Phytophthora infestans

Last updated

Phytophthora infestans
Late blight on potato leaf 2.jpg
Symptom of late blight on the underside of a potato leaf
Scientific classification OOjs UI icon edit-ltr.svg
Domain: Eukaryota
Clade: Diaphoretickes
Clade: SAR
Clade: Stramenopiles
Phylum: Oomycota
Order: Peronosporales
Family: Peronosporaceae
Genus: Phytophthora
Species:
P. infestans
Binomial name
Phytophthora infestans

Phytophthora infestans is an oomycete or water mold, a fungus-like microorganism that causes the serious potato and tomato disease known as late blight or potato blight. Early blight, caused by Alternaria solani , is also often called "potato blight". Late blight was a major culprit in the 1840s European, the 1845–1852 Irish, and the 1846 Highland potato famines. The organism can also infect some other members of the Solanaceae. [1] [2] [3] The pathogen is favored by moist, cool environments: sporulation is optimal at 12–18 °C (54–64 °F) in water-saturated or nearly saturated environments, and zoospore production is favored at temperatures below 15 °C (59 °F). Lesion growth rates are typically optimal at a slightly warmer temperature range of 20 to 24 °C (68 to 75 °F). [4]

Contents

Etymology

The genus name Phytophthora comes from the Greek φυτό (phyto), meaning "plant" – plus the Greek φθορά (phthora), meaning "decay, ruin, perish". The species name infestans is the present participle of the Latin verb infestare, meaning "attacking, destroying", from which the word "to infest" is derived. The name Phytophthora infestans was coined in 1876 by the German mycologist Heinrich Anton de Bary (1831–1888). [5] [6]

Life cycle, signs and symptoms

Tomato with Phytophthora infestans (late blight).jpg
Tomato late blight stem lesion 3 (5816739322).jpg
Tomato late blight fruit cluster (5816739612).jpg
Infected potato Phytophtora infestans-effects.jpg
Infected potato
Life cycle on potato 07 08 life cycle, Phytophthora infestans on potato, Peronosporales, Oomycota (M. Piepenbring).png
Life cycle on potato

The asexual life cycle of Phytophthora infestans is characterized by alternating phases of hyphal growth, sporulation, sporangia germination (either through zoospore release or direct germination, i.e. germ tube emergence from the sporangium), and the re-establishment of hyphal growth. [7] There is also a sexual cycle, which occurs when isolates of opposite mating type (A1 and A2, see § Mating types below) meet. Hormonal communication triggers the formation of the sexual spores, called oospores. [8] The different types of spores play major roles in the dissemination and survival of P. infestans. Sporangia are spread by wind or water and enable the movement of P. infestans between different host plants. The zoospores released from sporangia are biflagellated and chemotactic, allowing further movement of P. infestans on water films found on leaves or soils. Both sporangia and zoospores are short-lived, in contrast to oospores which can persist in a viable form for many years.

People can observe P. infestans produce dark green, then brown then black spots on the surface of potato leaves and stems, often near the tips or edges, where water or dew collects. [9] The sporangia and sporangiophores appear white on the lower surface of the foliage. As for tuber blight, the white mycelium often shows on the tubers' surface. [10]

Under ideal conditions, P. infestans completes its life cycle on potato or tomato foliage in about five days. [7] Sporangia develop on the leaves, spreading through the crop when temperatures are above 10 °C (50 °F) and humidity is over 75–80% for 2 days or more. Rain can wash spores into the soil where they infect young tubers, and the spores can also travel long distances on the wind. The early stages of blight are easily missed. Symptoms include the appearance of dark blotches on leaf tips and plant stems. White mold will appear under the leaves in humid conditions and the whole plant may quickly collapse. Infected tubers develop grey or dark patches that are reddish brown beneath the skin, and quickly decay to a foul-smelling mush caused by the infestation of secondary soft bacterial rots. Seemingly healthy tubers may rot later when in store.

P. infestans survives poorly in nature apart from on its plant hosts. Under most conditions, the hyphae and asexual sporangia can survive for only brief periods in plant debris or soil, and are generally killed off during frosts or very warm weather. The exceptions involve oospores, and hyphae present within tubers. The persistence of viable pathogen within tubers, such as those that are left in the ground after the previous year's harvest or left in cull piles is a major problem in disease management. In particular, volunteer plants sprouting from infected tubers are thought to be a major source of inoculum (or propagules) at the start of a growing season. [11] This can have devastating effects by destroying entire crops.

Mating types

The mating types are broadly divided into A1 and A2. [12] [13] Until the 1980s populations could only be distinguished by virulence assays and mating types, but since then more detailed analysis has shown that mating type and genotype are substantially decoupled. [14] These types each produce a mating hormone of their own. [13] [12] Pathogen populations are grouped into clonal lineages of these mating types and includes:

A1

A1 produces a mating hormone, a diterpene [13] α1. [12] Clonal lineages of A1 include:

  • CN-1CN-1, -2, -4, -5, -6, -7, -8 – mtDNA haplotype Ia, China in 1996–97 [15]
  • CN-3 – Ia, China, 1996–97 [15]
  • CN-10 – Ia, China, 2004 [15]
  • CN-11 – IIb, China, 2000 & 2002 [15]
  • CN01 – IIa, China, 2004–09 [15]
  • CN03 – Ia/IIb, China, 2004–09 [15]
  • FAM-1 – (only presumed to be A1), mtDNA haplo Ia subtype HERB-1, Japan, Philippines, India, China, Malaysia, Nepal, present some time before 1950 [15]
  • IN-1 – Ia, India, Nepal, 1993 [15]
  • IN-2 – Ia, India, 1993 [15]
  • JP-2JP-2/SIB-1/RF006 – mtDNA haplo IIa, distinguishable by RG57, intermediate level of metalaxyl resistance, Japan, China, Korea, Thailand, 1996–present [15]
  • JP-3 – IIa, distinguishable by RG57, intermediate level of metalaxyl resistance, Japan, 1996–present [15]
  • JP-4 – IIa, distinguishable by RG57, intermediate level of metalaxyl resistance, Japan, 1996–present [15]
  • KR-1 Zhangsensu Zhang (not to be confused with #KR-1 sensu Gotoh below) – IIa, Korea, 2002–04 [15]
  • KR_1_A1KR_1_A1 – mtDNA haplo unknown, Korea, 2009–16 [15]
  • MO-6 – Ia, China, 2004 [15]
  • NP-1 – Ia, India, Nepal, 1993, 1996–97 [15]
  • NP-2 – Ia, Nepal, 1997 [15]
  • NP1 – Ia, Nepal, 1999–2000 [15]
  • NP2 A1 – (Also A2, see #the A2 type of NP2 below) Ia, Nepal, 1999–2000 [15]
  • NP3 (not to be confused with #US-1 below) – Ib, Nepal, 1999–2000 [15]
  • US-1 (not to be confused with #NP3/US-1 above) – Ib, [13] [15] China, India, Nepal, Japan, Taiwan, Thailand, Vietnam, 1940–2000 [15]
  • NP4, 5, 7, and 9 – Ia, Nepal, 1999–2000 [15]
  • NP6 – mtDNA haplo unknown, Nepal, 1999–2000 [15]
  • US-11 – IIb, Taiwan, Korea, Vietnam, 1998–2016 [15]
  • US-16 – IIb, China, 2002 & 2004 [15]
  • US-17 [13] – IIa, Korea, 2003–04 [15]
  • US-23 [14]
  • US-24 [14]
  • 2_A1 – Ia, Indonesia, 2016–19 [15]
  • T30-4 [14]

