Mechanical filter (respirator)

Last updated
Mechanical filter (respirator)
Corona Face mask FFP3 (50560133268).jpg
Face mask (filtering facepiece respirator) FFP3 with exhalation valve
Regulation 42 CFR 84, EN 149, EN 143
NIOSH scheduleTC-84A
Filtering half mask, reusable elastomeric respirator with pink replaceable pancake filters and grey exhalation valve Police officer wearing half-mask respirator.jpg
Filtering half mask, reusable elastomeric respirator with pink replaceable pancake filters and grey exhalation valve
Full-face elastomeric respirators seal better. Nesimi Kilic & Pil-Soo Hahn (02813605) (cropped).jpg
Full-face elastomeric respirators seal better.

Mechanical filters, a part of particulate respirators, are a class of filter for air-purifying respirators that mechanically stops particulates from reaching the wearer's nose and mouth. They come in multiple physical forms.

Contents

Mechanism of operation

Small particles zigzag due to Brownian motion, and are easily captured (diffusion). Large particles get strained out (interception), or have too much inertia to turn, and hit a fiber (impaction). Mid-size particles follow flowlines and are more likely to get through the filter; the hardest size to filter is 0.3 microns diameter. Filteration Collection Mechanisms-en.svg
Small particles zigzag due to Brownian motion, and are easily captured (diffusion). Large particles get strained out (interception), or have too much inertia to turn, and hit a fiber (impaction). Mid-size particles follow flowlines and are more likely to get through the filter; the hardest size to filter is 0.3 microns diameter.
Filter mechanisms Filter collection mechanisms.svg
Filter mechanisms

Mechanical filter respirators retain particulate matter such as dust created during woodworking or metal processing, when contaminated air is passed through the filter material. Wool is still used today as a filter, along with plastic, glass, cellulose, and combinations of two or more of these materials. Since the filters cannot be cleaned and reused and have a limited lifespan, cost and disposability are key factors. Single-use, disposable and replaceable-cartridge models exist. [3]

Mechanical filters remove contaminants from air in the following ways: [4] [5]

  1. by interception when particles following a line of flow in the airstream come within one radius of a fiber and adhere to it; [3]
  2. by impaction, when larger particles unable to follow the curving contours of the airstream are forced to embed in one of the fibers directly; this increases with diminishing fiber separation and higher air flow velocity [3]
  3. by an enhancing mechanism called diffusion, where gas molecules collide with the smallest particles, especially those below 100 nm in diameter, which are thereby impeded and delayed in their path through the filter; this effect is similar to Brownian motion and increases the probability that particles will be stopped by either of the two mechanisms above; it becomes dominant at lower air flow velocities [3]
  4. by using electret filter material (usually, electrospun plastic fibers) to attract or repel particles with an electrostatic charge, so that they are more likely to collide with the filter surface [4] [5]

More obscure mechanisms include:

  1. by using certain coatings on the fibers that kill or deactivate infectious particles colliding with them (such as salt) [6]
  2. by using gravity and allowing particles to settle into the filter material (this effect is typically negligible) [7]

Considering only particulates carried on an air stream and a fiber mesh filter, diffusion predominates below the 0.1 μm diameter particle size. Impaction and interception predominate above 0.4 μm. In between, near the most penetrating particle size of 0.3 μm, diffusion and interception predominate. [3]

Cross-section of NIOSH-approved P95 filters used in metalworking operations. Even "clean" industrial processes often generate large amounts of harmful particulate matter and require breathing protection. NIOSH P95 cross section.jpg
Cross-section of NIOSH-approved P95 filters used in metalworking operations. Even "clean" industrial processes often generate large amounts of harmful particulate matter and require breathing protection.

Materials

Mechanical filters can be made of a fine mesh of synthetic polymer fibers. [8] [9] The fibers are produced by melt blowing. [10] The fibers are charged as they are blown to produce an electret, [11] and then layered to form a nonwoven polypropylene fabric. [8] [9]

Uses

Filtering facepiece respirators

Filtering facepiece respirators consist mainly of the mechanical filtration medium itself, and are discarded when they become unusable due to damage, dirt, or excessive breathing resistance. [12] Filtering facepieces are typically simple, light, single-piece, half-face masks and employ the first three mechanical filter mechanisms in the list above to remove particulates from the air stream. The most common of these is the white, disposable standard N95 variety; another type is the Surgical N95 mask. It is discarded after single use or some extended period depending on the contaminant. NIOSH recommends not reusing filtering facepieces in biosafety level 2 or 3 laboratories. [13]

Elastomeric respirators

A half-face elastomeric air-purifying respirator. This kind of respirator is reusable, with the filters being replaced periodically. Air-Purifying Respirator.jpg
A half-face elastomeric air-purifying respirator. This kind of respirator is reusable, with the filters being replaced periodically.

