systems were adapted to allow underwater launching in the 1950-1960s. A converted Project 611 (Zulu-IV class) submarine launched the world's first SLBM, an R-11FM (SS-N-1 Scud-A, naval variant of the SS-1 Scud) on 16 September 1955. [1] Five additional Project V611 and AV611 (Zulu-V class) submarines became the world's first operational ballistic missile submarines (SSBs) with two R-11FM missiles each, entering service in 1956–57. [2]

The United States Navy initially worked on a sea-based variant of the US Army Jupiter intermediate-range ballistic missile, projecting four of the large, liquid-fueled missiles per submarine. [3] Rear Admiral W. F. "Red" Raborn headed a Special Project Office to develop Jupiter for the Navy, beginning in late 1955. [3] [4] However, at the Project Nobska submarine warfare conference in 1956, physicist Edward Teller stated that a physically small one-megaton warhead could be produced for the relatively small, solid-fueled Polaris missile, [5] and this prompted the Navy to leave the Jupiter program in December of that year. Soon Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Arleigh Burke concentrated all Navy strategic research on Polaris, still under Admiral Raborn's Special Project Office. [4] All US SLBMs have been solid-fueled while all Soviet and Russian SLBMs have been liquid-fueled except for the Russian RSM-56 Bulava, which entered service in 2014.

Polaris A-1 Polaris-a1.jpg
Polaris A-1

The world's first operational nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarine (SSBN) was USS George Washington (SSBN-598) with 16 Polaris A-1 missiles, which entered service in December 1959 and conducted the first SSBN deterrent patrol November 1960 – January 1961. [6] George Washington also conducted the first successful submerged SLBM launch with a Polaris A-1 on 20 July 1960. [7] Fifty-two days later, the Soviet Union made its first successful underwater launch of a submarine ballistic missile in the White Sea, on 10 September 1960 from the same converted Project 611 (NATO reporting name Zulu-IV class) submarine that first launched the R-11FM. [8] The Soviets were only a year behind the US with their first SSBN, the ill-fated K-19 of Project 658 (Hotel class), commissioned in November 1960. However, the Hotel class carried only three R-13 missiles (NATO reporting name SS-N-4) each and had to surface and raise the missile to launch. [9] Submerged launch was not an operational capability for the Soviets until 1963, when the R-21 missile (SS-N-5) was first backfitted to Project 658 (Hotel class) and Project 629 (Golf class) submarines. [10] The Soviet Union was able to beat the U.S. in launching and testing the first SLBM with a live nuclear warhead, an R-13 that detonated in the Novaya Zemlya Test Range in the Arctic Ocean, doing so on 20 October 1961, [11] just ten days before the gigantic 50 Mt Tsar Bomba's detonation in the same general area. The United States eventually conducted a similar test in the Pacific Ocean on 6 May 1962, with a Polaris A-2 launched from USS Ethan Allen (SSBN-608) as part of the nuclear test series Operation Dominic. The first Soviet SSBN with 16 missiles was the Project 667A (Yankee class), which first entered service in 1967 with 32 boats completed by 1974. [12] [13] By the time the first Yankee was commissioned the US had built 41 SSBNs, nicknamed the "41 for Freedom". [14] [15]

French M45 SLBM and M51 SLBM in cross-section of a submarine. Snle-snle-ng-svg.svg
French M45 SLBM and M51 SLBM in cross-section of a submarine.

