Decision Relating to the Implementation of the Yamoussoukro Declaration Concerning the Liberalisation of Access to Air Transport Markets in Africa | |
---|---|
![]() Members of the Single African Air Transport Market, an implementation of the Yamoussoukro Decision. | |
Type | Air transport agreement |
Signed | 14 November 1999 [1] : 10 |
Location | Yamoussoukro, Ivory Coast [2] : 1 |
Ratified | 12 July 2000 [1] : 11 |
Depositary | African Union; originally Organization of African Unity [2] : 3 |
Languages | French and English [2] |
The Yamoussoukro Decision is a treaty adopted by most members of the African Union (AU) which establishes a framework for the liberalization of air transport services between African countries, as well as fair competition between airlines. The decision was signed by 44 African states in 1999, and became binding in 2002. [1] : 10–11 [2] : 1
The treaty grants first, second, third, fourth and fifth freedom transit rights between all its signatories, granting airlines based in member states greater freedoms in each others' airspaces. [3] It also seeks to eliminate restrictions on ownership of airlines as well as capacity and frequency limits on routes between signatory states. [4] The practical implementation of its policies has faced a number of setbacks, however, and has not been completed by all AU members. [1]
In 2018, the Single African Air Transport Market (SAATM) was launched, with the intent of fully implementing the Yamoussoukro Decision. [5]
Aviation has long been understood to be uniquely important in the African context, due to the low quality of alternative modes of transport like roads, shipping and rail as well as the economic potential of the continent's air transportation market. [3] [6] [7] : 194–195 Most inland and maritime infrastructure on the African continent prior to decolonization was built to transport resources to and from the coasts. Perceiving air traffic to be a means of circumventing the resulting lack of linkage between newly independent African states, the Organization of African Unity (OAU) declared in 1973 that air transport was "both far-reaching and essential for the development of Inter-African trade and for the improvement of the economic, social and cultural conditions of the African peoples." [1] : 2 The capacity for growth and profits in the sector, due to Africa's abundance of resources and large populations, has also been widely noted by observers. [6] [8] [9]
Upon gaining independence, many African nations developed their air services through a nationalized model, where state-owned air carriers funded more costly domestic transit with revenue from flights to and from former colonial metropoles. [1] : 2 As most air transport agreements had been based on arrangements between European colonizers, African countries also began to regulate traffic between themselves using the then common system of bilateral air service agreements (bilaterals). [7] : 195-196 [8] It has been argued that these agreements have hampered the development of inter-African flight routes, as both the country of origin and destination must license an airline before it can fly between them. [1] : 2 [10]
Following air service liberalization in the United States and European Union in the late 20th Century, African policymakers also began to move towards deregulating the continent's air transport. [6] Pressure to liberalize also began to emerge from domestic carriers, which wanted better access to new markets, as well as the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA). [1] : 2-3 Several initiatives were announced from the 1980s onwards, most notably the Yamoussoukro Declaration in 1988 and the Abuja Treaty in 1994. [6] This culminated in the signing of the Yamoussoukro Decision in 1999, establishing principles through which deregulation and pro-competition policies could be implemented in the aviation sector. [8] [10]
In a conference in Yamoussoukro, Ivory Coast held over 13–14 November 1999, representatives of several nations met to negotiate the further deregulation of air services across Africa. [11] The conference was organized in the wake of the 11th Conference of African Ministers Responsible for Transport and Communications, held in Cairo in November 1997, which recommended a meeting of ministers responsible for civil aviation in their respective countries to find ways of implementing the Yamoussoukro Declaration. A previous meeting in Mauritius in September 1994 also called for the Yamoussoukro Declaration to be implemented at a faster pace. The conference in Yamoussoukro concluded with the adoption of the Yamoussoukro Decision, which aims to gradually liberalize scheduled and non-scheduled inter-African air transport as defined in its Scope of Application. [7] : 199
The treaty grants the free exercise of the first, second, third, fourth and fifth freedoms of the air to eligible airlines (as defined in the treaty) conducting scheduled and non-scheduled passenger and freight flight services between state parties. [1] : 11 [3] [6] This allows flights to cross the airspaces and land on the territories of signatories with only prior notification. [3] In comparison to deregulation packages like those implemented by the European Union, which provides unlimited rights to the third, fourth, fifth, seventh, eighth and ninth freedoms, the Yamoussoukro Decision only calls for a gradual shift to the full third, fourth and fifth freedoms. [6] Article 3 of the treaty initially allowed states to limit fifth freedom rights to only specific circumstances, with said provision expiring 2 years after ratification on 12 August 2002. [2] : 4 [7] : 199
