Italian prisoners of war in World War I

Last updated November 18, 2023

Around 600,000 Italian soldiers were taken prisoner during the First World War, about half in the aftermath of Caporetto. Roughly one Italian soldier in seven was captured, a significantly higher number than in other armies on the Western Front.^[1]^[2] About 100,000 Italian prisoners of war never returned home, having succumbed to hardship, hunger, cold and disease (mainly tuberculosis).^[3]^[4]^: 126 Uniquely among the Allied powers, Italy refused to assist its prisoners, and even hindered efforts by soldiers’ families to send them food.^[4]^: 130–31 As a result, the death rate for Italian prisoners was nine times worse than that of Austro-Hungarian prisoners in Italy.^[5]^: 6

Living conditions for the prisoners

The main camps where Italian prisoners were held were at Mauthausen, Sigmundsherberg and Theresienstadt (Bohemia) in Austria-Hungary and Celle (Hanover) and Rastatt (Baden) in Germany.^[4]^: 126–7

Prisoners (except officers) were made to work, but while labour was compulsory, conditions were not unduly harsh. There was no systematic brutality towards Italian prisoners of war, but there was corporal punishment and occasional violence.^[4]^: 124–5 Prisoners also had to face cold and disease, especially tuberculosis. The main hardship was a lack of food, severely aggravated by the Allied blockade that led to food shortages in Germany and Austria-Hungary.^[4]^: 126

In order to survive these conditions, aid sent by the prisoners’ families was essential. However the parcels sent to them often did not arrive, or were tampered with or looted.^[4]^: 128–9 The lack of any organised system for delivery meant many parcels only arrived when their content was no longer edible. At the end of the war there were still 1.5 million parcels awaiting delivery in Sigmundsherberg and 72,000 in storage in Csòt bei Papa, Hungary.^[1]

Most prisoner deaths occurred in the first half of 1918 and those who died were mainly captured between October and November 1917. Only 550 out of 19,500 Italian officers in captivity died (less than 3 percent), mainly due to combat injuries.^[1] Unlike the officers, almost all private soldiers' deaths were due to deprivation.^[6]

Refusal of public assistance

The Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907 required countries holding prisoners of war to feed them at their own expense. Given the large number of prisoners they held, it became very hard for Germany and Austria-Hungary to meet their obligations, and when the Allied blockade was imposed, they announced that they could no longer do so.^[1]

The other Allies therefore made agreements with the Central Powers, by which they could send food securely to their own nationals in captivity. The sole exception was Italy, convinced that the prisoners were cowards, deserters or traitors, and concerned that making conditions in the prison camps easier might encourage desertions. Only at the very end of the conflict did the Italian government make partial and tentative efforts to support its captured troops.^[4]^: 130–31

International comparisons and troop morale

The number of prisoners of war for the different combatants gives some indication of troop morale. A total of 1,700,000 Austrian soldiers were taken prisoner, compared with 180,000 British, 500,000 French and 600,000 Italians.^[7]^: 65

The morale of the Italian army took a marked turn for the worse during the Tenth Battle of the Isonzo. There were cases of the infantry refusing to launch further futile attacks, despite the punitive discipline that Army Chief of Staff Luigi Cadorna and his generals enforced. For the first time, infantrymen laid down their arms and surrendered relatively easily. The Italian casualty figures for the tenth battle included more than 27,000 taken prisoner. Morale was little higher on the other side however, and in the same campaign 24,000 Austrian troops surrendered to the Italians.^[7]^: 221 The disaster of Caporetto (twelfth battle of the Isonzo), saw relatively low Italian casualties—10,000 killed and 30,000 wounded—but around 280,000 Italians were taken prisoner and a further 350,000 simply deserted.^[7]^: 261

Cadorna had no doubt that there were too many Italian prisoners of war, and that they were guilty of a lack of martial spirit, cowardice, or—worst of all—desertion. The strict discipline imposed on the troops may have been a factor in some cases in their allowing themselves to be taken, but it is not possible to determine how many Italian soldiers were captured in combat and how many simply gave up fighting.^[8]^: 348

