Vietnam Veteran Medal Throwing Protest

Last updated
Vietnam Veteran Throwing Medal at the U.S. Capital Vietnam Vet Throwing Medal at US Capital.jpg
Vietnam Veteran Throwing Medal at the U.S. Capital

On April 23, 1971 Vietnam Veterans Against the War staged what was arguably "one of the most dramatic and influential events of the antiwar movement" as hundreds of Vietnam veterans, dressed in combat fatigues and well worn uniforms, stepped up, and angrily, one after another for three straight hours, hurled their military medals, ribbons, discharge papers, and even a cane, onto the steps of the U.S. Capitol. Many of them paused to speak, expressing sentiments ranging from "I pray that time will forgive me and my brothers for what we did" to "I got a purple heart and I hope I get another one fighting these mother-fuckers." [1] :p.113

Contents

Veteran Throwing His Medals as Others Wait Their Turn. Photo by Fred W. McDarrah Vietnam Veterans Throw Their Medals Away April 23, 1971.jpg
Veteran Throwing His Medals as Others Wait Their Turn. Photo by Fred W. McDarrah

There has never been an antiwar or anti-government protest anything like this in the U.S. before or since. [2] The very soldiers who had been sent to fight were back homemany bearing the physical and mental wounds of war, some riding in wheelchairsat the doorsteps of the government which sent them, testifying to what they had witnessed and come to understand, saying the war was wrong; demanding it end. [1] :p.116 An editorial in the Akron Beacon Journal called the veterans "men of conscience" and said, of "all the demonstrations" against the war, "none has had greater impact". It continued, arguing that veteran testimony "must inevitably carry more weight than the protests or endorsements of those who have never seen this war firsthand." [2] A member of the Daughters of the American Revolution, a patriotic organization which was holding its annual convention in Washington that week, approached one of the protesting veterans and said, "'Son, I don't think what you're doing is good for the troops.'" The veteran replied: "'Lady, we are the troops.'" [3] :p.104 [4] :p.97

Operation Dewey Canyon III

Vietnam Veterans Protest the War During Operation Dewey Canyon III Operation Dewey Canyon III - Vietnam Veterans Against the War.jpg
Vietnam Veterans Protest the War During Operation Dewey Canyon III

The medal throwing was the culminating event of six days of protests which started on April 18 as the first of over two thousand veterans arrived in Washington, DC. The whole six days came to be called Operation Dewey Canyon III by the veteransa name intended to draw attention to two semi-secret U.S. and South Vietnamese military operations in Vietnam and Laos dubbed Dewey Canyon I & II. [5] :p.57 Using typical military jargon, the protesting vets termed Operation Dewey Canyon III, a "limited incursion into the country of Congress." [3] :pp.26&172 The early days were filled with marches of hundreds of veterans, often led by men in wheelchairs and on crutches, wearing "a wild assortment of campaign ribbons, purple hearts, camouflage half uniforms, and jungle camouflage hats"; guerrilla theater on Capital Hill, where vets staged mock search-and-destroy missions showing how U.S. troops were ordered to kill everything that moved and demonstrating that the Mỹ Lai massacre was not an aberration; and lobbying of members of congress. [6]

The lobbying efforts were an eye-opener for many veterans who hoped they would be listened to by the politicians. Instead they discovered many wouldn't even meet with them, saying things like "I know where you stand and you know where I stand. We're on opposite sides." One veteran was berated by his congressman who said, "You're a disgrace to the uniform! Get out of this office!" With few exceptions, the vets felt the politicians were unmoved and not about to change their positions. "The politicians sent us to Vietnam. Now they don't want to hear us," said one ex-Marine. Another vet concluded, it made us "more radical." [4] :pp.99–102

President Richard Nixon fed into this growing disillusionment and anger when he claimed that "only 30 percent of the people [protesting were] Vietnam veterans." The vets responded by collecting 1,200 DD-214s (military discharge papers) from the veterans in the camp and presenting them to the press. One veteran expressed all the protesters' sentiments when he said, "Only 30 percent of us believe Nixon is President." [7] [4] :p.102 One of the highlights for the vets was attending a Senate hearing room to hear Senator George McGovern "call for an immediate end" to the war. They cheered as he denounced the crimes "involved in killing several hundred thousand innocent civilians by our massive firepower." And again as he compared the "crimes against humanity" being committed by the U.S. in Vietnam to those committed by German and Japanese forces in World War II. [6]

