Intempo

Last updated

Intempo
InTempo, Benidorm, Espana, 2014-07-02, DD 28.JPG
Intempo
Interactive map of Intempo
General information
StatusCompleted [1]
LocationVia Parque, Benidorm, Spain
Coordinates 38°32′17″N0°09′18″W / 38.5381°N 0.1549°W / 38.5381; -0.1549
Construction started2006
Completed2021
Cost £72,500,000
Height
Roof187 m (614 ft) [1]
Technical details
Floor count47 above ground
3 below ground
(55 floors total)[ clarification needed ]
Floor area36,000 m2 (390,000 sq ft) [2]
Design and construction
ArchitectsPérez-Guerras Arquitectos & Ingenieros [3]
DeveloperUNIQ Residential [1]
Structural engineerFlorentino Regalado [1]
Main contractor Dragados
Kono Estructuras [1]
Other information
Number of units256
References
[4]

Intempo is a 47-floor, 187-metre-high skyscraper in Benidorm, Spain. [1] [5] The design of the building was officially presented on 19 January 2006 and work began in 2007. Originally scheduled for completion in 2009, [6] work was significantly hampered by the economic crisis of 2008 which seriously affected the real estate sector in Spain. [7] Construction was almost completed in March 2014, [8] but the sponsor undertaking the project went into bankruptcy. In 2018, the building was acquired by SVP Global, and was fully finished by mid-2021. [9]

Contents

The building is the tallest in Benidorm and the fifth tallest in Spain.

Project

In 2005 a 92-million-euro loan was obtained from Caixa Bank to begin the tower's construction. The building's inauguration was initially scheduled for 2009, then rescheduled to 2011. [7]

The building project was initiated by the developer Olga Urbana, and the design was the work of the Alicante-based architecture firm Pérez-Guerras. The building plans were presented in 2006, and construction began in 2007. At that time, Spain was experiencing a real estate bubble, and completion was initially projected for mid-2010. However, due to the onset of the financial crisis and the emergence of numerous problems, both financial and technical, it was delayed for several years. Furthermore, several aspects of the initial design underwent modifications due to a lack of foresight, the innovative structural elements, and the complexity of the project. The structure was finally completed in March 2012. [10]

The original developer entered administration in 2014. The majority creditor then became the Sociedad de Gestión de Activos Procedentes de la Reestructuración Bancaria (Sareb), a public limited company managing assets from bank restructuring, or " bad bank," as the heir to the mortgage loan granted by the defunct savings bank Caixa Galicia. Sareb attempted to recover part of the loan through a full auction of the property after the developer's failed attempts to reach agreements with foreign investors. [11] In April 2018, SVP Global officially acquired ownership of the property through a payment in kind of approximately €60 million. [12] [13] The developer resumed construction in the autumn of 2019 [14] and it was completed in July 2021, fourteen years after it began. [15]

The skyscraper is notable for its peculiar geometric configuration consisting of two parallel straight towers, joined together by an inverted cone with an elliptical base at a height of 150 meters. The structure's fundamental characteristic is its very high slenderness. [16]

Building site

The building is located on Avenida de Colombia, in the Murtal district, an area colloquially and commonly known as Vía Parque. [17] It is situated at an altitude of 35 meters above sea level and approximately 500 meters in a straight line from Poniente Beach, an area with a lower residential density than Levante Beach. The site occupied by Intempo is part of the urban development plan approved in the 1950s. [18]

Architecture

Design

The building, which houses a total of 256 apartments, [19] consists of three basement levels plus 52 floors (including five technical floors) in two straight towers—separated by 20 meters—180 meters high above ground level, with a perimeter of 24.15 by 16.7 m (403.3 m² area). The towers are connected at both the first three floors (basements) and the top nine (floors 37 to 45) by an elliptical cone with its apex at the bottom, 30 meters high. [20] This peculiar geometry at the top means that the floor areas of both towers decrease with height, as the floor areas of the cone increase. [5]

The towers' structure is made of reinforced concrete, with the side walls left exposed, interrupted only by a small window on each floor for bathroom ventilation. The front façade is a discontinuous glass curtain wall with golden tones. [5] The façade underwent wind tunnel testing using a scale model and performed well, with the cone-shaped design effectively channeling the wind. [21]

The plot on which the building stands is 12,879 m², of which the Intempo building occupies 6,442 m². [22] The total built area is 36,223 m². [22] The structure of the blocks contains 90 tons of rolled steel and 2,200 tons of corrugated steel. [23] The concrete used in the towers amounts to 23,037 m³ and the floor slabs occupy an area of ​​43,000 m². [24] The concrete used is capable of withstanding a maximum of 50 MPa in the foundation, in the walls and the supports up to the 15th floor slab, which is reduced to 40 or 30 MPa in the slabs of the upper floors. [5] Due to the building's high slenderness ratio, the floor plan configuration of the apartments, and the small size of the vertical circulation cores, the overall rigidity or indestructibility is explained by both the cantilever effect (lateral shear walls) and the frame effect, developed through the floor slabs, as well as by the stiffening belts located on the four upper technical floors. [5] According to data from the study carried out by Florentino & Regalado, the cantilever effect contributes 50% to the structure's solidity, the frame effect 37%, and finally, the stiffening belts 13%. [25]

Height

It is the tallest building in the city of Benidorm (surpassing the Gran Hotel Bali), the tallest in Spain outside Madrid, one of the tallest in the world in a city of less than 100,000 inhabitants, the tallest residential structure in Spain, and the tallest residential building in the European Union. [10] Initially, the building's height was 187 meters above ground level [1] but after its completion in 2021, a new floor slab was added, reaching a height of 202.50 m. [26] This height is still pending approval by the CTBUH. [27]

Structure

The building consists of two parallel towers separated by a gap of 20 metres (66 ft) and connected by a cone-shaped structure between floors 38 and 44. Its frontal view, vaguely resembling the number 11 and the letter M, has led commentators to speculate about a possible reference to the terrorist attacks of 11 March 2004 in Madrid. It is one of the few skyscrapers in the world which has the shape of an arch (another in Europe being the Grande Arche in Paris). The façade of the building is of glass, a first for a residential building in Benidorm.[ citation needed ]

Preliminary designs

According to initial renderings of the building, a continuous curtain wall was planned for the front façade (it would have been the first building in Benidorm with this feature), [28] but this idea was ultimately discarded, and transparent glass railings were installed on the terraces to leave them open. Similarly, the cone was originally intended to be a smooth, circular pyramid, but it was ultimately given a stepped configuration. [29] Regarding the elevators, the architect's initial idea was to install a model that did not require a machine room, a common feature in 20-story buildings, but unfeasible for this skyscraper. [30] This deficiency, noted by the construction company Kono, was remedied by adding an extra floor slab—number 56—consisting of two small coffers on either side to house the elevator machine room, which are not visible in the original plans or in the developer's promotional images. [29] [31]

Facilities

Location of Intempo on Poniente beach in Benidorm. Mapa de Intempo en Playa Poniente.JPG
Location of Intempo on Poniente beach in Benidorm.

