Russia and weapons of mass destruction

Last updated

Russian Federation
(originally the Soviet Union)
Russian Federation (orthographic projection) - All Territorial Disputes.svg
Nuclear program start date1943 [1]
First nuclear weapon testAugust 29, 1949
First thermonuclear weapon testNovember 22, 1955
Last nuclear testOctober 24, 1990
Largest yield test50  Mt (210  PJ)
(Tsar Bomba)
Total tests715 detonations
Peak stockpile46,000 warheads (1975)
45,000 warheads (1990)
Current stockpile5,580 [2] (2024)
Current strategic arsenal1,710 [3] (2024)
Maximum missile range18,000 km [4]
NPT partyYes (1968, one of five recognized powers)

The Russian Federation is known to possess or have possessed three types of weapons of mass destruction: nuclear weapons, biological weapons, and chemical weapons. It is one of the five nuclear-weapon states recognized under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.

Contents

Russia possesses a total of 5,580 nuclear warheads as of 2024, [5] the largest confirmed stockpile of nuclear warheads in the world. Russia's deployed missiles (those actually ready to be launched) number about 1,710, also the largest confirmed strategically deployed arsenal in the world as of 2024. [6] [7] The remaining weapons are either in reserve stockpiles, or have been retired and are slated for dismantling. Russia's predecessor state, the Soviet Union, reached a peak stockpile of about 45,000 nuclear warheads in 1986. [8] The number of weapons Russia may possess is currently controlled by the bilateral New START treaty with the United States.

The Soviet Union ratified the Geneva Protocol—prohibiting the use of biological and chemical weapons in interstate conflicts—on April 5, 1928, with reservations that were later dropped on January 18, 2001. [9] Russia is also party to the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention and the 1993 Chemical Weapons Convention. [10] [11] The Soviet biological weapons program violated the Biological Weapons Convention and was the world's largest, longest, and most sophisticated program of its kind. [12] At its peak, the program employed up to 65,000 people. [12]

Despite being a signatory to the Chemical Weapons Convention, Russia has continued to hold and occasionally use chemical weapons. In 1997, Russia declared an arsenal of 39,967 tons of chemical weapons, which it worked in part to decrease. [13] [14] Its stock of weapons was officially declared destroyed in 2017. The poisoning of Sergei and Yulia Skripal in 2018 and the poisoning of Alexei Navalny in 2020, both carried out by Russia, revealed that the country maintained an illicit chemical weapons program. [15]

Nuclear weapons

History

Soviet era

Post-Soviet era

At the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, Soviet nuclear weapons were deployed in four of the new republics: Russia, Ukraine, Belarus and Kazakhstan. In May 1992, these four states signed the Lisbon Protocol, agreeing to join the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, with Russia the successor state to the Soviet Union as a nuclear state, and the other three states joining as non-nuclear states.

Ukraine agreed to give up its weapons to Russia, in exchange for guarantees of Ukrainian territory from Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States, known as the Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances. China and France also made statements in support of the memorandum. [16]

Arms reduction

The threat of nuclear warfare was a persistent and terrifying threat during the Cold War. At its height, the Soviet Union and United States each mustered tens of thousands of warheads, under the doctrine of mutual assured destruction. By the 1980s, both the United States and Soviet Union sought to reduce the number of weapons the other was fielding. This led to the opening of arms reduction talks in 1982. [17]

This culminated in the signing of the START I treaty in 1991: the first nuclear arms reduction treaty between the two global powers. This first treaty limited the number of deployed warheads in each nation to 6,000, nearly halving the prior 10,000 to 12,000 being fielded in 1991. [17] The considerable success of START I, combined with the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, led to the START II treaty. Russia never ratified the treaty, and it did not go into effect. An attempted START III was attempted but could not get past negotiations. [18]

Instead, the Strategic Offensive Reductions Treaty was passed in 2002, capping warheads at 2,200. [19] The current limitations stem from the New START treaty, ratified in 2010. It limits each side to 1,550 weapons. Nuclear bombers only count as one weapon each, even though they may carry up to 20, so the actual limit on the countries is slightly higher. The treaty is in force through to 2026. [20]

After U.S. President George W. Bush withdrew from the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, Russia responded by building-up their nuclear capabilities, in such a way as to counterbalance U.S. capabilities. [21] Russia decided not to sign the UN treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, which was adopted on 7 July 2017 by 122 States. [22] Most analysts agree that Russia's nuclear strategy under Putin eventually brought it into violation of the 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (although this is not confirmed). [23]

According to Russian officials, the American decision to deploy the missile defense system in Europe was a violation of the treaty. [24] U.S. President Donald Trump announced on 20 October 2018 that the U.S. would no longer consider itself bound by the treaty's provisions, raising nuclear tensions between the two powers. [25]

On November 2, 2023, Putin signed a law that withdraws Russia's ratification of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty. [26]

Nuclear arsenal of Russia

The exact number of nuclear warheads is a state secret and is therefore a matter of guesswork. As of 2024, the Federation of American Scientists estimates that Russia possesses 5,580 nuclear weapons, while the United States has 5,428; Russia and the U.S. each have about 1,600 active deployed strategic nuclear warheads. Russia's stockpile is growing in size, while the United States' is shrinking. [6] Russia has six nuclear missile fields in Kozelsk, Tatishchevo, Uzhur, Dombarovsky, Kartalay, and Aleysk; nuclear missile submarines patrolling from three naval bases at Nerpich'ya, Yagel'Naya, and Rybachiy; and nuclear bombers at Ukrainka and Engels air bases. [27] As of 2024, Russia operates 12 nuclear-powered, nuclear-armed ballistic missile submarines, comprising five Delta-class and seven Borei-class vessels. [28]

