Indian Health Transfer Policy

Last updated

The Canadian Indian Health Transfer Policy provides a framework for the assumption of control of health services by Indigenous peoples in Canada and set forth a developmental approach to transfer centred on the concept of self-determination in health. [1] Through this process, the decision to enter into transfer discussions with Health Canada rests with each community. Once involved in transfer, communities are able to take control of health program responsibilities at a pace determined by their individual circumstances and health management capabilities. [2]

Contents

Background

To put health transfer in context, it is useful to understand from a historical perspective how First Nations, Inuit, Métis and the Canadian federal government through Indian and Northern Affairs have worked together to respond to Indigenous peoples expressed desire to manage and control their own health programs.

1969 White Paper

The White Paper was a federal government policy paper which proposed to remove the status of treaty individuals under the Indian Act and to discontinue special services so identified, advocating the increased assimilation of Indigenous people into the culture of Canada. [3]

1970 Red Paper

The Red Paper was an Indigenous response to the White Paper emphasizing federal responsibility for health care for First Nations peoples and emphasizing plans to strengthen community control of their lives and of government-delivered community programs. [4]

1975 Indian Relationships Paper

The White and Red Papers served as an impetus for the collaborative effort of the federal government and Indigenous peoples to begin serious planning for the future. [4]

This resulted in the 1975 paper, The Canadian Government/The Canadian Indian Relationships, which defined a policy framework for strengthening the control of programs and services by Indigenous peoples. In the health sector, under contribution agreements 75 percent of the bands became responsible for such programs as the Native Alcohol and Drug Abuse Program and the Community Health Representative Program. [4]

1979 Indian Health Policy

The stated goal of the Indian Health Policy adopted by the federal government on September 19, 1979, was "to achieve an increasing level of health in Indian communities, generated and maintained by the Indian communities themselves". In this regard, the policy emphasized the historic responsibilities of both federal and provincial governments to provide health services to Indigenous peoples in Canada. It removed the issue of treaty rights from health policy considerations.

The policy reasoned that improvements to the health status of Indigenous peoples should be built on three pillars: (1) community development, both socio-economic and cultural/spiritual, to remove the conditions which limit the attainment of well-being; (2) the traditional trust relationship between Indian people and the federal government; and (3) the interrelated Canadian health system, with its federal, provincial, municipal, Indigenous and private sectors. [5]

A further important aspect of the new policy was the recognition that First Nation and Inuit communities could take over any or all aspects of the administration of their own community health programs, at their discretion and with the support of the Department of National Health and Welfare. [6]

1980 (Berger Report)

In 1980, a report of the Advisory Committee on Indian and Inuit Health Consultation was issued, known as the "Berger Report". It recommended methods of consultation that would ensure substantive participation by First Nations and Inuit in the design, management and control of health care services in their communities. [7]

1983 (Penner Report)

In 1983, the Report of the Special Committee on Indian Self-Government, known as the "Penner Report", recommended that the federal government establish a new relationship with First Nations and Inuit and that an essential element of this relationship be recognition of Indigenous self-government. The report identified health as a key area for takeover. [8]

1983–1986 Community Health Projects

Between 1983 and 1986, the First Nations and Inuit Health Branch sponsored demonstration projects for Indigenous peoples. The experiment was initiated to provide both federal and First Nations authorities with the same substantive information with respect to First Nations control of health services. [8]

1986 Sechelt Band Self-Government Act

The Sechelt Indian Band Self-Government Act was passed by Parliament in 1986. In April 1987, the British Columbia Legislative Assembly unanimously passed a bill to give the Sechelt community municipal status. Consequently, the Sechelt Indian Band signed the first self-government agreement in which a First Nations community assumed control of their health services. [9]

1988 Health Transfer south of the 60th parallel

In order for the First Nations and Inuit Health Branch to proceed with a health transfer to First Nations as part of administrative reform, the policy framework, authorities and resources had to be developed and secured. A subcommittee on the Transfer of Health Programs to Indian Control was established with representation from First Nations people with experience in health care. The subcommittee incorporated the experiences from the Community Health Projects and recommended a developmental and consultative approach for health transfer. These recommendations were then used to finalize the health transfer policy framework. [10]

On March 16, 1988, the Canadian Cabinet approved the health transfer policy framework for transferring resources for Indigenous health programs south of the 60th parallel to Indigenous control through a process which: [10]

1989 Treasury Board Authorities for Transfer

In 1989, the Treasury Board approved the financial authorities and resources to support pre-transfer planning and to fund community health management structures. [11]

