Lake Naroch offensive

Last updated
Lake Naroch offensive
Part of Eastern Front during World War I
Russian artillery during Lake Naroch offensive.jpg
Russian artillery firing during the offensive
Date18–30 March 1916
Location
Result

Tactical German victory

  • German offensive on Verdun has been temporarily halted [1]
Belligerents
Flag of the German Empire.svg  German Empire Flag of Russia (1914-1917).svg Russian Empire
Commanders and leaders
Flag of the German Empire.svg Hermann von Eichhorn Flag of Russia (1914-1917).svg Alexei Kuropatkin
Flag of Russia (1914-1917).svg Alexei Evert
Units involved
Flag of the German Empire.svg 10th Army Flag of Russia (1914-1917).svg 2nd Army
Strength
81,975–592,200
720 guns [2] [3]
372,932–766,900
887 guns [4] [3]
Casualties and losses
20,000 casualties [5] [6]
(German estimate)
40,000 casualties [7]
(Russian estimate)
110,000 casualties [8]
(German estimate)
76,409 casualties
(12,000 due to hypothermia) [9]
(Russian estimate)

The Lake Naroch offensive in 1916 was an unsuccessful Russian offensive on the Eastern Front in World War I. It was launched at the request of Marshal Joseph Joffre and intended to relieve the German pressure on French forces. [10] Due to lack of reconnaissance, Russian artillery support failed to overcome and neutralise the well-fortified German defenses and artillery positions, leading to costly and unproductive direct attacks, hindered by the weather. [11] On 30 March General Evert ordered a halt to the offensive. [12]

Contents

Background

Under the terms of the Chantilly Agreement of December 1915 Russia, France, Great Britain and Italy were committed to simultaneous attacks against the Central Powers in the summer of 1916. Russia felt the need to lend troops to fight in France and Salonika (against her own wishes), and to attack on the Eastern Front, in the hope of obtaining munitions from Britain and France. [13]

The Lake Naroch offensive was launched at the request of France, in the hope that the Germans would transfer more units to the East after their attack on Verdun. [14] Joseph Joffre had made the request directly to Mikhail Alexeyev. According to Prit Buttar, "Alexeyev now convened a meeting on 24 February that included all three front commanders, where it was decided that, given the losses suffered by Ivanov's troops in January, any new attack would have to be made by one or both of the other fronts. After some discussion, the point chosen was the junction between the two fronts." The Northern Front, commanded by Alexei Kuropatkin, and West Front, commanded by Alexei Evert, had 266,000 and 643,000 infantry respectively, while the opposing Germans amounted to 495,000. [15]

Comparison of strength

The Russian Northern Front was composed of the Twelfth Army, commanded by Vladimir Gorbatovsky, and the Fifth Army, commanded by Vasily Gurko. The force devoted to the battle in the Russian West Front was composed of the First Army, commanded by Alexander Litvinov, and the Second Army, commanded by Vladimir Vasilyevich Smirnov. However, before the battle commenced, Smirnov was replaced by Alexander Ragoza. [15] :89–93

The Russian Second Army was made up of 16 infantry and 4 cavalry divisions, 253 battalions, 133 squadrons and had 887 artillery pieces, whereas the German forces numbered 9 infantry and 3 cavalry divisions, 89 battalions, 72 squadrons and 720 guns of various calibres. [16]

On either side of Lake Naroch was the German Tenth Army, commanded by Hermann von Eichhorn. To the north was the Eighth Army, commanded by Otto von Below, and to the south was the Twelfth Army, commanded by Max von Fabeck. [15] :91

Ragoza organized his army into three groups, with the northern group led by Mikhail Pleshkov, consisted of the I and XXVI Corps, with the I Siberian Corps. The central group, led by Leonid Sirelius, consisted of the XXXIV and IV Siberian Corps. The southern group, led by Pyotr Baluyev. [15] :96

Battle

On the morning of 18 March, the Russian heavy artillery bombardment commenced in the northern and southern sectors. However, the bombardment proved ineffective. Russian assault columns found the German defenses mostly intact, and suffered terrible flanking fire. The Russian Second Army suffered 15,000 casualties in that first day, with no gain. On the 19th, the Russian bombardment continued, but the Russian assault again faltered, resulting in an additional 5600 casualties. On 21 March, the Russian assault continued with the I, XXVII and I Siberian Corps, and were able to capture the German front line. On 22 March the Russians were able to add somewhat to their modest gains. On 24 March, the Russian V Corps and III Siberian Corps attacked on the southern sector, but with little gain. On 26 March, further attack by the Russian northern sector were also ineffective. On 29 March, Alexeyev ordered an end to the Russian assault. [15] :96–109