The RS-28 Sarmat [29] (Russian: РС-28 Сармат; NATO reporting name: SATAN 2), is a Russian liquid-fueled, MIRV-equipped, super-heavy thermonuclear armed intercontinental ballistic missile in development by the Makeyev Rocket Design Bureau [29] since 2009, [30] intended to replace the previous R-36 missile. Its large payload would allow for up to 10 heavy warheads or 15 lighter ones, [31] or a combination of warheads and massive amounts of countermeasures designed to defeat anti-missile systems. [32] [33] It was heralded by the Russian military as a response to the U.S. Prompt Global Strike. [34]

In 2015, information emerged that Russia may be developing a new nuclear torpedo, the Status-6 Ocean Multipurpose System, [35] [36] [37] codenamed "Kanyon" by Pentagon officials. [38] [39] This weapon is designed to create a tsunami wave up to 500m tall that will radioactively contaminate a wide area on an enemy coasts with cobalt-60, and to be immune to anti-missile defense systems such as laser weapons and railguns that might disable an ICBM. [36] [37] [39] [40] [41] Two potential carrier submarines, the Project 09852 Belgorod , and the Project 09851 Khabarovsk , are new boats laid down in 2012 and 2014 respectively. [38] [39] [42]

Status 6 appears to be a deterrent weapon of last resort. [41] [42] It appears to be a torpedo-shaped robotic mini-submarine, that can travel at speeds of 185 km/h (100 kn). [41] [42] [43] More recent information suggests a top speed of 100 km/h (54 kn), with a range of 10,000 km (6,200 mi) and a depth maximum of 1,000 m (3,300 ft). [44] This underwater drone is cloaked by stealth technology to elude acoustic tracking devices. [36] [42]

During an annual state-of-the-nation address given on March 1, 2018, President Vladimir Putin publicly claimed that Russia was now in possession of several new classes of nuclear weapons, including some with capabilities previously speculated to exist. Putin discussed several new or upgraded weapons, including a hypersonic glide vehicle known as the Avangard, capable of performing sharp maneuvers while traveling at 20 times the speed of sound making it "absolutely invulnerable for any missile defense system." [45]

Putin discussed the existence of a nuclear powered underwater torpedo and a nuclear powered cruise missile (9M730 Burevestnik), both with effectively unlimited range. He discussed that Russia had tested a new class of traditional ICBM called the RS-28 Sarmat, which expanded upon the range and carrying capability of the Soviet-era Satan ICBM. Animations of these weapons were shown in front of the live and televised audience. Putin suggested that an online poll be conducted to give them official public names. [46]

Nuclear weapons in Russian military doctrine

According to a Russian military doctrine stated in 2010, nuclear weapons could be used by Russia "in response to the use of nuclear and other types of weapons of mass destruction against it or its allies, and also in case of aggression against Russia with the use of conventional weapons when the very existence of the state is threatened". [47] [48] [49] Most military analysts believe that, in this case, Russia would pursue an 'escalate to de-escalate' strategy, initiating limited nuclear exchange to bring adversaries to the negotiating table. Russia will also threaten nuclear conflict to discourage initial escalation of any major conventional conflict. [50]

Nuclear proliferation

Nations with large nuclear stockpiles with global range (dark blue) World nuclear weapons.svg
Nations with large nuclear stockpiles with global range (dark blue)

After the Korean War, the Soviet Union transferred nuclear technology and weapons to the People's Republic of China as an adversary of the United States and NATO. According to Ion Mihai Pacepa, "Khrushchev's nuclear-proliferation process started with Communist China in April 1955, when the new ruler in the Kremlin consented to supply Beijing a sample atomic bomb and to help with its mass production. Subsequently, the Soviet Union built all the essentials of China's new military nuclear industry." [51]

Russia is one of the five "Nuclear Weapons States" (NWS) under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), which Russia ratified (as the Soviet Union) in 1968.

Following the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, a number of Soviet-era nuclear warheads remained on the territories of Belarus, Ukraine, and Kazakhstan. Under the terms of the Lisbon Protocol to the NPT, and following the 1995 Trilateral Agreement between Russia, Belarus, and the US, these were transferred to Russia, leaving Russia as the sole inheritor of the Soviet nuclear arsenal. It is estimated that the Soviet Union had approximately 45,000 nuclear weapons stockpiled at the time of its collapse, according to Victor Mikhailov, head of Federal Agency on Atomic Energy (Russia). [52]

The collapse of the Soviet Union allowed for a warming of relations with NATO. Fears of a nuclear holocaust lessened. In September 1997, the former secretary of the Russian Security Council Alexander Lebed claimed 100 "suitcase sized" nuclear weapons were unaccounted for. He said he was attempting to inventory the weapons when he was fired by President Boris Yeltsin in October 1996. [53] Indeed, several US politicians have expressed worries and promised legislation addressing the threat. [54]

Dmitry Medvedev with Barack Obama after signing the New START treaty in Prague, 2010 Obama and Medvedev sign Prague Treaty 2010.jpeg
Dmitry Medvedev with Barack Obama after signing the New START treaty in Prague, 2010

