Convention on Biological Diversity

Last updated

Convention on Biological Diversity
Convention on Biological Diversity logo.svg
Type Multilateral environmental agreement
Context Environmentalism, Biodiversity conservation
Drafted22 May 1992 (1992-05-22)
Signed5 June 1992 – 4 June 1993
LocationRio de Janeiro, Brazil
New York, United States
Effective29 December 1993 (1993-12-29)
ConditionRatification by 30 States
Parties
Depositary Secretary-General of the United Nations
Languages
Full text
Wikisource-logo.svg United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity at Wikisource

The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), known informally as the Biodiversity Convention, is a multilateral treaty. The Convention has three main goals: the conservation of biological diversity (or biodiversity); the sustainable use of its components; and the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from genetic resources. Its objective is to develop national strategies for the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, and it is often seen as the key document regarding sustainable development.

Contents

The Convention was opened for signature at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro on 5 June 1992 and entered into force on 29 December 1993. The United States is the only UN member state which has not ratified the Convention. [1] It has two supplementary agreements, the Cartagena Protocol and Nagoya Protocol.

The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity is an international treaty governing the movements of living modified organisms (LMOs) resulting from modern biotechnology from one country to another. It was adopted on 29 January 2000 as a supplementary agreement to the CBD and entered into force on 11 September 2003.

The Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization (ABS) to the Convention on Biological Diversity is another supplementary agreement to the CBD. It provides a transparent legal framework for the effective implementation of one of the three objectives of the CBD: the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising out of the utilization of genetic resources. The Nagoya Protocol was adopted on 29 October 2010 in Nagoya, Japan, and entered into force on 12 October 2014.

2010 was also the International Year of Biodiversity, and the Secretariat of the CBD was its focal point. Following a recommendation of CBD signatories at Nagoya, the UN declared 2011 to 2020 as the United Nations Decade on Biodiversity in December 2010. The Convention's Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020, created in 2010, include the Aichi Biodiversity Targets.

The meetings of the Parties to the Convention are known as Conferences of the Parties (COP), with the first one (COP 1) held in Nassau, Bahamas, in 1994 and the most recent one (COP 15) in 2021/2022 in Kunming, China and Montreal, Canada. [2]

In the area of marine and coastal biodiversity CBD's focus at present is to identify Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas (EBSAs) in specific ocean locations based on scientific criteria. The aim is to create an international legally binding instrument (ILBI) involving area-based planning and decision-making under UNCLOS to support the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity beyond areas of national jurisdiction (BBNJ). [3]

Origin and scope

The notion of an international convention on biodiversity was conceived at a United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) Ad Hoc Working Group of Experts on Biological Diversity in November 1988. The subsequent year, the Ad Hoc Working Group of Technical and Legal Experts was established for the drafting of a legal text which addressed the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, as well as the sharing of benefits arising from their utilization with sovereign states and local communities. In 1991, an intergovernmental negotiating committee was established, tasked with finalizing the Convention's text. [4]

A Conference for the Adoption of the Agreed Text of the Convention on Biological Diversity was held in Nairobi, Kenya, in 1992, and its conclusions were distilled in the Nairobi Final Act. [5] The Convention's text was opened for signature on 5 June 1992 at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (the Rio "Earth Summit"). By its closing date, 4 June 1993, the Convention had received 168 signatures. It entered into force on 29 December 1993. [4]

The Convention recognized for the first time in international law that the conservation of biodiversity is "a common concern of humankind" and is an integral part of the development process. The agreement covers all ecosystems, species, and genetic resources. It links traditional conservation efforts to the economic goal of using biological resources sustainably. It sets principles for the fair and equitable sharing of the benefits arising from the use of genetic resources, notably those destined for commercial use. [6] It also covers the rapidly expanding field of biotechnology through its Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, addressing technology development and transfer, benefit-sharing and biosafety issues. Importantly, the Convention is legally binding; countries that join it ('Parties') are obliged to implement its provisions.

The Convention reminds decision-makers that natural resources are not infinite and sets out a philosophy of sustainable use. While past conservation efforts were aimed at protecting particular species and habitats, the Convention recognizes that ecosystems, species and genes must be used for the benefit of humans. However, this should be done in a way and at a rate that does not lead to the long-term decline of biological diversity.

The Convention also offers decision-makers guidance based on the precautionary principle which demands that where there is a threat of significant reduction or loss of biological diversity, lack of full scientific certainty should not be used as a reason for postponing measures to avoid or minimize such a threat. The Convention acknowledges that substantial investments are required to conserve biological diversity. It argues, however, that conservation will bring us significant environmental, economic and social benefits in return.

The Convention on Biological Diversity of 2010 banned some forms of geoengineering.

