Typhoon Gilda (1974)

Last updated
Typhoon Gilda (Deling)
Category 2 typhoon (SSHWS)
GildaJuly419740045UTC.gif
Typhoon Gilda on July 4
FormedJune 29, 1974
DissipatedJuly 17, 1974
(Extratropical after July 9)
Highest winds 1-minute sustained: 165 km/h (105 mph)
Lowest pressure945 hPa (mbar); 27.91 inHg
Fatalities145 total, 1 missing
Damage $1.5 billion (1974 USD)
Areas affected Northern Mariana Islands, Nansei Islands, South Korea, Kuril Islands, Sakhalin, Soviet Far East
Part of the 1974 Pacific typhoon season

Typhoon Gilda, known in the Philippines as Typhoon Deling was a destructive, deadly, costly and long-lived tropical cyclone that left over 145 confirmed deaths over Japan and South Korea, mostly due to torrential rainfall that induced landslides, all generated by the typhoon and its associated meiyu front. The eighth named storm and third typhoon of the 1974 Pacific typhoon season, the system was first noted by the China Meteorological Agency as an area of convection embedded on a trough, to the north of Enewetak Atoll on June 25. It was named Gilda on June 30 as it strengthened to a tropical storm. Under a favorable environment, it strengthened to a typhoon two days later as it moved northwestward. Another trough pulled Gilda poleward while changing less in intensity, until it intensified to a Category 2 typhoon as it battered the Ryukyu Islands at its peak. Increasing wind shear gradually weakened the system; however, it remained as a minimal typhoon until it passed through the southern tip of South Korea on July 6, where it weakened to a tropical storm. Colder waters in the Sea of Japan and high shear further degraded Gilda, until it transitioned to an extratropical low as it made landfall near Hokkaido on July 9. The remnants of the system briefly intensified near the Kuril Islands before weakening and dissipating on July 17 over the Sea of Okhotsk.

Contents

Gilda was responsible for over 145 fatalities and a missing person as it affected South Korea and the Japanese archipelago, including the Nansei Islands. Widespread flooding and landslides also occurred, which was more worsened by an active frontal system over Shanghai. The total damages from the system were at $1.5 billion (1974 USD).

Meteorological history

Map plotting the storm's track and intensity, according to the Saffir-Simpson scale

.mw-parser-output .hidden-begin{box-sizing:border-box;width:100%;padding:5px;border:none;font-size:95%}.mw-parser-output .hidden-title{font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;text-align:left}.mw-parser-output .hidden-content{text-align:left}
Map key
Saffir-Simpson scale
.mw-parser-output .div-col{margin-top:0.3em;column-width:30em}.mw-parser-output .div-col-small{font-size:90%}.mw-parser-output .div-col-rules{column-rule:1px solid #aaa}.mw-parser-output .div-col dl,.mw-parser-output .div-col ol,.mw-parser-output .div-col ul{margin-top:0}.mw-parser-output .div-col li,.mw-parser-output .div-col dd{page-break-inside:avoid;break-inside:avoid-column}.mw-parser-output .plainlist ol,.mw-parser-output .plainlist ul{line-height:inherit;list-style:none;margin:0}.mw-parser-output .plainlist ol li,.mw-parser-output .plainlist ul li{margin-bottom:0}
.mw-parser-output .legend{page-break-inside:avoid;break-inside:avoid-column}.mw-parser-output .legend-color{display:inline-block;min-width:1.25em;height:1.25em;line-height:1.25;margin:1px 0;text-align:center;border:1px solid black;background-color:transparent;color:black}.mw-parser-output .legend-text{}
Tropical depression (<=38 mph, <=62 km/h)

Tropical storm (39-73 mph, 63-118 km/h)

Category 1 (74-95 mph, 119-153 km/h)

Category 2 (96-110 mph, 154-177 km/h)

Category 3 (111-129 mph, 178-208 km/h)

Category 4 (130-156 mph, 209-251 km/h)

Category 5 (>=157 mph, >=252 km/h)