Medal Throwing

Hundreds of Vietnam veterans hurled their war medals, ribbons, discharge papers, and even a cane onto the U.S. Capitol Steps 800 Vietnam Veterans Throw War Medals on Capitol Steps Into a Pile Marked Trash April 23, 1971.jpg
Hundreds of Vietnam veterans hurled their war medals, ribbons, discharge papers, and even a cane onto the U.S. Capitol Steps

The growing anger of the veterans helped them decide what to do on the last day of the demonstrations. As one vet explained, "I remember there was a big debate about whether we should throw the medals away at the Capitol Building or put them in a body bag." [4] :p.111 Some of the less radical vets felt it would be disrespectful to throw the medals away, but, as the debate continued, a fence was erected in front of the Capitol to keep the vets away. That was it, one of the vets shouted "Let's throw the medals over the goddammed fence." Another said, "We're making a statement that they can't ignore." [8] :p.249 The veterans were making a significant decision. As history professor Andrew E. Hunt put it, "In the military culture, citations, ribbons, and decorations assumed a significance that most civilians did not understand." Hunt quoted a vet explaining what his medals meant to him, "That was my thanks for Vietnam. That was my recognition. That was all the fuck I had for my sacrifices." Over time, however, the vet understood the medals were "tokens for something I wasn't proud of anymore." [4] :p.113 Another vet knew what they needed to do, "We were giving the finger to Congress." [4] :p.115

The first veteran to step forward was Jack Smith, a 27 year old ex-Marine sergeant from Connecticut. He said he was casting his medals "away as symbols of shame, dishonor, and inhumanity." [4] :p.113 One by one, the veterans stepped up in front of the Capitol and hurled their anger over the fence. Many announced their name and military unit, and some threw medals for other vets who couldn't be present, including one vet who tossed "nine Purple Hearts, a Distinguished Service Cross, a Bronze Star, a Silver Star 'and a lot of other shit...for my brothers.'" [4] :pp.113–4 One vet threw the artificial leg he had been issued by the military. [4] :p.114 Another tossed his Bronze Star saying, "I wish I could make them eat it!" [5] :p.72 Some were so overcome upon reaching the front of the line they couldn't speak or could only get out a few words like, "These ain't shit." Another yelled "Here are my merit badges for murder." A former Marine told the New York Times why he was throwing his medals away: he said he had been trained not to "trust the kids, don't trust the old women, they'll kill you." But, he went on, "It's the people's struggle against the aggressor, [and] we're the aggressor." [9] One veteran, seemingly speaking for many of the others, pointed to the Capitol building and said, "We don't want to fight anymore, but if we have to fight again, it'll be to take these steps." [4] :p.115

Impact

Anti-Vietnam War Demonstration in Washington, DC April 24, 1971 Washington DC, April 24, 1971, the day after Operation Dewey Canyon III.jpg
Anti-Vietnam War Demonstration in Washington, DC April 24, 1971

After the last veteran had thrown his medals, "fourteen Navy and Distinguished Service Crosses, one hundred Silver Stars, and more than a thousand Purple Hearts lay on the ground." [4] :p.115 Many of the veterans felt immense relief. It "was the defining moment of my life" recalled a vet from Kansas. Several vets embraced each other and wept. More, the larger antiwar movement was profoundly impacted and energized. Antiwar leader Sid Peck said the veterans' actions had "set the whole tone" for the demonstrations that followed. The very next day, Saturday April 24, 1971, one of the largest antiwar demonstrations in U.S. history took place as half a million marched in Washington, D.C. and a quarter million in San Francisco. [4] :pp.115–6 Even with these massive mobilizations, it was clear the veterans had struck a deeper chord. A Pennsylvania newspaper said the "appearance of 900 warriors for peace" will more "influence the thinking of the nation". During the days of actions, the nightly network news broadcasts often "began with footage of the veterans' protests." [4] :p.116 The Plain Dealer in Cleveland called the veterans' protests "deeply impressive." [10] The Philadelphia Daily News agreed saying the "opinions of those who have fought that war should carry special weight." [11] The New York Times called the medal throwing "the most emotional" of the demonstrations, the "highlight of the week", with "an impact far greater than its numbers." [9]

The demonstration was denounced by the Nixon White House and its supporters, such as Senate Minority Leader Hugh Scott and Commander Herbert B. Rainwater of the Veterans of Foreign Wars. [12] White House Chief of Staff H. R. Haldeman recorded the following in his diary after emerging from an April 23, 1971 meeting with President Nixon:

We got into quite a discussion of the media problem. They’re really killing us because they run the veterans demonstration every night in great detail, and we have no way to fight back. It's a tough one, and we've been trying to figure out some ways of getting back at it....we're getting pretty well chopped up. [13]

