Theta function Last updated October 21, 2025  Special functions of several complex variables
 Jacobi's theta function θ 1 q  = e   = 0.1e θ 1 ( z , q ) = 2 q 1 4 ∑ n = 0 ∞ ( − 1 ) n q n ( n + 1 ) sin  ( 2 n + 1 ) z = ∑ n = − ∞ ∞ ( − 1 ) n − 1 2 q ( n + 1 2 ) 2 e ( 2 n + 1 ) i z . {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\theta _{1}(z,q)&=2q^{\frac {1}{4}}\sum _{n=0}^{\infty }(-1)^{n}q^{n(n+1)}\sin(2n+1)z\\&=\sum _{n=-\infty }^{\infty }(-1)^{n-{\frac {1}{2}}}q^{\left(n+{\frac {1}{2}}\right)^{2}}e^{(2n+1)iz}.\end{aligned}}}   In mathematics , theta functions  are special functions  of several complex variables . They show up in many topics, including Abelian varieties , moduli spaces , quadratic forms , and solitons . Theta functions are parametrized by points in a tube domain  inside a complex Lagrangian Grassmannian , [ 1]   namely the Siegel upper half space .
The most common form of theta function is that occurring in the theory of elliptic functions . With respect to one of the complex variables (conventionally called z ), a theta function has a property expressing its behavior with respect to the addition of a period of the associated elliptic functions, making it a quasiperiodic function . In the abstract theory this quasiperiodicity comes from the cohomology class  of a line bundle on a complex torus , a condition of descent .
One interpretation of theta functions when dealing with the heat equation is that "a theta function is a special function that describes the evolution of temperature on a segment domain subject to certain boundary conditions". [ 2]  
Throughout this article, ( e π i τ ) α {\displaystyle (e^{\pi i\tau })^{\alpha }} e α π i τ {\displaystyle e^{\alpha \pi i\tau }} branch ). [ note 1]  
Jacobi theta function There are several closely related functions called Jacobi theta functions, and many different and incompatible systems of notation  for them.  One Jacobi theta function  (named after Carl Gustav Jacob Jacobi ) is a function defined for two complex variables z  and τ , where z  can be any complex number  and τ  is the half-period ratio , confined to the upper half-plane , which means it has a positive imaginary part. It is given by the formula
ϑ ( z ; τ ) = ∑ n = − ∞ ∞ exp  ( π i n 2 τ + 2 π i n z ) = 1 + 2 ∑ n = 1 ∞ q n 2 cos  ( 2 π n z ) = ∑ n = − ∞ ∞ q n 2 η n {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\vartheta (z;\tau )&=\sum _{n=-\infty }^{\infty }\exp \left(\pi in^{2}\tau +2\pi inz\right)\\&=1+2\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }q^{n^{2}}\cos(2\pi nz)\\&=\sum _{n=-\infty }^{\infty }q^{n^{2}}\eta ^{n}\end{aligned}}} where q  = exp(πiτ )nome  and η  = exp(2πiz )Jacobi form . The restriction ensures that it is an absolutely convergent  series. At fixed τ , this is a Fourier series  for a 1-periodic entire function  of z . Accordingly, the theta function is 1-periodic in z :
ϑ ( z + 1 ; τ ) = ϑ ( z ; τ ) . {\displaystyle \vartheta (z+1;\tau )=\vartheta (z;\tau ).} By completing the square , it is also τ -quasiperiodic in z , with
ϑ ( z + τ ; τ ) = exp  ( − π i ( τ + 2 z ) ) ϑ ( z ; τ ) . {\displaystyle \vartheta (z+\tau  ;\tau )=\exp {\bigl (}-\pi i(\tau +2z){\bigr )}\vartheta (z;\tau ).} Thus, in general,
ϑ ( z + a + b τ ; τ ) = exp  ( − π i b 2 τ − 2 π i b z ) ϑ ( z ; τ ) {\displaystyle \vartheta (z+a+b\tau  ;\tau )=\exp \left(-\pi ib^{2}\tau -2\pi ibz\right)\vartheta (z;\tau )} for any integers a  and b .
For any fixed τ {\displaystyle \tau } Liouville's theorem , it cannot be doubly periodic in 1 , τ {\displaystyle 1,\tau } 1 {\displaystyle 1} τ {\displaystyle \tau } | ϑ ( z + a + b τ ; τ ) ϑ ( z ; τ ) | = exp  ( π ( b 2 ℑ ( τ ) + 2 b ℑ ( z ) ) ) {\displaystyle \left|{\frac {\vartheta (z+a+b\tau  ;\tau )}{\vartheta (z;\tau )}}\right|=\exp \left(\pi (b^{2}\Im (\tau )+2b\Im (z))\right)} ℑ ( τ ) > 0 {\displaystyle \Im (\tau )>0} ϑ ( z , τ ) {\displaystyle \vartheta (z,\tau )} 
It is in fact the most general entire function with 2 quasi-periods, in the following sense: [ 3]  
 Theta function θ 1 q  = e q  changes with τ .   Theta function θ 1 q  = e q  changes with τ .  Auxiliary functions The Jacobi theta function defined above is sometimes considered along with three auxiliary theta functions, in which case it is written with a double 0 subscript:
ϑ 00 ( z ; τ ) = ϑ ( z ; τ ) {\displaystyle \vartheta _{00}(z;\tau )=\vartheta (z;\tau )} The auxiliary (or half-period) functions are defined by
ϑ 01 ( z ; τ ) = ϑ ( z + 1 2 ; τ ) ϑ 10 ( z ; τ ) = exp  ( 1 4 π i τ + π i z ) ϑ ( z + 1 2 τ ; τ ) ϑ 11 ( z ; τ ) = exp  ( 1 4 π i τ + π i ( z + 1 2 ) ) ϑ ( z + 1 2 τ + 1 2 ; τ ) . {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\vartheta _{01}(z;\tau )&=\vartheta \left(z+{\tfrac {1}{2}};\tau \right)\\[3pt]\vartheta _{10}(z;\tau )&=\exp \left({\tfrac {1}{4}}\pi i\tau +\pi iz\right)\vartheta \left(z+{\tfrac {1}{2}}\tau  ;\tau \right)\\[3pt]\vartheta _{11}(z;\tau )&=\exp \left({\tfrac {1}{4}}\pi i\tau +\pi i\left(z+{\tfrac {1}{2}}\right)\right)\vartheta \left(z+{\tfrac {1}{2}}\tau +{\tfrac {1}{2}};\tau \right).\end{aligned}}} This notation follows Riemann  and Mumford ; Jacobi 's original formulation was in terms of the nome  q  = e iπτ τ . In Jacobi's notation the θ -functions are written:
θ 1 ( z ; q ) = θ 1 ( π z , q ) = − ϑ 11 ( z ; τ ) θ 2 ( z ; q ) = θ 2 ( π z , q ) = ϑ 10 ( z ; τ ) θ 3 ( z ; q ) = θ 3 ( π z , q ) = ϑ 00 ( z ; τ ) θ 4 ( z ; q ) = θ 4 ( π z , q ) = ϑ 01 ( z ; τ ) {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\theta _{1}(z;q)&=\theta _{1}(\pi z,q)=-\vartheta _{11}(z;\tau )\\\theta _{2}(z;q)&=\theta _{2}(\pi z,q)=\vartheta _{10}(z;\tau )\\\theta _{3}(z;q)&=\theta _{3}(\pi z,q)=\vartheta _{00}(z;\tau )\\\theta _{4}(z;q)&=\theta _{4}(\pi z,q)=\vartheta _{01}(z;\tau )\end{aligned}}}  Jacobi theta 1   Jacobi theta 2   Jacobi theta 3   Jacobi theta 4  The above definitions of the Jacobi theta functions are by no means unique. See Jacobi theta functions (notational variations)  for further discussion.
If we set z  = 0τ  only, defined on the upper half-plane. These functions are called Theta Nullwert  functions, based on the German term for zero value  because of the annullation of the left entry in the theta function expression. Alternatively, we obtain four functions of q  only, defined on the unit disk | q | < 1 {\displaystyle |q|<1} theta constants : [ note 2]  
ϑ 11 ( 0 ; τ ) = − θ 1 ( q ) = − ∑ n = − ∞ ∞ ( − 1 ) n − 1 / 2 q ( n + 1 / 2 ) 2 ϑ 10 ( 0 ; τ ) = θ 2 ( q ) = ∑ n = − ∞ ∞ q ( n + 1 / 2 ) 2 ϑ 00 ( 0 ; τ ) = θ 3 ( q ) = ∑ n = − ∞ ∞ q n 2 ϑ 01 ( 0 ; τ ) = θ 4 ( q ) = ∑ n = − ∞ ∞ ( − 1 ) n q n 2 {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\vartheta _{11}(0;\tau )&=-\theta _{1}(q)=-\sum _{n=-\infty }^{\infty }(-1)^{n-1/2}q^{(n+1/2)^{2}}\\\vartheta _{10}(0;\tau )&=\theta _{2}(q)=\sum _{n=-\infty }^{\infty }q^{(n+1/2)^{2}}\\\vartheta _{00}(0;\tau )&=\theta _{3}(q)=\sum _{n=-\infty }^{\infty }q^{n^{2}}\\\vartheta _{01}(0;\tau )&=\theta _{4}(q)=\sum _{n=-\infty }^{\infty }(-1)^{n}q^{n^{2}}\end{aligned}}} with the nome  q  = e iπτ θ 1 ( q ) = 0 {\displaystyle \theta _{1}(q)=0} modular forms , and to parametrize certain curves; in particular, the Jacobi identity  is
θ 2 ( q ) 4 + θ 4 ( q ) 4 = θ 3 ( q ) 4 {\displaystyle \theta _{2}(q)^{4}+\theta _{4}(q)^{4}=\theta _{3}(q)^{4}} or equivalently,
ϑ 01 ( 0 ; τ ) 4 + ϑ 10 ( 0 ; τ ) 4 = ϑ 00 ( 0 ; τ ) 4 {\displaystyle \vartheta _{01}(0;\tau )^{4}+\vartheta _{10}(0;\tau )^{4}=\vartheta _{00}(0;\tau )^{4}} which is the Fermat curve  of degree four.
Jacobi identities Jacobi's identities describe how theta functions transform under the modular group , which is generated by τ  ↦ τ  + 1τ  ↦ − 1 / τ  τ  in the exponent has the same effect as adding  1 / 2  z  (n  ≡ n 2  mod  2
α = ( − i τ ) 1 2 exp  ( π τ i z 2 ) . {\displaystyle \alpha =(-i\tau )^{\frac {1}{2}}\exp \left({\frac {\pi }{\tau }}iz^{2}\right).} Then
ϑ 00 ( z τ ; − 1 τ ) = α ϑ 00 ( z ; τ ) ϑ 01 ( z τ ; − 1 τ ) = α ϑ 10 ( z ; τ ) ϑ 10 ( z τ ; − 1 τ ) = α ϑ 01 ( z ; τ ) ϑ 11 ( z τ ; − 1 τ ) = − i α ϑ 11 ( z ; τ ) . {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\vartheta _{00}\!\left({\frac {z}{\tau }};{\frac {-1}{\tau }}\right)&=\alpha \,\vartheta _{00}(z;\tau )\quad &\vartheta _{01}\!\left({\frac {z}{\tau }};{\frac {-1}{\tau }}\right)&=\alpha \,\vartheta _{10}(z;\tau )\\[3pt]\vartheta _{10}\!\left({\frac {z}{\tau }};{\frac {-1}{\tau }}\right)&=\alpha \,\vartheta _{01}(z;\tau )\quad &\vartheta _{11}\!\left({\frac {z}{\tau }};{\frac {-1}{\tau }}\right)&=-i\alpha \,\vartheta _{11}(z;\tau ).\end{aligned}}} Theta functions in terms of the nome Instead of expressing the Theta functions in terms of z  and τ , we may express them in terms of arguments w  and the nome  q , where w  = e πiz q  = e πiτ 
ϑ 00 ( w , q ) = ∑ n = − ∞ ∞ ( w 2 ) n q n 2 ϑ 01 ( w , q ) = ∑ n = − ∞ ∞ ( − 1 ) n ( w 2 ) n q n 2 ϑ 10 ( w , q ) = ∑ n = − ∞ ∞ ( w 2 ) n + 1 2 q ( n + 1 2 ) 2 ϑ 11 ( w , q ) = i ∑ n = − ∞ ∞ ( − 1 ) n ( w 2 ) n + 1 2 q ( n + 1 2 ) 2 . {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\vartheta _{00}(w,q)&=\sum _{n=-\infty }^{\infty }\left(w^{2}\right)^{n}q^{n^{2}}\quad &\vartheta _{01}(w,q)&=\sum _{n=-\infty }^{\infty }(-1)^{n}\left(w^{2}\right)^{n}q^{n^{2}}\\[3pt]\vartheta _{10}(w,q)&=\sum _{n=-\infty }^{\infty }\left(w^{2}\right)^{n+{\frac {1}{2}}}q^{\left(n+{\frac {1}{2}}\right)^{2}}\quad &\vartheta _{11}(w,q)&=i\sum _{n=-\infty }^{\infty }(-1)^{n}\left(w^{2}\right)^{n+{\frac {1}{2}}}q^{\left(n+{\frac {1}{2}}\right)^{2}}.\end{aligned}}} We see that the theta functions can also be defined in terms of w  and q , without a direct reference to the exponential function. These formulas can, therefore, be used to define the Theta functions over other fields  where the exponential function might not be everywhere defined, such as fields of p -adic numbers
Product representations The Jacobi triple product  (a special case of the Macdonald identities ) tells us that for complex numbers w  and q  with | q |  < 1w  ≠ 0
∏ m = 1 ∞ ( 1 − q 2 m ) ( 1 + w 2 q 2 m − 1 ) ( 1 + w − 2 q 2 m − 1 ) = ∑ n = − ∞ ∞ w 2 n q n 2 . {\displaystyle \prod _{m=1}^{\infty }\left(1-q^{2m}\right)\left(1+w^{2}q^{2m-1}\right)\left(1+w^{-2}q^{2m-1}\right)=\sum _{n=-\infty }^{\infty }w^{2n}q^{n^{2}}.} It can be proven by elementary means, as for instance in Hardy and Wright's  An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers   .
