Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

Last updated
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
DEXA scanner in use ALSPAC.jpg
OPS-301 code 3-900

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA, or DEXA [1] ) is a means of measuring bone mineral density (BMD) using spectral imaging. Two X-ray beams, with different energy levels, are aimed at the patient's bones. When soft tissue absorption is subtracted out, the bone mineral density (BMD) can be determined from the absorption of each beam by bone. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry is the most widely used and most thoroughly studied bone density measurement technology.

Contents

The DXA scan is typically used to diagnose and follow osteoporosis, as contrasted to the nuclear bone scan, which is sensitive to certain metabolic diseases of bones in which bones are attempting to heal from infections, fractures, or tumors. It is also sometimes used to assess body composition.

Physics

Soft tissue and bone have different attenuation coefficients to X-rays. A single X-ray beam passing through the body will be attenuated by both soft tissue and bone, and it is not possible to determine, from a single beam, how much attenuation was attributable to the bone. However, the attenuation coefficients vary with the energy of the X-rays, and, crucially, the ratio of the attenuation coefficients also varies. DXA uses two energies of X-ray. The difference in total absorption between the two can be used, by suitable weighting, to subtract out the absorption by soft tissue, leaving just the absorption by bone, which is related to bone density.

One type of DXA scanner uses a cerium filter with a tube voltage of 80 kV, resulting in effective photon energies of about 40 and 70 keV. [2] There is also a DXA scanner type using a samarium filter with a tube voltage of 100 kV, resulting in effective energies of 47 and 80 keV. [2] Also, the tube voltage can be continuously switched between a low (for example 70 kV) and high (for example 140 kV) value in synchronism with the frequency of the electrical mains, resulting in effective energies alternating between 45 and 100 keV. [2]

The combination of dual X-ray absorptiometry and laser uses the laser to measure the thickness of the region scanned, allowing for varying proportions of lean soft tissue and adipose tissue within the soft tissue to be controlled for and improving the accuracy.

Bone density measurement

Blausen 0095 BoneDensitometryScan.png

Indications

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends that women over the age of 65 should get a DXA scan. [3] The date at which men should be tested is uncertain [3] but some sources recommend age 70. [4] At risk women should consider getting a scan when their risk is equal to that of a normal 65-year-old woman.

A person's risk can be measured using the University of Sheffield's FRAX calculator, which includes many different clinical risk factors including prior fragility fracture, use of glucocorticoids, heavy smoking, excess alcohol intake, rheumatoid arthritis, history of parental hip fracture, chronic renal and liver disease, chronic respiratory disease, long-term use of phenobarbital or phenytoin, celiac disease, inflammatory bowel disease, and other risks. [3]

Scoring

DEXA assessment of bone mineral density of the femoral neck (A) and the lumbar spine (B): T scores of - 4.2 and - 4.3 were found at the hip (A) and lumbar spine (B), respectively in a 53-year-old male patient affected with Fabry disease. Morbus Fabry DXA 01.jpg
DEXA assessment of bone mineral density of the femoral neck (A) and the lumbar spine (B): T scores of - 4.2 and - 4.3 were found at the hip (A) and lumbar spine (B), respectively in a 53-year-old male patient affected with Fabry disease.

The World Health Organization has defined the following categories based on bone density in white women:

Severe (established) osteoporosisA T-score more than -2.5 standard deviations below the young adult female reference mean in the presence of one or more fragility fractures.

Bone densities are often given to patients as a T score or a Z score. A T score tells the patient what their bone mineral density is in comparison to a young adult of the same gender with peak bone mineral density. A normal T score is -1.0 and above, low bone density is between -1.0 and -2.5, and osteoporosis is -2.5 and lower. A Z score is just a comparison of what a patient's bone mineral density is in comparison to the average bone mineral density of a male or female of their age and weight.

The WHO committee did not have enough data to create definitions for men or other ethnic groups. [5]

Special considerations are involved in the use of DXA to assess bone mass in children. Specifically, comparing the bone mineral density of children to the reference data of adults (to calculate a T-score) will underestimate the BMD of children, because children have less bone mass than fully developed adults. This would lead to an over-diagnosis of osteopenia for children. To avoid an overestimation of bone mineral deficits, BMD scores are commonly compared to reference data for the same gender and age (by calculating a Z-score).