There were allegations that Russia contributed to the North Korean nuclear program, selling it the equipment for the safe storage and transportation of nuclear materials. [55] Nevertheless, Russia has condemned North Korean nuclear tests since then. [56] The Russian Federation has also wider commercial interests in selling the nuclear technology to India and Iran, reaching understanding memorandums in training their technicians in their respected nuclear programs. Russia is allegedly making efforts to build its influential hold in Africa for earning several billions of pounds by selling nuclear technology to developing African countries. [57]

Nuclear sabotage allegations

The highest-ranking GRU defector Stanislav Lunev described alleged Soviet plans for using tactical nuclear weapons for sabotage against the United States in the event of war. He described Soviet-made suitcase nukes identified as RA-115s (or RA-115-01s for submersible weapons) which weigh 50–60 pounds (23–27 kg). These portable bombs can last for many years if wired to an electric source. "In case there is a loss of power, there is a battery backup. If the battery runs low, the weapon has a transmitter that sends a coded message – either by satellite or directly to a GRU post at a Russian embassy or consulate." [58]

Lunev was personally looking for hiding places for weapons caches in the Shenandoah Valley area. [58] He said that "it is surprisingly easy to smuggle nuclear weapons into the US" either across the Mexican border or using a small transport missile that can slip though undetected when launched from a Russian airplane. [58] Searches of the areas identified by Lunev – who admits he never planted any weapons in the US – have been conducted, "but law-enforcement officials have never found such weapons caches, with or without portable nuclear weapons" in the US. [59]

In a 2004 interview, colonel general of RVSN Viktor Yesin said that Soviet small-scale nuclear bombs have only been operated by the Army. All such devices have been stored in a weapons depot within Russia, and only left it for checks at the plant which produced them. [60]

2020 Russian nuclear deterrence state policy

On June 2, 2020, President Putin signed an Executive Order formally titled "Fundamentals of Russia’s Nuclear Deterrence State Policy", in an unprecedented public release of an official document on Russia's nuclear policy. [61] The six-page document identified the range of threats that Russia seeks to deter with its nuclear forces, clarified Russia’s general approach to nuclear deterrence, and articulated conditions under which Russia might use of nuclear weapons. [62] The policy endorses the use of nuclear weapons in response to a non-nuclear strike due to the improved capabilities of U.S. conventional weapons. [63]

Radiological weapons

The assassination of Alexander Litvinenko by Russian state agents with radioactive polonium was described as the beginning of an era of nuclear terrorism using radiological weapons. [64] [65] [66]

Russian invasion of Ukraine

Vladimir Putin in September 2022 Vladimir Putin (2022-09-20) 2.jpg
Vladimir Putin in September 2022

During the Russian invasion of Ukraine that began in 2022, Russian President Vladimir Putin placed Strategic Rocket Forces's nuclear deterrence units on high alert, a move heavily condemned internationally. [67] Putin warned that "whoever tries to hinder us in Ukraine would see consequences, you have never seen in your history". [68] According to the US Director of National Intelligence, Avril Haines, Putin could potentially turn to nuclear weapons if he perceived an "existential threat" to the Russian state or regime; [69] there has been speculation that he could regard defeat in Ukraine as an existential threat to his regime. [70]

According to a peer-reviewed study published in the journal Nature Food in August 2022, [71] a full-scale nuclear war between the United States and Russia, which together hold more than 90% of the world's nuclear weapons, would kill 360 million people directly and more than 5 billion indirectly by starvation during a nuclear winter. [72] [73]

In September 2022, Putin announced the mobilization of Russian forces, and threatened nuclear retaliation against the west if Russia's territorial integrity was threatened. [74]

On February 21, 2023, Putin suspended Russia's participation in the New START nuclear arms reduction treaty with the United States, [75] saying that Russia would not allow the US and NATO to inspect its nuclear facilities. [76] On 25 March 2023, Putin announced that Russia would be stationing tactical nuclear operations in Belarus. [77] On 14 June 2023, Belarusian President Aleksander Lukashenko stated that Belarus had started to take delivery of nuclear weapons in a TV interview with Russian state channel, Russia-1. [78]

Biological weapons

The Soviet Union covertly operated the world's largest, longest, and most sophisticated biological weapons programs. [12] The program began in the 1920s and lasted until at least September 1992 but has possibly been continued by Russia after that. [12] Thereby, the Soviet Union violated its obligations under the Biological Weapons Convention, which it had signed on April 10, 1972, and ratified on March 26, 1975. [79]

In the early 1970s, the Soviet Union significantly enlarged its offensive biological weapons programs. [80] After 1975, the program of biological weapons was run primarily by the "civilian" Biopreparat agency, although it also included numerous facilities run by the Soviet Ministry of Defense, Ministry of Agriculture, Ministry of Chemical Industry, Ministry of Health, and Soviet Academy of Sciences. [81]

According to Ken Alibek, who was deputy-director of Biopreparat, the Soviet biological weapons agency, and who defected to the United States in 1992, weapons were developed in labs in isolated areas of the Soviet Union including mobilization facilities at Omutninsk, Penza and Pokrov and research facilities at Moscow, Stirzhi and Vladimir. These weapons were tested at several facilities most often at "Rebirth Island" (Vozrozhdeniya) in the Aral Sea by firing the weapons into the air above monkeys tied to posts, the monkeys would then be monitored to determine the effects. According to Alibek, although Soviet offensive program was officially ended in 1992, Russia may be still involved in the activities prohibited by BWC. [81]