A2

Discovered by John Niederhauser in the 1950s, in the Toluca Valley in Central Mexico, while working for the Rockefeller Foundation's Mexican Agriculture Program. Published in Niederhauser 1956. [13] [15] A2 produces a mating hormone α2. [12] Clonal lineages of A2 include:

  • CN02 – See #13_A2/CN02 below
  • US-22 – with mtDNA haplotype H-20 [14]
  • JP-1 – IIa, Japan, Korea, Indonesia, late 1980s–present [15]
  • KR-1 Gotohsensu Gotoh (not to be confused with #KR-1 sensu Zhang above) – IIa, differs from JP-1 by one RG57 band, Korea, 1992 [15]
  • KR_2_A2 – mtDNA haplo unknown, Korea, 2009–16 [15]
  • CN-9 – Ia, China, 2001 [15]
  • NP2 A2 – (Also A1, see #the A1 type of NP2 above) Ia, Nepal, 1999–2000 [15]
  • NP8 – Ib, Nepal, 1999–2000 [15]
  • NP10 & 11 – Ia, Nepal, 1999–2000 [15]
  • TH-1 – Ia, Thailand, China, Nepal, 1994 & 1997 [15]
  • Unknown – Ib, India, 1996–2003 [15]
  • BR-1 – Brazil [13]
  • US-7 [13]
  • US-8 [13]
  • US-14 – IIa, Korea, 2002–03 [15]
  • 13_A2 [16] [14] [15] /CN02 – Ia, China, India, Bangladesh, Nepal, Pakistan, Myanmar, 2005–19 [15]

Self-fertile

A self-fertile type was present in China between 2009 and 2013. [15]

Physiology

PiINF1 is the INF1 in P. infestans. Hosts respond with autophagy upon detection of this elicitor, Liu et al. 2005 finding this to be the only alternative to mass hypersensitivity leading to mass programmed cell death. [17]

Genetics

P. infestans is diploid, with about 8–10 chromosomes, and in 2009 scientists completed the sequencing of its genome. The genome was found to be considerably larger (240 Mbp) than that of most other Phytophthora species whose genomes have been sequenced; P. sojae has a 95 Mbp genome and P. ramorum had a 65 Mbp genome. About 18,000 genes were detected within the P. infestans genome. It also contained a diverse variety of transposons and many gene families encoding for effector proteins that are involved in causing pathogenicity. These proteins are split into two main groups depending on whether they are produced by the water mold in the symplast (inside plant cells) or in the apoplast (between plant cells). Proteins produced in the symplast included RXLR proteins, which contain an arginine-X-leucine-arginine (where X can be any amino acid) sequence at the amino terminus of the protein. Some RXLR proteins are avirulence proteins, meaning that they can be detected by the plant and lead to a hypersensitive response which restricts the growth of the pathogen. P. infestans was found to encode around 60% more of these proteins than most other Phytophthora species. Those found in the apoplast include hydrolytic enzymes such as proteases, lipases and glycosylases that act to degrade plant tissue, enzyme inhibitors to protect against host defence enzymes and necrotizing toxins. Overall the genome was found to have an extremely high repeat content (around 74%) and to have an unusual gene distribution in that some areas contain many genes whereas others contain very few. [1] [18]

The pathogen shows high allelic diversity in many isolates collected in Europe. [19] This may be due to widespread trisomy or polyploidy in those populations. [19] : 61 

Research

Study of P. infestans presents sampling difficulties in the United States. [20] : 43  It occurs only sporadically and usually has significant founder effects due to each epidemic starting from introduction of a single genotype. [20] : 43 

Origin and diversity

Histological model of a potato leaf cross-section, Botanical Museum Greifswald Modell eines Querschnitts durch ein Kartoffelblatt mit Phytophthora infestans (Kartoffelpilz) -Osterloh Nr. 55- -Brendel 10 k, 1- (2).jpg
Histological model of a potato leaf cross-section, Botanical Museum Greifswald

The highlands of central Mexico are considered by many to be the center of origin of P. infestans, although others have proposed its origin to be in the Andes, which is also the origin of potatoes. [21] [22] A recent study evaluated these two alternate hypotheses and found conclusive support for central Mexico being the center of origin. [23] Support for Mexico – specifically the Toluca Valley [20] – comes from multiple observations including the fact that populations are genetically most diverse in Mexico, late blight is observed in native tuber-bearing Solanum species, populations of the pathogen are in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, the two mating (see § Mating types above) types occur in a 1:1 ratio, and detailed phylogeographic and evolutionary studies. [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] Furthermore, the closest relatives of P. infestans, namely P. mirabilis and P. ipomoeae are endemic to central Mexico. [29] On the other hand, the only close relative found in South America, namely P. andina , is a hybrid that does not share a single common ancestor with P. infestans. Finally, populations of P. infestans in South America lack genetic diversity and are clonal. [23] [30] [31]

Migrations from Mexico to North America or Europe have occurred several times throughout history, probably linked to the movement of tubers. [32] [33] Until the 1970s, the A2 mating type was restricted to Mexico, but now in many regions of the world both A1 and A2 isolates can be found in the same region. [13] The co-occurrence of the two mating types is significant due to the possibility of sexual recombination and formation of oospores, which can survive the winter. Only in Mexico and Scandinavia, however, is oospore formation thought to play a role in overwintering. [22] [34] In other parts of Europe, increasing genetic diversity has been observed as a consequence of sexual reproduction. [35] This is notable since different forms of P. infestans vary in their aggressiveness on potato or tomato, in sporulation rate, and sensitivity to fungicides. [36] Variation in such traits also occurs in North America, however importation of new genotypes from Mexico appears to be the predominant cause of genetic diversity, as opposed to sexual recombination within potato or tomato fields. [13] In 1976 – due to a summer drought in Europe – there was a potato production shortfall and so eating potatoes were imported to fill the shortfall. It is thought that this was the vehicle for mating type A2 to reach the rest of the world. In any case, there had been little diversity, consisting of the US-1 strain, and of that only one type of: mating type, mtDNA, restriction fragment length polymorphism, and di-locus[ clarification needed ] isozyme. Then in 1980 suddenly greater diversity and A2 appeared in Europe. In 1981 it was found in the Netherlands, United Kingdom, 1985 in Sweden, the early 1990s in Norway and Finland, 1996 in Denmark, and 1999 in Iceland. In the UK new A1 lineages only replaced the old lineage by end of the '80s, and A2 spread even more slowly, with Britain having low levels and Ireland (north and Republic) having none-to-trace detections through the '90s. [37] Many of the strains that appeared outside of Mexico since the 1980s have been more aggressive, leading to increased crop losses. [13] In Europe since 2013 the populations have been tracked by the EuroBlight network (see links below). Some of the differences between strains may be related to variation in the RXLR effectors that are present.

Disease management

P. infestans is still a difficult disease to control. [3] [38] [39] [40] There are many chemical options in agriculture for the control of damage to the foliage as well as the fruit (for tomatoes) and the tuber [41] (for potatoes). A few of the most common foliar-applied fungicides are Ridomil, a Gavel/SuperTin tank mix, and Previcur Flex. All of the aforementioned fungicides need to be tank mixed with a broad-spectrum fungicide such as mancozeb or chlorothalonil not just for resistance management but also because the potato plants will be attacked by other pathogens at the same time.