Deployment and further development

The short range of the early SLBMs dictated basing and deployment locations. By the late 1960s the Polaris A-3 was deployed on all US SSBNs with a range of 4,600 kilometres (2,500 nmi), a great improvement on the 1,900 kilometres (1,000 nmi) range of Polaris A-1. The A-3 also had three warheads that landed in a pattern around a single target. [16] [17] The Yankee class was initially equipped with the R-27 Zyb missile (SS-N-6) with a range of 2,400 kilometres (1,300 nmi). The US was much more fortunate in its basing arrangements than the Soviets. Thanks to NATO and the US possession of Guam, US SSBNs were permanently forward deployed at Advanced Refit Sites in Holy Loch, Scotland, Rota, Spain, and Guam by the middle 1960s, resulting in short transit times to patrol areas near the Soviet Union. The SSBN facilities at the Advanced Refit Sites were austere, with only a submarine tender and floating dry dock. Converted merchant ships designated T-AKs (Military Sealift Command cargo ships) were provided to ferry missiles and supplies to the sites. With two rotating crews per boat, about one-third of the total US force could be in a patrol area at any time. The Soviet bases, in Severomorsk (near Murmansk) for the Arctic-Atlantic theater in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky for the Pacific theater, required their SSBNs to make a long transit (e.g., through NATO-monitored waters in the Atlantic) to their mid-ocean patrol areas to hold the continental United States (CONUS) at risk. This resulted in only a small percentage of the Soviet force occupying patrol areas at any time, and was a great motivation for longer-range Soviet SLBMs, which would allow them to patrol close to their bases, in areas sometimes referred to as "deep bastions". These missiles were the R-29 Vysota series (SS-N-8, SS-N-18, SS-N-23), equipped on Projects 667B, 667BD, 667BDR, and 667BDRM (Delta-I through Delta-IV classes). [10] The SS-N-8, with a range of 7,700 kilometres (4,200 nmi), entered service on the first Delta-I boat in 1972, before the Yankee class was even completed. A total of 43 Delta-class boats of all types entered service 1972–90, with the SS-N-18 on the Delta III class and the R-29RM Shtil (SS-N-23) on the Delta IV class. [18] [19] [20] [21] The new missiles had increased range and eventually multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRV), multiple warheads that could each hit a different target. [10]

Poseidon and Trident I

Although the US did not commission any new SSBNs from 1967 through 1981, it did introduce two new SLBMs. Thirty-one of the 41 original US SSBNs were built with larger diameter launch tubes with future missiles in mind. In the early 1970s the Poseidon (C-3) missile entered service, and those 31 SSBNs were backfitted with it. [22] Poseidon offered a massive MIRV capability of up to 14 warheads per missile. [15] Like the Soviets, the US also desired a longer-range missile that would allow SSBNs to be based in CONUS. In the late 1970s the Trident I (C-4) missile with a range of 7,400 kilometres (4,000 nmi) and eight MIRV warheads was backfitted to 12 of the Poseidon-equipped submarines. [23] [24] [25] The SSBN facilities (primarily a submarine tender and floating dry dock) of the base at Rota, Spain were disestablished and the Naval Submarine Base King's Bay in Georgia was built for the Trident I-equipped force.[ citation needed ]

Trident and Typhoon submarines

A Trident II missile just after launch. Trident II missile cropped.jpg
A Trident II missile just after launch.

Both the United States and the Soviet Union commissioned larger SSBNs designed for new missiles in 1981. The American large SSBN was the Ohio class, also called the "Trident submarine", with the largest SSBN armament ever of 24 missiles, initially Trident I but built with much larger tubes for the Trident II (D-5) missile, which entered service in 1990. [26] [27] The entire class was converted to use Trident II by the early 2000s. Trident II offered a range of over 8,000 kilometres (4,300 nmi) with eight larger MIRV warheads than Trident I. When the USS Ohio (SSBN-726) commenced sea trials in 1980, two of the first ten US SSBNs had their missiles removed to comply with SALT treaty requirements; the remaining eight were converted to attack submarines (SSN) by the end of 1982. These were all in the Pacific, and the Guam SSBN base was disestablished; the first several Ohio-class boats used new Trident facilities at Naval Submarine Base Bangor, Washington. Eighteen Ohio-class boats were commissioned by 1997, [28] four of which were converted as cruise missile submarines (SSGN) in the 2000s to comply with START I treaty requirements. The Soviet large SSBN was the Project 941 Akula, famous as the Typhoon-class (and not to be confused with the Project 971 Shchuka attack submarine, called "Akula" by NATO). The Typhoons were the largest submarines ever built at 48,000 tons submerged. They were armed with 20 of the new R-39 Rif (SS-N-20) missiles with a range of 8,300 kilometres (4,500 nmi) and 10 MIRV warheads. Six Typhoons were commissioned in 1981–89. [29]