Non-physical barriers to frequency and capacity and tariffs are reduced by the Yamoussoukro Decision. [6] [12] : 27 Article 5 prevents the frequency and capacity of flights between any two cities from being restricted by state parties, and forbids its signatories to restrict capacity, number of flights, type of aircraft, or traffic rights, with the exception of certain environmental and technical factors. [1] : 11 [2] : 5 [6] Article 4 stipulates that approval does not need to be granted by a state party before an airline can increase tariffs, but proposed increases must be filed before competent authorities (i.e. aeronautical authorities) 30 working days before they come into effect. Decreases in tariffs take effect immediately. [2] : 4 [7] : 199 As the treaty applies only to international air traffic between signatories, Article 4 does not apply to domestic air services internal to state parties. [7] : 199
While Article 7 calls for state parties to ensure fair opportunity on a non-discriminatory basis to "designated African airline[s]" to facilitate competition, the distinction between fair and unfair regulations is not explicitly defined in the treaty. [2] : 7 [3] [12] : 32 However, Annex 2 (referred to by Article 8) is claimed by some scholars to imply that the Monitoring Body has the responsibility to perform arbitration procedures and determine competition rules, given its defined obligations to prepare the Annexes for adoption and state its view on unfair and predatory competition practices at the request of state parties. [2] : 18 Further power is granted by Article 9 to the African Air Transport Executing Agency to enforce fair competition rules and promote healthy competition. [2] : 8 [12] : 31
As set forth in Article 6, an eligible airline must demonstrate that it can meet the standards set by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), and reaffirm its obligation to standard safety standards and practices in civil aviation. Simultaneously, state parties are obligated to recognize all air operating certificates, certificates of airworthiness, certificates of competency and personnel licenses from other state parties that are still in force, given that said certificates and licenses have issuing requirements meeting the standards of the ICAO. [1] : 13 [2] : 6-7 Outside of the context of the treaty, the ICAO regularly assesses the compliance of contracting states with its safety and security regulations. Safety audits are publicly accessible, while security audits are made strictly confidential. [1] : 42-43
Implementation of the treaty varies based on the given state party and region. [1] : 37-38 [6] [8] Sub-regional committees like the West African Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU), Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC), Banjul Accord and Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA), as well as continent-level institutions like the African Civil Aviation Commission (AFCAC) and SAATM, have independently pursued implementation of different aspects of the treaty. [7] This decentralized approach has resulted in wide inequalities, as countries like Egypt, South Africa, Morocco, and Ethiopia have made greater progress in liberalizing air traffic and increasing connectivity than most states in Central Africa. [13] West African nations have been noted by observers to have made significant progress in implementing the treaty, with the WAEMU applying many of its principles in its internal market and the Banjul Accord having formed a multilateral air service agreement between member states. [14]
First announced in January 2018, the Single African Air Transport Market aims to implement the Yamoussoukro Decision on an AU-wide basis. [15] [9] As of 2017, the trade area encompassed 26 countries with a combined population of 527,000,000 and a total GDP of $624,000,000,000. [15] The project aims to implement Item 7 of the AU's Agenda 2063, which calls for the liberalization of the civil aviation market. [9] [14] Members of the common market are entitled to hold and provide air transport services in each other's territories, and automatically benefit from the traffic rights stipulated by the treaty. [14] States that have signed a "Solemn Commitment" to implement the terms of the treaty through the SAATM are required to report on their own progress and follow-up on each other, and have also committed to urging other AU member states to join the project. [15]
Evidence suggests that air connectivity has increased in many state parties to the treaty as a result of greater liberalization. [8] [13] [16] Departure frequencies of flights originating in Addis Ababa have been shown to be higher when said flights are connecting to states that have more thoroughly deregulated air traffic, and studies have indicated that flight frequency, available seat kilometres and the number of destinations and routes correlate with the policies stipulated by the decision. [8] [13] However, the majority of intra-African flight routes have not been liberalized, with bilaterals remaining the predominant form of air transport agreement between African countries. [8] [16] Restrictions on market access and capacity persist, as well as bureaucratic barriers which prevent wider integration of African aviation markets like visa requirements. [8] [9]
While a few state-owned carriers have shut down as a result of liberalization, the total number of airlines has significantly increased since the signing of the treaty. [1] : 124-125 [6] In 2013 there were 70 airlines based on the continent, more than double the number in 1994. [6] Another notable phenomenon is the entrance of new competitors into markets left vacant by failing carriers, using the fifth freedom of the air to service new destinations. [1] : 126 Some observers argue that this increase is a result of domestic reforms in some African countries allowing private carriers to compete, and there is little evidence that it is being directly caused by air liberalization between countries. [1] : 125 The harmonization of competition law between member states called for by the SAATM has not yet been fully implemented, and state-owned airlines retain tax advantages in many countries. [8] : 45 [9]
According to the World Bank, the Yamoussoukro Decision has been signed and ratified by all members of the AU except Djibouti, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Eswatini, Gabon, Madagascar, Mauritania, Morocco, Somalia and South Africa. [1] : 23-24 This leaves the following states legal parties to the treaty (excluding those currently suspended from the AU):
