United States declaration of war on Germany (1917)

Last updated
Declaration of War with Germany
Great Seal of the United States (obverse).svg
Long title"Joint Resolution Declaring that a State of War exists between the Imperial German Government and the Government and the people of the United States and making provision to prosecute the same."
Enacted bythe 65th United States Congress
EffectiveApril 6, 1917
Citations
Public law Pub. L. Tooltip Public Law (United States)  65–1
Statutes at Large 40  Stat.   1
Legislative history
  • Introduced in the Senate as S.J.Res.1
  • Passed the U.S. Senate on April 2, 1917 (82-6 [6 not voting])
  • Passed the U.S. House of Representatives on April 5-6, 1917 (373-50 [8 not voting])
  • Signed into law by President Woodrow Wilson on April 6, 1917

On April 2, 1917, President Woodrow Wilson asked a special joint session of the United States Congress for a declaration of war against the German Empire. Congress responded with the declaration on April 6.

Contents

President Wilson's speech to Congress

President Woodrow Wilson in 1919 President Wilson 1919.jpg
President Woodrow Wilson in 1919
President Woodrow Wilson asking Congress to declare war on Germany on April 2, 1917. President Woodrow Wilson asking Congress to declare war on Germany, 2 April 1917.jpg
President Woodrow Wilson asking Congress to declare war on Germany on April 2, 1917.


On April 2, 1917, President Woodrow Wilson asked Congress to declare war on the German Empire (but, for the moment, not against Germany's allies) in a speech whose transcript [1] reads in part:

I have called the Congress into extraordinary session because there are serious, very serious, choices of policy to be made, and made immediately, which it was neither right nor constitutionally permissible that I should assume the responsibility of making. On the 3rd of February last, I officially laid before you the extraordinary announcement of the Imperial German government that on and after the 1st day of February it was its purpose to put aside all restraints of law or of humanity and use its submarines to sink every vessel that sought to approach either the ports of Great Britain and Ireland or the western coasts of Europe or any of the ports controlled by the enemies of Germany within the Mediterranean...

When I addressed the Congress on the 26th of February last, I thought that it would suffice to assert our neutral rights with arms, our right to use the seas against unlawful interference, our right to keep our people safe against unlawful violence. But armed neutrality, it now appears, is impracticable... Armed neutrality is ineffectual enough at best; in such circumstances and in the face of such pretensions it is worse than ineffectual: it is likely only to produce what it was meant to prevent; it is practically certain to draw us into the war without either the rights or the effectiveness of belligerents. There is one choice we cannot make, we are incapable of making: we will not choose the path of submission and suffer the most sacred rights of our nation and our people to be ignored or violated. The wrongs against which we now array ourselves are no common wrongs; they cut to the very roots of human life.

With a profound sense of the solemn and even tragical character of the step I am taking and of the grave responsibilities which it involves, but in unhesitating obedience to what I deem my constitutional duty, I advise that the Congress declare the recent course of the Imperial German government to be in fact nothing less than war against the government and people of the United States; that it formally accept the status of belligerent which has thus been thrust upon it; and that it take immediate steps, not only to put the country in a more thorough state of defense but also to exert all its power and employ all its resources to bring the government of the German Empire to terms and end the war...

The world must be made safe for democracy. Its peace must be planted upon the tested foundations of political liberty. We have no selfish ends to serve. We desire no conquest, no dominion. We seek no indemnities for ourselves, no material compensation for the sacrifices we shall freely make. We are but one of the champions of the rights of mankind. We shall be satisfied when those rights have been made as secure as the faith and the freedom of nations can make them...

