Antisexualism

Last updated

Antisexualism is opposition or hostility towards sexual behavior and sexuality. [1]

Contents

Terminology

Other terms whose meanings overlap or are synonymous or interchangeable with antisexualism include sex-negativism, [2] sex-negative movement, [3] sex-negativity, [4] antisexuality, [5] demonization of sex [6] or as an adjective, anti-sex or sex-negative. [7] [8] In a broader scope, it may refer to a general opposition to sexuality, [9] especially tending to reduce or eliminate the sex drive or sexual activity [10] or a prudish and coitophobic force in society that suppresses sexual freedom and disseminates antisexual opinions. [11] [12] When such an aversion involves hatred, it is sometimes called miserotia or miserotism. [13]

Religious

Some forms of early ascetic Gnosticism held all matter to be evil, and that unnecessary gratifications of the physical senses were to be avoided. Married couples were encouraged to be chaste. [14] [15] In the first century, Marcion of Sinope held an antisexual and ascetic outlook. [16] The Skoptsys were a radical sect of the Russian Orthodox Church that practiced castration and amputation of sexual organs. The Skoptsy believed that Christ had been castrated during his crucifixion, and it was this castration that brought about salvation. [17] Boston Corbett, who was involved in killing John Wilkes Booth, castrated himself after being mocked and tempted by prostitutes. [18] Ann Lee was the founder of the Shakers, a radical Protestant sect that opposed procreation and all sexual activity. The Shakers were more opposed to pregnancy than anything else. [19] [ better source needed ] Father Divine, founder of the International Peace Mission Movement, advocated religious abstinence from sex and marriage and taught that sexual objectification is a root cause of undesirable social and political conditions. [20]

James Baldwin in The Fire Next Time refers to the United States as an antisexual country dominated by a white culture that regards sensual or soulful behavior by Black Americans as suspect. This contributes to a crisis of Baldwin's Christian faith because it shows that the world does not accept him, and that Christianity has not made white people accepting. [21]

Non-religious

Philosopher Immanuel Kant viewed humans as being subject to the animalistic desires of self-preservation, species-preservation, and the preservation of enjoyment. He argued that humans have a duty to avoid maxims that harm or degrade themselves, including suicide, sexual degradation, and drunkenness. [22] :225 This led Kant to regard sexual intercourse as degrading because it "makes of the loved person an Object of appetite", [23] rather than focusing on their inherent worth as rational beings, which violates Kant's second formulation of the categorical imperative, a philosophical concept he created to judge the morality of actions. He admitted sex only within marriage, which he regarded as "a merely animal union". [24]

Feminist

Various feminist views on sexuality have been described as anti-sex or sex-negative. In particular, second-wave and radical feminist viewpoints and thinkers have been subject to this, including from other feminists. [25] [26] [27]

Prior to the second wave of feminism, which introduced such slogans as "The personal is political" in the 1960s, the subject of women's sexuality had rarely been addressed as a politicized subject, although the subjugation of women by aspects of male sexuality had been discussed. Major feminist organizations, such as the National Organization for Women (NOW) in the United States, primarily focused on male supremacy in the public sphere. It was not until the earliest radical feminist groups began to form in the late 1960s that feminist analysis of women's sexuality started to become widespread. [28]

According to radical feminist theory, sexuality is the primary sphere of patriarchy, with sexual activity, especially heterosexual sex, as the basis of women's oppression by men. Radical feminists oppose the sexual objectification of women, for their sexual and reproductive labor, and hold the view that in a male-dominated society, heterosexual practices involve an imbalance of power and serves to sexualize the oppression of women. [29] Ti-Grace Atkinson wrote of heterosexual sex as a social institution serving the needs of men, but not necessarily of women. This analysis lead some radical feminists to call for women to stop having sex with men altogether, with some advocating for celibacy and others advocating political lesbianism. [28] This led to the second wave polarizing around two camps in what would become known as the feminist sex wars. [30]