Elastomeric respirators, also called reusable air-purifying respirators, [14] seal to the face with elastomeric material, which may be a natural or synthetic rubber. They are generally reusable. Full-face versions of elastomeric respirators seal better and protect the eyes. [15]

Elastomeric respirators consist of a reusable mask that seals to the face, with exchangeable filters. [16] [17] Elastomeric respirators can be used with chemical cartridge filters that remove gases, mechanical filters that retain particulate matter, or both. [18] As particulate filters, they are comparable [16] (or, due to the quality and error-tolerance of the elastomeric seal, possibly superior [18] ) to filtering facepiece respirators such as most disposable N95 respirators and FFP masks. [16]

Powered air-purifying respirators (PAPRs)

A powered air-purifying respirator (PAPR) is a type of respirator used to safeguard workers against contaminated air. PAPRs consist of a headgear-and-fan assembly that takes ambient air contaminated with one or more type of pollutant or pathogen, actively removes (filters) a sufficient proportion of these hazards, and then delivers the clean air to the user's face or mouth and nose. They have a higher assigned protection factor than filtering facepiece respirators such as N95 masks. PAPRs are sometimes called positive-pressure masks, blower units, or just blowers.

Filtration standards

U.S. standards (N95 and others)

A video describing N95 certification testing

Under the current revision of Part 84 established in 1995, NIOSH established nine classifications of approved particulate filtering respirators based on a combination of the respirator series and efficiency level. The first part of the filter's classification indicates the series using the letters N, R, or P to indicate the filter's resistance to filtration efficiency degradation when exposed to oil-based or oil-like aerosols (e.g., lubricants, cutting fluids, glycerine, etc.). [19] [20] [21] Definitions and intended use for each series is indicated below. [22]

  • N for not resistant to oil. Used when oil particulates are not present. Tested using sodium chloride particles.
  • R for resistant to oil. Used when oil particulates are present and the filter is disposed of after one shift. Tested using dioctyl phthalate (DOP) oil particles.
  • P for oil-proof. Used when oil particulates are present and the filter is re-used for more than one shift. Tested with DOP oil particles.

The second value indicates the minimum efficiency level of the filter. When tested according to the protocol established by NIOSH each filter classification must demonstrate the minimum efficiency level indicated below.

NIOSH particulate respirator class minimum efficiency levels [19]
ParticulateRespirator classMinimum efficiency
level
Permitted for TB
NaCl (N) or DOP (R,P) N95, R95, P9595%Yes
N99, R99, P9999%
N100, R100, P10099.97%

All respirator types are permitted for TB. [23] [24] Class-100 filters can block asbestos. [25] For N type filters, a 200 mg load of NaCl is used, with and undefined service time. For R type filters, a 200 mg of DOP is used, with a defined service time of "one work shift". For P type filters, an indefinite amount of DOP is used until filtration efficiency stabilizes. [26] P100 filters, under 42 CFR part 84, are the only filters permitted to be magenta in color. [27]

HE (high-efficiency) labeled filters (described in the subsection) are only provided for powered air-purifying respirators. HE-marked filters are 99.97% efficient against 0.3 micron particles and are oil-proof. [28] [29] [30]

Since filters are tested against the by definition most penetrating particle size of 0.3 μm, an APR with a P100 classification would be at least 99.97% efficient at removing particles of this size. [21] Particles with a size both less than and greater than 0.3 μm may be filtered at an efficiency greater than 99.97%. [31] [32] However, this may not always be the case, as the most penetrating particle size for N95s was measured to be below 0.1 μm, as opposed to the predicted size of between 0.1 and 0.3 μm. [33]

European standards (FFP2 and others)

FFP2 masks 2009Julija-210.jpg
FFP2 masks
Face mask FFP2 without exhalation valve Corona Face mask FFP2 (50577401782).jpg
Face mask FFP2 without exhalation valve

The EN 149 standard defines performance requirements for three classes of particle-filtering half masks: FFP1, FFP2 and FFP3. The protection provided by an FFP2 (or FFP3) mask includes the protection provided by a mask of the lower-numbered classes.

A mask conforming to the standard must have its class written on it, along with the name of the standard and its year of publication, as well as any applicable option codes, e.g. “EN 149:2001 FFP1 NR D”. Some manufacturers use in addition the colour of the elastic band to identify the mask class, however, the EN 149 standard does not specify any such colour coding and different manufacturers have used different colour schemes.