Process

The process is designed to occur within the present funding base of federal health programs for First Nations, Inuit and Métis peoples. Communities are required to provide certain mandatory programs such as communicable disease control, environmental and occupational health and safety programs, and treatment services. [12]

Initially, the enthusiasm for this process was varied. For some, it was seen as an important link to self-government where the community plans and controls health programs in their communities according to its own priorities. It was seen as a way to develop programs relevant to a community's own cultural and social needs. Others took a more hesitant approach. As the uptake of control of health services by First Nations increased, the Indian Health Transfer Policy began to be seen increasingly by First Nations people as a stepping stone towards the inherent right of self-government. [5]

Transfer became the cornerstone of Health Canada's relationship with First Nations and Inuit communities. Health services transfer agreements between Health Canada and First Nation and Inuit provided the opportunity for communities or First Nations and Inuit organizations to manage their own health programs and services. At first, transfer was the only option communities had for increasing their control over health programs and services beyond contribution agreements. Although many communities were interested in assuming increased control over health services and programs, not all communities were ready to move into this level of control so quickly. It became increasingly apparent that one design could not fit all the diversity of readiness. Some communities expressed interest in alternative strategies which would also give them increased control of resources. [13]

Each year brought pressures for change and restructure in the transfer approach. The First Nations and Inuit Health Branch searched for ways to respond to communities desiring to increase their control of community resources, either through the transfer process, or through other initiatives. This movement was further supported by a decision of the Departmental Executive Committee of Health Canada on March 15, 1994, which directed the First Nations and Inuit Health Branch to commence planning all activities toward the following goals:

In further support the search for alternative pathways to transfer, in late 1994, the Treasury Board approved the "Integrated Community-Based Health Services Approach" as a second transfer option for communities to move into a limited level of control over health services. [15]

1995 saw the distribution and implementation of Pathways to First Nations Control Report of Project 07 Strategic Planning Exercise. This cornerstone document set the essential differences between the "Integrated Approach and Transfer". The "Integrated Approach" was an intermediate measure which provides more flexibility than Contribution Agreements, but less flexibility than the transfer agreement. [16]

In 1995, the federal government announced the Inherent Right to Self-Government policy. This policy recognizes First Nations and Inuit have the constitutional right to shape their own forms of government to suit their particular historical, cultural, political and economic circumstances. The policy thus introduced a third option for communities to further increase their control of health services. [17]

Self-governance gives bands more flexibility to establish program priorities in response to tribal needs rather than following federal program objectives. Bands are able to expand, consolidate and create new programs to improve services to their communities and to make certain laws governing their community with respect to health. Furthermore, the range of resources for health programs which can be included in a self-government arrangement is greater than those included in a Health Service Transfer arrangement and may eventually include fixed assets and services under the Non-Insured Health Benefits Program. [18] The flexibility in terms of how resources are allocated is also greater and reporting requirements are fewer. [19]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Indigenous peoples in Canada</span> Indigenous groups of Canada

Indigenous peoples in Canada comprise the First Nations, Inuit, and Métis. Although Indian is a term still commonly used in legal documents, the descriptors Indian and Eskimo have fallen into disuse in Canada, and many consider them to be pejorative. Aboriginal peoples as a collective noun is a specific term of art used in some legal documents, including the Constitution Act, 1982, though in most Indigenous circles Aboriginal has also fallen into disfavour.

First Nations is a term used to identify Indigenous peoples in Canada who are neither Inuit nor Métis. Traditionally, First Nations in Canada were peoples who lived south of the tree line, and mainly south of the Arctic Circle. There are 634 recognized First Nations governments or bands across Canada. Roughly half are located in the provinces of Ontario and British Columbia.

The minister of Crown–Indigenous relations is a minister of the Crown in the Canadian Cabinet, one of two ministers who administer Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada (CIRNAC), the department of the Government of Canada which is responsible for administering the Indian Act and other legislation dealing with "Indians and lands reserved for the Indians" under subsection 91(24) of the Constitution Act, 1867. The minister is also more broadly responsible for overall relations between the federal government and First Nations, Métis, and Inuit.