Executive secretary

As of 1 December 2019, the acting executive secretary is Elizabeth Maruma Mrema.[ citation needed ]

The previous executive secretaries were: pl:Cristiana Pașca Palmer (2017–2019), Braulio Ferreira de Souza Dias (2012–2017), Ahmed Djoghlaf (2006–2012), Hamdallah Zedan (1998–2005), Calestous Juma (1995–1998), and Angela Cropper (1993–1995).[ citation needed ]

Issues

Some of the many issues dealt with under the Convention include: [7]

International bodies established

Conference of the Parties (COP)

The Convention's governing body is the Conference of the Parties (COP), consisting of all governments (and regional economic integration organizations) that have ratified the treaty. This ultimate authority reviews progress under the Convention, identifies new priorities, and sets work plans for members. The COP can also make amendments to the Convention, create expert advisory bodies, review progress reports by member nations, and collaborate with other international organizations and agreements.[ citation needed ]

The Conference of the Parties uses expertise and support from several other bodies that are established by the Convention. In addition to committees or mechanisms established on an ad hoc basis, the main organs are:

CBD Secretariat

The CBD Secretariat, based in Montreal, Quebec, Canada, operates under UNEP, the United Nations Environment Programme. Its main functions are to organize meetings, draft documents, assist member governments in the implementation of the programme of work, coordinate with other international organizations, and collect and disseminate information.

Subsidiary Body for Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice (SBSTTA)

The SBSTTA is a committee composed of experts from member governments competent in relevant fields. It plays a key role in making recommendations to the COP on scientific and technical issues. It provides assessments of the status of biological diversity and of various measures taken in accordance with Convention, and also gives recommendations to the Conference of the Parties, which may be endorsed in whole, in part or in modified form by the COPs. As of 2020 SBSTTA had met 23 times, with a 24th meeting taking place in Geneva, Switzerland in 2022. [8]

Subsidiary Body on Implementation (SBI)

In 2014, the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity established the Subsidiary Body on Implementation (SBI) to replace the Ad Hoc Open-ended Working Group on Review of Implementation of the Convention. The four functions and core areas of work of SBI are: (a) review of progress in implementation; (b) strategic actions to enhance implementation; (c) strengthening means of implementation; and (d) operations of the Convention and the Protocols. The first meeting of the SBI was held on 2–6 May 2016 and the second meeting was held on 9–13 July 2018, both in Montreal, Canada. The third meeting of the SBI will be held in March 2022 in Geneva, Switzerland. [9] The Bureau of the Conference of the Parties serves as the Bureau of the SBI. The current chair of the SBI is Ms. Charlotta Sörqvist of Sweden.

Parties

.mw-parser-output .legend{page-break-inside:avoid;break-inside:avoid-column}.mw-parser-output .legend-color{display:inline-block;min-width:1.25em;height:1.25em;line-height:1.25;margin:1px 0;text-align:center;border:1px solid black;background-color:transparent;color:black}.mw-parser-output .legend-text{}
Parties to the convention
Signed, but not ratified
Non-signatory Convention on Biological Diversity2.svg
  Parties to the convention
  Signed, but not ratified
  Non-signatory

As of 2016, the Convention has 196 Parties, which includes 195 states and the European Union. [10] All UN member states—with the exception of the United States—have ratified the treaty. [11] Non-UN member states that have ratified are the Cook Islands, Niue, and the State of Palestine. The Holy See and the states with limited recognition are non-Parties. The US has signed but not ratified the treaty, [12] because ratification requires a two-thirds majority in the Senate and is blocked by Republican Party senators. [1]

The European Union created the Cartagena Protocol (see below) in 2000 to enhance biosafety regulation and propagate the "precautionary principle" over the "sound science principle" defended by the United States. Whereas the impact of the Cartagena Protocol on domestic regulations has been substantial, its impact on international trade law remains uncertain. In 2006, the World Trade Organization (WTO) ruled that the European Union had violated international trade law between 1999 and 2003 by imposing a moratorium on the approval of genetically modified organisms (GMO) imports. Disappointing the United States, the panel nevertheless "decided not to decide" by not invalidating the stringent European biosafety regulations. [13]

Implementation by the Parties to the Convention is achieved using two means:

National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans (NBSAP)

National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans (NBSAP) are the principal instruments for implementing the Convention at the national level. The Convention requires that countries prepare a national biodiversity strategy and to ensure that this strategy is included in planning for activities in all sectors where diversity may be impacted. As of early 2012, 173 Parties had developed NBSAPs. [14]

The United Kingdom, New Zealand and Tanzania carried out elaborate responses to conserve individual species and specific habitats. The United States of America, a signatory who had not yet ratified the treaty by 2010, [15] produced one of the most thorough implementation programs through species recovery programs and other mechanisms long in place in the US for species conservation. [16]

Singapore established a detailed National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan. [17] The National Biodiversity Centre of Singapore represents Singapore in the Convention for Biological Diversity. [18]

National Reports

In accordance with Article 26 of the Convention, Parties prepare national reports on the status of implementation of the Convention.