If we express the theta function in terms of the nome q  = e πiτ q  = e 2πiτ  w  = e πiz 
ϑ ( z ; τ ) = ∑ n = − ∞ ∞ exp  ( π i τ n 2 ) exp  ( 2 π i z n ) = ∑ n = − ∞ ∞ w 2 n q n 2 . {\displaystyle \vartheta (z;\tau )=\sum _{n=-\infty }^{\infty }\exp(\pi i\tau n^{2})\exp(2\pi izn)=\sum _{n=-\infty }^{\infty }w^{2n}q^{n^{2}}.} We therefore obtain a product formula for the theta function in the form
ϑ ( z ; τ ) = ∏ m = 1 ∞ ( 1 − exp  ( 2 m π i τ ) ) ( 1 + exp  ( ( 2 m − 1 ) π i τ + 2 π i z ) ) ( 1 + exp  ( ( 2 m − 1 ) π i τ − 2 π i z ) ) . {\displaystyle \vartheta (z;\tau )=\prod _{m=1}^{\infty }{\big (}1-\exp(2m\pi i\tau ){\big )}{\Big (}1+\exp {\big (}(2m-1)\pi i\tau +2\pi iz{\big )}{\Big )}{\Big (}1+\exp {\big (}(2m-1)\pi i\tau -2\pi iz{\big )}{\Big )}.} In terms of w  and q :
ϑ ( z ; τ ) = ∏ m = 1 ∞ ( 1 − q 2 m ) ( 1 + q 2 m − 1 w 2 ) ( 1 + q 2 m − 1 w 2 ) = ( q 2 ; q 2 ) ∞ ( − w 2 q ; q 2 ) ∞ ( − q w 2 ; q 2 ) ∞ = ( q 2 ; q 2 ) ∞ θ ( − w 2 q ; q 2 ) {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\vartheta (z;\tau )&=\prod _{m=1}^{\infty }\left(1-q^{2m}\right)\left(1+q^{2m-1}w^{2}\right)\left(1+{\frac {q^{2m-1}}{w^{2}}}\right)\\&=\left(q^{2};q^{2}\right)_{\infty }\,\left(-w^{2}q;q^{2}\right)_{\infty }\,\left(-{\frac {q}{w^{2}}};q^{2}\right)_{\infty }\\&=\left(q^{2};q^{2}\right)_{\infty }\,\theta \left(-w^{2}q;q^{2}\right)\end{aligned}}} where (    ;    )∞   is the q -Pochhammer symbolθ (    ;    )q -theta function
∏ m = 1 ∞ ( 1 − q 2 m ) ( 1 + ( w 2 + w − 2 ) q 2 m − 1 + q 4 m − 2 ) , {\displaystyle \prod _{m=1}^{\infty }\left(1-q^{2m}\right){\Big (}1+\left(w^{2}+w^{-2}\right)q^{2m-1}+q^{4m-2}{\Big )},} which we may also write as
ϑ ( z ∣ q ) = ∏ m = 1 ∞ ( 1 − q 2 m ) ( 1 + 2 cos  ( 2 π z ) q 2 m − 1 + q 4 m − 2 ) . {\displaystyle \vartheta (z\mid q)=\prod _{m=1}^{\infty }\left(1-q^{2m}\right)\left(1+2\cos(2\pi z)q^{2m-1}+q^{4m-2}\right).} This form is valid in general but clearly is of particular interest when z  is real. Similar product formulas for the auxiliary theta functions are
ϑ 01 ( z ∣ q ) = ∏ m = 1 ∞ ( 1 − q 2 m ) ( 1 − 2 cos  ( 2 π z ) q 2 m − 1 + q 4 m − 2 ) , ϑ 10 ( z ∣ q ) = 2 q 1 4 cos  ( π z ) ∏ m = 1 ∞ ( 1 − q 2 m ) ( 1 + 2 cos  ( 2 π z ) q 2 m + q 4 m ) , ϑ 11 ( z ∣ q ) = − 2 q 1 4 sin  ( π z ) ∏ m = 1 ∞ ( 1 − q 2 m ) ( 1 − 2 cos  ( 2 π z ) q 2 m + q 4 m ) . {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\vartheta _{01}(z\mid q)&=\prod _{m=1}^{\infty }\left(1-q^{2m}\right)\left(1-2\cos(2\pi z)q^{2m-1}+q^{4m-2}\right),\\[3pt]\vartheta _{10}(z\mid q)&=2q^{\frac {1}{4}}\cos(\pi z)\prod _{m=1}^{\infty }\left(1-q^{2m}\right)\left(1+2\cos(2\pi z)q^{2m}+q^{4m}\right),\\[3pt]\vartheta _{11}(z\mid q)&=-2q^{\frac {1}{4}}\sin(\pi z)\prod _{m=1}^{\infty }\left(1-q^{2m}\right)\left(1-2\cos(2\pi z)q^{2m}+q^{4m}\right).\end{aligned}}} In particular, lim q → 0 ϑ 10 ( z ∣ q ) 2 q 1 4 = cos  ( π z ) , lim q → 0 − ϑ 11 ( z ∣ q ) 2 q − 1 4 = sin  ( π z ) {\displaystyle \lim _{q\to 0}{\frac {\vartheta _{10}(z\mid q)}{2q^{\frac {1}{4}}}}=\cos(\pi z),\quad \lim _{q\to 0}{\frac {-\vartheta _{11}(z\mid q)}{2q^{-{\frac {1}{4}}}}}=\sin(\pi z)} sin , cos {\displaystyle \sin ,\cos } 
Integral representations The Jacobi theta functions have the following integral representations:
ϑ 00 ( z ; τ ) = − i ∫ i − ∞ i + ∞ e i π τ u 2 cos  ( 2 π u z + π u ) sin  ( π u ) d u ; ϑ 01 ( z ; τ ) = − i ∫ i − ∞ i + ∞ e i π τ u 2 cos  ( 2 π u z ) sin  ( π u ) d u ; ϑ 10 ( z ; τ ) = − i e i π z + 1 4 i π τ ∫ i − ∞ i + ∞ e i π τ u 2 cos  ( 2 π u z + π u + π τ u ) sin  ( π u ) d u ; ϑ 11 ( z ; τ ) = e i π z + 1 4 i π τ ∫ i − ∞ i + ∞ e i π τ u 2 cos  ( 2 π u z + π τ u ) sin  ( π u ) d u . {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\vartheta _{00}(z;\tau )&=-i\int _{i-\infty }^{i+\infty }e^{i\pi \tau u^{2}}{\frac {\cos(2\pi uz+\pi u)}{\sin(\pi u)}}\mathrm {d} u;\\[6pt]\vartheta _{01}(z;\tau )&=-i\int _{i-\infty }^{i+\infty }e^{i\pi \tau u^{2}}{\frac {\cos(2\pi uz)}{\sin(\pi u)}}\mathrm {d} u;\\[6pt]\vartheta _{10}(z;\tau )&=-ie^{i\pi z+{\frac {1}{4}}i\pi \tau }\int _{i-\infty }^{i+\infty }e^{i\pi \tau u^{2}}{\frac {\cos(2\pi uz+\pi u+\pi \tau u)}{\sin(\pi u)}}\mathrm {d} u;\\[6pt]\vartheta _{11}(z;\tau )&=e^{i\pi z+{\frac {1}{4}}i\pi \tau }\int _{i-\infty }^{i+\infty }e^{i\pi \tau u^{2}}{\frac {\cos(2\pi uz+\pi \tau u)}{\sin(\pi u)}}\mathrm {d} u.\end{aligned}}} The Theta Nullwert function θ 3 ( q ) {\displaystyle \theta _{3}(q)} 
θ 3 ( q ) = 1 + 4 q ln  ( 1 / q ) π ∫ 0 ∞ exp  [ − ln  ( 1 / q ) x 2 ] { 1 − q 2 cos  [ 2 ln  ( 1 / q ) x ] } 1 − 2 q 2 cos  [ 2 ln  ( 1 / q ) x ] + q 4 d x {\displaystyle \theta _{3}(q)=1+{\frac {4q{\sqrt {\ln(1/q)}}}{\sqrt {\pi }}}\int _{0}^{\infty }{\frac {\exp[-\ln(1/q)\,x^{2}]\{1-q^{2}\cos[2\ln(1/q)\,x]\}}{1-2q^{2}\cos[2\ln(1/q)\,x]+q^{4}}}\,\mathrm {d} x} This formula was discussed in the essay Square series generating function transformations  by the mathematician Maxie Schmidt from Georgia in Atlanta.
Based on this formula following three eminent examples are given:
[ 2 π K ( 1 2 2 ) ] 1 / 2 = θ 3 [ exp  ( − π ) ] = 1 + 4 exp  ( − π ) ∫ 0 ∞ exp  ( − π x 2 ) [ 1 − exp  ( − 2 π ) cos  ( 2 π x ) ] 1 − 2 exp  ( − 2 π ) cos  ( 2 π x ) + exp  ( − 4 π ) d x {\displaystyle {\biggl [}{\frac {2}{\pi }}K{\bigl (}{\frac {1}{2}}{\sqrt {2}}{\bigr )}{\biggr ]}^{1/2}=\theta _{3}{\bigl [}\exp(-\pi ){\bigr ]}=1+4\exp(-\pi )\int _{0}^{\infty }{\frac {\exp(-\pi x^{2})[1-\exp(-2\pi )\cos(2\pi x)]}{1-2\exp(-2\pi )\cos(2\pi x)+\exp(-4\pi )}}\,\mathrm {d} x} [ 2 π K ( 2 − 1 ) ] 1 / 2 = θ 3 [ exp  ( − 2 π ) ] = 1 + 4 2 4 exp  ( − 2 π ) ∫ 0 ∞ exp  ( − 2 π x 2 ) [ 1 − exp  ( − 2 2 π ) cos  ( 2 2 π x ) ] 1 − 2 exp  ( − 2 2 π ) cos  ( 2 2 π x ) + exp  ( − 4 2 π ) d x {\displaystyle {\biggl [}{\frac {2}{\pi }}K({\sqrt {2}}-1){\biggr ]}^{1/2}=\theta _{3}{\bigl [}\exp(-{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi ){\bigr ]}=1+4\,{\sqrt[{4}]{2}}\exp(-{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi )\int _{0}^{\infty }{\frac {\exp(-{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi x^{2})[1-\exp(-2{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi )\cos(2{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi x)]}{1-2\exp(-2{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi )\cos(2{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi x)+\exp(-4{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi )}}\,\mathrm {d} x} { 2 π K [ sin  ( π 12 ) ] } 1 / 2 = θ 3 [ exp  ( − 3 π ) ] = 1 + 4 3 4 exp  ( − 3 π ) ∫ 0 ∞ exp  ( − 3 π x 2 ) [ 1 − exp  ( − 2 3 π ) cos  ( 2 3 π x ) ] 1 − 2 exp  ( − 2 3 π ) cos  ( 2 3 π x ) + exp  ( − 4 3 π ) d x {\displaystyle {\biggl \{}{\frac {2}{\pi }}K{\bigl [}\sin {\bigl (}{\frac {\pi }{12}}{\bigr )}{\bigr ]}{\biggr \}}^{1/2}=\theta _{3}{\bigl [}\exp(-{\sqrt {3}}\,\pi ){\bigr ]}=1+4\,{\sqrt[{4}]{3}}\exp(-{\sqrt {3}}\,\pi )\int _{0}^{\infty }{\frac {\exp(-{\sqrt {3}}\,\pi x^{2})[1-\exp(-2{\sqrt {3}}\,\pi )\cos(2{\sqrt {3}}\,\pi x)]}{1-2\exp(-2{\sqrt {3}}\,\pi )\cos(2{\sqrt {3}}\,\pi x)+\exp(-4{\sqrt {3}}\,\pi )}}\,\mathrm {d} x} Furthermore, the theta examples θ 3 ( 1 2 ) {\displaystyle \theta _{3}({\tfrac {1}{2}})} θ 3 ( 1 3 ) {\displaystyle \theta _{3}({\tfrac {1}{3}})} 
θ 3 ( 1 2 ) = 1 + 2 ∑ n = 1 ∞ 1 2 n 2 = 1 + 2 π − 1 / 2 ln  ( 2 ) ∫ 0 ∞ exp  [ − ln  ( 2 ) x 2 ] { 16 − 4 cos  [ 2 ln  ( 2 ) x ] } 17 − 8 cos  [ 2 ln  ( 2 ) x ] d x {\displaystyle \theta _{3}\left({\frac {1}{2}}\right)=1+2\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {1}{2^{n^{2}}}}=1+2\pi ^{-1/2}{\sqrt {\ln(2)}}\int _{0}^{\infty }{\frac {\exp[-\ln(2)\,x^{2}]\{16-4\cos[2\ln(2)\,x]\}}{17-8\cos[2\ln(2)\,x]}}\,\mathrm {d} x} θ 3 ( 1 2 ) = 2.128936827211877158669 … {\displaystyle \theta _{3}\left({\frac {1}{2}}\right)=2.128936827211877158669\ldots } θ 3 ( 1 3 ) = 1 + 2 ∑ n = 1 ∞ 1 3 n 2 = 1 + 4 3 π − 1 / 2 ln  ( 3 ) ∫ 0 ∞ exp  [ − ln  ( 3 ) x 2 ] { 81 − 9 cos  [ 2 ln  ( 3 ) x ] } 82 − 18 cos  [ 2 ln  ( 3 ) x ] d x {\displaystyle \theta _{3}\left({\frac {1}{3}}\right)=1+2\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {1}{3^{n^{2}}}}=1+{\frac {4}{3}}\pi ^{-1/2}{\sqrt {\ln(3)}}\int _{0}^{\infty }{\frac {\exp[-\ln(3)\,x^{2}]\{81-9\cos[2\ln(3)\,x]\}}{82-18\cos[2\ln(3)\,x]}}\,\mathrm {d} x} θ 3 ( 1 3 ) = 1.691459681681715341348 … {\displaystyle \theta _{3}\left({\frac {1}{3}}\right)=1.691459681681715341348\ldots } Explicit values Proper credit for most of these results goes to Ramanujan. See Ramanujan's lost notebook  and a relevant reference at Euler function .  The Ramanujan results quoted at Euler function  plus a few elementary operations give the results below, so they are either in Ramanujan's lost notebook or follow immediately from it. See also Yi (2004). [ 4]   Define,