Text of the declaration

WHEREAS, The Imperial German Government has committed repeated acts of war against the people of the United States of America; therefore, be it resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the state of war between the United States and the Imperial German Government, which has thus been thrust upon the United States, is hereby formally declared; and that the President be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to employ the entire naval and military forces of the United States and the resources of the Government to carry on war against the Imperial German Government; and to bring the conflict to a successful termination all the resources of the country are hereby pledged by the Congress of the United States. [2]

Senator La Follette's response

Sen. Robert La Follette in 1912 LAFOLLETTE, ROBERT M. REP. FROM WISCONSIN 1885-1891; GOVERNOR, 1901-1906; SENATOR, 1906-1925 LCCN2016863756 (cropped).jpg
Sen. Robert La Follette in 1912

During Senate debate on April 4, Senator Robert M. La Follette of Wisconsin, a leader of the progressive Republicans (and the Progressive Party's presidential candidate in 1924) delivered a long speech in opposition to a declaration of war, [3] during which he said:

I am talking now about principles. You cannot distinguish between the principles which allowed England to mine a large area of the Atlantic Ocean and the North Sea in order to shut in Germany, and the principle on which Germany by her submarines seeks to destroy all shipping which enters the war zone which she has laid out around the British Isles.

The English mines are intended to destroy without warning every ship that enters the war zone she has proscribed, killing or drowning every passenger that cannot find some means of escape. It is neither more nor less than that which Germany tries to do with her submarines in her war zone. We acquiesced in England’s action without protest. It is proposed that we now go to war with Germany for identically the same action upon her part. . . .

I say again that when two nations are at war any neutral nation, in order to preserve its character as a neutral nation, must exact the same conduct from both warring nations; both must equally obey the principles of international law. If a neutral nation fails in that, then its rights upon the high seas—to adopt the President’s phrase—are relative and not absolute. There can be no greater violation of our neutrality than the requirement that one of two belligerents shall adhere to the settled principles of law and that the other shall have the advantage of not doing so. The respect that German naval authorities were required to pay to the rights of our people upon the high seas would depend upon the question whether we had exacted the same rights from German’s enemies. If we had not done so, we lost our character as a neutral nation and our people unfortunately had lost the protection that belongs to neutrals. Our responsibility was joint in the sense that we must exact the same conduct from both belligerents.

The failure to treat the belligerent nations of Europe alike, the failure to reject the unlawful “war zones” of both Germany and Great Britain is wholly accountable for our present dilemma. We should not seek to hide our blunder behind the smoke of battle to inflame the mind of our people by half truths into the frenzy of war in order that they may never appreciate the real cause of it until it is too late. I do not believe that our national honor is served by such a course. The right way is the honorable way.

Votes

In the Senate, the resolution passed 82–6 (8 not voting) on April 4. [4] [5] [6]

In the House of Representatives, the resolution passed at 3 a.m. April 6 by a vote of 373–50 (8 not voting). [7] [5] [6] One of the dissenters was Republican Rep. Jeannette Rankin of Montana, who later became the only member of either chamber of Congress to vote against declaring war against the Japanese Empire on December 8, 1941 .

Breakdown by political party and geographical region

Senate

Senate vote
by party
YeaNayN/VYea
margin
percentage93%7%+ 86%
96 Members826(8)+ 76
54 Democrats443(7)+ 41
42 Republicans383(1)+ 35
source: GovTrack.US

Forty-four (44) Democratic and 38 Republican Senators voted for the Declaration. Three Democrats and three Republicans voted against it. Seven Democrats and one Republican did not vote.

In the U.S. Senate, the negative votes were cast by Republican members Asle Gronna (N. Dakota), Robert M. La Follette (Wisconsin) and George W. Norris (Nebraska), together with Democratic members Harry Lane (Oregon), William J. Stone (Missouri), and James K. Vardaman (Mississippi).

One Republican Senator (Nathan Goff of W. Va) of did not vote, nor did seven Democrats: John H. Bankhead (Alabama), Thomas Gore (Okla.), Henry F. Hollis (N.H.), Francis G. Newlands (Nevada), John Walter Smith (Maryland), Charles S. Thomas (Colo.), and Benjamin Tillman (S. Car.)

House of Representatives

House vote
by party
YeaNayN/VYea
margin
percentage88%12%+ 76%
431 Members37350(8)+ 323
213 Republicans17632(5)+ 144
212 Democrats19316(3)+ 177
3 Progressives3+ 3
Ind. Republican1+ 1
Socialist1– 1
Prohibitionist1– 1
source: GovTrack.US

Sixteen Democrats, 32 Republicans, the only Prohibitionist and the only Socialist in the House voted against the Declaration. On the other hand all three Progressive Party members and the only Independent Republican member voted for it — as did 193 Democrats and 176 Republicans. (Five Republicans and three Democrats did not vote on the question.)