Also, there are other variables in addition to age that are suggested to confound the interpretation of BMD as measured by DXA. One important confounding variable is bone size. DXA has been shown to overestimate the bone mineral density of taller subjects and underestimate the bone mineral density of smaller subjects. This error is due to the way by which DXA calculates BMD. In DXA, bone mineral content (measured as the attenuation of the X-ray by the bones being scanned) is divided by the area (also measured by the machine) of the site being scanned.

Because DXA calculates BMD using area (aBMD: areal Bone Mineral Density), it is not an accurate measurement of true bone mineral density, which is mass divided by a volume. In order to distinguish DXA BMD from volumetric bone-mineral density, researchers sometimes refer to DXA BMD as an areal bone mineral density (aBMD). The confounding effect of differences in bone size is due to the missing depth value in the calculation of bone mineral density. Despite DXA technology's problems with estimating volume, it is still a fairly accurate measure of bone mineral content. Methods to correct for this shortcoming include the calculation of a volume that is approximated from the projected area measure by DXA. DXA BMD results adjusted in this manner are referred to as the bone mineral apparent density (BMAD) and are a ratio of the bone mineral content versus a cuboidal estimation of the volume of bone. Like the results for aBMD, BMAD results do not accurately represent true bone mineral density, since they use approximations of the bone's volume. BMAD is used primarily for research purposes and is not yet used in clinical settings.

Other imaging technologies such as quantitative computed tomography (QCT) are capable of measuring the bone's volume, and are, therefore, not susceptible to the confounding effect of bone-size in the way that DXA results are susceptible.

It is important for patients to get repeat BMD measurements done on the same machine each time, or at least a machine from the same manufacturer. Error between machines, or trying to convert measurements from one manufacturer's standard to another can introduce errors large enough to wipe out the sensitivity of the measurements.[ citation needed ]

DXA results need to be adjusted if the patient is taking strontium supplements. [6] [ better source needed ] [7]

DXA can also used to measure trabecular bone score.

Current clinical practice in pediatrics

DXA is, by far, the most widely used technique for bone mineral density measurements, since it is considered to be cheap, accessible, easy to use, and able to provide an accurate estimation of bone mineral density in adults. [8]

The official position of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) is that a patient may be tested for BMD if they have a condition that could precipitate bone loss, is going to be prescribed pharmaceuticals known to cause bone loss, or is being treated and needs to be monitored. The ISCD states that there is no clearly understood correlation between BMD and the risk of a child's sustaining a fracture; the diagnosis of osteoporosis in children cannot be made using the basis of a densitometry criteria. T-scores are prohibited with children and should not even appear on DXA reports. Thus, the WHO classification of osteoporosis and osteopenia in adults cannot be applied to children, but Z-scores can be used to assist diagnosis. [9]

Some clinics may routinely carry out DXA scans on pediatric patients with conditions such as nutritional rickets, lupus, and Turner syndrome. [10] DXA has been demonstrated to measure skeletal maturity [11] and body fat composition [12] and has been used to evaluate the effects of pharmaceutical therapy. [13] It may also aid pediatricians in diagnosing and monitoring treatment of disorders of bone mass acquisition in childhood. [14]

However, it seems that DXA is still in its early days in pediatrics, and there are widely acknowledged limitations and disadvantages with DXA. A view exists [15] that DXA scans for diagnostic purposes should not even be performed outside specialist centers, and, if a scan is done outside one of these centers, it should not be interpreted without consultation with an expert in the field. [15] Furthermore, most of the pharmaceuticals given to adults with low bone mass can be given to children only in strictly monitored clinical trials.

Whole-body calcium measured by DXA has been validated in adults using in-vivo neutron activation of total body calcium [16] [17] but this is not suitable for paediatric subjects and studies have been carried out on paediatric-sized animals. [16] [17]

Body composition measurement

DXA Fat shadow of an obese individual Picture1 fs.png
DXA Fat shadow of an obese individual

DXA scans can also be used to measure total body composition and fat content with a high degree of accuracy comparable to hydrostatic weighing with a few important caveats. [18] [ specify ] From the DXA scans, a low resolution "fat shadow" image can also be generated, which gives an overall impression of fat distribution throughout the body [19] It has been suggested that, while very accurately measuring minerals and lean soft tissue (LST), DXA may provide skewed results due to its method of indirectly calculating fat mass by subtracting it from the LST and/or body cell mass (BCM) that DXA actually measures. [20]

DXA scans have been suggested as useful tools to diagnose conditions with an abnormal fat distribution, such as familial partial lipodystrophy. [21] [22] [19] They are also used to assess adiposity in children, especially to conduct clinical research. [23]

DXA Fat shadow of a child with rare congenital generalized lipodystrophy DXA Fat shadow.png
DXA Fat shadow of a child with rare congenital generalized lipodystrophy

Radiation exposure

DXA uses X-rays to measure bone mineral density. The radiation dose of current DEXA systems is small, [24] as low as 0.001 mSv, much less than a standard chest or dental x-ray. [25] [26] However, the dose delivered by older DEXA radiation sources (that used radioisotopes rather than x-ray generators) could be as high as 35 mGy, [27] [28] [29] considered a significant dose by radiological health standards.

