Axis of Upheaval

Last updated
.mw-parser-output .legend{page-break-inside:avoid;break-inside:avoid-column}.mw-parser-output .legend-color{display:inline-block;min-width:1.25em;height:1.25em;line-height:1.25;margin:1px 0;text-align:center;border:1px solid black;background-color:transparent;color:black}.mw-parser-output .legend-text{} Axis of Upheaval (Russia, China, Iran, North Korea) Axis of Upheaval map.svg
  Axis of Upheaval (Russia, China, Iran, North Korea)

"Axis of Upheaval" is a term coined in 2024 by Center for a New American Security foreign policy analysts Richard Fontaine and Andrea Kendall-Taylor and used by many foreign policy analysts, [1] [2] [3] military officials, [4] [5] and international groups [6] to describe the growing anti-Western collaboration between the Russian Federation, the Islamic Republic of Iran, the People's Republic of China (PRC) [a] , and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) [b] beginning in the early 2020s. It has also been called the "axis of autocracies", [7] [8] [9] the "deadly quartet", [4] or " CRINK ". [10] [c]

Contents

The loose alliance generally represented itself in diplomatic addresses and public statements as an "anti-hegemony" and "anti-imperialist" coalition with intentions to challenge what it deemed to be a Western-dominated global order to reshape international relations into a multipolar order according to their shared interests. While not a formal bloc, these nations have increasingly coordinated their economic, military, and diplomatic efforts, making strong efforts to aid each other to undermine Western influence. [1]

Term

The "Axis of Upheaval" as a term was coined in the April 2024 article " The Axis of Upheaval " written by foreign policy analysts Richard Fontaine and Andrea Kendall-Taylor for the Foreign Affairs magazine, as part of the Center for a New American Security United States-based national security think tank. [1] Fontaine picked the phrase due to it representing the group of nations' shared disdain for and desire to uproot Western influence and values without using language that was "too overbearing", such as with the "Axis of Evil" or "axis of autocracy". [4]

NATO policy planning head Benedetta Berti expressed that she preferred to use the phrase "strategic convergence" instead of "axis" when describing the coalition of nations. [4]

Background

The roots of cooperation among nations in the axis stretch back decades during the onset of the Cold War, based on the divide between the First World and Second World. The Soviet Union represented the lead superpower of the latter, providing assistance to and sharing communist, anti-Western philosophies with the People's Republic of China and North Korea. [1]

While these nations have generally remained on neutral or good terms since the break-up of the Soviet Union, their alliance intensified significantly following Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Foreign policy analyst Andrea Kendall-Taylor stated that it seemed that Russian President Vladimir Putin misjudged the level of "extraordinary" Western coordination between the United States, Europe, and other West-friendly countries on economic sanctions and military aid to Ukraine. However, she expressed that the West's hardline and absolute response inadvertently served as a catalyst for Russia to accelerate pushing for closer economic and diplomatic ties with nations at odd with Western nations, due to it seemingly marking a "point of no return" for Russian–Western relations that increased Putin's determination to move past them. [1] [11]

In 2021, Clifford May described Russia, China and Iran as neo-imperialist powers who "seek to restore what they consider their rightful realms, and all see the U.S. as their biggest obstacle. It's on this basis that they now have a flourishing alliance". [12] Discussing Russian neo-imperialism in Ukraine, Orlando Figes wrote in 2022 that "we can see a new type of empire arising in Eurasia, uniting countries with historic grievances against the West". He said that "ideas of a nationalist, socially conservative, anti-Western and religious character ... underpin dictatorships in Russia, China, and Iran". [13]

Characteristics

While the Axis of Upheaval is not a formal union or alliance, it is generally united by a shared opposition to what it calls U.S. hegemony and the Western-led international order. The axis's countries have dramatically increased their economic and military cooperation while coordinating their diplomatic, information, and security efforts, operating as a loose coalition of like-minded states in resistance to economic or ideological pressure from Western nations. [1]