Class [34] Filter penetration limit (at 95 L/min air flow)Inward leakageTypical elastic band
FFP1Filters at least 80% of airborne particles<22%Yellow
FFP2Filters at least 94% of airborne particles<8%Blue or White
FFP3Filters at least 99% of airborne particles<2%Red
3M 2091 filter with P3-BR approval 160829-N-JH293-018 (29157548020).jpg
3M 2091 filter with P3-BR approval

European standard EN 143 defines the 'P' classes of particle filters that can be attached to a face mask. These filters are typically used on reusable respirators, like elastomeric respirators. [35]

StandardClassFilter typeFilter penetration limit (at 95 L/min air flow)Inward leakageTypical elastic band
EN 14683 [36] Type IMaskLess than 98% droplet filtration, intended for use by patientsN/AN/A
Type IINot fluid-resistant, 98% droplet filtration, intended for use by healthcare workers in droplet-free environments
Type IIRFluid-resistant, 98% droplet filtration, surgical
EN 143P1AttachmentFilters at least 80% of airborne particlesN/AN/A
P2Filters at least 94% of airborne particles
P3Filters at least 99.95% of airborne particles
Both European standard EN 143 and EN 149 test filter penetration with dry sodium chloride and paraffin oil aerosols after storing the filters at 70 °C (158 °F) and −30 °C (−22 °F) for 24 h each. The standards include testing mechanical strength, breathing resistance and clogging. EN 149 tests the inward leakage between the mask and face, where 10 human subjects perform 5 exercises each. The truncated mean of average leakage from 8 individuals must not exceed the aforementioned values. [37] :§ 8.5

Other standards (KN95 and others)

Chinese standard for respirators GB2626-2006.pdf
Chinese standard for respirators
Face mask KN95 Corona Face mask KN95 (50576539878).jpg
Face mask KN95

Respirator standards around the world loosely fall into the two camps of US- and EU-like grades. According to 3M, respirators made according to the following standards are equivalent to US N95 or European FFP2 respirators "for filtering non-oil-based particles such as those resulting from wildfires, PM 2.5 air pollution, volcanic eruptions, or bioaerosols (e.g. viruses)": [38]

The NPPTL has also published a guideline for using non-NIOSH masks instead of the N95 in the COVID-19 response. The OSHA has a similar document. The following respirator standards are considered similar to N95 in the US: [52] [53]

Disinfection and reuse

Hard filtering facepiece respirator masks are generally designed to be disposable, for 8 hours of continuous or intermittent use. One laboratory found that there was a decrease in fit quality after five consecutive donnings. [63] Once they are physically too clogged to breathe through, they must be replaced.

Hard filtering facepiece respirator masks are sometimes reused, especially during pandemics, when there are shortages. Infectious particles could survive on the masks for up to 24 hours after the end of use, according to studies using models of SARS-CoV-2; [63] In the COVID-19 pandemic, the US CDC recommended that if masks run short, each health care worker should be issued with five masks, one to be used per day, such that each mask spends at least five days stored in a paper bag between each use. If there are not enough masks to do this, they recommend sterilizing the masks between uses. [64] Some hospitals have been stockpiling used masks as a precaution. [65] The US CDC issued guidelines on stretching N95 supplies, recommending extended use over re-use. They highlighted the risk of infection from touching the contaminated outer surface of the mask, which even professionals frequently unintentionally do, and recommended washing hands every time before touching the mask. To reduce mask surface contamination, they recommended face shields, and asking patients to wear masks too ("source masking"). [66]

Apart from time, other methods of disinfection have been tested. Physical damage to the masks has been observed when microwaving them, microwaving them in a steam bag, letting them sit in moist heat, and hitting them with excessively high doses of ultraviolet germicidal irradiation (UVGI). Chlorine-based methods, such as chlorine bleach, may cause residual smell, offgassing of chlorine when the mask becomes moist, and in one study, physical breakdown of the nosepads, causing increased leakage. [63] Fit and comfort do not seem to be harmed by UVGI, moist heat incubation, and microwave-generated steam. [63]

Some methods may not visibly damage the mask, but they ruin the mask's ability to filter. This has been seen in attempts to sterilize by soaking in soap and water, heating dry to 160 °C (320 °F), and treating with 70% isopropyl alcohol, and hydrogen peroxide gas plasma [63] (made under a vacuum with radio waves [67] ). The static electrical charge on the microfibers is destroyed by some cleaning methods. UVGI (ultraviolet light), boiling water vapour, and dry oven heating do not seem to reduce the filter efficiency, and these methods successfully decontaminate masks. [63]