One radical feminist remains critical of women having sex with men. Radical feminist writer Julie Bindel describing female bisexuality as a "fashionable trend" pushing for sexual hedonism. She writes, "if bisexual women had an ounce of sexual politics, they would stop sleeping with men." [31]

Multiple authors have objected to radical feminists on this front. Margaret Hunt criticized Sheila Jeffreys for praising women involved in the 19th-century social purity movement, whose "concern with women's victimization" Jeffreys admired. [32]

Naomi Wolf identified a form of feminism she called victim feminism, which she described as "sexually judgmental, even antisexual". [33]

Criticism

Friedrich Nietzsche has many criticisms of Jesus and Christianity. In Human, All Too Human , and Twilight of the Idols for example, Nietzsche accuses the Church's and Jesus' teachings as being anti-natural in their treatment of passions, in particularly sexuality: "There [In the Sermon on the Mount] it is said, for example, with particular reference to sexuality: 'If thy eye offend thee, pluck it out.' Fortunately, no Christian acts in accordance with this precept... [34] the Christian who follows that advice and believes he has killed his sensuality is deceiving himself: it lives on in an uncanny vampire form and torments in repulsive disguises." [35]

Antisexualism drew sharp criticism from Bertrand Russell in his Marriage and Morals :

Westermarck gives many instances of what he calls 'the curious notion that there is something impure and sinful in ... sexual relations.' ... It should be said to begin with that it is useless to look to beliefs as the source of this kind of attitude. Beliefs of this sort must be in the first place inspired by a mood; it is true that when once they exist they may perpetuate the mood, or at any rate actions in accordance with the mood, but it is hardly likely that they will be the prime causes of an anti-sexual attitude. The two main causes of such an attitude are, I should say, jealousy and sexual fatigue.

Bertrand Russell, Marriage and Morals [36]

According to Bertrand Russell, an anti-sexual attitude must be regarded as purely superstitious and those who first inculcated antisexualism must have suffered from a diseased condition of body or mind, or both. [37]

Anaphrodisiacs

John Harvey Kellogg, the inventor of the "corn flakes" variety of breakfast cereal, was opposed to all forms of sexual activity, especially masturbation. [38] The Road to Wellville satirized his life and practices. [39] According to some sources, the early Christian theologian Origen castrated himself to avoid temptation and remain pure. [40] Female circumcision may have been developed to discourage women from having sex or, alternatively, of removing or diminishing temptations which might lead to infidelity.[ citation needed ]

Fictional

See also

Related Research Articles

Radical feminism is a perspective within feminism that calls for a radical re-ordering of society in which male supremacy is eliminated in all social and economic contexts, while recognizing that women's experiences are also affected by other social divisions such as in race, class, and sexual orientation. The ideology and movement emerged in the 1960s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sexual revolution</span> 20th-century Western social movement

The sexual revolution, also known as the sexual liberation, was a social movement that challenged traditional codes of behavior related to sexuality and interpersonal relationships throughout the developed Western world from the 1960s to the 1970s. Sexual liberation included increased acceptance of sex outside of traditional heterosexual, monogamous relationships. The normalization of contraception and the pill, public nudity, pornography, premarital sex, homosexuality, masturbation, alternative forms of sexuality, and the legalization of abortion all followed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sexual objectification</span> Treating a person primarily as a sexual object

Sexual objectification is the act of treating a person solely as an object of sexual desire. Objectification more broadly means treating a person as a commodity or an object without regard to their personality or dignity. Objectification is most commonly examined at the level of a society, but can also refer to the behavior of individuals and is a type of dehumanization.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Biphobia</span> Aversion to bisexual people

Biphobia is aversion toward bisexuality or people who are identified or perceived as being bisexual. Similarly to homophobia, it refers to hatred and prejudice specifically against those identified or perceived as being in the bisexual community. It can take the form of denial that bisexuality is a genuine sexual orientation, or of negative stereotypes about people who are bisexual. Other forms of biphobia include bisexual erasure.