Regulation

United States

The quality of DXA operators varies widely. DXA is not regulated like other radiation-based imaging techniques because of its low dosage. Each US state has a different policy as to what certifications are needed to operate a DXA machine. California, for example, requires coursework and a state-run test, whereas Maryland has no requirements for DXA technicians. Many states require a training course and certificate from the International Society of Clinical Densitometry (ISCD).

Australia

In Australia, regulation differs according to the applicable state or territory. For example, in Victoria, an individual performing DXA scans is required to completed a recognised course in safe use of bone mineral densitometers. [30] In NSW and QLD a DXA technician only requires prior study in science, nursing or other related undergraduate study. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) oversees licensing of technicians, however, this is far from rigorous and regulation is non-existent.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Osteoporosis</span> Skeletal disorder

Osteoporosis is a systemic skeletal disorder characterized by low bone mass, micro-architectural deterioration of bone tissue leading to more porous bone, and consequent increase in fracture risk. It is the most common reason for a broken bone among the elderly. Bones that commonly break include the vertebrae in the spine, the bones of the forearm, the wrist, and the hip. Until a broken bone occurs there are typically no symptoms. Bones may weaken to such a degree that a break may occur with minor stress or spontaneously. After the broken bone heals, the person may have chronic pain and a decreased ability to carry out normal activities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Radiography</span> Imaging technique using ionizing and non-ionizing radiation

Radiography is an imaging technique using X-rays, gamma rays, or similar ionizing radiation and non-ionizing radiation to view the internal form of an object. Applications of radiography include medical and industrial radiography. Similar techniques are used in airport security,. To create an image in conventional radiography, a beam of X-rays is produced by an X-ray generator and it is projected towards the object. A certain amount of the X-rays or other radiation are absorbed by the object, dependent on the object's density and structural composition. The X-rays that pass through the object are captured behind the object by a detector. The generation of flat two-dimensional images by this technique is called projectional radiography. In computed tomography, an X-ray source and its associated detectors rotate around the subject, which itself moves through the conical X-ray beam produced. Any given point within the subject is crossed from many directions by many different beams at different times. Information regarding the attenuation of these beams is collated and subjected to computation to generate two-dimensional images on three planes which can be further processed to produce a three-dimensional image.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Radiology</span> Branch of medicine

Radiology is the medical specialty that uses medical imaging to diagnose diseases and guide their treatment, within the bodies of humans and other animals. It began with radiography, but today it includes all imaging modalities, including those that use no ionizing electromagnetic radiation, as well as others that do, such as computed tomography (CT), fluoroscopy, and nuclear medicine including positron emission tomography (PET). Interventional radiology is the performance of usually minimally invasive medical procedures with the guidance of imaging technologies such as those mentioned above.

Densitometry is the quantitative measurement of optical density in light-sensitive materials, such as photographic paper or photographic film, due to exposure to light.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Osteopenia</span> Medical condition

Osteopenia, known as "low bone mass" or "low bone density", is a condition in which bone mineral density is low. Because their bones are weaker, people with osteopenia may have a higher risk of fractures, and some people may go on to develop osteoporosis. In 2010, 43 million older adults in the US had osteopenia. Unlike osteoporosis, osteopenia does not usually cause symptoms, and losing bone density in itself does not cause pain.

The body fat percentage (BFP) of a human or other living being is the total mass of fat divided by total body mass, multiplied by 100; body fat includes essential body fat and storage body fat. Essential body fat is necessary to maintain life and reproductive functions. The percentage of essential body fat for women is greater than that for men, due to the demands of childbearing and other hormonal functions. Storage body fat consists of fat accumulation in adipose tissue, part of which protects internal organs in the chest and abdomen. A number of methods are available for determining body fat percentage, such as measurement with calipers or through the use of bioelectrical impedance analysis.