From the 38th floor upwards, the features of the apartments will be adaptable to the owner's needs. [23] Outside, it will have two swimming pools —one semi-Olympic and one for children— landscaped and recreational areas, a solarium, and sports facilities with a spa, gym, and sauna. [23] [32] The building has three basement levels with a total of 389 parking spaces, as well as storage rooms and lockers. [22]

The slight incline at the entrance is overcome by a staircase, with a row of palm trees on either side, and a small panoramic elevator. The building's apartments are accessible by a total of six elevators, three per tower (two standard elevators and one freight elevator). [33] The elevators are capable of ascending from the third basement level to the 45th floor in 55 seconds, [34] at a speed of 4.2 meters per second, making them the fastest in a residential development in Spain. [35]

Elevators controversy

In August 2013, the US edition of the blog Gizmodo published the false claim that the building's architects had not taken into account the elevator shaft. [36] The story was subsequently picked up by numerous media outlets, both national and international. [a]

The misunderstanding originated in a news article in the Spanish newspaper El País on July 20, 2013, which discussed the construction of the Intempo building, plagued by business and financial problems, and even accidents, against the backdrop of the Spanish real estate crisis. [55] The article stated that "the elevator shaft had not been taken into account," referring to the space that houses the elevator machinery. This sentence is what triggered the whole thing. [55]

The first media outlet to question the veracity of the news was the technology blog Microsiervos, [56] providing, among other evidence, links to the building plans that clearly showed the shafts for the two elevators and the freight elevator for each tower, and even photos of the enormous elevator control panel found on the blog of a journalist who had climbed to the top of the building. [57] The rumor was quickly denied by those responsible for the project, via Twitter and local radio, [58] [59] [33] and even by Sareb. [60]

History

A sales booth behind the building site InTempo 06.jpg
A sales booth behind the building site
The finished underground levels and the foundations of the towers. Below, some brown buildings, the Coblanca complex, can be seen; in the background, located on Via Parque, are the residential complexes Terrazas de Benidorm, Sol de Poniente, Miragolf, and Islamar. Intempo inicio obras.jpg
The finished underground levels and the foundations of the towers. Below, some brown buildings, the Coblanca complex, can be seen; in the background, located on Vía Parque, are the residential complexes Terrazas de Benidorm, Sol de Poniente, Miragolf, and Islamar.
The tower cone In Tempo 3.JPG
The tower cone
The cone visiboe from below Intempo desde abajo.jpg
The cone visiboe from below
the tower seen from the Playa de Poniente Intempo finished beach.jpg
the tower seen from the Playa de Poniente

The construction of the project was accompanied by numerous setbacks, which caused the opening date, initially planned for mid-2010 and with a construction period of 40 months, to be postponed several times. [61] The project was presented on January 19, 2006, [61] [62] ​ and construction work began on May 2, 2007. [63]

Origin of the design

The building was designed by the Alicante-based architecture studio Pérez-Guerras, with the collaboration of the Benidorm-based studio Olcina & Radúan Arquitectos and the concrete structure by Florentino Regalado & Asociados. [64]

Some sources, when the initial designs were presented, saw in the design a tribute to the victims of the March 11, 2004 attacks, known by the numeronym 11-M, as the towers could be interpreted as two facing ones forming the letter 'M'. [62] [65] [66] [63] The architect explained that it was not his intention to create a tribute, but that he "doesn't dislike the idea at all." He added that when he designed Intempo, "little had passed since the attack, and I was very aware of it because I entered a competition to build a monument in the same area as the attack, but I only received an honorable mention." [67] Indeed, at the end of 2004, a few months after the attacks took place, the Pérez-Guerras architecture studio received a runner-up prize of 6,000 euros in the competition to design the monument in homage to the victims of 11-M located in front of the Atocha station. [68]

Financing

The developer of the property is Olga Urbana SL, a company founded by three individuals in 2004 [b] with an initial share capital of just 3,100 euros. In 2005, Caixa Galicia granted it a loan of 93 million euros for construction, secured by a real estate mortgage. [69] It was later revealed that the developing partners contributed a total of seven million euros. [70] That year, Caixa Galicia closed the fiscal year with a profit of 212.3 million euros—almost double that of 2004—and allocated almost 20 billion euros to loan investments, 35% more than the previous year. [71]

Due to the bankruptcy of Caixa Galicia, the mortgage loan, amounting to 92 million euros, was initially assumed by Nova Caixa Galicia, and finally in December 2012, Sareb, a bad bank, took it over through a stake of approximately 52 million euros, [55] absorbing a 50% debt reduction, [72] not taking into account the subsequent 11 million euro surcharge applied to the debt. [73] 55% of Sareb's capital is privately held, while the remaining 45% is held by the Fund for Orderly Bank Restructuring (FROB). [74]

Construction

The site in June 2010 Intempo construccion.jpg
The site in June 2010
The change in color of the concrete can be observed from the 11th floor onwards due to the change between construction companies. InTempo 08.jpg
The change in color of the concrete can be observed from the 11th floor onwards due to the change between construction companies.

Olga Urbana acquired the land on which the skyscraper would be built from Aurelio González Villarejo in 2005 for 54.3 million euros, as recorded in a public deed. [75] Some sources stated that the costs associated with the project had initially been estimated at between 45 and 50 million euros, [76] [77] however, when the project was actually presented in 2005, they were valued at 96 million euros. [78]

In February 2007, site preparation work began for the foundations, consisting of excavations and the construction of retaining walls to prevent landslides. [79] Between July 2007 and March 2008, the three basement levels for parking were constructed, leaving a central void for the towers. In the garage area, separated from the tower structure, waffle slabs with reusable coffers or formwork panels 35 cm thick were used (to reduce weight and allow for greater spans between columns), along with solid slabs of the same thickness in areas that would support the earth fill. [5]

The building sits on a nine-meter-thick layer of weathered marl, measured from the third basement level. This marl was sufficient to support the loads of the garage area, which were addressed with isolated footings; however, it was not capable of withstanding the demands placed on the towers. [5] Therefore, a foundation was chosen based on the installation of a total of 144 piles, 1500 mm in diameter and 12 meters deep, reaching a depth of one meter in sound limestone bedrock. These piles were connected by a 2.5-meter-thick pile cap slab. [25] The reinforcement of the pile cap slab took place in September 2008, leaving a space for the elevator shaft. [79] The piloting was carried out simultaneously with the construction of the garage basements between November 2007 and April 2008. [79]

On September 30, more than 4,000 cubic meters of concrete were poured into the foundation slab of one of the two blocks, to cover almost 744,000 kilograms of steel. [24] Two pumps were used, plus a third in reserve, and a concrete mixer truck was poured every 5 minutes in a process that lasted eighteen hours. [80] From June to November 2009, the first eleven floors (up to the 17th floor) were built using a climbing formwork system. From March 2010 to April 2011, the remaining floors (up to the 47th floor) were completed. [79]

In July 2011, the two buildings were joined in two phases. [81] [82] First, a 5.5-meter cantilever was installed on floor slab 46 at a height of 143.5 meters on both sides of the tower, requiring the construction of auxiliary metal platforms on the floor slab immediately below. [25] This cantilever provided a base on which to support the lower floor slab of the cone. Second, two parallel metal trusses, each with a 20-meter span and an 8-meter depth (two stories) and weighing 110 tons, were installed on each tower. [25] Due to their weight, the trusses were surface-welded and then lifted into place. [82] They form the base of the cone upon which the upper floors are built. A metal truss and waffle slab were chosen to reduce weight. [25] The cone structure features two types of supported pillars, some straight and others that follow the cone's generatrix, responsible for supporting the weight of the floor slabs. [25]

The inverted cone located in the central part of the building was completed in June 2012, and the flag-raising ceremony finally took place on July 15, 2012, once the structure was complete, ten months behind the planned date of September 2011. [30] The two cranes, each about 200 meters tall, were removed in June 2014. [83]

Bankruptcy of the construction company

In July 2009, due to the financial crisis, the construction company, Estructuras Aliben, filed for a temporary workforce reduction plan (ERE) affecting ninety-nine of its one hundred employees. It subsequently filed for bankruptcy and was eventually liquidated, resulting in the suspension of construction for months. [84] Estructuras Aliben, subcontracted by the Madrid-based company Construcciones Rayet, [85] was hired at the insistence of the Galician savings bank. Later, they decided to terminate the contract, which involved paying compensation of 600,000 euros. [86]

In March 2010, a new company, Kono Estructuras [87] with its registered office in Benidorm, [88] was established and construction work resumed from the 11th floor (floor 17). This company committed to completing the work within eighteen months. [89] In April 2011, when the building already had 46 floors, the plans for the 47th floor were still not available. [11]

