Heaviside cover-up method

Last updated
Portrait of Oliver Heaviside Oliver Heaviside, ET Library Archives, corrected.jpg
Portrait of Oliver Heaviside

The Heaviside cover-up method, named after Oliver Heaviside, is a technique for quickly determining the coefficients when performing the partial-fraction expansion of a rational function in the case of linear factors. [1] [2] [3] [4]

Contents

Method

Separation of a fractional algebraic expression into partial fractions is the reverse of the process of combining fractions by converting each fraction to the lowest common denominator (LCD) and adding the numerators. This separation can be accomplished by the Heaviside cover-up method, another method for determining the coefficients of a partial fraction. Case one has fractional expressions where factors in the denominator are unique. Case two has fractional expressions where some factors may repeat as powers of a binomial.

In integral calculus we would want to write a fractional algebraic expression as the sum of its partial fractions in order to take the integral of each simple fraction separately. Once the original denominator, D0, has been factored we set up a fraction for each factor in the denominator. We may use a subscripted D to represent the denominator of the respective partial fractions which are the factors in D0. Letters A, B, C, D, E, and so on will represent the numerators of the respective partial fractions. When a partial fraction term has a single (i.e. unrepeated) binomial in the denominator, the numerator is a residue of the function defined by the input fraction.

We calculate each respective numerator by (1) taking the root of the denominator (i.e. the value of x that makes the denominator zero) and (2) then substituting this root into the original expression but ignoring the corresponding factor in the denominator. Each root for the variable is the value which would give an undefined value to the expression since we do not divide by zero.

General formula for a cubic denominator with three distinct roots:

Where

and where

and where

Case one

Factorize the expression in the denominator. Set up a partial fraction for each factor in the denominator. Apply the cover-up rule to solve for the new numerator of each partial fraction.

Example

Set up a partial fraction for each factor in the denominator. With this framework we apply the cover-up rule to solve for A, B, and C.

  1. D1 is x + 1; set it equal to zero. This gives the residue for A when x = 1.
  2. Next, substitute this value of x into the fractional expression, but without D1.
  3. Put this value down as the value of A.

Proceed similarly for B and C.

D2 is x + 2; For the residue B use x = 2.

D3 is x + 3; For residue C use x = 3.

Thus, to solve for A, use x = 1 in the expression but without D1:

Thus, to solve for B, use x = 2 in the expression but without D2:

Thus, to solve for C, use x = 3 in the expression but without D3:

Thus,

Case two

When factors of the denominator include powers of one expression we

  1. Set up a partial fraction for each unique factor and each lower power of D;
  2. Set up an equation showing the relation of the numerators if all were converted to the LCD.

From the equation of numerators we solve for each numerator, A, B, C, D, and so on. This equation of the numerators is an absolute identity, true for all values of x. So, we may select any value of x and solve for the numerator.

Example

Here, we set up a partial fraction for each descending power of the denominator. Then we solve for the numerators, A and B. As is a repeated factor, we now need to find two numbers, as so we need an additional relation in order to solve for both. To write the relation of numerators the second fraction needs another factor of to convert it to the LCD, giving us . In general, if a binomial factor is raised to the power of , then constants will be needed, each appearing divided by successive powers, , where runs from 1 to . The cover-up rule can be used to find , but is still that is called the residue. Here, , , and

To solve for  :

can be solved by setting the denominator of the first fraction to zero, .

Solving for gives the cover-up value for : when .

When we substitute this value, , we get:

To solve for  :

Since the equation of the numerators, here, , is true for all values of , pick a value for and use it to solve for .

As we have solved for the value of above, , we may use that value to solve for .

We may pick  , use  , and then solve for  :

We may pick  , Then solve for  :

We may pick  . Solve for  :

Hence,

or

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Asymptote</span> Limit of the tangent line at a point that tends to infinity

In analytic geometry, an asymptote of a curve is a line such that the distance between the curve and the line approaches zero as one or both of the x or y coordinates tends to infinity. In projective geometry and related contexts, an asymptote of a curve is a line which is tangent to the curve at a point at infinity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elementary algebra</span> Basic concepts of algebra

Elementary algebra, also known as high school algebra or college algebra, encompasses the basic concepts of algebra. It is often contrasted with arithmetic: arithmetic deals with specified numbers, whilst algebra introduces variables.

In mathematics, a polynomial is an expression consisting of indeterminates and coefficients, that involves only the operations of addition, subtraction, multiplication, and positive-integer powers of variables. An example of a polynomial of a single indeterminate x is x2 − 4x + 7. An example with three indeterminates is x3 + 2xyz2yz + 1.

In mathematics, a continued fraction is an expression obtained through an iterative process of representing a number as the sum of its integer part and the reciprocal of another number, then writing this other number as the sum of its integer part and another reciprocal, and so on. In a finite continued fraction, the iteration/recursion is terminated after finitely many steps by using an integer in lieu of another continued fraction. In contrast, an infinite continued fraction is an infinite expression. In either case, all integers in the sequence, other than the first, must be positive. The integers are called the coefficients or terms of the continued fraction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Factorization</span> (Mathematical) decomposition into a product

In mathematics, factorization (or factorisation, see English spelling differences) or factoring consists of writing a number or another mathematical object as a product of several factors, usually smaller or simpler objects of the same kind. For example, 3 × 5 is an integer factorization of 15, and (x – 2)(x + 2) is a polynomial factorization of x2 – 4.