Post-Cold War

New SSBN construction terminated for over 10 years in Russia and slowed in the US with the collapse of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War in 1991. The US rapidly decommissioned its remaining 31 older SSBNs, with a few converted to other roles, and the base at Holy Loch was disestablished. Most of the former Soviet SSBN force was gradually scrapped under the provisions of the Nunn–Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction agreement through 2012. [30] By that time the Russian SSBN force stood at six Delta-IVs, three Delta-IIIs, and a lone Typhoon used as a testbed for new missiles (the R-39s unique to the Typhoons were reportedly scrapped in 2012). Upgraded missiles such as the R-29RMU Sineva (SS-N-23 Sineva) were developed for the Deltas. In 2013 the Russians commissioned the first Borei-class submarine, also called the Dolgorukiy class after the lead vessel. By 2015 two others had entered service. This class is intended to replace the aging Deltas, and carries 16 solid-fuel RSM-56 Bulava missiles, with a reported range of 10,000 kilometres (5,400 nmi) and six MIRV warheads. The US is building a replacement for the Ohio class; however, the first of the class wasn't laid down until October 2020.

Ballistic missile submarines have been of great strategic importance for the United States, Russia, and other nuclear powers since they entered service in the Cold War, as they can hide from reconnaissance satellites and fire their nuclear weapons with virtual impunity. This makes them immune to a first strike directed against nuclear forces, allowing each side to maintain the capability to launch a devastating retaliatory strike, even if all land-based missiles have been destroyed. This relieves each side of the necessity to adopt a launch on warning posture, with its attendant risk of accidental nuclear war. Additionally, the deployment of highly accurate missiles on ultra-quiet submarines allows an attacker to sneak up close to the enemy coast and launch a missile on a depressed trajectory (a non-optimal ballistic trajectory which trades off reduced throw-weight for a faster and lower path, effectively reducing the time between launch and impact), thus opening the possibility of a decapitation strike.[ citation needed ]

Types

Montage of the launch of a Trident I C-4 SLBM and the paths of its reentry vehicles Trident C-4 montage.jpg
Montage of the launch of a Trident I C-4 SLBM and the paths of its reentry vehicles
Selected U.S. SLBMs. L to R: Polaris A1, Polaris A2, Polaris A3, Poseidon, Trident I and Trident II Weapons of the Fleet Ballistic Missile Submarine Fleet.jpg
Selected U.S. SLBMs. L to R: Polaris A1, Polaris A2, Polaris A3, Poseidon, Trident I and Trident II
Selected Russian and Chinese SLBMs. L to R: R-29 Vysota (SS-N-8), R-29R (SS-N-18), R-39 (SS-N-20), R-29RM (SS-N-23), JL-1, JL-2 SLBM Comparison.jpg
Selected Russian and Chinese SLBMs. L to R: R-29 Vysota (SS-N-8), R-29R (SS-N-18), R-39 (SS-N-20), R-29RM (SS-N-23), JL-1, JL-2

Specific types of SLBMs (current, past and under development) include:

K-15 Sagarika SLBM Sagarika B05 SLBM launch.jpg
K-15 Sagarika SLBM
TypeNATO NameMinimum Range (km)Maximum Range (km)CountryStatus
UGM-27 Polaris (A-1 through A-3) 4,600Flag of the United States.svg United States Decommissioned
UGM-73 Poseidon (C-3) 4,600Decommissioned
UGM-96 Trident I (C-4) 7,400Decommissioned
UGM-133 Trident II (D5LE) 12,000Operational
R-13 SS-N-4600Flag of the Soviet Union.svg Soviet Union Decommissioned
R-21 SS-N-51,650Flag of the Soviet Union.svg Soviet Union Decommissioned
R-27 Zyb SS-N-62,4003,000Flag of the Soviet Union.svg Soviet Union Decommissioned
R-29 "Vysota"/RSM-40 [31] SS-N-8 "Sawfly"7,7009,000Flag of the Soviet Union.svg Soviet Union Decommissioned
R-27KSS-NX-133,600Flag of Russia.svg Soviet Union/Russia Never operational [32]
RSM-45 R-31 SS-N-17 "Snipe" [31] 4,500Flag of Russia.svg Soviet Union/Russia Decommissioned
RSM-50 [31] R-29R "Vysota" SS-N-18 "Stingray"6,500Flag of Russia.svg Soviet Union/Russia Decommissioned
RSM-52 [31] R-39 "Rif" SS-N-20 "Sturgeon"8,300Flag of Russia.svg Soviet Union/Russia Decommissioned
R-29RM "Shtil"/RSM-54 SS-N-23 "Skiff"8,300Flag of Russia.svg Soviet Union/Russia Decommissioned (Under rebuild to R-29RMU "Sineva") [33]
RSM-54 R-29RMU "Sineva" SS-N-23 "Skiff"8,300Flag of Russia.svg Soviet Union/Russia Operational
RSM-54 R-29RMU2 "Layner" 8,30012,000Flag of Russia.svg Soviet Union/Russia Operational
RSM-56 R-30 "Bulava" SS-NX-32 [34] 8,3009,300Flag of Russia.svg Soviet Union/Russia Operational
UGM-27 Polaris (A-3) and Chevaline 4,600Flag of the United Kingdom.svg United Kingdom Decommissioned
UGM-133 Trident II (D5) 12,000Flag of the United Kingdom.svg United Kingdom Operational
M1 3,000Flag of France.svg France Decommissioned
M2 3,200Flag of France.svg France Decommissioned
M20 3,000Flag of France.svg France Decommissioned
M4 5,000Flag of France.svg France Decommissioned
M45 6,000Flag of France.svg France Decommissioned
M51 8,00010,000Flag of France.svg France Operational
JL-1 [35] 2,500Flag of China.svg China Decommissioned (never fully operational)
JL-2 7,4008,000Flag of China.svg China Operational
JL-3 12,000Flag of China.svg China Operational [36]
K-15/B-05 Sagarika 7501,900Flag of India.svg India Operational
K-4 4,000Flag of India.svg India Operational
K-5 5,000Flag of India.svg India Under development [37] [38]
K-6 8,00012,000Flag of India.svg India Under development [39] [40]
Pukguksong-1(KN-11)5002,500Flag of North Korea.svg North Korea Operational [41]
Variant Pukguksong-1Flag of North Korea.svg North Korea Being tested [42]
Pukguksong-3(KN-26)≥2000 [43] Flag of North Korea.svg North Korea Being tested [44]
Pukguksong-4ㅅ [43] Flag of North Korea.svg North Korea Dubious, neither model appears real as both models lack a separation shroud and the Pukguksong-4 was escorted by the KPA Ground Force. [45]
Pukguksong-5ㅅ≥3000Flag of North Korea.svg North Korea
Hyunmoo IV-4500Flag of South Korea.svg South Korea Operational [46]
Hyper Velocity Gliding Projectile 3000 [47] Flag of Japan.svg Japan Under development [48]

Non-military use

Some former Russian SLBMs have been converted into Volna and Shtil' launch vehicles to launch satellites – either from a submarine or from a launch site on land.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Intercontinental ballistic missile</span> Ballistic missile with a range of more than 5,500 kilometres

An intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) is a ballistic missile with a range greater than 5,500 kilometres (3,400 mi), primarily designed for nuclear weapons delivery. Conventional, chemical, and biological weapons can also be delivered with varying effectiveness, but have never been deployed on ICBMs. Most modern designs support multiple independently targetable reentry vehicle (MIRVs), allowing a single missile to carry several warheads, each of which can strike a different target. The United States, Russia, China, France, India, the United Kingdom, Israel, and North Korea are the only countries known to have operational ICBMs. Incidentally, Pakistan is the only nuclear-armed state that does not possess ICBMs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">UGM-27 Polaris</span> Submarine-launched ballistic missile

The UGM-27 Polaris missile was a two-stage solid-fueled nuclear-armed submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM). As the United States Navy's first SLBM, it served from 1961 to 1980.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">UGM-73 Poseidon</span> Strategic SLBM

The UGM-73 Poseidon missile was the second US Navy nuclear-armed submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM) system, powered by a two-stage solid-fuel rocket. It succeeded the UGM-27 Polaris beginning in 1972, bringing major advances in warheads and accuracy. It was followed by Trident I in 1979, and Trident II in 1990.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">First strike (nuclear strategy)</span> Preemptive attack using nuclear weapons

