Bishops' Wars

Last updated

Bishops' Wars
Part of the Wars of the Three Kingdoms
The Signing of the National Covenant in Greyfriars Kirkyard, Edinburgh.jpg
Signing of the National Covenant in Greyfriars Kirkyard, Edinburgh
Date1639–1640
Location
Scotland, Northern England
Result Covenanter victory
Belligerents
Flag of England.svg England Scottish Covenanter Flag.svg Covenanters
Commanders and leaders
Strength
20,000–25,000 20,000
Casualties and losses
300–400 300–600

The Bishops' Wars [lower-alpha 2] were two distinct but related conflicts in 1639 and 1640 fought between Scotland and England with minor factional skirmishing within Scotland. These were the first of what became the 1639 to 1653 Wars of the Three Kingdoms, which also included the First and Second English Civil Wars, and the 1650 to 1652 Anglo-Scottish War.

Contents

The conflicts originated in who held supreme authority over the Church of Scotland. In 1637, Charles I, who was king of both Scotland and England, attempted to impose changes in religious practice on the Scottish church. These reforms were strongly opposed by many Scots who, in 1638, expressed their strong political opposition by signing the National Covenant. Supporters of this movement became known as Covenanters. In December 1638, the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland met in Glasgow and voted to expel bishops, who were generally seen as instruments of royal control. This turned differences over religious practice into a struggle for political supremacy.

Support for the National Covenant was widespread across Scotland. Covenanters gained control of the government and mobilised forces to oppose any attempt by the king, or by his Royalist supporters within Scotland, to restore his authority. In early 1639, the north-east of Scotland saw skirmishing between Royalists and Covenanters and by June, English and Scottish armies had mustered on the border near Berwick. However, both armies withdrew after a negotiated truce, ending the confrontation which would later be known as the First Bishops' War. The terms of the truce included calling of a new General Assembly and Scottish Parliament which met in August to resolve matters still in dispute. Rather, the decisions taken at Glasgow the prior year, were re-affirmed, continuing the political struggle. Determined to reverse these changes, Charles mobilised another army but during the subsequent Second Bishops' War in 1640, the Scots invaded, defeated their English opponents and proceeded to occupy parts of northern England.

An interim truce followed where, pending negotiation of a final settlement, the king agreed to pay for the Scots occupation and this financial necessity compelled him to call a new English parliament to ratify the treaty. On 10 August 1641. the king signed the Treaty of London formally ending the Bishops' Wars. The new English parliament which had assembled was strongly opposed to the king and his government and antagonism between them escalated to armed conflict in 1642: the start of the English Civil War.

Background

Riots over the Prayer book, set off by Jenny Geddes Riot against Anglican prayer book 1637.jpg
Riots over the Prayer book, set off by Jenny Geddes

The Reformation in Scotland created a Church of Scotland, informally referred to as the Kirk , that was Presbyterian in structure, and Calvinist in doctrine. While the terms Presbyterian and Episcopalian now imply differences in both structure and doctrine, this was not the case in the 17th century. Despite shared Protestant beliefs, Episcopalian churches were governed by bishops, usually appointed by the monarch, Presbyterian by presbyters, elected by ministers and elders. [2] This meant arguments over bishops were as much about politics and royal authority as religious practice. [3]

The vast majority of Scots, whether Covenanter or Royalist believed a "well-ordered" monarchy was divinely mandated; they disagreed on what "well-ordered" meant, and who held ultimate authority in clerical affairs. In general, Royalists viewed the monarch as head of both church and state, while Covenanters held this applied only to secular matters, and "Chryst Jesus ... was King of the Kirk". [4] However, there were many other factors, including nationalist allegiance to the Kirk, and individual motives were very complex; Montrose was a Covenanter in 1639 and 1640 before becoming a Royalist, and switching sides was common throughout the period. [5]

Covenanter political leader, the Marquess of Argyll The Marquess of Argyll.jpg
Covenanter political leader, the Marquess of Argyll

When James VI and I succeeded as king of England in 1603, he viewed a unified Church of Scotland and England as the first step in creating a centralised, Unionist state. [6] This policy was adopted by his son, Charles I, but the two were very different in doctrine; many in both Scotland and England considered Charles' reforms to the Church of England as essentially Catholic. [7]