UVGI (an ultraviolet method), ethylene oxide, dry oven heating and vaporized hydrogen peroxide are currently the most-favoured methods in use in hospitals, but none have been properly tested. [63] Where enough masks are available, cycling them and reusing a mask only after letting it sit unused for five days is preferred. [64]

It has been shown that masks can also be sterilized by ionizing radiation. [68] Gamma radiation and high energy electrons penetrate deeply into the material and can be used to sterilize large batches of masks within a short time period. The masks can be sterilized up to two times but have to be recharged after every sterilization as the surface charge is lost upon radiation.

A recent development is a composite fabric that can deactivate both biological and chemical threats. [69]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gas mask</span> Protection from inhaling airborne pollutants and toxic gases

A gas mask is a piece of personal protective equipment used to protect the wearer from inhaling airborne pollutants and toxic gases. The mask forms a sealed cover over the nose and mouth, but may also cover the eyes and other vulnerable soft tissues of the face. Most gas masks are also respirators, though the word gas mask is often used to refer to military equipment, the scope used in this article. Gas masks only protect the user from ingesting or inhaling chemical agents, as well as preventing contact with the user's eyes. Most combined gas mask filters will last around 8 hours in a biological or chemical situation. Filters against specific chemical agents can last up to 20 hours.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Personal protective equipment</span> Equipment designed to help protect an individual from hazards

Personal protective equipment (PPE) is protective clothing, helmets, goggles, or other garments or equipment designed to protect the wearer's body from injury or infection. The hazards addressed by protective equipment include physical, electrical, heat, chemical, biohazards, and airborne particulate matter. Protective equipment may be worn for job-related occupational safety and health purposes, as well as for sports and other recreational activities. Protective clothing is applied to traditional categories of clothing, and protective gear applies to items such as pads, guards, shields, or masks, and others. PPE suits can be similar in appearance to a cleanroom suit.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Surgical mask</span> Mouth and nose cover against bacterial aerosols

A surgical mask, also known by other names such as a medical face mask or procedure mask, is a personal protective equipment used by healthcare professionals that serves as a mechanical barrier that interferes with direct airflow in and out of respiratory orifices. This helps reduce airborne transmission of pathogens and other aerosolized contaminants between the wearer and nearby people via respiratory droplets ejected when sneezing, coughing, forceful expiration or unintentionally spitting when talking, etc. Surgical masks may be labeled as surgical, isolation, dental or medical procedure masks.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Respirator</span> Device worn to protect the user from inhaling contaminants

A respirator is a device designed to protect the wearer from inhaling hazardous atmospheres including lead fumes, vapors, gases and particulate matter such as dusts and airborne pathogens such as viruses. There are two main categories of respirators: the air-purifying respirator, in which respirable air is obtained by filtering a contaminated atmosphere, and the air-supplied respirator, in which an alternate supply of breathable air is delivered. Within each category, different techniques are employed to reduce or eliminate noxious airborne contaminants.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Respirator fit test</span> Safety procedure for testing PPE air-tightness

A respirator fit test checks whether a respirator properly fits the face of someone who wears it. The fitting characteristic of a respirator is the ability of the mask to separate a worker's respiratory system from ambient air.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chemical cartridge</span> Container that cleans pollution from air inhaled through it

A respirator cartridge or gas mask canister is a type of filter that removes gases, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and other vapors from air through adsorption, absorption, or chemisorption. It is one of two basic types of filters used by air-purifying respirators. The other is a mechanical filter, which removes only particulates. Hybrid filters combine the two.

The National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory (NPPTL) is a research center within the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health located in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, devoted to research on personal protective equipment (PPE). The NPPTL was created in 2001 at the request of the U.S. Congress, in response to a recognized need for improved research in PPE and technologies. It focuses on experimentation and recommendations for respirator masks, by ensuring a level of standard filter efficiency, and develops criteria for testing and developing PPE.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">NIOSH air filtration rating</span> U.S. rating of respirators

The NIOSH air filtration rating is the U.S. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)'s classification of filtering respirators. The ratings describe the ability of the device to protect the wearer from solid and liquid particulates in the air. The certification and approval process for respiratory protective devices is governed by Part 84 of Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Respiratory protective devices so classified include air-purifying respirators (APR) such as filtering facepiece respirators and chemical protective cartridges that have incorporated particulate filter elements.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Powered air-purifying respirator</span> Full-face respirator that provides filtered air to the wearer using an electric fan