On June 24, 2011, thirteen workers were injured when a freight elevator fell from the tenth floor, [90] [91] [92] but there were no further consequences because the emergency braking system activated in time. [93] The freight elevator had been inspected that morning by several technicians and had been operating without problems throughout the day. [94]

Resignation of the architects

In June 2013, the architectural firms in charge of managing the construction, Pérez-Guerras Ingenieros y Arquitectos Asociados SL and Olcina y Raduan Arquitectos SL, withdrew from the project when approximately 20% of it remained to be completed. [95] According to municipal and developer sources (the architects declined to comment), their withdrawal stemmed from the loss of the necessary trust between client and architect after Sareb imposed financial control of the project on the developer, handing it over to an external project management company called Suasor. [96] They criticized Suasor's decisions, arguing they were driven by economic considerations and believed that the building's structural safety, quality, and future maintenance could no longer be guaranteed, nor could the high standards of the original design be implemented. [97] Suasor received a fixed monthly fee for its services, calculated as a percentage of the savings achieved. [69] This company refused to pay Kono Estructuras, the company responsible for erecting the Intempo structure, over one million euros in outstanding payments for materials, labor, and certifications, [89] and Kono was forced to cease operations. [98] In protest, in 2015, the construction company Kono released a preview of a documentary detailing all the deficiencies the project experienced during construction. [99] Kono reported frequent delays in payments to workers or complete suspension of payments if workers did not have their salaries deposited directly with the lending institution, [29] and they also had to advance money to purchase the materials needed to complete the work. [100]

The remaining 17% was handled by Pablo Moreno Arquitectos Asociados, as stated in the communication from the Alicante Territorial Association of Architects to the Benidorm City Council. [95] In August 2013, in an official statement, the project architects acknowledged that the project was economically unfeasible from the outset. Furthermore, according to the project's technical director, Roberto Pérez-Guerras, the final settlement with Kono was signed on July 3, thus ending the relationship between the two companies, reiterating that there was no outstanding debt to said company. [30] Finally, the architect clarified that the variation in the floor slabs of the elevator booths was due to a change in the elevator supplier. They stated that "it is obvious that by changing suppliers, replacing Orona elevators with the international and prestigious KONE, there would be a minimal change in the height of the floor slabs," [30] and regretted that the Intempo "could not be completed under the initially approved conditions." [97] [101] In August 2013, according to the developers, 94% of the work had been completed. [72] [102]

In mid-2013, investment groups from Russia, the United Arab Emirates, and Sri Lanka expressed interest in acquiring shares in Olga Urbana. In 2014, it was claimed that Trinitario Casanova, owner of Grupo Hispania, had begun negotiations to acquire the building. [103] In September 2015, a Saudi investor expressed interest in acquiring the building. [104] [105] Meanwhile, Roberto Pérez-Guerras, the designer of Intempo, claimed to have initiated talks with more than fifteen potential buyers, both Spanish and foreign. [106] However, the reality is that the negotiations were left to Sareb (the Spanish asset management company) and were conducted in strict secrecy. [107]

Olga Urbana's Contest

In 2012, José Ignacio de la Serna de la Garma, the majority shareholder of Olga Urbana, was sued for alleged fraud and misappropriation by a buyer who had made down payments totaling €80,000 with the developer's guarantee that these payments were backed by a financial institution. [108] For similar reasons, the developer was also sued by three buyers who had made down payments as deposits. [66] When the apartments were not delivered, they demanded the return of the guarantees, which were not refunded. In April 2014, a hearing was held, which De la Serna did not attend, but another of the three developers, Ignacio Boronat, did. He admitted to the judge that the bank guarantees did not exist and that the money paid by the buyers was used for the construction of the building. [108] Because De la Serna failed to appear in court, a Benidorm court ordered his arrest so he could testify as a suspect. [109] In February 2015, after a long battle with cancer, De la Serna died without seeing his biggest project completed. [110] [111] In addition to Intempo, he promoted several projects in the area, such as Neguri Gane, a 145-meter skyscraper also in Benidorm, completed in 2002. [112] In October 2015, a court ruling declared the clauses established by Caixa Galicia limiting the amount of the guarantee null and void, holding Abanca responsible as its successor. [113]

On November 6, 2014, Sareb requested that the Provincial Court of Alicante place Olga Urbana into compulsory insolvency proceedings. [114] [115] As early as 2008, the last year in which it filed annual accounts, the developer had accumulated losses of €4.06 million and a debt to banks of €62.75 million. [71] Sareb made this decision due to the company's insolvency, which was evidenced by its widespread payment defaults and its inability to finance the construction of the Intempo building on its own. [114] Finally, on November 26, 2014, the developer Olga Urbana SL officially filed for insolvency proceedings, as recorded in the Official State Gazette [116] and the Official Gazette of the Mercantile Registry (BORME). [117] This meant that their powers of administration and disposal were suspended, and the lawyer Antonia Magdaleno Carmona was appointed as insolvency administrator. [118] She belonged to the law firm that handled the liquidations of Martinsa Fadesa, among others. [119] In an official communication, she gave a one-month deadline for the debts to be reported to her in accordance with the Insolvency Law. [120] From the accounting records, the insolvency administration indicated that the developer owed 136 million, 42 million more than the value of its assets, which, in addition to Intempo, included the Edimar IX development, valued at 3.3 million. [121]

As of March 28, 2015, the bankruptcy administration noted that a total of 77 buyers who had paid advances for the purchase of Intempo homes had still not claimed their debts, [122] that the company had eleven current accounts in four banks, all with zero balances, and that the company's cooperation had been nonexistent. [122] Furthermore, it was suspected "whether the 130 million euros in financing received by Olga Urbana was used entirely for the construction of the building or whether part of it may have been diverted to other purposes." [123] In Magdaleno's words, "the company hasn't even appeared in the bankruptcy proceedings, the registered offices don't exist, and the only documentation I've had access to is what I was able to get at a sales office and little else. If you add to that the fact that the company has been closed in the Commercial Registry for failing to file accounts for years, it already gives you an indication of how it has been managed." [123]

Olga Urbana's largest creditor was Sareb, with €108 million, of which €82 million were classified as having special privilege due to a real estate mortgage and €7.6 million corresponded to interest. [124] Sabadell, with €6.8 million, and Abanca (successor to NCG), with €4.1 million, were also listed as creditors. [124] The remaining creditors were mostly companies that worked on the construction of the skyscraper and homebuyers who made advance payments, including both Spanish and foreign nationals. [124] The building's architect, Roberto Pérez-Guerras, was also owed €120,000 in fees. [98] Estructuras Kono sued Sareb, requesting the judge overseeing Olga Urbana's bankruptcy proceedings to convert Sareb's privileged claims into subordinated claims. They argued that Sareb had effectively acted as the de facto administrator of the bankrupt company, and that from the outset, both the financial institution and Sareb had imposed binding conditions. [86] In this way, the remaining creditors could access a portion of the proceeds from the sale of Intempo. Otherwise, the entire amount obtained from the building in any eventual sale (or auction) would go to the semi-public company, leaving even the bankruptcy administrators unpaid. [86]

Auction

The building's structure and walls are complete, as are the electrical and plumbing installations, but some details remain to be finished, such as the exterior landscaping (gardens and swimming pool), interior partitions, and tiling on some floors. [22] [83] [125] [126] As of May 2016, the project is stalled due to lack of funds, and its apartments are unoccupied. [22]