This mattered because fear of popery remained widespread, despite the fact it was restricted to parts of the Scottish aristocracy and the remote Highlands. [8] Scots volunteers and mercenaries fought on the Protestant side in the Thirty Years' War, while Scotland had close economic and cultural links with the Dutch Republic, then fighting for independence from Catholic Spain. In addition, many Scots had been educated in French Huguenot universities, the majority of which were suppressed by Louis XIII in the 1620s. [9]

A general perception Protestant Europe was under attack meant increased sensitivity to changes in church practice; in 1636, a new Book of Canons replaced John Knox's Book of Discipline and excommunicated anyone who denied the King's supremacy in church matters. [10] When followed in 1637 by a new Book of Common Prayer, the result was anger and widespread rioting, said to have been set off with the throwing of a stool by Jenny Geddes during a service in St. Giles Cathedral. [11] Historians like Mark Kishlansky now argue her action was not spontaneous, but one in a series of planned and co-ordinated opposition to the Prayer book, the origin of which was as much political as religious. [12] These culminated in February 1638, when delegates from across Scotland agreed a National Covenant, pledging resistance to liturgical "innovations". [13]

The Marquess of Argyll and six other members of the Scottish Privy Council backed the Covenant. [14] Charles agreed to defer discussion of the new canons to the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland, but at the same time told his supporters that he had no intention of making concessions. As a consequence, when the Assembly gathered in Glasgow in December it rejected the changes, expelled bishops from the Kirk, and affirmed its right to meet annually, not just when granted permission. The Marquis of Hamilton, Charles' chief advisor on Scottish affairs, now advised him there was no alternative to war. [15]

First Bishops' War

Scotland relief location map.jpg
Red pog.svg
Aberdeen
Red pog.svg
Berwick
Red pog.svg
Dumbarton
Red pog.svg
Edinburgh
Red pog.svg
Carrickfergus
Red pog.svg
Duns
Red pog.svg
Turriff
Key locations of The First Bishops' War, 1639

Charles decided to re-assert his authority by force, using his own financial resources and thus avoiding the need to recall Parliament to obtain tax funding. An English army of 20,000 would advance on Edinburgh from the south, while an amphibious force of 5,000 under the Marquis of Hamilton landed on the east coast, where it would link up with Royalist troops led by the Marquess of Huntly. Lastly, an Irish army under the Earl of Antrim would invade western Scotland from Carrickfergus, where he would join forces with the MacDonalds and other Royalist clans. [16]

By the end of March 1639, this complex plan had begun to unravel: the Covenanters had secured likely west coast landing places, notably Dumbarton, [17] preventing any prospect of an Irish landing. Likewise, Hamilton's amphibious force was unable to disembark after finding the Forth estuary stoutly defended. [18] [19]

Struggle for the North East

Support for the Covenant was widespread in Scottish society, but less so in north-east Scotland. Aberdeenshire and Banff in particular would be the heartland of Royalist and Episcopalian resistance for the next 60 years. [20] Recognising this, the Covenanter government ordered Montrose to occupy Aberdeen which fell bloodlessly on 30 March. In the following weeks, the town changed hands several times, and on 13 May, the Royalists won a small victory at the so-called Trot of Turriff where one Royalist soldier became the first casualty of the Wars of the Three Kingdoms. Buoyed by this victory, Royalists under Viscount Aboyne were able to retake Aberdeen then lead a force south where they lost the ensuing Battle of the Brig of Dee to Covenanters under Montrose on 19 June. This was the only significant engagement of the First Bishops' War. [21] [19]

Reception of the war

The First Bishops' War was not widely popular in England as many of the commoners were not appeased with Charles' church reforms either. This religious conflict ended up being labelled as "King Charles's northern follies" with anxiety and disenchantment spreading through various English media and genres. [22] The declaration of war also meant that funding was necessary, but the methods used created additional internal conflict. Towns and smaller settlements faced increased taxation, impressments, and billeting which were detrimental to the civilian population. Anti-war sentiment was skyrocketing as the officers of the English army were assaulted by their own men. [23] On the other side of the war, Covenanter propaganda by the Scottish were highly effective due to the internal turmoil of England. They were able to gain the support of the English public who wanted to deescalate the unnecessary conflict. [24]