A powered air-purifying respirator (PAPR) is a type of respirator used to safeguard workers against contaminated air. PAPRs consist of a headgear-and-fan assembly that takes ambient air contaminated with one or more type of pollutant or pathogen, actively removes (filters) a sufficient proportion of these hazards, and then delivers the clean air to the user's face or mouth and nose. They have a higher assigned protection factor than filtering facepiece respirators such as N95 masks. PAPRs are sometimes called positive-pressure masks, blower units, or just blowers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Respirator assigned protection factors</span>

The respiratory protective devices (RPD) can protect workers only if their protective properties are adequate to the conditions in the workplace. Therefore, specialists have developed criteria for the selection of proper, adequate respirators, including the Assigned Protection Factors (APF) - the decrease of the concentration of harmful substances in the inhaled air, which to be provided with timely and proper use of a certified respirator of certain types (design) by taught and trained workers, when the employer performs an effective respiratory protective device programme.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Workplace respirator testing</span> Testing of respirators in real life conditions

Respirators, also known as respiratory protective equipment (RPE) or respiratory protective devices (RPD), are used in some workplaces to protect workers from air contaminants. Initially, respirator effectiveness was tested in laboratories, but in the late 1960s it was found that these tests gave misleading results regarding the level of protection provided. In the 1970s, workplace-based respirator testing became routine in industrialized countries, leading to a dramatic reduction in the claimed efficacy of many respirator types and new guidelines on how to select the appropriate respirator for a given environment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">N95 respirator</span> Particulate respirator meeting the N95 standard

An N95 respirator is a disposable filtering facepiece respirator or reusable elastomeric respirator filter that meets the U.S. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) N95 standard of air filtration, filtering at least 95% of airborne particles that have a mass median aerodynamic diameter of 0.3 micrometers under 42 CFR 84, effective July 10, 1995. A surgical N95 is also rated against fluids, and is regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration under 21 CFR 878.4040, in addition to NIOSH 42 CFR 84. 42 CFR 84, the federal standard which the N95 is part of, was created to address shortcomings in the prior United States Bureau of Mines respirator testing standards, as well as tuberculosis outbreaks, caused by the HIV/AIDS epidemic in the United States. Since then, N95 respirator has continued to be solidified as a source control measure in various pandemics that have been experienced in the United States and Canada, including the 2009 swine flu and the COVID-19 pandemic.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cloth face mask</span> Mask made of common textiles worn over the mouth and nose

A cloth face mask is a mask made of common textiles, usually cotton, worn over the mouth and nose. When more effective masks are not available, and when physical distancing is impossible, cloth face masks are recommended by public health agencies for disease "source control" in epidemic situations to protect others from virus laden droplets in infected mask wearers' breath, coughs, and sneezes. Because they are less effective than N95 masks, surgical masks, or physical distancing in protecting the wearer against viruses, they are not considered to be personal protective equipment by public health agencies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic</span> Health control procedure against COVID-19

During the COVID-19 pandemic, face masks or coverings, including N95, FFP2, surgical, and cloth masks, have been employed as public and personal health control measures against the spread of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19.

Peter Tsai is a Taiwanese-American inventor and material scientist who is best known for inventing and patenting improved meltblown filtration manufacturing techniques, used in respirators (like N95 respirators, which is a 1995 NIOSH standard made to address the shortcomings of USBM standards). He is an expert in the field of nonwoven fabric. Tsai was a Professor Emeritus at the University of Tennessee, but ended his retirement during the COVID-19 pandemic to research mask and respirator sterilization.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Source control (respiratory disease)</span> Strategy for reducing disease transmission

Source control is a strategy for reducing disease transmission by blocking respiratory secretions produced through breathing, speaking, coughing, sneezing or singing. Multiple source control techniques can be used in hospitals, but for the general public wearing personal protective equipment during epidemics or pandemics, respirators provide the greatest source control, followed by surgical masks, with cloth face masks recommended for use by the public only when there are shortages of both respirators and surgical masks.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elastomeric respirator</span> Respirator with a rubber face seal

Elastomeric respirators, also called reusable air-purifying respirators, seal to the face with elastomeric material, which may be a natural or synthetic rubber. They are generally reusable. Full-face versions of elastomeric respirators seal better and protect the eyes.