Multilateral organizations in Africa have been largely supportive of the Yamoussoukro Decision. [4] [8] African Development Bank vice president Pierre Guislain declared in 2018 that the bank was "keen to support practical efforts by countries, regional organisations and companies from the aviation sector to increase connectivity and open up the African skies." [17] Full implementation of the treaty through the SAATM is an explicit objective of the African Union, and is incorporated in the organization's Agenda 2063 program. [4] [14] In addition, countries with large airlines such as Rwanda and Togo have been strong proponents of the treaty, arguing that the creation of a single market will benefit the African aviation sector. [4] [8]
Many countries and organizations have been critical of the agreement, arguing that it will hurt smaller airlines and allow already large carriers like Ethiopian Airlines and South African Airways to dominate. [1] : 13 [8] Airline Operators of Nigeria (AON), an association of Nigerian airlines, denounced the SAATM and lobbied the Nigerian government to avoid implementing the single market. [4] [12] [11] Advocating instead for the formation of regional airlines prior to further air liberalization, Ugandan president Yoweri Musevini opined in 2018 that a "[f]ew airlines are going to dominate and that is not good." [4]
The International Air Transport Association (IATA) has commended the adoption of the Yamoussoukro Decision by the African Union, describing it as "cover[ing] competition and consumer protection and dispute settlement as these safeguard the efficient operation of the market." [18] The organization predicted in 2014 that increased air connectivity could lead to an 80% increase in passenger traffic and 155,000 jobs. [5] [17] [11] The United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA) and World Bank have also strongly supported the implementation of the treaty. [1] [8] Academics have largely approved of the terms of the decision, but some have criticized its implementation as geographically uneven and not sufficiently sweeping. [1] [6] [10]
Countries outside of Africa have expressed interest in supporting the implementation of the treaty through investment and aid. During the 8th Ministerial Conference of the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC), the Chinese government announced it would encourage Chinese firms to participate in public-private partnerships (PPPs) and other projects related to the SAATM. [19] The European Union has also committed to a €5,000,000 project with the African Union, assisting AFCAC in its role as the implementing agency of SAATM, assisting current members of the market in implementation and encouraging non-members to participate. [20]
An airline is a company that provides air transport services for traveling passengers and/or freight. Airlines use aircraft to supply these services and may form partnerships or alliances with other airlines for codeshare agreements, in which they both offer and operate the same flight. Generally, airline companies are recognized with an air operating certificate or license issued by a governmental aviation body. Airlines may be scheduled or charter operators.
Ivory Coast invested remarkably in its transport system. Transport Infrastructures are much more developed than they are other West African countries despite a crisis that restrained their maintenance and development. Since its independence in 1960, Ivory Coast put an emphasis on increasing and modernizing the transport network for human as well as for goods. Major infrastructures of diverse nature were built including railways, roads, waterways, and airports. In spite of the crisis, neighbor countries still strongly depend on the Ivorian transport network for importing, exporting, and transiting their immigrants to Ivory Coast.
The International Air Transport Association is a trade association of the world's airlines founded in 1945. IATA has been described as a cartel since, in addition to setting technical standards for airlines, IATA also organized tariff conferences that served as a forum for price fixing.
Airline deregulation is the process of removing government-imposed entry and price restrictions on airlines affecting, in particular, the carriers permitted to serve specific routes. In the United States, the term usually applies to the Airline Deregulation Act of 1978. A new form of regulation has been developed to some extent to deal with problems such as the allocation of the limited number of slots available at airports.
The freedoms of the air, also called five freedoms of air transport, are a set of commercial aviation rights granting a country's airlines the privilege to enter and land in another country's airspace. They were formulated as a result of disagreements over the extent of aviation liberalisation in the Convention on International Civil Aviation of 1944, known as the Chicago Convention. The United States had called for a standardized set of separate air rights to be negotiated between states, but most other countries were concerned that the size of the U.S. airlines would dominate air travel if there were not strict rules. The freedoms of the air are the fundamental building blocks of the international commercial aviation route network. The use of the terms "freedom" and "right" confers entitlement to operate international air services only within the scope of the multilateral and bilateral treaties that allow them.
The Bermuda Agreement, reached in 1946 by American and British negotiators in Bermuda, was an early bilateral air transport agreement regulating civil air transport. It established a precedent for the signing of approximately 3,000 other such agreements between countries. The Agreement was replaced by the Bermuda II Agreement, which was signed in 1977 and effective in 1978.