Protocols and plans developed by CBD

Cartagena Protocol (2000)

The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, also known as the Biosafety Protocol, was adopted in January 2000, after a CBD Open-ended Ad Hoc Working Group on Biosafety had met six times between July 1996 and February 1999. The Working Group submitted a draft text of the Protocol for consideration by Conference of the Parties at its first extraordinary meeting, which was convened for the express purpose of adopting a protocol on biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity. After a few delays, the Cartagena Protocol was eventually adopted on 29 January 2000. [19] The Biosafety Protocol seeks to protect biological diversity from the potential risks posed by living modified organisms resulting from modern biotechnology. [20] [21]

The Biosafety Protocol makes clear that products from new technologies must be based on the precautionary principle and allow developing nations to balance public health against economic benefits. It will, for example, let countries ban imports of a genetically modified organism if they feel there is not enough scientific evidence the product is safe and requires exporters to label shipments containing genetically modified commodities such as corn or cotton. [20]

The required number of 50 instruments of ratification/accession/approval/acceptance by countries was reached in May 2003. In accordance with the provisions of its Article 37, the Protocol entered into force on 11 September 2003. [22]

Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (2002)

In April 2002, the Parties of the UN CBD adopted the recommendations of the Gran Canaria Declaration Calling for a Global Plant Conservation Strategy, and adopted a 16-point plan aiming to slow the rate of plant extinctions around the world by 2010.[ citation needed ]

Nagoya Protocol (2010)

The Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity was adopted on 29 October 2010 in Nagoya, Aichi Prefecture, Japan, at the tenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties, [23] and entered into force on 12 October 2014. [24] The protocol is a supplementary agreement to the Convention on Biological Diversity, and provides a transparent legal framework for the effective implementation of one of the three objectives of the CBD: the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising out of the utilization of genetic resources. It thereby contributes to the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity. [23] [25]

Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020

Also at the tenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties, held from 18 to 29 October 2010 in Nagoya, [26] a revised and updated "Strategic Plan for Biodiversity, 2011-2020" was agreed and published. This document included the "Aichi Biodiversity Targets", comprising 20 targets that address each of five strategic goals defined in the plan. The strategic plan includes the following strategic goals: [27] [26]

Upon the launch of Agenda 2030, CBD released a technical note mapping and identifying synergies between the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the 20 Aichi Biodiversity Targets. [28] This helps to understand the contributions of biodiversity to achieving the SDGs.[ citation needed ]

Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework

A new plan, known as the post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) was developed to guide action through 2030. [29] A first draft of this framework was released in July 2021, [30] and its final content was discussed and negotiated as part of the COP 15 meetings. Reducing agricultural pollution and sharing the benefits of digital sequence information arose as key points of contention among Parties during development of the framework. [31] A final version was adopted by the Convention on 19 December 2022. [32] [33] The framework includes a number of ambitious goals, including a commitment to designate at least 30 percent of global land and sea as protected areas (known as the "30 by 30" initiative). [34]

Marine and coastal biodiversity

The CBD has a significant focus on marine and coastal biodiversity. [35]  A series of expert workshops have been held (2018–2022) to identify options for modifying the description of Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas (EBSAs) and describing new areas. [36] These have focused on the North-East, North-West and South-Eastern Atlantic Ocean, Baltic Sea, Caspian Sea, Black Sea, Seas of East Asia, North-West Indian Ocean and Adjacent Gulf Areas, Southern and North-East Indian Ocean, Mediterranean Sea, North and South Pacific, Eastern Tropical and Temperate Pacific, Wider Caribbean and Western Mid-Atlantic. The workshop meetings have followed the EBSA process based on internationally agreed scientific criteria. [37] [38] This is aimed at creating an international legally binding instrument (ILBI) under UNCLOS to support the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity beyond areas of national jurisdiction (BBNJ). [39] The central mechanism is area-based planning and decision-making. [40] It integrates EBSAs, Vulnerable Marine Ecosystems (VMEs) and High Seas (Marine Protected Areas) with Blue Growth scenarios. There is also linkage with the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive.

Criticism

There have been criticisms against CBD that its implementation has been weakened due to resistance of Western countries to the implementation of pro-South provisions of the Convention. [41] CBD is also regarded as a case of a hard treaty gone soft in the implementation trajectory. [42] The argument to enforce the treaty as a legally binding multilateral instrument with the Conference of Parties reviewing the infractions and non-compliance is also gaining strength. [43]

Although the Convention explicitly states that all forms of life are covered by its provisions, [44] examination of reports and of national biodiversity strategies and action plans submitted by participating countries shows that in practice this is not happening. The fifth report of the European Union, for example, makes frequent reference to animals (particularly fish) and plants, but does not mention bacteria, fungi or protists at all. [45] The International Society for Fungal Conservation has assessed more than 100 of these CBD documents for their coverage of fungi using defined criteria to place each in one of six categories. No documents were assessed as good or adequate, less than 10% as nearly adequate or poor, and the rest as deficient, seriously deficient or totally deficient. [46]

Scientists working with biodiversity and medical research are expressing fears that the Nagoya Protocol is counterproductive, and will hamper disease prevention and conservation efforts, [47] and that the threat of imprisonment of scientists will have a chilling effect on research. [48] Non-commercial researchers and institutions such as natural history museums fear maintaining biological reference collections and exchanging material between institutions will become difficult, [49] and medical researchers have expressed alarm at plans to expand the protocol to make it illegal to publicly share genetic information, e.g. via GenBank. [50]

William Yancey Brown, when with the Brookings Institution, suggested that the Convention on Biological Diversity should include the preservation of intact genomes and viable cells for every known species and for new species as they are discovered. [51]

Meetings of the Parties

A Conference of the Parties (COP) was held annually for three years after 1994, and thence biennially on even-numbered years.