In physical fitness, body composition refers to quantifying the different components of a human body. The selection of compartments varies by model but may include fat, bone, water, and muscle. Two people of the same gender, height, and body weight may have completely different body types as a consequence of having different body compositions. This may be explained by a person having low or high body fat, dense muscles, or big bones.

Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a method for estimating body composition, in particular body fat and muscle mass, where a weak electric current flows through the body and the voltage is measured in order to calculate impedance of the body. Most body water is stored in muscle. Therefore, if a person is more muscular there is a high chance that the person will also have more body water, which leads to lower impedance. Since the advent of the first commercially available devices in the mid-1980s the method has become popular owing to its ease of use and portability of the equipment. It is familiar in the consumer market as a simple instrument for estimating body fat. BIA actually determines the electrical impedance, or opposition to the flow of an electric current through body tissues which can then be used to estimate total body water (TBW), which can be used to estimate fat-free body mass and, by difference with body weight, body fat.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bone density</span> Amount of bone mineral in bone tissue

Bone density, or bone mineral density, is the amount of bone mineral in bone tissue. The concept is of mass of mineral per volume of bone, although clinically it is measured by proxy according to optical density per square centimetre of bone surface upon imaging. Bone density measurement is used in clinical medicine as an indirect indicator of osteoporosis and fracture risk. It is measured by a procedure called densitometry, often performed in the radiology or nuclear medicine departments of hospitals or clinics. The measurement is painless and non-invasive and involves low radiation exposure. Measurements are most commonly made over the lumbar spine and over the upper part of the hip. The forearm may be scanned if the hip and lumbar spine are not accessible.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Quantitative computed tomography</span>

Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) is a medical technique that measures bone mineral density (BMD) using a standard X-ray computed tomography (CT) scanner with a calibration standard to convert Hounsfield units (HU) of the CT image to bone mineral density values. Quantitative CT scans are primarily used to evaluate bone mineral density at the lumbar spine and hip.

Senile osteoporosis has been recently recognized as a geriatric syndrome with a particular pathophysiology. There are different classification of osteoporosis: primary, in which bone loss is a result of aging and secondary, in which bone loss occurs from various clinical and lifestyle factors. Primary, or involuntary osteoporosis, can further be classified into Type I or Type II. Type I refers to postmenopausal osteoporosis and is caused by the deficiency of estrogen. While senile osteoporosis is categorized as an involuntary, Type II, and primary osteoporosis, which affects both men and women over the age of 70 years. It is accompanied by vitamin D deficiency, body's failure to absorb calcium, and increased parathyroid hormone.

Digital X-ray radiogrammetry is a method for measuring bone mineral density (BMD). Digital X-ray radiogrammetry is based on the old technique of radiogrammetry. In DXR, the cortical thickness of the three middle metacarpal bones of the hand is measured in a digital X-ray image. Through a geometrical operation the thickness is converted to bone mineral density. The BMD is corrected for porosity of the bone, estimated by a texture analysis performed on the cortical part of the bone.

Steroid-induced osteoporosis is osteoporosis arising from the use of glucocorticoids analogous to Cushing's syndrome but involving mainly the axial skeleton. The synthetic glucocorticoid prescription drug prednisone is a main candidate after prolonged intake. Bisphosphonates are beneficial in reducing the risk of vertebral fractures. Some professional guidelines recommend prophylactic calcium and vitamin D supplementation in patients who take the equivalent of more than 30 mg hydrocortisone, especially when this is in excess of three months. The use of thiazide diuretics, and gonadal hormone replacement has also been recommended, with the use of calcitonin, bisphosphonates, sodium fluoride or anabolic steroids also suggested in refractory cases. Alternate day use may not prevent this complication.

The trabecular bone score is a measure of bone texture correlated with bone microarchitecture and a marker for the risk of osteoporosis. Introduced in 2008, its main projected use is alongside measures of bone density in better predicting fracture risk in people with metabolic bone problems.

Dual X-ray absorptiometry and laser technique (DXL) in the area of bone density studies for osteoporosis assessment is an improvement to the DXA Technique, adding an exact laser measurement of the thickness of the region scanned. The addition of object thickness adds a third input to the two x-ray energies used by DXA, better solving the equation for bone and excluding more efficiently these soft tissues components.

Single photon absorptiometry is a measuring method for bone density invented by John R. Cameron and James A. Sorenson in 1963.