Unknown
Storm type
Tropical cyclone
Subtropical cyclone
Extratropical cyclone, remnant low, tropical disturbance, or monsoon depression Gilda 1974 track.png
Map plotting the storm's track and intensity, according to the Saffir–Simpson scale
Map key
  Tropical depression (≤38 mph, ≤62 km/h)
  Tropical storm (39–73 mph, 63–118 km/h)
  Category 1 (74–95 mph, 119–153 km/h)
  Category 2 (96–110 mph, 154–177 km/h)
  Category 3 (111–129 mph, 178–208 km/h)
  Category 4 (130–156 mph, 209–251 km/h)
  Category 5 (≥157 mph, ≥252 km/h)
  Unknown
Storm type
ArrowUp.svg Extratropical cyclone, remnant low, tropical disturbance, or monsoon depression

An area of convection on a surface trough which extended until Midway Atoll was first monitored by the China Meteorological Agency on June 25, approximately 400 km to the north of Enewetak Atoll. [1] [2] The Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) also started to monitor the system at this time, analysing it with a pressure of 1006 mBar in their first bulletin. The disturbance moved to the west without further development, based on satellite imagery. [1] On June 29, the system became better defined on satellite coverages, with the Joint Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC) issuing their first bulletin on the system at 00:00 UTC that day. [3] Based on a ship that reported gale-force winds near its center, the JTWC upgraded the system to a tropical storm at this time, with the agency naming it Gilda. [3] The JMA, at that time, analysed the barometric pressure of the system to be 990 mBar. [2] Gilda then began to curve northwards, as a mid-atmospheric trough began to be dominant over East China. [3] At 06:00 UTC of July 2, the system intensified to a typhoon, with its barometric pressure analyzed by the JMA to be 965 mBar. [2] [3] Early the next day, a Japanese vessel named Shinkyoyu Maru passed near the typhoon, recording a pressure of 988 mBar and winds of over 45 knots. [3] Gilda slowly intensified despite a favorable environment and while passing through the Ryukyu Islands, it strengthened to a Category 2 typhoon on July 4 and reached its peak intensity shortly, with one-minute sustained winds of 165 km/h (105 mph) and a barometric pressure of 945 mBar, equivalent to a mid-level typhoon. [2] [3] On the same day, a reconnaissance aircraft passed through its eye, measuring a minimum pressure of 944 mBar. [3] Shortly after peaking, the typhoon slowly weakened to a Category 1 due to increasing wind shear and unfavorable sea surface temperatures on the next day. [3] A mid-atmospheric subtropical ridge curved the system to the north-northeast and while nearing South Korea, Gilda weakened to a tropical storm and accelerated, due to an upper-level southwesterly flow over Manchuria. [3] [2] As it entered the Sea of Japan, the disorganized Gilda started to become extratropical while weakening to a tropical depression on July 7. [3] [2] In post-tropical analysis, Gilda remained a tropical depression as it made landfall through Hokkaido on the next day before becoming fully extratropical as it moved offshore in the Pacific Ocean on July 9. [2] [3] [4] The extratropical remnants of Gilda briefly strengthened while nearing the Kuril Islands and it started to undergo a loop before entering the Sea of Okhotsk. [2] There, it weakened below gale-force and dissipated on July 17, ending its long journey. [2]

Impact

Records compiled by the Japan Meteorological Agency shows that Gilda killed 145 individuals throughout its journey and the images it caused were estimated at $1.02 billion (1974 USD). [4]

South Korea

As Gilda grazed the southern coast of South Korea, eight individuals were reported dead by the authorities and another six persons are reported missing due to unknown reasons. [5] [6] [7] [8] There were reports of flooding and landslides throughout the southern portion of the country; however, the total damages and fatalities were unknown. [5]

Japan

Villages were buried in mud due to a landslide in Shodoshima Island. Damages from Gilda.png
Villages were buried in mud due to a landslide in Shōdoshima Island.

