Geneva Protocol

Last updated

Geneva Protocol
Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare
Drafted17 June 1925 [1]
Signed17 June 1925 [1]
Location Geneva [1]
Effective8 February 1928 [1]
ConditionRatification by 65 states [2]
Signatories38 [1]
Parties146 [3]
DepositaryGovernment of France [1]
Full text
Wikisource-logo.svg Geneva Protocol to Hague Convention at Wikisource

The Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare, usually called the Geneva Protocol, is a treaty prohibiting the use of chemical and biological weapons in international armed conflicts. It was signed at Geneva on 17 June 1925 and entered into force on 8 February 1928. It was registered in League of Nations Treaty Series on 7 September 1929. [4] The Geneva Protocol is a protocol to the Convention for the Supervision of the International Trade in Arms and Ammunition and in Implements of War signed on the same date, and followed the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907.

Contents

It prohibits the use of "asphyxiating, poisonous or other gases, and of all analogous liquids, materials or devices" and "bacteriological methods of warfare". This is now understood to be a general prohibition on chemical weapons and biological weapons between state parties, but has nothing to say about production, storage or transfer. Later treaties did cover these aspects – the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) and the 1993 Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC).

A number of countries submitted reservations when becoming parties to the Geneva Protocol, declaring that they only regarded the non-use obligations as applying to other parties and that these obligations would cease to apply if the prohibited weapons were used against them. [5] [6]

Negotiation history

British troops blinded by poison gas during the Battle of Estaires, 1918 British 55th Division gas casualties 10 April 1918.jpg
British troops blinded by poison gas during the Battle of Estaires, 1918

In the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907, the use of dangerous chemical agents was outlawed. In spite of this, the First World War saw large-scale chemical warfare. France used tear gas in 1914, but the first large-scale successful deployment of chemical weapons was by the German Empire in Ypres, Belgium in 1915, when chlorine gas was released as part of a German attack at the Battle of Gravenstafel. Following this, a chemical arms race began, with the United Kingdom, Russia, Austria-Hungary, the United States, and Italy joining France and Germany in the use of chemical weapons.[ citation needed ]

This resulted in the development of a range of horrific chemicals affecting lungs, skin, or eyes. Some were intended to be lethal on the battlefield, like hydrogen cyanide, and efficient methods of deploying agents were invented. At least 124,000 tons were produced during the war. In 1918, about one grenade out of three was filled with dangerous chemical agents.[ citation needed ] Around 500k-1.3 million casualties of the conflict were attributed to the use of gas, and the psychological effect on troops may have had a much greater effect. A few thousand civilians also became casualties as collateral damage or due to production accidents. [7]

The Treaty of Versailles included some provisions that banned Germany from either manufacturing or importing chemical weapons. Similar treaties banned the First Austrian Republic, the Kingdom of Bulgaria, and the Kingdom of Hungary from chemical weapons, all belonging to the losing side, the Central powers. Russian bolsheviks and Britain continued the use of chemical weapons in the Russian Civil War and possibly in the Middle East in 1920.

Three years after World War I, the Allies wanted to reaffirm the Treaty of Versailles, and in 1922 the United States introduced the Treaty relating to the Use of Submarines and Noxious Gases in Warfare at the Washington Naval Conference. [8] Four of the war victors, the United States, the United Kingdom, the Kingdom of Italy and the Empire of Japan, gave consent for ratification, but it failed to enter into force as the French Third Republic objected to the submarine provisions of the treaty. [8]

At the 1925 Geneva Conference for the Supervision of the International Traffic in Arms the French suggested a protocol for non-use of poisonous gases. The Second Polish Republic suggested the addition of bacteriological weapons. [9] It was signed on 17 June. [10]

Historical assessment

Rabbit used to check for leaks at a sarin production plant in 1970 Sarin test rabbit.jpg
Rabbit used to check for leaks at a sarin production plant in 1970

Eric Croddy, assessing the Protocol in 2005, took the view that the historic record showed it had been largely ineffectual. Specifically it does not prohibit: [10]

In light of these shortcomings, Jack Beard notes that "the Protocol (...) resulted in a legal framework that allowed states to conduct [biological weapons] research, develop new biological weapons, and ultimately engage in [biological weapons] arms races". [6]

As such, the use of chemical weapons inside the nation's own territory against its citizens or subjects employed by Spain in the Rif War until 1927, [11] [12] Japan against Seediq indigenous rebels in Taiwan (then part of the Japanese colonial empire) in 1930 during the Musha Incident, Iraq against ethnic Kurdish civilians in the 1988 attack on Halabja during the Iran–Iraq War, and Syria or Syrian opposition forces during the Syrian civil war, nor use on Black Lives Matter protestors in the United States did not breach the Geneva Protocol. [13]

Despite the U.S. having been a proponent of the protocol, the U.S. military and American Chemical Society lobbied against it, causing the U.S. Senate not to ratify the protocol until 1975, the same year when the United States ratified the Biological Weapons Convention. [10] [14]

Violations

Several state parties have deployed chemical weapons for combat in spite of the treaty. Italy used mustard gas against the Ethiopian Empire in the Second Italo-Ethiopian War. In World War II, Germany employed chemical weapons in combat on several occasions along the Black Sea, notably in Sevastopol, where they used toxic smoke to force Russian resistance fighters out of caverns below the city. They also used asphyxiating gas in the catacombs of Odesa in November 1941, following their capture of the city, and in late May 1942 during the Battle of the Kerch Peninsula in eastern Crimea, perpetrated by the Wehrmacht's Chemical Forces and organized by a special detail of SS troops with the help of a field engineer battalion. [15] After the battle in mid-May 1942, the Germans gassed and killed almost 3,000 of the besieged and non-evacuated Red Army soldiers and Soviet civilians hiding in a series of caves and tunnels in the nearby Adzhimushkay quarry. [16]