In April 2014, Sareb decided not to foreclose on the mortgage against Intempo, even though it could contractually do so. [127] The deadline for Olga Urbana to repay the loan expired on January 31 of that year. [127] At that time, Sareb's initial intention was to complete the building, [127] and it invested 11 million euros for this purpose. [98] The developer presented a cost study in mid-2014 to complete the final phase of urbanization, estimated at three million euros. [22] By April 2014, the only solution considered for canceling the mortgage was the sale of the entire building to an investment group, without the possibility of individual apartment purchases by private individuals. [128] Regarding any buyer who paid capital at the beginning of the project, it is not expected that they will be able to keep their apartment. [128]

Finally, on December 4, 2015, Sareb decided that the building would be put up for public auction without a starting price. [107] [129] The decision to sell it in its entirety, rather than by individual units or apartments, was justified by the fact that the construction was not fully completed. [129] The court order approving the plan proposed by the bankruptcy administration included the possibility of transferring the building to the so-called "preferred" creditors in lieu of payment if there were no offers or if the offers were lower than the amount owed to that creditor. [130] [131] Interested parties had to pay 1% of the property's value in advance through a deposit or bank guarantee. One month after the plan's approval, on January 4, the three-month period for submitting proposals began, extendable for another three months. [106] If offers are received for an amount lower than the privilege, creditors with special privilege—primarily Sareb—will be granted a period of ten business days to improve their offer; and if no offers are received, privileged creditors will also be granted a period of ten business days for the adjudication of the asset in payment of the debt. [129]

Its market value amounts to approximately 92 million euros, [132] and the apartments in the building have a price that, according to an appraisal carried out by UVE Valoraciones, would range between 190,990.8 euros and 1.6 million euros. [124] An independent expert study by APUC Activos concluded that the Intempo will hardly be able to be sold for more than 60 million euros, also taking into account that the completion costs of the skyscraper are around five million euros. [133] [134]

In May 2016, two offers were received, one for €47 million and another for €58.5 million (it was revealed in August that Sareb itself was bidding, exercising its right to improve the offer [98] ). [135] A US fund offered €50 million, but it did so after the deadline and its offer was rejected. [98] The trial in the insolvency proceedings involving the developer of Intempo, which was scheduled for June 2016, was postponed until October 28 of the same year. [98] [136]

Bankruptcy incident and temporary suspension

In August 2016, Isidro Boronat, a partner in Olga Urbana, along with Kono Estructuras SL, the company that built the skyscraper's structure, and Pérez Guerras Ingenieros y Arquitectos, the firm of the architect who designed it, filed a bankruptcy incident to have Sareb's debt considered subordinated. [137] The plaintiffs sought to ensure that the "bad bank" (Sareb) would be the last to be paid and could not exercise its right of first refusal in the bidding for the building, arguing that it had effectively managed Olga Urbana SL. [137] On February 17, 2017, the ruling of the Commercial Court of Alicante was made public, dismissing the lawsuit filed by small creditors of the building's developer (Kono Estructuras, Pérez Guerras, among others), siding with Sareb and finding that it had never acted as the administrator of Olga Urbana. [138] Therefore, their bankruptcy claim will retain its privileged status, unless the plaintiffs decide to appeal the judgment. [139] Until the bankruptcy proceedings, which had suspended the property adjudication process, were completed, Sareb would not acquire the property. [140] [141]

On November 6, 2017, the acquisition by Strategic Value Partners (SVP Global) of the mortgage loan encumbering the property for 60 million euros was announced. [142] Sareb thus obtained a capital gain of approximately 10 million euros. [143] On November 7, the Provincial Court of Alicante (which was due to issue its ruling on November 30) announced that the creditors had filed a motion withdrawing their appeal and Sareb had filed a motion agreeing to the terms, thus concluding the proceedings and closing the case. [144]

In April 2018, SVP Global officially acquired ownership of the property through a dation in payment, paying over €60 million. [13] The exact amount has not been made public. [13] An investment of approximately €5 million was reported to complete the construction within an expected timeframe of 12 months. Marketing in Spain and abroad was anticipated to begin around June 2018. [12] [13]

In June 2018, the property development company Olga Urbana was dissolved following the completion of its liquidation phase. [145] The bankruptcy proceedings were declared fraudulent, and the heirs of José Ignacio de la Serna were ordered to pay €17.6 million to Olga Urbana's creditors. However, De la Serna's heir renounced the inheritance. [146]

Second attempt: design changes

In December 2018, SVP contracted the services of the Catalan developer Uniq Residential, which will be responsible for its completion and marketing, as well as the architect Rafael Robleado, who will redesign the unfinished areas to make them more attractive and facilitate their sale. [147]

In June 2019, the media reported on the "resurrection" of Intempo, and more details of the design changes emerged. Regarding the interiors of the apartments, partition walls were removed and sliding doors were replaced to gain space and light. The vast majority of one-bedroom apartments were replaced with two-bedroom units. The top two floors are dedicated to communal leisure areas accessible to all residents, such as a gym, swimming pool, and hot tub, with the rooftop serving as a chill- out zone. [148] It also features a restaurant exclusively for residents and a 1200 m² terrace. [149] As for the street-level communal areas, the Olympic-size swimming pool and tennis and paddle tennis courts were replaced by a beach-style pool (with varying slopes) and a children's area. The 600 m² entrance hall has a contemporary Art Deco design. [50] The inverted cone is now called a diamond. [35] [150]

The building obtained its building permit in July 2019. [151] Construction began in the fourth quarter of 2019 [151] and was completed in July 2021, with an initial estimated completion date of late 2020. The delay was primarily attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain. [15] Dragados was the company responsible for resuming construction. [152] On June 22, 2021, the Spanish flag was raised for the second time, this time to commemorate the completion of the works. [153] The apartments have been marketed for prices ranging from €250,000 for ground-floor units in the towers to €1.5 million for the largest apartments located in the cone or diamond. [35]

Problems

The architects, Pérez-Guerras and Olcina & Radúan, resigned. [7]

While reports that the building did not include elevator shafts [7] were false, [154] poor planning led to unsafe working conditions for the builders, construction outpacing design, and a construction elevator collapse which injured several of the thirteen workers aboard. Efforts to assist these people were hampered by design flaws which did not permit emergency vehicles onto the building site. [7]

Reception

The Intempo building is seen by many analysts as an example of the economic and financial crisis in Spain triggered by the bursting of a housing bubble in 2007. [155] At the start of the project, the construction industry was still in a phase of expansion, marked by significant speculation. Between 2006 and 2008, according to the developers, one hundred apartments had already been sold off-plan, 40% of the total, [156] [63] but in subsequent years only about twenty more were sold. [22] This figure appeared in numerous press releases, and the possibility of continuing construction despite the crisis was even justified by the fact that sufficient funds were available, given that 40% of the apartments had already been sold off-plan. [156] In 2013, it was stated that almost two hundred apartments (75% of the building) remained unsold. [157]

In 2013, Intempo was nominated as one of the best concrete buildings in the world at the FIB (Fédération Internationale du Béton) International Awards, in the building category. [158] It had previously been selected by the Scientific-Technical Association of Structural Concrete (ACHE). [159]

Media impact

As with the Gran Hotel Bali, the Intempo building has been the site of base jumps, a high-risk form of parachuting, due to its altitude and the absence of nearby obstacles. In 2012, Álvaro Bultó successfully completed several jumps after the structure was finished. [160] [161] However, some jumps have not been authorized, such as the one that took place in June 2014 in the early hours of the morning. [162] [163]

The building was featured in the Spanish Television (TVE) program "España a ras de cielo", presented by Francis Lorenzo, in the second episode of the first season entitled Tú a Mallorca, yo a Benidorm and first broadcast on September 24, 2013, [164] which was watched by 1,869,000 viewers (10.2% audience share). [165]

The building also appears in the opening credits of the eight-part television miniseries Crematorio, produced by Canal+ in 2011, based on the book of the same name by Rafael Chirbes. Accompanied by the song "Cruzando el paraíso" by the singer Loquillo, it appears in the first few seconds when it was in its initial phase of construction, [166] as a paradigmatic example of urban speculation on the Mediterranean coast. [167]