Gilda, despite affecting the country as a weak system, caused a catastrophic effect in its different prefectures and islands. Due to limited coverage about the whereabouts of the typhoon, the exact numbers of deaths were unknown, but it is estimated that Gilda killed 138 individuals in that country. In the history of Japan, the system was regarded as the eighth typhoon to cause large inundation damages. [4] The impacts of the storm were separated by prefectures as follows:

Kagawa Prefecture

On Shōdoshima Island in Kagawa Prefecture, it had been raining since July 4, but the baiu front brought torrential rains on July 6 and 7, triggering numerous landslides. [9] In Iwagaya, Uchinomi-cho and Shozu-gun, a maximum of 90 mm of rainfall in a day, 396 mm of daily rainfall, and a continuous rainfall of 406 mm were reported. [4] An unknown number were killed, 24 people were seriously injured, 216 homes were partially destroyed, and 47 houses were completely destroyed, as per reports. [10] Furthermore, several homes in the Tosan region were flooded, resulting in the greatest flood damage in the history of the prefecture. [4]

Okayama Prefecture

In the prefecture, reports defines that a house was washed away and 530 more were flooded, all in Bizen City. [11]

Hyogo Prefecture

Similar to Kagawa Prefecture, it has been raining on Awaji Island in Hyogo Prefecture since July 4, and a heavy rain warning was issued at 9:40 pm, two days later. [12] Rainfall began around 9 a.m. the next day in Ako City and heavy rain started to pour two hours later, with a maximum hourly rainfall of 56 mm, a daily rainfall of 312 mm, and a continuous rainfall of 313 mm. [12] As a result of the heavy rain, all rivers in the city were flooded and collapsed, causing flooding throughout the city. [12]

The rainfall amounts of 190 mm and daily rainfalls of 300 mm were recorded by the Tsuna district and Ichinomiya-cho of Awaji Island. [4] The torrential rain on the island caused flash floods and landslides, killing 14 people and injuring 13 others. [13] Furthermore, in southwest Kakogawa and Himeji, there were over 1,322 units flooded due to the typhoon. [14]

Wakayama Prefecture

In the city of Tanabe, 100 mm of precipitation and 442 mm total rainfall were recorded from 5:00 am to 6:00 am on July 7, causing damages to eight houses. [15]

Mie Prefecture

It had been raining in Mie Prefecture since June 29, but it began to pour heavily on July 6 as the typhoon approached. [4] The rainfall on that day and 7th were 300-500mm in the southern part of the prefecture, 150-280mm in the north-central part, and 850mm or more in the Odaigayama system, which is known for its heavy rainfall. [16] The warning water level was exceeded at 16:00 on that day in the lower reaches of Miyagawa, which receives its water from the Odaigayama system. [16] The villages of Misono and Watarai were threatened by an embankment collapse; however, some residents of Tako helped to avoid it by placing over 500 sandbags in the embankment. [17]

From around 13:00 on the 7th, heavy rain flooded the Seta River, which flowed through Ise City. [17] Over 3,051 hectares of households were flooded in the majority and in Misono Village of the city, over 2 people died, a house was destroyed and over 3,000 of them were flooded. [18] These floods were all due to the Tokitagawa basin that overflowed due to heavy rains. [18]

The Seta River was designated as a first-class river as the Miyagawa river system in 1975 (Showa 50) in order to be maintained by the national budget. [17] It widened the middle basin and in 1978, the Seta River tide gate became equipped with a drainage pump station to control the overflowing of the river. [17]

Aichi Prefecture

In the prefecture, Chita Peninsula and the eastern portion of Mikawa caused some widespread inundation damages due to the Yadagawa and Toyo River, which overflowed that day. [19] In the western half of the Owari Province, 4 fatalities were reported and over 9,267 households affected by flooding. [19] Eight railway lines also suffered damages. [19] Another river overflowed, submerging over 2,196 houses and 5,900 buildings and establishments. [20] The Mito River's left embankment was destroyed by strong currents, flooding wards, and establishments near the area. [21]

In Toyohashi, the rainfall amount recorded in the area was estimated to be 3,025mm, in total. The city recorded a fatality, destroyed two houses, and leftover 5,000 households flooded. [22]

