Green belt (United Kingdom)

Last updated
Designated areas of green belt in England; the Metropolitan Green Belt outlined in red The Metropolitan Green Belt among the green belts of England.svg
Designated areas of green belt in England; the Metropolitan Green Belt outlined in red

In British town planning, the green belt is a policy for controlling urban growth. The term, coined by Octavia Hill in 1875, [1] [2] refers to a ring of countryside where urbanisation will be resisted for the foreseeable future, maintaining an area where local food growing, forestry and outdoor leisure can be expected to prevail. The fundamental aim of green belt policy is to prevent urban sprawl by keeping land permanently green, and consequently the most important attribute of green belts is their openness.

Contents

The Metropolitan Green Belt around London was first proposed by the Greater London Regional Planning Committee in 1935. The Town and Country Planning Act 1947 then allowed local authorities to include green belt proposals in their development plans. In 1955, Minister of Housing Duncan Sandys encouraged local authorities around the country to consider protecting land around their towns and cities by the formal designation of clearly defined green belts. [3] [4]

Green belt policy has been criticised for reducing the amount of land available for building and therefore pushing up house prices, [5] as 70% of the cost of building new houses is the purchase of the land (up from 25% in the late 1950s). [6]

England and Wales

The government formerly set out its policies and principles towards green belts in England and Wales in Planning Policy Guidance Note 2: Green Belts, [7] but this planning guidance was superseded by the National Planning Policy Framework [8] (NPPF) in March 2012. Planning authorities are strongly urged to follow the NPPF's detailed advice when considering whether to permit additional development in the green belt. In the green belt there is a general presumption against inappropriate development, unless very special circumstances can be demonstrated to show that the benefits of the development will outweigh the harm caused to the green belt. The NPPF sets out what would constitute appropriate development in the green belt.

According to the NPPF, there are five stated purposes of including land within the green belt:

Once an area of land has been defined as green belt, the stated opportunities and benefits include:

England

Although 16 city and town urban cores are identified by the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (DLUHC) who are the present central government department maintaining responsibility for green belts, [9] a countryside interest group, Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE) continue to group these into 14 green belt areas, the North West green belt encompassing three urban cores. [10] [11]

The area designated as green belt land in England as at 12 October 2023 was estimated at 1,638,420 hectares, about 13 per cent of the land area. [9]

Green belt (DLUHC) [12] Green belt (CPRE) [13] Urban core
Bath and Bristol Avon Green Belt Bristol and Bath
Birmingham West Midlands Green Belt West Midlands, Birmingham, Coventry
Blackpool North West Green Belt Blackpool
Burton upon Trent Burton upon Trent and Swadlincote Green Belt Burton upon Trent and Swadlincote
Cambridge Cambridge Green Belt Cambridge
Carnforth, Lancaster and MorecambeNorth West Green Belt Lancaster, Morecambe, Carnforth
Derby and Nottingham Nottingham and Derby Green Belt Nottingham and Derby
Gloucester Gloucester and Cheltenham Green Belt Gloucester and Cheltenham
London area Metropolitan Green Belt Greater London
Merseyside and Greater ManchesterNorth West Green Belt Merseyside, Greater Manchester
Oxford Oxford Green Belt Oxford
South and West Yorkshire South and West Yorkshire Green Belt South Yorkshire and West Yorkshire
South West Hampshire South West Hampshire/South East Dorset Green Belt Dorset, Bournemouth and Poole
Stoke-on-Trent Stoke-on-Trent Green Belt Stoke-on-Trent
Tyne and Wear North East Green Belt Tyne and Wear, Durham and Hexham
York York Green Belt York

The distribution of green belt designated land by region of England as in 2003, [14] 2013 [15] and 2023 [9] was as follows:

Region2003 area (hectares)2013 area (hectares)2023 area (hectares)*
East/London/South East 627,160580,570574,040
East Midlands 79,52078,95077,410
North East 66,33073,06098,550
North West 260,610262,440254,350
South West 106,180110,620107,970
West Midlands 269,140269,360264,510
Yorkshire and the Humber 262,640264,290261,600
England total1,671,5801,639,2901,638,420

* Counts are rounded [9]

The total area of green belt land in England since 2003 was as follows: [15]

Year20032004200620072008/092009/102010/112011/122012/132013/142017/18
Area (hectares)1,671,580Increase2.svg 1,678,190Decrease2.svg 1,631,830Increase2.svg 1,635,670Increase2.svg 1,639,650Decrease2.svg 1,639,530Steady2.svg 1,639,530Decrease2.svg 1,639,480Decrease2.svg 1,639,160Decrease2.svg 1,638,610Decrease2.svg 1,629,510

As well as any underlying re-designations, changes in green belt area are explained in part by alterations in land designation by local authorities, and may also be influenced by improvements with measurement associated with digital mapping. Note that from 2006, estimates exclude the area of Green Belt land in New Forest DC and Test Valley BC (47,300 hectares) which were designated as New Forest National Park in 2005.

Wales

Wales has one green belt, between the cities of Cardiff and Newport. [16]

Northern Ireland

Northern Ireland has 30 green belt areas, [17] accounting for approximately 226,600 hectares, about 16 percent of its total area. [18]

Scotland

Green belt policy in Scotland is set out in Scottish Planning Policy (SPP) 21, published by the Scottish Government in February 2010. On 29 November, the Government published "Green Belt Policy in Scotland 10/85"

As of 2010 Scotland had 10 green belt areas: Aberdeen, Ayr, Clackmannanshire, East Lothian, Edinburgh, Falkirk and Grangemouth, Greater Glasgow, Midlothian and Stirling. There are also plans for green belts around Dunfermline, Perth and St Andrews.

The Scottish Government is clear that the purpose of green belt designation in the development plan as part of the settlement strategy for an area is to:

However, the Scottish Government recognises that certain types of development might actually promote and support appropriate rural diversification:

The Government requires that locally established green belt plans: maintain the identity of a city by the clearly establishing physical boundaries and preventing coalescence; provide countryside for recreation of denizens; and maintain the landscape setting of the city in question. In its Planning Policy (129), the Scottish Government states that:

“All public bodies, including planning authorities, have a duty to further the conservation of biodiversity under the Nature Conservation (Scotland) Act 2004, and this should be reflected in development plans and development management decisions. Biodiversity is important because it provides natural services and products that we rely on, is an important element of sustainable development and makes an essential contribution to Scotland's economy and cultural heritage.” [19]

History

The term emerged from continental Europe where broad boulevards were increasingly used to separate new development from the centre of historic towns; most notably the Ringstraße in Vienna. Various proposals were put forward from 1890 onwards but the first to garner widespread support was put forward by the London Society in its "Development Plan of Greater London" 1919. Alongside the CPRE they lobbied for a continuous belt (of up to two miles wide) to prevent urban sprawl, beyond which new development could occur.

Implementation of the notion dated from Herbert Morrison's 1934 leadership of the London County Council. It was first formally proposed by the Greater London Regional Planning Committee in 1935, "to provide a reserve supply of public open spaces and of recreational areas and to establish a green belt or girdle of open space". It was again included in an advisory Greater London Plan prepared by Patrick Abercrombie in 1944 (which sought a belt of up to six miles wide). However, it was some 14 years before the elected local authorities responsible for the area around London had all defined the area on scaled maps with some precision (encouraged by Duncan Sandys to designate a belt of some 7–10 miles wide).