The sex-positive movement is a social and philosophical movement that seeks to change cultural attitudes and norms around sexuality, promoting the recognition of sexuality as a natural and healthy part of the human experience and emphasizing the importance of personal sovereignty, safer sex practices, and consensual sex. It covers every aspect of sexual identity including gender expression, orientation, relationship to the body, relationship-style choice, and reproductive rights. Sex-positivity is "an attitude towards human sexuality that regards all consensual sexual activities as fundamentally healthy and pleasurable, encouraging sexual pleasure and experimentation." It challenges societal taboos and aims to promote healthy and consensual sexual activities. The sex-positive movement also advocates for comprehensive sex education and safe sex as part of its campaign. The movement generally makes no moral distinctions among types of sexual activities, regarding these choices as matters of personal preference.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Free love</span> Social movement that accepts all forms of love

Free love is a social movement that accepts all forms of love. The movement's initial goal was to separate the state from sexual and romantic matters such as marriage, birth control, and adultery. It stated that such issues were the concern of the people involved and no one else. The movement began during the 19th century and was advanced by hippies during the 1960s and early 70s.

Philosophy of sex is an aspect of applied philosophy involved with the study of sex and love. It includes both ethics of phenomena such as prostitution, rape, sexual harassment, sexual identity, the age of consent, homosexuality, and conceptual analysis of more universal questions such as "what is sex?" It also includes matters of sexuality and sexual identity and the ontological status of gender. Leading contemporary philosophers of sex include Alan Soble, Judith Butler, and Raja Halwani.

Sex-positive feminism, also known as pro-sex feminism, sex-radical feminism, or sexually liberal feminism, is a feminist movement centering on the idea that sexual freedom is an essential component of women's freedom. They oppose legal or social efforts to control sexual activities between consenting adults, whether they are initiated by the government, other feminists, opponents of feminism, or any other institution. They embrace sexual minority groups, endorsing the value of coalition-building with marginalized groups. Sex-positive feminism is connected with the sex-positive movement. Sex-positive feminism brings together anti-censorship activists, LGBT activists, feminist scholars, producers of pornography and erotica, among others. Sex-positive feminists believe that prostitution can be a positive experience if workers are treated with respect, and agree that sex work should not be criminalized.

Sexual ethics is a branch of philosophy that considers the ethics or morality or otherwise in sexual behavior. Sexual ethics seeks to understand, evaluate and critique interpersonal relationships and sexual activities from a social, cultural, and philosophical perspective. Some people consider aspects of human sexuality, such as gender identification and sexual orientation, as well as consent, sexual relations and procreation, as giving rise to issues of sexual ethics.

Political lesbianism is a phenomenon within feminism, primarily second-wave feminism and radical feminism; it includes, but is not limited to, lesbian separatism. Political lesbianism asserts that sexual orientation is a political and feminist choice, and advocates lesbianism as a positive alternative to heterosexuality for women as part of the struggle against sexism.

Sheila Jeffreys is a former professor of political science at the University of Melbourne, born in England. A lesbian feminist scholar, she analyses the history and politics of human sexuality.

The feminist sex wars, also known as the lesbian sex wars, sex wars or porn wars, are terms used to refer to collective debates amongst feminists regarding a number of issues broadly relating to sexuality and sexual activity. Differences of opinion on matters of sexuality deeply polarized the feminist movement, particularly leading feminist thinkers, in the late 1970s and early 1980s and continue to influence debate amongst feminists to this day.