1994 COP 1

The first ordinary meeting of the Parties to the Convention took place in November and December 1994, in Nassau, Bahamas. [52]

1995 COP 2

The second ordinary meeting of the Parties to the Convention took place in November 1995, in Jakarta, Indonesia. [53]

1996 COP 3

The third ordinary meeting of the Parties to the Convention took place in November 1996, in Buenos Aires, Argentina. [54]

1998 COP 4

The fourth ordinary meeting of the Parties to the Convention took place in May 1998, in Bratislava, Slovakia. [55]

1999 EX-COP 1 (Cartagena)

The First Extraordinary Meeting of the Conference of the Parties took place in February 1999, in Cartagena, Colombia. [56] A series of meetings led to the adoption of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety in January 2000, effective from 2003. [19]

2000 COP 5

The fifth ordinary meeting of the Parties to the Convention took place in May 2000, in Nairobi, Kenya. [57]

2002 COP 6

The sixth ordinary meeting of the Parties to the Convention took place in April 2002, in The Hague, Netherlands. [58]

2004 COP 7

The seventh ordinary meeting of the Parties to the Convention took place in February 2004, in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. [59]

2006 COP 8

The eighth ordinary meeting of the Parties to the Convention took place in March 2006, in Curitiba, Brazil. [60]

2008 COP 9

The ninth ordinary meeting of the Parties to the Convention took place in May 2008, in Bonn, Germany. [61]

2010 COP 10 (Nagoya)

The tenth ordinary meeting of the Parties to the Convention took place in October 2010, in Nagoya, Japan. [62] It was at this meeting that the Nagoya Protocol was ratified.

2010 was the International Year of Biodiversity and the Secretariat of the CBD was its focal point. Following a recommendation of CBD signatories during COP 10 at Nagoya, the UN, on 22 December 2010, declared 2011 to 2020 as the United Nations Decade on Biodiversity.[ citation needed ]

2012 COP 11

Leading up to the Conference of the Parties (COP 11) meeting on biodiversity in Hyderabad, India, 2012, preparations for a World Wide Views on Biodiversity has begun, involving old and new partners and building on the experiences from the World Wide Views on Global Warming. [63]

2014 COP 12

Under the theme, "Biodiversity for Sustainable Development", thousands of representatives of governments, NGOs, indigenous peoples, scientists and the private sector gathered in Pyeongchang, Republic of Korea in October 2014 for the 12th meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (COP 12). [64] [65]

From 6–17 October 2014, Parties discussed the implementation of the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020 and its Aichi Biodiversity Targets, which are to be achieved by the end of this decade. The results of Global Biodiversity Outlook 4, the flagship assessment report of the CBD informed the discussions.

The conference gave a mid-term evaluation to the UN Decade on Biodiversity (2011–2020) initiative, which aims to promote the conservation and sustainable use of nature. The meeting achieved a total of 35 decisions, [66] including a decision on "Mainstreaming gender considerations", to incorporate gender perspective to the analysis of biodiversity.

At the end of the meeting, the meeting adopted the "Pyeongchang Road Map", which addresses ways to achieve biodiversity through technology cooperation, funding and strengthening the capacity of developing countries. [67]

2016 COP 13

COP13 Mexico meeting COP13 Mexico conference.jpg
COP13 Mexico meeting

The thirteenth ordinary meeting of the Parties to the Convention took place between 2 and 17 December 2016 in Cancún, Mexico.

2018 COP 14

The 14th ordinary meeting of the Parties to the Convention took place on 17–29 November 2018, in Sharm El-Sheikh, Egypt. [68] The 2018 UN Biodiversity Conference closed on 29 November 2018 with broad international agreement on reversing the global destruction of nature and biodiversity loss threatening all forms of life on Earth. Parties adopted the Voluntary Guidelines for the design and effective implementation of ecosystem-based approaches to climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction. [69] [70] Governments also agreed to accelerate action to achieve the Aichi Biodiversity Targets, agreed in 2010, until 2020. Work to achieve these targets would take place at the global, regional, national and subnational levels.[ citation needed ]

2021/2022 COP 15

COP15 Canada meeting 22dec07-COP15-COP-opening-3185 (52549245229).jpg
COP15 Canada meeting

The 15th meeting of the Parties was originally scheduled to take place in Kunming, China in 2020, [71] but was postponed several times due to the COVID-19 pandemic. [72] After the start date was delayed for a third time, the Convention was split into two sessions. A mostly online event took place in October 2021, where over 100 nations signed the Kunming declaration on biodiversity. The theme of the declaration was "Ecological Civilization: Building a Shared Future for All Life on Earth". [73] [74] Twenty-one action-oriented draft targets were provisionally agreed in the October meeting, to be further discussed in the second session: an in-person event that was originally scheduled to start in April 2022, but was rescheduled to occur later in 2022. [75] [76] [77] [78] The second part of COP 15 ultimately took place in Montreal, Canada, from 5–17 December 2022. [79] At the meeting, the Parties to the Convention adopted a new action plan, the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. [34]

2024 COP 16

The 16th meeting of the Parties is scheduled to be held in Colombia in 2024. [80] Originally, Turkey was going to host it but after a series of earthquakes in February 2023 they had to withdraw. [81] [82]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety</span> 2003 international agreement on biosafety

The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity is an international agreement on biosafety as a supplement to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) effective since 2003. The Biosafety Protocol seeks to protect biological diversity from the potential risks posed by genetically modified organisms resulting from modern biotechnology.