In August 2023, the music video for Myke Towers' song "Bajo El Sol," filmed in the skyscraper, was released. [168]

See also

Notes

  1. Antena 3, [37] Nació Digital, [38] y La Gaceta de Salamanca. [39] Los medios internacionales como ZDnet (grupo CBS), [40] CNN, [41] New York Daily News , [42] Corriere della Sera , [43] The Independent , [44] The Huffington Post , [45] Libération , [46] Bild , [47] Focus , [48]   N24 , [49]   Neue Zürcher Zeitung , [50]   Der Spiegel , [51]   Stern, [52] Die Welt , [53] Sankei Shimbun, [54] y Yomiuri Shimbun [54]
  2. Los tres socios de Olga Urbana SL son el empresario vasco José Ignacio de la Serna de Grupo Arcentales, Isidro Boronat de Coblanca y el hotelero Juan Fuster. [69]

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 "Residencial In Tempo". CTBUH.
  2. "Intempo". Skyscraper Center. CTBUH. Retrieved 14 October 2017.
  3. Intempo Residentiel Sky Resort
  4. "Emporis building ID 251352". Emporis . Archived from the original on 8 September 2015.. Retrieved 17 July 2013.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Gutiérrez de Tejada Espuelas, Enrique; Regalado Tesoro, Florentino (2010). "Intempo. Estructura de un edificio de 180 metros de altura" (PDF). Hormigón y Acero (PDF). 61 (257): 41–55. ISSN   0439-5689. Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 July 2018. Retrieved 22 December 2015.
  6. Burgen, Stephen (17 July 2013). "In Tempo: towering testament to madness of Spain's construction boom". The Guardian . London. Retrieved 3 April 2014.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 Esquitino, Rubén (26 July 2013). "Benidorm's prized high-rise tower becomes a symbol of incompetence". El País. Retrieved 2 October 2020.
  8. "La recta final del In Tempo". Diario Información. 12 March 2014. Retrieved 4 April 2014.
  9. "El rascacielos 'Intempo' de Benidorm, el más alto del país, inicia la venta de sus pisos de lujo". Europa Press. 10 July 2018. Retrieved 2 October 2020.
  10. 1 2 Burgen, Stephen (20 July 2021). "Tallest apartment building in EU finally completed in Benidorm". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 20 July 2021.
  11. 1 2 Alcaide, José M. (18 August 2013). "¿Solución para Intempo? La torre más alta de Europa atrae al capital extranjero". El Economista . Retrieved 5 January 2016.
  12. 1 2 Sanz, Elena (18 April 2018). "SVPGlobal ya es dueño de In Tempo y pone el foco en los rusos para vender 269 pisos". El Confidencial. Retrieved 29 April 2018.
  13. 1 2 3 4 Fernando, R. (18 April 2018). "El nuevo dueño del edificio In Tempo de Benidorm acabará las obras en doce meses" . Retrieved 29 April 2018.
  14. "InTempo ya tiene vendido el 40% de los pisos... un año antes de estar terminados". Idealista. 27 September 2019.
  15. 1 2 L. Verdú (9 July 2021). "Intempo, el techo de Europa, acaba sus obras en Benidorm 14 años después con pisos que superan el millón de euros". ABC (in Spanish). Retrieved 25 July 2021.
  16. Gutiérrez de Tejada Espuelas, Enrique; Regalado Tesoro, Florentino (3 September 2010). "Intempo. Estructura de un edificio de 180 metros de altura" (PDF). Hormigón y acero. 61 (257): 41–55. ISSN   0439-5689 . Retrieved 3 January 2016.
  17. "Construyen en Benidorm la torre residencial más alta de Europa". Levante-EMV. Retrieved 21 January 2016.
  18. Higueras López, Mª Nieves (July 2012). "Benidorm, estudio de su modelo urbanístico" (PDF). Proyecto fin de grado de Ingeniería de la edificación. Retrieved 21 January 2016.
  19. "Intempo: el rascacielos residencial más alto de Europa en Benidorm que se terminará doce años después". ABC. 24 July 2019.
  20. "Detalles de la construcción de la parte superior del edificio" (PDF). Kono (empresa que realizó los forjados). n.d. Archived from the original (PDF) on 31 March 2017. Retrieved 23 December 2015.
  21. Balaguer, Artur (19 January 2012). "La arquitectura del vértigo". El País . Retrieved 3 January 2016.
  22. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Yus, Silvia (20 April 2014). "El edificio residencial más alto de Europa, a la venta por 90 millones de euros". El Mundo . Benidorm. Retrieved 7 January 2016.
  23. 1 2 3 "Así será el InTempo, el edificio residencial más alto de España". El Mundo . 12 May 2013. Retrieved 23 December 2015.
  24. 1 2 Marín, Julio (30 September 2008). "In Tempo pone rumbo al cielo". Diario Información. Retrieved 24 January 2016.
  25. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Gutiérrez de Tejada Espuelas, Enrique. "Edificio Intempo en Benidorm: estructura de 180 metros de altura" (PDF). Ponencia en el Colegio de ingenieros de caminos de Alicante: 39–52. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 7 January 2016.
  26. "Intempo en Benidorm: la torre residencial más alta de Europa" (in Spanish). 21 July 2021. Retrieved 25 July 2021.
  27. "Benidorm estrena un emblema de altura". El Correo (in Spanish). 10 July 2021. Retrieved 25 July 2021.
  28. "Tocant el cel" (PDF). El Temps (in Catalan). 21 March 2006. pp. 52–53. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 February 2016. Retrieved 26 January 2016.
  29. 1 2 3 Esquitino, Rubén (21 September 2013). "Recreación de un fiasco". El País . Retrieved 3 January 2016.
  30. 1 2 3 4 S., Navarro (28 August 2013). "Pérez Guerras asegura que In Tempo cumple desde sus inicios los requisitos de viabilidad". Diario Información. Retrieved 5 January 2015.
  31. Navarro, Santiago (25 August 2013). "Los arquitectos del In Tempo improvisaron otro forjado para la sala de máquinas del ascensor". Diario Información. Retrieved 3 January 2016.
  32. "Memoria Calidades Intempo" (PDF). www.intempobenidorm.com. Grupo Edicio Intempo. June 2012. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 November 2014. Retrieved 7 January 2016.
  33. 1 2 "El rumor sobre el Intempo de Benidorm es falso. Tiene 6 ascensores". Radio Sirena. 12 August 2013. Archived from the original on 24 December 2015. Retrieved 23 December 2015.
  34. "Construcción de rascacielos Intempo enfrenta dificultades por crisis económica española". El Financiero . San José, Costa Rica. AFP. 1 October 2013. Retrieved 19 January 2016.
  35. 1 2 3 E. Sanz (19 July 2021). "Intempo toca el cielo batiendo récords: el más alto, el más caro y el más rápido". El Confidencial (in Spanish). Retrieved 25 July 2021.
  36. Díaz, Jesús. "47-story Spanish skyscraper has no elevator, just like Spain's economy". Gizmodo. Retrieved 24 January 2016.
  37. "Los arquitectos del rascacielos residencial más alto de Europa olvidan diseñar el hueco del ascensor - ANTENA 3 TV". Antena3.com. 11 August 2014. Retrieved 22 January 2016.
  38. "Nació Digital: S'obliden de posar ascensor a un gratacels de Benidorm" [Olvidan colocar el ascensor a un rascacielos de Benidorm]. Nació Digital (in Catalan). 10 August 2013. Archived from the original on 30 January 2016. Retrieved 23 January 2016.