Ignac Fogelman was a professor of Nuclear Medicine at King’s College London, Honorary Consultant Physician at Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Trust, and Director of the Osteoporosis Screening & Research Unit at Guy’s Hospital. He was born in 1948 in Germany and died on 5 July 2016 in the United Kingdom. He is known as the father of bone imaging by some researchers and academics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry</span> Medical diagnostic

Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry (REMS) is a non-ionizing technology for osteoporosis diagnosis and for fracture risk assessment. REMS processes the raw, unfiltered ultrasound signals acquired during an echographic scan of the axial sites, femur and spine. The analysis is performed in the frequency domain. Bone mineral density (BMD) is estimated by comparing the results against reference models.

John A. Shepherd is an American physicist, professor of epidemiology and population sciences and director of the Shepherd Research Laboratory at the University of Hawaii Cancer Center in Honolulu, Hawaii. He is an expert in the use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for quantitative bone and soft tissue imaging, and pioneered the use of 3D optical imaging of the whole body for quantifying body composition and associated diseases including cancer risk, obesity, diabetes, and frailty. In 2016, he was the President of the Board of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

Catherine Mason Gordon is an American pediatrician who is the Clinical Director of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health.

References

  1. "Bone mineral density test". U.S. National Library of Medicine.
  2. 1 2 3 "Physical Principles and Measurement Accuracy of Bone Densitometry" (PDF). National Osteoporosis Society . Archived from the original (PDF) on 2018-02-06. Retrieved 2018-02-05.
  3. 1 2 3 "Screening for Osteoporosis". uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. January 2011. Archived from the original on 30 May 2013. Retrieved 20 August 2012.
  4. American Academy of Family Physicians, "Five Things Physicians and Patients Should Question" (PDF), Choosing Wisely: an initiative of the ABIM Foundation , American Academy of Family Physicians, archived from the original (PDF) on June 24, 2012, retrieved August 14, 2012
  5. "Bone densitometry". Courses.washington.edu. Retrieved 2013-05-22.
  6. "Strontium dexa scan adjustments". Osteopenia3.com. Retrieved 2013-05-22.
  7. Blake GM, Fogelman I (2007). "Effect of bone strontium on BMD measurements". J Clin Densitom. 10 (1): 34–8. doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2006.10.004. PMID   17289524.
  8. Gilsanz V (January 1998). "Bone density in children: a review of the available techniques and indications". Eur J Radiol. 26 (2): 177–82. doi:10.1016/S0720-048X(97)00093-4. PMID   9518226.
  9. "2007 ISCD Official Positions". Archived from the original on 2012-05-09. Retrieved 2012-05-24.
  10. Binkovitz LA, Henwood MJ (January 2007). "Pediatric DXA: technique and interpretation". Pediatr Radiol. 37 (1): 21–31. doi:10.1007/s00247-006-0153-y. PMC   1764599 . PMID   16715219.
  11. Płudowski P, Lebiedowski M, Lorenc RS (April 2004). "Evaluation of the possibility to assess bone age on the basis of DXA derived hand scans-preliminary results". Osteoporos Int. 15 (4): 317–22. doi:10.1007/s00198-003-1545-6. PMID   14615883. S2CID   26672947.
  12. Sung RY, Lau P, Yu CW, Lam PK, Nelson EA (September 2001). "Measurement of body fat using leg to leg bioimpedance". Arch. Dis. Child. 85 (3): 263–7. doi:10.1136/adc.85.3.263. PMC   1718893 . PMID   11517118.
  13. Barnes C, Newall F, Ignjatovic V, Wong P, Cameron F, Jones G, Monagle P (April 2005). "Reduced bone density in children on long-term warfarin". Pediatr. Res. 57 (4): 578–81. doi: 10.1203/01.PDR.0000155943.07244.04 . PMID   15695604.
  14. van der Sluis IM, de Ridder MA, Boot AM, Krenning EP, de Muinck Keizer-Schrama SM (October 2002). "Reference data for bone density and body composition measured with dual energy x ray absorptiometry in white children and young adults". Arch. Dis. Child. 87 (4): 341–7, discussion 341–7. doi:10.1136/adc.87.4.341. PMC   1763043 . PMID   12244017.