The motives for a green belt around London were not just environmental, Frank Pick the CEO of the London Passenger Transport Board made an economic case; he believed that London Underground had a finite potential capacity which would be breached by the growth of the city's population and overall physical size. Pick presented this case to the Barlow Commission (Royal Commission on the Geographical Distribution of the Industrial Population), arguing that if London’s radius grew beyond 12–15 miles, the capital’s commuter infrastructure could not cope in financial or capacity terms, to the detriment of city's overall economy. He instead made the case for a number of economically self-sufficient new towns beyond a new green belt. [21]

New provisions for compensation in the Town and Country Planning Act 1947 allowed local authorities around the country to incorporate green belt proposals in their first development plans. The codification of Green Belt policy and its extension to areas other than London came with the historic Circular 42/55 inviting local planning authorities to consider the establishment of green belts. This decision was made in tandem with the 1946 New Towns Act, which sought to depopulate urban centres in the South East of England and accommodate people in new settlements elsewhere. Green belt could therefore be designated by local authorities without worry that it would come into conflict with pressure from population growth.

As the outward growth of London was seen to be firmly repressed, residents owning properties further from the built-up area also campaigned for this policy of urban restraint, partly to safeguard their own investments but often invoking an idealised scenic/rustic argument which laid the blame for most social ills upon urban influences. In mid-1971, for example, the government decided to extend the Metropolitan Green Belt northwards to include almost all of Hertfordshire. The Metropolitan Green Belt now covers parts of 68 different Districts or Boroughs.

Since 1955 London's green belt has extended significantly, stretching some 35 miles out in places. London's green belt now covers an area of 516,000 hectares, an area broadly three times larger than that of London itself. The London Society began debate about the city's green belt in 2014 with publication of a report entitled "Green Sprawl". [22] [23] [24] Other organisations, including the Planning Officers Society, [25] have since responded with specific calls for a review and proposals to balance land release with environmental protection. [26] [27] [28] In 2016, the London Society and the All Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) for London's Planning and Built Environment published plans for a 'green web' to replace the green belt in some locations. [29] The ambition is to create a "multifunctional green infrastructure landscape" in which new-build and publicly accessible natural space sat side by side. [30]

Research undertaken by the London School of Economics in 2016 [31] suggests that by 1979, the area covered by green belt in England comprised 721,500 hectares, and by 1993, this had been extended to 1,652,310 hectares. [32]

Criticism

Several academics, policy groups and town planning organisations in recent years have criticised the idea and implementation of green belts in the UK. Green belt policy has been attacked as too rigid in the face of new urban and environmental challenges, principally the lack of housing available in many cities in the UK. The policy has been criticised for reducing the amount of land available for building and therefore pushing up house prices, as 70% of the cost of building new houses is the purchase of the land (up from 25% in the late 1950s). [33] It has also been claimed that areas of green belt can be of unremarkable environmental quality, and may not be well managed or provide the recreational opportunities originally envisaged.

Environmental

The Town and Country Planning Association, an organisation heavily involved in initiating the concept several decades previously, published a policy statement in 2002, [34] which proposed a more flexible policy which would allow the introduction of green wedge and strategic gap policies rather than green belts, and so permit the expansion of some urban areas. In October 2007, Sir Martin Doughty, then Chair of Natural England, argued for a review of green belts, saying: "The time has come for a greener green belt. We need a 21st century solution to England's housing needs which puts in place a network of green wedges, gaps and corridors, linking the natural environment and people.". [35] Similarly, the London Society published a comprehensive history of the green belt (as it emerged in the first part of the twentieth century) in 2014. Authored by the influential English urbanist Jonathan Manns, this called for a "move away from the simplistic and naïve idea that countryside is a sacrosanct patchwork of medieval hedgerows and towards an empirically informed position which once more recognises housing as a need to be met in locations with appropriate environmental capacity". [22]

Effect on house prices

Value of land and buildings in the UK from 1995 to 2016 (trillions). Value of land and buildings in the UK.png
Value of land and buildings in the UK from 1995 to 2016 (trillions).