φ ( q ) = ϑ 00 ( 0 ; τ ) = θ 3 ( 0 ; q ) = ∑ n = − ∞ ∞ q n 2 {\displaystyle \quad \varphi (q)=\vartheta _{00}(0;\tau )=\theta _{3}(0;q)=\sum _{n=-\infty }^{\infty }q^{n^{2}}} with the nome q = e π i τ , {\displaystyle q=e^{\pi i\tau },} τ = n − 1 , {\displaystyle \tau =n{\sqrt {-1}},} Dedekind eta function  η ( τ ) . {\displaystyle \eta (\tau ).} n = 1 , 2 , 3 , … {\displaystyle n=1,2,3,\dots } 
φ ( e − π ) = π 4 Γ ( 3 4 ) = 2 η ( − 1 ) φ ( e − 2 π ) = π 4 Γ ( 3 4 ) 2 + 2 2 φ ( e − 3 π ) = π 4 Γ ( 3 4 ) 1 + 3 108 8 φ ( e − 4 π ) = π 4 Γ ( 3 4 ) 2 + 8 4 4 φ ( e − 5 π ) = π 4 Γ ( 3 4 ) 2 + 5 5 φ ( e − 6 π ) = π 4 Γ ( 3 4 ) 1 4 + 3 4 + 4 4 + 9 4 12 3 8 φ ( e − 7 π ) = π 4 Γ ( 3 4 ) 13 + 7 + 7 + 3 7 14 3 8 ⋅ 7 16 φ ( e − 8 π ) = π 4 Γ ( 3 4 ) 2 + 2 + 128 8 4 φ ( e − 9 π ) = π 4 Γ ( 3 4 ) 1 + 2 + 2 3 3 3 φ ( e − 10 π ) = π 4 Γ ( 3 4 ) 64 4 + 80 4 + 81 4 + 100 4 200 4 φ ( e − 11 π ) = π 4 Γ ( 3 4 ) 11 + 11 + ( 5 + 3 3 + 11 + 33 ) − 44 + 33 3 3 + ( − 5 + 3 3 − 11 + 33 ) 44 + 33 3 3 52180524 8 φ ( e − 12 π ) = π 4 Γ ( 3 4 ) 1 4 + 2 4 + 3 4 + 4 4 + 9 4 + 18 4 + 24 4 2 108 8 φ ( e − 13 π ) = π 4 Γ ( 3 4 ) 13 + 8 13 + ( 11 − 6 3 + 13 ) 143 + 78 3 3 + ( 11 + 6 3 + 13 ) 143 − 78 3 3 19773 4 φ ( e − 14 π ) = π 4 Γ ( 3 4 ) 13 + 7 + 7 + 3 7 + 10 + 2 7 + 28 8 4 + 7 28 7 16 φ ( e − 15 π ) = π 4 Γ ( 3 4 ) 7 + 3 3 + 5 + 15 + 60 4 + 1500 4 12 3 8 ⋅ 5 2 φ ( e − 16 π ) = φ ( e − 4 π ) + π 4 Γ ( 3 4 ) 1 + 2 4 128 16 φ ( e − 17 π ) = π 4 Γ ( 3 4 ) 2 ( 1 + 17 4 ) + 17 8 5 + 17 17 + 17 17 2 φ ( e − 20 π ) = φ ( e − 5 π ) + π 4 Γ ( 3 4 ) 3 + 2 5 4 5 2 6 φ ( e − 36 π ) = 3 φ ( e − 9 π ) + 2 φ ( e − 4 π ) − φ ( e − π ) + π 4 Γ ( 3 4 ) 2 4 + 18 4 + 216 4 3 {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\varphi \left(e^{-\pi }\right)&={\frac {\sqrt[{4}]{\pi }}{\Gamma \left({\frac {3}{4}}\right)}}={\sqrt {2}}\,\eta \left({\sqrt {-1}}\right)\\\varphi \left(e^{-2\pi }\right)&={\frac {\sqrt[{4}]{\pi }}{\Gamma \left({\frac {3}{4}}\right)}}{\frac {\sqrt {2+{\sqrt {2}}}}{2}}\\\varphi \left(e^{-3\pi }\right)&={\frac {\sqrt[{4}]{\pi }}{\Gamma \left({\frac {3}{4}}\right)}}{\frac {\sqrt {1+{\sqrt {3}}}}{\sqrt[{8}]{108}}}\\\varphi \left(e^{-4\pi }\right)&={\frac {\sqrt[{4}]{\pi }}{\Gamma \left({\frac {3}{4}}\right)}}{\frac {2+{\sqrt[{4}]{8}}}{4}}\\\varphi \left(e^{-5\pi }\right)&={\frac {\sqrt[{4}]{\pi }}{\Gamma \left({\frac {3}{4}}\right)}}{\sqrt {\frac {2+{\sqrt {5}}}{5}}}\\\varphi \left(e^{-6\pi }\right)&={\frac {\sqrt[{4}]{\pi }}{\Gamma \left({\frac {3}{4}}\right)}}{\frac {\sqrt {{\sqrt[{4}]{1}}+{\sqrt[{4}]{3}}+{\sqrt[{4}]{4}}+{\sqrt[{4}]{9}}}}{\sqrt[{8}]{12^{3}}}}\\\varphi \left(e^{-7\pi }\right)&={\frac {\sqrt[{4}]{\pi }}{\Gamma \left({\frac {3}{4}}\right)}}{\frac {\sqrt {{\sqrt {13+{\sqrt {7}}}}+{\sqrt {7+3{\sqrt {7}}}}}}{{\sqrt[{8}]{14^{3}}}\cdot {\sqrt[{16}]{7}}}}\\\varphi \left(e^{-8\pi }\right)&={\frac {\sqrt[{4}]{\pi }}{\Gamma \left({\frac {3}{4}}\right)}}{\frac {{\sqrt {2+{\sqrt {2}}}}+{\sqrt[{8}]{128}}}{4}}\\\varphi \left(e^{-9\pi }\right)&={\frac {\sqrt[{4}]{\pi }}{\Gamma \left({\frac {3}{4}}\right)}}{\frac {1+{\sqrt[{3}]{2+2{\sqrt {3}}}}}{3}}\\\varphi \left(e^{-10\pi }\right)&={\frac {\sqrt[{4}]{\pi }}{\Gamma \left({\frac {3}{4}}\right)}}{\frac {\sqrt {{\sqrt[{4}]{64}}+{\sqrt[{4}]{80}}+{\sqrt[{4}]{81}}+{\sqrt[{4}]{100}}}}{\sqrt[{4}]{200}}}\\\varphi \left(e^{-11\pi }\right)&={\frac {\sqrt[{4}]{\pi }}{\Gamma \left({\frac {3}{4}}\right)}}{\frac {\sqrt {11+{\sqrt {11}}+(5+3{\sqrt {3}}+{\sqrt {11}}+{\sqrt {33}}){\sqrt[{3}]{-44+33{\sqrt {3}}}}+(-5+3{\sqrt {3}}-{\sqrt {11}}+{\sqrt {33}}){\sqrt[{3}]{44+33{\sqrt {3}}}}}}{\sqrt[{8}]{52180524}}}\\\varphi \left(e^{-12\pi }\right)&={\frac {\sqrt[{4}]{\pi }}{\Gamma \left({\frac {3}{4}}\right)}}{\frac {\sqrt {{\sqrt[{4}]{1}}+{\sqrt[{4}]{2}}+{\sqrt[{4}]{3}}+{\sqrt[{4}]{4}}+{\sqrt[{4}]{9}}+{\sqrt[{4}]{18}}+{\sqrt[{4}]{24}}}}{2{\sqrt[{8}]{108}}}}\\\varphi \left(e^{-13\pi }\right)&={\frac {\sqrt[{4}]{\pi }}{\Gamma \left({\frac {3}{4}}\right)}}{\frac {\sqrt {13+8{\sqrt {13}}+(11-6{\sqrt {3}}+{\sqrt {13}}){\sqrt[{3}]{143+78{\sqrt {3}}}}+(11+6{\sqrt {3}}+{\sqrt {13}}){\sqrt[{3}]{143-78{\sqrt {3}}}}}}{\sqrt[{4}]{19773}}}\\\varphi \left(e^{-14\pi }\right)&={\frac {\sqrt[{4}]{\pi }}{\Gamma \left({\frac {3}{4}}\right)}}{\frac {\sqrt {{\sqrt {13+{\sqrt {7}}}}+{\sqrt {7+3{\sqrt {7}}}}+{\sqrt {10+2{\sqrt {7}}}}+{\sqrt[{8}]{28}}{\sqrt {4+{\sqrt {7}}}}}}{\sqrt[{16}]{28^{7}}}}\\\varphi \left(e^{-15\pi }\right)&={\frac {\sqrt[{4}]{\pi }}{\Gamma \left({\frac {3}{4}}\right)}}{\frac {\sqrt {7+3{\sqrt {3}}+{\sqrt {5}}+{\sqrt {15}}+{\sqrt[{4}]{60}}+{\sqrt[{4}]{1500}}}}{{\sqrt[{8}]{12^{3}}}\cdot {\sqrt {5}}}}\\2\varphi \left(e^{-16\pi }\right)&=\varphi \left(e^{-4\pi }\right)+{\frac {\sqrt[{4}]{\pi }}{\Gamma \left({\frac {3}{4}}\right)}}{\frac {\sqrt[{4}]{1+{\sqrt {2}}}}{\sqrt[{16}]{128}}}\\\varphi \left(e^{-17\pi }\right)&={\frac {\sqrt[{4}]{\pi }}{\Gamma \left({\frac {3}{4}}\right)}}{\frac {{\sqrt {2}}(1+{\sqrt[{4}]{17}})+{\sqrt[{8}]{17}}{\sqrt {5+{\sqrt {17}}}}}{\sqrt {17+17{\sqrt {17}}}}}\\2\varphi \left(e^{-20\pi }\right)&=\varphi \left(e^{-5\pi }\right)+{\frac {\sqrt[{4}]{\pi }}{\Gamma \left({\frac {3}{4}}\right)}}{\sqrt {\frac {3+2{\sqrt[{4}]{5}}}{5{\sqrt {2}}}}}\\6\varphi \left(e^{-36\pi }\right)&=3\varphi \left(e^{-9\pi }\right)+2\varphi \left(e^{-4\pi }\right)-\varphi \left(e^{-\pi }\right)+{\frac {\sqrt[{4}]{\pi }}{\Gamma \left({\frac {3}{4}}\right)}}{\sqrt[{3}]{{\sqrt[{4}]{2}}+{\sqrt[{4}]{18}}+{\sqrt[{4}]{216}}}}\end{aligned}}} If the reciprocal of the Gelfond constant  is raised to the power of the reciprocal of an odd number, then the corresponding  ϑ 00 {\displaystyle \vartheta _{00}} ϕ {\displaystyle \phi } hyperbolic lemniscatic sine :
φ [ exp  ( − 1 5 π ) ] = π 4 Γ ( 3 4 ) − 1 slh  ( 1 5 2 ϖ ) slh  ( 2 5 2 ϖ ) {\displaystyle \varphi {\bigl [}\exp(-{\tfrac {1}{5}}\pi ){\bigr ]}={\sqrt[{4}]{\pi }}\,{\Gamma \left({\tfrac {3}{4}}\right)}^{-1}\operatorname {slh} {\bigl (}{\tfrac {1}{5}}{\sqrt {2}}\,\varpi {\bigr )}\operatorname {slh} {\bigl (}{\tfrac {2}{5}}{\sqrt {2}}\,\varpi {\bigr )}} φ [ exp  ( − 1 7 π ) ] = π 4 Γ ( 3 4 ) − 1 slh  ( 1 7 2 ϖ ) slh  ( 2 7 2 ϖ ) slh  ( 3 7 2 ϖ ) {\displaystyle \varphi {\bigl [}\exp(-{\tfrac {1}{7}}\pi ){\bigr ]}={\sqrt[{4}]{\pi }}\,{\Gamma \left({\tfrac {3}{4}}\right)}^{-1}\operatorname {slh} {\bigl (}{\tfrac {1}{7}}{\sqrt {2}}\,\varpi {\bigr )}\operatorname {slh} {\bigl (}{\tfrac {2}{7}}{\sqrt {2}}\,\varpi {\bigr )}\operatorname {slh} {\bigl (}{\tfrac {3}{7}}{\sqrt {2}}\,\varpi {\bigr )}} φ [ exp  ( − 1 9 π ) ] = π 4 Γ ( 3 4 ) − 1 slh  ( 1 9 2 ϖ ) slh  ( 2 9 2 ϖ ) slh  ( 3 9 2 ϖ ) slh  ( 4 9 2 ϖ ) {\displaystyle \varphi {\bigl [}\exp(-{\tfrac {1}{9}}\pi ){\bigr ]}={\sqrt[{4}]{\pi }}\,{\Gamma \left({\tfrac {3}{4}}\right)}^{-1}\operatorname {slh} {\bigl (}{\tfrac {1}{9}}{\sqrt {2}}\,\varpi {\bigr )}\operatorname {slh} {\bigl (}{\tfrac {2}{9}}{\sqrt {2}}\,\varpi {\bigr )}\operatorname {slh} {\bigl (}{\tfrac {3}{9}}{\sqrt {2}}\,\varpi {\bigr )}\operatorname {slh} {\bigl (}{\tfrac {4}{9}}{\sqrt {2}}\,\varpi {\bigr )}} φ [ exp  ( − 1 11 π ) ] = π 4 Γ ( 3 4 ) − 1 slh  ( 1 11 2 ϖ ) slh  ( 2 11 2 ϖ ) slh  ( 3 11 2 ϖ ) slh  ( 4 11 2 ϖ ) slh  ( 5 11 2 ϖ ) {\displaystyle \varphi {\bigl [}\exp(-{\tfrac {1}{11}}\pi ){\bigr ]}={\sqrt[{4}]{\pi }}\,{\Gamma \left({\tfrac {3}{4}}\right)}^{-1}\operatorname {slh} {\bigl (}{\tfrac {1}{11}}{\sqrt {2}}\,\varpi {\bigr )}\operatorname {slh} {\bigl (}{\tfrac {2}{11}}{\sqrt {2}}\,\varpi {\bigr )}\operatorname {slh} {\bigl (}{\tfrac {3}{11}}{\sqrt {2}}\,\varpi {\bigr )}\operatorname {slh} {\bigl (}{\tfrac {4}{11}}{\sqrt {2}}\,\varpi {\bigr )}\operatorname {slh} {\bigl (}{\tfrac {5}{11}}{\sqrt {2}}\,\varpi {\bigr )}} With the letter ϖ {\displaystyle \varpi } Lemniscate constant  is represented.