Of the 50 members who voted against the resolution, 42 represented Western and Midwestern states (as did five of the six Senators who had voted against it in their own chamber).

Only three (a Michigan Republican, an Ohio Democrat, and a New York Socialist) [nb 1] came from Northern states east of Illinois [nb 2] and only five (Democrats from Alabama, Texas and the Carolinas) [nb 3] from the Southern states. [nb 4]

(No Representative from New England [nb 5] or from the Border States east of Missouri [nb 6] voted against the declaration.)

The three Northern Representatives out of 168 who voted against the declaration represented 2% of the Northern delegations, while the five Southern members who voted Nay constituted only 4% of the 128 Representatives from Southern and Border states.

However, nine out of 33 Representatives (27%) from the Far West [nb 7] voted against the declaration: three (one Democrat, one Republican, and one Prohibitionist) out of California's eleven Representatives; two of Washington state's five; two of Colorado's four; one (Jeannette Rankin) of Montana's two; and Nevada's sole Representative.

So did 33 out of 102 (32%) from the Mid-West: [nb 8] 9 out of 11 members from Wisconsin, 4 out of 10 from Minnesota, 6 out of 27 from Illinois, 4 out of 15 from Missouri, 3 out of 6 from Nebraska, 3 out of 11 from Iowa, 2 out of 3 from South Dakota and 2 out of 8 from Kansas. (All but six of the 33 Midwestern opponents of the declaration were Republicans; but the nine Far Western votes against the declaration were evenly divided between four Democrats, four Republicans and one Prohibitionist.) [nb 9]

Signatures

Immediately after the resolution was passed by the House, it was signed by House Speaker, Champ Clark. About nine hours later, at 12:14 p.m., it was signed by Vice President Thomas R. Marshall. Less than an hour later, President Wilson signed it at 1:11 p.m., and the United States was officially at war against the German Empire. [8]

See also

Notes

Footnotes

  1. Representatives Meyer London of New York — the House's only Socialist Party member, Isaac Sherwood — an Ohio Democrat, and Mark R. Bacon — a Michigan Republican
  2. Michigan, Indiana, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New York and New England
  3. Representatives Claude Kitchin of North Carolina, Frederick H. Dominick of South Carolina, Edward B. Almon of Alabama, John L. Burnett, also of Alabama, and A. Jeff McLemore of Texas
  4. Virginia, North & South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Arkansas and Louisiana
  5. Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode Island and Connecticut
  6. Tennessee, Kentucky, West Virginia, Maryland and Delaware
  7. California, Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, Utah, Nevada, Arizona and New Mexico
  8. Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, Missouri, Oklahoma, Kansas, Nebraska, South Dakota and North Dakota
  9. In other words — in addition to the New York Socialist and the California Prohibitionist — 5 of the 16 Democratic opponents of the war came from the South, 1 from Ohio, 6 from the rest of the Mid-West and 4 from the Far West, while the 32 Republican opponents can be divided less evenly between 27 Midwesterners, 4 Westerners and 1 Michigander. ¶ Arranged alternately by region, all 5 Southern opponents were Democrats; the 3 Northern opponents split evenly between 1 Democrat, 1 Republican and 1 Socialist; the 33 Midwestern opponents divided between 27 Republicans and 6 Democrats; and the 9 Western opponents divided evenly between 4 Democrats, 4 Republicans and 1 Prohibitionist.

Citations

  1. April 2, 1917: Address to Congress Requesting a Declaration of War Against Germany, Miller Center at the University of Virginia
  2. "Text Of The Declaration Of War Against Germany, World War I" Archived 2015-07-08 at the Wayback Machine The National Center for Public Policy Research website. Retrieved 2010-14-7
  3. “It Has No Popular Support”: Robert M. La Follette Votes Against a Declaration of War , from the Congressional Record — Senate, April 4, 1917, 224–225. The unabridged original may be read at Turning Points in Wisconsin History at the Wisconsin Historical Society.
  4. TO PASS S.J. RES. 1,(40 STAT-1)M DECKARUBG WAR ON GERMANY... (sic) (full Senate roll-call from govtrack.us)
  5. 1 2 Kull, Irving S. and Kull, Nell M. (1965) An Encyclopedia of American History in Chronological Order. New York: Popular Library. p.342
  6. 1 2 Morris, Robert B. (ed.) (1961) Encyclopedia of American History (revised and enlarged edition), New York: Harper and Row. p.309
  7. TO ADOPT S. J. RES. 1, (43 STAT-1, APRIL 16, 1917), DECLARING THAT A STATE OF WAR EXISTS... (full roll call in the House)
  8. Staff (April 6, 1917). "U. S. at War with Germany; President Signs Resolution". Evening Star . Washington, D.C. p. 1. Retrieved 6 April 2017.