Official Italian attitudes towards POWs

In comparison with their neighbours, Italy's soldiers were treated harshly by their own commanders. Italy mobilised the same number of men as mainland Britain, and executed at least three times as many. No other army routinely punished entire units by ‘decimation’, executing randomly selected men. Only the Italian government treated its captured soldiers as cowards or defectors, blocking the delivery of food.^[5]

Official Italian propaganda dealt with the prisoners of war almost entirely by reaffirming the dishonorable character of their condition: the prisoners were "unfortunate and shamed" men who had "sinned against the fatherland", as nationalist writer Gabriele D'Annunzio proclaimed and repeated in the press. The defeat at Caporetto sealed this disapproval.^[8]^: 346 At the same time, the propaganda included a series of pamphlets distributed in 1917–1918, describing in grim detail the living conditions of the prisoners. The intention was to stoke hatred towards the enemy, discourage the soldiers from surrendering, and spread the message that surrender was a dishonorable act that would worsen a soldier's living conditions and increase his suffering.^[8]^: 347

The unanimous view of the authorities was that looking after the prisoners was a private matter for their families and not the responsibility of the army. Indeed, Cadorna intervened to block any assistance to them, for example by prohibiting the Red Cross from fundraising for assistance to prisoners.^[8]^: 348 In the aftermath of Caporetto, establishment hostility towards the prisoners was evident in the action of Foreign Minister Sidney Sonnino, who ordered a reduction in the food parcels sent to Italian prisoners in Austria and temporarily banned the sending of relief for those in Germany.^[1]

The view that prisoners were suspects who probably merited punishment prompted Cadorna’s successor, Armando Diaz, to suggest in March 1918 that on their return home, prisoners should not be allowed to remain in Italy, but be sent on rapidly to fight in Libya and Macedonia.^[2]

Public attitudes towards returning prisoners

Upon their return home, the prisoners were met with general disinterest both from the press and from public institutions: imprisonment was regarded as dishonourable, suspicious, and something to be forgotten. Uniquely among the Allies, Italy held no welcoming celebrations for their returning prisoners of war.^[2]

The military press did not cover them; they did not figure in post-war debates, in the memoirs of commanders, or in the documentation published by the Army Historical Bureau. Although former prisoners in France had formed a federation to defend their rights, in Italy the expectation was that they were to be forgotten. During the Fascist period with its memorialisation of war heroes, there was no change of attitude towards prisoners of war.^[8]^: 348

Related Research Articles

The Battle of Caporetto was a battle on the Italian front of World War I.

The 1st Army was a Royal Italian Army field army, in World War I, facing Austro-Hungarian and German forces, and in World War II, fighting on the North African front.

Marshal of Italy Luigi Cadorna, was an Italian general, Marshal of Italy and Count, most famous for being the Chief of Staff of the Italian Army from 1914 until 1917 during World War I. During this period he acquired a reputation for rigid discipline and the harsh treatment of his troops. Cadorna achieved successes at the battles of Asiago and Gorizia but, following a major defeat at the Battle of Caporetto in late 1917, he was relieved as Chief of Staff.

The Battle of Vittorio Veneto was fought from 24 October to 3 November 1918 near Vittorio Veneto on the Italian Front during World War I. After having thoroughly defeated Austro-Hungarian troops during the defensive Battle of the Piave River, the Italian army launched a great counter-offensive: the Italian victory marked the end of the war on the Italian Front, secured the dissolution of the Austro-Hungarian Empire and contributed to the end of the First World War just one week later. On 1 November, the new Hungarian government of Count Mihály Károlyi decided to recall all of the troops, who were conscripted from the territory of Kingdom of Hungary, which was a major blow for the Habsburg's armies. The battle led to the capture of over 5,000 artillery pieces and over 350,000 Austro-Hungarian troops, including 120,000 Germans, 83,000 Czechs and Slovaks, 60,000 South Slavs, 40,000 Poles, several tens of thousands of Romanians and Ukrainians, and 7,000 Austro-Hungarian loyalist Italians and Friulians.