During the 1980-1988 Iran-Iraq War, Iraq is known to have employed a variety of chemical weapons against Iranian forces. Some 100,000 Iranian troops were casualties of Iraqi chemical weapons during the war. [17] [18] [19]

Subsequent interpretation of the protocol

In 1966, United Nations General Assembly resolution 2162B called for, without any dissent, all states to strictly observe the protocol. In 1969, United Nations General Assembly resolution 2603 (XXIV) declared that the prohibition on use of chemical and biological weapons in international armed conflicts, as embodied in the protocol (though restated in a more general form), were generally recognized rules of international law. [20] Following this, there was discussion of whether the main elements of the protocol now form part of customary international law, and now this is widely accepted to be the case. [14] [21]

There have been differing interpretations over whether the protocol covers the use of harassing agents, such as adamsite and tear gas, and defoliants and herbicides, such as Agent Orange, in warfare. [14] [22] The 1977 Environmental Modification Convention prohibits the military use of environmental modification techniques having widespread, long-lasting or severe effects. Many states do not regard this as a complete ban on the use of herbicides in warfare, but it does require case-by-case consideration. [23] The 1993 Chemical Weapons Convention effectively banned riot control agents from being used as a method of warfare, though still permitting it for riot control. [24]

In recent times, the protocol had been interpreted to cover non-international armed conflicts as well international ones. In 1995, an appellate chamber in the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia stated that "there had undisputedly emerged a general consensus in the international community on the principle that the use of chemical weapons is also prohibited in internal armed conflicts." In 2005, the International Committee of the Red Cross concluded that customary international law includes a ban on the use of chemical weapons in internal as well as international conflicts. [25]

However, such views drew general criticism from legal authors. They noted that much of the chemical arms control agreements stems from the context of international conflicts. Furthermore, the application of customary international law to banning chemical warfare in non-international conflicts fails to meet two requirements: state practice and opinio juris. Jillian Blake & Aqsa Mahmud cited the periodic use of chemical weapons in non-international conflicts since the end of WWI (as stated above) as well as the lack of existing international humanitarian law (such as the Geneva Conventions) and national legislation and manuals prohibiting using them in such conflicts. [26] Anne Lorenzat stated the 2005 ICRC study was rooted in "'political and operational issues rather than legal ones". [27]

State parties

Parties to the Geneva Protocol

.mw-parser-output .legend{page-break-inside:avoid;break-inside:avoid-column}.mw-parser-output .legend-color{display:inline-block;min-width:1.25em;height:1.25em;line-height:1.25;margin:1px 0;text-align:center;border:1px solid black;background-color:transparent;color:black}.mw-parser-output .legend-text{}
Parties with no reservations
Parties with withdrawn reservations
Parties with implicit reservations
Parties with unwithdrawn reservations limiting the applicability of provisions of the Protocol
Non-parties Geneva Protocol parties.svg
Parties to the Geneva Protocol
  Parties with no reservations
  Parties with withdrawn reservations
  Parties with implicit reservations
  Parties with unwithdrawn reservations limiting the applicability of provisions of the Protocol
  Non-parties

To become party to the Protocol, states must deposit an instrument with the government of France (the depositary power). Thirty-eight states originally signed the Protocol. France was the first signatory to ratify the Protocol on 10 May 1926. El Salvador, the final signatory to ratify the Protocol, did so on 26 February 2008. As of April 2021, 146 states have ratified, acceded to, or succeeded to the Protocol, [3] most recently Colombia on 24 November 2015.

Reservations

A number of countries submitted reservations when becoming parties to the Geneva Protocol, declaring that they only regarded the non-use obligations as applying with respect to other parties to the Protocol and/or that these obligations would cease to apply with respect to any state, or its allies, which used the prohibited weapons. Several Arab states also declared that their ratification did not constitute recognition of, or diplomatic relations with, Israel, or that the provision of the Protocol were not binding with respect to Israel.

Generally, reservations not only modify treaty provisions for the reserving party, but also symmetrically modify the provisions for previously ratifying parties in dealing with the reserving party. [14] :394 Subsequently, numerous states have withdrawn their reservations, including the former Czechoslovakia in 1990 prior to its dissolution, [28] or the Russian reservation on biological weapons that "preserved the right to retaliate in kind if attacked" with them, which was dissolved by President Yeltsin. [29]

According to the Vienna Convention on Succession of States in respect of Treaties, states which succeed to a treaty after gaining independence from a state party "shall be considered as maintaining any reservation to that treaty which was applicable at the date of the succession of States in respect of the territory to which the succession of States relates unless, when making the notification of succession, it expresses a contrary intention or formulates a reservation which relates to the same subject matter as that reservation." While some states have explicitly either retained or renounced their reservations inherited on succession, states which have not clarified their position on their inherited reservations are listed as "implicit" reservations.