The International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, is a comprehensive international agreement in harmony with the Convention on Biological Diversity, which aims at guaranteeing food security through the conservation, exchange and sustainable use of the world's plant genetic resources for food and agriculture (PGRFA), the fair and equitable benefit sharing arising from its use, as well as the recognition of farmers' rights. It was signed in 2001 in Madrid, and entered into force on 29 June 2004.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ramsar Convention</span> International treaty for the conservation and sustainable utilization of wetlands

The Ramsar Convention on Wetlands of International Importance Especially as Waterfowl Habitat is an international treaty for the conservation and sustainable use of Ramsar sites (wetlands). It is also known as the Convention on Wetlands. It is named after the city of Ramsar in Iran, where the convention was signed in 1971.

Rio Convention relates to the following three conventions, which were agreed at the Earth Summit held in Rio de Janeiro in June 1992.

Traditional knowledge (TK), indigenous knowledge (IK), folk knowledge, and local knowledge generally refer to knowledge systems embedded in the cultural traditions of regional, indigenous, or local communities.

The Biosafety Clearing-House is an international mechanism that exchanges information about the movement of genetically modified organisms, established under the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. It assists Parties to implement the protocol’s provisions and to facilitate sharing of information on, and experience with, living modified organisms. It further assists Parties and other stakeholders to make informed decisions regarding the importation or release of GMOs.

The ecosystem approach is a conceptual framework for resolving ecosystem issues. The idea is to protect and manage the environment through the use of scientific reasoning. Another point of the ecosystem approach is preserving the Earth and its inhabitants from potential harm or permanent damage to the planet itself. With the preservation and management of the planet through an ecosystem approach, the future monetary and planetary gain are the by-product of sustaining and/or increasing the capacity of that particular environment. This is possible as the ecosystem approach incorporates humans, the economy, and ecology to the solution of any given problem. The initial idea for an ecosystem approach would come to light during the second meeting at the Conference of the Parties (COP) it was the central topic in implementation and framework for the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), it would further elaborate on the ecosystem approach as using varies methodologies for solving complex issues.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Biodiversity Indicators Partnership</span>

The Biodiversity Indicators Partnership (BIP) brings together a host of international organizations working on indicator development, to provide the best available information on biodiversity trends to the global community. The Partnership was initially established to help monitor progress towards the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) 2010 Biodiversity target. However, since its establishment in 2006 the BIP has developed a strong identity not only within the CBD but with other Multilateral Environmental Agreements (MEAs), national and regional governments and other sectors. As a result, the Partnership will continue through international collaboration and cooperation to provide biodiversity indicator information and trends into the future.

The Green Development Initiative (GDI) aims to establish a new marketplace for sustainable landscape management. As a key first step it has established a Platform for Verified Conservation Areas (VCAs) which includes an online Registry, a Standard and a Toolkit The Standard is based on the objectives and approaches of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nagoya Protocol</span> Global treaty on biological diversity

The Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity, also known as the Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS) is a 2010 supplementary agreement to the 1992 Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). Its aim is the implementation of one of the three objectives of the CBD: the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising out of the utilization of genetic resources, thereby contributing to the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity. It sets out obligations for its contracting parties to take measures in relation to access to genetic resources, benefit-sharing and compliance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zakri Abdul Hamid</span> Malaysian academic

Tan Sri Zakri bin Abdul Hamid has had a distinguished career in science as a researcher, educator, administrator and diplomat.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Conference of the parties</span> Supreme governing body of an international convention

A conference of the parties is the supreme governing body of an international convention. It is composed of representatives of the member states of the convention and accredited observers. Scope of the COP is to review the "implementation of the Convention and any other legal instruments that the COP adopts and take decisions necessary to promote the effective implementation of the Convention".

An Access and Benefit Sharing Agreement (ABSA) is an agreement that defines the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from the use of genetic resources. ABSAs typically arise in relation to bioprospecting where indigenous knowledge is used to focus screening efforts for commercially valuable genetic and biochemical resources. ABSAs recognise that bioprospecting frequently relies on indigenous or traditional knowledge, and that people or communities who hold such knowledge are entitled to a share of benefits arising from its commercial utilization.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Plant genetic resources</span>

Plant genetic resources describe the variability within plants that comes from human and natural selection over millennia. Their intrinsic value mainly concerns agricultural crops.

Genetic resources means genetic material of actual or potential value where genetic material means any material of plant, animal, microbial or other origin containing functional units of heredity... Genetic resources thus refer to the part of genetic diversity that has or could have practical use, such as in plant breeding. The term was introduced by Otto Frankel and Erna Bennett for a technical conference on the exploration, utilization and conservation of plant genetic resources, organized by the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) and the International Biological Program (IBP), held in Rome, Italy, 18–26 September 1967.