In algebra, the partial fraction decomposition or partial fraction expansion of a rational fraction is an operation that consists of expressing the fraction as a sum of a polynomial and one or several fractions with a simpler denominator.

In mathematics, a quadratic irrational number is an irrational number that is the solution to some quadratic equation with rational coefficients which is irreducible over the rational numbers. Since fractions in the coefficients of a quadratic equation can be cleared by multiplying both sides by their least common denominator, a quadratic irrational is an irrational root of some quadratic equation with integer coefficients. The quadratic irrational numbers, a subset of the complex numbers, are algebraic numbers of degree 2, and can therefore be expressed as

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Egyptian fraction</span> Finite sum of distinct unit fractions

An Egyptian fraction is a finite sum of distinct unit fractions, such as

In mathematics, a rational function is any function that can be defined by a rational fraction, which is an algebraic fraction such that both the numerator and the denominator are polynomials. The coefficients of the polynomials need not be rational numbers; they may be taken in any field K. In this case, one speaks of a rational function and a rational fraction over K. The values of the variables may be taken in any field L containing K. Then the domain of the function is the set of the values of the variables for which the denominator is not zero, and the codomain is L.

In mathematics, the lowest common denominator or least common denominator is the lowest common multiple of the denominators of a set of fractions. It simplifies adding, subtracting, and comparing fractions.

In complex analysis, a branch of mathematics, a generalized continued fraction is a generalization of regular continued fractions in canonical form, in which the partial numerators and partial denominators can assume arbitrary complex values.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fraction</span> Ratio of two numbers

A fraction represents a part of a whole or, more generally, any number of equal parts. When spoken in everyday English, a fraction describes how many parts of a certain size there are, for example, one-half, eight-fifths, three-quarters. A common, vulgar, or simple fraction consists of an integer numerator, displayed above a line, and a non-zero integer denominator, displayed below that line. If these integers are positive, then the numerator represents a number of equal parts, and the denominator indicates how many of those parts make up a unit or a whole. For example, in the fraction 3/4, the numerator 3 indicates that the fraction represents 3 equal parts, and the denominator 4 indicates that 4 parts make up a whole. The picture to the right illustrates 3/4 of a cake.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Matrix calculus</span> Specialized notation for multivariable calculus

In mathematics, matrix calculus is a specialized notation for doing multivariable calculus, especially over spaces of matrices. It collects the various partial derivatives of a single function with respect to many variables, and/or of a multivariate function with respect to a single variable, into vectors and matrices that can be treated as single entities. This greatly simplifies operations such as finding the maximum or minimum of a multivariate function and solving systems of differential equations. The notation used here is commonly used in statistics and engineering, while the tensor index notation is preferred in physics.

In mathematics, specifically in elementary arithmetic and elementary algebra, given an equation between two fractions or rational expressions, one can cross-multiply to simplify the equation or determine the value of a variable.

In mathematics, the method of equating the coefficients is a way of solving a functional equation of two expressions such as polynomials for a number of unknown parameters. It relies on the fact that two expressions are identical precisely when corresponding coefficients are equal for each different type of term. The method is used to bring formulas into a desired form.

In mathematics, a quadratic equation is a polynomial equation of the second degree. The general form is

In algebra, an algebraic fraction is a fraction whose numerator and denominator are algebraic expressions. Two examples of algebraic fractions are and . Algebraic fractions are subject to the same laws as arithmetic fractions.

In the analytic theory of continued fractions, the convergence problem is the determination of conditions on the partial numeratorsai and partial denominatorsbi that are sufficient to guarantee the convergence of the continued fraction

In the analytic theory of continued fractions, Euler's continued fraction formula is an identity connecting a certain very general infinite series with an infinite continued fraction. First published in 1748, it was at first regarded as a simple identity connecting a finite sum with a finite continued fraction in such a way that the extension to the infinite case was immediately apparent. Today it is more fully appreciated as a useful tool in analytic attacks on the general convergence problem for infinite continued fractions with complex elements.

In elementary algebra, root rationalisation is a process by which radicals in the denominator of an algebraic fraction are eliminated.

References

  1. Calculus and Analytic Geometry 7th Edition, Thomas/Finney, 1988, pp. 482-489
  2. Zill, Dennis G.; Wright, Warren S. (2013). "Chapter 7: The Laplace Transform". Differential Equations with Boundary-Value Problems (8th ed.). Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning. pp. 287–88. ISBN   978-1-111-82706-9.
  3. Thomas, George B.; Weir, Maurice D.; Hass, Joel (2010). "Chapter 8: Techniques of Integration". Thomas's Calculus: Early Transcendentals (12th ed.). Addison-Wesley. pp. 476–78. ISBN   978-0-321-58876-0.
  4. Wiener, Joseph; Watkins, Will (Fall 1993 – Spring 1994). "Calculus to Algebra in Connection to Partial Fraction Decomposition". The AMATYC Review. 15 (1–2): 28–30.