Party [1] [3] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] Signed [39] DepositedReservations [1] [14] [31] [32] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] Notes
Flag of the Taliban.svg  Afghanistan 2 September 1986
Flag of Albania.svg  Albania 12 December 1989
Flag of Algeria.svg  Algeria 14 January 1992
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
[45]
Flag of Angola.svg  Angola 30 October 1990
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
[46]
Flag of Antigua and Barbuda.svg  Antigua and Barbuda 1 February 1989
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
Implicit on succession. [Note 1]
Succeeded from the United Kingdom.
Flag of Argentina.svg  Argentina 8 May 1969
Flag of Armenia.svg  Armenia 13 March 2018
Flag of Australia (converted).svg  Australia 22 January 1930
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
Withdrawn in 1986. [47]
Flag of Austria.svg  Austria 17 June 19259 May 1928
Flag of Bahrain.svg  Bahrain 9 November 1988
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
[Reservation 3]
[48]
Flag of Bangladesh.svg  Bangladesh 20 May 1989
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
[49]
Flag of Barbados.svg  Barbados 16 July 1976
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
Withdrew the reservations made by the United Kingdom on succession. [50]
Succeeded from the United Kingdom.
Flag of Belgium (civil).svg  Belgium 17 June 19254 December 1928
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
Withdrawn in 1997. [51]
Flag of Benin.svg  Benin 4 December 1986
Flag of Bhutan.svg  Bhutan 12 June 1978
Flag of Bolivia.svg  Bolivia 14 January 1985
Flag of Brazil.svg  Brazil 17 June 192528 August 1970
Flag of Bulgaria.svg  Bulgaria 17 June 19257 March 1934
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
Withdrawn in 1991. [52]
Flag of Burkina Faso.svg  Burkina Faso 1 March 1971Ratified as the Republic of Upper Volta.
Flag of Cambodia.svg  Cambodia 15 March 1983 [Reservation 2] The Protocol was ratified by the Coalition Government of Democratic Kampuchea in exile in 1983. 13 states (including the depositary France) objected to their ratification, and considered it legally invalid. In 1993, the Kingdom of Cambodia stated in a note verbale that it considered itself bound by the provisions of the Protocol. [53]
Flag of Cameroon.svg  Cameroon 21 April 1989
Flag of Canada (Pantone).svg  Canada 17 June 19256 May 1930
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
Withdrawn in 1991 as regards bacteriological agents, and completely withdrawn in 1999. [54]
Flag of Cape Verde.svg  Cape Verde 20 May 1991
Flag of the Central African Republic.svg  Central African Republic 30 July 1970
Flag of Chile.svg  Chile 17 June 19252 July 1935
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
Withdrawn in 1991. [55]
Flag of the People's Republic of China.svg  China 7 August 1929
[Reservation 2] Made on succession. [56]
Ratified as the Republic of China, from which the People's Republic of China succeeded on 13 July 1952. [56]
Flag of Colombia.svg  Colombia 24 November 2015
Flag of Costa Rica.svg  Costa Rica 17 June 2009
Flag of Cote d'Ivoire.svg  Côte d'Ivoire 27 July 1970
Flag of Croatia.svg  Croatia 25 September 2006
Flag of Cuba.svg  Cuba 24 May 1966
Flag of Cyprus.svg  Cyprus 29 November 1966
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
Implicit on succession. [Note 1]
Succeeded from the United Kingdom.
Flag of the Czech Republic.svg  Czech Republic 19 September 1993
[Reservation 2] Withdrawn prior to succession.
Succeeded from Czechoslovakia, which ratified the protocol on 16 August 1938.
Flag of Denmark.svg  Denmark 17 June 19255 May 1930
Flag of the Dominican Republic.svg  Dominican Republic 4 December 1970
Flag of Ecuador.svg  Ecuador 10 September 1970
Flag of Egypt.svg  Egypt 17 June 19256 December 1928
Flag of El Salvador.svg  El Salvador 17 June 192512 January 2010
Flag of Equatorial Guinea.svg  Equatorial Guinea 16 May 1989
Flag of Estonia.svg  Estonia 17 June 192528 August 1931
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
Withdrawn in 1999. [57]
Flag of Eswatini.svg  Eswatini 10 July 1991
Flag of Ethiopia.svg  Ethiopia 17 June 19257 October 1935
Flag of Fiji.svg  Fiji 21 March 1973
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
Retained the United Kingdom's reservations on succession. [58]
Succeeded from the United Kingdom.
Flag of Finland.svg  Finland 17 June 192526 June 1929
Flag of France.svg  France 17 June 192510 May 1926
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
Withdrawn in 1996. [59]
Flag of The Gambia.svg  Gambia 5 November 1966
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
Implicit on succession. [Note 1]
Succeeded from the United Kingdom.
Flag of Germany.svg  Germany 17 June 192525 April 1929
Flag of Ghana.svg  Ghana 2 May 1967
Flag of Greece.svg  Greece 17 June 192530 May 1931
Flag of Grenada.svg  Grenada 3 January 1989
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
Implicit on succession. [Note 1]
Succeeded from the United Kingdom.
Flag of Guatemala.svg  Guatemala 3 May 1983
Flag of Guinea-Bissau.svg  Guinea-Bissau 20 May 1989
Flag of the Vatican City - 2001 version.svg  Holy See 12 October 1966
Flag of Hungary.svg  Hungary 17 June 192511 October 1952
Flag of Iceland.svg  Iceland 19 December 1966
Flag of India.svg  India 17 June 19259 April 1930
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
[60]
Flag of Indonesia.svg  Indonesia 14 January 1971
[Reservation 4] Implicit on succession. [Note 1]
Succeeded from the Netherlands.
Flag of Iran.svg  Iran 4 July 1929
Flag of Iraq.svg  Iraq 18 August 1931
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
[61]
Flag of Ireland.svg  Ireland 18 August 1930
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
Withdrawn in 1972. [62]
Flag of Israel.svg  Israel 10 February 1969
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
[63]
Flag of Italy.svg  Italy 17 June 19253 April 1928
Flag of Jamaica.svg  Jamaica 28 July 1970
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
Implicit on succession. [Note 1]
Succeeded from the United Kingdom.
Flag of Japan.svg  Japan 17 June 192521 May 1970
Flag of Jordan.svg  Jordan 20 January 1977
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
[Reservation 3]
[64]
Flag of Kazakhstan.svg  Kazakhstan 20 April 2020
Flag of Kenya.svg  Kenya 17 June 1970
Flag of North Korea.svg  Korea, Democratic People's Republic of 22 December 1988
[Reservation 2] [65]
Flag of South Korea.svg  Korea, Republic of 29 December 1988
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
Reservation 2 withdrawn in 2002 as regards biological agents covered by the BWC.
Flag of Kuwait.svg  Kuwait 15 December 1971
[Reservation 3]
[Reservation 5]
[66]
Flag of Kyrgyzstan.svg  Kyrgyzstan 29 June 2020
Flag of Laos.svg  Laos 16 January 1989
Flag of Latvia.svg  Latvia 17 June 19253 June 1931
Flag of Lebanon.svg  Lebanon 15 April 1969
Flag of Lesotho.svg  Lesotho 10 March 1972
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
Implicit on succession. [Note 1]
Succeeded from the United Kingdom.
Flag of Liberia.svg  Liberia 2 April 1927
Flag of Libya.svg  Libya 21 December 1971
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
[Reservation 3]
[67]
Flag of Liechtenstein.svg  Liechtenstein 16 May 1991
Flag of Lithuania.svg  Lithuania 17 June 192515 June 1933
Flag of Luxembourg.svg  Luxembourg 17 June 19251 September 1936
Flag of North Macedonia.svg  North Macedonia 20 August 2015
Flag of Madagascar.svg  Madagascar 2 August 1967
Flag of Malawi.svg  Malawi 4 September 1970
Flag of Malaysia.svg  Malaysia 7 December 1970
Flag of Maldives.svg  Maldives 27 December 1966
Flag of Malta.svg  Malta 9 October 1970
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
Implicit on succession. [Note 1]
Succeeded from the United Kingdom.
Flag of Mauritius.svg  Mauritius 23 December 1970
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
Implicit on succession. [Note 1]
Succeeded from the United Kingdom.
Flag of Mexico.svg  Mexico 28 March 1932
Flag of Moldova.svg  Moldova 14 January 2011
Flag of Monaco.svg  Monaco 15 December 1966