Digital sequence information (DSI) is a placeholder term used in international policy fora, particularly the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), to refer to data derived from de-materialized genetic resources. The 2018 Ad Hoc Technical Expert Group on DSI reached consensus that the term was "not appropriate". Nevertheless, the term is generally agreed to include nucleic acid sequence data, and may be construed to include other data types derived from or linked to dematerialized genetic resources, including, for example, protein sequence data. The appropriateness and meaning of this term remain controversial as evidenced by its continued placeholder status, post the 15th Conference of the Parties to the CBD. DSI is crucial to research in a wide range of contexts, including public health, medicine, biodiversity, plant and animal breeding, and evolution research.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2022 United Nations Biodiversity Conference</span> COP 15 (Biodiversity)

The 2022 United Nations Biodiversity Conference of the Parties (COP15) to the UN Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) was a conference held in Montreal, Canada, which led to the international agreement to protect 30% of land and oceans by 2030 and the adoption of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework.

Other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs) are sites outside of protected areas that are governed and managed in ways that deliver the long-term in situ conservation of biodiversity. As of March 2023, 829 such sites have been reported to the World Database on Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures, managed by the UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre. OECMs cover 3,094,741 km2 (1,194,886 sq mi) of the Earth's surface, accounting for 2,716,531 km2 (1,048,858 sq mi) on land and 378,209 km2 (146,027 sq mi) in the ocean.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework</span>

The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) is an outcome of the 2022 United Nations Biodiversity Conference. Its tentative title had been the "Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework". The GBF was adopted by the 15th Conference of Parties (COP15) to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) on 19 December 2022. It has been promoted as a "Paris Agreement for Nature". It is one of a handful of agreements under the auspices of the CBD, and it is the most significant to date. It has been hailed as a "huge, historic moment" and a "major win for our planet and for all of humanity."