Anti-Westernism

The motivations driving the loose alliance are multi-faceted, but are primarily centered on a desire for greater regional influence and control away from Western powers' imperialism. The axis members reject Western-defined universal values and the "championing of its brand of democracy as an attempt to undermine their legitimacy and foment domestic instability". They view U.S. presence in their regions of influence as a threat to their interests and sovereignty, stating that they should hold the right to instate democracy based on their own institutions and culture instead of being forcibly shaped by Western principles. Collectively, they represent themselves as anti-imperialists sharing the goal of creating a multipolar world order that diminishes U.S. global dominance, which includes resisting "external meddling in their internal affairs, the expansion of U.S. alliances, the stationing of American nuclear weapons abroad, and the use of coercive sanctions". [11]

Autocracy and neo-imperialism

All four states have been described as autocratic or authoritarian with extensive state propaganda campaigns, [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] while Russia, China and Iran have also been described as neo-imperialist or expansionist [12] [16] [17] [19] (see Russian neo-imperialism and Chinese imperialism). In addition, North Korea is one of the few remaining personalist dictatorships with pervasive personality cults.

Economic cooperation

Economic ties among the axis members have strengthened considerably since 2022. Following an early 2022 signing of a joint agreement between President of China Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin establishing a "'no-limits' partnership", China has become Russia's largest trading partner, with bilateral trade reaching record levels in 2023 and 2024. In 2023, trade between Russia and China exceeded US$240 billion, with Russia replacing Saudi Arabia's petroleum trade as China's largest petroleum source. Iran and Russia have agreed to conduct trade in each other's national currencies to reduce each other's dependency on the U.S. dollar in international transactions. China has also increased its purchases of Russian oil and natural gas, providing a crucial economic "lifeline" to Russia's oil industry and economy in the face of pressure generated by wide-sweeping Western sanctions. Many of these trade agreements, alternative networks, and transactions across shared borders appeared to be set in place specifically in order to circumvent Western sanctions and trade restrictions. [1] [11]

For Iran, exports from Russia increased by 27% from January to October 2022. [11]

Russia also defied United Nations Security Council sanctions by unfreezing North Korean assets worth several millions in USD. [1]

Military cooperation

Military collaboration has also intensified between the four states, with Iran providing unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to Russia for use in Ukraine. From the beginning of Russia's invasion to the end of April 2024, Russia used ~3,700 drones designed by Iran in combat, and expressed plans to collaborate with Iran on constructing a Russian drone factory. Russia reciprocated the military assistance by granting Iran new air defense, intelligence and surveillance capabilities, modern aircraft, and cyber abilities. Russia has also provided Iran and Iranian proxies such as Hezbollah with more weapons, especially following the onset of the 2023 Israel–Hezbollah conflict. [1] [11]

While China has publicly avoided transferring weapons to Russia, it has exporting over US$300 million in dual-use items that can be used both by civilians and in the military if shipped components are put together or adapted for military use. Dual-use items exported to Russia from China include microchips, jamming equipment, telecommunications equipment, jet plane parts, sensors and radar, and machine tools, each of which helped to sustain its war effort and avert shortages caused by Western sanctions. [20] From 2018 to 2022, Russia supplied 83% of China's military arms imports. China's exports to Russia contributed to half of its growing supply of computer microchips and components, reaching levels close to where they were prior to the invasion. [11]

North Korea has supplied Russia with roughly 2.5 million ammunition rounds and ballistic missiles. [1] In October 2024, it was revealed North Korean started sent troops to Russia to support it's war in Ukraine. [21]

The four nations have also engaged in various kinds of joint military exercises, including naval exercises between China, Iran, and Russia in the Gulf of Oman over the past three years, and Russian-proposed naval exercises between it, North Korea, and China. [1]

Diplomatic cooperation

Diplomatic coordination among the axis members has become increasingly apparent, with each nation offering mutual support in international forums such as the United Nations. Russia and China have made efforts to legitimize Iran by including it in organizations such as BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. Their coordinated messaging on global issues frequently stood directly in opposition to Western and United States-led interpretations of world events, with a "shared purpose of overturning the principles, rules, and institutions that underlie the prevailing international system". [1]

In addition, Iran has conducted military drills with the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), further solidifying its strategic partnerships in the region. Furthermore, the establishment of free trade agreements between Iran and the Eurasian Economic Union has enhanced economic ties, allowing for deeper integration within the regional framework.