Feminist sexology is an offshoot of traditional studies of sexology that focuses on the intersectionality of sex and gender in relation to the sexual lives of women. Sexology has a basis in psychoanalysis, specifically Freudian theory, which played a big role in early sexology. This reactionary field of feminist sexology seeks to be inclusive of experiences of sexuality and break down the problematic ideas that have been expressed by sexology in the past. Feminist sexology shares many principles with the overarching field of sexology; in particular, it does not try to prescribe a certain path or "normality" for women's sexuality, but only observe and note the different and varied ways in which women express their sexuality. It is a young field, but one that is growing rapidly.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sexual repression</span> Psychological state

Sexual repression is a state in which a person is prevented from expressing their own sexuality or sexual orientation. Sexual repression can be caused by an emotional conflict, in which a person feels guilt, shame, or distress regarding their natural sexual impulses. These feelings of emotional distress can be exasterbated by outside factors, such as family, religion, and peer pressure. Sexual repression is often synonymous with internalized homophobia, in which a gay, lesbian, or bisexual person feels the need to suppress their own homosexual impulses and conform to heterosexual norms. Sexual repression can also be caused by external oppression, in which the laws of a society prevent someone from expressing their sexuality freely.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human female sexuality</span> Physiology, identity and behavior

Human female sexuality encompasses a broad range of behaviors and processes, including female sexual identity and sexual behavior, the physiological, psychological, social, cultural, political, and spiritual or religious aspects of sexual activity. Various aspects and dimensions of female sexuality, as a part of human sexuality, have also been addressed by principles of ethics, morality, and theology. In almost any historical era and culture, the arts, including literary and visual arts, as well as popular culture, present a substantial portion of a given society's views on human sexuality, which includes both implicit (covert) and explicit (overt) aspects and manifestations of feminine sexuality and behavior.

Feminist views on pornography range from total condemnation of the medium as an inherent form of violence against women to an embracing of some forms as a medium of feminist expression. This debate reflects larger concerns surrounding feminist views on sexuality, and is closely related to those on prostitution, BDSM, and other issues. Pornography has been one of the most divisive issues in feminism, particularly in Anglophone (English-speaking) countries. This division was exemplified in the feminist sex wars of the 1980s, which pitted anti-pornography activists against pro-pornography ones.

Major anarchist thinkers, past and present, have generally supported women's equality. Free love advocates sometimes traced their roots back to Josiah Warren and to experimental communities, viewing sexual freedom as an expression of an individual's self-ownership. Free love particularly stressed women's rights. In New York's Greenwich Village, "bohemian" feminists and socialists advocated self-realisation and pleasure for both men and women. In Europe and North America, the free love movement combined ideas revived from utopian socialism with anarchism and feminism to attack the "hypocritical" sexual morality of the Victorian era.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Compulsory heterosexuality</span> Social vision of heterosexuality as the natural inclination or obligation

Compulsory heterosexuality, often shortened to comphet, is the theory that heterosexuality is assumed and enforced upon people by a patriarchal and heteronormative society. The term was popularized by Adrienne Rich in her 1980 essay titled "Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence". According to Rich, social science and literature perpetuate the societal belief that women in every culture are believed to have an innate preference for romantic and sexual relationships with men. She argues that women's sexuality towards men is not always natural but is societally ingrained and scripted into women. Comphet creates the belief that society is overwhelmingly heterosexual and delegitimizes queer identities. As a result, it perpetuates homophobia and legal inequity for the LGBTQ+ community.

Feminist views on sexuality widely vary. Many feminists, particularly radical feminists, are highly critical of what they see as sexual objectification and sexual exploitation in the media and society. Radical feminists are often opposed to the sex industry, including opposition to prostitution and pornography. Other feminists define themselves as sex-positive feminists and believe that a wide variety of expressions of female sexuality can be empowering to women when they are freely chosen. Some feminists support efforts to reform the sex industry to become less sexist, such as the feminist pornography movement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Male gaze</span> Concept in feminist theory

In feminist theory, the male gaze is the act of depicting women and the world in the visual arts and in literature from a masculine, heterosexual perspective that presents and represents women as sexual objects for the pleasure of the heterosexual male viewer. In the visual and aesthetic presentations of narrative cinema, the male gaze has three perspectives: that of the man behind the camera, that of the male characters within the film's cinematic representations; and that of the spectator gazing at the image.