If adequate field scouting occurs and late blight is found soon after disease development, localized patches of potato plants can be killed with a desiccant (e.g. paraquat) through the use of a backpack sprayer. This management technique can be thought of as a field-scale hypersensitive response similar to what occurs in some plant-viral interactions whereby cells surrounding the initial point of infection are killed in order to prevent proliferation of the pathogen.

If infected tubers make it into a storage bin, there is a very high risk to the storage life of the entire bin. Once in storage, there isn't much that can be done besides emptying the parts of the bin that contain tubers infected with Phytophthora infestans. To increase the probability of successfully storing potatoes from a field where late blight was known to occur during the growing season, some products can be applied just prior to entering storage (e.g. Phostrol). [42]

Around the world the disease causes around $6 billion of damage to crops each year. [1] [2]

Resistant plants

Potatoes after exposure. The normal potatoes have blight but the cisgenic potatoes are healthy. Cisgenicpotatoes.JPG
Potatoes after exposure. The normal potatoes have blight but the cisgenic potatoes are healthy.
Genetically modified King Edward (right) next to King Edward which has not been genetically modified (left). Research field, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 2019 Alskade knol - utflykt med SLU till deras potatisforsoksodlingar - 20190825 09 (cropped).jpg
Genetically modified King Edward (right) next to King Edward which has not been genetically modified (left). Research field, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 2019

Breeding for resistance, particularly in potato plants, has had limited success in part due to difficulties in crossing cultivated potato to its wild relatives, [38] [39] [40] which are the source of potential resistance genes. [38] [39] [40] In addition, most resistance genes only work against a subset of P. infestans isolates, since effective plant disease resistance only results when the pathogen expresses a RXLR effector gene that matches the corresponding plant resistance (R) gene; effector-R gene interactions trigger a range of plant defenses, such as the production of compounds toxic to the pathogen.

Potato and tomato varieties vary in their susceptibility to blight. [35] [38] [39] [40] Most early varieties are very vulnerable; they should be planted early so that the crop matures before blight starts (usually in July in the Northern Hemisphere). Many old crop varieties, such as King Edward potato are also very susceptible but are grown because they are wanted commercially. Maincrop varieties which are very slow to develop blight include Cara, Stirling, Teena, Torridon, Remarka, and Romano. Some so-called resistant varieties can resist some strains of blight and not others, so their performance may vary depending on which are around. [35] [38] [39] [40] These crops have had polygenic resistance bred into them, and are known as "field resistant". New varieties [38] [39] [40] such as Sarpo Mira and Sarpo Axona show great resistance to blight even in areas of heavy infestation. Defender is an American cultivar whose parentage includes Ranger Russet and Polish potatoes resistant to late blight. It is a long white-skinned cultivar with both foliar and tuber resistance to late blight. Defender was released in 2004. [43]

Genetic engineering may also provide options for generating resistance cultivars. A resistance gene effective against most known strains of blight has been identified from a wild relative of the potato, Solanum bulbocastanum , and introduced by genetic engineering into cultivated varieties of potato. [44] This is an example of cisgenic genetic engineering. [45]

Melatonin in the plant/P. infestans co-environment reduces the stress tolerance of the parasite. [46]

Reducing inoculum

Blight can be controlled by limiting the source of inoculum. [35] Only good-quality seed potatoes and tomatoes obtained from certified suppliers should be planted. Often discarded potatoes from the previous season and self-sown tubers can act as sources of inoculum. [47]

Compost, soil or potting medium can be heat-treated to kill oomycetes such as Phytophthora infestans. The recommended sterilisation temperature for oomycetes is 120 °F (49 °C) for 30 minutes. [48] [49]

Environmental conditions

There are several environmental conditions that are conducive to P. infestans. An example of such took place in the United States during the 2009 growing season. As colder than average for the season and with greater than average rainfall, there was a major infestation of tomato plants, specifically in the eastern states. [50] By using weather forecasting systems, such as BLITECAST, if the following conditions occur as the canopy of the crop closes, then the use of fungicides is recommended to prevent an epidemic. [51]

The Beaumont and Smith periods have traditionally been used by growers in the United Kingdom, with different criteria developed by growers in other regions. [53] The Smith period has been the preferred system used in the UK since its introduction in the 1970s. [54]

Based on these conditions and other factors, several tools have been developed to help growers manage the disease and plan fungicide applications. Often these are deployed as part of Decision support systems accessible through web sites or smart phones.

Several studies have attempted to develop systems for real-time detection via flow cytometry or microscopy of airborne sporangia collected in air samplers. [55] [56] [57] Whilst these methods show potential to allow detection of sporangia in advance of occurrence of detectable disease symptoms on plants, and would thus be useful in enhancing existing Decision support systems, none have been commercially deployed to date.

Use of fungicides

Spraying potato, Nottinghamshire Potato blight spraying system.jpg
Spraying potato, Nottinghamshire

Fungicides for the control of potato blight are normally only used in a preventative manner, optionally in conjunction with disease forecasting. In susceptible varieties, sometimes fungicide applications may be needed weekly. An early spray is most effective. The choice of fungicide can depend on the nature of local strains of P. infestans. Metalaxyl is a fungicide that was marketed for use against P. infestans, but suffered serious resistance issues when used on its own. In some regions of the world during the 1980s and 1990s, most strains of P. infestans became resistant to metalaxyl, but in subsequent years many populations shifted back to sensitivity. To reduce the occurrence of resistance, it is strongly advised to use single-target fungicides such as metalaxyl along with carbamate compounds. A combination of other compounds are recommended for managing metalaxyl-resistant strains. These include mandipropamid, chlorothalonil, fluazinam, triphenyltin, mancozeb, and others. In the United States, the Environmental Protection Agency has approved oxathiapiprolin for use against late blight. [58] In African smallholder production fungicide application can be necessary up to once every three days. [59]

In organic production

In the past, copper(II) sulfate solution (called 'bluestone') was used to combat potato blight. Copper pesticides remain in use on organic crops, both in the form of copper hydroxide and copper sulfate. Given the dangers of copper toxicity, other organic control options that have been shown to be effective include horticultural oils, phosphorous acids, and rhamnolipid biosurfactants, while sprays containing "beneficial" microbes such as Bacillus subtilis or compounds that encourage the plant to produce defensive chemicals (such as knotweed extract) have not performed as well. [60] During the crop year 2008, many of the certified organic potatoes produced in the United Kingdom and certified by the Soil Association as organic were sprayed with a copper pesticide [61] to control potato blight. According to the Soil Association, the total copper that can be applied to organic land is 6 kilograms per hectare (5.4 lb/acre)/year. [62]

Control of tuber blight

Ridging is often used to reduce tuber contamination by blight. This normally involves piling soil or mulch around the stems of the potato blight meaning the pathogen has farther to travel to get to the tuber. [63] Another approach is to destroy the canopy around five weeks before harvest, using a contact herbicide or sulfuric acid to burn off the foliage. Eliminating infected foliage reduces the likelihood of tuber infection.