Russia has defended Hezbollah and other proxies of Iran during UN Security Council debates. Likewise, China has publicly released statements and made stances during international debates blaming NATO interference in Ukraine for starting the war. In addition, Russia, Iran, and China used their state media and social media to support Hamas, to justify actions taken by them, and to criticize Israel and the US following the October 2023 attack for their hypocritical roles in mass civilian attacks and humanitarian crises in the Gaza Strip. [11]

Impact

The rapid development of the Axis of Upheaval worked to undermine the effectiveness of Western sanctions and export controls such as those against Russia, eroded U.S. military advantages in key regions including the Middle East, and presented increased challenges to international norms and institutions. Moreover, the axis's actions have emboldened other anti-Western states and actors, contributing to a more unstable global environment. [1]

Foreign policy analyst Andrea Kendall-Taylor believed that the resulting influence of the axis of nations is pushing transformation of the current "international system" into one characterized by two increasingly organized orders with opposing values and regional interests, a shift she predicted is likely to give rise to greater global instability and initiation of conflict. She noted several instances of increasing worldwide conflict related to the coalition's cooperation. These included increased regional conflicts such as Azerbaijan's renewed invasion and reintegration of Nagorno-Karabakh, threats to Guyana from Venezuela, increasing tension between Kosovo and Serbia, and an increase in coups in several African nations including Niger and Burkina Faso. She predicted that opportunistic aggression, such as Russia attacking Europe while the United States is involved in a war against China, could be a future driver of worldwide conflict. [11]

Analysis

American diplomat and historian Philip Zelikow stated that the Axis of Upheaval represented the third time in recent history that the United States faced a "purposeful set of powerful adversaries in a rapidly changing and militarized period of history, short of all-out war." The prior instances included the Axis Powers of Fascist Italy, Nazi Germany, and Imperial Japan from 1937 to 1941, and the beginning of the Cold War against the Soviet Union and China from 1948 to 1962. He analyzed that the leaders of the current Axis of Upheaval share characteristics with leaders of these earlier periods such as Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, and Mao Zedong; viewing themselves as historical figures operating in isolated environments separate from dissenting views and pressures. He stated that this isolation shared by the four nations' leaders can lead to decisions that may seem irrational to outside observers, with autocratic state propaganda further censoring dissenting viewpoints while characterizing other international orders as existential threats to them and their culture that requires conflict and sacrifice to repel. [3]

Challenges

Despite their growing cooperation, historical distrust from prior events exist, such as the Soviet Union's 1941 invasion of Iran, China's apprehension to North Korea's militant aggression, and a border dispute between Russia and China that ended in 2004. Current competing interests between the nations include disputes between Russia and China over control in Central Asia and competition between Iran and Russia for Asian oil markets. Furthermore, the axis does not seem to have a coherent positive vision for a new global order, and its members remain economically interdependent with the West to varying degrees, making direct opposition to ultimatums issued more difficult to justify. [1]

Despite this, political scientist Hal Brands remarked that their alliance forged from their mutual disdain for the "existing order" resembled many of history's "most destructive alliances", which were made from rough agreements to band together against a greater opposing order or alliance with "little coordination and even less affection". [1]

Western response

In response to this emerging threat, Western nations, led by the United States, have increased their focus on countering the collective challenge posed by the axis, which involved efforts to strengthen existing alliances and partnerships. In 2024, NATO reaffirmed its security commitments in unstable regions such as in Southeast Asia, and called for increased defense spending and diplomatic engagement to match increased cooperation from potentially destabilizing unions. [1]

However, rising populism and political polarization in the European Union and the United States threaten to undermine unity in the alliance. [22]

Foreign policy analyst Andrea Kendall-Taylor argued that defeating Russia in Ukraine would be crucial to weakening the axis's ability to cause destabilization. She also believed that the US should not de-prioritize Russian aggression towards Ukraine and Europe while primarily focusing on China's South China Sea dispute due to both conflicts being connected by the axis. She stated that Europe needed to develop a stronger military and push for a greater emphasis on foreign policy so that the U.S. could address different global conflicts evenly without its resources and attention being stretched too thin. [11] General Sir Roly Walker corroborated these statements, stating that the United Kingdom needed to "double the lethality of its army" in three years to prepare for conflict with nations of the Axis of Upheaval. [5]