Sources

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Allen G. Thurman</span> American politician and judge (1813–1895)

Allen Granberry Thurman, sometimes erroneously spelled Allan Granberry Thurman, was a Democratic U.S. representative, Ohio Supreme Court justice, and Senator from Ohio. He unsuccessfully ran for Vice President of the United States in 1888 with President Grover Cleveland.

The Neutrality Acts were a series of acts passed by the US Congress in 1935, 1936, 1937, and 1939 in response to the growing threats and wars that led to World War II. They were spurred by the growth in isolationism and non-interventionism in the US following the US joining World War I, and they sought to ensure that the US would not become entangled again in foreign conflicts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alben W. Barkley</span> Vice president of the United States from 1949 to 1953

Alben William Barkley was an American lawyer and politician from Kentucky who served as the 35th vice president of the United States from 1949 to 1953 under President Harry S. Truman. In 1905, he was elected to local offices and in 1912 as a U.S. representative. Serving in both houses of Congress, he was a liberal Democrat, supporting President Woodrow Wilson's New Freedom domestic agenda and foreign policy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Margaret Chase Smith</span> American politician (1897–1995)

Margaret Madeline Chase Smith was an American politician. A member of the Republican Party, she served as a U.S. representative (1940–1949) and a U.S. senator (1949–1973) from Maine. She was the first woman to serve in both houses of the United States Congress, and the first woman to represent Maine in either. A Republican, she was among the first to criticize the tactics of Joseph McCarthy in her 1950 speech, "Declaration of Conscience".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Sparkman</span> American politician (1899–1985)

John Jackson Sparkman was an American jurist and politician from the state of Alabama. A Southern Democrat, Sparkman served in the United States House of Representatives from 1937 to 1946 and the United States Senate from 1946 until 1979. He was the Democratic Party's nominee for vice president in the 1952 presidential election.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wayne Morse</span> U.S. Senator from Oregon who served from 1945 to 1969

Wayne Lyman Morse was an American attorney and United States Senator from Oregon. Morse is well known for opposing the Democratic Party’s leadership and for his opposition to the Vietnam War on constitutional grounds.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">George W. Norris</span> American politician (1861–1944)

George William Norris was an American politician from the state of Nebraska in the Midwestern United States. He served five terms in the United States House of Representatives as a Republican, from 1903 until 1913, and five terms in the United States Senate, from 1913 until 1943. He served four terms as a Republican and his final term as an independent. Norris was defeated for re-election in 1942.

United States non-interventionism primarily refers to the foreign policy that was eventually applied by the United States between the late 18th century and the first half of the 20th century whereby it sought to avoid alliances with other nations in order to prevent itself from being drawn into wars that were not related to the direct territorial self-defense of the United States. Neutrality and non-interventionism found support among elite and popular opinion in the United States, which varied depending on the international context and the country's interests. At times, the degree and nature of this policy was better known as isolationism, such as the interwar period.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1916 United States House of Representatives elections</span> House elections for the 65th U.S. Congress

1916 United States House of Representatives elections were elections for the United States House of Representatives to elect members to serve in the 65th United States Congress. They were held for the most part on November 7, 1916, while Maine held theirs on September 11. They coincided with the re-election of President Woodrow Wilson.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lyman Trumbull</span> American politician (1813–1896)

Lyman Trumbull was an American lawyer, judge, and politician who represented the state of Illinois in the United States Senate from 1855 to 1873. As an ardent abolitionist and key political ally to Abraham Lincoln, and a leading legislator during the Civil War and Reconstruction, authoring the Confiscation Acts, which created the legal basis for the Emancipation Proclamation; Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which abolished chattel slavery; and Civil Rights Act of 1866, which led to the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thomas A. Jenkins</span> American politician