Shizuoka Prefecture

In the prefecture, the rains started to impact the area on June 27, and rainfall of 100 mm was recorded from July 4–5. [4] In the western part, the rains started to pour in the early morning of July 7, and began stronger at that time. [4] In Araimachi (now merged into Kosai City), there were reports of house and embankment damages. [23] In the towns of Hosoe-cho and Inasa-gun (now Kita-ku City), still in the prefecture, the authorities recorded a fatality, five injuries, 57 affected households, and 681 flooded wards. [24] In Tenryū City (now Tenryū Ward) in Hamamatsu reported two fatalities, six injuries, 22 houses affected, and nearly 3,000 households were flooded. [25] The city, as a whole, recorded five deaths, two injuries, 32 affected houses, and exactly 1,500 households flooded. [26]

In Iwata, its river that flows through the Tenryu River system recorded a rainfall amount of 270 mm, which flooded 647 households, [27] and in Otagawa River basin, a levee was smashed by strong current from the river, causing flash floods that destroyed 87 houses and another 2,240 to be flooded. [28] The local authorities also reported flooding in Mori-cho and Shuchi-gun, which caused a fatality, five serious injuries and over 723 households to be submerged. [29] In Fujieda City, three houses were destroyed, 4 were partially washed out, and another 1,424 to be flooded. [30] Yaizu City reported 2,045 households flooded and/or washed out; however, there were no fatalities. [31]

In its city, the authorities at a meteorological center recorded a rainfall amount of 508 mm, an unusually high amount in its record. [32] In addition, the Abe River overflowed, destroying 39 houses in its path and flooding 8,171 more. [33] The Tomoegawa river also overflowed, killing 23 people and injured 28 more. [34] Over 22,551 households were also flooded as a result. [35] The town of Shimizu reported four deaths, three destroyed houses, and over 50,283 flooded households. [36] In Fuji City, the authorities there reported a fatality and over 3,464 houses were flooded. [37] The Kano River in Numazu broke its embankment, submerging over 681 households that killed a person. [38] A rainfall accumulation of 73 mm were reported in a week in the city of Mishima, destroying eight houses and flooded 1,416 more. [39]

Regarding transportations, some major highways and expressways like Japan National Route 1 and Tōmei Expressway, and railway lines such as the Tōkaidō Main Line, Tokaido Shinkansen were disrupted due to major floodings and sometimes, landslides that made motorist stranded. [40] The Yui Station, a railway station recorded 376 mm of rainfall amount. [41] The Tokaido Main Line by the Central Japan Railway Company suffered major damage, halting railway operations in that place for a week. [41]

Kanagawa Prefecture

The Sagami River in Kanagawa Prefecture flooded over 272 houses in Hiratsuka. [42] Yokosuka, a naval base, recorded a rainfall amount of more than 250 mm in eight days. [43] In all parts of the city, multiple portions of cliffs broke and fell down the road and streets, killing 13 in a family and another 4 to be feared dead, as they were trapped in a house. [43] The second-largest city of the prefecture, Yokohama, recorded a rainfall accumulation of 43 mm. This was enough for the Tsurumi River to overflow, submerging over 1,110 in floodwaters. [44]

Tokyo Metropolis

The Tsurumi River overflowed, first submerging homes in Kanagawa Prefecture before reaching Tokyo, flooding an unknown number of houses. [45] In addition, the Meguro River and Tama River also reached over their limit capacity, flooding over 859 households in different towns and wards. [45] It was unknown if there were deaths and further damages attributed to the system. [45]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ōkuma, Fukushima</span> Town in Tōhoku, Japan

Ōkuma is a town located in Fukushima Prefecture, Japan. In 2010, the town had a population of 11,515. However, the town was totally evacuated in the aftermath of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster and residents were permitted return during daylight hours from May 2013. In April 2019, parts of the town were deemed to have been successfully decontaminated, with residents allowed to return to these areas.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aoi-ku, Shizuoka</span> Ward in Tōkai Koshinetsu region, Japan

Aoi-ku is one of three wards of the city of Shizuoka in Shizuoka Prefecture, Japan, located in the northern part of the city. Aoi-ku borders Suruga-ku in the south and Shimizu-ku to the southeast; the west faces Shimada, Fujieda and Kawanehon and its northern tip extends into the border between Nagano Prefecture and Yamanashi Prefecture. It is the largest ward in Japan in terms of geographic area.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1953 Northern Kyushu flood</span>

The 1953 North Kyushu flood was a flood which hit Northern Kyushu, Japan in June 1953. The flood was caused by cloudbursts and prolonged rain from the Meiyu rain front which dropped 1,000 mm of rain over Mount Aso and Mount Hiko. This downpour resulted in the overflow of many of the surrounding rivers, such as the Chikugo River.