In nuclear strategy, a first strike or preemptive strike is a preemptive surprise attack employing overwhelming force. First strike capability is a country's ability to defeat another nuclear power by destroying its arsenal to the point where the attacking country can survive the weakened retaliation while the opposing side is left unable to continue war. The preferred methodology is to attack the opponent's strategic nuclear weapon facilities, command and control sites, and storage depots first. The strategy is called counterforce.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Multiple independently targetable reentry vehicle</span> Ballistic missile payload containing multiple warheads which are independently targetable

A multiple independently targetable reentry vehicle (MIRV) is an exoatmospheric ballistic missile payload containing several warheads, each capable of being aimed to hit a different target. The concept is almost invariably associated with intercontinental ballistic missiles carrying thermonuclear warheads, even if not strictly being limited to them. An intermediate case is the multiple reentry vehicle (MRV) missile which carries several warheads which are dispersed but not individually aimed. All nuclear-weapon states except Pakistan and North Korea are currently confirmed to have deployed MIRV missile systems. Israel is suspected to possess or be in the process of developing MIRVs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chevaline</span> British nuclear missile decoy and penetration aid system

Chevaline was a system to improve the penetrability of the warheads used by the British Polaris nuclear weapons system. Devised as an answer to the improved Soviet anti-ballistic missile defences around Moscow, the system increased the probability that at least one warhead would penetrate Moscow's anti-ballistic missile (ABM) defences, something which the Royal Navy's earlier UGM-27 Polaris re-entry vehicles (RVs) were thought to be unlikely to do.

A ballistic missile submarine is a submarine capable of deploying submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs) with nuclear warheads. These submarines became a major weapon system in the Cold War because of their nuclear deterrence capability. They can fire missiles thousands of kilometers from their targets, and acoustic quieting makes them difficult to detect, thus making them a survivable deterrent in the event of a first strike and a key element of the mutual assured destruction policy of nuclear deterrence. The deployment of ballistic missile submarines is dominated by the United States and Russia. Smaller numbers are in service with France, the United Kingdom, China and India; North Korea is also suspected to have an experimental submarine that is diesel-electric powered.

<i>George Washington</i>-class submarine United States Navy class of fleet ballistic missile submarines

The George Washington class was a class of nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines deployed by the United States Navy. George Washington, along with the later Ethan Allen, Lafayette, James Madison, and Benjamin Franklin classes, comprised the "41 for Freedom" group of submarines that represented the Navy's main contribution to the nuclear deterrent force through the late 1980s.

Yankee-class submarine Soviet ballistic missile submarine class

The Yankee class, Soviet designations Project 667A Navaga (navaga) and Project 667AU Nalim (burbot) for the basic Yankee-I, were a family of nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines built in the Soviet Union for the Soviet Navy. In total, 34 units were built: 24 in Severodvinsk for the Northern Fleet and the remaining 10 in Komsomolsk-on-Amur for the Pacific Fleet. Two Northern Fleet units were later transferred to the Pacific.

<i>Lafayette</i>-class submarine United States Navy class of fleet ballistic missile submarines

The Lafayette class of submarine was an evolutionary development from the Ethan Allen class of fleet ballistic missile submarine, slightly larger and generally improved. This class, together with the George Washington, Ethan Allen, James Madison, and Benjamin Franklin classes, composed the "41 for Freedom," the Navy's primary contribution to the nuclear deterrent force through the late 1980s. The James Madison and Benjamin Franklin classes are combined with the Lafayettes in some references.

<i>James Madison</i>-class submarine United States Navy class of fleet ballistic missile submarines

The James Madison class of submarine was an evolutionary development from the Lafayette class of fleet ballistic missile submarine. They were identical to the Lafayettes except for being initially designed to carry the Polaris A-3 missile instead of the earlier A-2. This class, together with the George Washington, Ethan Allen, Lafayette, and Benjamin Franklin classes, composed the "41 for Freedom" that was the Navy's primary contribution to the nuclear deterrent force through the late 1980s. This class and the Benjamin Franklin class are combined with the Lafayettes in some references.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">M45 (missile)</span> Submarine-launched ballistic missile