Thomas Albert Jenkins was a member of the Ohio state senate and a long-serving U.S. Representative from Ohio's 10th District. He was born in Oak Hill, Jackson County, Ohio.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">William E. Mason (American politician)</span> American politician (1850–1921)

William Ernest Mason was a Republican U.S. Representative and Senator from Illinois. He was the father of Winnifred Sprague Mason Huck.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Frederick Hale (American politician)</span> American politician

Frederick Hale was the United States senator from Maine from 1917 to 1941. He was the son of Eugene Hale and the grandson of Zachariah Chandler, both also U.S. senators. He was the brother of diplomat Chandler Hale, and the cousin of U.S. Representative Robert Hale.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Harry Lane</span> American politician

Harry Lane was an American politician in the state of Oregon. A physician by training, Lane served as the head of the Oregon State Insane Asylum before being forced out by political enemies. After a decade practicing medicine, the progressive Democrat won election as the mayor of Portland in 1905, gaining re-election in 1907. Lane's tenure in office was largely uneventful, although he did gain lasting recognition for having appointed the first female police officer in America in 1908 as well as for his vision that the city should host an annual Rose Festival.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">American entry into World War I</span>

The United States entered into World War I in April 1917, more than two and a half years after the war began in Europe.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States declaration of war on the United Kingdom</span>

An Act Declaring War between the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and the Dependencies Thereof and the United States of America and Their Territories was passed by the 12th United States Congress on June 18, 1812, thereby beginning the War of 1812. It was signed by James Madison, the 4th President of the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States declaration of war on Japan</span> 1941 US declaration of war in response to the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor

On December 8, 1941 at 12:30 PM ET the United States Congress declared war, on the Empire of Japan in response to its surprise attack on Pearl Harbor and subsequent declaration of war the prior day. The Joint Resolution Declaring that a state of war exists between the Imperial Government of Japan and the Government and the people of the United States and making provisions to prosecute the same was formulated an hour after the Infamy Speech of President Franklin D. Roosevelt. Following the U.S. declaration, Japan's allies, Germany and Italy, declared war on the United States, bringing the United States fully into World War II. The Japanese government had originally intended to deliver the declaration thirty minutes before the attack, but the Japanese embassy in Washington took too long to decode the 5,000-word document.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Authorization for the Use of Military Force Against the Government of Syria to Respond to Use of Chemical Weapons</span> 2013 US Senate Joint Resolution

The Authorization for the Use of Military Force Against the Government of Syria to Respond to Use of Chemical Weapons is a United States Senate Joint Resolution that would have authorized President Barack Obama to use the American military to intervene in the ongoing Syrian Civil War. The bill was filed by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid on September 6, 2013 in a specially scheduled pro forma Senate session that took place during the last week of the August recess. The bill would have authorized only 60 days of military action, with the possibility of a one-time extension of 30 days. The bill would have specifically prohibited the use of ground troops. However, this bill never received a floor vote in either the House or Senate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States declaration of war on Austria-Hungary</span>

The 1917 United States declaration of war on Austria-Hungary, officially House Joint Resolution 169, was a resolution adopted by the United States Congress declaring that a state of war existed between the United States of America and the Austro-Hungarian Empire. It occurred eight months after the earlier declaration of war against Germany that had brought the United States into World War I. Enacted on December 7, 1917 and coming into effect the same day, it was officially terminated in 1921, three years after the effective capitulation of Austria-Hungary.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gore–McLemore resolutions</span>

The Gore–McLemore resolutions were a set of United States Congressional resolutions introduced in early 1916 that warned US citizens against travel on armed merchant or passenger ships of belligerent nations in World War 1. These resolutions came as the German Empire was preparing to ramp up its U-boat campaign in the spring of 1916, and in the aftermath of maritime disasters such as the sinking of the Lusitania. Though the two resolutions indicated a fracture between Congressional Democrats and President Woodrow Wilson regarding Germany's policy on submarine warfare, ultimately, most Congressional Democrats rallied behind President Wilson. The McLemore resolution in the House and the Gore resolution in the Senate were both tabled shortly after they were introduced.