The 1930 North Izu earthquake occurred on November 26 at 04:02 local time. The epicenter was located in the northern Izu Peninsula, Japan. It had a magnitude of Ms 7.3, and was caused by the movement of the Tanna Fault (丹那断層).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2014 Hiroshima landslides</span> Natural disaster in Japan

On 20 August 2014, Hiroshima Prefecture in Japan was struck by a series of landslides following heavy rain. The rain triggered 166 slope failures which included 107 debris flows and 59 shallow slides. The landslides hit residential areas including Kabe, Asakita Ward, Yagi, Yamamoto, Midorii, and Asaminami Ward. Of these areas, the Asakita and Asaminami Wards in Northern Hiroshima were hit the hardest.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kuji River</span> River in Honshu, Japan

Kuji River is a river in Fukushima Prefecture, Tochigi Prefecture and Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan. It rises at the northern slope of Mount Yamizo, where the border of these three prefectures is located, and flows into Pacific Ocean at Hitachi and Tokai in Ibaraki Prefecture. It has a length of 124 kilometers (77 mi) and a drainage area of 1,490 square kilometers (580 sq mi), and is designated as a Class A river.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Typhoon Francisco (2019)</span> Pacific typhoon in 2019

Typhoon Francisco was a small tropical cyclone that impacted Japan and the Korean Peninsula in August 2019. Originating from a trough over the open Pacific Ocean on July 29, Francisco developed into a tropical depression on August 1. Tracking along a northwest course toward Japan, the system steadily intensified over the following days. It attained typhoon strength on August 5 and soon struck Kyushu at peak strength with winds of 130 km/h (80 mph). Thereafter, the weakened storm traversed the Korea Strait before striking South Korea on August 6. Turning toward the east, Francisco transitioned into an extratropical cyclone on August 7. It later impacted Hokkaido before continuing across the northern Pacific and dissipating.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Typhoon Georgia (1959)</span> Pacific typhoon in 1959

Typhoon Georgia was one of the more impactful typhoons that struck Japan, as well as one of the few observed tropical cyclones that made direct landfall in Russia as a tropical storm. A low pressure system formed in the vicinity of Guam on August 10 which formed Tropical Depression Fran, and a new low-level center formed from a fracture of a trough that split newly formed tropical depression in the midnight of August 12. The newly formed low level center was classified as a tropical storm and was named Georgia hours later by the Joint Typhoon Warning Center. The new tropical storm was tracked by Japan Meteorological Agency shortly afterwards and Georgia rapidly intensified into a typhoon. On the next day, Georgia further intensified after passing Chichi Jima and reached peak sustained winds of 110 knots (57 m/s) while quickly accelerating in the north-northwest direction before striking Chūbu region in Japan on evening of the same day as a weakening typhoon. After emerging on the Sea of Japan as a tropical storm on August 14, Georgia made landfall in Soviet Union as a tropical storm at the afternoon of the same day, before transforming into an extratropical storm quickly after landfall. Remnants of Georgia was last noted on Heilongjiang, China on August 16.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shinise</span> Long-established businesses in Japan

In Japan, shinise are long-established businesses that have been in operation for a long time, at least for a hundred years. Some are older than a thousand years. Japan has significantly more very old businesses than other countries, and they and their products enjoy a particular prestige in Japan.