In 1993, the story about the Sverdlovsk anthrax leak was published in Russia. The incident occurred when spores of anthrax were accidentally released from a military facility in the city of Sverdlovsk (formerly, and now again, Yekaterinburg) 1,500 km (930 mi) east of Moscow on April 2, 1979. The ensuing outbreak of the disease resulted in 94 people becoming infected, 64 of whom died over a period of six weeks. [81]

As of 2021, the United States Department of State "assesses that the Russian Federation (Russia) maintains an offensive [biological weapons] program and is in violation of its obligation under Articles I and II of the BWC. The issue of compliance by Russia with the BWC has been of concern for many years". [82]

Chemical weapons

Russia signed the Chemical Weapons Convention on January 13, 1993, and ratified it on November 5, 1997. Russia declared an arsenal of 39,967 tons of chemical weapons in 1997 consisting of:

Ratification was followed by three years of inaction on chemical weapons destruction because of the August 1998 Russian financial crisis.

Russia met its treaty obligations by destroying 1% of its chemical agents by the Chemical Weapons Convention's 2002 deadline, [83] but requested technical and financial assistance and extensions on the deadlines of 2004 and 2007 due to the environmental challenges of chemical disposal. This extension procedure spelled out in the treaty has been utilized by other countries, including the United States. The extended deadline for complete destruction (April 2012) was not met. [84] As of October 2011, Russia had destroyed 57% of its stockpile. Russia also destroyed all of its declared Category 2 (10,616 MTs) and Category 3 chemicals. [14]

Russia has stored its chemical weapons (or the required chemicals) which it declared within the CWC at 8 locations: in Gorny (Saratov Oblast) (2.9% of the declared stockpile by mass) and Kambarka (Udmurt Republic) (15.9%) stockpiles already have been destroyed. In Shchuchye (Kurgan Oblast) (13.6%), Maradykovsky (Kirov Oblast) (17.4%) and Leonidovka (Penza Oblast) (17.2%) destruction takes place, while installations are under construction in Pochep (Bryansk Oblast) (18.8%) and Kizner (Udmurt Republic) (14.2%). [13]

The last Russian chemical disposal facility in Kizner, Udmurtia, was opened in December 2013. [85]

On September 27, 2017, OPCW announced that Russia had destroyed its entire declared chemical weapons stockpile, [86] [87] [88] even though they continued using Novichok agents. Ukraine claims Russia used chemical weapons in Mariupol. [89]

Novichok agents

A range of Novichok agents were developed and tested in the 1970s and 1980s, but the intended Novichok weapons production site at the Pavlodar Chemical Plant in Soviet Kazakhstan was still under construction when it was decided to demolish the chemical weapons building in 1987 in view of the forthcoming Chemical Weapons Convention. [90] [91]

In March 2018, former GRU agent Sergei Skripal and his daughter were poisoned in Salisbury, United Kingdom by a chemical agent later confirmed to be Novichok. [92] The incident raised new controversy over Russia's potential production and use of chemical weapons, with the United Kingdom accusing the Russian government or rogue Russian agents of orchestrating the attack, a claim Russia repeatedly denied. [93]

In August 2020, Russian opposition figure and anti-corruption activist Alexei Navalny was poisoned in Tomsk, Russia by a chemical agent later confirmed to be Novichok. [94] A joint investigation by Bellingcat, CNN, Der Spiegel, and The Insider with contributions from El País implicates Russia's Federal Security Service (FSB) in the near-fatal nerve-agent poisoning, [95] a fact denied by Russia. Navalny later called what appears to be one of the FSB agents responsible for the cleanup operation who indicates they were tasked to clean Navalny's underpants of Novichok. [96]

Use during the invasion of Ukraine

In the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Russian forces reportedly used chemical weapons 465 times between 24 February 2022 and December 2023, usually as tear gas grenades. [97] [98] The use of tear gas is banned by international Chemical Weapons Convention and considered a chemical weapon if applied by military forces during warfare. [99]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty</span> 1972 arms control treaty between the United States and the Soviet Union

The Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, also known as the ABM Treaty or ABMT, was an arms control treaty between the United States and the Soviet Union on the limitation of the anti-ballistic missile (ABM) systems used in defending areas against ballistic missile-delivered nuclear weapons. It was intended to reduce pressures to build more nuclear weapons to maintain deterrence. Under the terms of the treaty, each party was limited to two ABM complexes, each of which was to be limited to 100 anti-ballistic missiles.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons</span> International treaty

The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, commonly known as the Non-Proliferation Treaty or NPT, is an international treaty whose objective is to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and weapons technology, to promote cooperation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy, and to further the goal of achieving nuclear disarmament and general and complete disarmament. Between 1965 and 1968, the treaty was negotiated by the Eighteen Nation Committee on Disarmament, a United Nations-sponsored organization based in Geneva, Switzerland.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear disarmament</span> Act of eliminating nuclear weapons

Nuclear disarmament is the act of reducing or eliminating nuclear weapons. Its end state can also be a nuclear-weapons-free world, in which nuclear weapons are completely eliminated. The term denuclearization is also used to describe the process leading to complete nuclear disarmament.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear warfare</span> Military conflict that deploys nuclear weaponry