Note that the following modular identities hold:
2 φ ( q 4 ) = φ ( q ) + 2 φ 2 ( q 2 ) − φ 2 ( q ) 3 φ ( q 9 ) = φ ( q ) + 9 φ 4 ( q 3 ) φ ( q ) − φ 3 ( q ) 3 5 φ ( q 25 ) = φ ( q 5 ) cot  ( 1 2 arctan  ( 2 5 φ ( q ) φ ( q 5 ) φ 2 ( q ) − φ 2 ( q 5 ) 1 + s ( q ) − s 2 ( q ) s ( q ) ) ) {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}2\varphi \left(q^{4}\right)&=\varphi (q)+{\sqrt {2\varphi ^{2}\left(q^{2}\right)-\varphi ^{2}(q)}}\\3\varphi \left(q^{9}\right)&=\varphi (q)+{\sqrt[{3}]{9{\frac {\varphi ^{4}\left(q^{3}\right)}{\varphi (q)}}-\varphi ^{3}(q)}}\\{\sqrt {5}}\varphi \left(q^{25}\right)&=\varphi \left(q^{5}\right)\cot \left({\frac {1}{2}}\arctan \left({\frac {2}{\sqrt {5}}}{\frac {\varphi (q)\varphi \left(q^{5}\right)}{\varphi ^{2}(q)-\varphi ^{2}\left(q^{5}\right)}}{\frac {1+s(q)-s^{2}(q)}{s(q)}}\right)\right)\end{aligned}}} where s ( q ) = s ( e π i τ ) = − R ( − e − π i / ( 5 τ ) ) {\displaystyle s(q)=s\left(e^{\pi i\tau }\right)=-R\left(-e^{-\pi i/(5\tau )}\right)} Rogers–Ramanujan continued fraction :
s ( q ) = tan  ( 1 2 arctan  ( 5 2 φ 2 ( q 5 ) φ 2 ( q ) − 1 2 ) ) cot 2  ( 1 2 arccot  ( 5 2 φ 2 ( q 5 ) φ 2 ( q ) − 1 2 ) ) 5 = e − π i / ( 25 τ ) 1 − e − π i / ( 5 τ ) 1 + e − 2 π i / ( 5 τ ) 1 − ⋱ {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}s(q)&={\sqrt[{5}]{\tan \left({\frac {1}{2}}\arctan \left({\frac {5}{2}}{\frac {\varphi ^{2}\left(q^{5}\right)}{\varphi ^{2}(q)}}-{\frac {1}{2}}\right)\right)\cot ^{2}\left({\frac {1}{2}}\operatorname {arccot} \left({\frac {5}{2}}{\frac {\varphi ^{2}\left(q^{5}\right)}{\varphi ^{2}(q)}}-{\frac {1}{2}}\right)\right)}}\\&={\cfrac {e^{-\pi i/(25\tau )}}{1-{\cfrac {e^{-\pi i/(5\tau )}}{1+{\cfrac {e^{-2\pi i/(5\tau )}}{1-\ddots }}}}}}\end{aligned}}} The mathematician Bruce Berndt  found out further values [ 5]   of the theta function:
φ ( exp  ( − 3 π ) ) = π − 1 Γ ( 4 3 ) 3 / 2 2 − 2 / 3 3 13 / 8 φ ( exp  ( − 2 3 π ) ) = π − 1 Γ ( 4 3 ) 3 / 2 2 − 2 / 3 3 13 / 8 cos  ( 1 24 π ) φ ( exp  ( − 3 3 π ) ) = π − 1 Γ ( 4 3 ) 3 / 2 2 − 2 / 3 3 7 / 8 ( 2 3 + 1 ) φ ( exp  ( − 4 3 π ) ) = π − 1 Γ ( 4 3 ) 3 / 2 2 − 5 / 3 3 13 / 8 ( 1 + cos  ( 1 12 π ) ) φ ( exp  ( − 5 3 π ) ) = π − 1 Γ ( 4 3 ) 3 / 2 2 − 2 / 3 3 5 / 8 sin  ( 1 5 π ) ( 2 5 100 3 + 2 5 10 3 + 3 5 5 + 1 ) {\displaystyle {\begin{array}{lll}\varphi \left(\exp(-{\sqrt {3}}\,\pi )\right)&=&\pi ^{-1}{\Gamma \left({\tfrac {4}{3}}\right)}^{3/2}2^{-2/3}3^{13/8}\\\varphi \left(\exp(-2{\sqrt {3}}\,\pi )\right)&=&\pi ^{-1}{\Gamma \left({\tfrac {4}{3}}\right)}^{3/2}2^{-2/3}3^{13/8}\cos({\tfrac {1}{24}}\pi )\\\varphi \left(\exp(-3{\sqrt {3}}\,\pi )\right)&=&\pi ^{-1}{\Gamma \left({\tfrac {4}{3}}\right)}^{3/2}2^{-2/3}3^{7/8}({\sqrt[{3}]{2}}+1)\\\varphi \left(\exp(-4{\sqrt {3}}\,\pi )\right)&=&\pi ^{-1}{\Gamma \left({\tfrac {4}{3}}\right)}^{3/2}2^{-5/3}3^{13/8}{\Bigl (}1+{\sqrt {\cos({\tfrac {1}{12}}\pi )}}{\Bigr )}\\\varphi \left(\exp(-5{\sqrt {3}}\,\pi )\right)&=&\pi ^{-1}{\Gamma \left({\tfrac {4}{3}}\right)}^{3/2}2^{-2/3}3^{5/8}\sin({\tfrac {1}{5}}\pi )({\tfrac {2}{5}}{\sqrt[{3}]{100}}+{\tfrac {2}{5}}{\sqrt[{3}]{10}}+{\tfrac {3}{5}}{\sqrt {5}}+1)\end{array}}} Further values Many values of the theta function [ 6]   and especially of the shown phi function can be represented in terms of the gamma function:
φ ( exp  ( − 2 π ) ) = π − 1 / 2 Γ ( 9 8 ) Γ ( 5 4 ) − 1 / 2 2 7 / 8 φ ( exp  ( − 2 2 π ) ) = π − 1 / 2 Γ ( 9 8 ) Γ ( 5 4 ) − 1 / 2 2 1 / 8 ( 1 + 2 − 1 ) φ ( exp  ( − 3 2 π ) ) = π − 1 / 2 Γ ( 9 8 ) Γ ( 5 4 ) − 1 / 2 2 3 / 8 3 − 1 / 2 ( 3 + 1 ) tan  ( 5 24 π ) φ ( exp  ( − 4 2 π ) ) = π − 1 / 2 Γ ( 9 8 ) Γ ( 5 4 ) − 1 / 2 2 − 1 / 8 ( 1 + 2 2 − 2 4 ) φ ( exp  ( − 5 2 π ) ) = π − 1 / 2 Γ ( 9 8 ) Γ ( 5 4 ) − 1 / 2 1 15 2 3 / 8 × × [ 5 3 10 + 2 5 ( 5 + 2 + 3 3 3 + 5 + 2 − 3 3 3 ) − ( 2 − 2 ) 25 − 10 5 ] φ ( exp  ( − 6 π ) ) = π − 1 / 2 Γ ( 5 24 ) Γ ( 5 12 ) − 1 / 2 2 − 13 / 24 3 − 1 / 8 sin  ( 5 12 π ) φ ( exp  ( − 1 2 6 π ) ) = π − 1 / 2 Γ ( 5 24 ) Γ ( 5 12 ) − 1 / 2 2 5 / 24 3 − 1 / 8 sin  ( 5 24 π ) {\displaystyle {\begin{array}{lll}\varphi \left(\exp(-{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi )\right)&=&\pi ^{-1/2}\Gamma \left({\tfrac {9}{8}}\right){\Gamma \left({\tfrac {5}{4}}\right)}^{-1/2}2^{7/8}\\\varphi \left(\exp(-2{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi )\right)&=&\pi ^{-1/2}\Gamma \left({\tfrac {9}{8}}\right){\Gamma \left({\tfrac {5}{4}}\right)}^{-1/2}2^{1/8}{\Bigl (}1+{\sqrt {{\sqrt {2}}-1}}{\Bigr )}\\\varphi \left(\exp(-3{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi )\right)&=&\pi ^{-1/2}\Gamma \left({\tfrac {9}{8}}\right){\Gamma \left({\tfrac {5}{4}}\right)}^{-1/2}2^{3/8}3^{-1/2}({\sqrt {3}}+1){\sqrt {\tan({\tfrac {5}{24}}\pi )}}\\\varphi \left(\exp(-4{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi )\right)&=&\pi ^{-1/2}\Gamma \left({\tfrac {9}{8}}\right){\Gamma \left({\tfrac {5}{4}}\right)}^{-1/2}2^{-1/8}{\Bigl (}1+{\sqrt[{4}]{2{\sqrt {2}}-2}}{\Bigr )}\\\varphi \left(\exp(-5{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi )\right)&=&\pi ^{-1/2}\Gamma \left({\tfrac {9}{8}}\right){\Gamma \left({\tfrac {5}{4}}\right)}^{-1/2}{\frac {1}{15}}\,2^{3/8}\times \\&&\times {\biggl [}{\sqrt[{3}]{5}}\,{\sqrt {10+2{\sqrt {5}}}}{\biggl (}{\sqrt[{3}]{5+{\sqrt {2}}+3{\sqrt {3}}}}+{\sqrt[{3}]{5+{\sqrt {2}}-3{\sqrt {3}}}}\,{\biggr )}-{\bigl (}2-{\sqrt {2}}\,{\bigr )}{\sqrt {25-10{\sqrt {5}}}}\,{\biggr ]}\\\varphi \left(\exp(-{\sqrt {6}}\,\pi )\right)&=&\pi ^{-1/2}\Gamma \left({\tfrac {5}{24}}\right){\Gamma \left({\tfrac {5}{12}}\right)}^{-1/2}2^{-13/24}3^{-1/8}{\sqrt {\sin({\tfrac {5}{12}}\pi )}}\\\varphi \left(\exp(-{\tfrac {1}{2}}{\sqrt {6}}\,\pi )\right)&=&\pi ^{-1/2}\Gamma \left({\tfrac {5}{24}}\right){\Gamma \left({\tfrac {5}{12}}\right)}^{-1/2}2^{5/24}3^{-1/8}\sin({\tfrac {5}{24}}\pi )\end{array}}} Nome power theorems Direct power theorems For the transformation of the nome [ 7]   in the theta functions these formulas can be used:
θ 2 ( q 2 ) = 1 2 2 [ θ 3 ( q ) 2 − θ 4 ( q ) 2 ] {\displaystyle \theta _{2}(q^{2})={\tfrac {1}{2}}{\sqrt {2[\theta _{3}(q)^{2}-\theta _{4}(q)^{2}]}}} θ 3 ( q 2 ) = 1 2 2 [ θ 3 ( q ) 2 + θ 4 ( q ) 2 ] {\displaystyle \theta _{3}(q^{2})={\tfrac {1}{2}}{\sqrt {2[\theta _{3}(q)^{2}+\theta _{4}(q)^{2}]}}} θ 4 ( q 2 ) = θ 4 ( q ) θ 3 ( q ) {\displaystyle \theta _{4}(q^{2})={\sqrt {\theta _{4}(q)\theta _{3}(q)}}} The squares of the three theta zero-value functions with the square function as the inner function are also formed in the pattern of the Pythagorean triples  according to the Jacobi identity . Furthermore, those transformations are valid:
θ 3 ( q 4 ) = 1 2 θ 3 ( q ) + 1 2 θ 4 ( q ) {\displaystyle \theta _{3}(q^{4})={\tfrac {1}{2}}\theta _{3}(q)+{\tfrac {1}{2}}\theta _{4}(q)} These formulas can be used to compute the theta values of the cube of the nome:
27 θ 3 ( q 3 ) 8 − 18 θ 3 ( q 3 ) 4 θ 3 ( q ) 4 − θ 3 ( q ) 8 = 8 θ 3 ( q 3 ) 2 θ 3 ( q ) 2 [ 2 θ 4 ( q ) 4 − θ 3 ( q ) 4 ] {\displaystyle 27\,\theta _{3}(q^{3})^{8}-18\,\theta _{3}(q^{3})^{4}\theta _{3}(q)^{4}-\,\theta _{3}(q)^{8}=8\,\theta _{3}(q^{3})^{2}\theta _{3}(q)^{2}[2\,\theta _{4}(q)^{4}-\theta _{3}(q)^{4}]} 27 θ 4 ( q 3 ) 8 − 18 θ 4 ( q 3 ) 4 θ 4 ( q ) 4 − θ 4 ( q ) 8 = 8 θ 4 ( q 3 ) 2 θ 4 ( q ) 2 [ 2 θ 3 ( q ) 4 − θ 4 ( q ) 4 ] {\displaystyle 27\,\theta _{4}(q^{3})^{8}-18\,\theta _{4}(q^{3})^{4}\theta _{4}(q)^{4}-\,\theta _{4}(q)^{8}=8\,\theta _{4}(q^{3})^{2}\theta _{4}(q)^{2}[2\,\theta _{3}(q)^{4}-\theta _{4}(q)^{4}]} And the following formulas can be used to compute the theta values of the fifth power of the nome:
[ θ 3 ( q ) 2 − θ 3 ( q 5 ) 2 ] [ 5 θ 3 ( q 5 ) 2 − θ 3 ( q ) 2 ] 5 = 256 θ 3 ( q 5 ) 2 θ 3 ( q ) 2 θ 4 ( q ) 4 [ θ 3 ( q ) 4 − θ 4 ( q ) 4 ] {\displaystyle [\theta _{3}(q)^{2}-\theta _{3}(q^{5})^{2}][5\,\theta _{3}(q^{5})^{2}-\theta _{3}(q)^{2}]^{5}=256\,\theta _{3}(q^{5})^{2}\theta _{3}(q)^{2}\theta _{4}(q)^{4}[\theta _{3}(q)^{4}-\theta _{4}(q)^{4}]} [ θ 4 ( q 5 ) 2 − θ 4 ( q ) 2 ] [ 5 θ 4 ( q 5 ) 2 − θ 4 ( q ) 2 ] 5 = 256 θ 4 ( q 5 ) 2 θ 4 ( q ) 2 θ 3 ( q ) 4 [ θ 3 ( q ) 4 − θ 4 ( q ) 4 ] {\displaystyle [\theta _{4}(q^{5})^{2}-\theta _{4}(q)^{2}][5\,\theta _{4}(q^{5})^{2}-\theta _{4}(q)^{2}]^{5}=256\,\theta _{4}(q^{5})^{2}\theta _{4}(q)^{2}\theta _{3}(q)^{4}[\theta _{3}(q)^{4}-\theta _{4}(q)^{4}]} The formulas for the theta Nullwert function values from the cube root of the elliptic nome are obtained by contrasting the two real solutions of the corresponding quartic equations:
[ θ 3 ( q 1 / 3 ) 2 θ 3 ( q ) 2 − 3 θ 3 ( q 3 ) 2 θ 3 ( q ) 2 ] 2 = 4 − 4 [ 2 θ 2 ( q ) 2 θ 4 ( q ) 2 θ 3 ( q ) 4 ] 2 / 3 {\displaystyle {\biggl [}{\frac {\theta _{3}(q^{1/3})^{2}}{\theta _{3}(q)^{2}}}-{\frac {3\,\theta _{3}(q^{3})^{2}}{\theta _{3}(q)^{2}}}{\biggr ]}^{2}=4-4{\biggl [}{\frac {2\,\theta _{2}(q)^{2}\theta _{4}(q)^{2}}{\theta _{3}(q)^{4}}}{\biggr ]}^{2/3}} [ 3 θ 4 ( q 3 ) 2 θ 4 ( q ) 2 − θ 4 ( q 1 / 3 ) 2 θ 4 ( q ) 2 ] 2 = 4 + 4 [ 2 θ 2 ( q ) 2 θ 3 ( q ) 2 θ 4 ( q ) 4 ] 2 / 3 {\displaystyle {\biggl [}{\frac {3\,\theta _{4}(q^{3})^{2}}{\theta _{4}(q)^{2}}}-{\frac {\theta _{4}(q^{1/3})^{2}}{\theta _{4}(q)^{2}}}{\biggr ]}^{2}=4+4{\biggl [}{\frac {2\,\theta _{2}(q)^{2}\theta _{3}(q)^{2}}{\theta _{4}(q)^{4}}}{\biggr ]}^{2/3}} Modulus dependent theorems In combination with the elliptic modulus, the following formulas can be displayed:
These are the formulas for the square of the elliptic nome:
θ 4 [ q ( k ) ] = θ 4 [ q ( k ) 2 ] 1 − k 2 8 {\displaystyle \theta _{4}[q(k)]=\theta _{4}[q(k)^{2}]{\sqrt[{8}]{1-k^{2}}}} θ 4 [ q ( k ) 2 ] = θ 3 [ q ( k ) ] 1 − k 2 8 {\displaystyle \theta _{4}[q(k)^{2}]=\theta _{3}[q(k)]{\sqrt[{8}]{1-k^{2}}}} θ 3 [ q ( k ) 2 ] = θ 3 [ q ( k ) ] cos  [ 1 2 arcsin  ( k ) ] {\displaystyle \theta _{3}[q(k)^{2}]=\theta _{3}[q(k)]\cos[{\tfrac {1}{2}}\arcsin(k)]} And this is an efficient formula for the cube of the nome:
θ 4 ⟨ q { tan  [ 1 2 arctan  ( t 3 ) ] } 3 ⟩ = θ 4 ⟨ q { tan  [ 1 2 arctan  ( t 3 ) ] } ⟩ 3 − 1 / 2 ( 2 t 4 − t 2 + 1 − t 2 + 2 + t 2 + 1 ) 1 / 2 {\displaystyle \theta _{4}{\biggl \langle }q{\bigl \{}\tan {\bigl [}{\tfrac {1}{2}}\arctan(t^{3}){\bigr ]}{\bigr \}}^{3}{\biggr \rangle }=\theta _{4}{\biggl \langle }q{\bigl \{}\tan {\bigl [}{\tfrac {1}{2}}\arctan(t^{3}){\bigr ]}{\bigr \}}{\biggr \rangle }\,3^{-1/2}{\bigl (}{\sqrt {2{\sqrt {t^{4}-t^{2}+1}}-t^{2}+2}}+{\sqrt {t^{2}+1}}\,{\bigr )}^{1/2}} For all real values t ∈ R {\displaystyle t\in \mathbb {R} } 
And for this formula two examples shall be given:
First calculation example with the value t = 1 {\displaystyle t=1} 
θ 4 ⟨ q { tan  [ 1 2 arctan  ( 1 ) ] } 3 ⟩ = θ 4 ⟨ q { tan  [ 1 2 arctan  ( 1 ) ] } ⟩ 3 − 1 / 2 ( 3 + 2 ) 1 / 2 {\displaystyle \theta _{4}{\biggl \langle }q{\bigl \{}\tan {\bigl [}{\tfrac {1}{2}}\arctan(1){\bigr ]}{\bigr \}}^{3}{\biggr \rangle }=\theta _{4}{\biggl \langle }q{\bigl \{}\tan {\bigl [}{\tfrac {1}{2}}\arctan(1){\bigr ]}{\bigr \}}{\biggr \rangle }\,3^{-1/2}{\bigl (}{\sqrt {3}}+{\sqrt {2}}\,{\bigr )}^{1/2}} θ 4 [ exp  ( − 3 2 π ) ] = θ 4 [ exp  ( − 2 π ) ] 3 − 1 / 2 ( 3 + 2 ) 1 / 2 {\displaystyle \theta _{4}{\bigl [}\exp(-3{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi ){\bigr ]}=\theta _{4}{\bigl [}\exp(-{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi ){\bigr ]}\,3^{-1/2}{\bigl (}{\sqrt {3}}+{\sqrt {2}}\,{\bigr )}^{1/2}} 
Second calculation example with the value t = Φ − 2 {\displaystyle t=\Phi ^{-2}} 
θ 4 ⟨ q { tan  [ 1 2 arctan  ( Φ − 6 ) ] } 3 ⟩ = θ 4 ⟨ q { tan  [ 1 2 arctan  ( Φ − 6 ) ] } ⟩ 3 − 1 / 2 ( 2 Φ − 8 − Φ − 4 + 1 − Φ − 4 + 2 + Φ − 4 + 1 ) 1 / 2 {\displaystyle \theta _{4}{\biggl \langle }q{\bigl \{}\tan {\bigl [}{\tfrac {1}{2}}\arctan(\Phi ^{-6}){\bigr ]}{\bigr \}}^{3}{\biggr \rangle }=\theta _{4}{\biggl \langle }q{\bigl \{}\tan {\bigl [}{\tfrac {1}{2}}\arctan(\Phi ^{-6}){\bigr ]}{\bigr \}}{\biggr \rangle }\,3^{-1/2}{\bigl (}{\sqrt {2{\sqrt {\Phi ^{-8}-\Phi ^{-4}+1}}-\Phi ^{-4}+2}}+{\sqrt {\Phi ^{-4}+1}}\,{\bigr )}^{1/2}} θ 4 [ exp  ( − 3 10 π ) ] = θ 4 [ exp  ( − 10 π ) ] 3 − 1 / 2 ( 2 Φ − 8 − Φ − 4 + 1 − Φ − 4 + 2 + Φ − 4 + 1 ) 1 / 2 {\displaystyle \theta _{4}{\bigl [}\exp(-3{\sqrt {10}}\,\pi ){\bigr ]}=\theta _{4}{\bigl [}\exp(-{\sqrt {10}}\,\pi ){\bigr ]}\,3^{-1/2}{\bigl (}{\sqrt {2{\sqrt {\Phi ^{-8}-\Phi ^{-4}+1}}-\Phi ^{-4}+2}}+{\sqrt {\Phi ^{-4}+1}}\,{\bigr )}^{1/2}} 
The constant Φ {\displaystyle \Phi } golden ratio  number Φ = 1 2 ( 5 + 1 ) {\displaystyle \Phi ={\tfrac {1}{2}}({\sqrt {5}}+1)} 
Some series identities Sums with theta function in the result The infinite sum [ 8]   [ 9]   of the reciprocals of Fibonacci numbers  with odd indices has the identity:
∑ n = 1 ∞ 1 F 2 n − 1 = 5 2 ∑ n = 1 ∞ 2 ( Φ − 2 ) n − 1 / 2 1 + ( Φ − 2 ) 2 n − 1 = 5 4 ∑ a = − ∞ ∞ 2 ( Φ − 2 ) a − 1 / 2 1 + ( Φ − 2 ) 2 a − 1 = {\displaystyle \sum _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {1}{F_{2n-1}}}={\frac {\sqrt {5}}{2}}\,\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {2(\Phi ^{-2})^{n-1/2}}{1+(\Phi ^{-2})^{2n-1}}}={\frac {\sqrt {5}}{4}}\sum _{a=-\infty }^{\infty }{\frac {2(\Phi ^{-2})^{a-1/2}}{1+(\Phi ^{-2})^{2a-1}}}=} = 5 4 θ 2 ( Φ − 2 ) 2 = 5 8 [ θ 3 ( Φ − 1 ) 2 − θ 4 ( Φ − 1 ) 2 ] {\displaystyle ={\frac {\sqrt {5}}{4}}\,\theta _{2}(\Phi ^{-2})^{2}={\frac {\sqrt {5}}{8}}{\bigl [}\theta _{3}(\Phi ^{-1})^{2}-\theta _{4}(\Phi ^{-1})^{2}{\bigr ]}} By not using the theta function expression, following identity between two sums can be formulated:
∑ n = 1 ∞ 1 F 2 n − 1 = 5 4 [ ∑ n = 1 ∞ 2 Φ − ( 2 n − 1 ) 2 / 2 ] 2 {\displaystyle \sum _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {1}{F_{2n-1}}}={\frac {\sqrt {5}}{4}}\,{\biggl [}\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }2\,\Phi ^{-(2n-1)^{2}/2}{\biggr ]}^{2}} ∑ n = 1 ∞ 1 F 2 n − 1 = 1.82451515740692456814215840626732817332 … {\displaystyle \sum _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {1}{F_{2n-1}}}=1.82451515740692456814215840626732817332\ldots } Also in this case Φ = 1 2 ( 5 + 1 ) {\displaystyle \Phi ={\tfrac {1}{2}}({\sqrt {5}}+1)} Golden ratio  number again.
Infinite sum of the reciprocals of the Fibonacci number squares:
∑ n = 1 ∞ 1 F n 2 = 5 24 [ 2 θ 2 ( Φ − 2 ) 4 − θ 3 ( Φ − 2 ) 4 + 1 ] = 5 24 [ θ 3 ( Φ − 2 ) 4 − 2 θ 4 ( Φ − 2 ) 4 + 1 ] {\displaystyle \sum _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {1}{F_{n}^{2}}}={\frac {5}{24}}{\bigl [}2\,\theta _{2}(\Phi ^{-2})^{4}-\theta _{3}(\Phi ^{-2})^{4}+1{\bigr ]}={\frac {5}{24}}{\bigl [}\theta _{3}(\Phi ^{-2})^{4}-2\,\theta _{4}(\Phi ^{-2})^{4}+1{\bigr ]}} Infinite sum of the reciprocals of the Pell numbers  with odd indices:
∑ n = 1 ∞ 1 P 2 n − 1 = 1 2 θ 2 [ ( 2 − 1 ) 2 ] 2 = 1 2 2 [ θ 3 ( 2 − 1 ) 2 − θ 4 ( 2 − 1 ) 2 ] {\displaystyle \sum _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {1}{P_{2n-1}}}={\frac {1}{\sqrt {2}}}\,\theta _{2}{\bigl [}({\sqrt {2}}-1)^{2}{\bigr ]}^{2}={\frac {1}{2{\sqrt {2}}}}{\bigl [}\theta _{3}({\sqrt {2}}-1)^{2}-\theta _{4}({\sqrt {2}}-1)^{2}{\bigr ]}} Sums with theta function in the summand The next two series identities were proved by István Mező : [ 10]  
θ 4 2 ( q ) = i q 1 4 ∑ k = − ∞ ∞ q 2 k 2 − k θ 1 ( 2 k − 1 2 i ln  q , q ) , θ 4 2 ( q ) = ∑ k = − ∞ ∞ q 2 k 2 θ 4 ( k ln  q i , q ) . {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\theta _{4}^{2}(q)&=iq^{\frac {1}{4}}\sum _{k=-\infty }^{\infty }q^{2k^{2}-k}\theta _{1}\left({\frac {2k-1}{2i}}\ln q,q\right),\\[6pt]\theta _{4}^{2}(q)&=\sum _{k=-\infty }^{\infty }q^{2k^{2}}\theta _{4}\left({\frac {k\ln q}{i}},q\right).\end{aligned}}} These relations hold for all 0 < q  < 1 . Specializing the values of q , we have the next parameter free sums
π e π 2 ⋅ 1 Γ 2 ( 3 4 ) = i ∑ k = − ∞ ∞ e π ( k − 2 k 2 ) θ 1 ( i π 2 ( 2 k − 1 ) , e − π ) {\displaystyle {\sqrt {\frac {\pi {\sqrt {e^{\pi }}}}{2}}}\cdot {\frac {1}{\Gamma ^{2}\left({\frac {3}{4}}\right)}}=i\sum _{k=-\infty }^{\infty }e^{\pi \left(k-2k^{2}\right)}\theta _{1}\left({\frac {i\pi }{2}}(2k-1),e^{-\pi }\right)} π 2 ⋅ 1 Γ 2 ( 3 4 ) = ∑ k = − ∞ ∞ θ 4 ( i k π , e − π ) e 2 π k 2 {\displaystyle {\sqrt {\frac {\pi }{2}}}\cdot {\frac {1}{\Gamma ^{2}\left({\frac {3}{4}}\right)}}=\sum _{k=-\infty }^{\infty }{\frac {\theta _{4}\left(ik\pi ,e^{-\pi }\right)}{e^{2\pi k^{2}}}}} Zeros of the Jacobi theta functions All zeros of the Jacobi theta functions are simple zeros and are given by the following:
ϑ ( z ; τ ) = ϑ 00 ( z ; τ ) = 0 ⟺ z = m + n τ + 1 2 + τ 2 ϑ 11 ( z ; τ ) = 0 ⟺ z = m + n τ ϑ 10 ( z ; τ ) = 0 ⟺ z = m + n τ + 1 2 ϑ 01 ( z ; τ ) = 0 ⟺ z = m + n τ + τ 2 {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\vartheta (z;\tau )=\vartheta _{00}(z;\tau )&=0\quad &\Longleftrightarrow &&\quad z&=m+n\tau +{\frac {1}{2}}+{\frac {\tau }{2}}\\[3pt]\vartheta _{11}(z;\tau )&=0\quad &\Longleftrightarrow &&\quad z&=m+n\tau \\[3pt]\vartheta _{10}(z;\tau )&=0\quad &\Longleftrightarrow &&\quad z&=m+n\tau +{\frac {1}{2}}\\[3pt]\vartheta _{01}(z;\tau )&=0\quad &\Longleftrightarrow &&\quad z&=m+n\tau +{\frac {\tau }{2}}\end{aligned}}} where m , n  are arbitrary integers.