Flag of Mongolia.svg  Mongolia 18 November 1968
[Reservation 2] Withdrawn in 1990. [68]
Flag of Morocco.svg  Morocco 7 October 1970
Flag of Nepal.svg    Nepal 7 May 1969
Flag of the Netherlands.svg  Netherlands 17 June 192531 October 1930
[Reservation 4] Withdrawn in 1995. [69]
Flag of New Zealand.svg  New Zealand 22 January 1930
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
Withdrawn in 1989. [70]
Flag of Nicaragua.svg  Nicaragua 17 June 19255 October 1990
Flag of Niger.svg  Niger 5 April 1967
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
Implicit on succession. [Note 1]
Succeeded from France.
Flag of Nigeria.svg  Nigeria 9 October 1968
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
[71]
Flag of Norway.svg  Norway 17 June 192527 July 1932
Flag of Pakistan.svg  Pakistan 15 April 1960
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
Implicit on succession. [Note 1]
Succeeded from India.
Flag of Palestine.svg  Palestine 19 January 2018
Flag of Panama.svg  Panama 26 November 1970
Flag of Papua New Guinea.svg  Papua New Guinea 2 September 1980
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
Retained Australia's reservations on succession. [72]
Succeeded from Australia.
Flag of Paraguay.svg  Paraguay 22 October 1933
Flag of Peru.svg  Peru 5 June 1985
Flag of the Philippines.svg  Philippines 29 May 1973
Flag of Poland.svg  Poland 17 June 19254 February 1929
Flag of Portugal.svg  Portugal 17 June 19251 July 1930
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
Reservation 2 withdrawn in 2003, and reservation 1 withdrawn in 2014.
Flag of Qatar.svg  Qatar 16 September 1976
Flag of Romania.svg  Romania 17 June 192523 August 1929
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
Withdrawn in 1991. [73]
Flag of Russia.svg  Russia 17 June 19255 April 1928
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
Withdrawn in 2001. [74]
Ratified as the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.
Flag of Rwanda.svg  Rwanda 21 March 1964
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
Implicit on succession. [Note 1]
Succeeded from Belgium.
Flag of Saint Kitts and Nevis.svg  Saint Kitts and Nevis 26 October 1989
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
Implicit on succession. [Note 1]
Succeeded from the United Kingdom.
Flag of Saint Lucia.svg  Saint Lucia 21 December 1988
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
Implicit on succession. [Note 1]
Succeeded from the United Kingdom.
Flag of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.svg  Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 23 April 1999
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
Implicit on succession. [Note 1]
Succeeded from the United Kingdom.
Flag of Saudi Arabia.svg  Saudi Arabia 27 January 1971
Flag of Senegal.svg  Senegal 15 June 1977
Flag of Serbia.svg  Serbia 20 January 2003
[Reservation 2] Implicit on succession. [Note 1] Serbia's Parliament voted to withdraw their reservation in May 2009 [75] and the withdrawal was announced in 2010, but the depositary has not been notified. [76]
Succeeded as the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia from the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, [Note 2] which had ratified the protocol as the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes on 12 April 1929.
Flag of Sierra Leone.svg  Sierra Leone 20 February 1967
Flag of Slovakia.svg  Slovakia 1 July 1997 [Note 3]
[Reservation 2] Withdrawn prior to succession.
Succeeded from Czechoslovakia, which ratified the protocol on 16 August 1938.
Flag of Slovenia.svg  Slovenia 8 April 2008
Flag of the Solomon Islands.svg  Solomon Islands 1 June 1981
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
Retained the United Kingdom's reservations on succession. [78]
Succeeded from the United Kingdom.
Flag of South Africa.svg  South Africa 24 May 1930
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
Withdrawn in 1996. [79]
Flag of Spain.svg  Spain 17 June 192522 August 1929
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
Withdrawn in 1992. [80]
Flag of Sri Lanka.svg  Sri Lanka 20 January 1954Ratified as the Dominion of Ceylon.
Flag of Sudan.svg  Sudan 17 December 1980
Flag of Sweden.svg  Sweden 17 June 192525 April 1930
Flag of Switzerland (Pantone).svg   Switzerland 17 June 192512 July 1932
Flag of Syria.svg  Syria 17 December 1968
[Reservation 3] [81]
Flag of Tajikistan.svg  Tajikistan 15 November 2019
Flag of Tanzania.svg  Tanzania 28 February 1963Ratified as the Republic of Tanganyika.
Flag of Thailand.svg  Thailand 17 June 19256 June 1931 [Note 4] Ratified as Siam.
Flag of Togo (3-2).svg  Togo 18 November 1970
Flag of Tonga.svg  Tonga 19 July 1971
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
Implicit on succession. [Note 1]
Succeeded from the United Kingdom.
Flag of Trinidad and Tobago.svg  Trinidad and Tobago 24 November 1970
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
Implicit on succession. [Note 1]
Succeeded from the United Kingdom.
Flag of Tunisia.svg  Tunisia 12 July 1967
Flag of Turkey.svg  Turkey 17 June 19255 October 1929
Flag of Uganda.svg  Uganda 2 April 1965
Flag of Ukraine.svg  Ukraine 7 August 2003
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
Implicit on succession. [Note 1]
Succeeded from the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.
Flag of the United Kingdom.svg  United Kingdom 17 June 19259 April 1930
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
Reservation 2 withdrawn in 1991 as regards biological agents covered by the BWC, and reservations completely withdrawn in 2002. [83]
Flag of the United States.svg  United States of America 17 June 192510 April 1975
[Reservation 4] [84]
Flag of Uruguay.svg  Uruguay 17 June 192512 April 1977
Flag of Uzbekistan.svg  Uzbekistan 5 October 2020
Flag of Venezuela.svg  Venezuela 17 June 19258 February 1928
Flag of Vietnam.svg  Vietnam 15 December 1980
[Reservation 1]
[Reservation 2]
[85]
Flag of Yemen.svg  Yemen 11 March 1971
[Reservation 3] Made in a second instrument of accession submitted on 16 September 1973. [Note 5]
Ratified as the Yemen Arab Republic. Also ratified by the People's Democratic Republic of Yemen on 20 October 1986, prior to Yemeni unification in 1990. [86]
  Parties with withdrawn reservations
  Parties with implicit reservations
  Parties with unwithdrawn reservations limiting the applicability of provisions of the Protocol
Reservations
  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Does not constitute recognition of, or establishing any relations with, Israel.
  4. 1 2 3 Ceases to be binding as to the use of chemical weapons in regards to any enemy state which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
  5. Ceases to be binding in the case of a violation.
Notes
  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 According to the Vienna Convention on Succession of States in respect of Treaties, states which succeed to a treaty after gaining independence from a state party "shall be considered as maintaining any reservation to that treaty which was applicable at the date of the succession of States in respect of the territory to which the succession of States relates unless, when making the notification of succession, it expresses a contrary intention or formulates a reservation which relates to the same subject matter as that reservation." Any state which has not clarified their position on reservations inherited on succession are listed as "implicit" reservations.
  2. Although the FR Yugoslavia claimed to be the continuator state of the SFR of Yugoslavia, the United Nations General Assembly did not accept this and forced them to reapply for membership.
  3. Listed as 28 October 1997 by the United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. [77]
  4. Some sources list two reservations by Thailand, but neither the instrument of accession, [1] nor the United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs list, [82] makes any mention of a reservation.
  5. According to the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, states may make a reservation when "signing, ratifying, accepting, approving or acceding to a treaty".