Standoff at the border

In May, an English army of around 15,000 assembled at the border town of Berwick-upon-Tweed. The vast majority were untrained conscripts from the northern trained bands or militia, many armed only with bows and arrows. Charles unsuccessfully tried to compensate for this by recruiting foreign mercenaries from the Spanish Netherlands, exposing him to accusations of using foreign Catholics against his own subjects. [16] Though both sides included large numbers of professional soldiers who had served in the European wars, the senior English commands went to Charles' favourites, who were largely inexperienced. [25]

Alexander Leslie; Covenanter military commander Alexleslie.jpg
Alexander Leslie; Covenanter military commander

The English faced a Scottish force of 16,500 led by the experienced veteran Alexander Leslie, who had served with the Swedes in the Thirty Years' War. On 14 May, Charles issued a proclamation that the Scottish army would be destroyed if it moved to within ten miles of the border. Thus, on 3 June, when he received word that the Scots had advanced to Kelso, well within the limit, he sent a small force to investigate. Encountering Scottish units there, the English suspected they were outnumbered and retreated back across the border without a shot being fired. The Scots now felt confident to ignore the 10 mile declaration and on 5 June advanced as far as to Duns. [26] [19] [27]

Negotiations and truce

Neither side was anxious to fight and opened negotiations on 11 June, concluding with the signing of the Pacification of Berwick on 19 June. This referred all disputed questions either to the General Assembly, or Parliament of Scotland. However, both sides viewed this as a truce, and continued preparations for another military confrontation. [28]

Interlude

Thomas Wentworth, 1st Earl of Strafford, and organiser of the King's forces for the Second War Thomas Wentworth, 1st Earl of Strafford by Sir Anthony Van Dyck (2).jpg
Thomas Wentworth, 1st Earl of Strafford, and organiser of the King's forces for the Second War

The Kirk's General Assembly met again in August 1639 and confirmed the decisions taken at Glasgow, which were then ratified by the Scottish Parliament. When Charles' representative, Lord Traquair, tried to suspend it, his action was declared illegal and Parliament continued to sit. A series of acts were passed which amounted to a constitutional revolution, including Tri-annual Parliaments, and making the Covenant compulsory for all holders of public office. [16]

His advisors convinced Charles the only way to finance a second war was to recall the English Parliament, and in December 1639, he issued writs for the first time since 1629. Thomas Wentworth, 1st Earl of Strafford, his most capable advisor and Lord Deputy of Ireland also asked the Parliament of Ireland for funds; in March, they approved an army of 9,000 to suppress the Covenanters, despite violent opposition from their co-religionists in Ulster. This is an example of how the Bishops Wars destabilised all three kingdoms. [29]

Charles hoped this would provide an example for the Short Parliament, which assembled in April; however, led by John Pym, Parliament demanded he address grievances like ship money before they would approve subsidies. After three weeks of stalemate. Charles dissolved Parliament; he would have to rely on his own resources to fund the war. Meanwhile, in January 1640 the Covenanter leaders mustered their regiments, and to secure their rear, occupied Aberdeen, centre of the Royalist north-east. [30]

Second Bishops' War

North East England districts 2011 map.svg
Red pog.svg
Newburn
Red pog.svg
Berwick
Red pog.svg
Durham
Red pog.svg
Newcastle
The Newburn campaign, 1640

In June, the Scottish Parliament met in Edinburgh, and granted Argyll a commission of 'fire and sword' against the Royalist areas of Lochaber, Badenoch and Rannoch in the Scottish Highlands. A force of 5,000 conducted this campaign with great brutality, burning and looting across a large area, one of the most infamous acts being the destruction of Airlie Castle in Angus. As they had done in the First Bishops' War, the Covenanter forces also seized Dumbarton Castle, preventing Strafford's Irish army from landing in Scotland and so enabling them to focus on the threatened English invasion. [31]

The Scottish army was again led by Leslie and consisted of around 20,000 well-equipped men, and possessed vastly superior artillery compared to its opponents. The English troops consisted largely of militia from Southern England, poorly-equipped, unpaid, and unenthusiastic about the war. On the march north, lack of supplies meant they looted the areas they passed through, creating widespread disorder; several units murdered officers suspected of being Catholics, then deserted. [32]