Historical impact

Suggested paths of migration and diversification of lineages HERB-1 and US-1 Suggested paths of migration and diversification of P. infestans lineages HERB-1 and US-1.jpg
Suggested paths of migration and diversification of lineages HERB-1 and US-1

The first recorded instances of the disease were in the United States, in Philadelphia and New York City in early 1843. [64] Winds then spread the spores, and in 1845 it was found from Illinois to Nova Scotia, and from Virginia to Ontario. It crossed the Atlantic Ocean with a shipment of seed potatoes for Belgian farmers in 1845. [65] [66] The disease being first identified in Europe around Kortrijk, Flanders, in the June 1845, and resulted in the Flemish potato harvest failing that summer, yields declining 75-80%, leading to an estimated forty thousand deaths in the locale. [67] All of the potato-growing countries in Europe would be affected, within a year.

The effect of Phytophthora infestans in Ireland in 1845–52 was one of the factors which caused over one million to starve to death [68] and forced another two million to emigrate. Most commonly referenced is the Great Irish Famine, during the late 1840s. Implicated in Ireland's fate was the island's disproportionate dependency on a single variety of potato, the Irish Lumper. The lack of genetic variability created a susceptible host population for the organism [69] after the blight strains originating in Chiloé Archipelago replaced earlier potatoes of Peruvian origin in Europe. [70]

During the First World War, all of the copper in Germany was used for shell casings and electric wire and therefore none was available for making copper sulfate to spray potatoes. A major late blight outbreak on potato in Germany therefore went untreated, and the resulting scarcity of potatoes contributed to the deaths from the blockade. [71] [72]

Since 1941, Eastern Africa has been suffering potato production losses because of strains of P. infestans from Europe. [73]

France, Canada, the United States, and the Soviet Union researched P. infestans as a biological weapon in the 1940s and 1950s. [74] Potato blight was one of more than 17 agents that the United States researched as potential biological weapons before the nation suspended its biological weapons program. [75] Whether a weapon based on the pathogen would be effective is questionable, due to the difficulties in delivering viable pathogen to an enemy's fields, and the role of uncontrollable environmental factors in spreading the disease. [76]

Late blight (A2 type) has not yet been detected in Australia and strict biosecurity measures are in place. The disease has been seen in China, India and south-east Asian countries.

A large outbreak of P. infestans occurred on tomato plants in the Northeast United States in 2009. [77]

In light of the periodic epidemics of P. infestans ever since its first emergence, it may be regarded as a periodically emerging pathogen – or a periodically "re-emerging pathogen". [78] [79]

Related Research Articles

Blight is a specific symptom affecting plants in response to infection by a pathogenic organism.

<i>Phytophthora</i> Genus of single-celled organisms

Phytophthora is a genus of plant-damaging oomycetes, whose member species are capable of causing enormous economic losses on crops worldwide, as well as environmental damage in natural ecosystems. The cell wall of Phytophthora is made up of cellulose. The genus was first described by Heinrich Anton de Bary in 1875. Approximately 210 species have been described, although 100–500 undiscovered Phytophthora species are estimated to exist.

Rebecca J. Nelson is an American biologist and a professor at Cornell University and a MacArthur Foundation Fellow.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Metalaxyl</span> Chemical compound

Metalaxyl is an acylalanine fungicide with systemic function. Its chemical name is methyl N-(methoxyacetyl)-N-(2,6-xylyl)-DL-alaninate. It can be used to control Pythium in a number of vegetable crops, and Phytophthora in peas. Metalaxyl-M is the ISO common name and Ridomil Gold is the trade name for the optically pure (-) / D / R active stereoisomer, which is also known as mefenoxam.

<i>Phytophthora palmivora</i> Species of single-celled organism

Phytophthora palmivora is an oomycete that causes bud-rot of palms, fruit-rot or kole-roga of coconut and areca nut. These are among the most serious diseases caused by fungi and moulds in South India. It occurs almost every year in Malnad, Mysore, North & South Kanara, Malabar and other areas. Similar diseases of palms are also known to occur in Sri Lanka, Mauritius, and Sumatra. The causative organism was first identified as P. palmivora by Edwin John Butler in 1917.

Pythium ultimum is a plant pathogen. It causes damping off and root rot diseases of hundreds of diverse plant hosts including maize, soybean, potato, wheat, fir, and many ornamental species. P. ultimum belongs to the peronosporalean lineage of oomycetes, along with other important plant pathogens such as Phytophthora spp. and many genera of downy mildews. P. ultimum is a frequent inhabitant of fields, freshwater ponds, and decomposing vegetation in most areas of the world. Contributing to the widespread distribution and persistence of P. ultimum is its ability to grow saprotrophically in soil and plant residue. This trait is also exhibited by most Pythium spp. but not by the related Phytophthora spp., which can only colonize living plant hosts.

<i>Phytophthora erythroseptica</i> Species of single-celled organism

Phytophthora erythroseptica—also known as pink rot along with several other species of Phytophthora—is a plant pathogen. It infects potatoes causing their tubers to turn pink and damages leaves. It also infects tulips (Tulipa) damaging their leaves and shoots.

<i>Alternaria solani</i> Species of fungus

Alternaria solani is a fungal pathogen that produces a disease in tomato and potato plants called early blight. The pathogen produces distinctive "bullseye" patterned leaf spots and can also cause stem lesions and fruit rot on tomato and tuber blight on potato. Despite the name "early", foliar symptoms usually occur on older leaves. If uncontrolled, early blight can cause significant yield reductions. Primary methods of controlling this disease include preventing long periods of wetness on leaf surfaces and applying fungicides. Early blight can also be caused by Alternaria tomatophila, which is more virulent on stems and leaves of tomato plants than Alternaria solani.

<i>Plasmopara viticola</i> Species of single-celled organism

Plasmopara viticola, the causal agent of grapevine downy mildew, is a heterothallic oomycete that overwinters as oospores in leaf litter and soil. In the spring, oospores germinate to produce macrosporangia, which under wet condition release zoospores. Zoospores are splashed by rain into the canopy, where they swim to and infect through stomata. After 7–10 days, yellow lesions appear on foliage. During favorable weather the lesions sporulate and new secondary infections occur.

<i>Phytophthora capsici</i> Species of single-celled organism

Phytophthora capsici is an oomycete plant pathogen that causes blight and fruit rot of peppers and other important commercial crops. It was first described by L. Leonian at the New Mexico State University Agricultural Experiment Station in Las Cruces in 1922 on a crop of chili peppers. In 1967, a study by M. M. Satour and E. E. Butler found 45 species of cultivated plants and weeds susceptible to P. capsici In Greek, Phytophthora capsici means "plant destroyer of capsicums". P. capsici has a wide range of hosts including members of the families Solanaceae and Cucurbitaceae as well as Fabaceae.

Phytophthora megakarya is an oomycete plant pathogen that causes black pod disease in cocoa trees in west and central Africa. This pathogen can cause detrimental loss of yield in the economically important cocoa industry, worth approximately $70 billion annually. It can damage any part of the tree, causing total yield losses which can easily reach 20-25%. A mixture of chemical and cultural controls, as well as choosing resistant plant varieties, are often necessary to control this pathogen.