Non-signatory states

The remaining UN member states and UN observers that have not acceded or succeeded to the Protocol are:

Chemical weapons prohibitions

YearNameEffect
1675 Strasbourg Agreement The first international agreement limiting the use of chemical weapons, in this case, poison bullets.
1874 Brussels Convention on the Law and Customs of War Prohibited the employment of poison or poisoned weapons (Never entered into force.)
1899 1st Peace Conference at the Hague Signatories agreed to abstain from "the use of projectiles the object of which is the diffusion of asphyxiating or deleterious gases."
1907 2nd Peace Conference at the Hague The Conference added the use of poison or poisoned weapons.
1919 Treaty of Versailles Prohibited poison gas in Germany.
1922 Treaty relating to the Use of Submarines and Noxious Gases in Warfare Failed because France objected to clauses relating to submarine warfare.
1925Geneva ProtocolProhibited the "use in war of asphyxiating, poisonous or other gases, and of all analogous liquids, materials or devices" and "bacteriological methods" in international conflicts.
1972 Biological and Toxins Weapons Convention No verification mechanism, negotiations for a protocol to make up this lack halted by USA in 2001.
1993 Chemical Weapons Convention Comprehensive bans on development, production, stockpiling and use of chemical weapons, with destruction timelines.
1998 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court Makes it a war crime to employ chemical weapons in international conflicts. (2010 amendment extends prohibition to internal conflicts.)