The 2015 Ogasawara earthquake was a 7.8 magnitude earthquake which struck offshore Japan 189 km (117 mi) west northwest of Chichi-jima in the Ogasawara Islands on May 30 at a depth of 664.0 km (412.6 mi). The shaking of the earthquake was observed almost all over Japan, as it was one of the largest deep-focus earthquakes recorded worldwide.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Typhoon Talim (2017)</span> Western Pacific typhoon in 2017

Typhoon Talim, known in the Philippines as Typhoon Lannie, was an intense and destructive tropical cyclone that affected parts of East Asia, especially Japan, during September 2017. The eighteenth named storm and the sixth typhoon of the 2017 Pacific typhoon season, Talim's origins can be traced back to an area of low-pressure that the Joint Typhoon Warning Center first monitored on September 6. The disturbance was upgraded to a tropical depression by the Japan Meteorological Agency only two days later, and it became a tropical storm on September 9, earning the name Talim. Talim grew stronger over the next few days, eventually becoming a typhoon the next day. Within a favorable environment, the typhoon rapidly intensified after passing through the Ryukyu Islands. However, as it moved eastward, Talim started to weaken due to wind shear, and on September 16, it was downgraded to a tropical storm. The storm passed over Japan, near Kyushu the next day, before becoming extratropical on September 18. The extratropical remnants were last noted by the JMA four days later, before dissipating fully on September 22.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1925 North Tajima earthquake</span> Earthquake struck Hyogo Prefecture, Japan on May 23, 1925

The 1925 North Tajima earthquake occurred on May 23, 1925 at Toyooka, Hyōgo in Japan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2011 Nagano earthquake</span> Earthquake in Japan

The 2011 Nagano earthquake was an earthquake that occurred near the border between Niigata and Nagano prefectures at 3:59 JST on March 12, 2011. The depth of the hypocenter was 8 km and magnitude of the earthquake was MJMA 6.7.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1982 Nagasaki flood</span>

The 1982 Nagasaki flood was caused by a cloudburst that occurred mainly in Nagasaki, Japan in July 1982.

The 1896 Rikuu earthquake is an inland earthquake that occurred on August 31, 1896, near the border between Akita and Iwate prefectures, Japan. Magnitude was 7.2. The earthquake left 209 people dead and 779 people injured. Senya Fault is a fault which was responsible for 1896 Rikuu earthquake, along with surface rupture.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2011 Shizuoka earthquake</span> Earthquake in Japan

The 2011 Shizuoka earthquake occurred approximately 42 km (26 mi) north-northeast of Shizuoka City at 22:31 JST, 15 March 2011. The magnitude was Mw  6.0 or MJMA  6.4, and the depth was 9 km (5.6 mi). The hypocenter of this earthquake is thought to have been near the presumed location of the magma chamber of Mount Fuji. It may have been a triggered earthquake caused by the Tohoku earthquake, which occurred four days earlier, on 11 March 2011. It was sinistral strike-slip fault earthquake. It had a maximum JMA intensity of Shindo 6+ (Fujinomiya) or VIII (Severe) on the Mercalli intensity scale. The earthquake left 80 people injured, and caused some power outages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2022 Fukushima earthquake</span> 2022 earthquake near Fukushima, Japan

On March 16, 2022, at 23:36 JST, a strong earthquake struck off the coast of Fukushima, Japan. The earthquake had a magnitude of 7.4 according to the Japanese Meteorological Agency (JMA), while the United States Geological Survey (USGS) gave an estimate of 7.3. Immediately after the event a 30‑cm tsunami was reported. The event is known in Japanese as Fukushima-ken Oki Jishin. As a result of this natural disaster, three people died and 247 were injured.

The 1987 Chiba Prefecture offshore earthquake occurred off the east coast of the Boso Peninsula in Chiba Prefecture at 11:08:01 JST on December 17, 1987.