Black pod disease is a fungal disease of Cocoa trees. It is mostly found in tropical areas where cocao trees grow, and its spores are spread via the heavy rainfalls that can occur in tropical climates. Annually, the pathogen can cause a yield loss of up to 1/3, and up to 10% of total trees can be lost completely.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Niklaus Grunwald</span> American biologist and plant pathologist

Niklaus J. Grünwald is a biologist and plant pathologist born and raised in Caracas, Venezuela of German and Swiss ancestry. He is currently a research scientist with the USDA Agricultural Research Service, a Professor (Courtesy) in the Department of Botany and Plant Pathology at Oregon State University, and a Professor (Adjunct) in the Department of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology at Cornell University.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Collar rot</span> Disease of plants

Collar rot is a symptomatically described disease that is usually caused by any one of various fungal and oomycete plant pathogens. It is present where the pathogen causes a lesion localized at or about the collet between the stem and the root. The lesions develop around the stem eventually forming a "collar". Observationally, collar rot grades into "basal stem rot", and with some pathogens is the first phase of "basal stem rot" often followed by "root rot". Collar rot is most often observed in seedings grown in infected soil. The pathogens that cause collar rot may be species or genera specific. But generalist pathogens such as Agroathelia rolfsii are known to attack over 200 different species. While bacteria caused collar rot is not common, trees infected with Fire blight may develop collar rot. Non-parasitic collar rot may be caused by winter damage.

Buckeye rot of tomato is caused by three species of pathogens in the genus Phytophthora: P. nicotianae var. parasitica, P. capsici, and P. drechsleri. It is an oomycete that thrives in warm, wet conditions and lives in the soil. It is characterized by a bull’s eye pattern of dark brown rotting on the tomato fruit, and affects fruit that is close to, or lying on the soil. The easiest management is to keep the plant out of contact with the soil, although other chemical methods can be very effective. This disease commonly occurs in the southeast and south central areas of the United States. The disease has affected a large portion of crop yield in the United States as well as India. The relatively small genome size of Phytophthora parasitica compared to Phytophthora infestans gives researchers the unique ability to further examine its ability to cause disease.

Phytophthora hydropathica is an oomycete plant pathogen that is found in aquatic environments such as irrigation and river water. The pathogen was previously classified as P. drechsleri Dre II before being categorized as its own distinct species. P. hydropathica has been primarily found in association with ornamental plant nurseries. The pathogen has been isolated throughout the Southern United States, as well as internationally in Mexico, Italy, and Spain.

The Vertifolia effect is a well documented phenomenon in the fields of plant breeding and plant pathology. It is characterized by the erosion of a crop’s horizontal resistance to disease during a breeding cycle due to the presence of strong vertical resistance, characterized by the presence of R genes. This effect was observed in late blight of potato. This phenomenon was first described by J.E. Van der Plank in his 1963 book Plant Disease: Epidemics and Control. Van der Plank observed that under artificial selection the potato variety Vertifolia had stronger vertical resistance to the potato late blight pathogen, Phytophthora infestans, as measured by the presence of specific R genes. However, when the pathogen overcame these R genes Vertifolia exhibited a greater loss of horizontal resistance than varieties with fewer R genes and lower vertical resistance. This effect suggests that when a pathogen evolves an avirulence gene to counteract a variety’s R gene, that variety will be more susceptible to the pathogen than other varieties.