In Canada, an Indian reserve is defined by the Indian Act as a "tract of land, the legal title to which is vested in His Majesty, that has been set apart by His Majesty for the use and benefit of a band." Reserves are areas set aside for First Nations, one of the major groupings of Indigenous peoples in Canada, after a contract with the Canadian state, and are not to be confused with indigenous peoples' claims to ancestral lands under Aboriginal title.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Assembly of First Nations</span> First Nations organization in Canada

The Assembly of First Nations (AFN) is an assembly of Canadian First Nations represented by their chiefs. Established in 1982 and modelled on the United Nations General Assembly, it emerged from the National Indian Brotherhood, which dissolved in the late 1970s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Crown–Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada</span> Department of the government of Canada

Crown–Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada is the department of the Government of Canada responsible for Canada's northern lands and territories, and one of two departments with responsibility for policies relating to Indigenous peoples in Canada.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami</span> Canadian Inuit political organization

Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, previously known as the Inuit Tapirisat of Canada, is a nonprofit organization in Canada that represents over 65,000 Inuit across Inuit Nunangat and the rest of Canada. Their mission is to "serve as a national voice protecting and advancing the rights and interests of Inuit in Canada."

Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 provides constitutional protection to the indigenous and treaty rights of indigenous peoples in Canada. The section, while within the Constitution of Canada, falls outside the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The section does not define the term "aboriginal rights" or provide a closed list; some examples of the rights that section 35 has been found to protect are fishing, logging, hunting, the right to land and the right to enforcement of treaties. There remains a debate over whether the right to indigenous self-government is included within section 35. As of 2006 the Supreme Court of Canada has made no ruling on the matter. However, since 1995 the Government of Canada has had a policy recognizing the inherent right of self-government under section 35.

The Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples (RCAP) was a Canadian royal commission established in 1991 with the aim of investigating the relationship between Indigenous peoples in Canada, the Government of Canada, and Canadian society as a whole. It was launched in response to status and rights issues brought to light following events such as the Oka Crisis and the failure of the Meech Lake Accord. The commission culminated in a final report of 4,000 pages, published in 1996 and set out a 20-year agenda for implementing recommended changes.

Indigenous police services in Canada are police forces under the control of a First Nation or Inuit government.

In Canada, an Indian band or band, sometimes referred to as a First Nation band or simply a First Nation, is the basic unit of government for those peoples subject to the Indian Act. Bands are typically small groups of people: the largest in the country, the Six Nations of the Grand River First Nation had 22,294 members in September 2005, and many have a membership below 100 people. Each First Nation is typically represented by a band council chaired by an elected chief, and sometimes also a hereditary chief. As of 2013, there were 614 bands in Canada. Membership in a band is controlled in one of two ways: for most bands, membership is obtained by becoming listed on the Indian Register maintained by the government. As of 2013, there were 253 First Nations which had their own membership criteria, so that not all status Indians are members of a band.

The 1969 White Paper was a policy paper proposal set forth by the Government of Canada related to First Nations. Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau and his Minister of Indian Affairs, Jean Chrétien issued the paper in 1969. The White Paper proposed to abolish all legal documents that had previously existed, including the Indian Act, and all existing treaties within Canada, comprising Canadian Aboriginal law. It proposed to assimilate First Nations as an ethnic group equal to other Canadian citizens. The White Paper was met with widespread criticism and activism, causing the proposal to be officially withdrawn in 1970.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Canadian Aboriginal law</span> Canadian law regarding indigenous people

Canadian Aboriginal law is the body of law of Canada that concerns a variety of issues related to Indigenous peoples in Canada. Canadian Aboriginal Law is different from Canadian Indigenous law: In Canada, Indigenous Law refers to the legal traditions, customs, and practices of Indigenous peoples and groups. Aboriginal peoples as a collective noun is a specific term of art used in legal documents, including the Constitution Act, 1982, and includes First Nations, Inuit and Métis people. Canadian Aboriginal law provides certain constitutionally recognized rights to land and traditional practices. Canadian Aboriginal Law enforces and interprets certain treaties between the Crown and Indigenous people, and manages much of their interaction. A major area of Aboriginal law involves the duty to consult and accommodate.

The Ministry of Indigenous Affairs is the Government of Ontario ministry responsible for issues relating to First Nations, Métis and Inuit in Ontario. The current Minister of Indigenous Affairs is Hon. Greg Rickford who sits in the Executive Council of Ontario or cabinet.

Aboriginal child protection describes services designed specifically for protection of the children of "aboriginal" or indigenous peoples, particularly where these peoples are a minority within a country. They may differ at international, national, legal, cultural, social, professional and program levels from general or mainstream child protection services. Fundamental human rights are a source of many of the differences. Aboriginal child protection may be an integral or a distinct aspect of mainstream services or it may be exercised formally or informally by an aboriginal people itself. There has been controversy about systemic genocide in child protection systems enforced with aboriginal children in post-colonial societies.