Results

The whole operation turned out to be an utter failure, as it abated the Russians' morale without providing any help to the French, and has become a shining example of the use of a widely known World War I method of war, the human wave attack. Huge masses of men were continuously sent into the battle over and over again in the same place of the enemy front. Eventually, the attack on the German positions was brought to a halt because, as General Evert noted in his order issued on 30 March, it had not led to "decisive results" and "the onset of warm weather and abundant rains" had turned much of the area into swamps. [17]

Literature

• Lloyd, Nick (2024). The Eastern Front. A History of the Great War, 1914-1918. New York: Norton, 2024. ISBN   978-1-324-09271-1

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Brusilov offensive</span> 1916 Russian offensive during World War I

The Brusilov offensive, also known as the June advance, or Battle of Galicia-Volhynia, of June to September 1916 was the Russian Empire's greatest feat of arms during World War I, and among the most lethal offensives in world history. The historian Graydon Tunstall called the Brusilov offensive the worst crisis of World War I for Austria-Hungary and the Triple Entente's greatest victory, but it came at a tremendous loss of life. It was arguably the most successful offensive in the entirety of the First World War. The victory contributed to a morale upsurge among the Russian troops, in 1917, Nicholas II planned a general offensive along the entire front in order to end the Central Powers. After the victory, the Petrograd conference was held at which the post-war structure of the world was discussed. Even despite the losses, the Russian armies were still being reinforced with new forces, the number of weapons increased, and new railways were being built. The offensive's success led Russia's allies to reconsider their positions on postwar territorial concessions, including the status of Anatolia and the Bosphorus Strait.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Second Battle of the Masurian Lakes</span> A battle in 1915 during the First World War on the Eastern front

The Second Battle of the Masurian Lakes or Winter Battle of the Masurian Lakes, known in Germany as the Winter Battle in Masuria and in Russia as the Battle of Augustowo, was the northern part of the Central Powers' offensive on the Eastern Front in the winter of 1915 during World War I. The offensive was intended to advance beyond the Vistula River and perhaps knock Russia out of the war. It was the last major battle fought on German soil during World War I.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of the Vistula River</span> Battle of First World War

The Battle of the Vistula River, also known as the Battle of Warsaw and Ivangorod, was a major Russian victory against the German Empire and Austria-Hungary on the Eastern Front during the First World War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Erzurum offensive</span> 1916 Russian offensive against the Ottoman Empire during WW1

The Erzurum offensive or Battle of Erzurum was a major winter offensive by the Imperial Russian Army on the Caucasus Campaign, during the First World War that led to the capture of the strategic city of Erzurum. The Ottoman forces, in winter quarters, suffered a series of unexpected reverses, which led to a Russian victory.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gorlice–Tarnów offensive</span> 1915 German offensive on the Eastern Front of World War I

The Gorlice–Tarnów offensive during World War I was initially conceived as a minor German offensive to relieve Russian pressure on the Austro-Hungarians to their south on the Eastern Front, but resulted in the Central Powers' chief offensive effort of 1915, causing the total collapse of the Russian lines and their retreat far into Russia. The continued series of actions lasted the majority of the campaigning season for 1915, starting in early May and only ending due to bad weather in October.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aleksei Evert</span> Russian general (1857–1918 or 1926)

Aleksei Ermolaevich Evert was an Imperial Russian general of German descent.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Georg Bruchmüller</span> German artillery officer (1863–1948)

Georg Bruchmüller was a German artillery officer who greatly influenced the development of modern artillery tactics. He was nicknamed Durchbruchmüller, a combination of the German word Durchbruch (breakthrough) with his name.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Great Retreat (Russia)</span> 1915 strategic withdrawal by Russian forces on the Eastern Front of World War I

The Great Retreat was a strategic withdrawal and evacuation on the Eastern Front of World War I in 1915. The Imperial Russian Army gave up the salient in Galicia and the Polish Congress Kingdom. The Russian Empire's critically under-equipped military suffered great losses in the Central Powers' July–September summer offensive operations, which led to the Stavka ordering a withdrawal to shorten the front lines and avoid the potential encirclement of large Russian forces in the salient. While the withdrawal itself was relatively well-conducted, it was a severe blow to Russian morale.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alexander Ragoza</span> Russian-Ukrainian general of the Infantry (1858–1919)

Alexander Frantsevich Ragoza, also known as Oleksandr Frantsevych Rohoza, was a Russian general of the infantry during World War I, and Minister of Defense of the Ukrainian State.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">10th Army (Russian Empire)</span> Military unit

The 10th Army was a field army of the Imperial Russian Army during the First World War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Riga offensive (1917)</span> WWI battle over Riga, Latvia

The Riga offensive, also called the Jugla Offensive or the Battle of Riga, took place in early September 1917 and was last major campaign on the Eastern Front of World War I before the Russian Provisional Government and its army began disintegrating.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Lutsk</span> Part of the Brusilov Offensive (1916)

The Battle of Lutsk took place on the Eastern Front during World War I, from June 4 to June 6, 1916. This was the opening attack of the Brusilov Offensive under the overall command of Alexei Brusilov. The Russian 8th Army made a decisive breakthrough in the defenses of the Austro-Hungarian Fourth Army in the area of the city of Lutsk in Ukraine.