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ Commonly known as "China". Legitimacy disputed by the Taipei-based Republic of China (ROC), also called "Taiwan".
  2. ↑ Commonly known as "North Korea". Legitimacy disputed by the Seoul-based Republic of Korea (ROK), also called "South Korea".
  3. ↑ An acronym for China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea [10]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Foreign relations of Russia</span>

The foreign relations of the Russian Federation is the policy arm of the government of Russia which guides its interactions with other nations, their citizens, and foreign organizations. This article covers the foreign policy of the Russian Federation since the dissolution of the Soviet Union in late 1991. At present, Russia has no diplomatic relations with Ukraine due to its ongoing invasion of Ukraine. Other than Ukraine, Russia also has no diplomatic relations with Georgia, Bhutan, Federated States of Micronesia or Solomon Islands.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Axis of evil</span> American term for "sponsors of terrorism"

The phrase "axis of evil" was first used by U.S. President George W. Bush and originally referred to Iran, Ba'athist Iraq, and North Korea. It was used in Bush's State of the Union address on January 29, 2002, less than five months after the September 11 attacks and almost a year before the 2003 invasion of Iraq, and often repeated throughout his presidency. He used it to describe foreign governments that, during his administration, allegedly sponsored terrorism and sought weapons of mass destruction.

Economic sanctions or embargoes are commercial and financial penalties applied by states or institutions against states, groups, or individuals. Economic sanctions are a form of coercion that attempts to get an actor to change its behavior through disruption in economic exchange. Sanctions can be intended to compel or deterrence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Iran–Russia relations</span> Bilateral relations

Relations between the Grand Duchy of Moscow and the Persian Empire (Iran) officially commenced in 1521, with the Safavids in power. Past and present contact between Russia and Iran have long been complicatedly multi-faceted; often wavering between collaboration and rivalry. The two nations have a long history of geographic, economic, and socio-political interaction. Mutual relations have often been turbulent, and dormant at other times.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Russia–United States relations</span> Bilateral relations

The United States and Russia maintain one of the most important, critical, and strategic foreign relations in the world. Both nations have shared interests in nuclear safety and security, nonproliferation, counterterrorism, and space exploration.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Turkey–United States relations</span> Bilateral relations

The Republic of Türkiye and the United States of America established diplomatic relations in 1927. Relations after World War II evolved from the Second Cairo Conference in December 1943 and Turkey's entrance into World War II on the side of the Allies in February 1945. Later that year, Turkey became a charter member of the United Nations. Since 1945, both countries advanced ties under liberal international order, put forward by the US, through a set of global, rule-based, structured relationships based on political, and economic liberalism. As a consequence relationships advanced under G20, OECD, Council of Europe, OSCE, WTO, the Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council, IMF, the World Bank and Turkey in NATO.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Brazil–Russia relations</span> Bilateral relations

Brazil–Russia relations have seen significant improvement in recent years, characterized by increased commercial trades and cooperation in military and technology segments. The two countries maintain important partnerships in areas such as space, military technologies, and telecommunications.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">North Korea–Russia relations</span> Bilateral relations

The Soviet Union was the first to recognize North Korea on October 12, 1948, shortly after the proclamation, as the sole legitimate authority in all of Korea. The Soviet Union supported North Korea during the Korean War. North Korea was founded as part of the Communist bloc, and received major Soviet military and political support. The comprehensive personality cult around North Korea's ruling family was heavily influenced by Stalinism. China and the Soviet Union competed for influence in North Korea during the Sino-Soviet split in the 1960s, as North Korea tried to maintain good relations with both countries.

One of the main principles of Switzerland's foreign policy is that Switzerland is not to be involved in armed conflicts between other states. This policy is self-imposed and designed to ensure external security and promote peace.

The foreign policy of Vladimir Putin concerns the policies of the Russian Federation's president Vladimir Putin with respect to other nations. He has held the office of the President previously from 2000 to 2008, and reassumed power again in 2012 and has been President since.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">China–Russia relations</span> Bilateral relations

China and Russia established diplomatic relations after the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991.