Cabotage is the transport of goods or passengers between two places in the same country. It originally applied to shipping along coastal routes, port to port, but now applies to aviation, railways, and road transport as well.
An airline hub or hub airport is an airport used by one or more airlines to concentrate passenger traffic and flight operations. Hubs serve as transfer points to help get passengers to their final destination. It is part of the hub-and-spoke system. An airline may operate flights from several non-hub (spoke) cities to the hub airport, and passengers traveling between spoke cities connect through the hub. This paradigm creates economies of scale that allow an airline to serve city-pairs that could otherwise not be economically served on a non-stop basis. This system contrasts with the point-to-point model, in which there are no hubs and nonstop flights are instead offered between spoke cities. Hub airports also serve origin and destination (O&D) traffic.
Bermuda II was a bilateral air transport agreement between the governments of the United Kingdom and the United States signed on 23 July 1977 as a renegotiation of the original 1946 Bermuda air services agreement. A new open skies agreement was signed by the United States and the European Union (EU) on 30 April 2007 and came into effect on 30 March 2008, thus replacing Bermuda II.
An air transport agreement is a bilateral agreement to allow international commercial air transport services between signatories.
Aviation law is the branch of law that concerns flight, air travel, and associated legal and business concerns. Some of its area of concern overlaps that of admiralty law and, in many cases, aviation law is considered a matter of international law due to the nature of air travel. However, the business aspects of airlines and their regulation also fall under aviation law. In the international realm, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) provides general rules and mediates international concerns to an extent regarding aviation law. The ICAO is a specialized agency of the United Nations.
The European Common Aviation Area (ECAA) is a single market in aviation services.
The EU–US Open Skies Agreement is an open skies air transport agreement between the European Union (EU) and the United States (US). The agreement allows any airline of the European Union and any airline of the United States to fly between any point in the European Union and any point in the United States. Both EU and US airlines are allowed to fly on to a further destination in another country after their initial stop. Because the EU is not treated as a single territory for the purposes of the agreement, this means in practice that US airlines can fly between two points in the EU as long as that flight is the continuation of a flight that started in the US. Airlines of the EU are also allowed to fly between the US and non-EU countries that are part of the European Common Aviation Area, like Switzerland. EU and US airlines can operate all-cargo flights under Seventh Freedom rights, meaning US airlines' all-cargo flights can be operated from one EU country to any other country and EU airlines' all-cargo flights can operate between the US and any other country. Norway and Iceland acceded to the Agreement from 2011 and their airlines enjoy the same rights as EU airlines.
Civil aviation is one of two major categories of flying, representing all non-military and non-state aviation, both private and commercial. Most countries in the world are members of the International Civil Aviation Organization and work together to establish common Standards and Recommended Practices for civil aviation through that agency.
The so-called "Emirates business model" is the business model that lies at the heart of Emirates's commercial success. Its main ingredients are a lean workforce comparable to a low-cost carrier and a flat organisational structure that allows the airline to maintain low overhead costs.
ASEAN Single Aviation Market (ASEAN-SAM) also known as ASEAN Open Sky Agreement/Policy, is the region's major aviation policy. It is geared towards the development of a unified and single aviation market among ASEAN members in Southeast Asia projected to begin 1 January 2015, though all agreements have not been signed. The aviation policy was proposed by the ASEAN Air Transport Working Group, supported by the ASEAN Senior Transport Officials Meeting, and endorsed by ASEAN Transport Ministers. The creation of the ASEAN-SAM was a key component of the road map for the establishment of the ASEAN Economic Community.
Aviation in India, broadly divided into military and civil aviation, is the fastest-growing aviation market in the world according to the International Air Transport Association (IATA). The hub of the nation's aviation manufacturing industry is at Bangalore which has a 65% share of this economic sector since 1924. The government's UDAN is driving the growth of civil aviation and aviation infrastructure in India.
Civil aviation in India, the world's third-largest civil aviation market as of 2020, traces its origin back to 1911, when the first commercial civil aviation flight took off from a polo ground in Allahabad carrying mail across the Yamuna river to Naini.
The Single African Air Transport Market (SAATM) is a project of the African Union to create a single market for air transport in Africa. Once completely in force, the single market is supposed to allow significant freedom of air transport in Africa, advancing the AU's Agenda 2063.
Taxation of aviation fuel in the European Union is regulated by the Energy Taxation Directive (2003/96/EG) of 27 October 2003. This prohibits the taxation of commercial aviation fuel, except for commercial domestic flights or by bilateral agreement between member states. As of 2023, commercial aviation fuel is currently tax exempt under the legislation of all member states of the European Union. This tax exemption has been criticised on environmental grounds.
{{cite news}}
: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)