The Sixth Battle of the Isonzo, better known as the Battle of Gorizia, was the most successful Italian offensive along the Soča (Isonzo) River during World War I.

Italian prisoners of war in the Soviet Union is the narrative of POWs from the Italian Army in Russia and of their fate in Stalin's Soviet Union during and after World War II.

The First Battle of the Isonzo was fought between the armies of Italy and Austria-Hungary on the northeastern Italian Front in World War I, between 23 June and 7 July 1915.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Luigi Capello</span> Italian general

Luigi Capello was an Italian general, distinguished in both the Italo-Turkish War (1911–12) and World War I.

The Eleventh Battle of the Isonzo was a World War I battle fought by the Italian and Austro-Hungarian Armies on the Italian Front between 18 August and 12 September 1917.

Although a member of the Triple Alliance, Italy did not join the Central Powers – Germany and Austria-Hungary – when the war started with Austria-Hungary's declaration of war on Serbia on 28 July 1914. In fact, the two Central Powers had taken the offensive while the Triple Alliance was supposed to be a defensive alliance. Moreover the Triple Alliance recognized that both Italy and Austria-Hungary were interested in the Balkans and required both to consult each other before changing the status quo and to provide compensation for whatever advantage in that area: Austria-Hungary did consult Germany but not Italy before issuing the ultimatum to Serbia, and refused any compensation before the end of the war.

The Seventh Battle of the Isonzo was fought from September 14–17, 1916 between the armies of the Kingdom of Italy and those of Austria-Hungary. It followed the Italian successes during the Trentino Offensive and the Sixth Battle of the Isonzo in the spring of 1916.

The Tenth Battle of the Isonzo was an Italian offensive against Austria-Hungary during World War I.

Events from the year 1917 in Italy.

The White War is the name given to the fighting in the high-altitude Alpine sector of the Italian front during the First World War, principally in the Dolomites, the Ortles-Cevedale Alps and the Adamello-Presanella Alps. More than two-thirds of this conflict zone lies at an altitude above 2,000m, rising to 3905m at Mount Ortler. In 1917 New York World correspondent E. Alexander Powell wrote: “On no front, not on the sun-scorched plains of Mesopotamia, nor in the frozen Mazurian marshes, nor in the blood-soaked mud of Flanders, does the fighting man lead so arduous an existence as up here on the roof of the world.”

In Italy as in other countries the outbreak of the First World War created new opportunities and channels for propaganda. The unusual circumstances of Italy’s entry into the war meant that the government played no active role in propaganda work during the early years of the war. Public opinion was served by a pro-war nationalist press that avoided the unpleasant details of life on the front, while the army regarded discipline as more important than morale, leaving soldiers’ welfare to the Church. The momentous Italian defeat at Caporetto saw an end to this laissez-faire approach and the beginnings of a more centralised and managed effort to motivate the public and the army to the national cause.

Between the 1860s and the First World War the Kingdom of Italy built a number of fortifications along its border with Austria-Hungary. From 1859 the fortified border ran south from Switzerland to Lake Garda, between Italian Lombardy and Austrian South Tyrol. After 1866 it extended to include the border between South Tyrol and Veneto, from Lake Garda to the Carnic Alps. This frontier was difficult to defend, since Austria-Hungary held the higher ground, and an invasion would immediately threaten the industrial and agricultural heartlands of the Po valley. Between 1900 and 1910, Italy also built a series of fortifications along the defensive line of the Tagliamento to protect against an invasion from the northeast. The border with Switzerland was also fortified in what is known as the Cadorna Line.

Roberto Brusati OSML OCI, was an Italian General of the Army who was an active participant in World War I. He was known for not having any military experience prior to the war and commanding the 1st Army before being dismissed from commanding the regiment on May 8, 1916, which was 8 days before the Battle of Asiago which was led by Field Marshal Franz Conrad von Hötzendorf.

Vittorio Italico Zupelli also known as Vittorio Zupelli, Vittorio Zuppelli and as Elio Vittorio Italico Zupelli was an Italian general and politician. He was the first Istrian to be appointed general of the Royal Italian Army and to hold the position of minister of the Kingdom of Italy. He as Minister of War twice, once when Italy entered the First World War, and again at the time of the armistice in 1918.