The European respirator standards refer to the filtering classification by EN 149, EN 14683, and EN 143, all European standards of testing and marking requirements for respirators. FFP standard masks cover the nose, mouth and chin and may have inhalation and/or exhalation valves.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supplied-air respirator</span> Breathing apparatuus remotely supplied by an air hose

A supplied-air respirator (SAR) or air-line respirator is a breathing apparatus used in places where the ambient air may not be safe to breathe. It uses an air hose to supply air from outside the danger zone. It is similar to a self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA), except that SCBA users carry their air with them in high pressure cylinders, while SAR users get it from a remote stationary air supply connected to them by a hose. They may be equipped with a backup air tank in case the air-line gets cut.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Glossary of breathing apparatus terminology</span> Definitions of technical terms used in connection with breathing apparatus

A breathing apparatus or breathing set is equipment which allows a person to breathe in a hostile environment where breathing would otherwise be impossible, difficult, harmful, or hazardous, or assists a person to breathe. A respirator, medical ventilator, or resuscitator may also be considered to be breathing apparatus. Equipment that supplies or recycles breathing gas other than ambient air in a space used by several people is usually referred to as being part of a life-support system, and a life-support system for one person may include breathing apparatus, when the breathing gas is specifically supplied to the user rather than to the enclosure in which the user is the occupant.