References

  1. 1 2 Jones, Benji (20 May 2021). "Why the US won't join the single most important treaty to protect nature". Vox. Retrieved 3 December 2021.
  2. "Convention on Biological Diversity". Convention on Biological Diversity. Retrieved 24 July 2022.
  3. Convention on Biological Diversity. "Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas (EBSAs)". CBD. Retrieved 21 October 2023.
  4. 1 2 "History of the Convention". Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (SCBD). Archived from the original on 4 December 2016. Retrieved 14 November 2016.
  5. Nairobi Final Act of the Conference for the adoption of the agreed text of the Convention on Biological Diversity Archived 13 June 2015 at the Wayback Machine , Heinrich, M. (2002). Handbook of the Convention on Biological Diversity: Edited by the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Earthscan, London, 2001. ISBN   9781853837371
  6. Louafi, Sélim; Morin, Jean-Frederic (2004). "International governance of biodiversity: Involving all the users of genetic resources (Gouvernance internationale de la biodiversité : impliquer tous les utilisateurs de ressources génétiques)". Institute for Sustainable Development and International Relations (Iddri). 5 (4). Retrieved 17 May 2022.
  7. "How the Convention on Biological Diversity promotes nature and human well-being" (PDF). www.cbd.int. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. 2000. Archived (PDF) from the original on 22 June 2020. Retrieved 15 July 2020.
  8. "Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice (SBSTTA)". Convention on Biological Diversity. Archived from the original on 22 September 2020. Retrieved 18 September 2020.
  9. "Subsidiary Body on Implementation". Convention on Biological Diversity. Retrieved 27 March 2022.
  10. "CBD List of Parties". Archived from the original on 24 January 2011. Retrieved 22 September 2009.
  11. Commentary, Gloria Dickie (25 December 2016). "The US is the only country that hasn't signed on to a key international agreement to save the planet". Quartz. Archived from the original on 20 July 2021. Retrieved 20 July 2021.
  12. Hazarika, Sanjoy (23 April 1995). "India Presses U.S. to Pass Biotic Treaty". The New York Times . p. 1.13.
  13. Schneider, Christina J.; Urpelainen, Johannes (March 2013). "Distributional Conflict Between Powerful States and International Treaty Ratification". International Studies Quarterly. 57 (1): 13–27. doi: 10.1111/isqu.12024 . S2CID   154699328.
  14. "National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans (NBSAPs)". Archived from the original on 18 March 2012. Retrieved 18 March 2012.
  15. Watts, Jonathan (27 October 2010). "Harrison Ford calls on US to ratify treaty on conservation". The Guardian . London. Archived from the original on 5 June 2016. Retrieved 11 December 2016.
  16. ""Grants Overview"" . Retrieved 24 November 2021.
  17. "Conserving our Biodiversity" (PDF). 6 June 2013. Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 June 2013.
  18. "National Biodiversity Centre". National Parks Board. Retrieved 27 March 2022.
  19. 1 2 "About the Protocol". Convention on Biological Diversity. Archived from the original on 28 October 2020. Retrieved 17 September 2020.
  20. 1 2 "Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity" (PDF). www.cbd.int. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. 2000. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 September 2020. Retrieved 15 July 2020.
  21. "The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety". Archived from the original on 7 December 2018. Retrieved 13 December 2018.
  22. "UNTC". Archived from the original on 5 March 2014. Retrieved 15 July 2020..
  23. 1 2 "Nagoya Protocol". Archived from the original on 21 May 2011. Retrieved 31 May 2011.
  24. "Text of the Nagoya Protocol". cbd.int. Convention on Biological Diversity. Archived from the original on 21 December 2011. Retrieved 16 January 2012.
  25. "About the Nagoya Protocol". 9 June 2015. Archived from the original on 29 November 2018. Retrieved 13 December 2018.
  26. 1 2 "Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020, including Aichi Biodiversity Targets". Convention on Biological Diversity. 21 January 2020. Archived from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 17 September 2020.
  27. "Aichi Biodiversity Targets". Convention on Biological Diversity. 11 May 2018. Archived from the original on 17 September 2020. Retrieved 17 September 2020. Brochure here Archived 28 October 2020 at the Wayback Machine . Note on Copyright, provided here Archived 23 September 2020 at the Wayback Machine : "All official texts, data and documents are in the public domain and may be freely downloaded, copied and printed provided no change to the content is introduced, and the source is acknowledged."
  28. BIODIVERSITY AND THE 2030 AGENDA FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT (PDF). Montreal: UN Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Archived (PDF) from the original on 30 June 2017.
  29. "A new global framework for managing nature through 2030: First detailed draft agreement debuts". Convention on Biological Diversity. Retrieved 27 March 2022.
  30. "First Draft of the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework" (PDF). Convention on Biological Diversity. CBD/WG2020/3/3. 5 July 2021. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 July 2021.
  31. "Pressure grows for deal to save nature at crunch talks in Geneva". the Guardian. 23 March 2022. Retrieved 27 March 2022.
  32. OPEN-ENDED WORKING GROUP ON THE POST-2020 GLOBAL BIODIVERSITY FRAMEWORK. "POST-2020 GLOBAL BIODIVERSITY FRAMEWORK" (PDF). cbd.int. Montreal: Convention on Biological Diversity. Retrieved 17 December 2022. The Open-ended Working Group on the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework 1. Recalls its recommendation 4/1 on the post-2020 global biodiversity framework; 2. Transmits the draft of the post-2020 global biodiversity framework, contained in the annex to this recommendation, which supersedes the annex to recommendation 4/1, to the Conference of the Parties for its consideration.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  33. Unit, Biosafety (8 May 2023). "Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework". www.cbd.int. Retrieved 3 June 2023.
  34. 1 2 "COP15: Nations Adopt Four Goals, 23 Targets for 2030 In Landmark UN Biodiversity Agreement". Convention on Biological Diversity. 19 December 2022. Retrieved 6 January 2023.
  35. Unit, Biosafety (23 June 2022). "Marine and Coastal Biodiversity". Convention on Biological Diversity. Retrieved 10 July 2022.
  36. "Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas (EBSAs)". Convention on Biological Diversity. Retrieved 10 July 2022.
  37. "Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas (EBSAs)". Convention on Biological Diversity. Retrieved 10 July 2022.
  38. Special Places in the Ocean : A Decade of Describing Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas (EBSAs) (PDF). ISBN   9789292257132. Archived (PDF) from the original on 28 October 2021. Retrieved 24 July 2022.{{cite book}}: |website= ignored (help)
  39. Nordquist, Myron H.; Long, Ronâan, eds. (2021). Marine biodiversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction. Leiden: Brill Nihoff. ISBN   978-90-04-42241-4. OCLC   1258393744.