Nuclear warfare, also known as atomic warfare, is a military conflict or prepared political strategy that deploys nuclear weaponry. Nuclear weapons are weapons of mass destruction; in contrast to conventional warfare, nuclear warfare can produce destruction in a much shorter time and can have a long-lasting radiological result. A major nuclear exchange would likely have long-term effects, primarily from the fallout released, and could also lead to secondary effects, such as "nuclear winter", nuclear famine, and societal collapse. A global thermonuclear war with Cold War-era stockpiles, or even with the current smaller stockpiles, may lead to various scenarios including the extinction of the human species.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Weapon of mass destruction</span> Weapon that can kill many people or cause great damage

A weapon of mass destruction (WMD) is a biological, chemical, radiological, nuclear, or any other weapon that can kill or significantly harm many people or cause great damage to artificial structures, natural structures, or the biosphere. The scope and usage of the term has evolved and been disputed, often signifying more politically than technically. Originally coined in reference to aerial bombing with chemical explosives during World War II, it has later come to refer to large-scale weaponry of warfare-related technologies, such as biological, chemical, radiological, or nuclear warfare.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty</span> US-Soviet/Russian treaty (1987–2019)

The Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty was an arms control treaty between the United States and the Soviet Union. US President Ronald Reagan and Soviet General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev signed the treaty on 8 December 1987. The US Senate approved the treaty on 27 May 1988, and Reagan and Gorbachev ratified it on 1 June 1988.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear arms race</span> Part of the Post-WWII era and the Cold War

The nuclear arms race was an arms race competition for supremacy in nuclear warfare between the United States, the Soviet Union, and their respective allies during the Cold War. During this same period, in addition to the American and Soviet nuclear stockpiles, other countries developed nuclear weapons, though no other country engaged in warhead production on nearly the same scale as the two superpowers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States and weapons of mass destruction</span>

The United States is known to have possessed three types of weapons of mass destruction: nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons. The U.S. is the only country to have used nuclear weapons on another country, when it detonated two atomic bombs over two Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II. It had secretly developed the earliest form of the atomic weapon during the 1940s under the title "Manhattan Project". The United States pioneered the development of both the nuclear fission and hydrogen bombs. It was the world's first and only nuclear power for four years, from 1945 until 1949, when the Soviet Union produced its own nuclear weapon. The United States has the second-largest number of nuclear weapons in the world, after the Russian Federation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">China and weapons of mass destruction</span>

The People's Republic of China has developed and possesses weapons of mass destruction, including chemical and nuclear weapons. The first of China's nuclear weapons tests took place in 1964, and its first hydrogen bomb test occurred in 1966 at Lop Nur. Tests continued until 1996, when the country signed the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT), but did not ratify it. China acceded to the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) in 1984 and ratified the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) in 1997.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nunn–Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction</span> US initiative to reduce risk stemming from former USSR republics nuclear weapons

As the collapse of the Soviet Union appeared imminent, the United States and their NATO allies grew concerned of the risk of nuclear weapons held in the Soviet republics falling into enemy hands. The Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) program was initiated by the Nunn–Lugar Act, which was authored and cosponsored by Sens. Sam Nunn (D-GA) and Richard Lugar (R-IN). The purpose of the CTR Program was originally "to secure and dismantle weapons of mass destruction and their associated infrastructure in former Soviet Union states." As the peace dividend grew old, an alternative 2009 explanation of the program was "to secure and dismantle weapons of mass destruction in states of the former Soviet Union and beyond". The CTR program funds have been disbursed since 1997 by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chemical weapon proliferation</span> Prevalence and spread of chemical weapons

Many nations continue to research and/or stockpile chemical weapon agents despite numerous efforts to reduce or eliminate them. Most states have joined the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), which required the destruction of all chemical weapons by 2012. Twelve nations have declared chemical weapons production facilities and six nations have declared stockpiles of chemical weapons. All of the declared production facilities have been destroyed or converted for civilian use after the treaty went into force.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Poland and weapons of mass destruction</span>

Poland is not known or believed to possess weapons of mass destruction. During the Cold War, Soviet nuclear warheads were stockpiled in Poland and designated to deploy within the Polish People's Army. Poland was also working with Russia to help eliminate the large stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons developed by the Warsaw Pact countries. Poland ratified the Geneva Protocol on 4 February 1929.

Novichok is a family of nerve agents, some of which are binary chemical weapons. The agents were developed at the GosNIIOKhT state chemical research institute by the Soviet Union and Russia between 1971 and 1993. Some Novichok agents are solids at standard temperature and pressure, while others are liquids. Dispersal of solid form agents is thought possible if in ultrafine powder state.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear weapons of the United States</span>

The United States was the first country to manufacture nuclear weapons and is the only country to have used them in combat, with the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in World War II. Before and during the Cold War, it conducted 1,054 nuclear tests, and tested many long-range nuclear weapons delivery systems.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tactical nuclear weapon</span> Nuclear weapon designed for use on a battlefield

A tactical nuclear weapon (TNW) or non-strategic nuclear weapon (NSNW) is a nuclear weapon that is designed to be used on a battlefield in military situations, mostly with friendly forces in proximity and perhaps even on contested friendly territory. Generally smaller in explosive power, they are defined in contrast to strategic nuclear weapons, which are designed mostly to be targeted at the enemy interior far away from the war front against military bases, cities, towns, arms industries, and other hardened or larger-area targets to damage the enemy's ability to wage war. As of 2024, tactical nuclear weapons have never been used.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Albania and weapons of mass destruction</span>