The 8th Siberian Rifle Division was an infantry unit of the Imperial Russian Army. The division was formed in 1904 from a brigade, fighting in the Russo-Japanese War and World War I.

The 282nd Rifle Division was an infantry division of the Soviet Union's Red Army during World War II, formed twice.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vladimir Smirnov (general)</span> Imperial Russian Army general of the infantry

Vladimir Vasilyevich Smirnov was an Imperial Russian Army general of the infantry who was a division, corps and field army commander. He fought in the Russian-Turkish War of 1877–1878 and in World War I.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Dragoslavele</span> World War I battle

The Battle of Dragoslavele was a military engagement fought between Romanian forces on one side and Central Powers forces on the other. It was part of the Romanian Campaign of World War I. The battle resulted in a Romanian victory and the effective end of Central Powers advances in the area.

The LIV Army Corps was a Wehrmacht army corps during World War II. It was formed in June 1941. After February 1944, it was upgraded to a command equivalent in rank but not in name to an army, something that the Wehrmacht dubbed an army detachment. It operated under the following names:

The 549th Volksgrenadier Division was a volksgrenadier infantry division of the German Army during World War II, active from 1944 to 1945. It was formed as the 549th Grenadier Division in July 1944 and became a volksgrenadier division several months later. Fighting on the Eastern Front, it was nearly destroyed in the East Prussian Offensive, with its remnants retreating west and surrendering to American troops at the end of the war.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Nagyszeben (1916)</span>

The Battle of Nagyszeben was a World War I military engagement fought between the forces of the Central Powers on one side and the forces of Romania on the other side. It was the decisive engagement during the Battle of Transylvania, and also the largest, involving four armies out of the five fighting in the region: two Romanian, one German, and one Austro-Hungarian.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vilno-Dvinsk offensive</span> 1915 strategic Russian withdrawal on the Eastern Front of World War I

The Vilno-Dvinsk offensive or Battle of Vilnius took place in the autumn of 1915 between the cities of Vilnius and Daugavpils. It was strategic withdrawal by Russian forces on the Eastern Front of World War I, after a successful summer German offensive. The German armies were under the command of Supreme Commander of All German Forces in the East, Field Marshal Paul von Hindenburg. Although weakened by the transfer of 12 divisions to France and the Balkans, as part of taking a defense, Hindenburg had his forces conduct several secondary offensive operations. Half of the Russian forces and the main German forces on the eastern front took part in the battle. However, the numerical superiority of the Russians did not allow Hindenburg to achieve a lasting success. Further actions for the Germans were unsuccessful as they suffered losses without achieving their goal of taking Daugavpils.

References

  1. Олейников А. Россия-щит Антанты. С предисловием Николая Старикова.-СПб.:Питер, 2016.-336 с.-( серия «Николай Стариков рекомендует прочитать») ISBN 978-5-496-01795-4
  2. Podorozhniy, 1938, p. 47
  3. 1 2 Miltatuli 2017, p. 143.
  4. Podorozhniy, 1938, p. 47
  5. Spencer C. Tucker, Priscilla Mary Roberts, The Encyclopedia of World War I: A Political, Social, and Military History, 2005, p. 381
  6. Подорожный, 1938, p. 152
  7. Podorozhniy, 1938, p. 153
  8. Podorozhniy, 1938, p. 152
  9. Podorozhniy, 1938, pp. 124–125
  10. Zabecki, 2014, p. 735
  11. Zabecki, 2014, p. 735
  12. Podorozhniy, 1938, p. 149
  13. Stone, 1998, p. 221, 252
  14. Keegan 2001, p. 325
  15. 1 2 3 4 5 Buttar, Prit (2017). Russia's Last Gasp: The Eastern Front 1916-17. Oxford: Osprey Publishing. pp. 86–91. ISBN   9781472824899.
  16. Podorozhniy, 1938, p. 47
  17. Podorozhniy, 1938, p. 149


54°51′13″N26°46′34″E / 54.8535°N 26.7761°E / 54.8535; 26.7761