White House records indicate that the demonstrations so concerned Nixon and his advisors that they "began looking around for other Vietnam veterans who could counter" the antiwar message. They settled on John O'Neill who belonged to a small conservative group called Vietnam Veterans for a Just Peace. [14] With Nixon's encouragement, O’Neill held a press conference in June 1971 where he asked, should a "little group of one thousand or twelve thousand embittered men be allowed to represent their views as that of all veterans, because they can appear on every news program? I hope not, for the country’s sake." [15]

John Kerry participated in the protest, throwing his ribbons but not his medals. The incident resurfaced during the controversy over his military service that accompanied his 2004 presidential campaign. [16]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ron Kovic</span> American activist and writer (born 1946)

Ronald Lawrence Kovic is an American anti-war activist, author, and United States Marine Corps sergeant who was wounded and paralyzed in the Vietnam War. His best selling 1976 memoir Born on the Fourth of July was made into the film of the same name which starred actor Tom Cruise as Kovic, and was co-written by Kovic and directed by Oliver Stone.

<i>The Spitting Image</i> Book by Jerry Lembcke

The Spitting Image: Myth, Memory and the Legacy of Vietnam is a 1998 book by Vietnam veteran and sociology professor Jerry Lembcke. The book is an analysis of the widely believed narrative that American soldiers were spat upon and insulted by anti-war protesters upon returning home from the Vietnam War. The book examines the origin of the earliest stories; the popularization of the "spat-upon image" through Hollywood films and other media, and the role of print news media in perpetuating the now iconic image through which the history of the war and anti-war movement has come to be represented.

Scott Camil is an American political activist. He first gained prominence as an opponent of the Vietnam War, as a witness in the Winter Soldier Investigation and a member of Vietnam Veterans Against the War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Opposition to United States involvement in the Vietnam War</span> 1965–1973 anti-war movement

Opposition to United States involvement in the Vietnam War began in 1965 with demonstrations against the escalating role of the United States in the war. Over the next several years, these demonstrations grew into a social movement which was incorporated into the broader counterculture of the 1960s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Moratorium to End the War in Vietnam</span> 1969 nationwide activism against the US involvement in the Vietnam War

The Moratorium to End the War in Vietnam was a massive demonstration and teach-in across the United States against the United States involvement in the Vietnam War. It took place on October 15, 1969, followed a month later, on November 15, 1969, by a large Moratorium March in Washington, D.C.

The "Winter Soldier Investigation" was a media event sponsored by the Vietnam Veterans Against the War (VVAW) from January 31, 1971, to February 2, 1971. It was intended to publicize war crimes and atrocities by the United States Armed Forces and their allies in the Vietnam War. The VVAW challenged the morality and conduct of the war by showing the direct relationship between military policies and war crimes in Vietnam. The three-day gathering of 109 veterans and 16 civilians took place in Detroit, Michigan. Discharged servicemen from each branch of the armed forces, as well as civilian contractors, medical personnel and academics, all gave testimony about war crimes they had committed or witnessed during the years 1963–1970.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vietnam Veterans Against the War</span> American nonprofit organization

Vietnam Veterans Against the War (VVAW) is an American tax-exempt non-profit organization and corporation founded in 1967 to oppose the United States policy and participation in the Vietnam War. VVAW is a national veterans' organization that campaigns for peace, justice, and the rights of all United States military veterans. It publishes a twice-yearly newsletter, The Veteran; this was earlier published more frequently as 1st Casualty (1971–1972) and then as Winter Soldier (1973–1975).

<i>Sir! No Sir!</i> 2005 film about anti-Vietnam War soldiers and sailors

Sir! No Sir! is a 2005 documentary by Displaced Films about the anti-war movement within the ranks of the United States Armed Forces during the Vietnam War. The film was produced, directed, and written by David Zeiger. The film had a theatrical run in 80 cities throughout the U.S. and Canada in 2006, and was broadcast worldwide on Sundance Channel, Discovery Channel, BBC, ARTE France, ABC Australia, SBC Spain, ZDF Germany, YLE Finland, RT, and several others.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nationwide student anti-war strike of 1970</span> American anti-war protest

The nationwide student anti-war strike of 1970 was a massive outpouring of anti-Vietnam War protests that erupted in May of 1970 in response to the expansion of the war into neighboring Cambodia. The strike began on May 1 with walk-outs from college and high school classrooms on nearly 900 campuses across the United States. It increased dramatically following the shooting of students at Kent State University in Ohio by National Guardsmen on May 4. While a number violent incidents occurred during the protests, for the most part, they were peaceful.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fort Hood Three</span> Three U.S. Army soldiers who refused to deploy to Vietnam in 1966