References

  1. John Ince (2005), The politics of lust, Prometheus Books, p. 11, ISBN   978-1-59102-278-7, consists of any negative response directed at sex organs or harmless sex expression
  2. Schmit, Timaree (16 May 2017). "Philly collective talks sex-positive resistance in American politics". Archived from the original on 2017-06-06.
  3. Mhaoileoin, Niamh Ní (2 August 2016). "The HIV drug dispute highlights the danger of the conservative case for gay rights". New Statesman. Archived from the original on 20 October 2021. Retrieved 7 February 2024.
  4. Rubin, Gayle. "Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality." Social Perspectives in Lesbian and Gay Studies; A Reader (1984): 100-133.
  5. Berer, Marge (2004). "Sexuality, Rights and Social Justice". Reproductive Health Matters. 12 (23): 6–11. doi:10.1016/S0968-8080(04)23130-5. ISSN   0968-8080.
  6. Dillon, M. C. "Sex objects and sexual objectification: Erotic versus pornographic depiction." Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 29.1 (1998): 92-115.
  7. Michelson, Noah (29 November 2017). "Another GOP Lawmaker Got Caught In A Sex Scandal. Here's Why You Should Defend Him". HuffPost UK. Archived from the original on 29 April 2023. Retrieved 7 February 2024.
  8. Shrage, Laurie. "Exposing the fallacies of anti-porn feminism." Feminist Theory 6.1 (2005): 45-65.
  9. "Definition of "antisexuality"". Collins English Dictionary. Archived from the original on 2012-10-29.
  10. "Definition of ANTISEX". Merriam-Webster. Archived from the original on 2013-01-31.
  11. Gescinska, Alicja A. (2022). "Sex in transition: anti-sexuality and the church in post-communist Poland" (PDF). In Clarke, Gemma; McQueen, Fiona; Pnacekova, Michaela; Sahli, Sabrina (eds.). Examining aspects of sexualities and the self (Conference). Critical Issues. Vol. 121. Oxford, UK: Inter-Disciplinary Press. pp. 87–94. hdl:1854/LU-924760. ISBN   978-1-84888-020-7. 924760. Retrieved March 12, 2013.[ permanent dead link ] 6th Global Conference : Sexualities : Bodies, Desires, Practices.
  12. Kon, Igor S. "Sexual culture and politics in contemporary Russia". Sexual counter-revolution in Russia. Russia: Fatekh Vergasov's electronic library. Archived from the original on 2012-01-13. Retrieved 2013-03-12. The current anti-sexual crusade is only the top of the iceberg. Under the guise of a moral renaissance, Russian Orthodoxy and its allies are trying to restore censorship and administrative control over private life.
  13. Houdini, Merlin X., IV (1974). "Of sex and fear". Word Ways. Vol. 7, no. 2. pp. 121–124. ISSN   0043-7980.{{cite magazine}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  14. Sunshine, Glenn S. (2009). Why You Think the Way You Do: The Story of Western Worldviews from Rome to Home. Zondervan. p. 47. ISBN   9780310292302. Archived from the original on 2014-01-05.
  15. See Book of Thomas the Contender, Acts of Thomas; also Spiritual marriage
  16. Bullough, V.L.; Bullough, B. (2019). Sin, Sickness and Sanity: A History of Sexual Attitudes. Routledge Library Editions: History of Sexuality. Taylor & Francis. p. 31. ISBN   978-0-429-61522-1 . Retrieved 2023-06-18.
  17. Friedman, David M. (2008). A Mind of Its Own: A Cultural History of the Penis. Simon & Schuster. pp. 36–37. ISBN   9781439136089. Archived from the original on 2014-01-05.
  18. Tanner, Beccy (2013-02-11). "Boston Corbett moved to Kansas after John Wilkes Booth shooting". The Wichita Eagle . Archived from the original on 2013-10-29.