Lord Conway, the English commander in the north, focused on reinforcing Berwick-upon-Tweed, the usual starting point for invading England. On 17 August, cavalry units under Montrose crossed the River Tweed, followed by the rest of Leslie's army. The Scots bypassed the town, and headed for Newcastle-upon-Tyne, centre of the coal trade with London, and a valuable bargaining point. [33]

On 28 August, the Scots forced a passage over the River Tyne at the Battle of Newburn; they still had to take Newcastle, but to Leslie's surprise, when they arrived on 30 August, Conway had withdrawn to Durham. One suggestion is he did not trust his ill-disciplined and mutinous troops, but morale in the rest of the army now collapsed, forcing Charles to make peace. [34] The only other significant action of the war was the siege of Edinburgh Castle, held by the Royalist commander Sir Patrick Ruthven, who had previously served with Leslie in the Swedish army. Blockaded since the end of May, starvation forced him to surrender in September. [35]

Aftermath

Under the truce negotiated in October 1640, the Scots were paid £850 per day and allowed to occupy Northumberland and County Durham until peace terms had been finalised. Many believed this arrangement was secretly agreed between the Parliamentary opposition and the Scots, since it allowed them to maintain pressure on London by controlling the export of coal from Newcastle, while only Parliament could levy the taxes needed to pay the occupation costs. The so-called Long Parliament that assembled in November 1640 asserted its power by executing Strafford in May 1641. By August, the Treaty of London was signed and the Scottish army finally evacuated Northern England. [36]

John Pym, leader of the English Parliamentary opposition; defeat forced Charles to recall Parliament in November 1640 John Pym.jpg
John Pym, leader of the English Parliamentary opposition; defeat forced Charles to recall Parliament in November 1640

While defeat forced Charles to call a Parliament he could not get rid of, the Irish Rebellion of 1641 was arguably more significant in the struggle that led to war in August 1642. Both he and Parliament agreed on the need to suppress the revolt but neither trusted the other with control of the army raised to do so, and it was this tension that was the proximate cause of the First English Civil War. [37] Victory confirmed Covenanter control of government and the Kirk, and Scottish policy now focused on securing these achievements. The 1643 Solemn League and Covenant was driven by concern over the implications for Scotland if Parliament were defeated; like Charles, the Covenanters sought political power through the creation of a unified church of Scotland and England, only one that was Presbyterian, rather than Episcopalian. [38]

However, success in the Bishops Wars meant they overestimated their military capacity and ability to enforce this objective. [39] Unlike Scotland, Presbyterians were a minority within the Church of England, while religious Independents opposed any state church, let alone one dictated by the Scots. One of their most prominent opponents was Oliver Cromwell, who claimed he would fight rather than agree to such an outcome. [40] Many of the political radicals known as the Levellers, and much of the New Model Army, belonged to Independent congregations; by 1646, the Scots and their English allies viewed them as a greater threat than Charles. Defeat in the 1648 Second English Civil War resulted in his execution, while a failed invasion of England intended to restore his son in the Anglo-Scottish war (1650–1652) was followed by Scotland's incorporation into the Commonwealth, a union made on English terms. [41]

Footnotes

  1. 1 2 3 Leslie was ennobled as 1st Earl of Leven and Hamilton promoted to a Duke after hostilities had ended. Strafford was made an Earl between the 1st and 2nd Bishops' Wars
  2. Scottish Gaelic: Cogaidhean nan Easbaigean) [1]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Newburn</span> Battle on 28 August 1640, during the Second Bishops War

The Battle of Newburn, also known as the Battle of Newburn Ford, took place on 28 August 1640, during the Second Bishops' War. It was fought at Newburn, just outside Newcastle, where a ford crossed the River Tyne. A Scottish Covenanter army of 20,000 under Alexander Leslie defeated an English force of 5,000, led by Lord Conway.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ralph Hopton, 1st Baron Hopton</span> English politician and military officer

Ralph Hopton, 1st Baron Hopton was an English politician, military officer and peer. During the First English Civil War, he served as Royalist commander in the West Country, and was made Baron Hopton of Stratton in 1643.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wars of the Three Kingdoms</span> British civil wars, 1639–1653