The Sixties Scoop, also known as The Scoop, was a period in which a series of policies were enacted in Canada that enabled child welfare authorities to take, or "scoop up," Indigenous children from their families and communities for placement in foster homes, from which they would be adopted by white families. Despite its name referencing the 1960s, the Sixties Scoop began in the mid-to-late 1950s and persisted into the 1980s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Suicide in Canada</span>

According to the latest available data, Statistics Canada estimates 4,157 suicides took place in Canada in 2017, making it the 9th leading cause of death, between Alzheimer's disease (8th) and cirrhosis and other liver diseases (10th). In 2009, there were an estimated 3,890 suicide deaths.

Indigenous or Aboriginal self-government refers to proposals to give governments representing the Indigenous peoples in Canada greater powers of government. These proposals range from giving Aboriginal governments powers similar to that of local governments in Canada to demands that Indigenous governments be recognized as sovereign, and capable of "nation-to-nation" negotiations as legal equals to the Crown, as well as many other variations.

Indigenous peoples in Canada demand to have their land rights and their Aboriginal titles respected by the Canadian government. These outstanding land claims are some of the main political issues facing Indigenous peoples today.

Recognition and Implementation of Indigenous Rights Framework (RIIRF) is a legislation and policy initiative intended to be undertaken in "full partnership with First Nations, Inuit, and Métis Peoples" that was announced during a speech in the House of Commons of Canada by Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau on February 14, 2018. It was "meant to enshrine the Constitution's section 35, which affirms Aboriginal rights, in federal law, allowing First Nations to reconstitute their governance structures outside the Indian Act."

References

  1. ↑ Castro, Arachu; Singer, Merrill (2004). Unhealthy health policy: a critical anthropological examination. ISBN   9780759105119.{{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
  2. ↑ "Financing a First Nations and Inuit Integrated Health System" (PDF). Heallth Canada. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-01-11.
  3. ↑ "CANADIAN GOVERNMENT'S 1969 WHITE PAPER". Dr. Daniel N Paul, C.M., O.N.S., Hon.D.Litt.
  4. 1 2 3 Castile, George Pierre Taking Charge: Native American Self-Determination and Federal Indian Policy, 1975-1993 Tucson: The University of Arizona Press 168p, ISBN   0-8165-2542-0 Publication Date: September 2006
  5. 1 2 Waldram, James Burgess; Herring, Ann; Kue Young, T. (January 2006). Aboriginal health in Canada: historical, cultural, and epidemiological. ISBN   9780802085795.{{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
  6. ↑ Hogg, P. and M.E. Turpel. "Implementing Aboriginal Self-Government: Constitutional and Jurisdictional Issues." The Canadian Bar Review. Vol. 74, No. 2, June 1995, p. 187-2
  7. ↑ "Ten Years of Health Transfer First Nation and Inuit Control". Health Canada. Archived from the original on 2017-03-13.
  8. 1 2 "The Impact Of The Penner Report". Law Firm of Soonias and Pennington. Archived from the original on 2011-01-07. Retrieved 2009-09-28.
  9. ↑ "Sechelt Indian Band Self-Government Act, S.C. 1986, c. 27". Federation of Law Societies of Canada.
  10. 1 2 Cameron, K. and G. White. Northern Governments in Transition: Political and Constitutional Developments in the Yukon, Nunavut and the Western Northwest Territories. The Institute for Research on Public Policy, Montreal, 1995.
  11. ↑ Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples, Aboriginal Self-Government: Legal and Constitutional Issues. Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples, Ottawa, 1999
  12. ↑ "Funding - Reports and Publications". Health Canada.
  13. ↑ "Aboriginal Health & Cultural Diversity Glossary". usask. Archived from the original on 2009-10-24. Retrieved 2017-08-18.
  14. ↑ "Indian Health Policy 1979". Health Canada.
  15. ↑ Canada, Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development. Federal Policy Guide, Aboriginal Self-Government: The Government of Canada’s Approach to the Implementation of the Inherent Right and the Negotiation of Aboriginal Self-Government. Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, Ottawa, 199
  16. ↑ Canada. House of Commons Special Committee on Indian Self-Government. Second Report: Indian Self-Government in Canada. 1st Session, 32nd Parliament, Issue No. 40.
  17. ↑ Hamilton, A.C. A New Partnership: Report of the Honourable A.C. Hamilton, Fact Finder. Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, Ottawa, 1995.
  18. ↑ Green, Joyce. "Constitutionalising the Patriarchy: Aboriginal Women and Aboriginal Government." 4 Constitutional Forum 110, Summer 1993.
  19. ↑ Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, 1999-2000 Estimates, Part III – Report on Plans and Priorities, p. 11
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.