References

  1. "Elastomeric Respirators: Strategies During Conventional and Surge Demand Situations". U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 11 February 2020.
  2. Wei, Neo Kang (6 May 2019). "What is PM0.3 and Why Is It Important?". Smart Air Filters.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 TSI Incorporated. "Mechanisms of Filtration for High Efficiency Fibrous Filters - Application Note ITI-041" (PDF). Retrieved 29 April 2020.
  4. 1 2 perry, J.L.; Agui, J.H.; Vijayakumar, R. (May 2016), Submicron and Nanoparticulate Matter Removal by HEPA-Rated Media Filters and Packed Beds of Granular Materials (PDF), NASA
  5. 1 2 "Guidance for Filtration and Air-Cleaning Systems to Protect Building Environments from Airborne Chemical, Biological, or Radiological Attacks" (PDF). CDC NIOSH. April 2003. doi:10.26616/NIOSHPUB2003136.
  6. Quan, Fu-Shi; Rubino, Ilaria; Lee, Su-Hwa; Koch, Brendan; Choi, Hyo-Jick (2017-01-04). "Universal and reusable virus deactivation system for respiratory protection". Scientific Reports. 7 (1): 39956. Bibcode:2017NatSR...739956Q. doi: 10.1038/srep39956 . ISSN   2045-2322. PMC   5209731 . PMID   28051158.
  7. 1 2 "Standard for Dust Mask". JICOSH Home.
  8. 1 2 Xie, John (2020-03-19). "World Depends on China for Face Masks But Can Country Deliver?". Voice of America .
  9. 1 2 Evan, Melanie; Hufford, Austen (March 7, 2020). "Critical Component of Protective Masks in Short Supply - The epidemic has driven up demand for material in N95 filters; 'everyone thinks there is this magic factory somewhere'". The Wall Street Journal .
  10. Feng, Emily (2020-03-16). "COVID-19 Has Caused A Shortage Of Face Masks. But They're Surprisingly Hard To Make". NPR .
  11. US 4215682A
  12. "Respirator Trusted-Source Information: What are they?". U.S. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. 2018-01-29. Archived from the original on 2020-03-28. Retrieved 2020-03-27.
  13. "Filtering out Confusion: Frequently Asked Questions about Respiratory Protection" (PDF). NIOSH. 2018. doi:10.26616/NIOSHPUB2018128. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 April 2023. Retrieved 29 May 2024.
  14. "Elastomeric Respirators: Strategies During Conventional and Surge Demand Situations". U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 11 February 2020. Archived from the original on 2023-02-11.
  15. 1 2 3 Bach, Michael (6 July 2017). "Understanding respiratory protection options in Healthcare: The Overlooked Elastomeric". NIOSH Science Blog. CDC.
  16. "Respirator Trusted-Source Information: What are they?". U.S. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. 2018-01-29. Retrieved 2020-03-27.
  17. 1 2 Liverman CT, Yost OC, Rogers BM, et al., eds. (2018-12-06). "Elastomeric Respirators". Reusable Elastomeric Respirators in Health Care: Considerations for Routine and Surge Use. National Academies Press.
  18. 1 2 "42 CFR Part 84 - Approval of Respiratory Protective Devices". ecfr.gov. United States Government Publishing Office. February 6, 2020. Archived from the original on 23 February 2020. Retrieved February 9, 2020.
  19. "Respirator Trusted-Source Information Section 1: NIOSH-Approved Respirators". The National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory (NPPTL). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. January 29, 2018. Archived from the original on 16 June 2019. Retrieved February 9, 2020.
  20. 1 2 "NIOSH Guide to the Selection and Use of Particulate Respirators". The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. June 6, 2014 [January 1996]. Archived from the original on 11 August 2019. Retrieved February 9, 2020.
  21. "OSHA Technical Manual Section 8VII: Chapter 2 Respiratory Protection Appendix 2-4". OSHA (TED 01-00-015 ed.). Archived from the original on 28 September 2019. Retrieved February 9, 2020.
  22. "TB Respiratory Protection Program In Health Care Facilities Administrator's Guide" (PDF). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. September 1999. doi:10.26616/NIOSHPUB99143. Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 October 2022. Retrieved 14 June 2024.
  23. "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service 42 CFR Part 84" (PDF). US Federal Register. pp. 26850-26893. Archived (PDF) from the original on 8 May 2024. Retrieved 2024-05-08.
  24. "NIOSH Pocket Guide - Asbestos". CDC. Archived from the original on 20 June 2024. Retrieved 20 June 2024.
  25. "DHHS Pub 96-101 NIOSH Guide to the Selection & Use of Particulate Respirators Certified Under 42 CFR 84". NIOSH.
  26. Herring Jr., Ronald N. (1997). "42 CFR Part 84: It's time to change respirators... but how?". Engineer's Digest. pp. 14–23.
  27. "Considerations for Optimizing the Supply of Powered Air-Purifying Respirators (PAPRs)". U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2020-04-19. Archived from the original on 6 January 2023. Retrieved 2020-05-25.
  28. Vanessa, Roberts (Fall 2014). "To PAPR or Not to PAPR?". Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy. 50 (3): 87–90. PMC   4456839 . PMID   26078617.
  29. "Understanding Respiratory Protection Against SARS". U.S. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. 2020-04-09. Archived from the original on 6 December 2020. Retrieved 2020-05-26.
  30. "NIOSH Guide to the Selection and Use of Particulate Respirators Appendix E: Commonly Asked Questions and Answers About Part 84 Respirators". The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. June 6, 2014. Archived from the original on 20 June 2019. Retrieved February 9, 2020.
  31. "CDC - NIOSH Publications and Products - Appendices for 96-101". www.cdc.gov. 2018-10-16. Archived from the original on 20 June 2019. Retrieved 2020-06-22.