  39. "Olvidan diseñar el hueco del ascensor en el rascacielos más alto de Europa". La Gaceta de Salamanca. 10 August 2013. Archived from the original on 30 January 2016. Retrieved 23 January 2016.
  40. Falk, Tyler (8 August 2013). "A 47-story Spanish skyscraper forgets the elevator". ZDNet . Retrieved 24 January 2016.
  41. Erin Burnett (8 August 2013). "Spanish skyscraper missing elevator - CNN Video". CNN . Retrieved 22 January 2016.
  42. Julian Arenzon (9 August 2013). "Builders forgot elevator shafts on finished Skyscraper". Daily News . Archived from the original on 10 December 2015. Retrieved 23 January 2016.
  43. Burchia, Elmar (10 August 2013). "Spagna, un grattacielo di 47 piani Ma nel progetto non c'è l'ascensore". Corriere della Sera (in Italian). Retrieved 22 January 2016.
  44. "Benidorm boom hit by builder boo boo - The News Matrix: Saturday 10 August 2013". The Independent . 10 August 2013. Retrieved 22 January 2016.
  45. "Vous ne devinerez jamais ce que les architectes ont oublié dans cette tour" [Nunca adivinará qué se han olvidado los arquitectos en esta torre]. Le Huffington Post (in French). 10 August 2013. Retrieved 24 January 2016.
  46. "En Espagne, une tour de 47 étages sans ascenseur" [En España, una torre de 47 pisos sin ascensor]. Libération (in French). 12 August 2013. Retrieved 22 January 2016.
  47. "Bau-Desaster in Spanien - Hochhaus gebaut – aber Aufzug fehlt". BILD.de (in German). 12 August 2013. Retrieved 22 January 2016.
  48. "Hochhaus mit 47 Etagen – und dann fehlt der Aufzug". Online Focus. 9 August 2013. Retrieved 22 January 2016.
  49. "InTempo-Wolkenkratzer in Benidorm: Spaniens peinlichstes Baudesaster". N24.de (in German). 11 August 2013. Retrieved 22 January 2016.
  50. 1 2 "Wirbel um Lifte in Hochhaus in Benidorm" [Olvidan los ascensores en un edificio en Benidorm]. Neue Zürcher Zeitung (in German). Zúrich. 13 August 2013. Retrieved 23 January 2016.
  51. Frank Patalong (12 August 2013). "Wolkenkratzer ohne Aufzug: Der Treppenwitz von Benidorm" [Rascacielos sin ascensor: La ironía de Benidorm]. Spiegel online (in German). Retrieved 23 January 2016.
  52. "Pannenbau in Benidorm: Architekten vergessen Aufzüge im Wolkenkratzer" [Pannenbau en Benidorm : Arquitectos olvidan ascensores en los rascacielos]. Stern.de (in German). Retrieved 23 January 2016.
  53. Müller, Ute (12 August 2013). "Aufzug-Posse um Wolkenkratzer in Benidorm". Welt Online. Retrieved 23 January 2016.
  54. 1 2 "「スペイン高層ビルがエレベーター付け忘れ」 世界を駆け巡った衝撃記事は大誤報だった" [El impactante artículo "Rascacielos de España olvidan ascensor" ha atravesado el mundo causando una gran desinformación]. J-CASTニュース (in Japanese). Retrieved 24 January 2016.
  55. 1 2 3 Esquitino, Rubén (20 July 2013). "InTempo, una incompetencia de altura". El País . Retrieved 3 January 2016. Según fuentes cercanas al corazón del proyecto [...] no se había tenido en cuenta el hueco del ascensor, como bien se ve en los diseños promocionales donde no constan los típicos espacios dedicados en las azoteas a los motores elevadores. [...] El espacio estaba calculado para un bloque de 20 plantas.
  56. Álvaro Ibáñez (Alvy) (12 August 2013). "Intempo: el extraño caso del rascacielos que no tenía pero sí tenía ascensores hasta la última planta". Microsiervos (in Spanish). Retrieved 23 January 2016.
  57. Raquel López (30 April 2013). "In Tempo, tocar el cielo en Benidorm". De Vacaciones y Puentes. Retrieved 23 January 2016.
  58. "Edificio Intempo on Twitter". Twitter . 11 August 2013. Retrieved 24 January 2016.
  59. "Los arquitectos del Intempo desmienten errores en el proyecto y rectifican a una cadena de televisión nacional". La Marina Plaza. 13 August 2013. Retrieved 19 January 2016.
  60. dpa (12 August 2013). "Wolkenkratzer in Benidorm: Fehlende Aufzüge? Bank weist Berichte zurück" [Rascacielos en Benidorm: faltan los ascensores? El Banco (sic) desmiente los informes]. Stuttgarter Nachrichten (in German). Stuttgart. Retrieved 24 January 2016.
  61. 1 2 "Una doble torre de 200 metros situada en Benidorm será el edificio residencial más alto de Europa". ABC . 20 January 2006. Retrieved 3 January 2016.
  62. 1 2 Castillo, Sergí (2 May 2008). "200 metros de altura para el 'skyline' de Benidorm". El País . Retrieved 3 January 2016.
  63. 1 2 3 Pagés, R. "El edificio Intempo inicia su segunda fase con un 40% de viviendas vendidas - Levante-EMV". Levante-EMV . Retrieved 3 January 2016.
  64. "Edificio Intempo". Olcina & Raduán Arquitectos. Archived from the original on 27 January 2016. Retrieved 7 January 2016.
  65. Ruiz, Arturo (16 January 2011). "Turismo de alturas". Levante-EMV . Retrieved 8 January 2016.
  66. 1 2 Julio Marín (9 September 2010). "Denuncian a la promotora del edificio InTempo por presunta estafa y apropiación". Diario Información. Retrieved 7 January 2016.
  67. Fernández, Noelia (16 August 2011). "El sueño que une Benidorm con Malasia". Diario Información. Retrieved 7 January 2016.
  68. EFE (22 November 2004). "Una burbuja irregular con mensajes solidarios recordará en Madrid a las víctimas del 11-M". El País . Retrieved 8 January 2016.
  69. 1 2 3 "La empresa promotora del Intempo obtuvo un crédito de 93 millones con un capital social inicial de 3.100 euros". La Marina Plaza. 17 July 2013.
  70. "Benidorm le retira a Ortiz el plan parcial de los rascacielos". El Mundo. 28 March 2015. Retrieved 24 January 2016.
  71. 1 2 "La burbuja de Méndez explota en la Sareb". La Opinión A Coruña. 28 July 2013. Retrieved 7 January 2016.
  72. 1 2 Esquitino, Rubén (16 July 2013). "El 'banco malo' se queda el crédito de la torre más alta de Benidorm". El País .
  73. Noticias, La Marina Plaza (15 December 2015). "La estrategia de la Sareb deja a los compradores del InTempo desprotegidos y al borde de perderlo todo" (in Spanish). Retrieved 7 January 2016.
  74. "Sobre Sareb - Qué es Sareb". Sareb . Retrieved 7 January 2016.
  75. Ortín Ramón, Alberto (2 July 2014). "In Tempo, un rascacielos explosivo en el tejado de Sareb". Cinco Días . Retrieved 3 January 2016.
  76. "Benidorm's 'vertical city' lifted by tallest residential tower". Belfast Telegraph. 6 May 2008. Retrieved 24 January 2016.
  77. "Del piropo a la dirección de la obra". Diario Información. 4 March 2012. Retrieved 24 January 2016.
  78. "A doscientos metros del suelo (5º aniversario)". Diario Información. Retrieved 24 January 2016.
  79. 1 2 3 4 "Intempo - seguimiento de obras (Galería)". Roberto Pérez-Guerras Arquitectos. Archived from the original on 1 February 2016. Retrieved 24 January 2016.
  80. "Proyecto Intempo". Amgestek Project Management. Archived from the original on 31 January 2016. Retrieved 24 January 2016.
  81. "Éxito en la primera jornada de unión de las dos torres del edificio Intempo - Informacion.es". Diario Información. Retrieved 3 January 2016.
  82. 1 2 "El coloso de Benidorm empieza a unir sus torres". El Mundo . 21 July 2011. Retrieved 3 January 2016.