The Economist has criticised green belt policy, saying that unless more houses are built through reforming planning laws and releasing green belt land, then housing space will need to be rationed out. In March 2014, it was noted that if general inflation had risen as fast as housing prices had since 1971, a chicken would cost £51; and that Britain is "building less homes today than at any point since the 1920s". [37] According to the Institute of Economic Affairs, there is "overwhelming empirical evidence that that planning restrictions have a substantial impact on housing costs" and are the main reason why housing is two and a half times more expensive in 2011 than it was in 1975. [38] The free market Adam Smith Institute is a particular critic of the green belt, [39] [40] [41] and has claimed that removing the green belt from land within ten minutes walk of a railway station would release enough land to build 1 million homes.

In response to the claims made by the Adams Smith Institute, the Royal Town Planning Institute commissioned the Building In The Green Belt? [42] report to look into the commuting patterns in London's metropolitan green belt. The study found only 7.4% of commuters, who lived near a railway station actually travelled to London by train on a regular basis with the vast majority (72%) travelling by private vehicle to jobs in their hometown and to other places not within London. Thus the proposal put forward in the Adam Smith report could result in 3.96 to 7.45 million additional car journeys per week on already congested roads around London. CPRE say it is a myth to connect green belts to rising house prices, since there is no clear difference in house prices between cities with green belts and cities without them, and both land and house prices are inflated by other factors such as investment.

Lewis Abbott has identified green belt barriers to urban expansion as one of several major protectionist political-economic barriers to house building with negative effects on the supply, cost/prices, and quality of new homes. (The others include new housing development taxes and quasi-taxes; political discrimination against particular classes of new housing supplier, household consumer, and housing product; and controls on housing technical-product development – in particular, the blocking of innovative low-cost house building using new materials and production technologies). Abbott argues that the greenbelts actually defeat their own stated objective of saving the countryside and open spaces. By preventing existing towns and cities from extending normally and organically, they result in more land-extensive housing developments further out – i.e., the establishment beyond the greenbelts of new communities with lower building densities, their own built infrastructure and other facilities, and greater dependence on cars and commuting, etc. Meanwhile, valuable urban green space and brownfield sites best suited to industry and commerce are lost in existing conurbations as more and more new housing is crammed into them. [43] [44]

Commentators such as Alan Evans [45] and Tom Papworth [46] have called for outright abolition of green belts, principally on the grounds that by inhibiting the free use of land they restrict home ownership.

However, in England, where 65% of people are property-owners who benefit from scarcity of building land, the concept of "green belt" has become entrenched as a fundamental part of government policy, and the possibility of reviewing boundaries is often viewed with considerable hostility by environmental charities, neighbouring communities and their elected representatives. [47] [48]

The general concept of "green belt" has evolved in recent years to encompass "Greenspace" and "Greenstructure", taking into account urban greenspace, an important aspect of sustainable development in the 21st century. However, while in general these concepts are quite distinct in the UK from the green belt as a statutory development plan designation, an exception occurs in London where land may be designated as "Metropolitan Open Land" (MOL). Areas of MOL are subject to the same planning restrictions as the green belt while lying within the urban area. In 2005, the European Commission's COST Action C11 (COST European Cooperation in Science and Technology) undertook in-depth city case studies into cities across 15 European countries. Sheffield was one such case study city for the UK. Conclusions were published in "Case studies in Greenstructure Planning".

See also

Related Research Articles

An urban growth boundary, or UGB, is a regional boundary, set in an attempt to control urban sprawl by, in its simplest form, mandating that the area inside the boundary be used for urban development and the area outside be preserved in its natural state or used for agriculture. Legislating for an "urban growth boundary" is one way, among many others, of managing the major challenges posed by unplanned urban growth and the encroachment of cities upon agricultural and rural land.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Green belt</span> Largely undeveloped, wild, or agricultural land surrounding urban areas