The M45 SLBM was a French Navy submarine-launched ballistic missile Forty-eight M45 were in commission in the Force océanique stratégique, the submarine nuclear deterrent component of the French Navy. The missiles, derived from the M4, were produced by Aérospatiale. Initially, an ICBM land-based version was considered, but these plans were discarded in 1996 to favour an all-naval deployment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">UGM-133 Trident II</span> US/UK SLBM

The UGM-133A Trident II, or Trident D5 is a submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM), built by Lockheed Martin Space in Sunnyvale, California, and deployed with the United States and Royal Navy. It was first deployed in March 1990, and remains in service. The Trident II Strategic Weapons System is an improved SLBM with greater accuracy, payload, and range than the earlier Trident C-4. It is a key element of the U.S. strategic nuclear triad and strengthens U.S. strategic deterrence. The Trident II is considered to be a durable sea-based system capable of engaging many targets. It has payload flexibility that can accommodate various treaty requirements, such as New START. The Trident II's increased payload allows nuclear deterrence to be accomplished with fewer submarines, and its high accuracy—approaching that of land-based missiles—enables it to be used as a first strike weapon.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Submarine-launched cruise missile</span> Seaborne weapon

A submarine-launched cruise missile (SLCM) is a cruise missile that is launched from a submarine. Current versions are typically standoff weapons known as land-attack cruise missiles (LACMs), which are used to attack predetermined land targets with conventional or nuclear payloads. Anti-ship cruise missiles (ASCMs) are also used, and some submarine-launched cruise missiles have variants for both functions.

The M51 SLBM is a French submarine-launched ballistic missile, built by ArianeGroup, and deployed with the French Navy. Designed to replace the M45 SLBM, it was first deployed in 2010.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear weapons delivery</span> Type of explosive arms

Nuclear weapons delivery is the technology and systems used to place a nuclear weapon at the position of detonation, on or near its target. Several methods have been developed to carry out this task.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear triad</span> Set of three types of nuclear-strike weapons

A nuclear triad is a three-pronged military force structure of land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs), and strategic bombers with nuclear bombs and missiles. Countries build nuclear triads to eliminate an enemy's ability to destroy a nation's nuclear forces in a first-strike attack, which preserves their own ability to launch a second strike and therefore increases their nuclear deterrence.

In nuclear strategy, a counterforce target is one that has a military value, such as a launch silo for intercontinental ballistic missiles, an airbase at which nuclear-armed bombers are stationed, a homeport for ballistic missile submarines, or a command and control installation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">STRAT-X</span> U.S. government-sponsored study

STRAT-X, or Strategic-Experimental, was a U.S. government-sponsored study conducted during 1966 and 1967 that comprehensively analyzed the potential future of the U.S. nuclear deterrent force. At the time, the Soviet Union was making significant strides in nuclear weapons delivery, and also constructing anti-ballistic missile defenses to protect strategic facilities. To address a potential technological gap between the two superpowers, U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara entrusted the classified STRAT-X study to the Institute for Defense Analyses, which compiled a twenty-volume report in nine months. The report looked into more than one hundred different weapons systems, ultimately resulting in the MGM-134 Midgetman and LGM-118 Peacekeeper intercontinental ballistic missiles, the Ohio-class submarines, and the Trident submarine-launched ballistic missiles, among others. Journalists have regarded STRAT-X as a major influence on the course of U.S. nuclear policy.