  40. "EBSA – The Global Ocean Biodiversity Initiative" . Retrieved 10 July 2022.
  41. Faizi, S (2004) The Unmaking of a Treaty. Biodiversity 5(3) 2004
  42. Harrop, Stuart R.; Pritchard, Diana J. (May 2011). "A hard instrument goes soft: The implications of the Convention on Biological Diversity's current trajectory". Global Environmental Change. 21 (2): 474–480. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.014 . Retrieved 17 May 2022.
  43. Faizi, S (2012). "Putting the focus on enforceme" (PDF). Square Brackets. 7 (October): 18–19. Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 October 2012. Retrieved 17 May 2022.
  44. "Text of the CBD". cbd.int. Archived from the original on 31 August 2017. Retrieved 7 November 2014.
  45. "Fifth Report of the European Union to the Convention on Biological Diversity. June 2014" (PDF). cbd.int. Archived (PDF) from the original on 3 September 2015. Retrieved 7 November 2014.
  46. "The Micheli Guide to Fungal Conservation". fungal-conservation.org. Archived from the original on 19 February 2015. Retrieved 7 November 2014.
  47. Prathapan, K. Divakaran; Pethiyagoda, Rohan; Bawa, Kamaljit S.; Raven, Peter H.; Rajan, Priyadarsanan Dharma (2018). "When the cure kills—CBD limits biodiversity research". Science. 360 (6396): 1405–1406. Bibcode:2018Sci...360.1405P. doi:10.1126/science.aat9844. PMID   29954970. S2CID   206667464. Archived from the original on 28 November 2018. Retrieved 28 November 2018.
  48. Cressey, Daniel (2014). "Biopiracy ban stirs red-tape fears". Nature. 514 (7520): 14–15. Bibcode:2014Natur.514...14C. doi: 10.1038/514014a . PMID   25279894. S2CID   4457904.
  49. Watanabe, Myrna E. (1 June 2015). "The Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit SharingInternational treaty poses challenges for biological collections". BioScience. 65 (6): 543–550. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biv056 .
  50. Dos s. Ribeiro, Carolina; Koopmans, Marion P.; Haringhuizen, George B. (2018). "Threats to timely sharing of pathogen sequence data". Science. 362 (6413): 404–406. Bibcode:2018Sci...362..404D. doi:10.1126/science.aau5229. PMID   30361362. S2CID   53090678. Archived from the original on 28 November 2018. Retrieved 28 November 2018.
  51. Brown, William Y. (3 August 2011). "Invest in a DNA bank for all species". Nature. 476 (7361): 399. doi: 10.1038/476399a . PMID   21866143.
  52. "Meeting Documents". Archived from the original on 4 February 2015. Retrieved 4 February 2015.
  53. "Meeting Documents". Archived from the original on 4 February 2015. Retrieved 4 February 2015.
  54. "Meeting Documents". Archived from the original on 4 February 2015. Retrieved 4 February 2015.
  55. "Meeting Documents". Archived from the original on 4 February 2015. Retrieved 4 February 2015.
  56. "Meeting Documents: First Extraordinary Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity, 22-23 February 1999 - Cartagena, Colombia". Archived from the original on 4 February 2015. Retrieved 4 February 2015.
  57. "Meeting Documents". Archived from the original on 4 February 2015. Retrieved 4 February 2015.
  58. "Meeting Documents". Archived from the original on 4 February 2015. Retrieved 4 February 2015.
  59. "Meeting Documents". Archived from the original on 4 February 2015. Retrieved 4 February 2015.
  60. "Eighth Ordinary Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (COP 8)". Archived from the original on 17 December 2013. Retrieved 12 December 2013.
  61. "Welcome to COP 9". 20 January 2009. Archived from the original on 4 February 2015. Retrieved 4 February 2015.
  62. "Welcome to COP 10". Archived from the original on 4 December 2010. Retrieved 29 November 2010.
  63. "World Wide Views on Biodiversity". Archived from the original on 11 November 2017. Retrieved 19 December 2011.
  64. "U.N. COP12 in Pyeongchang Calls for Scaling Up Action Plan to Stem Biodiversity Loss". Society for the Protection of Nature in Lebanon. 6 October 2014. Retrieved 17 May 2022.
  65. "COP 2014 Pyeongchang". Convention on Biological Diversity. 23 October 2014. Retrieved 17 May 2022.
  66. "COP Decisions". Convention on Biological Diversity. Archived from the original on 31 October 2020. Retrieved 29 November 2020.
  67. "Governments meet in Republic of Korea to assess progress in implementing global Strategic Plan for Biodiversity" (PDF). Convention on Biological Diversity. 6 October 2014. Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 June 2015. Retrieved 17 May 2022.
  68. CBD Secretariat. "COP 14 - Fourteenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity". Conference of the Parties (COP). Archived from the original on 17 May 2019. Retrieved 8 April 2019.
  69. CBD/COP/DEC/14/5 Archived 9 September 2019 at the Wayback Machine , 30 November 2018.
  70. "Voluntary Guidelines" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 September 2019. Retrieved 4 September 2019.
  71. Greenfield, Patrick (19 March 2021). "UN's Kunming biodiversity summit delayed a second time - Covid pandemic continues to hamper plans for key gathering to agree targets on protecting nature". The Guardian. UK. Archived from the original on 20 August 2021.
  72. "Meeting Documents: Fifteenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity, Second quarter of 2021 - Kunming, China". CBD. Archived from the original on 17 September 2020. Retrieved 17 September 2020.
  73. Kiran Pandrey (13 October 2021). "Over 100 countries sign Kunming Declaration on biodiversity conservation". Down to Earth . Archived from the original on 20 October 2021. Retrieved 19 October 2021.
  74. Greenfield, Patrick (18 August 2021). "Major UN biodiversity summit delayed for third time due to pandemic - Cop15 negotiations to set this decade's targets on nature to be split into two, with face-to-face meetings delayed until 2022". The Guardian. UK. Archived from the original on 20 August 2021.
  75. "First Draft of Global Biodiversity Framework Identifies Four Goals for 2050". SDG Knowledge Hub. 15 July 2021. Retrieved 17 May 2022.
  76. Ma Jun (11 October 2021). "Cop26 must not overshadow Kunming: we need joint climate and biodiversity goals". The Guardian . Archived from the original on 19 October 2021. Retrieved 19 October 2021.
  77. Catrin Einhorn (14 October 2021). "The Most Important Global Meeting You've Probably Never Heard Of Is Now". The New York Times . Archived from the original on 19 October 2021. Retrieved 19 October 2021.
  78. IISD (14 March 2022). "UN Biodiversity Conference (CBD COP 15) (Part 2)". International Institute for Sustainable Development . Archived from the original on 19 October 2021. Retrieved 8 April 2022.
  79. "Montreal to host delayed Cop15 summit to halt 'alarming' global biodiversity loss". the Guardian. 21 June 2022. Retrieved 23 June 2022.
  80. "Colombia se postula para ser sede de la Cumbre de Biodiversidad más importante del mundo". Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible (in Spanish). Colombia. Retrieved 17 December 2023.
  81. "@unbiodiversity". Twitter. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
  82. Cooper, David. "Notification to Parties on 31 July 2023" (PDF). Convention on Biological Diversity. UNCBD. Retrieved 17 December 2023.

Further reading