A green belt is a policy, and land-use zone designation used in land-use planning to retain areas of largely undeveloped, wild, or agricultural land surrounding or neighboring urban areas. Similar concepts are greenways or green wedges, which have a linear character and may run through an urban area instead of around it. In essence, a green belt is an invisible line designating a border around a certain area, preventing development of the area and allowing wildlife to return and be established.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">CPRE</span> Charity in England

CPRE, The Countryside Charity, formerly known by names such as the Council for the Preservation of Rural England and the Campaign to Protect Rural England, is a charity in England with over 40,000 members and supporters. Formed in 1926 by Patrick Abercrombie to limit urban sprawl and ribbon development, the CPRE claims to be one of the longest running environmental groups in the UK. CPRE campaigns for a "sustainable future" for the English countryside. They state it is "a vital but undervalued environmental, economic and social asset to the nation." They aim to "highlight threats and promote positive solutions." They campaign using their own research to lobby the public and all levels of government.

The new towns in the United Kingdom were planned under the powers of the New Towns Act 1946 and later acts to relocate populations in poor or bombed-out housing following the Second World War. They were developed in three waves. Later developments included the expanded towns: existing towns which were substantially expanded to accommodate what was called the "overspill" population from densely populated areas of deprivation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Urban sprawl</span> Expansion of auto-oriented, low-density development in suburbs

Urban sprawl is defined as "the spreading of urban developments on undeveloped land near a more or less densely populated city". Urban sprawl has been described as the unrestricted growth in many urban areas of housing, commercial development, and roads over large expanses of land, with little concern for very dense urban planning. Sometimes the urban areas described as the most "sprawling" are the most densely populated. In addition to describing a special form of urbanization, the term also relates to the social and environmental consequences associated with this development. In modern times some suburban areas described as "sprawl" have less detached housing and higher density than the nearby core city. Medieval suburbs suffered from the loss of protection of city walls, before the advent of industrial warfare. Modern disadvantages and costs include increased travel time, transport costs, pollution, and destruction of the countryside. The revenue for building and maintaining urban infrastructure in these areas are gained mostly through property and sales taxes. Most jobs in the US are now located in suburbs generating much of the revenue, although a lack of growth will require higher tax rates.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Affordability of housing in the United Kingdom</span> Housing affordability in the UK

The affordability of housing in the UK reflects the ability to rent or buy property. There are various ways to determine or estimate housing affordability. One commonly used metric is the median housing affordability ratio; this compares the median price paid for residential property to the median gross annual earnings for full-time workers. According to official government statistics, housing affordability worsened between 2020 and 2021, and since 1997 housing affordability has worsened overall, especially in London. The most affordable local authorities in 2021 were in the North West, Wales, Yorkshire and The Humber, West Midlands and North East.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ribbon development</span>

Ribbon development refers to the building of houses along the routes of communications radiating from a human settlement. The resulting linear settlements are clearly visible on land use maps and aerial photographs, giving cities and the countryside a particular character. Such development generated great concern in the United Kingdom during the 1920s and the 1930s as well as in numerous other countries during the decades since.

Town and country planning in the United Kingdom is the part of English land law which concerns land use planning. Its goal is to ensure sustainable economic development and a better environment. Each country of the United Kingdom has its own planning system that is responsible for town and country planning, which outside of England is devolved to the Northern Ireland Assembly, the Scottish Parliament and the Senedd.

In the United Kingdom, Planning Policy Guidance Notes (PPG) were statements of the Government's national policy and principles towards certain aspects of the town planning framework.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Overspill estate</span> Type of housing