Albania once possessed a stockpile of weapons of mass destruction. This stockpile of chemical weapons included 16,678 kilograms (36,769 lb) of mustard gas, lewisite, adamsite, and phenacyl chloride (chloroacetophenone).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Libya and weapons of mass destruction</span>

Libya pursued programs to develop or acquire weapons of mass destruction from when Muammar Gaddafi seized control of Libya in 1969 until he announced on 19 December 2003 that Libya would voluntarily eliminate all materials, equipment and programs that could lead to internationally proscribed weapons. This included weapons of mass destruction and long-range ballistic missiles.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bulgaria and weapons of mass destruction</span>

Bulgaria has developed weapons of mass destruction, most notably chemical weapons. Chemical weapons production was concentrated in Smyadovo. As of 2016, Bulgaria does not possess any weapons of mass destruction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">GosNIIOKhT</span> Russian research institute

The State Research Institute of Organic Chemistry and Technology (GosNIIOKhT) is a Russian research institute engaged in the development of chemical technologies for use in the national economy and the production of relevant goods and products.

References

  1. Sublette, Carey (December 12, 1997). "The Soviet Nuclear Weapons Program". nuclearweaponarchive.org. nuclearweaponarchives. Retrieved April 20, 2017.
  2. "Nuclear Notebook: Russian nuclear weapons, 2024".
  3. "Nuclear Notebook: Russian nuclear weapons, 2024".
  4. "Army 2019: Russian army discloses RS-28 Sarmat ICBM characteristics". Army Recognition. July 2, 2019.
  5. "Nuclear Notebook: Russian nuclear weapons, 2024".
  6. 1 2 "Status of World Nuclear Forces – Federation Of American Scientists". Fas.org.
  7. "Nuclear Weapons: Who Has What at a Glance". armscontrol.org.
  8. Kristensen, Hans M.; Norris, Robert S. (2006). "Global nuclear stockpiles, 1945-2006". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 62 (4): 64–66. Bibcode:2006BuAtS..62d..64N. doi:10.2968/062004017. S2CID   145147992.
  9. "Disarmament Treaties Database: 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved February 7, 2021.
  10. "Disarmament Treaties Database: Biological Weapons Convention". United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved February 16, 2021.
  11. "Disarmament Treaties Database: Chemical Weapons Convention". United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved February 7, 2021.
  12. 1 2 3 4 Leitenberg, M., Zilinskas, R., & Kuhn, J. (2012). "Conclusion". In The Soviet Biological Weapons Program (pp. 698–712). Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England: Harvard University Press. Retrieved February 7, 2021, from JSTOR   j.ctt2jbscf.30
  13. 1 2 "Russia profile". NTI.org. 2009. Archived from the original on June 5, 2011. Retrieved September 17, 2010.
  14. 1 2 "Opening Statement by the Director-General to the Conference of the States Parties at its Sixteenth Session". OPCW. November 28, 2011. Retrieved May 1, 2012.
  15. "Syria, Russia, and the Global Chemical Weapons Crisis". Arms Control Association. Retrieved March 1, 2022.
  16. "The Budapest Memorandum and Crimea". VOA. March 2, 2014. Retrieved October 24, 2014.
  17. 1 2 "START I". The Nuclear Threat Initiative. Retrieved March 1, 2022.
  18. "START II". The Nuclear Threat Initiative. Retrieved March 1, 2022.
  19. "SORT". The Nuclear Threat Initiative. Retrieved March 1, 2022.
  20. "New START at a Glance | Arms Control Association". www.armscontrol.org. Retrieved March 1, 2022.
  21. Majumdar, Dave (March 1, 2018). "Russia's Nuclear Weapons Buildup Is Aimed at Beating U.S. Missile Defenses". The National Interest. USA. Retrieved October 26, 2018.
  22. "122 countries adopt 'historic' UN treaty to ban nuclear weapons". CBC News. July 7, 2017.
  23. "Russia may have violated the INF Treaty. Here's how the United States appears to have done the same". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. February 7, 2019.
  24. Kramer, Andrew E. (May 12, 2016). "Russia Calls New U.S. Missile Defense System a 'Direct Threat'". The New York Times. NYT.
  25. Hurlbert, Heather (October 26, 2018). "Russia Violated an Arms Treaty. Trump Ditched It, Making the Nuclear Threat Even Worse". New York Magazine. USA. Retrieved October 26, 2018.
  26. Andrew Osborn (November 2, 2023). "Putin withdraws Russia's ratification of global nuclear test ban treaty". Reuters .
  27. Cirincione, Joseph (October 22, 2013). Nuclear Nightmares: Securing the World Before It Is Too Late. New York: Columbia University Press. p. 53. ISBN   978-0-231-16404-7 . Retrieved March 15, 2022.
  28. "Russian Nuclear Weapons, 2024". The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists..
  29. 1 2 Новую тяжелую ракету "Сармат" будут делать в Красноярске Rossiyskaya Gazeta , 2 Feb 2015.