  83. 1 2 S., Illescas (12 March 2014). "La recta final del Intempo". Diario Información. Benidorm. Retrieved 5 January 2016.
  84. "ERE en la constructora de un rascacielos singular de Benidorm". Cinco Días. 15 July 2009. Retrieved 24 January 2016.
  85. Macu, Esteve (19 September 2010). "Las siete vidas del coloso del Mediterráneo" (PDF). El Mundo. p. 10. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 February 2016. Retrieved 7 January 2016.
  86. 1 2 3 Ortín, Alberto (4 October 2015). "Acabar con los privilegios de la Sareb, la única esperanza de los acreedores del In Tempo". Vozpópulí. Archived from the original on 24 January 2016. Retrieved 7 January 2016.
  87. "Grupo Kono Empresa de Estructuras, Forjados, Hormigón armado, Encofrados. Empresas constructoras y estructuristas en Alicante, Valencia, Benidorm". Kono Estructuras. Retrieved 5 January 2016.
  88. "Kono Estructuras SL, Alicante - Informe comercial, de riesgo, financiero y mercantil". Infocif. Archived from the original on 26 January 2016. Retrieved 5 January 2016.
  89. 1 2 "La empresa que hizo la estructura del Intempo reclama un millón de euros al promotor". La Marina Plaza. 18 July 2013.
  90. "Cae un montacargas con 13 albañiles del edificio en obras más alto de Benidorm". El Mundo. Retrieved 5 January 2016.
  91. "13 heridos, dos de ellos graves, al caer un ascensor en las obras de un rascacielos en Benidorm". RTVE.es . 24 June 2011. Retrieved 3 January 2016.
  92. "Los dos trabajadores heridos graves en el accidente de Benidorm están en planta". El Mundo. Retrieved 5 January 2016.
  93. Vicente, A.; M. C. Sánchez (25 June 2011). "Trece albañiles salvan la vida tras caer con un montacargas en Benidorm. La Verdad" . La Verdad . Retrieved 8 January 2016.
  94. "Vimos la muerte muy de cerca". Levante-EMV. 26 June 2011. Retrieved 24 January 2016.
  95. 1 2 "Los arquitectos del Intempo renuncian a la dirección de la obra cuando falta casi un 20% para su conclusión". La Marina Plaza. 12 July 2013.
  96. "Los arquitectos de Intempo dicen que su renuncia obedeció a "la pérdida de confianza" con el promotor tras el nombramiento de un 'project manager'". La Marina Plaza. 21 July 2013.
  97. 1 2 "Los arquitectos del Intempo dejan la obra por falta de seguridad". Levante-EMV . EFE. 21 July 2013. Retrieved 5 January 2016.
  98. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Elena Saiz (28 August 2016). "Una empresa local de Benidorm impide que Sareb se quede con el rascacielos InTempo". El Confidencial . Retrieved 1 September 2016.
  99. "InTempo Trailer "Torres a precio de saldo" DOCUMENTAL". Espaimedia video profesional, boda, corporativos, Benidorm, Alicante. Archived from the original on 29 January 2016. Retrieved 3 January 2016.
  100. "In tempo, la torre de Caixa Galicia en Benidorm, aún por construir - laSexta". laSexta.com. 15 August 2014. Archived from the original on 5 March 2016. Retrieved 5 January 2016.
  101. "Los arquitectos del edificio residencial más alto de España abandonan el proyecto al 80%". El Mundo. Retrieved 5 January 2016.
  102. Esquitino, Rubén (14 March 2015). "Un rascacielos con una torre de deudas". El País. Alicante. Retrieved 7 January 2016.
  103. "Trinitario Casanova negocia la compra del edificio residencial más alto de Europa". La Verdad. Murcia. 28 July 2014. Retrieved 24 January 2016.
  104. Esquitino, Rubén (26 September 2013). "Un inversor saudí negocia la adquisición del edificio InTempo". El País . Retrieved 5 January 2016.
  105. "El alcalde recibe al presidente del grupo inversor saudí Al Dhowayan | Benidorm - Portal Ciudadanos". portal.benidorm.org. Archived from the original on 31 January 2016. Retrieved 6 January 2016.
  106. 1 2 Sergio Illescas (3 January 2016). "Arranca la "subasta" de In Tempo". Levante-EMV . Retrieved 3 January 2016.
  107. 1 2 "In Tempo, la torre más alta de Benidorm, se vende por un precio base de 93 millones. Noticias de Comunidad Valenciana". El Confidencial. Retrieved 5 January 2016.
  108. 1 2 "Un juzgado ordena la detención del promotor del rascacielos de In Tempo de Benidorm". Valencia Plaza. 1 July 2014. Retrieved 5 January 2016.
  109. Noticias, La Marina Plaza (1 July 2014). "El promotor del Intempo 'pasa' de una citación para declarar en el juzgado y la magistrada ordena su detención" (in Spanish). Retrieved 5 January 2016.
  110. La Marina Plaza (9 February 2015). "Fallece José Ignacio de la Serna, el ideólogo y promotor del Intempo" (in Spanish). Retrieved 24 January 2016.
  111. Pagés, R. (10 February 2015). "Fallece José Ignacio de la Serna, promotor del InTempo". Diario Información. Retrieved 5 January 2016.
  112. Merino, José Luis (30 July 2012). "Intempo colosal - Ladrones de fuego". El País. Retrieved 6 January 2016.
  113. "Abren la vía a que los compradores de InTempo reclamen su dinero a los bancos". Diario Información. 22 October 2015. Retrieved 7 January 2016.
  114. 1 2 "La Sareb insta el concurso de acreedores de Olga Urbana, promotora del edificio In Tempo de Benidorm (Alicante)". Europa Press. 6 November 2014. Retrieved 5 January 2016.
  115. "El banco malo fuerza el concurso de acreedores de la promotora del Intempo". La Marina Plaza. 6 November 2014. Retrieved 5 January 2016.
  116. "BOE.es - Documento BOE-B-2014-44303". BOE . 17 December 2014. Retrieved 5 January 2016.
  117. Boletín Oficial del Registro Mercantil (12 January 2015). "SECCIÓN PRIMERA - Empresarios - Actos inscritos - ALICANTE" (PDF). BOE.es. p. 768. Retrieved 5 January 2016.
  118. "La administración concursal da un mes a los acreedores de Olga Urbana para reclamar sus deudas". Diario Información. 18 December 2014. Retrieved 5 January 2016.
  119. Rubén, Esquitino (14 December 2014). "El juez aprueba el concurso del mayor rascacielos de Benidorm". El País (in Spanish). Retrieved 5 January 2016.
  120. Antonia Magdaleno Abogados & Economistas (5 January 2015). "Carta de acreedores Olga Urbana" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 30 January 2016. Retrieved 5 January 2016.
  121. La Marina Plaza, ed. (8 March 2015). "La promotora del Intempo debe 136 millones, 42 más que valen sus activos" . Retrieved 5 January 2016.
  122. 1 2 Noticias, La Marina Plaza (9 March 2015). "77 compradores que pagaron más de 8,5 millones a Olga Urbana todavía no se han puesto en contacto con el administrador concursal" (in Spanish). Retrieved 5 January 2016.
  123. 1 2 David Navarro (19 May 2015). "La administradora concursal investiga el uso que la promotora del In Tempo hizo de los créditos" (PDF). Diario Información. Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 July 2016. Retrieved 5 January 2016.
  124. 1 2 3 4 Ortín Ramón, Alberto (20 March 2015). "Tasan en 1,6 millones un piso del In Tempo". Cinco Días . Retrieved 3 January 2016.