Relation to the Riemann zeta function The relation
ϑ ( 0 ; − 1 τ ) = ( − i τ ) 1 2 ϑ ( 0 ; τ ) {\displaystyle \vartheta \left(0;-{\frac {1}{\tau }}\right)=\left(-i\tau \right)^{\frac {1}{2}}\vartheta (0;\tau )} was used by Riemann  to prove the functional equation for the Riemann zeta function , by means of the Mellin transform  
Γ ( s 2 ) π − s 2 ζ ( s ) = 1 2 ∫ 0 ∞ ( ϑ ( 0 ; i t ) − 1 ) t s 2 d t t {\displaystyle \Gamma \left({\frac {s}{2}}\right)\pi ^{-{\frac {s}{2}}}\zeta (s)={\frac {1}{2}}\int _{0}^{\infty }{\bigl (}\vartheta (0;it)-1{\bigr )}t^{\frac {s}{2}}{\frac {\mathrm {d} t}{t}}} which can be shown to be invariant under substitution of s  by 1 − s  . The corresponding integral for z  ≠ 0Hurwitz zeta function .
Relation to the Weierstrass elliptic function The theta function was used by Jacobi to construct (in a form adapted to easy calculation) his elliptic functions  as the quotients of the above four theta functions, and could have been used by him to construct Weierstrass's elliptic functions  also, since
℘ ( z ; τ ) = − ( log  ϑ 11 ( z ; τ ) ) ″ + c {\displaystyle \wp (z;\tau )=-{\big (}\log \vartheta _{11}(z;\tau ){\big )}''+c} where the second derivative is with respect to z  and the constant c  is defined so that the Laurent expansion  of ℘(z )  at z  = 0constant term .
Relation to the q -gamma function The fourth theta function – and thus the others too – is intimately connected to the Jackson q -gamma function  via the relation [ 11]  
( Γ q 2 ( x ) Γ q 2 ( 1 − x ) ) − 1 = q 2 x ( 1 − x ) ( q − 2 ; q − 2 ) ∞ 3 ( q 2 − 1 ) θ 4 ( 1 2 i ( 1 − 2 x ) log  q , 1 q ) . {\displaystyle \left(\Gamma _{q^{2}}(x)\Gamma _{q^{2}}(1-x)\right)^{-1}={\frac {q^{2x(1-x)}}{\left(q^{-2};q^{-2}\right)_{\infty }^{3}\left(q^{2}-1\right)}}\theta _{4}\left({\frac {1}{2i}}(1-2x)\log q,{\frac {1}{q}}\right).} Relations to Dedekind eta function Let η (τ )Dedekind eta function , and the argument of the theta function as the nome  q  = e πiτ 
θ 2 ( q ) = ϑ 10 ( 0 ; τ ) = 2 η 2 ( 2 τ ) η ( τ ) , θ 3 ( q ) = ϑ 00 ( 0 ; τ ) = η 5 ( τ ) η 2 ( 1 2 τ ) η 2 ( 2 τ ) = η 2 ( 1 2 ( τ + 1 ) ) η ( τ + 1 ) , θ 4 ( q ) = ϑ 01 ( 0 ; τ ) = η 2 ( 1 2 τ ) η ( τ ) , {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\theta _{2}(q)=\vartheta _{10}(0;\tau )&={\frac {2\eta ^{2}(2\tau )}{\eta (\tau )}},\\[3pt]\theta _{3}(q)=\vartheta _{00}(0;\tau )&={\frac {\eta ^{5}(\tau )}{\eta ^{2}\left({\frac {1}{2}}\tau \right)\eta ^{2}(2\tau )}}={\frac {\eta ^{2}\left({\frac {1}{2}}(\tau +1)\right)}{\eta (\tau +1)}},\\[3pt]\theta _{4}(q)=\vartheta _{01}(0;\tau )&={\frac {\eta ^{2}\left({\frac {1}{2}}\tau \right)}{\eta (\tau )}},\end{aligned}}} and,
θ 2 ( q ) θ 3 ( q ) θ 4 ( q ) = 2 η 3 ( τ ) . {\displaystyle \theta _{2}(q)\,\theta _{3}(q)\,\theta _{4}(q)=2\eta ^{3}(\tau ).} See also the Weber modular functions .
Elliptic modulus The elliptic modulus  is
k ( τ ) = ϑ 10 ( 0 ; τ ) 2 ϑ 00 ( 0 ; τ ) 2 {\displaystyle k(\tau )={\frac {\vartheta _{10}(0;\tau )^{2}}{\vartheta _{00}(0;\tau )^{2}}}} and the complementary elliptic modulus is
k ′ ( τ ) = ϑ 01 ( 0 ; τ ) 2 ϑ 00 ( 0 ; τ ) 2 {\displaystyle k'(\tau )={\frac {\vartheta _{01}(0;\tau )^{2}}{\vartheta _{00}(0;\tau )^{2}}}} Derivatives of theta functions These are two identical definitions of the complete elliptic integral  of the second kind:
E ( k ) = ∫ 0 π / 2 1 − k 2 sin  ( φ ) 2 d φ {\displaystyle E(k)=\int _{0}^{\pi /2}{\sqrt {1-k^{2}\sin(\varphi )^{2}}}d\varphi } E ( k ) = π 2 ∑ a = 0 ∞ [ ( 2 a ) ! ] 2 ( 1 − 2 a ) 16 a ( a ! ) 4 k 2 a {\displaystyle E(k)={\frac {\pi }{2}}\sum _{a=0}^{\infty }{\frac {[(2a)!]^{2}}{(1-2a)16^{a}(a!)^{4}}}k^{2a}} The derivatives of the Theta Nullwert functions have these MacLaurin series:
θ 2 ′ ( x ) = d d x θ 2 ( x ) = 1 2 x − 3 / 4 + ∑ n = 1 ∞ 1 2 ( 2 n + 1 ) 2 x ( 2 n − 1 ) ( 2 n + 3 ) / 4 {\displaystyle \theta _{2}'(x)={\frac {\mathrm {d} }{\mathrm {d} x}}\,\theta _{2}(x)={\frac {1}{2}}x^{-3/4}+\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {1}{2}}(2n+1)^{2}x^{(2n-1)(2n+3)/4}} θ 3 ′ ( x ) = d d x θ 3 ( x ) = 2 + ∑ n = 1 ∞ 2 ( n + 1 ) 2 x n ( n + 2 ) {\displaystyle \theta _{3}'(x)={\frac {\mathrm {d} }{\mathrm {d} x}}\,\theta _{3}(x)=2+\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }2(n+1)^{2}x^{n(n+2)}} θ 4 ′ ( x ) = d d x θ 4 ( x ) = − 2 + ∑ n = 1 ∞ 2 ( n + 1 ) 2 ( − 1 ) n + 1 x n ( n + 2 ) {\displaystyle \theta _{4}'(x)={\frac {\mathrm {d} }{\mathrm {d} x}}\,\theta _{4}(x)=-2+\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }2(n+1)^{2}(-1)^{n+1}x^{n(n+2)}} The derivatives of theta zero-value functions [ 12]   are as follows:
θ 2 ′ ( x ) = d d x θ 2 ( x ) = 1 2 π x θ 2 ( x ) θ 3 ( x ) 2 E [ θ 2 ( x ) 2 θ 3 ( x ) 2 ] {\displaystyle \theta _{2}'(x)={\frac {\mathrm {d} }{\mathrm {d} x}}\,\theta _{2}(x)={\frac {1}{2\pi x}}\theta _{2}(x)\theta _{3}(x)^{2}E{\biggl [}{\frac {\theta _{2}(x)^{2}}{\theta _{3}(x)^{2}}}{\biggr ]}} θ 3 ′ ( x ) = d d x θ 3 ( x ) = θ 3 ( x ) [ θ 3 ( x ) 2 + θ 4 ( x ) 2 ] { 1 2 π x E [ θ 3 ( x ) 2 − θ 4 ( x ) 2 θ 3 ( x ) 2 + θ 4 ( x ) 2 ] − θ 4 ( x ) 2 4 x } {\displaystyle \theta _{3}'(x)={\frac {\mathrm {d} }{\mathrm {d} x}}\,\theta _{3}(x)=\theta _{3}(x){\bigl [}\theta _{3}(x)^{2}+\theta _{4}(x)^{2}{\bigr ]}{\biggl \{}{\frac {1}{2\pi x}}E{\biggl [}{\frac {\theta _{3}(x)^{2}-\theta _{4}(x)^{2}}{\theta _{3}(x)^{2}+\theta _{4}(x)^{2}}}{\biggr ]}-{\frac {\theta _{4}(x)^{2}}{4\,x}}{\biggr \}}} θ 4 ′ ( x ) = d d x θ 4 ( x ) = θ 4 ( x ) [ θ 3 ( x ) 2 + θ 4 ( x ) 2 ] { 1 2 π x E [ θ 3 ( x ) 2 − θ 4 ( x ) 2 θ 3 ( x ) 2 + θ 4 ( x ) 2 ] − θ 3 ( x ) 2 4 x } {\displaystyle \theta _{4}'(x)={\frac {\mathrm {d} }{\mathrm {d} x}}\,\theta _{4}(x)=\theta _{4}(x){\bigl [}\theta _{3}(x)^{2}+\theta _{4}(x)^{2}{\bigr ]}{\biggl \{}{\frac {1}{2\pi x}}E{\biggl [}{\frac {\theta _{3}(x)^{2}-\theta _{4}(x)^{2}}{\theta _{3}(x)^{2}+\theta _{4}(x)^{2}}}{\biggr ]}-{\frac {\theta _{3}(x)^{2}}{4\,x}}{\biggr \}}} The two last mentioned formulas are valid for all real numbers of the real definition interval: − 1 < x < 1 ∩ x ∈ R {\displaystyle -1<x<1\,\cap \,x\in \mathbb {R} } 
And these two last named theta derivative functions are related to each other in this way:
ϑ 4 ( x ) [ d d x ϑ 3 ( x ) ] − ϑ 3 ( x ) [ d d x θ 4 ( x ) ] = 1 4 x θ 3 ( x ) θ 4 ( x ) [ θ 3 ( x ) 4 − θ 4 ( x ) 4 ] {\displaystyle \vartheta _{4}(x){\biggl [}{\frac {\mathrm {d} }{\mathrm {d} x}}\,\vartheta _{3}(x){\biggr ]}-\vartheta _{3}(x){\biggl [}{\frac {\mathrm {d} }{\mathrm {d} x}}\,\theta _{4}(x){\biggr ]}={\frac {1}{4\,x}}\,\theta _{3}(x)\,\theta _{4}(x){\bigl [}\theta _{3}(x)^{4}-\theta _{4}(x)^{4}{\bigr ]}} The derivatives of the quotients from two of the three theta functions mentioned here always have a rational relationship to those three functions:
d d x θ 2 ( x ) θ 3 ( x ) = θ 2 ( x ) θ 4 ( x ) 4 4 x θ 3 ( x ) {\displaystyle {\frac {\mathrm {d} }{\mathrm {d} x}}\,{\frac {\theta _{2}(x)}{\theta _{3}(x)}}={\frac {\theta _{2}(x)\,\theta _{4}(x)^{4}}{4\,x\,\theta _{3}(x)}}} d d x θ 2 ( x ) θ 4 ( x ) = θ 2 ( x ) θ 3 ( x ) 4 4 x θ 4 ( x ) {\displaystyle {\frac {\mathrm {d} }{\mathrm {d} x}}\,{\frac {\theta _{2}(x)}{\theta _{4}(x)}}={\frac {\theta _{2}(x)\,\theta _{3}(x)^{4}}{4\,x\,\theta _{4}(x)}}} d d x θ 3 ( x ) θ 4 ( x ) = θ 3 ( x ) 5 − θ 3 ( x ) θ 4 ( x ) 4 4 x θ 4 ( x ) {\displaystyle {\frac {\mathrm {d} }{\mathrm {d} x}}\,{\frac {\theta _{3}(x)}{\theta _{4}(x)}}={\frac {\theta _{3}(x)^{5}-\theta _{3}(x)\,\theta _{4}(x)^{4}}{4\,x\,\theta _{4}(x)}}} For the derivation of these derivation formulas see the articles Nome (mathematics)  and Modular lambda function !
Integrals of theta functions For the theta functions these integrals [ 13]   are valid:
∫ 0 1 θ 2 ( x ) d x = ∑ k = − ∞ ∞ 4 ( 2 k + 1 ) 2 + 4 = π tanh  ( π ) ≈ 3.129881 {\displaystyle \int _{0}^{1}\theta _{2}(x)\,\mathrm {d} x=\sum _{k=-\infty }^{\infty }{\frac {4}{(2k+1)^{2}+4}}=\pi \tanh(\pi )\approx 3.129881} ∫ 0 1 θ 3 ( x ) d x = ∑ k = − ∞ ∞ 1 k 2 + 1 = π coth  ( π ) ≈ 3.153348 {\displaystyle \int _{0}^{1}\theta _{3}(x)\,\mathrm {d} x=\sum _{k=-\infty }^{\infty }{\frac {1}{k^{2}+1}}=\pi \coth(\pi )\approx 3.153348} ∫ 0 1 θ 4 ( x ) d x = ∑ k = − ∞ ∞ ( − 1 ) k k 2 + 1 = π csch  ( π ) ≈ 0.272029 {\displaystyle \int _{0}^{1}\theta _{4}(x)\,\mathrm {d} x=\sum _{k=-\infty }^{\infty }{\frac {(-1)^{k}}{k^{2}+1}}=\pi \,\operatorname {csch} (\pi )\approx 0.272029} The final results now shown are based on the general Cauchy sum formulas.
A solution to the heat equation The Jacobi theta function is the fundamental solution  of the one-dimensional heat equation  with spatially periodic boundary conditions. [ 14]    Taking z  = x τ  = it t  real and positive, we can write
ϑ ( x ; i t ) = 1 + 2 ∑ n = 1 ∞ exp  ( − π n 2 t ) cos  ( 2 π n x ) {\displaystyle \vartheta (x;it)=1+2\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }\exp \left(-\pi n^{2}t\right)\cos(2\pi nx)} which solves the heat equation
∂ ∂ t ϑ ( x ; i t ) = 1 4 π ∂ 2 ∂ x 2 ϑ ( x ; i t ) . {\displaystyle {\frac {\partial }{\partial t}}\vartheta (x;it)={\frac {1}{4\pi }}{\frac {\partial ^{2}}{\partial x^{2}}}\vartheta (x;it).} This theta-function solution is 1-periodic in x , and as t  → 0delta function , or Dirac comb , in the sense of distributions  
lim t → 0 ϑ ( x ; i t ) = ∑ n = − ∞ ∞ δ ( x − n ) {\displaystyle \lim _{t\to 0}\vartheta (x;it)=\sum _{n=-\infty }^{\infty }\delta (x-n)} General solutions of the spatially periodic initial value problem  for the heat equation may be obtained by convolving the initial data at t  = 0
Relation to the Heisenberg group The Jacobi theta function is invariant under the action of a discrete subgroup of the Heisenberg group . This invariance is presented in the article on the theta representation  of the Heisenberg group.