  30. "РС-28 / ОКР Сармат, ракета 15А28 - SS-X-30 (проект) - MilitaryRussia.Ru — отечественная военная техника (после 1945г.)".
  31. Gady, Franz-Stefan (January 12, 2016). "Russia to Test-Launch 16 Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles in 2016". The Diplomat .
  32. "SS-30 ?? / R-X-? Sarmat New Heavy ICBM". globalsecurity.org. Archived from the original on February 5, 2020. Retrieved January 17, 2015.
  33. "Russia plans new ICBM to replace Cold War 'Satan' missile". Reuters. December 17, 2013. Retrieved January 17, 2015.
  34. "Минобороны рассказало о тяжелой баллистической ракете - неуязвимом для ПРО ответе США". May 31, 2014.
  35. John Pike. "Status-6 Ocean Multipurpose System".
  36. 1 2 3 Why A Russian Super-Radioactive Atomic Torpedo Isn't The News You Think It Is
  37. 1 2 "Russia reveals nuclear torpedo plan". BBC News. November 12, 2015.
  38. 1 2 Diplomat, Franz-Stefan Gady, The. "Revealed: Russia's Top Secret Nuclear Torpedo". The Diplomat.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  39. 1 2 3 Russian Mystery Submarine Likely Deployment Vehicle for New Nuclear Torpedo. USNI News.
  40. "What Is The Purpose Of Russia's Deadly Status-6 Torpedo". December 8, 2015.
  41. 1 2 3 Pifer, Steven (November 18, 2015). "Russia's perhaps-not-real super torpedo". Brookings Institution . Retrieved July 5, 2019.
  42. 1 2 3 4 Oliphant R. Secret Russian radioactive doomsday torpedo leaked on television. Telegraph. 13 Nov 2015
  43. Lockie, Alex (December 24, 2016). "Trump questions the US's nuclear arsenal: Here's how the US's nukes compare to Russia's". Archived from the original on September 4, 2017. Retrieved December 26, 2016.
  44. "Pentagon Confirms Russia's Thermonuclear Submarine Bomb Is Real". December 8, 2016.
  45. "Putin boasts of new Russian nuclear weapons - ABC News". abcnews.go.com. Archived from the original on March 1, 2018. Retrieved January 15, 2022.
  46. "Russia has 'invincible' nuclear weapons". BBC News. March 1, 2018.
  47. Russian military doctrine (in Russian)
  48. Gessen, Masha (October 19, 2018). "Putin Lied About His Nuclear Doctrine and Promised Russians That They Would Go to Heaven". The New Yorker.
  49. "Read the fine print: Russia's nuclear weapon use policy". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists . March 10, 2022.
  50. Blank, Stephen (February 25, 2018). "Getting Russia's nuclear strategy mostly right". The Hill. USA. Retrieved October 26, 2018.
  51. Tyrants and the Bomb Archived June 6, 2009, at the Wayback Machine - by Ion Mihai Pacepa, National Review , October 17, 2006
  52. Committee on International Security and Arms Control (January 15, 1994). Management and Disposition of Excess Weapons Plutonium (Paperback). 41: National Academies Press. ISBN   978-0-309-05042-5 . Retrieved December 14, 2023. ... Victor Mikhailov, head of the Russian Ministry of Atomic Energy (MINATOM), reportedly indicated that the Russian ... Soviet Atom Arsenal Was Larger Than West Estimated," The New York Times, September 26, 1993. Mikhailov's figures are ...{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location (link)
  53. "Russian Officials Deny Claims Of Missing Nuclear Weapons" . Retrieved October 24, 2014.
  54. "Nuclear Dangers: Fear Increases of Terrorists Getting Hands on 'Loose' Warheads as Security Slips". October 19, 1997. Archived from the original on December 30, 2013. Retrieved October 24, 2014.
  55. Russia secretly offered North Korea nuclear technology - by a Special Correspondent in Pyongyang and Michael Hirst, Telegraph, September 7, 2006.
  56. "Russia expresses serious concern over DPRK nuke issue". Archived from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved October 24, 2014.
  57. "Guardian: Russia pushing 'unsuitable' nuclear power in Africa". Kyiv Post. August 28, 2019. Retrieved August 28, 2019.
  58. 1 2 3 Stanislav Lunev. Through the Eyes of the Enemy: The Autobiography of Stanislav Lunev, Regnery, 1998. ISBN   0-89526-390-4.
  59. Steve Goldstein and Chris Mondics, "Some Weldon-backed allegations unconfirmed; Among them: A plot to crash planes into a reactor, and missing suitcase-size Soviet atomic weapons". Philadelphia Inquirer (15 March 2006) A7.
  60. Novikova, Inna (March 29, 2004). "Куда исчезли 'ядерные чемоданчики'?". Pravda (in Russian).
  61. "What's in Russia's New Nuclear Deterrence 'Basic Principles'?".
  62. "Revelations about Russia's Nuclear Deterrence Policy". June 19, 2020.
  63. "Putin signs Russia's nuclear deterrent policy". Associated Press . April 21, 2021.
  64. "Ushering in the era of nuclear terrorism", by Patterson, Andrew J. MD, PhD, Critical Care Medicine, v. 35, p. 953-954, 2007.
  65. "Beyond the Dirty Bomb: Re-thinking Radiological Terror", by James M. Acton; M. Brooke Rogers; Peter D. Zimmerman, doi : 10.1080/00396330701564760, Survival, Volume 49, Issue 3 September 2007, pp. 151 – 168
  66. Radiological Terrorism: 'Soft Killers' by Morten Bremer Mærli, Bellona Foundation