Related Research Articles

Arms control is a term for international restrictions upon the development, production, stockpiling, proliferation and usage of small arms, conventional weapons, and weapons of mass destruction. Historically, arms control may apply to melee weapons before the invention of firearm. Arms control is typically exercised through the use of diplomacy which seeks to impose such limitations upon consenting participants through international treaties and agreements, although it may also comprise efforts by a nation or group of nations to enforce limitations upon a non-consenting country.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chemical warfare</span> Using poison gas or other toxins in war

Chemical warfare (CW) involves using the toxic properties of chemical substances as weapons. This type of warfare is distinct from nuclear warfare, biological warfare and radiological warfare, which together make up CBRN, the military acronym for chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear, all of which are considered "weapons of mass destruction" (WMDs), a term that contrasts with conventional weapons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chemical Weapons Convention</span> Multilateral treaty prohibiting the production, stockpiling, and use of chemical weapons

The Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), officially the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on their Destruction, is an arms control treaty administered by the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), an intergovernmental organization based in The Hague, The Netherlands. The treaty entered into force on 29 April 1997. It prohibits the use of chemical weapons, and also prohibits large-scale development, production, stockpiling, or transfer of chemical weapons or their precursors, except for very limited purposes. The main obligation of member states under the convention is to effect this prohibition, as well as the destruction of all current chemical weapons. All destruction activities must take place under OPCW verification.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Weapon of mass destruction</span> Weapon that can kill many people or cause great damage

A weapon of mass destruction (WMD) is a biological, chemical, radiological, nuclear, or any other weapon that can kill or significantly harm many people or cause great damage to artificial structures, natural structures, or the biosphere. The scope and usage of the term has evolved and been disputed, often signifying more politically than technically. Originally coined in reference to aerial bombing with chemical explosives during World War II, it has later come to refer to large-scale weaponry of warfare-related technologies, such as biological, chemical, radiological, or nuclear warfare.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Law of war</span> International regulations of warfare

The law of war is a component of international law that regulates the conditions for initiating war and the conduct of hostilities. Laws of war define sovereignty and nationhood, states and territories, occupation, and other critical terms of law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chemical weapons in World War I</span>

The use of toxic chemicals as weapons dates back thousands of years, but the first large-scale use of chemical weapons was during World War I. They were primarily used to demoralize, injure, and kill entrenched defenders, against whom the indiscriminate and generally very slow-moving or static nature of gas clouds would be most effective. The types of weapons employed ranged from disabling chemicals, such as tear gas, to lethal agents like phosgene, chlorine, and mustard gas. These chemical weapons caused medical problems. This chemical warfare was a major component of the first global war and first total war of the 20th century. The killing capacity of gas was profound, with about 90,000 fatalities from a total of 1.3 million casualties caused by gas attacks. Gas was unlike most other weapons of the period because it was possible to develop countermeasures, such as gas masks. In the later stages of the war, as the use of gas increased, its overall effectiveness diminished. The widespread use of these agents of chemical warfare, and wartime advances in the composition of high explosives, gave rise to an occasionally expressed view of World War I as "the chemist's war" and also the era where weapons of mass destruction were created.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Biological Weapons Convention</span> 1975 treaty that comprehensively bans biological weapons

The Biological Weapons Convention (BWC), or Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC), is a disarmament treaty that effectively bans biological and toxin weapons by prohibiting their development, production, acquisition, transfer, stockpiling and use. The treaty's full name is the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on their Destruction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907</span> Treaties on the laws of war

The Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907 are a series of international treaties and declarations negotiated at two international peace conferences at The Hague in the Netherlands. Along with the Geneva Conventions, the Hague Conventions were among the first formal statements of the laws of war and war crimes in the body of secular international law. A third conference was planned for 1914 and later rescheduled for 1915, but it did not take place because of the start of World War I.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Seabed Arms Control Treaty</span> 1971 international agreement limiting nuclear weapons on the sea floor

The Seabed Arms Control Treaty is a multilateral agreement between the United States, Soviet Union, United Kingdom, and 91 other countries banning the emplacement of nuclear weapons or "weapons of mass destruction" on the ocean floor beyond a 12-mile (22.2 km) coastal zone. It allows signatories to observe all seabed "activities" of any other signatory beyond the 12-mile zone to ensure compliance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Biological agent</span> Pathogen that can be weaponized

Biological agents, also known as biological weapons, are pathogens used as weapons. In addition to these living or replicating pathogens, toxins and biotoxins are also included among the bio-agents. More than 1,200 different kinds of potentially weaponizable bio-agents have been described and studied to date.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Musha Incident</span> 1930 uprising in Japanese Taiwan

The Musha Incident (Chinese and Japanese: 霧社事件; pinyin: Wùshè Shìjiàn; Wade–Giles: Wu4-she4 Shih4-chien4; rōmaji: Musha Jiken; Pe̍h-ōe-jī: Bū-siā Sū-kiāⁿ), also known as the Wushe Rebellion and several other similar names, began in October 1930 and was the last major uprising against colonial Japanese forces in Japanese Taiwan. In response to long-term oppression by Japanese authorities, the Seediq indigenous group in the settlement of Musha (Wushe) attacked a school, killing 134 Japanese and two Han Taiwanese children. In response, the Japanese led a counter-attack, killing 354 Seediq in retaliation. The handling of the incident by the Japanese authorities was strongly criticised, leading to many changes in Aboriginal policy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Germany and weapons of mass destruction</span>

Although Germany has the technical capability to produce weapons of mass destruction (WMD), since World War II it has refrained from producing those weapons. However, Germany participates in the NATO nuclear weapons sharing arrangements and trains for delivering United States nuclear weapons. Officially, 20 US-nuclear weapons are stationed in Büchel, Germany. It could be more or fewer, but the exact number of the weapons is a state secret.