The Halifax International Security Forum is an annual summit for international government and military officials, academic experts, authors and entrepreneurs, held in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. It is organized by HFX, an independent, nonpartisan, nonprofit organization headquartered in Washington, D.C. HFX addresses global security issues through various programs, with the Halifax International Security Forum serving as its flagship event. The 16th Halifax International Security Forum is scheduled for November 22-24, 2024.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Foreign relations of NATO</span> Overview of multilateral relations

NATO maintains foreign relations with many non-member countries across the globe. NATO runs a number of programs which provide a framework for the partnerships between itself and these non-member nations, typically based on that country's location. These include the Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council and the Partnership for Peace.

U.S. foreign policy during the presidency of Donald Trump (2017–2021) was noted for its unpredictability and reneging on prior international commitments, upending diplomatic conventions, embracing political and economic brinkmanship with most adversaries, and stronger relations with traditional allies. Trump's "America First" policy pursued nationalist foreign policy objectives and prioritized bilateral relations over multinational agreements. As president, Trump described himself as a nationalist while espousing views that have been characterized as isolationist, non-interventionist, and protectionist, although the "isolationist" label has been disputed, including by Trump himself, and periods of his political career have been described by the alternative term "semi-isolationist." He personally praised some populist, neo-nationalist, illiberal, and authoritarian governments, while antagonizing others, even as administration diplomats nominally continued to pursue pro-democracy ideals abroad.

The foreign policy of the Joe Biden administration emphasizes the repair of the United States' alliances, which Biden argues were damaged during the Trump administration. The administration's goal is to restore the United States to a "position of trusted leadership" among global democracies in order to address challenges posed by Russia and China. Both Biden and his Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin have repeatedly emphasized that no other world power should be able to surpass the United States, either militarily or economically. Biden's foreign policy has been described as having ideological underpinnings in mid-twentieth century liberal internationalism, American exceptionalism, and pragmatism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Government and intergovernmental reactions to the Russian invasion of Ukraine</span>

The Russian invasion of Ukraine received widespread international condemnation, leading to new sanctions being imposed on Russia, which triggered a Russian financial crisis. Reactions among governments have most often been negative, with criticism and condemnation, particularly in Europe, the Americas, and Southeast Asia.

After the Russian invasion of Ukraine, China stated that it respects Ukraine's sovereignty but Russia's concerns about enlargement of NATO should also be addressed. It abstained from United Nations votes that condemned the invasion. The Chinese government has attempted to mediate between the two countries, but its proposals have faced criticism. Although China objected to international sanctions against Russia, Chinese companies have largely complied with them. Drones made by Chinese manufacturers are used by both sides in the conflict. Exports of dual-use technology and component parts from China to Russia have drawn sanctions from the U.S. and condemnation from NATO and the European Union. Chinese state media outlets and netizens often gave more weight to Russian state views, sometimes reposting disinformation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2024 Washington summit</span> NATO diplomatic conference in Washington, DC

The 2024 Washington summit was the 33rd summit of the heads of state and government of the thirty-two members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), their partner countries and the European Union (EU), which took place in Washington, D.C., United States, on 9–11 July 2024. The summit commemorates the landmark 75th anniversary of NATO, which was founded on 4 April 1949 with the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty in Washington, DC. The summit was also the fourth NATO summit to be held in the United States following the 1978 Washington summit, 1999 Washington summit and 2012 Chicago summit. It also marks the first summit since Sweden acceded to NATO and the last for Jens Stoltenberg as Secretary General.

The NATO Washington Summit Declaration is a statement approved by all 32 member states of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) that was issued on 10 July 2024 by the national leaders that participated in the NATO 2024 Washington summit in Washington, D.C., in the United States. The declaration made frequent references to Russia's invasion of Ukraine, specifically dedicating six paragraphs assuring assistance to Ukraine for defense and security against Russia's impact on European stability. The Declaration was notable for its overt use of strong language condemning China's support of Russia during its invasion, referring to it as a "decisive enabler" of Russia's war crimes and breaches of international law by strengthening their mutual economic trade and political partnership. It also included several means of support and coordination with different NATO facilities and initiatives to promote Ukraine's security on its "irreversible path" to integration with European and Western nations, including eventual NATO accession.