References

  1. ↑ Wade, Mark. "R-11". Encyclopedia Astronautica. Archived from the original on 9 March 2002. Retrieved 23 April 2011.
  2. ↑ "Large submarines – Project 611". russianships.info.
  3. 1 2 Friedman, pp. 192–195
  4. 1 2 "History of the Jupiter Missile System". heroicrelics.org.
  5. ↑ Teller, Edward (2001). Memoirs: A Twentieth Century Journey in Science and Politics . Cambridge, Massachusetts: Perseus Publishing. pp.  420–421. ISBN   0-7382-0532-X.
  6. ↑ Friedman, p. 196
  7. ↑ "Missiles 1963", Flight International : 752, 7 November 1963
  8. ↑ Dygalo, V.A. (December 1999). "Start razreshaju (in Russian)". Nauka i Zhizn' . Retrieved 23 April 2011.
  9. ↑ "Nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines – Project 658". russianships.info.
  10. 1 2 3 Gardiner and Chumbley, pp. 355–357
  11. ↑ Polmar, Norman; White, Michael (2010). Project Azorian: The CIA and the Raising of the K-129. Naval Institute Press. p. 21. ISBN   978-1-59114-690-2.
  12. ↑ Gardiner and Chumbley, p. 403
  13. ↑ "Nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines – Project 667A". russianships.info.
  14. ↑ Gardiner and Chumbley, pp. 610–613
  15. 1 2 Polmar American Submarine, p. 133
  16. ↑ Friedman, pp. 199–200
  17. ↑ Polmar American Submarine, pp. 131–133
  18. ↑ "Nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines – Project 667B". russianships.info.
  19. ↑ "Nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines – Project 667BD". russianships.info.
  20. ↑ "Nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines – Project 667BDR". russianships.info.
  21. ↑ "Nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines – Project 667BDRM". russianships.info.
  22. ↑ Friedman, p. 201
  23. ↑ Gardiner and Chumbley, pp. 553–554
  24. ↑ Friedman, p. 206
  25. ↑ Polmar American Submarine, pp. 133–135
  26. ↑ Friedman, pp. 206–207
  27. ↑ Gardiner and Chumbley, p. 554
  28. ↑ Gardiner and Chumbley, p. 613
  29. ↑ "Nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines – Project 941". russianships.info.
  30. ↑ "DTRA verification page". Archived from the original on 5 September 2015. Retrieved 17 April 2015.
  31. 1 2 3 4 Korabli VMF SSSR, Vol. 1, Part 1, Yu. Apalkov, Sankt Peterburg, 2003, ISBN   5-8172-0069-4
  32. ↑ SS-NX-13 SLBM System (U), Defense Intelligence Agency, D5T-1020S-4l7-75, 1 October 1975
  33. ↑ "SSBN K-51 Verkhoturye arrived to Zvezdochka for repairs today". Rusnavy.com. 23 August 2010. Retrieved 8 October 2010.
  34. ↑ NASIC-1031-0985-09
  35. ↑ "JL-1 [CSS-N-3] – China Nuclear Forces". Fas.org. Retrieved 10 February 2012.
  36. ↑ "2023 Military and Security Developments Involving the People's Republic of China" (PDF). US Department of Defense. Retrieved 22 November 2023.
  37. ↑ "Going nuclear at sea". The Indian Express. 19 March 2015. Retrieved 11 January 2017.
  38. ↑ "India's First Ballistic Missile Sub to Begin Sea Trials". The Diplomat. 30 July 2013. Retrieved 11 January 2017.
  39. ↑ "India's Undersea Deterrent".
  40. ↑ "From India Today magazine: A peek into India's top secret and costliest defence project, nuclear submarines".
  41. ↑ (2nd LD) N.K. leader calls SLBM launch success, boasts of nuke attack capacity – Yonhap, 25 August 2016 08:17 am
  42. ↑ "PS-1 mod". b14643.de. Retrieved 21 October 2021.
  43. 1 2 오석민 (15 October 2020). "N. Korea's new SLBM labeled 'Pukguksong-4ㅅ,' not 'Pukguksong-4A: Navy chief". Yonhap News Agency. Retrieved 15 December 2020.
  44. ↑ "Pukguksong-3 (KN-26)". Missile Threat. Retrieved 15 December 2020.
  45. ↑ "Pukguksong-4 and -5". b14643.de. Retrieved 21 October 2021.
  46. ↑ Lee Min-ji (12 June 2024). "(Yonhap Feature) S. Korean SLBM-capable sub on covert underwater duty against N. Korean threats". Yonhap News Agency. Archived from the original on 12 June 2024. Retrieved 12 June 2024.
  47. ↑ "敵基地攻撃の長射程ミサイル、「5年後」「10年後」と段階的に配備：朝日新聞デジタル". 27 December 2022. Archived from the original on 27 December 2022.
  48. ↑ "「反撃能力」保有へ、長射程ミサイル同時開発を検討…極超音速など１０種類以上". December 2022.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.