The Strasbourg Agreement of 27 August 1675 is the first international agreement banning the use of chemical weapons. The treaty was signed between France and the Holy Roman Empire, and was created in response to the use of poisoned bullets. The use of this weaponry was preceded by Leonardo da Vinci's invention of arsenic and sulfur-packed shells that can be fired against ships. These weapons had been used by Christoph Bernhard von Galen, Bishop of Munster, in the Siege of Groningen (1672) - thus provoking the Strasbourg Agreement between the belligerents of the Franco-Dutch War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chemical weapon</span> Device that uses chemicals to kill or harm individuals

A chemical weapon (CW) is a specialized munition that uses chemicals formulated to inflict death or harm on humans. According to the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), this can be any chemical compound intended as a weapon "or its precursor that can cause death, injury, temporary incapacitation or sensory irritation through its chemical action. Munitions or other delivery devices designed to deliver chemical weapons, whether filled or unfilled, are also considered weapons themselves."

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 "Protocole concernant la prohibition d'emploi à la guerre de gaz asphyxiants, toxiques ou similaires et de moyens bactériologiques, fait à Genève le 17 juin 1925" (in French). Ministry of Foreign and European Affairs of France. Archived from the original on 2 December 2008. Retrieved 23 July 2013.
  2. Chemical Weapons Convention, Article 21.
  3. 1 2 3 "Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved 24 July 2013.
  4. League of Nations Treaty Series, vol. 94, pp. 66–74.
  5. "Disarmament Treaties Database: 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved 9 February 2021.
  6. 1 2 Beard, J. (2007). "The Shortcomings of Indeterminacy in Arms Control Regimes: The Case of the Biological Weapons Convention". American Journal of International Law. 101(2): 271–321. doi:10.1017/S0002930000030098. p., 277
  7. Haber, L. F. (2002). The Poisonous Cloud: Chemical warfare in the First World War. pp. 239–253. ISBN   9780191512315.
  8. 1 2 "Treaty relating to the Use of Submarines and Noxious Gases in Warfare. Washington, 6 February 1922". International Committee of the Red Cross. 2012. Retrieved 30 April 2013.
  9. "The Geneva Protocol at 90, Part 1: Discovery of the dual-use dilemma - The Trench - Jean Pascal Zanders". 17 June 2015.
  10. 1 2 3 Eric A. Croddy, James J. Wirtz (2005). Weapons of Mass Destruction: An Encyclopedia of Worldwide Policy, Technology and History, Volume 1. ABC-CLIO. pp. 140–142. ISBN   978-1851094905 . Retrieved 28 April 2013.
  11. Pascal Daudin (June 2023). "The Rif War: A forgotten war?". International Review of the Red Cross.
  12. Noguer, Miquel (2 July 2005). "ERC exige que España pida perdón por el uso de armas químicas en la guerra del Rif". El País (in Spanish). ISSN   1134-6582 . Retrieved 6 January 2023.
  13. "Geneva Protocol: Protocol For the Prohibition of the Use In War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous, or Other Gases, And of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare (Geneva Protocol)". Nuclear Threat Initiative.
  14. 1 2 3 4 5 Bunn, George (1969). "Banning Poison Gas and Germ Warfare: Should the United States Agree" (PDF). Wisconsin Law Review . 1969 (2): 375–420. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 July 2014. Retrieved 5 August 2013.
  15. Israelyan, Victor (1 November 2010). On the Battlefields of the Cold War: A Soviet Ambassador's Confession. Penn State Press. p. 339. ISBN   978-0271047737.
  16. Merridale, Catherine, Ivan's War, Faber & Faber: pp. 148–150.
  17. Fassihi, Farnaz (27 October 2002), "In Iran, grim reminders of Saddam's arsenal", New Jersey Star Ledger, archived from the original on 13 December 2007, retrieved 27 July 2023
  18. Paul Hughes (21 January 2003), "It's like a knife stabbing into me", The Star (South Africa)
  19. Sciolino, Elaine (13 February 2003), "Iraq Chemical Arms Condemned, but West Once Looked the Other Way", The New York Times , archived from the original on 27 May 2013
  20. "2603 (XXIV). Question of chemical and bacteriological (biological) weapons" (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 16 December 1969. Retrieved 24 August 2013. use in international armed conflicts of: (a) Any chemical agents of warfare - chemical substances, whether gaseous, liquid or solid - which might be employed because of their direct toxic effects on man, animals or plants; (b) Any biological agents of warfare - living organisms, whatever their nature, or infective material derived from them - which are intended to cause disease or death in man, animals or plants, and which depend for their effects on their ability to multiply in the person, animal or plant attacked.
  21. Angela Woodward (17 May 2012). "The 1925 Geneva Protocol goes digital". VERTIC . Retrieved 26 August 2013.
  22. "Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare (Geneva Protocol)". U.S. Department of State. 25 September 2002. Retrieved 24 August 2013.
  23. "Practice Relating to Rule 76. Herbicides". International Committee of the Red Cross. 2013. Retrieved 24 August 2013.
  24. "Practice Relating to Rule 75. Riot Control Agents". International Committee of the Red Cross. 2013. Retrieved 24 August 2013.
  25. Scott Spence and Meghan Brown (8 August 2012). "Syria: international law and the use of chemical weapons". VERTIC. Archived from the original on 26 September 2013. Retrieved 26 August 2013.
  26. Jillian Blake & Aqsa Mahmud (15 October 2013). "A Legal "Red Line"? Syria and the Use of Chemical Weapons in Civil Conflict". UCLA Law Review.
  27. Anne Lorenzat (2017–2018). "The Current State of Customary International Law with regard to the Use of Chemical Weapons in Non-International Armed Conflicts". The Military Law and the Law of War Review.
  28. "Czech Republic: Succession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved 26 July 2014.
  29. Kelly, David (2002). "The Trilateral Agreement: lessons for biological weapons verification]" (PDF). In Findlay, Trevor; Meier, Oliver (eds.). Verification Yearbook 2002 (PDF). London: Verification Research, Training and Information Centre (VERTIC). pp. 93–109. ISBN   978-1-899548-35-4.
  30. "Le traité international en detail". Federal Department of Foreign Affairs of Switzerland . Retrieved 21 May 2018.
  31. 1 2 "Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare (Geneva Protocol)". United States Department of State . Retrieved 31 July 2013.
  32. 1 2 "Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare. Geneva, 17 June 1925". International Committee of the Red Cross. Retrieved 31 July 2013.