Generalizations If F  is a quadratic form  in n  variables, then the theta function associated with F  is
θ F ( z ) = ∑ m ∈ Z n e 2 π i z F ( m ) {\displaystyle \theta _{F}(z)=\sum _{m\in \mathbb {Z} ^{n}}e^{2\pi izF(m)}} with the sum extending over the lattice  of integers Z n {\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} ^{n}} modular form  of weight  n / 2  modular group .  In the Fourier expansion,
θ ^ F ( z ) = ∑ k = 0 ∞ R F ( k ) e 2 π i k z , {\displaystyle {\hat {\theta }}_{F}(z)=\sum _{k=0}^{\infty }R_{F}(k)e^{2\pi ikz},} the numbers RF  (k )representation numbers  of the form.
Theta series of a Dirichlet character For χ  a primitive Dirichlet character  modulo q  and ν  =  1 − χ (−1) / 2  
θ χ ( z ) = 1 2 ∑ n = − ∞ ∞ χ ( n ) n ν e 2 i π n 2 z {\displaystyle \theta _{\chi }(z)={\frac {1}{2}}\sum _{n=-\infty }^{\infty }\chi (n)n^{\nu }e^{2i\pi n^{2}z}} is a weight  1 / 2  ν 4q 2   and character
χ ( d ) ( − 1 d ) ν , {\displaystyle \chi (d)\left({\frac {-1}{d}}\right)^{\nu },} which means [ 15]  
θ χ ( a z + b c z + d ) = χ ( d ) ( − 1 d ) ν ( θ 1 ( a z + b c z + d ) θ 1 ( z ) ) 1 + 2 ν θ χ ( z ) {\displaystyle \theta _{\chi }\left({\frac {az+b}{cz+d}}\right)=\chi (d)\left({\frac {-1}{d}}\right)^{\nu }\left({\frac {\theta _{1}\left({\frac {az+b}{cz+d}}\right)}{\theta _{1}(z)}}\right)^{1+2\nu }\theta _{\chi }(z)} whenever
a , b , c , d ∈ Z 4 , a d − b c = 1 , c ≡ 0 mod 4 q 2 . {\displaystyle a,b,c,d\in \mathbb {Z} ^{4},ad-bc=1,c\equiv 0{\bmod {4}}q^{2}.} Riemann theta function Let
H n = { F ∈ M ( n , C ) | F = F T , Im  F > 0 } {\displaystyle \mathbb {H} _{n}=\left\{F\in M(n,\mathbb {C} )\,{\big |}\,F=F^{\mathsf {T}}\,,\,\operatorname {Im} F>0\right\}} be the set of symmetric  square matrices  whose imaginary part is positive definite . H n {\displaystyle \mathbb {H} _{n}} Siegel upper half-space  and is the multi-dimensional analog of the upper half-plane . The n -dimensional analogue of the modular group  is the symplectic group  Sp  ( 2 n , Z ) {\displaystyle \operatorname {Sp} (2n,\mathbb {Z} )} n  = 1Sp  ( 2 , Z ) = SL  ( 2 , Z ) {\displaystyle \operatorname {Sp} (2,\mathbb {Z} )=\operatorname {SL} (2,\mathbb {Z} )} n -dimensional analogue of the congruence subgroups  is played by
ker  { Sp  ( 2 n , Z ) → Sp  ( 2 n , Z / k Z ) } . {\displaystyle \ker {\big \{}\operatorname {Sp} (2n,\mathbb {Z} )\to \operatorname {Sp} (2n,\mathbb {Z} /k\mathbb {Z} ){\big \}}.} Then, given τ ∈ H n {\displaystyle \tau \in \mathbb {H} _{n}} Riemann theta function  is defined as
θ ( z , τ ) = ∑ m ∈ Z n exp  ( 2 π i ( 1 2 m T τ m + m T z ) ) . {\displaystyle \theta (z,\tau )=\sum _{m\in \mathbb {Z} ^{n}}\exp \left(2\pi i\left({\tfrac {1}{2}}m^{\mathsf {T}}\tau m+m^{\mathsf {T}}z\right)\right).} Here, z ∈ C n {\displaystyle z\in \mathbb {C} ^{n}} n -dimensional complex vector, and the superscript T  denotes the transpose . The Jacobi theta function is then a special case, with n  = 1τ i n H {\displaystyle \tau in\mathbb {H} } H {\displaystyle \mathbb {H} } upper half-plane . One major application of the Riemann theta function is that it allows one to give explicit formulas for meromorphic functions on compact Riemann surfaces , as well as other auxiliary objects that figure prominently in their function theory, by taking τ  to be the period matrix with respect to a canonical basis for its first homology group .
The Riemann theta converges absolutely and uniformly on compact subsets of C n × H n {\displaystyle \mathbb {C} ^{n}\times \mathbb {H} _{n}} 
The functional equation is
θ ( z + a + τ b , τ ) = exp  ( 2 π i ( − b T z − 1 2 b T τ b ) ) θ ( z , τ ) {\displaystyle \theta (z+a+\tau b,\tau )=\exp \left(2\pi i\left(-b^{\mathsf {T}}z-{\tfrac {1}{2}}b^{\mathsf {T}}\tau b\right)\right)\theta (z,\tau )} which holds for all vectors a , b ∈ Z n {\displaystyle a,b\in \mathbb {Z} ^{n}} z ∈ C n {\displaystyle z\in \mathbb {C} ^{n}} τ ∈ H n {\displaystyle \tau \in \mathbb {H} _{n}} 
Derivation of the theta values Identity of the Euler beta function In the following, three important theta function values are to be derived as examples:
This is how the Euler beta function  is defined in its reduced form:
β ( x ) = Γ ( x ) 2 Γ ( 2 x ) {\displaystyle \beta (x)={\frac {\Gamma (x)^{2}}{\Gamma (2x)}}} In general, for all natural numbers n ∈ N {\displaystyle n\in \mathbb {N} } 
4 − 1 / ( n + 2 ) n + 2 csc  ( π n + 2 ) β [ n 2 ( n + 2 ) ] = ∫ 0 ∞ 1 x n + 2 + 1 d x {\displaystyle {\frac {4^{-1/(n+2)}}{n+2}}\csc {\bigl (}{\frac {\pi }{n+2}}{\bigr )}\beta {\biggl [}{\frac {n}{2(n+2)}}{\biggr ]}=\int _{0}^{\infty }{\frac {1}{\sqrt {x^{n+2}+1}}}\,\mathrm {d} x} Exemplary elliptic integrals In the following some Elliptic Integral Singular Values  [ 16]   are derived:
And the following function has the following elliptic antiderivative:
1 x 8 + 1 = {\displaystyle {\frac {1}{\sqrt {x^{8}+1}}}=} = d d x 1 4 sec  ( π 8 ) F { 2 arctan  [ 2 cos  ( π / 8 ) x x 4 + 2 x 2 + 1 − x 2 + 1 ] ; 2 2 4 sin  ( π 8 ) } + 1 4 sec  ( π 8 ) F { arcsin  [ 2 cos  ( π / 8 ) x x 2 + 1 ] ; tan  ( π 8 ) } {\displaystyle ={\frac {\mathrm {d} }{\mathrm {d} x}}\,{\frac {1}{4}}\sec {\bigl (}{\frac {\pi }{8}}{\bigr )}F{\biggl \{}2\arctan {\biggl [}{\frac {2\cos(\pi /8)\,x}{{\sqrt {x^{4}+{\sqrt {2}}\,x^{2}+1}}-x^{2}+1}}{\biggr ]};2{\sqrt[{4}]{2}}\sin {\bigl (}{\frac {\pi }{8}}{\bigr )}{\biggr \}}+{\frac {1}{4}}\sec {\bigl (}{\frac {\pi }{8}}{\bigr )}F{\biggl \{}\arcsin {\biggl [}{\frac {2\cos(\pi /8)\,x}{x^{2}+1}}{\biggr ]};\tan {\bigl (}{\frac {\pi }{8}}{\bigr )}{\biggr \}}} For the value n = 6 {\displaystyle n=6} 
1 8 2 4 csc  ( π 8 ) β ( 3 8 ) = ∫ 0 ∞ 1 x 8 + 1 d x = {\displaystyle {\frac {1}{8{\sqrt[{4}]{2}}}}\csc {\bigl (}{\frac {\pi }{8}}{\bigr )}\beta {\bigl (}{\frac {3}{8}}{\bigr )}=\int _{0}^{\infty }{\frac {1}{\sqrt {x^{8}+1}}}\,\mathrm {d} x=} = ⟨ 1 4 sec  ( π 8 ) F { 2 arctan  [ 2 cos  ( π / 8 ) x x 4 + 2 x 2 + 1 − x 2 + 1 ] ; 2 2 4 sin  ( π 8 ) } + 1 4 sec  ( π 8 ) F { arcsin  [ 2 cos  ( π / 8 ) x x 2 + 1 ] ; tan  ( π 8 ) } ⟩ x = 0 x = ∞ = {\displaystyle ={\biggl \langle }{\color {blue}{\frac {1}{4}}\sec {\bigl (}{\frac {\pi }{8}}{\bigr )}F{\biggl \{}2\arctan {\biggl [}{\frac {2\cos(\pi /8)\,x}{{\sqrt {x^{4}+{\sqrt {2}}\,x^{2}+1}}-x^{2}+1}}{\biggr ]};2{\sqrt[{4}]{2}}\sin {\bigl (}{\frac {\pi }{8}}{\bigr )}{\biggr \}}+{\frac {1}{4}}\sec {\bigl (}{\frac {\pi }{8}}{\bigr )}F{\biggl \{}\arcsin {\biggl [}{\frac {2\cos(\pi /8)\,x}{x^{2}+1}}{\biggr ]};\tan {\bigl (}{\frac {\pi }{8}}{\bigr )}{\biggr \}}}{\biggr \rangle }_{x=0}^{x=\infty }=} = 1 4 sec  ( π 8 ) F [ π ; 2 2 4 sin  ( π 8 ) ] = 1 2 sec  ( π 8 ) K ( 2 2 − 2 ) = 2 sin  ( π 8 ) K ( 2 − 1 ) {\displaystyle ={\frac {1}{4}}\sec {\bigl (}{\frac {\pi }{8}}{\bigr )}F{\bigl [}\pi ;2{\sqrt[{4}]{2}}\sin {\bigl (}{\frac {\pi }{8}}{\bigr )}{\bigr ]}={\frac {1}{2}}\sec {\bigl (}{\frac {\pi }{8}}{\bigr )}K({\sqrt {2{\sqrt {2}}-2}}{\bigr )}=2\sin {\bigl (}{\frac {\pi }{8}}{\bigr )}K({\sqrt {2}}-1)} This result follows from that equation chain:
K ( 2 − 1 ) = 1 8 2 4 ( 2 + 1 ) β ( 3 8 ) {\displaystyle {\color {ForestGreen}K({\sqrt {2}}-1)={\frac {1}{8}}{\sqrt[{4}]{2}}\,({\sqrt {2}}+1)\,\beta {\bigl (}{\frac {3}{8}}{\bigr )}}} 
Combination of the integral identities with the nome The elliptic nome function has these important values:
q ( 1 2 2 ) = exp  ( − π ) {\displaystyle q({\tfrac {1}{2}}{\sqrt {2}})=\exp(-\pi )} q [ 1 4 ( 6 − 2 ) ] = exp  ( − 3 π ) {\displaystyle q[{\tfrac {1}{4}}({\sqrt {6}}-{\sqrt {2}})]=\exp(-{\sqrt {3}}\,\pi )} q ( 2 − 1 ) = exp  ( − 2 π ) {\displaystyle q({\sqrt {2}}-1)=\exp(-{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi )} For the proof of the correctness of these nome values, see the article Nome (mathematics) !