Maria Petronella Löhnis was a Dutch phytopathologist, microbiologist and botanist noted for studying potato diseases.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Chand, Sudeep (9 September 2009), Killer genes cause potato famine, BBC News , retrieved 26 September 2009
  2. 1 2 Nowicki, Marcin; et al. (17 August 2011), "Potato and tomato late blight caused by Phytophthora infestans: An overview of pathology and resistance breeding", Plant Disease , 96 (1), American Phytopathological Society: 4–17, doi:10.1094/PDIS-05-11-0458, PMID   30731850
  3. 1 2 Nowicki, Marcin; et al. (11 October 2013), "Late Blight of Tomato", Translational Genomics for Crop Breeding, pp. 241–65, doi:10.1002/9781118728475.ch13, ISBN   978-1-118-72847-5, S2CID   83142160
  4. ↑ Haverkort, A. J.; Struik, P. C.; Visser, R. G. F.; Jacobsen, E (2009), "Applied biotechnology to combat late blight in potato caused by Phytophthora infestans", Potato Research (Submitted manuscript), 52 (3): 249–64, doi:10.1007/s11540-009-9136-3, S2CID   2850128
  5. ↑ Bary, A. de (1876). "Researches into the nature of the potato fungus Phytophthora infestans". Journal of the Royal Society of Agriculture of England . 2nd series. 12. Royal Society of Agriculture of England: 239–269.
  6. ↑ "Taxonomy browser (Phytophthora infestans)". www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.
  7. 1 2 Nowicki, Marcin; et al. (15 May 2013), "A simple dual stain for detailed investigations of plant-fungal pathogen interactions", Vegetable Crops Research Bulletin , 77: 61–74, doi: 10.2478/v10032-012-0016-z
  8. ↑ Judelson HS, Blanco FA (2005) The spores of Phytophthora: weapons of the plant destroyer. Nature Microbiology Reviews 3: 47–58.
  9. ↑ "Late Blight in Potato". North Dakota State University Agriculture Department. May 2017. Retrieved 2021-11-30.
  10. ↑ Fry, W. E.; Grünwald, N. J. (2010), "Introduction to Oomycetes", The Plant Health Instructor , doi:10.1094/PHI-I-2010-1207-01
  11. ↑ Koepsell, Paul A.; Pscheidt, Jay W. (1994), 1994 Pacific Northwest Plant Disease Control Handbook, Corvallis: Oregon State University Press, p. 165
  12. 1 2 3 4 Judelson, Howard S. (2017-09-08). "Metabolic Diversity and Novelties in the Oomycetes". Annual Review of Microbiology . 71 (1). Annual Reviews: 21–39. doi:10.1146/annurev-micro-090816-093609. ISSN   0066-4227. PMID   28504899.
  13. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Fry, William E. (2008). "Phytophthora infestans: The plant (and R gene) destroyer". Molecular Plant Pathology . 9 (3): 385–402. doi:10.1111/j.1364-3703.2007.00465.x. PMC   6640234 . PMID   18705878.
  14. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Fry, William E. (2016-08-04). "Phytophthora infestans: New Tools (and Old Ones) Lead to New Understanding and Precision Management". Annual Review of Phytopathology . 54 (1). Annual Reviews: 529–547. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080615-095951 . ISSN   0066-4286. PMID   27359366.
  15. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 Guha Roy, Sanjoy; Dey, Tanmoy; Cooke, David E. L.; Cooke, Louise R. (2021-02-27). "The dynamics of Phytophthora infestans populations in the major potato-growing regions of Asia". Plant Pathology . 70 (5). Wiley-Blackwell: 1015–1031. doi:10.1111/ppa.13360. ISSN   0032-0862. S2CID   233882518.
  16. ↑ Cooke, David E. L.; Cano, Liliana M.; Raffaele, Sylvain; Bain, Ruairidh A.; Cooke, Louise R.; Etherington, Graham J.; Deahl, Kenneth L.; Farrer, Rhys A.; Gilroy, Eleanor M.; Goss, Erica M.; Grünwald, Niklaus J.; Hein, Ingo; MacLean, Daniel; McNicol, James W.; Randall, Eva; Oliva, Ricardo F.; Pel, Mathieu A.; Shaw, David S.; Squires, Julie N.; Taylor, Moray C.; Vleeshouwers, Vivianne G. A. A.; Birch, Paul R. J.; Lees, Alison K.; Kamoun, Sophien (4 October 2012). "Genome Analyses of an Aggressive and Invasive Lineage of the Irish Potato Famine Pathogen". PLOS Pathogens . 8 (10): e1002940. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002940 . PMC   3464212 . PMID   23055926.
  17. ↑ Yang, Meng; Ismayil, Asigul; Liu, Yule (2020-09-29). "Autophagy in Plant-Virus Interactions". Annual Review of Virology . 7 (1). Annual Reviews: 403–419. doi:10.1146/annurev-virology-010220-054709. ISSN   2327-056X. PMID   32530794. S2CID   219621432.
  18. ↑ Haas, Brian J.; Kamoun, Sophien; Zody, Michael; Jiang, Rays; Handsaker, Robert; Cano, Liliana; Grabherr, Manfred; Kodira, Chinnappa; Raffaele, Sylvain; Torto-Alalibo, Trudy; Bozkurt, Tolga; Ah-Fong, Audrey; Alvarado, Lucia; Anderson, Vicky; Armstrong, Miles; Avrova, Anna; Baxter, Laura; Beynon, Jim; Boevink, Petra; Bollmann, Stephanie; Bos, Jorunn; Bulone, Vincent; Cai, Guohong; Cakir, Cahid; Carrington, James; Chawner, Megan; Conti, Lucio; Costanzo, Stefano; Ewan, Richard; Fahlgren, Noah; Fischbach, Michael; Fugelstad, Johanna; Gilroy, Eleanor; Gnerre, Sante; Green, Pamela; Grenville-Briggs, Laura; Griffith, John; Grünwald, Niklaus; Horn, Karolyn; Horner, Neil; Hu, Chia-Hui; Huitema, Edgar; Jeong, Dong-Hoon; Jones, Alexandra; Jones, Jonathan; Jones, Richard; Karlsson, Elinor; Kunjeti, Sridhara; Lamour, Kurt; Liu, Zhenyu; Ma, LiJun; MacLean, Daniel; Chibucos, Marcus; McDonald, Hayes; McWalters, Jessica; Meijer, Harold; Morgan, William; Morris, Paul; Munro, Carol; O'Neill, Keith; Ospina-Giraldo, Manuel; Pinzón, Andrés; Pritchard, Leighton; Ramsahoye, Bernard; Ren, Qinghu; Restrepo, Silvia; Roy, Sourav; Sadanandom, Ari; Savidor, Alon; Schornack, Sebastian; Schwartz, David; Schumann, Ulrike; Schwessinger, Ben; Seyer, Lauren; Sharpe, Ted; Silvar, Cristina; Song, Jing; Studholme, David; Sykes, Sean; Thines, Marco; van de Vondervoort, Peter; Phuntumart, Vipaporn; Wawra, Stephan; Weide, Rob; Win, Joe; Young, Carolyn; Zhou, Shiguo; Fry, William; Meyers, Blake; van West, Pieter; Ristaino, Jean; Govers, Francine; Birch, Paul; Whisson, Stephen; Judelson, Howard; Nusbaum, Chad (2009). "Genome sequence and analysis of the Irish potato famine pathogen Phytophthora infestans" (PDF). Nature . 461 (7262). Nature Portfolio: 393–398. Bibcode:2009Natur.461..393H. doi: 10.1038/nature08358 . ISSN   0028-0836. PMID   19741609. S2CID   4385549.
  19. 1 2 Lamour, Kurt (2013). Phytophthora: A Global Perspective. CABI Plant Protection Series. Centre for Agriculture and Bioscience International. pp. xi+244. ISBN   978-1-78064-093-8. LCCN   2012042152.
  20. 1 2 3 Milgroom, Michael (2015). Population Biology of Plant Pathogens : Genetics, Ecology, and Evolution. St. Paul, Minnesota, US: APS Press The American Phytopathological Society. ISBN   978-0-89054-450-1. LCCN   2014943809.
  21. ↑ Gomez-Alpizar, L; Carbone, I; Ristaino, JB (2007). "An Andean origin of Phytophthora infestans inferred from mitochondrial and nuclear gene genealogies". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences . 104 (9). National Academy of Sciences of the United States: 3306–11. Bibcode:2007PNAS..104.3306G. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0611479104 . PMC   1805513 . PMID   17360643.
  22. 1 2 3 Grünwald, N. J.; Flier, W. G. (2005). "The Biology of Phytophthora infestans at Its Center of Origin". Annual Review of Phytopathology . 43: 171–90. doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.43.040204.135906. PMID   16078881.