  19. Gopnik, Adam (2006-02-13). "Shining Tree of Life". The New Yorker . Archived from the original on 2013-12-05.
  20. Watts, Jill (1992). God, Harlem U.S.A.: The Father Divine Story . University of California Press. p.  66. ISBN   9780520916692. All disciples subscribed to Father Divine's teaching that sex was a sin that drained the body of "spiritual energy", making the individual vulnerable to disease and death. Even followers who lived outside 72 Macon Street practiced celibacy.
  21. Baldwin, James (November 9, 1962). "Letter from a Region in My Mind". The New Yorker .
  22. Denis, Lara (April 1999). "Kant on the Wrongness of "Unnatural" Sex". History of Philosophy Quarterly. University of Illinois Press. 16 (2): 225–248.
  23. Kant, Immanuel. Lectures on Ethics, p. 163
  24. Wood, Allen (1999). Kant's Ethical Thought. Cambridge University Press. p. 2. ISBN   978-0521648363.
  25. Pyne, Elizabeth (2018-10-02). "Jessica Joy Cameron, Reconsidering Radical Feminism: Affect and the Politics of Heterosexuality". Studies in Gender and Sexuality. 19 (4): 309–311. doi:10.1080/15240657.2018.1531541. ISSN   1524-0657. S2CID   149988775.
  26. Janus, Kathleen Kelly (2013). "Finding common feminist ground: The role of the next generation in shaping feminist legal theory". Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy. 20 (2): 255–286.
  27. Tyler, Meagan (2018-04-10). "Can we eroticise equality? On the politics of sexual desire". ABC Religion & Ethics. Retrieved 2022-01-16.
  28. 1 2 Shulman, Alix Kates (1980). "Sex and Power: Sexual Bases of Radical Feminism". Signs. 5 (4): 590–604. doi:10.1086/493754. ISSN   0097-9740. JSTOR   3173832. S2CID   143235534.
  29. Collins, Barbara G. (1990). "Pornography and Social Policy: Three Feminist Approaches". Affilia. 5 (4): 8–26. doi:10.1177/088610999000500402. ISSN   0886-1099. S2CID   144561715.
  30. Snyder-Hall, R. Claire (March 2010). "Third-Wave Feminism and the Defense of "Choice"". Perspectives on Politics. 8 (1): 255–261. doi:10.1017/S1537592709992842. ISSN   1537-5927. S2CID   145133253.
  31. Bindel, Julie (12 June 2012). "Where's The Politics In Sex?". HuffPost. Retrieved 7 February 2024.
  32. Hunt, Margaret (1990). "The De-Eroticization of Women's Liberation: Social Purity Movements and the Revolutionary Feminism of Sheila Jeffreys". Feminist Review. 34 (1): 23–46. doi:10.1057/fr.1990.7. ISSN   0141-7789. S2CID   143771593.
  33. Wolf, Naomi (1994). Fire with fire : the new female power and how to use it (1st Vintage ed. Sept. 1994 ed.). Toronto: Vintage. ISBN   0-394-22386-1. OCLC   30666347.
  34. Friedrich Nietzsche, 1895, Twilight of the Idols, Morality as Anti-nature, 1.
  35. Friedrich Nietzsche, 1878, Human all too Human: A Book for Free Spirits, The Wanderer and His Shado, aphorism 83.
  36. Russell, Bertrand (1930). "Phallic worship, asceticism and sin". Marriage And Morals. London: George Allen & Unwin. pp. 31–39.
  37. Russell, Bertrand (1930). "Christian ethics". Marriage And Morals. London: George Allen & Unwin. pp. 40–53.
  38. Taormino, Tristan (2004-05-11). "Come for a Cause". The Village Voice . Archived from the original on 2010-09-09.
  39. Hicks, Chris (1994-11-01). "Film review: Road to Wellville, The". Deseret News . Archived from the original on 2015-06-06.
  40. Rothwell, Nicholas (2008-08-23). "The Way of All Flesh". The Australian . Archived from the original on 2014-12-16.
  41. O'Neill, Brendan (2009-05-17). "Inalienable Right to 'Excessively Noisy Sex'". Toronto Star . Archived from the original on 2016-03-04.