On the basis of these integral identities and the above-mentioned Definition and identities to the theta functions  in the same section of this article, exemplary theta zero values shall be determined now:
θ 3 [ q ( k ) ] = 2 π − 1 K ( k ) {\displaystyle \theta _{3}[q(k)]={\sqrt {2\pi ^{-1}K(k)}}} 
θ 3 [ exp  ( − π ) ] = θ 3 [ q ( 1 2 2 ) ] = 2 π − 1 K ( 1 2 2 ) = 2 − 1 / 2 π − 1 / 2 β ( 1 4 ) 1 / 2 = 2 − 1 / 4 π 4 Γ ( 3 4 ) − 1 {\displaystyle \theta _{3}[\exp(-\pi )]=\theta _{3}[q({\tfrac {1}{2}}{\sqrt {2}})]={\sqrt {2\pi ^{-1}K({\tfrac {1}{2}}{\sqrt {2}})}}=2^{-1/2}\pi ^{-1/2}\beta ({\tfrac {1}{4}})^{1/2}=2^{-1/4}{\sqrt[{4}]{\pi }}\,{\Gamma {\bigl (}{\tfrac {3}{4}}{\bigr )}}^{-1}} θ 3 [ exp  ( − 3 π ) ] = θ 3 { q [ 1 4 ( 6 − 2 ) ] } = 2 π − 1 K [ 1 4 ( 6 − 2 ) ] = 2 − 1 / 6 3 − 1 / 8 π − 1 / 2 β ( 1 3 ) 1 / 2 {\displaystyle \theta _{3}[\exp(-{\sqrt {3}}\,\pi )]=\theta _{3}{\bigl \{}q{\bigl [}{\tfrac {1}{4}}({\sqrt {6}}-{\sqrt {2}}){\bigr ]}{\bigr \}}={\sqrt {2\pi ^{-1}K{\bigl [}{\tfrac {1}{4}}({\sqrt {6}}-{\sqrt {2}}){\bigr ]}}}=2^{-1/6}3^{-1/8}\pi ^{-1/2}\beta ({\tfrac {1}{3}})^{1/2}} θ 3 [ exp  ( − 2 π ) ] = θ 3 [ q ( 2 − 1 ) ] = 2 π − 1 K ( 2 − 1 ) = 2 − 1 / 8 cos  ( 1 8 π ) π − 1 / 2 β ( 3 8 ) 1 / 2 {\displaystyle \theta _{3}[\exp(-{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi )]=\theta _{3}[q({\sqrt {2}}-1)]={\sqrt {2\pi ^{-1}K({\sqrt {2}}-1)}}=2^{-1/8}\cos({\tfrac {1}{8}}\pi )\,\pi ^{-1/2}\beta ({\tfrac {3}{8}})^{1/2}} θ 4 [ q ( k ) ] = 1 − k 2 4 2 π − 1 K ( k ) {\displaystyle \theta _{4}[q(k)]={\sqrt[{4}]{1-k^{2}}}\,{\sqrt {2\pi ^{-1}K(k)}}} 
θ 4 [ exp  ( − 2 π ) ] = θ 4 [ q ( 2 − 1 ) ] = 2 2 − 2 4 2 π − 1 K ( 2 − 1 ) = 2 − 1 / 4 cos  ( 1 8 π ) 1 / 2 π − 1 / 2 β ( 3 8 ) 1 / 2 {\displaystyle \theta _{4}[\exp(-{\sqrt {2}}\,\pi )]=\theta _{4}[q({\sqrt {2}}-1)]={\sqrt[{4}]{2{\sqrt {2}}-2}}\,{\sqrt {2\pi ^{-1}K({\sqrt {2}}-1)}}=2^{-1/4}\cos({\tfrac {1}{8}}\pi )^{1/2}\,\pi ^{-1/2}\beta ({\tfrac {3}{8}})^{1/2}} Partition sequences and Pochhammer products Regular partition number sequence The regular partition sequence P ( n ) {\displaystyle P(n)} integer number  n {\displaystyle n} n = 1 {\displaystyle n=1} n = 5 {\displaystyle n=5} P {\displaystyle P} 
Example values of P(n) and associated number partitions n P(n) paying partitions 0 1 () empty partition/empty sum   1 1 (1) 2 2 (1+1), (2) 3 3 (1+1+1), (1+2), (3) 4 5 (1+1+1+1), (1+1+2), (2+2), (1+3), (4) 5 7 (1+1+1+1+1), (1+1+1+2), (1+2+2), (1+1+3), (2+3), (1+4), (5) 
The generating function of the regular partition number sequence can be represented via Pochhammer product in the following way:
∑ k = 0 ∞ P ( k ) x k = 1 ( x ; x ) ∞ = θ 3 ( x ) − 1 / 6 θ 4 ( x ) − 2 / 3 [ θ 3 ( x ) 4 − θ 4 ( x ) 4 16 x ] − 1 / 24 {\displaystyle \sum _{k=0}^{\infty }P(k)x^{k}={\frac {1}{(x;x)_{\infty }}}=\theta _{3}(x)^{-1/6}\theta _{4}(x)^{-2/3}{\biggl [}{\frac {\theta _{3}(x)^{4}-\theta _{4}(x)^{4}}{16\,x}}{\biggr ]}^{-1/24}} The summandization of the now mentioned Pochhammer product  is described by the Pentagonal number theorem  in this way:
( x ; x ) ∞ = 1 + ∑ n = 1 ∞ [ − x Fn ( 2 n − 1 ) − x Kr ( 2 n − 1 ) + x Fn ( 2 n ) + x Kr ( 2 n ) ] {\displaystyle (x;x)_{\infty }=1+\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }{\bigl [}-x^{{\text{Fn}}(2n-1)}-x^{{\text{Kr}}(2n-1)}+x^{{\text{Fn}}(2n)}+x^{{\text{Kr}}(2n)}{\bigr ]}} The following basic definitions apply to the pentagonal numbers  and the card house numbers:
Fn ( z ) = 1 2 z ( 3 z − 1 ) {\displaystyle {\text{Fn}}(z)={\tfrac {1}{2}}z(3z-1)} Kr ( z ) = 1 2 z ( 3 z + 1 ) {\displaystyle {\text{Kr}}(z)={\tfrac {1}{2}}z(3z+1)} As a further application [ 17]   one obtains a formula for the third power of the Euler product:
( x ; x ) 3 = ∏ n = 1 ∞ ( 1 − x n ) 3 = ∑ m = 0 ∞ ( − 1 ) m ( 2 m + 1 ) x m ( m + 1 ) / 2 {\displaystyle (x;x)^{3}=\prod _{n=1}^{\infty }(1-x^{n})^{3}=\sum _{m=0}^{\infty }(-1)^{m}(2m+1)x^{m(m+1)/2}} Strict partition number sequence And the strict partition sequence Q ( n ) {\displaystyle Q(n)} n {\displaystyle n}  [ 18]   and no summand value occurs repeatedly. Exactly the same sequence [ 19]   is also generated if in the partition only odd summands are included, but these odd summands may occur more than once. Both representations for the strict partition number sequence are compared in the following table:
Example values of Q(n) and associated number partitions n Q(n) Number partitions without repeated summands Number partitions with only odd addends 0 1 () empty partition/empty sum   () empty partition/empty sum   1 1 (1) (1) 2 1 (2) (1+1) 3 2 (1+2), (3) (1+1+1), (3) 4 2 (1+3), (4) (1+1+1+1), (1+3) 5 3 (2+3), (1+4), (5) (1+1+1+1+1), (1+1+3), (5) 6 4 (1+2+3), (2+4), (1+5), (6) (1+1+1+1+1+1), (1+1+1+3), (3+3), (1+5) 7 5 (1+2+4), (3+4), (2+5), (1+6), (7) (1+1+1+1+1+1+1), (1+1+1+1+3), (1+3+3), (1+1+5), (7) 8 6 (1+3+4), (1+2+5), (3+5), (2+6), (1+7), (8) (1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1), (1+1+1+1+1+3), (1+1+3+3), (1+1+1+ 5), (3+5), (1+7) 
The generating function of the strict partition number sequence can be represented using Pochhammer's product:
∑ k = 0 ∞ Q ( k ) x k = 1 ( x ; x 2 ) ∞ = θ 3 ( x ) 1 / 6 θ 4 ( x ) − 1 / 3 [ θ 3 ( x ) 4 − θ 4 ( x ) 4 16 x ] 1 / 24 {\displaystyle \sum _{k=0}^{\infty }Q(k)x^{k}={\frac {1}{(x;x^{2})_{\infty }}}=\theta _{3}(x)^{1/6}\theta _{4}(x)^{-1/3}{\biggl [}{\frac {\theta _{3}(x)^{4}-\theta _{4}(x)^{4}}{16\,x}}{\biggr ]}^{1/24}} Overpartition number sequence The Maclaurin series  for the reciprocal of the function ϑ01  over partition sequence  as coefficients with a positive sign: [ 20]  
1 θ 4 ( x ) = ∏ n = 1 ∞ 1 + x n 1 − x n = ∑ k = 0 ∞ P ¯ ( k ) x k {\displaystyle {\frac {1}{\theta _{4}(x)}}=\prod _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {1+x^{n}}{1-x^{n}}}=\sum _{k=0}^{\infty }{\overline {P}}(k)x^{k}} 1 θ 4 ( x ) = 1 + 2 x + 4 x 2 + 8 x 3 + 14 x 4 + 24 x 5 + 40 x 6 + 64 x 7 + 100 x 8 + 154 x 9 + 232 x 10 + … {\displaystyle {\frac {1}{\theta _{4}(x)}}=1+2x+4x^{2}+8x^{3}+14x^{4}+24x^{5}+40x^{6}+64x^{7}+100x^{8}+154x^{9}+232x^{10}+\dots } If, for a given number k {\displaystyle k}  [ 21]   of the marked partitions depending on k {\displaystyle k} P ¯ ( k ) {\displaystyle {\overline {P}}(k)} 
First example:
P ¯ ( 4 ) = 14 {\displaystyle {\overline {P}}(4)=14} These 14 possibilities of partition markings exist for the sum 4:
(4), (4 ), (3+1), (3 +1), (3+1 ), (3 +1 ), (2+2), (2 +2), (2+1+1), (2 +1+1), (2+1 +1), (2 +1 +1), (1+1+1+1), (1 +1+1+1) 
Second example:
P ¯ ( 5 ) = 24 {\displaystyle {\overline {P}}(5)=24} These 24 possibilities of partition markings exist for the sum 5:
(5), (5 ), (4+1), (4 +1), (4+1 ), (4 +1 ), (3+2), (3 +2), (3+2 ), (3 +2 ), (3+1+1), (3 +1+1), (3+1 +1), (3 +1 +1), (2+2+1), (2 +2+1), (2+2+1 ), (2 +2+1 ), (2+1+1+1), (2 +1+1+1), (2+1 +1+1), (2 +1 +1+1), (1+1+1+1+1), (1 +1+1+1+1)
 
Notes  ↑   See e.g. https://dlmf.nist.gov/20.1 . Note that this is, in general, not equivalent to the usual interpretation ( e z ) α = e α Log  e z {\displaystyle (e^{z})^{\alpha }=e^{\alpha \operatorname {Log} e^{z}}} z {\displaystyle z} − π < Im  z ≤ π {\displaystyle -\pi <\operatorname {Im} z\leq \pi } Log {\displaystyle \operatorname {Log} } complex logarithm .  ↑   θ 1 ( q ) = 0 {\displaystyle \theta _{1}(q)=0} q ∈ C {\displaystyle q\in \mathbb {C} } | q | < 1 {\displaystyle |q|<1} References  ↑   Tyurin, Andrey N. (30 October 2002). "Quantization, Classical and Quantum Field Theory and Theta-Functions". arXiv : math/0210466v1   .  ↑   Chang, Der-Chen (2011). Heat Kernels for Elliptic and Sub-elliptic Operators . Birkhäuser. p.  7.  ↑    Tata Lectures on Theta I   4. doi :10.1007/978-0-8176-4577-9 . ISBN     978-0-8176-4572-4   ↑   Yi, Jinhee (2004). "Theta-function identities and the explicit formulas for theta-function and their applications" . Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications . 292  (2): 381– 400. doi : 10.1016/j.jmaa.2003.12.009   .  ↑   Berndt, Bruce C; Rebák, Örs (9 January 2022). "Explicit Values for Ramanujan's Theta Function ϕ(q)" . Hardy-Ramanujan Journal . 44  8923. arXiv : 2112.11882   . doi : 10.46298/hrj.2022.8923   . S2CID     245851672 .  ↑   Yi, Jinhee (15 April 2004). "Theta-function identities and the explicit formulas for theta-function and their applications" . Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications . 292  (2): 381– 400. doi : 10.1016/j.jmaa.2003.12.009   .  ↑   Andreas Dieckmann:  Table of Infinite Products Infinite Sums Infinite Series, Elliptic Theta.    Physikalisches Institut Universität Bonn, Abruf am 1. Oktober 2021.  ↑   Landau (1899) zitiert nach Borwein , Page 94, Exercise 3.  ↑    "Number-theoretical, combinatorial and integer functions – mpmath 1.1.0 documentation"  . Retrieved 2021-07-18  .  ↑   Mező, István (2013), "Duplication formulae involving Jacobi theta functions and Gosper's q -trigonometric functions",  Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society   , 141  (7): 2401– 2410, doi : 10.1090/s0002-9939-2013-11576-5     ↑   Mező, István (2012). "A q -Raabe formula and an integral of the fourth Jacobi theta function" . Journal of Number Theory . 133  (2): 692– 704. doi : 10.1016/j.jnt.2012.08.025   . hdl : 2437/166217   .  ↑    Weisstein, Eric W.  "Elliptic Alpha Function" .  MathWorld   .  ↑    "integration - Curious integrals for Jacobi Theta Functions $\int_0^1 \vartheta_n(0,q)dq$" . 2022-08-13.  ↑   Ohyama, Yousuke (1995). "Differential relations of theta functions" . Osaka Journal of Mathematics . 32  (2): 431– 450. ISSN     0030-6126 .  ↑   Shimura, On modular forms of half integral weight  ↑    "Elliptic Integral Singular Value" . msu.edu . Retrieved 2023-04-07  .  ↑    Ramanujan's theta-function identities involving Lambert series    ↑    "code golf - Strict partitions of a positive integer"  . Retrieved 2022-03-09  .  ↑    "A000009 - OEIS" . 2022-03-09.  ↑   Mahlburg, Karl (2004). "The overpartition function modulo small powers of 2". Discrete Mathematics . 286  (3): 263– 267. doi :10.1016/j.disc.2004.03.014 .  ↑   Kim, Byungchan (28 April 2009). "Elsevier Enhanced Reader" . Discrete Mathematics . 309  (8): 2528– 2532. doi : 10.1016/j.disc.2008.05.007   .  ↑   Eric W. Weisstein (2022-03-11). "Partition Function P" .  ↑   Eric W. Weisstein (2022-03-11). "Partition Function Q" .  Abramowitz, Milton ; Stegun, Irene A.  (1964). Handbook of Mathematical Functions Dover Publications . sec. 16.27ff.  ISBN     978-0-486-61272-0   Akhiezer, Naum Illyich  (1990) [1970]. Elements of the Theory of Elliptic Functions . AMS  Translations of Mathematical Monographs. Vol.  79. Providence, RI: AMS . ISBN     978-0-8218-4532-5   Farkas, Hershel M. ; Kra, Irwin  (1980). Riemann Surfaces . New York: Springer-Verlag . ch. 6. ISBN     978-0-387-90465-8  (for treatment of the Riemann theta)  Hardy, G. H. ; Wright, E. M.  (1959). An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers  (4th  ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press .  Mumford, David  (1983). Tata Lectures on Theta I . Boston: Birkhauser . ISBN     978-3-7643-3109-2   Pierpont, James  (1959). Functions of a Complex Variable . New York: Dover Publications .  Rauch, Harry E. ; Farkas, Hershel M. (1974). Theta Functions with Applications to Riemann Surfaces . Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins . ISBN     978-0-683-07196-2  Reinhardt, William P.; Walker, Peter L. (2010), "Theta Functions" , in Olver, Frank W. J. ; Lozier, Daniel M.; Boisvert, Ronald F.; Clark, Charles W. (eds.),  NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions   , Cambridge University Press, ISBN     978-0-521-19225-5 MR     2723248   .  Whittaker, E. T. ; Watson, G. N.  (1927). A Course in Modern Analysis  (4th  ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press . ch. 21. (history of Jacobi's θ  functions) Further reading Harry Rauch with Hershel M. Farkas: Theta functions with applications to Riemann Surfaces, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore MD 1974, ISBN     0-683-07196-3 
Charles Hermite: Sur la résolution de l'Équation du cinquiéme degré Comptes rendus, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Nr. 11, March 1858. This page is based on this 
Wikipedia article  Text is available under the 
CC BY-SA 4.0  license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.