  15. 1 2 Picaud JC, Duboeuf F, Vey-Marty V, Delams P, Claris O, Salle BL, Rigo J (2003). "First all-solid pediatric phantom for dual X-ray absorptiometry measurements in infants". J Clin Densitom. 6 (1): 17–23. doi:10.1385/JCD:6:1:17. PMID   12665698.
  16. 1 2 Margulies L, Horlick M, Thornton JC, Wang J, Ioannidou E, Heymsfield SB (2005). "Reproducibility of pediatric whole body bone and body composition measures by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry using the GE Lunar Prodigy". J Clin Densitom. 8 (3): 298–304. doi:10.1385/JCD:8:3:298. PMID   16055960.
  17. 1 2 Horlick M, Thornton J, Wang J, Levine LS, Fedun B, Pierson RN (July 2000). "Bone mineral in prepubertal children: gender and ethnicity". J. Bone Miner. Res. 15 (7): 1393–7. doi:10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.7.1393. PMID   10893689. S2CID   24475001.
  18. St-Onge MP, Wang J, Shen W, Wang Z, Allison DB, Heshka S, Pierson RN, Heymsfield SB (August 2004). "Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry-measured lean soft tissue mass: differing relation to body cell mass across the adult life span". J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 59 (8): 796–800. doi: 10.1093/gerona/59.8.B796 . PMID   15345728.
  19. 1 2 Meral R, Ryan BJ, Malandrino N, Jalal A, Neidert AH, Muniyappa R, Akıncı B, Horowitz JF, Brown RJ, Oral EA (October 2018). ""Fat Shadows" From DXA for the Qualitative Assessment of Lipodystrophy: When a Picture Is Worth a Thousand Numbers". Diabetes Care. 41 (10): 2255–2258. doi:10.2337/dc18-0978. PMC   6150431 . PMID   30237235.
  20. Manninen AH (January 2006). "Very-low-carbohydrate diets and preservation of muscle mass". Nutr Metab (Lond). 3: 9. doi: 10.1186/1743-7075-3-9 . PMC   1373635 . PMID   16448570.
  21. Ajluni N, Meral R, Neidert AH, Brady GF, Buras E, McKenna B, DiPaola F, Chenevert TL, Horowitz JF, Buggs-Saxton C, Rupani AR, Thomas PE, Tayeh MK, Innis JW, Omary MB, Conjeevaram H, Oral EA (May 2017). "Spectrum of disease associated with partial lipodystrophy: lessons from a trial cohort". Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf). 86 (5): 698–707. doi:10.1111/cen.13311. PMC   5395301 . PMID   28199729.
  22. Guillín-Amarelle C, Sánchez-Iglesias S, Castro-Pais A, Rodriguez-Cañete L, Ordóñez-Mayán L, Pazos M, González-Méndez B, Rodríguez-García S, Casanueva FF, Fernández-Marmiesse A, Araújo-Vilar D (November 2016). "Type 1 familial partial lipodystrophy: understanding the Köbberling syndrome". Endocrine. 54 (2): 411–421. doi:10.1007/s12020-016-1002-x. ISSN   1559-0100. PMID   27473102. S2CID   19689303.
  23. Kakinami L, Henderson M, Chiolero A, Cole TJ, Paradis G (November 2014). "Identifying the best body mass index metric to assess adiposity change in children". Arch. Dis. Child. 99 (11): 1020–4. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2013-305163. PMC   4215345 . PMID   24842797.
  24. "Patient Safety - Radiation Dose in X-Ray and CT Exams". RadiologyInfo.org. Radiological Society of North America. 2012-04-25. Retrieved 2013-05-22.
  25. "Bone Densitometry (DEXA, DXA)". RadiologyInfo.org. Radiological Society of North America. Archived from the original on June 16, 2018. Retrieved December 8, 2018.
  26. Radiology (ACR), Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) and American College of. "Patient Safety - Radiation Dose in X-Ray and CT Exams". www.radiologyinfo.org. Retrieved 2019-03-12.
  27. Lewis MK, Blake GM, Fogelman I (January 1994). "Patient dose in dual x-ray absorptiometry". Osteoporos Int. 4 (1): 11–5. doi:10.1007/BF02352255. PMID   8148566. S2CID   6225880.
  28. Blake GM, Fogelman I (July 1997). "Technical principles of dual energy x-ray absorptiometry". Semin Nucl Med. 27 (3): 210–28. doi:10.1016/S0001-2998(97)80025-6. PMID   9224663.
  29. Njeh CF, Fuerst T, Hans D, Blake GM, Genant HK (January 1999). "Radiation exposure in bone mineral density assessment". Appl Radiat Isot. 50 (1): 215–36. doi:10.1016/S0969-8043(98)00026-8. PMID   10028639.
  30. "Bone mineral densitometer operators". Health Department (Government of Victoria). health.vic. Retrieved 11 October 2021.