The Battle of Flondar, also known as the defeat of Flondar was a battle of the First World War, consisting of a counterattack launched by selected Austrian units under the command of General Svetozar Borojević against the Italian positions around the Monte Ermada. Although outnumbered, the Austro-Hungarians surprised the Italian defenses and, using new assault tactics, managed to reconquer some important positions, thus giving relief to their front lines.

About 8 million soldiers surrendered and were held in prisoner-of-war camps during World War I. All nations pledged to follow the Hague Conventions on fair treatment of prisoners of war, and the survival rate for POWs was generally, though not always, much higher than that of combatants at the front.

References

1 2 3 4 5 Gorgolini, Luca. "Prisoners of War (Italy)". International Encyclopedia of the First World War. Retrieved 10 October 2020.
1 2 3 Caredda, Giorgio (1994). "Soldati e prigionieri italiani nella prima guerra mondiale". Studi Storici. 35 (1): 251–254. JSTOR 20565610 . Retrieved 11 October 2020.
↑ "Il trattamento dei prigionieri di guerra". itinerariagrandeguerra.it. Itinerari Della Grande Guerra. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Gibelli, Antonio (2007). La grande guerra degli italiani. Milano: Bur. ISBN 978-88-1701-507-3.
1 2 Mark Thompson (2009-08-06). The White War: Life and Death on the Italian Front, 1915-1919. Faber & Faber. pp. 6–. ISBN 978-0-571-25008-0 . Retrieved 10 October 2020.
↑ Fornasin, Alessio; Breschi, Marco; Manfredini, Matter (March 2019). "Deaths and survivors in war: The Italian soldiers in WWI" (PDF). Demographic Research. 40: 599–626. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2019.40.22 . Retrieved 10 October 2020.
1 2 3 John Macdonald; Željko Cimpric (2011-12-13). Caporetto and the Isonzo Campaign: The Italian Front, 1915–1918. Pen & Sword Books. ISBN 978-1-78159-930-3 . Retrieved 10 October 2020.
1 2 3 4 5 Isnenghi, Mario; Rochat, Giorgio (2014). La grande guerra. Milan: Il Mulino. ISBN 9788815253897.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

[Enc-1] 1 2 3 4 5 Gorgolini, Luca. "Prisoners of War (Italy)". International Encyclopedia of the First World War. Retrieved 10 October 2020.

[GC-2] 1 2 3 Caredda, Giorgio (1994). "Soldati e prigionieri italiani nella prima guerra mondiale". Studi Storici. 35 (1): 251–254. JSTOR 20565610 . Retrieved 11 October 2020.

[Itin-3] "Il trattamento dei prigionieri di guerra". itinerariagrandeguerra.it. Itinerari Della Grande Guerra. Retrieved 8 October 2020.

[Gib-4] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Gibelli, Antonio (2007). La grande guerra degli italiani. Milano: Bur. ISBN 978-88-1701-507-3.

[WW-5] 1 2 Mark Thompson (2009-08-06). The White War: Life and Death on the Italian Front, 1915-1919. Faber & Faber. pp. 6–. ISBN 978-0-571-25008-0 . Retrieved 10 October 2020.

[6] Fornasin, Alessio; Breschi, Marco; Manfredini, Matter (March 2019). "Deaths and survivors in war: The Italian soldiers in WWI" (PDF). Demographic Research. 40: 599–626. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2019.40.22 . Retrieved 10 October 2020.

[Cap-7] 1 2 3 John Macdonald; Željko Cimpric (2011-12-13). Caporetto and the Isonzo Campaign: The Italian Front, 1915–1918. Pen & Sword Books. ISBN 978-1-78159-930-3 . Retrieved 10 October 2020.

[Isen-8] 1 2 3 4 5 Isnenghi, Mario; Rochat, Giorgio (2014). La grande guerra. Milan: Il Mulino. ISBN 9788815253897.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]