  33. "States parties to the Protocol for the prohibition of the use in war of asphyxiating, poisonous or other gases, and of bacteriological methods of warfare, Done at Geneva 17 June 1925". University of Illinois at Chicago. Archived from the original on 7 April 2015. Retrieved 5 August 2013.
  34. "Protocol for the prohibition of the use in war of asphyxiating, poisonous or other gases, and of bacteriological methods of warfare". United Nations Treaty Series . Retrieved 5 August 2013.
  35. "Protocol for the prohibition of the use in war of asphyxiating, poisonous or other gases, and of bacteriological methods of warfare". Federation of American Scientists . Retrieved 5 August 2013.
  36. "Protocole concernant la prohibition d'emploi à la guerre de gaz asphyxiants, toxiques ou similaires et de moyens bactériologiques". Government of Switzerland. 15 August 2013. Retrieved 13 July 2014.
  37. "Protocole du 17 juin 1925 concernant la prohibition d'emploi à la guerre de gaz asphyxiants, toxiques ou similaires et de moyens bactériologiques" (PDF). Government of Switzerland. 2004. Retrieved 13 July 2014.
  38. "Protocole concernant la prohibition d'emploi à la guerre de gaz asphyxiants, toxiques ou similaires et de moyens bactériologiques" (PDF). Government of Switzerland. 15 August 2013. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 May 2018. Retrieved 13 July 2014.
  39. "No. 2138 - Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare. Signed at Geneva, 17 June 1925" (PDF). League of Nations Treaty Series - Publication of Treaties and International Engagements Registered with the Secretariat of the League of Nations. XCIV (1, 2, 3 and 4). League of Nations: 65–74. 1929. Retrieved 28 July 2013.
  40. "Seventh BWC Review Conference Briefing Book" (PDF). Biological Weapons Convention. 2011. Retrieved 17 November 2014.
  41. "High Contracting Parties to the Geneva Protocol". SIPRI . Retrieved 5 August 2013.
  42. Schindler, Dietrich; Toman, Jiří (1988). The Laws of Armed Conflicts: A Collection of Conventions, Resolutions, and Other Documents. Brill Publishers. pp. 115–127. ISBN   9024733065 . Retrieved 5 August 2013.
  43. "Geneva Protocol reservations" (PDF). Biological Weapons Convention Review Conference. Retrieved 5 August 2013.
  44. Papanicolopulu, Irini; Scovazzi, Tullio, eds. (2006). Quale diritto nei conflitti armati? (in Italian). Giuffrè Editore. pp. 231–237. ISBN   9788814130625 . Retrieved 5 August 2013.
  45. "Algeria: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved 27 July 2013.
  46. "Angola: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved 27 July 2013.
  47. "Australia: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved 20 September 2014.
  48. "Bahrain: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved 27 July 2013.
  49. "Bangladesh: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved 27 July 2013.
  50. "Barbados: Succession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved 27 July 2013.
  51. "Belgium: Ratification of 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved 27 July 2013.
  52. "Bulgaria: Ratification of 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved 28 July 2013.
  53. "Cambodia: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved 28 July 2013.
  54. "Canada: Ratification of 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved 28 July 2013.
  55. "Chile: Ratification of 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved 28 July 2013.
  56. 1 2 "China: Succession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved 28 July 2013.
  57. "Estonia: Ratification of 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved 28 July 2013.
  58. "Fiji: Succession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved 28 July 2013.
  59. "France: Ratification of 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved 28 July 2013.
  60. "India: Ratification of 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved 28 July 2013.
  61. "Iraq: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved 28 July 2013.
  62. "Ireland: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved 28 July 2013.
  63. "Israel: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved 28 July 2013.
  64. "Jordan: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved 28 July 2013.
  65. "Democratic People's Republic of Korea: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved 29 August 2017.
  66. "Kuwait: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved 28 July 2013.
  67. "Libya: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved 28 July 2013.
  68. "Mongolia: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved 28 July 2013.
  69. "Netherlands: Ratification of 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved 28 July 2013.
  70. "New Zealand: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved 29 July 2013.
  71. "Nigeria: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved 29 July 2013.
  72. "Papua New Guinea: Succession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved 31 July 2013.
  73. "Romania: Ratification of 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved 31 July 2013.
  74. "Russian Federation: Ratification of 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved 31 July 2013.
  75. "Seventh Review Conference of Biological Weapons Convention" (PDF). 5 December 2011. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 10 November 2013.
  76. Sims, Nicholas; Pearson, Graham; Woodward, Angela. "Article VII: Geneva Protocol Obligations and the BTWC" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 September 2015. Retrieved 10 August 2013.
  77. "Slovakia: Succession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved 31 July 2013.
  78. "Solomon Islands: Succession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved 31 July 2013.
  79. "South Africa: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved 31 July 2013.
  80. "Spain: Ratification of 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved 31 July 2013.
  81. "Syrian Arab Republic: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved 31 July 2013.
  82. "Thailand: Ratification of 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved 31 July 2013.
  83. "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Ratification of 1925 Geneva". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved 31 July 2013.
  84. "United States of America: Ratification of 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved 31 July 2013.
  85. "Viet Nam: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved 31 July 2013.
  86. "Yemen: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs . Retrieved 31 July 2013.

Further reading