  125. "El edificio más alto de Europa, sin terminar, busca comprador por 90 millones de euros". Vozpópuli. 20 April 2014. Archived from the original on 25 January 2016. Retrieved 7 January 2016.
  126. "El mejor edificio acaba en manos del peor banco". La Marina Plaza. 13 July 2013. Retrieved 3 January 2016.
  127. 1 2 3 "El 'banco malo' no ejecutará el préstamo del Intempo y concluirá el rascacielos para vender los pisos que queden". La Marina Plaza. 16 April 2014. Retrieved 7 January 2016.
  128. 1 2 Raquel López (15 June 2014). "El «todo o nada» del coloso In Tempo". Diario Información. Archived from the original on 30 January 2016. Retrieved 7 January 2016.
  129. 1 2 3 A., Agencias (15 December 2015). "El rascacielos de Benidorm 'In Tempo' en venta tras la quiebra del promotor". El País (in Spanish). Retrieved 5 January 2016.
  130. "El juez pone en venta el 'In Tempo' el mayor rascacielos residencial de España". Cinco Días. 15 December 2015. Retrieved 7 January 2016.
  131. Comunicación Poder Judicial (14 December 2015). "Mercantil 1 de Alicante aprueba el plan de liquidación de la promotora del rascacielos In Tempo". Consejo General del Poder Judicial . Retrieved 7 January 2016.
  132. La Marina Plaza, ed. (14 December 2015). "El InTempo se subasta entero para que todos excepto la Sareb pierdan dinero" (in Spanish). Retrieved 5 January 2016.
  133. "La liquidación por subasta judicial del rascacielos Intempo Benidorm". Activos Concursales. Archived from the original on 12 January 2016. Retrieved 7 January 2016.
  134. "Una empresa especializada en liquidar activos calcula que el InTempo no podrá venderse por más de 60 millones". La Marina Plaza. 19 December 2015. Retrieved 7 January 2016.
  135. Pagés, R. (31 May 2016). "Dos grupos de inversión pujan en la subasta del InTempo". Diario Información. Retrieved 27 June 2016.
  136. Pagés, R. (18 June 2016). "Suspenden hasta octubre el juicio por la demanda de acreedores del InTempo". Diario Información. Retrieved 27 June 2016.
  137. 1 2 "Una sentencia acerca a la Sareb a la propiedad del rascacielos Intempo". Las Provincias. 15 February 2017. Archived from the original on 24 February 2017. Retrieved 24 February 2017.
  138. "Vía libre para que la Sareb se quede el In Tempo". El Mundo. 15 February 2017. Retrieved 24 February 2017.
  139. Pagés, R. (16 February 2017). "Acreedores del InTempo preparan su segundo asalto judicial para frenar la adjudicación a la Sareb". Diario Información. Retrieved 24 February 2017.
  140. "La Justicia permite que la Sareb se quede con el Intempo de Benidorm por 58 millones de euros - elEconomista.es". elEconomista.es. 17 February 2017. Retrieved 24 February 2017.
  141. "Sareb no se adjudicará el rascacielos de Benidorm hasta el fin de la batalla judicial". El Confidencial. 1 June 2017. Retrieved 1 June 2017.
  142. Sanz, Elena (6 November 2017). "Sareb vende la deuda del rascacielos In Tempo al fondo oportunista de un ex BBVA". El Confidencial (in Spanish). Retrieved 29 April 2018.
  143. Barrón, Íñigo de (7 November 2017). "La Sareb vende a un fondo la hipoteca del rascacielos InTempo de Benidorm por un precio superior al de compra". El País (in Spanish). ISSN   1134-6582 . Retrieved 29 April 2018.
  144. Sanz, Elena (11 November 2017). "Así fue la jugada maestra del fondo que se hizo con la deuda del rascacielos In Tempo". El Confidencial. Retrieved 29 April 2018.
  145. Martínez, David (31 May 2018). "El juez extingue la promotora del In Tempo tras adjudicar el edificio y aprobar la liquidación". Alicante Plaza (in Spanish). Retrieved 8 September 2019.
  146. Ortín, Alberto (4 July 2018). "Los herederos del constructor del InTempo, condenados a pagar 17 millones". Vozpópuli (in European Spanish). Retrieved 8 September 2019.
  147. Pagés, Ramón (13 December 2018). "Los dueños del InTempo retomarán la obra en 3 meses tras 4 años de bloqueo". Diario Información (in Spanish). Retrieved 8 September 2019.
  148. E. Sanz (20 May 2019). "El rascacielos más famoso de Benidorm resucita y se transforma en pisos de lujo". El Confidencial (in Spanish). Retrieved 8 September 2019.
  149. Mercader, Alba (7 September 2019). "Así lucirá el nuevo Intempo de Benidorm". Alicante Plaza (in Spanish). Retrieved 8 September 2019.
  150. Dani Valero. "Furor por los pisos más altos de Europa: Intempo vende en tres meses el 40%". Eleconomista.es (in Spanish). Retrieved 25 July 2021.
  151. 1 2 "Rascacielos Intempo, una construcción de 12 años". La Vanguardia. 24 July 2019. Retrieved 8 September 2019.
  152. "Dragados inicia las obras para terminar el InTempo con el 40% de las viviendas reservadas". Alicanteplaza (in Spanish). 13 November 2019. Retrieved 25 July 2021.
  153. Pagés, R. (22 June 2021). "La torre InTempo cuelga la bandera 14 años después de empezar a construirse en Benidorm". Información (in Spanish). Retrieved 25 July 2021.
  154. Griffiths, Alyn (2013), Developer attacks "ridiculous" reports that skyscraper has no elevators, dezeen magazine, retrieved 10 March 2015
  155. Burgen, Stephen (17 July 2013). "In Tempo: towering testament to madness of Spain's construction boom". The Guardian .
  156. 1 2 "Por encima de la crisis". Diario Información. 13 May 2008. Retrieved 24 January 2016.
  157. "Un proyecto millonario devorado por el estallido de la burbuja". Diario Información. 27 September 2013. Retrieved 7 January 2016.
  158. "Inversores extranjeros interesados en participar en la propietaria de Intempo". El Confidencial. 14 August 2013. Retrieved 23 December 2015.
  159. "El edificio Intempo aspira a ser la mejor construcción del mundo en hormigón". canalDiario Información. 9 February 2013. Retrieved 23 December 2015.
  160. EFE (4 May 2012). "Cuatro deportistas saltarán al vacío desde el edificio ´in Tempo´". Diario Información. Retrieved 7 January 2016.
  161. "Salto al vacío en Benidorm". El País. Alicante. 5 May 2012. Retrieved 7 January 2016.
  162. Roberto Bécares De La Hera (15 June 2014). "Se cuelan en el rascacielos InTempo de Benidorm y saltan en parapente desde la azotea". El Mundo. Benidorm. Retrieved 7 January 2016.
  163. Raquel López (16 June 2014). "Tres personas se cuelan para saltar desde el In Tempo". Diario Información. Retrieved 7 January 2016.
  164. "España a ras de cielo - Tú a Mallorca yo a Benidorm, España a ras de cielo - RTVE.es A la Carta". RTVE.es (in European Spanish). 30 October 2015. Retrieved 8 January 2016.
  165. Esteve, Macu (26 September 2013). "Más de 1,8 millones de espectadores conocieron Benidorm 'a ras de cielo'". La Marina Plaza (in Spanish). Retrieved 8 January 2016.
  166. "Cabecera de 'Crematorio'. Sección vídeos" (Vídeo). Canal+ . Retrieved 8 January 2016.
  167. Galán, Diego (21 August 2015). "Chirbes en la pantalla". El País . Retrieved 8 January 2016.
  168. "Con Myke Towers, el verano no se acaba: así suena su nueva canción 'Bajo El Sol'". LOS40 (in European Spanish). 25 August 2023. Retrieved 25 August 2023.