References

  1. 1 2 "METEOROLOGICAL RESULTS 1974" (PDF). Hong Kong Observatory . Retrieved April 4, 2021.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 "IBTrACS - International Best Track Archive for Climate Stewardship". ibtracs.unca.edu. Retrieved 2021-04-04.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 "Annual Tropical Cyclone Report of 1974" (PDF). Joint Typhoon Warning Center . Retrieved April 4, 2021.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 "前線、低気圧、台風第8号 昭和49年(1974年) 5月29日~8月1日". www.data.jma.go.jp. Retrieved 2021-04-04.
  5. 1 2 "Japan, Korea hit". Victoria Advocate. 1974-07-08. p. 1. Retrieved 2021-04-04.
  6. "Typhoon Gilda lashes Japan, leaves 33 dead". The Courier-Journal. 1974-07-08. p. 5. Retrieved 2021-04-04.
  7. "Gilda lashes Japan". Star-Gazette. 1974-07-08. p. 2. Retrieved 2021-04-04.
  8. "Typhoon Gilda kills at least 83 in Japan". Alberni Valley Times. 1974-07-08. p. 1. Retrieved 2021-04-04.
  9. "Typhoon Gilda ravages Japan". The Vancouver Sun. 1974-07-08. p. 3. Retrieved 2021-04-04.
  10. 『過去の土砂災害の概要』(香川県)
  11. 『備前市地域防災計画(風水害対策編)』(備前市防災会議)15ページ
  12. 1 2 3 『赤穂市地域防災計画』(赤穂市防災会議)21ページ
  13. 『地域災害の歴史』明石市消防本部)
  14. 『姫路の風土と地理的条件 | 姫路市の自然災害 | 防災情報 | ひめじ防災プラザ』(姫路市)
  15. 『田辺市地域防災計画 一般対策編』(田辺市)29ページ
  16. 1 2 『宮川水系の流域及び河川の概要 (案)』(国土交通省河川局、平成19年7月11日)47ページ
  17. 1 2 3 4 『宮川水系の流域及び河川の概要』 46ページ
  18. 1 2 『20号台風について(H2.10.10.)』(長岡敏彦)
    『今後の河川整備基本方針の策定について』(国土交通省)4ページ
  19. 1 2 3 『昭和49年7月の水害記録』(愛知県建設部河川課)
  20. 『2000年東海豪雨災害における都市型水害被害の特徴について』(佐藤照子、防災科学技術研究所)24ページ
  21. 『第24回 愛知県河川整備計画流域委員会 資料-2』(愛知県河川整備計画流域委員会)3-4ページ
  22. 『19年版 消防年報』(豊橋市消防本部)30ページ
  23. 『静岡県市町村災害史 新居町(静岡県地震防災センター)
  24. 『静岡県市町村災害史 細江町(静岡県地震防災センター)
  25. 『静岡県市町村災害史 天竜市』(静岡県地震防災センター)
  26. 『浜松市 -静岡県市町村災害史』(静岡県地震防災センター)
  27. 『一級河川天竜川水系一雲済川(天竜川下流中遠ブロック)河川整備計画』(静岡県建設部)9ページ
  28. 『太田川ダム建設に関する質問と回答』(静岡県土木課)
  29. 『静岡県市町村災害史 森町(静岡県地震防災センター)
  30. 『静岡県市町村災害史 藤枝市(静岡県地震防災センター)
  31. 『静岡県市町村災害史 焼津市』(静岡県地震防災センター)
  32. 『過去の災害 七夕洪水』(静岡土木事務所)
  33. 『安倍川水系河川整備基本方針』(国土交通省)6ページ
  34. 『安倍川水系河川整備基本方針』(国土交通省河川局、平成16年4月16日)3ページ
  35. 『静岡県市町村災害史 清水市』(静岡県地震防災センター)
  36. 『水害面からみた土地利用状況の問題点』(入澤実、1979年1月、防災科学技術研究所)16ページ表12、これの出典は『七夕災害による静岡・清水地区浸水家屋数』(流域総合洪水防御計画調査報告書、建設省土木研究所、1977年)
  37. 『静岡県市町村災害史 富士市』(静岡県地震防災センター)
  38. 『静岡県市町村災害史 沼津市』(静岡県地震防災センター)
  39. 『昭和49年7月7日 - 8日 七夕豪雨』(三島市)
  40. 地すべりフォーラム2007 in 由比(富士砂防事務所)
  41. 1 2 『中部地方 日本の地すべり』(国土交通省)
    『静岡県における水害・土砂災害等の現状の課題と当面の進め方について』(国土交通省・静岡県)5ページ
  42. 『第14回関東地方ダム等管理フォローアップ委員会」の開催結果について 』(国土交通省関東地方整備局)21ページ
  43. 1 2 『台風8号による豪雨で大きな被害を受ける』(横須賀市)
  44. 『第2章 河川整備の現状と課題』(国土交通京浜河川事務所)2ページ
  45. 1 2 3 『昭和49年7月7日(台風8号)の一般資産被害調書』(東京都建設局)