An overspill estate is a housing estate planned and built for the housing of excess population in urban areas, both from the natural increase of population and often in order to rehouse people from decaying inner city areas, usually as part of the process of slum clearance. They were created on the outskirts of most large British towns and during most of the 20th century, with new towns being an alternative approach outside London after World War II. The objective of this was to bring more economic activity to these smaller communities, whilst relieving pressure on overpopulated areas of major cities. The Town Development Act 1952 encouraged the expansion of neighbouring urban areas rather than the creation of satellite communities. The authorities wished to divert people living in poor conditions within highly populous cities to better conditions on the outskirts of these cities. Overspill not only involves moving people to a new area, but requires industry and employment to follow. Often the industries and resources took longer to migrate than the people, hence there were a number of issues surrounding early overspill projects. Slum clearance tenants often had problems with the move, since it separated them from extended family and friends, needed services were often lacking, and only the better off workers could afford the extra cost of commuting back to their jobs. Another criticism was that the new estates occupied what had been productive agricultural land.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Metropolitan Green Belt</span> Statutory green belt around London, England

The Metropolitan Green Belt is a statutory green belt around London, England. It comprises parts of Greater London, Berkshire, Buckinghamshire, Essex, Hertfordshire, Kent and Surrey, parts of two of the three districts of Bedfordshire and a small area in Copthorne, Sussex. As of 2017/18, Government statistics show the planning designation covered 513,860 hectares of land.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Planning Policy Framework</span> Land-use planning policy in the U.K.

The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) is a land-use planning policy in England. It was originally published by the UK's Department of Communities and Local Government in March 2012, consolidating over two dozen previously issued documents called Planning Policy Statements (PPS) and Planning Policy Guidance Notes (PPG) for use in England. It has since been revised in 2018, 2019, 2021 and twice in 2023. The live version is from December 2023.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nottingham and Derby Green Belt</span>

The Nottingham and Derby Green Belt is a green belt environmental and planning policy for the cities of Derby and Nottingham in the East Midlands region of England. It includes designated parts of several districts in the surrounding counties of Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire. Management is mainly performed by the local planning authority on guidance from central government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Burton upon Trent and Swadlincote Green Belt</span>

The Burton upon Trent and Swadlincote Green Belt is a green belt environmental and planning policy that regulates the rural space between the towns of Burton upon Trent and Swadlincote, in the counties of Derbyshire and Staffordshire, within the East Midlands region of England. Essentially, the function of the belt in this location is to prevent the towns merging by lessening urban sprawl. It is managed by local planning authorities on guidance from central government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">South and West Yorkshire Green Belt</span> The green belt areas of South and West Yorkshire, England

The South and West Yorkshire Green Belt is an environmental and planning policy that regulates the rural space within the Yorkshire and the Humber region of England. The function of the green belt policy in South and West Yorkshire is to manage development around the cities, towns and villages in the West Yorkshire Urban Area, the Sheffield urban area, Barnsley and Doncaster, to discourage urban sprawl. It is managed by local planning authorities on guidance from central government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">York Green Belt</span> Urban regulation and planning policy

The City of York Green Belt is an environmental and planning policy that regulates the rural space within the Yorkshire and the Humber region of England. The York city green belt is within the county of North Yorkshire. The policy's core function is to manage development around York and the surrounding area, preserving its setting and historic character, discouraging urban sprawl, and the convergence of outer villages into the city's built up areas. It is managed by local planning authorities on guidance from central government.

The North East Green Belt, also known as the Tyne & Wear Green Belt, is a non-statutory green belt environmental and planning policy that regulates the rural space in part of the North East region of England. It is centred on the county of Tyne and Wear, with areas of green belt extending into Northumberland and County Durham. It functions to protect surrounding towns and villages outside the Tyneside/Newcastle-upon-Tyne and Wearside/Sunderland conurbations from further convergence. This is managed by local planning authorities on guidance from central government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Avon Green Belt</span>

The Avon Green Belt, also known as the Bristol and Bath Green Belt, is a non-statutory green belt environmental and planning policy that regulates urban expansion and development in the countryside surrounding the cities of Bristol and Bath in the South West region of England. It covers areas in Bristol, South Gloucestershire, North Somerset, Bath and North East Somerset, Mendip, and Wiltshire. Essentially, the function of the green belt is to limit urban sprawl and maintain the open character of areas around the Bristol and Bath built up areas, and nearby towns and villages. The policy is implemented by local planning authorities on the basis of guidance from central government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oxford Green Belt</span>