The Wars of the Three Kingdoms, sometimes known as the British Civil Wars, were a series of intertwined conflicts fought between 1639 and 1653 in the kingdoms of England, Scotland and Ireland, then separate entities united in a personal union under Charles I. They include the 1639 to 1640 Bishops' Wars, the First and Second English Civil Wars, the Irish Confederate Wars, the Cromwellian conquest of Ireland and the Anglo-Scottish War of 1650–1652. They resulted in victory for the Parliamentarian army, the execution of Charles I, the abolition of monarchy, and founding of the Commonwealth of England, a unitary state which controlled the British Isles until the Stuart Restoration in 1660.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Treaty of Ripon</span> 1640 treaty between Charles I and the Scottish Covenanters

The Treaty of Ripon was an agreement signed by Charles I, King of England, Scotland, and Ireland, and the Scottish Covenanters on 28 October 1640, in the aftermath of the Second Bishops' War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Second English Civil War</span> Part of Wars of the Three Kingdoms (1648)

The Second English Civil War took place between February and August 1648 in England and Wales. It forms part of the series of conflicts known collectively as the 1639–1653 Wars of the Three Kingdoms, which include the 1641–1653 Irish Confederate Wars, the 1639–1640 Bishops' Wars, and the 1649–1653 Cromwellian conquest of Ireland.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">First English Civil War</span> Part of the Wars of the Three Kingdoms (1642–1646)

The First English Civil War took place in England and Wales from 1642 to 1646, and forms part of the 1639 to 1653 Wars of the Three Kingdoms. An estimated 15% to 20% of adult males in England and Wales served in the military at some point between 1639 and 1653, while around 4% of the total population died from war-related causes. These figures illustrate the widespread impact of the conflict on society, and the bitterness it engendered as a result.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Scotland in the Wars of the Three Kingdoms</span> Role of Scotland during the Wars of the Three Kingdoms (1639–1653)

Between 1639 and 1652, Scotland was involved in the Wars of the Three Kingdoms, a series of wars starting with the Bishops' Wars, the Irish Rebellion of 1641, the English Civil War, the Irish Confederate Wars, and finally the subjugation of Ireland and Scotland by the English Roundhead New Model Army.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Urry (soldier)</span> Scottish soldier

Sir John Urry, also known as Hurry, was a Scottish professional soldier who at various times during the Wars of the Three Kingdoms fought for Scots Covenanters, Engagers and Royalists, as well as both English Parliamentarians and Royalists. Captured at Carbisdale in April 1650, he was executed in Edinburgh on 29 May 1650.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Engagers</span> Political party in Scotland

The Engagers were a faction of the Scottish Covenanters, who made "The Engagement" with King Charles I in December 1647 while he was imprisoned in Carisbrooke Castle by the English Parliamentarians after his defeat in the First Civil War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Treaty of Breda (1650)</span> 1650 treaty between Charles II and Scottish Covenanters

The Treaty of Breda (1650) was signed on 1 May 1650 between Charles II, exiled king of England, Scotland and Ireland, and the Scottish Covenanter government. Under its terms, they agreed to install Charles II as King of Scotland and Britain, while Charles undertook to establish a Presbyterian Church of England, and guarantee the rights of the Church of Scotland.

The Treaty of Berwick was an agreement between the Kingdom of England and the Kingdom of Scotland, signed on 18 June 1639, which ended the First Bishops' War.

The Incident was a Royalist plot to kidnap a group of Scottish nobles. The Incident took place in October 1641 during the Wars of the Three Kingdoms, and the plot's targets were all prominent members of the Presbyterian Covenanter faction who opposed Charles I's attempts to control the Scottish Church.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Preston (1648)</span> Battle of the Second English Civil War

The Battle of Preston, fought largely at Walton-le-Dale near Preston in Lancashire, resulted in a victory for the New Model Army under the command of Oliver Cromwell over the Royalists and Scots Engagers commanded by the Duke of Hamilton. The Parliamentarian victory presaged the end of the Second English Civil War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Covenanters</span> 17th-century Scottish Presbyterians

Covenanters were members of a 17th-century Scottish religious and political movement, who supported a Presbyterian Church of Scotland and the primacy of its leaders in religious affairs. The name is derived from covenant, a biblical term for a bond or agreement with God.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Scottish religion in the seventeenth century</span> Religious organisation and belief in the Kingdom of Scotland in the 17th century

Scottish religion in the seventeenth century includes all forms of religious organisation and belief in the Kingdom of Scotland in the seventeenth century. The 16th century Reformation created a Church of Scotland, popularly known as the kirk, predominantly Calvinist in doctrine and Presbyterian in structure, to which James VI added a layer of bishops in 1584.