The Fort Hood Three were three United States Army soldiers – Private First Class James Johnson, Private David A. Samas, and Private Dennis Mora – who refused to be deployed to fight in the Vietnam War on June 30, 1966. This was the first public refusal of orders to Vietnam, and one of the earliest acts of resistance to the war from within the U.S. military. Their refusal was widely publicized and became a cause célèbre within the growing antiwar movement. They filed a federal suit against Secretary of Defense Robert S. McNamara and Secretary of the Army Stanley Resor to prevent their shipment to Southeast Asia and were court-martialed by the Army for insubordination.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Concerned Officers Movement</span> Organization of U.S. military officers opposed to the Vietnam War

The Concerned Officers Movement (COM) was an organization of mainly junior officers formed within the U.S. military in the early 1970s. Though its principal purpose was opposition to the U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War, it also fought for First Amendment rights within the military. It was initiated in the Washington, D.C., area by commissioned officers who were also Vietnam Veterans, but rapidly expanded throughout all branches and many bases of the U.S. military, ultimately playing an influential role in the opposition to the Vietnam War. At least two of its chapters expanded their ranks to include enlisted personnel (non-officers), in San Diego changing the group's name to Concerned Military, and in Kodiak, Alaska, to Concerned Servicemen's Movement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stop Our Ship</span> Campaign of U.S. sailors and civilians against the Vietnam War

The Stop Our Ship (SOS) movement, a component of the overall civilian and GI movements against the Vietnam War, was directed towards and developed on board U.S. Navy ships, particularly aircraft carriers heading to Southeast Asia. It was concentrated on and around major U.S. Naval stations and ships on the West Coast from mid-1970 to the end of the Vietnam War in 1975, and at its height involved tens of thousands of antiwar civilians, military personnel and veterans. It was sparked by the tactical shift of U.S. combat operations in Southeast Asia from the ground to the air. As the ground war stalemated and Army grunts increasingly refused to fight or resisted the war in various other ways, the U.S. “turned increasingly to air bombardment”. By 1972 there were twice as many Seventh Fleet aircraft carriers in the Gulf of Tonkin as previously and the antiwar movement, which was at its height in the U.S. and worldwide, became a significant factor in the Navy. While no ships were actually prevented from returning to war, the campaigns, combined with the broad antiwar and rebellious sentiment of the times, stirred up substantial difficulties for the Navy, including active duty sailors refusing to sail with their ships, circulating petitions and antiwar propaganda on board, disobeying orders, and committing sabotage, as well as persistent civilian antiwar activity in support of dissident sailors. Several ship combat missions were postponed or altered and one ship was delayed by a combination of a civilian blockade and crewmen jumping overboard.

<i>Waging Peace in Vietnam</i> 2019 book edited by Ron Carver, David Cortright and Barbara Doherty

Waging Peace in Vietnam: U.S. Soldiers and Veterans Who Opposed the War is a non-fiction book edited by Ron Carver, David Cortright, and Barbara Doherty. It was published in September 2019 by New Village Press and is distributed by New York University Press. In March 2023 a Vietnamese language edition of the book was launched at the War Remnants Museum in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Richard Nixon's visit to the Lincoln Memorial</span> Spontaneous trip by US president to local monument

In the early hours of May 9, 1970, President Richard Nixon made an unplanned visit to the Lincoln Memorial where he spoke with anti-war protesters and students for almost two hours. The protesters were conducting a vigil in protest of Nixon's recent decision to expand the Vietnam War into Cambodia and the recent deaths of students in the Kent State shootings.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Court-martial of Susan Schnall</span> U.S. Navy nurse court-martialed for anti-Vietnam War activity

The court-martial of Susan Schnall, a lieutenant U.S. Navy nurse stationed at the Oakland Naval Hospital in Oakland, California, took place in early 1969 during the Vietnam War. Her political activities, which led to the military trial, may have garnered some of the most provocative news coverage during the early days of the U.S. antiwar movement against that war. In October 1968, the San Francisco Chronicle called her the “Peace Leaflet Bomber” for raining tens of thousands of antiwar leaflets from a small airplane over several San Francisco Bay Area military installations and the deck of an aircraft carrier. The day after this “bombing” run, she marched in her officer’s uniform at the front of a large antiwar demonstration, knowing it was against military regulations. While the Navy was court-martialing her for "conduct unbecoming an officer", she was publicly telling the press, "As far as I'm concerned, it's conduct unbecoming to officers to send men to die in Vietnam."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">The Newsreel</span> Formation, films and legacy of Newsreel

