Dalisi

Dalisi
Dalisi
Chinese name
Chinese	大理寺
Hanyu Pinyin
Transcriptions
Standard Mandarin
Hanyu Pinyin	Dàlǐ Sì
Wade–Giles	Ta4-li3 Szu4
Möllendorff	beiden be tuwancihiyara yamun

Last updated October 06, 2025

ᠪᡝᡳᡩᡝᠨ ᠪᡝ
ᡨᡠᠸᠠᠨᠴᡳᡥᡳᠶᠠᡵᠠ
ᠶᠠᠮᡠᠨ

↑ "The Relationship of "Humanity, Reason and Law" with Chinese Legal Traditions" (PDF). Shenyang Normal University. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2024-09-13. Retrieved 2024-11-17.
↑ Wickes, Dean R. WickesDean R. (2019-10-24), "WANG Yongji", Eminent Chinese of the Qing Period, Berkshire Publishing Group, doi:10.1093/acref/9780190088019.001.0001/acref-9780190088019-e-699, ISBN 978-1-61472-033-1 , retrieved 2024-11-17
↑ "From the Imperial Capital to the Magistrate's Court: Judicial Practices in Imperial China". academic.oup.com. Retrieved 2024-11-17.
↑ "CONTRACTS AS TOOLS TO PROMOTE MORALITY AND SOCIAL ORDER: THE TANG DYNASTY'S REGULATION OF CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIPS" (PDF). Tsinghua China Law Review. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2024-11-17. Retrieved 2024-11-17.
↑ 北宋·王讜，《唐語林》（卷8）：“大理則於棘下訊鞫其罪，所謂‘大司寇聽刑於棘木之下’。”
↑ "古代大理寺名称及职能的演变 – 北京政法网". www.bj148.org. Archived from the original on 2024-11-17. Retrieved 2024-11-17.
↑ 南宋·徐夢莘，《三朝北盟會編》（卷207）：“初，飛在大理寺獄，未肯招狀，先是飛自郾陵回軍也，在一村寺中，與王貴、張憲、董先、王俊夜坐，移時不語，忽作聲曰：‘天下事竟如何？’眾皆不敢應，唯憲徐言曰：‘在相公處置耳。’既退，俊握先及貴手曰：‘太尉，太尉聞適來相公之言及張太尉之對否？’先與貴曰：‘然。’及俊告飛使子雲通書軍中事，因言郾陵路中之語，舊校云：王俊首武穆反狀，《揮塵餘話》載之最詳，追先赴行在，秦檜與先曰：‘止是有一句言語要爾爲證，證了只今日便可出。’仍差大理官二人送先赴大理寺，並命證畢，就今日摘出，繇是先下大理寺對吏，即伏，吏問飛，飛猶不伏，有獄子事飛甚謹，至是獄子倚門斜立無恭謹之狀，飛異之，獄子忽然而言曰：‘我平生以岳飛爲忠臣，故伏侍甚謹，不敢少慢，今乃逆臣耳！’飛聞之，請問其故，獄子曰：‘君臣不可疑，疑則爲亂，故君疑臣則誅，臣疑君則反，若臣疑於君不反，復爲君疑而誅之，若君疑於臣而不誅，則復疑於君而必反。君今疑臣矣，故送下棘寺，豈有復出之理？死故無疑矣！少保若不死出獄，則復疑於君，安得不反？反既明甚，此所以爲逆臣也！’”

Bibliography

Hucker, Charles O. (1985). A Dictionary of Official Titles in Imperial China. Stanford University Press. p. 468.

This article related to the history of China is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

This article related to the history of Vietnam or its predecessor states is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

[1] "The Relationship of "Humanity, Reason and Law" with Chinese Legal Traditions" (PDF). Shenyang Normal University. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2024-09-13. Retrieved 2024-11-17.

[2] Wickes, Dean R. WickesDean R. (2019-10-24), "WANG Yongji", Eminent Chinese of the Qing Period, Berkshire Publishing Group, doi:10.1093/acref/9780190088019.001.0001/acref-9780190088019-e-699, ISBN 978-1-61472-033-1 , retrieved 2024-11-17

[3] "From the Imperial Capital to the Magistrate's Court: Judicial Practices in Imperial China". academic.oup.com. Retrieved 2024-11-17.

[4] "CONTRACTS AS TOOLS TO PROMOTE MORALITY AND SOCIAL ORDER: THE TANG DYNASTY'S REGULATION OF CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIPS" (PDF). Tsinghua China Law Review. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2024-11-17. Retrieved 2024-11-17.

[5] 北宋·王讜，《唐語林》（卷8）：“大理則於棘下訊鞫其罪，所謂‘大司寇聽刑於棘木之下’。”

[6] "古代大理寺名称及职能的演变 – 北京政法网". www.bj148.org. Archived from the original on 2024-11-17. Retrieved 2024-11-17.

[7] 南宋·徐夢莘，《三朝北盟會編》（卷207）：“初，飛在大理寺獄，未肯招狀，先是飛自郾陵回軍也，在一村寺中，與王貴、張憲、董先、王俊夜坐，移時不語，忽作聲曰：‘天下事竟如何？’眾皆不敢應，唯憲徐言曰：‘在相公處置耳。’既退，俊握先及貴手曰：‘太尉，太尉聞適來相公之言及張太尉之對否？’先與貴曰：‘然。’及俊告飛使子雲通書軍中事，因言郾陵路中之語，舊校云：王俊首武穆反狀，《揮塵餘話》載之最詳，追先赴行在，秦檜與先曰：‘止是有一句言語要爾爲證，證了只今日便可出。’仍差大理官二人送先赴大理寺，並命證畢，就今日摘出，繇是先下大理寺對吏，即伏，吏問飛，飛猶不伏，有獄子事飛甚謹，至是獄子倚門斜立無恭謹之狀，飛異之，獄子忽然而言曰：‘我平生以岳飛爲忠臣，故伏侍甚謹，不敢少慢，今乃逆臣耳！’飛聞之，請問其故，獄子曰：‘君臣不可疑，疑則爲亂，故君疑臣則誅，臣疑君則反，若臣疑於君不反，復爲君疑而誅之，若君疑於臣而不誅，則復疑於君而必反。君今疑臣矣，故送下棘寺，豈有復出之理？死故無疑矣！少保若不死出獄，則復疑於君，安得不反？反既明甚，此所以爲逆臣也！’”