This is a timeline of events leading up to, culminating in, and resulting from the Wars of the Three Kingdoms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of the Brig of Dee</span> 1639 battle in the First Bishops War

The Battle of the Brig of Dee took place on 18–19 June 1639 at the Bridge of Dee in Scotland, and was the only serious military action of the First Bishops' War. It featured a Royalist force under James Gordon, 2nd Viscount Aboyne, opposed by Covenanters led by James Graham, 5th Earl of Montrose, and resulted in a Covenanter victory.

The Treaty of London of 1641 was an agreement between the Kingdom of England and the Kingdom of Scotland which formally ended the 1639 to 1640 Bishops' Wars.

The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to the wars of the Three Kingdoms:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Covenant</span> 1638 opposition to Scottish Church reform

The National Covenant was an agreement signed by many people of Scotland during 1638, opposing the proposed reforms of the Church of Scotland by King Charles I. The king's efforts to impose changes on the church in the 1630s caused widespread protests across Scotland, leading to the organisation of committees to coordinate opposition to the king. Facing royal opposition, its leaders arranged the creation of the National Covenant to bolster the movement by tapping into patriotic fervour. It became widely adopted throughout most of Scotland with supporters henceforth known as Covenanters.

References

  1. "Cogadh Sìobhalta Shasainn - Ath-shealladh". gd.eferrit.com.
  2. Bannerman 1868b, pp260- 295.
  3. Harris 2014, pp. 39–41.
  4. Melville 2015, p. 370.
  5. Harris 2014, pp. 53–54.
  6. Stephen 2010, pp. 55–58.
  7. McDonald 1998, pp. 75–76.
  8. Fissel 1994, pp. 269, 278.
  9. Wilson 2012, pp. 787–778.
  10. Stevenson 2003, pp. 45–46.
  11. Mackie, Lenman & Parker 1986, p. 203.
  12. Kishlansky 2005, pp. 43–50.
  13. Mackie, Lenman & Parker 1986, p. 204.
  14. Mackie, Lenman & Parker 1986, pp. 205–206.
  15. Harris 2014, p. 372.
  16. 1 2 3 Harris 2014, p. 374.
  17. Royle 2006, pp. 85.
  18. Royle 2006, pp. 89–90.
  19. 1 2 3 Thomson 2018, pp. 74–79.
  20. Plant.
  21. Royle 2006, pp. 89–94.
  22. Cressy, David (2015). "The Blindness of Charles I". Huntington Library Quarterly. 78 (4): 637–656. doi:10.1353/hlq.2015.0031. ISSN   1544-399X.
  23. "127 Cooper v Billops | British History Online". www.british-history.ac.uk. Retrieved 4 April 2023.
  24. Waureghen, Sarah (2009). "Covenanter Propaganda and Conceptualizations of the Public during the Bishops Wars, 1638-1640". The Historical Journal. 52 (1): 63–86. ISSN   0018-246X.
  25. Gericke 2001, pp. 56–57.
  26. Royle 2006, p. 94.
  27. Woolrych, Austin (2009). Britain in revolution: 1625 - 1660 (Reprint ed.). Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. ISBN   978-0-19-927268-6.
  28. Pearce 2015, pp. 145–147.
  29. Harris 2014, p. 380.
  30. Royle 2006, pp. 107–108.
  31. Royle 2006, p. 110.
  32. Royle 2006, p. 109.
  33. Royle 2006, p. 111.
  34. Harris 2014, pp. 345–346.
  35. Royle 2006, p. 108.
  36. Royle 2006, pp. 127–128.
  37. Harris 2014, pp. 347–348.
  38. Kaplan 1979, p. 207.
  39. Kaplan 1979, p. 208.
  40. Rees 2016, pp. 118–119.
  41. Royle 2006, pp. 609–611.

Sources

Bibliography