  32. Lee, Byung Uk; Yermakov, Mikhail; Grinshpun, Sergey A. (2005). "Filtering Efficiency of N95- and R95-Type Facepiece Respirators, Dust-Mist Facepiece Respirators, and Surgical Masks Operating in Unipolarly Ionized Indoor Air Environments" (PDF). Aerosol and Air Quality Research. 5 (1): 25–38. doi:10.4209/aaqr.2005.06.0003. Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 January 2022. Retrieved 4 July 2024.
  33. "Fiche pratique de sécurité ED 105. Appareils de protection respiratoire et métiers de la santé" (PDF). inrs.fr. INRS . Retrieved 7 April 2020.
  34. "Fiche pratique de sécurité ED 105. Appareils de protection respiratoire et métiers de la santé" (PDF). inrs.fr. INRS . Retrieved 7 April 2020.
  35. "COVID-19 Technical Specifications for Personal Protective Equipment and Related IPC supplies" (PDF). World Health Organization.
  36. "NF EN 149+A1". www.boutique.afnor.org. September 2009. alternative source
  37. "Technical Bulletin: Comparison of FFP2, KN95, and N95 and Other Filtering Facepiece Respirator Classes" (PDF). 3M Personal Safety Division. January 2020.
  38. "China Releases an Updated Mandatory Standard GB 2626-2019 Respiratory Protection - Non-Powered Air-Purifying Particle Respirator". HKTDC Research. 20 April 2020. Classification and Marking: 2. Filter element categorization. Retrieved 27 July 2020.
  39. "China Mandatory Standard GB 2626-2019 Respiratory Protection—Non-Powered Air-Purifying Particle Respirator Effective Date Postponed to July 1 2021" (PDF). Bureau Veritas. 24 June 2020. Retrieved 27 July 2020.
  40. "建站成功". harleykn95.com.
  41. "Powecom - home page". www.powecom.com.
  42. "Dasheng Health Products Manufacturing". www.dashengmask.com.
  43. "FLTR95 Sealing Face Masks 100PK - White".
  44. Jung, Hyejung; Kim, Jongbo; Lee, Seungju; Lee, Jinho; Kim, Jooyoun; Tsai, Perngjy; Yoon, Chungsik (2014). "Comparison of Filtration Efficiency and Pressure Drop in Anti-Yellow Sand Masks, Quarantine Masks, Medical Masks, General Masks, and Handkerchiefs". Aerosol and Air Quality Research. 14 (3): 991–1002. doi: 10.4209/aaqr.2013.06.0201 .
  45. "[Global] Soomlab Mask".
  46. "HOME". AirQUEEN™ Nano Mask.
  47. "Main products".
  48. "DR. PURI KF94 MASK | DR PURI KF94 FACE MASK MADE IN KOREA". drpurimask.com. Archived from the original on 2020-11-01.
  49. "블루나(BLUNA) 프리미엄 아기물티슈". 블루나(BLUNA) 프리미엄 아기물티슈.
  50. "TIA - BOTN KF94". en.botn.co.kr.
  51. "NPPTL Respirator Assessments to Support the COVID-19 Response, International Respirator Assessment Request". NPPTL | NIOSH | CDC. 24 April 2020.
  52. "Enforcement Guidance for Use of Respiratory Protection Equipment Certified under Standards of Other Countries or Jurisdictions During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic". Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
  53. "株式会社ホギメディカル".
  54. "クリーン、ヘルス、セーフティで社会に 興研株式会社". www.koken-ltd.co.jp.
  55. "使い捨て式防じんマスク | 製品情報 | 株式会社 重松製作所".
  56. "国家検定合格品 - メガネ - 製品情報 - トーヨーセフティー".
  57. "TRUSCO トラスコ中山株式会社". www.trusco.co.jp.
  58. "製品情報: メディカル資材 医療用マスク&キャップ". www.vicre.co.jp.
  59. "使い捨て式マスク,使い捨て式防じんマスク(Ds2) | Yamamoto 公式オンラインショップ | Yamamoto Safety Online Shop".
  60. "NORMA Oficial Mexicana NOM-116-STPS-2009, Seguridad-Equipo de protección personal-Respiradores purificadores de aire de presión negativa contra partículas nocivas-Especificaciones y métodos de prueba" . Retrieved 2024-07-16.
  61. "NORMA BRASILEIRA E quip amento de proteção respiratória — Peça semifacial fi ltrante para partículas" (PDF). Retrieved 2024-07-16.
  62. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Godoy, Laura R. Garcia; Jones, Amy E.; Anderson, Taylor N.; Fisher, Cameron L.; Seeley, Kylie M. L.; Beeson, Erynn A.; Zane, Hannah K.; Peterson, Jaime W.; Sullivan, Peter D. (1 May 2020). "Facial protection for healthcare workers during pandemics: a scoping review". BMJ Global Health. 5 (5): e002553. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002553. ISSN   2059-7908. PMC   7228486 . PMID   32371574.
  63. 1 2 "Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)". Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 11 February 2020.
  64. Mills, Stu (10 April 2020). "Researchers looking at innovative ways to sterilize single-use masks". Canadian Broadcasting Corporation.
  65. "Recommended Guidance for Extended Use and Limited Reuse of N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators in Healthcare Settings". cdc.gov. NIOSH Workplace Safety and Health Topic. CDC. 27 March 2020.
  66. "Hydrogen Peroxide Gas Plasma". cdc.gov. Disinfection & Sterilization Guidelines, Guidelines Library, Infection Control. 2019-04-04.
  67. Pirker, Luka; Krajnc, Anja Pogačnik; Malec, Jan; Radulović, Vladimir; Gradišek, Anton; Jelen, Andreja; Remškar, Maja; Mekjavić, Igor B.; Kovač, Janez; Mozetič, Miran; Snoj, Luka (2020-10-01). "Sterilization of polypropylene membranes of facepiece respirators by ionizing radiation". Journal of Membrane Science. 619: 118756. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118756. ISSN   0376-7388. PMC   7528844 . PMID   33024349.
  68. Cheung, Yuk Ha; Ma, Kaikai; van Leeuwen, Hans C.; Wasson, Megan C.; Wang, Xingjie; Idrees, Karam B.; Gong, Wei; Cao, Ran; Mahle, John J.; Islamoglu, Timur; Peterson, Gregory W.; de Koning, Martijn C.; Xin, John H.; Farha, Omar K. (October 13, 2021). "Immobilized Regenerable Active Chlorine within a Zirconium-Based MOF Textile Composite to Eliminate Biological and Chemical Threats". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 143 (40): 16777–16785. doi:10.1021/jacs.1c08576. PMID   34590851. S2CID   238229650 via ACS Publications.