  67. "West slams Putin 'dangerous rhetoric' after Russian leader puts nuclear forces on alert". February 28, 2022.
  68. "Putin implies nuclear attack if West interferes in Ukraine. Why it's not just an empty threat". CBC News. February 25, 2022.
  69. "Putin prepping 'prolonged conflict' beyond Donbas, could escalate nuclear threats: Top US intel official". ABC News. May 10, 2022.
  70. "Putin could use nuclear weapon if he felt war being lost – US intelligence chief". The Guardian. May 10, 2022.
  71. Xia, Lili; Robock, Alan; Scherrer, Kim; Harrison, Cheryl S.; Bodirsky, Benjamin Leon; Weindl, Isabelle; Jägermeyr, Jonas; Bardeen, Charles G.; Toon, Owen B.; Heneghan, Ryan (August 15, 2022). "Global food insecurity and famine from reduced crop, marine fishery and livestock production due to climate disruption from nuclear war soot injection". Nature Food . 3 (8): 586–596. doi: 10.1038/s43016-022-00573-0 . hdl: 11250/3039288 . PMID   37118594. S2CID   251601831.
  72. Diaz-Maurin, François (October 20, 2022). "Nowhere to hide: How a nuclear war would kill you — and almost everyone else". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists .
  73. "World Nuclear war between the U.S. and Russia would kill more than 5 billion people – just from starvation, study finds". CBS News. August 16, 2022.
  74. "Putin announces partial mobilisation and threatens nuclear retaliation in escalation of Ukraine war". TheGuardian.com . September 21, 2022.
  75. "Putin pulls back from last remaining nuclear arms control pact with the US". CNN. February 21, 2023.
  76. "Putin defends Ukraine invasion, warns West in address". NHK World. February 21, 2023.
  77. "Putin Says Russia to Place Tactical Nuclear Arms in Belarus". Bloomberg News . March 25, 2023. Retrieved March 25, 2023.
  78. "Belarus starts taking delivery of Russian nuclear weapons". Reuters . June 14, 2023. Retrieved June 28, 2023.
  79. "Status of the Biological Weapons Convention". United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved February 7, 2021.
  80. Leitenberg, M., Zilinskas, R., & Kuhn, J. (2012). Beginnings of the “Modern” Soviet BW program, 1970–1977. In The Soviet Biological Weapons Program (pp. 51-78). Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England: Harvard University Press. Retrieved February 7, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt2jbscf.7
  81. 1 2 3 Alibek, K. and S. Handelman. Biohazard: The Chilling True Story of the Largest Covert Biological Weapons Program in the World– Told from Inside by the Man Who Ran it. Delta (2000) ISBN   0-385-33496-6
  82. "2021 Adherence to and Compliance With Arms Control, Nonproliferation, and Disarmament Agreements and Commitments". United States Department of State. Retrieved October 30, 2021.
  83. News Archived April 6, 2004, at the Wayback Machine
  84. "Global Campaign to Destroy Chemical Weapons Passes 60 Percent Mark" Archived July 11, 2010, at the Wayback Machine . OPCW . July 8, 2010. Retrieved August 19, 2010.
  85. "New Chemical Weapons Destruction Facility Opens at Kizner in the Russian Federation".
  86. "Путин поучаствовал в уничтожении последнего в России килограмма химоружия". РБК. September 27, 2017. Retrieved January 15, 2018.
  87. "OPCW Director-General Commends Major Milestone as Russia Completes Destruction of Chemical Weapons Stockpile under OPCW Verification". OPCW.
  88. "UK Delegation to the OPCW" (PDF).
  89. "Did Russia really use chemical weapons in Ukraine? Experts are sceptical". TheGuardian.com . April 12, 2022.
  90. "Kazakhstan – Chemical". Nuclear Threat Initiative. April 2015. Retrieved March 14, 2018.
  91. Bozheyeva, Gulbarshyn (Summer 2000). The Pavlodar Chemical Weapons Plant in Kazakhstan: History and Legacy (PDF) (Report). The Nonproliferation Review. Retrieved March 14, 2018.
  92. "Inspectors back UK in spy poisoning row". BBC News. April 12, 2018.
  93. "The curious case of Yulia Skripal's recorded phone call". DW.COM. April 6, 2018.
  94. "Chemical weapons body confirms nerve agent Novichok in Navalny's blood". reuters.com. October 6, 2020. Retrieved December 22, 2020.
  95. "FSB Team of Chemical Weapon Experts Implicated in Alexey Navalny Novichok Poisoning". bellingcat.com. December 14, 2020. Retrieved December 22, 2020.
  96. "Russian opposition leader Alexey Navalny dupes spy into revealing how he was poisoned". CNN.com. December 21, 2020. Retrieved December 22, 2020.
  97. Hambling, David (December 29, 2023). "What We Know About Russian Chemical Weapon Attacks". Forbes. Retrieved March 23, 2024.
  98. Kondrat, Anastasiia (December 27, 2023). "Russia has launched 465 chemical attacks since the start of the full-scale invasion". Svidomi. Retrieved December 27, 2023.
  99. Field, Matt (March 15, 2024). "Russia appears to be using chemical weapons in Ukraine. And admitting it". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. Retrieved March 23, 2024.

Further reading