The Oxford Green Belt is a green belt environmental and planning policy that regulates the rural space in Oxfordshire, within the South East region of England. It is centred on the city of Oxford, along with surrounding areas. Its core function is to control urban growth and development in and around the Oxford built-up area. It is managed by the local planning authorities on basis of guidance from central government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ethel Haythornthwaite</span> English environmental campaigner

Ethel Mary Bassett Haythornthwaite was an English environmental campaigner, activist and poet. She was a pioneer of countryside protection as well as town and country planning both locally and nationally. She founded the Sheffield Association for the Protection of Rural Scenery, also known as the Sheffield Association for the Protection of Local Countryside in 1924, which became the local branch of CPRE in 1927, and worked to protect the countryside of the Peak District from development. She forefronted the appeal to save the 747-acre Longshaw Estate from development, and helped acquire land around Sheffield that became its green belt. She was appointed to the UK government’s National Parks Committee, and helped to make the successful case for the National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949, which led to the founding of the Peak District National Park in 1951. She also helped make green belts part of government policy in 1955.

References

  1. ↑ "London's green belt: the forgotten strangler of the capital". The Guardian. 16 May 2012. Retrieved 2 December 2022.
  2. ↑ "How the battle for Hampstead Heath inspired the National Trust". Ham & High. Retrieved 2 December 2022.
  3. ↑ "Q&A: England's green belt". BBC News. 15 August 2007. Retrieved 4 May 2010.
  4. ↑ Geography; An Integrated Approach - David Waugh
  5. ↑ Koster, Hans (2023). "The Welfare Effects of Greenbelt Policy: Evidence from England". The Economic Journal. doi: 10.1093/ej/uead077 . hdl: 10419/205313 .
  6. ↑ It's Land, stupid, Inside Housing, archived from the original on 24 September 2015
  7. ↑ "Planning Policy Guidance 2: Green belts - Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM)". Archived from the original on 9 January 2006. Retrieved 9 January 2006.
  8. ↑ "National Planning Policy Framework".
  9. 1 2 3 4 "Local authority green belt: England 2022-23 - statistical release". GOV.UK. Retrieved 12 November 2023.
  10. ↑ "CPRE - State of the Green Belt 2023 - A vision for the 21st century - August 2023" (PDF).
  11. ↑ "Green Belt facts". CPRE. Retrieved 12 November 2023.
  12. ↑ "Local authority green belt statistics for England: 2016 to 2017 - GOV.UK". www.gov.uk. Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government (MHCLG).
  13. ↑ Fawcett, Tony. "Green Belts in England: Key facts - Campaign to Protect Rural England". CPRE. Archived from the original on 5 April 2018. Retrieved 4 April 2018.
  14. ↑ "Local authority green belt statistics for England: 2010 to 2011 - Statistics on designated green belt land. From Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government and Andrew Stunell OBE, Published 15 April 2011 - Annex 3: regional trend in the area of green belt land since 1997".
  15. 1 2 "Local authority green belt statistics for England: 2013 to 2014". GOV.UK .
  16. ↑ "Newport Local Development Plan 2011–2026" (PDF). Retrieved 3 February 2020.
  17. ↑ "Q&A: England's green belt". BBC News. 15 August 2007. Retrieved 25 September 2014.
  18. ↑ "e-Digest Statistics about: Land Use and Land Cover". Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. 1 June 2005. Archived from the original on 21 August 2008. Retrieved 2 January 2009.