The Newsreel, most frequently called Newsreel, was an American filmmaking collective founded in New York City in late 1967. In keeping with the radical student/youth, antiwar and Black power movements of the time, the group explicitly described its purpose as using "films and other propaganda in aiding the revolutionary movement." The organization quickly established other chapters in San Francisco, Boston, Washington, DC, Atlanta, Detroit, Chicago, Los Angeles and Puerto Rico, and soon claimed "150 full time activists in its 9 regional offices." Co-founder Robert Kramer called for "films that unnerve, that shake people's assumptions…[that] explode like grenades in people’s faces, or open minds like a good can opener." Their film's production logo was a flashing graphic of The Newsreel moving in and out violently in cadence with the staccato sounds of a machine gun. A contemporary issue of Film Quarterly described it as "the cinematic equivalent of Leroi Jones's line 'I want poems that can shoot bullets.'" The films produced by Newsreel soon became regular viewing at leftwing political gatherings during the late 1960s and early 1970s; seen in "parks, church basements, on the walls of buildings, in union halls, even at Woodstock." This history has been largely ignored by film and academic historians causing the academic Nathan Rosenberger to remark: "it is curious that Newsreel only occasionally shows up in historical studies of the decade."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Myth of the spat-on Vietnam veteran</span> Allegations of the spitting on Vietnam veterans

There is a persistent myth or misconception that many Vietnam War veterans were spat on and vilified by antiwar protesters during the late 1960s and early 1970s. These stories, which overwhelmingly surfaced many years after the war, usually involve an antiwar female spitting on a veteran, often yelling "baby killer". Most occur in U.S. civilian airports, usually San Francisco International, as GIs returned from the war zone in their uniforms.

Carl Douglas Rogers (1954–2016) was an American anti-war activist, writer, Sunday School teacher, and cancer patient advocate. Briefly a chaplain's assistant in Vietnam, he publicly denounced the conflict, and in 1967, he became a co-founder and vice president of protest organization Vietnam Veterans Against the War.

Barry Romo was an American antiwar activist. He joined the US military as a second lieutenant in 1967 and was initially a strong support of the Vietnam War, but within four years had become a leader of Vietnam Veterans Against the War.

References

  1. 1 2 Moser, Richard R. (1996). The New Winter Soldiers: Gi and Veteran Dissent During the Vietnam Era. Rutgers University Press.
  2. 1 2 Stopher, Robert H. (1971-04-26). "Men of Conscience". Akron Beacon Journal. Nothing like this has ever happened before in our country
  3. 1 2 Vietnam Veterans Against the War; Kerry, John (1971). The New Soldier. New York, NY: The Macmillan Company.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Hunt, Andrew E. (May 2001). The Turning: A History of Vietnam Veterans Against the War. New York, NY: NYU Press. ISBN   978-0-8147-3635-7.
  5. 1 2 Harmon, Mark D (2011). Found, Featured, then Forgotten: U.S. Network TV News and the Vietnam Veterans Against the War. Knoxville, TN: Newfound Press. ISBN   978-0-9797292-8-7.
  6. 1 2 "Viet Vets Jam War Hearing Cheer McGovern Pullout Call". Boston Globe. Associated Press. 1971-04-20.
  7. "The Nation: Protest: A Week Against the War". time.com. 1971-05-03. Retrieved 2025-01-19.
  8. Stacewicz, Richard (1997). Winter Soldiers: An Oral History of the Vietnam Veterans Against the War. Twayne Publishers. ISBN   0-8057-4579-3.
  9. 1 2 "Veterans Discard Medals in War Protest". The New York Times. 1971-04-24.
  10. "Viet Vets Cry for Peace". The Plain Dealer. 1971-04-21. The demonstration in Washington this week, in which 2,000 grim combat veterans joined, was deeply impressive.
  11. "Voices of Authority". Philadelphia Daily News. 1971-04-22.
  12. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42896523?seq=8
  13. Haldeman, H. R. (1971-04-23). "H. R. Haldeman Diaries Collection, January 18, 1969 – April 30, 1973" (PDF). nixonlibrary.gov. Retrieved 2024-06-29.
  14. Dobbs, Michael (2004-08-28). "After Decades, Renewed War On Old Conflict". Washington Post.
  15. Williams, Brian (2004-03-15). "Nixon targeted Kerry for anti-war views". NBC News.
  16. https://www.salon.com/2004/04/28/medals/