  23. 1 2 3 Goss, E. M.; Tabima, J. F.; Cooke, D. E. L.; Restrepo, S.; Fry, W. E.; Forbes, G. A.; Fieland, V. J.; Cardenas, M.; Grünwald, N. J. (2014). "The Irish potato famine pathogen Phytophthora infestans originated in central Mexico rather than the Andes". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences . 111 (24): 8791–96. Bibcode:2014PNAS..111.8791G. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1401884111 . PMC   4066499 . PMID   24889615.
  24. ↑ Grünwald, N. J.; Flier, W. G.; Sturbaum, A. K.; Garay-Serrano, E.; Van Den Bosch, T. B. M.; Smart, C. D.; Matuszak, J. M.; Lozoya-Saldaña, H.; Turkensteen, L. J.; Fry, W. E. (2001). "Population Structure of Phytophthora infestans in the Toluca Valley Region of Central Mexico". Phytopathology . 91 (9). American Phytopathological Society: 882–90. doi:10.1094/PHYTO.2001.91.9.882. PMID   18944234.
  25. ↑ Flier, W. G.; Grünwald, N. J.; Kroon, L. P. N. M.; Sturbaum, A. K.; Van Den Bosch, T. B. M.; Garay-Serrano, E.; Lozoya-Saldaña, H.; Fry, W. E.; Turkensteen, L. J. (2003). "The population structure of Phytophthora infestans from the Toluca valley of central Mexico suggests genetic differentiation between populations from cultivated Potato and wild Solanum spp". Phytopathology . 93 (4). American Phytopathological Society: 382–90. doi:10.1094/PHYTO.2003.93.4.382. PMID   18944351.
  26. ↑ Flier, W. G.; Grünwald, N. J.; Fry, W. E.; Turkensteen, L. J. (2001). "Formation, production and viability of oospores of Phytophthora infestans from potato and Solanum demissum in the Toluca Valley, central Mexico". Mycological Research . 105 (8): 998–1006. doi:10.1016/S0953-7562(08)61958-9.
  27. ↑ Forbes, G. A.; Escobar, X. C.; Ayala, C. C.; Revelo, J.; Ordoñez, M. E.; Fry, B. A.; Doucett, K.; Fry, W. E. (1997). "Population genetic structure of Phytophthora infestans in Ecuador". Phytopathology . 87 (4). American Phytopathological Society: 375–80. doi:10.1094/PHYTO.1997.87.4.375. PMID   18945115.
  28. ↑ Spielman, L. J.; Drenth, A.; Davidse, L. C.; Sujkowski, L. J.; Gu, W.; Tooley, P. W.; Fry, W. E. (1991). "A second world-wide migration and population displacement of Phytophthora infestans?". Plant Pathology . 40 (3). Wiley-Blackwell (British Society for Plant Pathology): 422–30. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3059.1991.tb02400.x.
  29. ↑ Flier, W. G.; Grünwald, N. J.; Kroon, L. P. N. M.; Van Den Bosch, T. B. M.; Garay-Serrano, E.; Lozoya-Saldaña, H.; Bonants, P. J. M.; Turkensteen, L. J. (2002). "Phytophthora ipomoeae sp. nov., a new homothallic species causing leaf blight on Ipomoea longipedunculata in the Toluca Valley of central Mexico". Mycological Research . 106 (7): 848–56. doi:10.1017/S0953756202006123. S2CID   20294303.
  30. ↑ Goss, E. M.; Cardenas, M. E.; Myers, K.; Forbes, G. A.; Fry, W. E.; Restrepo, S.; Grünwald, N. J. (2011). "The plant pathogen Phytophthora andina emerged via hybridization of an unknown Phytophthora species and the Irish potato famine pathogen, P. infestans". PLOS ONE . 6 (9): e24543. Bibcode:2011PLoSO...624543G. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024543 . PMC   3174952 . PMID   21949727.
  31. ↑ Cárdenas, M.; Grajales, A.; Sierra, R.; Rojas, A.; González-Almario, A.; Vargas, A.; Marín, M.; Fermín, G.; Lagos, L. E.; Grünwald, N. J.; Bernal, A.; Salazar, C.; Restrepo, S. (2011). "Genetic diversity of Phytophthora infestans in the Northern Andean region". BMC Genetics . 12: 23. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-12-23 . PMC   3046917 . PMID   21303555.
  32. ↑ Goodwin, S. B.; Cohen, B. A.; Fry, W. E. (1994). "Panglobal distribution of a single clonal lineage of the Irish potato famine fungus". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences . 91 (24): 11591–95. Bibcode:1994PNAS...9111591G. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.24.11591 . PMC   45277 . PMID   7972108.
  33. ↑ Yoshida, K.; Schuenemann, V. J.; Cano, L. M.; Pais, M.; Mishra, B.; Sharma, R.; Lanz, C.; Martin, F. N.; Kamoun, Sophien; Krause, J.; Thines, M.; Weigel, D.; Burbano, H. A. (2013). "The rise and fall of the Phytophthora infestans lineage that triggered the Irish potato famine". eLife . 2: e00731. arXiv: 1305.4206 . doi: 10.7554/eLife.00731 . PMC   3667578 . PMID   23741619.
  34. ↑ Hannukkala, A.; Lehtinen, A. (2008). "Oospores of Phytphthora infestans in soil provide an important new source of primary inoculum in Finland". Agricultural and Food Science. 13 (4): 399. doi: 10.2137/1239099043633332 .
  35. 1 2 3 4 Nowakowska, Marzena; et al. (3 October 2014), "Appraisal of artificial screening techniques of tomato to accurately reflect field performance of the late blight resistance", PLOS ONE , 9 (10): e109328, Bibcode:2014PLoSO...9j9328N, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109328 , PMC   4184844 , PMID   25279467
  36. ↑ "Study provides evidence on movement of potato famine pathogen" . Retrieved 29 December 2016.
  37. ↑ Cooke, L. R.; Schepers, H. T. A. M.; Hermansen, A.; Bain, R. A.; Bradshaw, N. J.; Ritchie, F.; Shaw, D. S.; Evenhuis, A.; Kessel, G. J. T.; Wander, J. G. N.; Andersson, B.; Hansen, J. G.; Hannukkala, A.; Nærstad, R.; Nielsen, B. J. (2011-05-24). "Epidemiology and Integrated Control of Potato Late Blight in Europe". Potato Research . 54 (2). European Association for Potato Research (Springer): 183–222. doi: 10.1007/s11540-011-9187-0 . ISSN   0014-3065. S2CID   21251642.
  38. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "Biotech Potato Keeps Late Blight Disease in Check, New Study Finds". International Potato Center . 2019-02-21. Retrieved 2020-12-21.
  39. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Ghislain, Marc; Byarugaba, Arinaitwe Abel; Magembe, Eric; Njoroge, Anne; Rivera, Cristina; Román, María Lupe; Tovar, José Carlos; Gamboa, Soledad; Forbes, Gregory A.; Kreuze, Jan F.; Barekye, Alex; Kiggundu, Andrew (2018-12-21). "Stacking three late blight resistance genes from wild species directly into African highland potato varieties confers complete field resistance to local blight races". Plant Biotechnology Journal . 17 (6). Wiley: 1119–1129. doi:10.1111/pbi.13042. ISSN   1467-7644. PMC   6523587 . PMID   30467980.
  40. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Daba, Tadessa (2020-12-16). "Why a New Potato Variety Could Be a Game-Changer for Farmers in East Africa". Modern Farmer .
  41. ↑ "PlantVillage". Archived from the original on 2015-12-22. Retrieved 2015-12-16.
  42. ↑ Gevens, Amanda (March 23, 2019). "Expert advises on post-harvest treatment of common potato diseases". Potato News Today. Retrieved November 24, 2024.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  43. ↑ Novy, R. G.; Love, S. L.; et al. (2006), "Defender: A high-yielding, processing potato cultivar with foliar and tuber resistance to late blight", American Journal of Potato Research , 83 (1): 9–19, doi:10.1007/BF02869605, S2CID   41454585
  44. ↑ Song, Junqi; Bradeen, James M.; Naess, S. Kristine; Raasch, John A.; Wielgus, Susan M.; Haberlach, Geraldine T.; Liu, Jia; Kuang, Hanhui; Austin-Phillips, Sandra; Jiang, Jiming (2003), "Gene RB cloned from Solanum bulbocastanum confers broad spectrum resistance to potato late blight", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 100 (16): 9128–33, Bibcode:2003PNAS..100.9128S, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1533501100 , PMC   170883 , PMID   12872003
  45. ↑ Jacobsen, E.; Schouten, H. J. (2008). "Cisgenesis, a New Tool for Traditional Plant Breeding, Should be Exempted from the Regulation on Genetically Modified Organisms in a Step by Step Approach". Potato Research . 51: 75–88. doi:10.1007/s11540-008-9097-y. S2CID   38742532. Free version Archived 2015-09-23 at the Wayback Machine