CRINK is an acronym that stands for the authoritarian states China, Russia, Iran and North Korea. It was coined for the 2023 Halifax International Security Forum by its president Peter Van Praagh.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Kendall-Taylor, Andrea; Fontaine, Richard (2024-04-23). "The Axis of Upheaval". Foreign Affairs. Vol. 103, no. 3. ISSN   0015-7120. Archived from the original on 2024-09-09. Retrieved 2024-08-01.
  2. ↑ Geri, Maurizio (2024-07-12). "NATO-EU failing energy strategy against the 'Axis of Upheaval' turns on a DIME". Friends of Europe. Archived from the original on 2024-08-02. Retrieved 2024-08-01.
  3. 1 2 Glosserman, Brad (2024-05-28). "Echoes of 1962, the Berlin crisis and a world teetering on war". The Japan Times. Archived from the original on 2024-08-02. Retrieved 2024-08-01.
  4. 1 2 3 4 Sabbagh, Dan (2024-07-30). "'Axis of upheaval' adds urgency to review of UK defence spending". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077. Archived from the original on 2024-09-09. Retrieved 2024-08-01.
  5. 1 2 Sabbagh, Dan (2024-07-23). "Army chief says UK must double its lethality or be prepared for war in 2027". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077. Archived from the original on 2024-09-09. Retrieved 2024-08-01.
  6. ↑ "NATO Public Forum: The Axis of Upheaval featuring CSIS's Jon B. Alterman". Center for Strategic and International Studies . 2024-07-23. Archived from the original on 2024-08-02. Retrieved 2024-08-02.
  7. ↑ "Former NATO Chief Warns Against 'Axis of Autocracies'". Voice of America . 19 January 2024.
  8. ↑ Stallard, Katie (14 September 2023). "Welcome to Putin and Kim's parallel reality". New Statesman .
  9. ↑ "The West's Next Challenge Is the Rising Axis of Autocracies". The Wall Street Journal . 24 August 2024.
  10. 1 2 "World Figures Convene in Canada To Address Threats Posed By CRINK". Iran International . Iran International Newsroom. November 21, 2023. Archived from the original on September 9, 2024. Retrieved August 4, 2024.
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Kendall-Taylor, Andrea (2024-05-29). "The Axis of Upheaval: How the Convergence of Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea Will Challenge the US and Europe". ICDS. Archived from the original on 2024-08-02. Retrieved 2024-08-01.
  12. 1 2 May, Clifford (15 December 2021). "China, Russia and Iran: The empires strike back". The Washington Times .
  13. ↑ Orlando Figes (30 September 2022). "Putin Sees Himself as Part of the History of Russia's Tsars—Including Their Imperialism". Time .
  14. ↑ Marsden, Harriet (14 May 2024). "Crink: the new autocractic 'axis of evil'". The Week .
  15. ↑ "West facing 'authoritarian' alliance, says Nato chief". BBC News . 6 April 2024.
  16. 1 2 Mankoff, Jeffrey (2022). Empires of Eurasia: How Imperial Legacies Shape International Security. Yale University Press. pp. 2–9.
  17. 1 2 McCann, Daryl (14 April 2024). "Russia, China and Iran: An Uneasy Alliance of Rogues". Quadrant .
  18. ↑ Axe, David (16 April 2024). "There is only one war going on and it is global". The Daily Telegraph .
  19. ↑ Brands, Hal (14 April 2024). "China, Russia and Iran Are Reviving the Age of Empires". Bloomberg .
  20. ↑ Sher, Nathaniel (6 May 2024). "Behind the Scenes: China's Increasing Role in Russia's Defense Industry". Carnegie Endowment. Archived from the original on 13 July 2024. Retrieved 31 July 2024.
  21. ↑ First unit of N. Korean troops deployed to front lines in western Russia: reports
  22. ↑ https://www.nato.int/docu/review/articles/2017/01/06/will-the-populist-wave-wash-away-nato-and-the-european-union/index.html
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.