  19. 1 2 "Scottish Planning Policy". scotland.gov.uk. Retrieved 25 September 2014.
  20. ↑ Scottish Parliament Green Belt Policy Archived 25 December 2010 at the Wayback Machine
  21. ↑ Green sprawl Our current affection for a preservation myth?, Johnathon Manns, The London Society, 2014
  22. 1 2 Manns, J., "Green Sprawl: Our Current Affection for a Preservation Myth?" London Society, London, 2014
  23. ↑ "'London's green belt isn't sacrosanct … we need to build homes on it'". London Evening Standard. 9 December 2014. Retrieved 18 December 2018.
  24. ↑ "Peter Murray: Is London's Green Belt overprotected?". onofficemagazine.com. Archived from the original on 22 February 2019. Retrieved 18 December 2018.
  25. ↑ Planning Officers Society, Planning For a Better Future: Our Manifesto for the Next Government, Aylesbury, March 2015 Archived 17 November 2015 at the Wayback Machine
  26. ↑ "The Green Belt: A Place for Londoners?", London First, London, 2015
  27. ↑ "Delivering Change: Building Homes Where we Need Them", Centre for Cities, London, 2015
  28. ↑ AECOM, Big Bold Global Connected London 2065, http://www.aecom.com/deployedfiles/Internet/Geographies/Europe/Document%20Library/AECOM%20Manifesto%20for%20the%20London%20City%20Region_low%20res.pdf%5B%5D
  29. ↑ Manns, J., & Falk, N., "Re/Shaping London: Unlocking Sustainable Growth in West London and Beyond", The London Society, 2016.
  30. ↑ Dunton, J., "Report backs 'green web' plan for London", Planning Resource, 21 October 2016.
  31. ↑ LSE (2016). "A 21st Century Metropolitan Green Belt" (PDF).[ permanent dead link ]
  32. ↑ "Green Belt - Hansard". hansard.parliament.uk. Retrieved 30 November 2018.
  33. ↑ Colin Wiles (8 January 2013), It's Land, Stupid, Inside Housing, archived from the original on 24 September 2015
  34. ↑ "Green Belts" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 July 2015.
  35. ↑ Time for a greener green belt, says Natural England Archived 2 January 2008 at the Wayback Machine
  36. ↑ "The UK national balance sheet: 2017 estimates".
  37. ↑ "Build on the green belt or introduce space rationing: your choice", The Economist, 24 March 2014
  38. ↑ Kristian Niemietz (April 2012), Abundance of land, shortage of housing (PDF), The Institute of Economic Affairs, archived from the original (PDF) on 24 September 2015, retrieved 15 August 2015
  39. ↑ "Green belt is the reason for rabbit hutch UK", adamsmith.org, 18 June 2014
  40. ↑ "The Green Noose", adamsmith.org, 14 January 2015
  41. ↑ "Re-examining London's misnamed green belt", adamsmith.org, 16 March 2015
  42. ↑ Building in the green belt: A report into commuting patterns in the Metropolitan green belt (PDF), 15 August 2015
  43. ↑ Political Barriers To Housebuilding In Britain: A Critical Case Study Of Protectionism & Its Industrial-Commercial Effects, Industrial Systems Research/ Google Books, revised electronic edition 2013. Chapter two: “Greenbelt Barriers To Urban Expansion.” Ebook ISBN   9780906321645 [2]
  44. ↑ "Housebuilding and Land (2): Political and Legal Influences" in Housebuilding and the New Homes Market: A Survey, ISR/Google Books, Revised electronic edition 2013. Ebook ISBN   9780906321560.
  45. ↑ "Call for green belt rules to be scrapped". The Guardian. 24 January 2007. Retrieved 18 December 2018.
  46. ↑ Papworth, T., "The Green Noose", Adam Smith Institute, London, 2014
  47. ↑ "Oxford Green Belt Network Website". oxfordgreenbelt.net. Archived from the original on 18 December 2014. Retrieved 25 September 2014.
  48. ↑ "Documents | Friends of the Earth". foe.co.uk. Archived from the original on 7 February 2012. Retrieved 25 September 2014.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.