  46. ↑ Socaciu, Andreea Iulia; Ionuţ, Răzvan; Socaciu, Mihai Adrian; Ungur, Andreea Petra; Bârsan, Maria; Chiorean, Angelica; Socaciu, Carmen; Râjnoveanu, Armand Gabriel (2020-07-21). "Melatonin, an ubiquitous metabolic regulator: functions, mechanisms and effects on circadian disruption and degenerative diseases". Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders . 21 (4). Springer: 465–478. doi:10.1007/s11154-020-09570-9. ISSN   1389-9155. PMID   32691289. S2CID   220657247.
  47. ↑ Zwankhuizen, Maarten J.; Govers, Francine; Zadoks, Jan C. (1998), "Development of potato late blight epidemics: Disease foci, disease gradients, and infection sources", Phytopathology , 88 (8), American Phytopathological Society: 754–63, doi:10.1094/PHYTO.1998.88.8.754, PMID   18944880
  48. ↑ "Phytophthora in nursery stock and restoration plantings". 4 September 2017.
  49. ↑ Baker, K., ed. (1957). The U.C. System for Producing Healthy Container Grown Plants, Manual 23. University of California, Division of Agricultural Sciences, Agricultural Experiment Station Extension Service.
  50. ↑ Moskin, Julia (17 July 2009), "Outbreak of Fungus Threatens Tomato Crop", The New York Times
  51. ↑ MacKenzie, D. R. (1981), "Scheduling fungicide applications for potato late blight with Blitecast", Plant Disease , 65 (5), American Phytopathological Society: 394–99, doi:10.1094/PD-65-394
  52. ↑ "Beaumont period". botanydictionary.org. Retrieved 3 March 2013.
  53. 1 2 "The Microbial World: Potato blight – Phytophthora infestans" . Retrieved 3 March 2013.
  54. ↑ "Obituary: L. Smith". The British Society for Plant Pathology. Retrieved 3 March 2013.
  55. ↑ Day, J.P.; D.B. Kell; G.W. Griffith (2001). "Differentiation of Phytophthora infestans sporangia from other airborne biological particles by flow cytometry". Applied and Environmental Microbiology . 68 (1): 37–45. doi:10.1128/AEM.68.1.37-45.2002. PMC   126536 . PMID   11772606.
  56. ↑ Griffith, G.W.; J.P. Day; D.B. Kell (2002). "Use of flow cytometry in the detection of plant pathogenic spores" (PDF). British Crop Protection Conference, Brighton, Nov 2002. Vol. 1. pp. 417–24.
  57. ↑ Fall, M. L.; Van der Heyden, H.; Brodeur, L.; Leclerc, Y.; Moreau, G.; Carisse, O. (6 June 2014). "Spatiotemporal variation in airborne sporangia of Phytophthora infestans: characterization and initiatives towards improving potato late blight risk estimation". Plant Pathology . 64 (1). Wiley-Blackwell (British Society for Plant Pathology): 178–90. doi: 10.1111/ppa.12235 . ISSN   0032-0862.
  58. ↑ "Oxathiapiprolin" (PDF). New Active Ingredient Review. Minnesota Department of Agriculture. October 2015. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-11-07. Retrieved 2017-11-09.
  59. ↑ Daba, Tadessa (2020-12-11). "Why a new potato variety could be a game-changed for farmers in East Africa". Alliance for Science . Retrieved 2021-09-01.
  60. ↑ Gevens, Amanda, University of Wisconsin Madison Extension. Managing Late Blight in Organic Tomato & Potato Crops Archived 2014-06-18 at the Wayback Machine .
  61. ↑ "Soil Association organic standards for producers" (PDF). 16; section 4.11.11. Soil Association. January 2009. p. 103. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2021-09-01.
  62. ↑ "Links to forms permitting application of copper fungicide on the website of the Soil Association". Soilassociation.org. Archived from the original on 15 October 2009. Retrieved 16 July 2010.
  63. ↑ Glass, J. R.; Johnson, K. B.; Powelson, M. L. (2001), "Assessment of Barriers to Prevent the Development of Potato Tuber Blight", Plant Disease , 85 (5), American Phytopathological Society: 521–28, doi:10.1094/PDIS.2001.85.5.521, PMID   30823129
  64. ↑ Flanagan, Pat (2024-02-19). "Potato blight appeared in US two years before Irish famine". Irish Mirror. Retrieved 2024-06-08.
  65. ↑ Reader, John (17 March 2008), "The Fungus That Conquered Europe", New York Times, retrieved 18 March 2008
  66. ↑ "Between two worlds: The Hungry Forties in Europe". RTÉ.ie . 27 January 2022.
  67. ↑ Vlaanderen, Canon van. "The Potato Crisis". Canon van Vlaanderen. Retrieved 2024-06-08.
  68. ↑ Bourouiba, Lydia (2021-01-05). "The Fluid Dynamics of Disease Transmission". Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics . 53 (1). Annual Reviews: 473–508. Bibcode:2021AnRFM..53..473B. doi: 10.1146/annurev-fluid-060220-113712 . ISSN   0066-4189. S2CID   225114407.
  69. ↑ "Great Famine potato makes a comeback after 170 years". IrishCentral. 2013-03-03. Retrieved 2013-03-05.
  70. ↑ Johanson, Mark (August 28, 2020). "Mash hits: the land that spawned the supermarket spud". The Economist. Retrieved September 1, 2020.
  71. ↑ "The Origin of Plant Pathology and The Potato Famine, and Other Stories of Plant Diseases". Archived from the original on 2016-03-04. Retrieved 2018-09-01.
  72. ↑ Carefoot, G.L.; Sprott, E.R. (1967). Famine on the Wind: Man's Battle Against Plant Disease. Rand McNally. p. 88.
  73. ↑ Njoroge, Anne W.; Andersson, Björn; Lees, Alison K.; Mutai, Collins; Forbes, Gregory A.; Yuen, Jonathan E.; Pelle, Roger (2019). "Genotyping of Phytophthora infestans in Eastern Africa Reveals a Dominating Invasive European Lineage". Phytopathology . 109 (4). American Phytopathological Society: 670–680. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-07-18-0234-R . PMID   30253119.
  74. ↑ Suffert, Frédéric; Latxague, Émilie; Sache, Ivan (2009), "Plant pathogens as agroterrorist weapons: assessment of the threat for European agriculture and forestry", Food Security , 1 (2): 221–232, doi:10.1007/s12571-009-0014-2, S2CID   23830595
  75. ↑ "Chemical and Biological Weapons: Possession and Programs Past and Present", James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies, Middlebury College, April 9, 2002, accessed November 14, 2008.
  76. ↑ Casadevall, Arturo; Pirofski, Liise-anne (June 2004). "The weapon potential of a microbe". Trends in Microbiology. 12 (6): 259–263. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2004.04.007. ISSN   0966-842X. PMC   7133335 . PMID   15165603.
  77. ↑ "The 2009 Late Blight Pandemic in Eastern USA". The 2009 Late Blight Pandemic in Eastern USA. Retrieved 2023-11-24.
  78. ↑ Fones, Helen N.; Bebber, Daniel P.; Chaloner, Thomas M.; Kay, William T.; Steinberg, Gero; Gurr, Sarah J. (2020-06-02). "Threats to global food security from emerging fungal and oomycete crop pathogens". Nature Food . 1 (6). Nature Research: 332–342. doi:10.1038/s43016-020-0075-0. ISSN   2662-1355. PMID   37128085. S2CID   219924805. –( "Author Correction: Threats to global food security from emerging fungal and oomycete crop pathogens". Nature Food . 1 (7). Nature Research: 455–456. 2020. doi: 10.1038/s43016-020-0111-0 . ISSN   2662-1355.)
  79. ↑ Fry, W. E.; Birch, P. R. J.; Judelson, H. S.; Grünwald, N. J.; Danies, G.; Everts, K. L.; Gevens, A. J.; Gugino, B. K.; Johnson, D. A.; Johnson, S. B.; McGrath, M. T.; Myers, K. L.; Ristaino, J. B.; Roberts, P. D.; Secor, G.; Smart, C. D. (2015). "Five Reasons to Consider Phytophthora infestans a Reemerging Pathogen". Phytopathology . 105 (7). American Phytopathological Society: 966–981. doi: 10.1094/phyto-01-15-0005-fi . ISSN   0031-949X. PMID   25760519. S2CID   27658217.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.